High levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in tissues of Atlantic turtles stranded in the Canary Islands, Spain

High levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in tissues of Atlantic turtles stranded in the Canary Islands, Spain

Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemosphere j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r. c o m /...

258KB Sizes 0 Downloads 48 Views

Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Chemosphere j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / ch e m o s p h e r e

High levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in tissues of Atlantic turtles stranded in the Canary Islands, Spain J. Orós a,*, O.M. González-Díaz b, P. Monagas a a b

Vet­er­i­nary Fac­ulty, Uni­ver­sity of Las Pal­mas de Gran Cana­ria, Tras­mon­tana s/n, 35413 Aru­cas (Las Pal­mas), Spain Depart­ment of Chem­is­try, Uni­ver­sity of Las Pal­mas de Gran Cana­ria, Cam­pus Uni­ver­si­tar­io de Taf­ira, 35017 Las Pal­mas de Gran Cana­ria, Spain

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 18 March 2008 Received in revised form 24 August 2008 Accepted 25 August 2008 Available online 4 December 2008  Key­words: Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls Sea tur­tles Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta Che­lo­nia my­das Derm­oche­lys co­ri­a­cea Atlan­tic Ocean

a b s t r a c t Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls (PCBs 28, 31, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180, and 209) were mea­sured in tis­sue sam­ples (liver and fat) from 30 log­ger­head tur­tles Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta, 1 green tur­tle Che­lo­nia my­das, and 1 leath­er­back Derm­oche­lys co­ri­ac­ ea stranded on the coasts of the Canary Islands, try­ing to estab­lish a pos­si­ble rela­tion between PCB con­ cen­tra­tions and the lesions and causes of death. Tis­sues from these tur­tles con­tained higher lev­els of PCBs than those reported in tur­tles from other geo­graph­i­cal regions. )PCB con­cen­tra­tions (1980 ± 5320 ng g¡1 wet wt.) in the liver of log­ger­heads were higher than in the adi­pose tis­sue (450 ± 1700 ng g¡1 wet wt.). Con­cen­tra­tions of PCB 209 in the liver (1200 ± 3120 ng g¡1 wet wt.) of log­ger­heads and in the liver (530 ng g¡1 wet wt.) and adi­pose tis­sue (500 ng g¡1 wet wt.) of the leath­er­back were remark­able. Fre­quen­cies of detec­tion of PCB 209 in the liver (15.5%) and adi­pose tis­sue (31%) were also remark­able. Cachexia was detected in 7 tur­tles (22%) and sep­ti­ce­mia was diag­nosed in 10 tur­tles (31%). Sta­tis­ti­cally, a positive cor­re­la­tion was detected between )PCBs con­cen­tra­tion and cachexia. Poor phys­ic­ al con­di­tion, cachexia and/or sep­ti­cae­mia could explain the high lev­els of PCBs and tis­sue dis­tri­bu­tion. How­ever, no his­to­log­i­cal lesions exclu­sively attrib­uted to the acute effects of PCBs were described. The most prevalent his­to­log­ic­ al lesions were ulcer­a­tive and puru­lent oesoph­a­ gi­tis, puru­lent der­ma­ti­tis, nec­ro­tiz­ing enter­it­ is, and gran­u­lom­a­tous pneu­mo­nia. The bac­te­ria most fre­quently iso­lated were Esch­e­richia coli, Staph­y­lo­coc­cus sp., and Aer­o­mo­nas sp. Although imm­un­osu­pres­sion as a result of PCBs pol­lu­tion has been described pre­vi­ously, other fac­tors in this study, such as inci­den­tal fish­ing, nutri­tional sta­tus, and expo­si­tion to dif­fer­ent micro-organ­isms, make it dif ­fi­cult to estab­lish a clear asso­ci­a­tion between PCB con­cen­tra­tions and causes of death. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Intro­duc­tion Two fam­i­lies and seven spe­cies of sea tur­tles are cur­rently recog­ni­sed (Prit­chard, 1997) and included in the red list of the World Con­ser­va­tion Union (IUCN, 2007). The fam­ily Derm­och­elyi­ dae includes only the leath­er­back (Derm­oche­lys co­ri­a­cea). The fam­ ily Chelo­nii­dae includes the green tur­tle (Che­lo­nia my­das), log­ger­ head (Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta), hawks­bill (Er­etm­oche­lys im­bri­cata), Kemp’s rid­ley (Le­pid­oche­lys kempi), olive rid­ley (Le­pid­oche­lys oliv­a­cea), and flat­back tur­tles (Na­ta­tor de­pressa). The most com­mon spe­cies in the Canary Islands is the log­ger­head tur­tle (Mateo et al., 1997). How­ever, evi­dence of a decline in the pop­u­la­tion of tur­tles in the Canary Islands has been reported (López-Ju­ra­do and Gon­zález, 1983; Blanco and Gon­zález, 1992). Dis­eases and causes of mor­tal­ity among tur­tles stranded in the Canary Islands have been pre­vi­ously reported (Orós et al., 2004, 2005). How­ever, data avail­able for base­line lev­els of con­tam­i­nants

* Cor­re­spond­ing author. Tel.: +34 928451089; fax: +34 928457431. E-mail address: jo­[email protected]­pgc.es (J. Orós). 0045-6535/$ - see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.08.048

and effects on the tur­tle pop­u­la­tions of the Canary Islands are scarce (Tor­rent et al., 2004). Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls (PCBs) have a par­tic­u­lar sig­nif­i­cance because of their unde­sir­able effects on envi­ron­men­tal qual­ity and ani­mal health (Ahl­borg et al., 1994). PCBs were man­u­fac­tured from the 1930s to the 1970s for sev­eral indus­trial appli­ca­tions, such as liquid cool­ants for elec­tri­cal trans­form­ers or as soft­en­ers in the pro­duc­tion of plas­tics and as com­po­nents of hydrau­lic flu­ids and lubri­cat­ing oils. PCBs are able to bio­ac­cu­mu­late through the food chain and their effects have been reported on the immune, endo­ crine, and repro­duc­tive sys­tems of dif­fer­ent ani­mal spe­cies (Fox, 2001). Although much was reported to date on PCBs con­cen­tra­ tions in large pre­da­tors, few stud­ies have been ded­i­cated to tur­tles. These stud­ies have been focused on tur­tles from Long Island (Lake et al., 1994), Vir­ginia (Ry­bit­ski et al., 1995), Scot­land (Mcken­zie et al., 1999), the Hawai­ian Islands (Miao et al., 2001), the Baja Cal­ i­for­nia Pen­in­sula (Gard­ner et al., 2003) and North Car­o­lina (Kel­ ler et al., 2004, 2006). Stud­ies focused on the Med­i­ter­ra­nean Sea have a par­tic­u­lar sig­nif­i­cance because of their num­ber (Cor­so­li­ni et al., 2000; Stor­el­li and Mar­cot­ri­gi­ano, 2000; Pe­ru­gin­i et al., 2006; Stor­el­li et al., 2007).

474

J. Orós et al. / Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

The aim of this study was to eval­u­ate the pres­ence and pat­ terns of eight PCB cong­en­ers (28, 31, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180, and 209) in tis­sue sam­ples (liver and fat) from 32 tur­tles stranded on the coasts of the Canary Islands between August 2002 and Novem­ ber 2005. We also tried to deter­mine a pos­si­ble rela­tion between the PCB con­cen­tra­tions and the lesions and causes of death using the Spear­man’s rho cor­re­la­tion method to cal­cu­late the cor­re­la­tion between )PCB con­cen­tra­tions in both tis­sues and phys­ic­ al con­di­ tions such as cachexia and sep­ti­cae­mia.

was obtained, bac­te­ria were iden­ti­fied based on the bio­chem­i­cal pro­file (API 20 E, API 20 NE, and API 20 STAPH, Bio­Mérieux).

2. Mate­ri­als and meth­ods

2.4. PCBs anal­y­sis

2.1. Tur­tles

Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls (IU­PAC Nos. 28, 31, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180, and 209) were ana­lysed accord­ing to the method described by Tan­a­be et al. (1994). The valid­ity of ana­lyt­i­cal meth­ods was con­ firmed with Stan­dard Ref­er­ence Mate­ri­als (CARP-2: ground whole carp, Cyp­ri­nus car­pio) obtained from the National Research Coun­cil of Can­ada. Precision and accu­racy are reported in Table 2. Briefly, ali­quots (4–7 g) of the homog­en ­ ized sam­ples were ground with anhy­drous sodium sul­phate in a mortar, and extracted using Soxh­let appa­ra­tus for 6 h with 300 mL of diethyl ether:hex­ ane (3:1) sol­vent mix­ture. Extracts were con­cen­trated in vol­ume to 10 mL in Kud­er­na-Dan­ish, and the ali­quots (2 mL) were trans­ferred to a glass col­umn packed with 20 g of Flor­i­sil and dried by pass­ing through nitro­gen gas. Or­ga­nochl­o­rines adsorbed on Flor­i­sil were eluted with 150 mL of 20% hex­ane-washed water in ace­to­ni­trile and trans­ferred to a se­par­a­to­ry fun­nel con­tain­ing 600 mL of hex­ ane-washed water and 100 mL of hex­ane. After par­ti­tion­ing, the hex­ane layer was con­cen­trated, cleaned up with sul­phu­ric acid, and passed through a 12 g Flor­i­sil-packed glass col­umn for sep­a­ ra­tion. Final deter­mi­na­tion of PCBs was car­ried out using a Var­ian 3600 gas chro­mato­graph fit­ted with an elec­tron cap­ture detec­ tor (GC-ECD). In all the anal­y­ses a fused-sil­ica cap­il­lary col­umn ­Su­pe­lco (length = 30 m, inner diam­e­ter 0.53 mm and film thick­ ness 0.50 lm) was used. The col­umn oven tem­per­a­ture was pro­ grammed from 60 to 160 °C, held for 10 min, and then increased to 260 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min and held for 20 min. Injec­tor and detec­ tor tem­per­a­tures were set at 260 and 280 °C, respec­tively. Nitro­gen was used as a car­rier gas at 63.3 mL/min. The PCB patron used as an inter­nal stan­dard was the PCB-Mix 12, Iso-octane (Lab. Dr. Eh­ren­ stor­fer). Quan­ti­fi­ca­tion inter­val used for PCBs was from 1 ng g¡1 (instru­men­tal detec­tion limit) to 50 000 ng g¡1 (opti­mum lin­ear limit). Con­cen­tra­tions of PCBs, means of four mea­sure­ments, are pre­sented as ng g¡1 on a wet weight basis.

Between August 2002 and Novem­ber 2005, 32 tur­tles that got stranded on the coasts of four islands belong­ing to the Canary Islands [Gran Cana­ria (n = 25; 78.1%), Ten­e­rife (n = 3; 9.4%), ­Fu­ert­even­tur­a (n = 2; 6.2%), and El Hi­er­ro (n = 2; 6.2%)] were sub­ mit­ted for nec­ropsy to the Vet­er­i­nary Fac­ulty, Uni­ver­sity of Las Pal­ mas de Gran Cana­ria (UL­PGC). Some of them had been pre­vi­ously sub­mit­ted to the Taf­ira Wild­life Reha­bil­it­ a­tion Cen­ter (TWRC) for health eval­u­a­tion, med­i­cal man­age­ment, and pos­si­ble reha­bil­i­ta­ tion. Spe­cies iden­ti­fi­ca­tions were made accord­ing to Frick (1996). Tur­tles belong­ing to three dif­fer­ent spe­cies were exam­ined: 30 log­ger­heads, C. ca­ret­ta (93.7%), 1 green tur­tle, C. my­das (3.1%), and 1 leath­er­back, D. co­ri­a­cea (3.1%). Spe­cies, sex, age group, and bio­ met­rics data are shown in Table 1. Age group was deter­mined on the basis of straight car­a­pace length (SCL) (Bjorn­dal et al., 2001; Semi­noff et al., 2004) and sex­ual matu­rity (esti­mated from the appear­ance of their gonads). 2.2. Path­ol­og­i­cal and micro­bi­ol­og­ic­ al stud­ies Necr­op­sies were per­formed at the Vet­er­i­nary Fac­ulty (UL­PGC) within the first 12 h after death. The gross postmortem exam­in­a­ tions were car­ried out using the pro­ce­dures pre­vi­ously described (Wol­ke and George, 1981; Orós and Tor­rent, 2001). Gross lesions were recorded and tis­sue sam­ples from all major organs were fixed in 10% neu­tral buf­fered for­ma­lin, embed­ded in par­af ­fi n, sec­tioned at 5 lm for light micros­copy and stained with hae­ma­tox­y­lin and eosin. Spe­cial stains used on selected cases included Gram stain for bac­te­ria, Ziehl-Neel­sen stain for acid-fast organ­isms, peri­odic ­acid-Schiff stain for pro­to­zoa and fun­gal hyphae, Gro­cott’s methe­ na­mine sil­ver nitrate for fungi, and von Kos­sa stain for cal­cium (Ban­croft and Ste­vens, 1996). For the micro­bi­o­log­ic­ al stud­ies, sam­ ples were taken from gross lesions and cul­tured on a vari­ety of selec­tive and non-selec­tive media, includ­ing blood agar (Ox­oid), Mac­Con­key agar (Ox­oid), Baird Parker agar (Ox­oid) for staph­y­lo­ cocci, and Sab­ou­raud Dex­trose agar (Ox­oid) for fungi and yeasts. All cul­tures were incu­bated at 25 °C aer­o­bi­cally. Once a pure growth

2.3. Sam­ples col­lec­tion for PCB anal­y­sis Tis­sues sam­ples (liver and coe­lo­mic fat) were col­lected dur­ing nec­ropsy. After col­lec­tion, the sam­ples were wrapped in an alu­ min­ium foil and stored at ¡20 °C until anal­y­sis. Prior to anal­y­sis, tis­sue sam­ples were homog­en ­ ized using a com­mer­cial blender.

2.5. Sta­tis­ti­cal anal­y­sis Mann–Whit­ney U test was con­ducted to deter­mine whether the dif­fer­ence in the lev­els of PCBs were related to the tis­sues. ­Spear­man’s rho cor­re­la­tion method was used to cal­cu­late the

Table 1 Spe­cies, sex, age group and bio­met­rics data (mean ± stan­dard devi­a­tion) of the tur­ tles ana­lysed

Table 2 Precision and accu­racy of ana­lyt­i­cal meth­ods obtained using a cer­ti­fied ground whole carp Cyp­ri­nus car­pio (CARP-2)a

Spe­cies

Sex

Age group

PCBs

Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta (n = 30)

Female (n = 27; 90%) Male (n = 3; 10%) Female

Pelagic juve­nile 11.5 ± 8.3 (n = 12; 40%) Juve­nile (n = 18; 60%)

41 ± 11.7

Juve­nile

21

52

Female

Adult

231.5

nm

Che­lo­nia my­das (n = 1) Derm­oche­lys co­ri­ac­ ea (n = 1)

SCL: straight car­a­pace length. n: num­ber of tur­tles. nm: not mea­sured.

Weight (kg)

SCL (cm)

PCB 28 PCB 52 PCB 101 PCB 138 PCB 153 PCB 180 PCB 209

CARP-2 Cer­ti­fied

Foundb

34 ± 4.0 138 ± 43 145 ± 48 103 ± 30 105 ± 22 53.3 ± 13.0 4.6 ± 2.0

31 ± 3.1 119.7 ± 13.9 150.1 ± 24.1 99.5 ± 18.7 116 ± 16.6 59.2 ± 10.7 4.8 ± 3.6

a

The con­cen­tra­tions are given in ng g¡1 wet wt.

b

Num­ber de rep­li­cates is 4.



J. Orós et al. / Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

475

c­ or­re­la­tion between )PCB con­cen­tra­tions in both tis­sues and phys­ic­ al con­di­tions such as cachexia and sep­ti­cae­mia. Accord­ing to the nec­ropsy reports, val­ues of 0, 1, and 2 were given to tur­ tles with absence of cachexia, mild cachexia, and severe cachexia, respec­tively. Val­ues of 0, 1, and 2 were also given to tur­tles with absence of infec­tions, infec­tion in one organ, and severe sep­ti­cae­ mia.

Table 3 PCBs con­cen­tra­tions (range, arith­me­tic mean ± stan­dard devi­a­tion) (ng g¡1 wet wt.) in liver and fat of the three spe­cies of sea tur­tles ana­lysed.

3. Results

PCB 28,31

3.1. Gross pathol­ogy, his­to­pa­thol­ogy, and micro­bi­ol­ogy

Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta n = 30

)PCB

PCB 52 PCB 101

The path­o­log­i­cal study revealed that 23 tur­tles (72%) died from lesions asso­ci­ated with human activ­i­ties such as boat-strike inju­ ries (n = 4; 12.5%), entan­gle­ment in der­e­lict fish­ing nets (n = 7; 22%), and inges­tion of hooks and mono­fil­am ­ ent lines (n = 12; 37.5%). Only 9 tur­tles (28%) died from spon­ta­ne­ous dis­eases, includ­ing pulmonary emphy­sema, ulcer­at­ ive ke­ra­to­con­junc­ti­vi­tis, puru­lent ade­ni­tis of the salt glands and puru­lent clo­a­ci­tis. Cachexia was detected in 7 tur­tles (22%). Sep­ti­ce­mia was diag­nosed in 10 tur­tles (31%). The his­to­log­i­cal lesions observed in the log­ger­heads included severe necrotic hep­a­ti­tis (n = 4; 13%), severe mul­ti­fo­cal gran­u­lom­ a­tous hep­a­ti­tis (n = 4; 13%), severe ulcer­at­ ive and puru­lent oesoph­ a­gi­tis (n = 10; 33%), mild puru­lent gas­tri­tis (n = 2; 6.7%), mild to severe nec­ro­tiz­ing enter­i­tis (n = 5; 16.7%), severe puru­lent clo­a­ci­tis (n = 1; 3%), mild to severe gran­u­lom­a­tous pneu­mo­nia (n = 5; 16.7%), severe pulmonary emphy­sema (n = 1; 3%), severe necrotic sple­ni­ tis (n = 1; 3%), severe ulcer­a­tive and puru­lent ke­ra­to­con­junc­ti­vi­tis (n = 3; 10%), severe puru­lent ade­ni­tis of the salt glands (n = 4; 13%) and severe puru­lent der­ma­ti­tis (n = 9; 30%). Bac­te­ria iso­lated from the tis­sue lesions included Esch­e­richia coli (n = 5; 16.7%), Pro­teus sp. (n = 3; 10%), Vib­rio alg­i­no­lyt­i­cus (n = 2; 6.7%), Pseu­do­mo­nas sp. (n = 2; 6.7%), Strep­to­coc­cus sp. (n = 2; 6.7%), Cit­ro­bac­ter freun­dii (n = 2; 6.7%), Aer­o­mo­nas sp. (n = 3; 10%), Staph­y­lo­coc­cus sp. (n = 4; 13%), and Kleb­ si­ella sp. (n = 2; 6.7%). His­to­log­i­cal lesions observed in the spec­im ­ en of C. my­das included severe mul­ti­fo­cal gran­u­lom­a­tous nephri­tis asso­ci­ated to Can­dida gu­il­ler­mondi infec­tion and severe oedema of the lam­ina propia and intes­ti­nal sub­mu­cosa. His­to­log­i­cal lesions observed in the spec­i­men of D. co­ri­ac­ ea included severe mul­ti­fo­cal necrotic nephri­tis, severe gran­u­lom­a­tous pneu­mo­nia and severe nec­ro­tiz­ ing enter­i­tis, and all these lesions were asso­ci­ated with Ser­ra­tia mar­ces­cens infec­tion. 3.2. PCBs PCB con­cen­tra­tions mea­sured in the two tis­sues of the three spe­cies of tur­tles ana­lysed are shown in Table 3. Log­ger­heads showed the high­est hepatic )PCB (IU­PAC Nos. 28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180) mean con­cen­tra­tion (1980 ± 5320 ng g¡1 wet wt.), fol­lowed by the only spec­i­men of D. co­ri­a­cea ana­lysed (445 ng g¡1 wet wt.). )PCB con­cen­tra­tion in the liver of the only spec­im ­ en of C. my­das ana­lysed was lower (116 ng g¡1 wet wt.) than those detected in log­ger­heads and leath­ er­back tur­tles. Log­ger­heads also showed the high­est )PCB mean con­cen­tra­tion in the adi­pose tis­sue (450 ± 1700 ng g¡1 wet wt.). Log­ger­heads showed the high­est hepatic PCB 209 mean con­ cen­tra­tion (1200 ± 3120 ng g¡1 wet wt.), fol­lowed by the only spec­i­men of D. co­ri­a­cea ana­lysed (530 ng g¡1 wet wt.). How­ever, the leath­er­back showed the high­est PCB 209 con­cen­tra­tion in the adi­pose tis­sue (500 ng g¡1 wet wt.). Six log­ger­head tur­tles had indi­vid­ual PCB con­cen­tra­tions higher than 2000 ng g¡1, and seven tur­tles showed indi­vid­ual PCB con­cen­tra­tions higher than 900 ng g¡1. All these tur­tles showed severe sep­ti­cae­mia and/or severe cachexia.

PCB 138 PCB 153 PCB 180 PCB 209

Che­lo­nia my­das n = 1

Liver

Fat

BDL – 34900 1980 ± 5320 BDL – 590 42 ± 131 BDL – 1000 98 ± 262 BDL – 670 32 ± 130 BDL – 13300 456 ± 2426 BDL – 15440 915 ± 3180 BDL – 3890 440 ± 1016 BDL – 14900 1200 ± 3120

BDL – 9800 450 ± 1700 BDL – 38 3.8 ± 9 BDL – 56 5.5 ± 12.5 BDL – 84.5 6 ± 19 BDL – 2040 83 ± 370.5 BDL – 2600 133 ± 477 BDL – 5006 217 ± 907 BDL – 218 15 ± 45.5

Derm­oche­lys co­ri­a­cea n = 1

Liver

Fat

Liver

Fat

116

144

445

77

BDL

5.7

71.5

9.7

BDL

7.3

8.7

11.4

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

58

251

56

116

73

114

BDL

BDL

BDL

530

500

BDL: below detec­tion limit.

)PCB = sum of PCBs nos. 28, 52, 101, 138, 153, and 180.

As revealed by sta­tis­ti­cal anal­y­sis, tur­tles showed sig­nif­i­cant higher PCBs 28,31, PCB 153, PCB 209 and )PCBs con­cen­tra­tions in the liver than in the adi­pose tis­sue. How­ever, no sig­nif­i­cant dif­ fer­ences between con­cen­tra­tions in both tis­sues were detected for PCB 138 and PCB 180. The con­ge­ner most fre­quently detected in the liver was PCB 180 (46.8%), fol­lowed by PCB 153 (31.2%), PCBs 28, 31 (25%), PCB 52 (25%), PCB 209 (15.6%), PCB 138 (15.6%), and PCB 101 (12.5%). The cong­en­ers most fre­quently detected in the adi­pose tis­sue were PCB 180 (50%) and PCB 153 (50%), fol­lowed by PCBs 28,31 (34.4%), PCB 52 (34.4%), PCB 209 (31.2%), PCB 138 (28.1%), and PCB 101 (18.7%). PCB pro­files in the C. ca­ret­ta tis­sues were dom­i­nated by the higher chlo­ri­nated cong­en­ers (Fig. 1). Hexa­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCBs 138 and 153) were pre­dom­i­nant and accounted for 43.6% of the total PCBs, fol­lowed by deca­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCB 209) (33%) and hep­ta­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCB 180) (18%). Tet­ra­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCB 52) accounted for 3% of the total PCBs, and tri­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCBs 28 and 31) accounted for 1.3% of the total res­i­due. Con­cern­ ing indi­vid­ual cong­en­ers, the most abun­dant was PCB 209 (33%) fol­lowed by PCB 153 (29%), PCB 180 (18%), and PCB 138 (15%). The iso­mer pattern of PCBs in C. ca­ret­ta was dif­fer­ent in the liver and the fat. In the liver, the most abun­dant was PCB 209 (37.6%), fol­ lowed by PCB 153 (29%), PCB 138 (14%) and PCB 180 (14%). In the fat, the most abun­dant was PCB 180 (47%), fol­lowed by PCB 153 (28.6%), PCB 138 (18%) and PCB 209 (3%).

3Cl

4Cl

5Cl

6Cl

7Cl

10Cl

C. caretta (liver) C. caretta (fat) C. mydas (liver) C. mydas (fat) D. coriacea (liver) D. coriacea (fat) 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Fig. 1. Fin­ger­prints of liver and fat of the three spe­cies of sea tur­tles ana­lysed.

476

J. Orós et al. / Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

Regard­ing PCB pro­files in the only spec­i­men of C. my­das ana­ lysed, the most abun­dant was PCB 180 (73%) fol­lowed by PCB 153 (22%) and PCB52 (3%). Although PCB 180 was the most abun­dant in both tis­sues, this con­ge­ner was the only PCB detected in the liver of this tur­tle. Regard­ing PCB pro­files in the only spec­i­men of D. co­ri­a­cea ana­ lysed, the most abun­dant was PCB 209 (66%) fol­lowed by PCB 153 (20%) and PCB 180 (7%). The iso­mer pattern of PCBs in this tur­ tle was slightly dif­fer­ent in the liver and the fat. In the liver, the most abun­dant was PCB 209 (54%) fol­lowed by PCB 153 (26%) and PCB 180 (12%). In the fat, the most abun­dant was PCB 209 (87%), ­fol­lowed by PCB 153 (10%), and PCB 52 (2%). Hepatic )PCBs con­cen­tra­tions were pos­i­tively cor­re­lated with cachexia (r = 0.250, P = 0.04). No sig­nif­i­cant cor­re­la­tion was observed between )PCBs con­cen­tra­tions and sep­ti­cae­mia. 4. Dis­cus­sion The pres­ent study rep­re­sents the first data of PCB lev­els for any tur­tle spe­cies from the Canary Islands. The tur­tle tis­sues ana­lysed in the cur­rent inves­ti­ga­tion con­tained high lev­els of PCBs com­ pared to con­cen­tra­tions reported in tur­tles col­lected in other loca­ tions around the world (Table 4) (McKim and John­son, 1983; Lake et al., 1994; Ry­bit­ski et al., 1995; Mcken­zie et al., 1999; Cor­so­li­ni et al., 2000; Stor­el­li and Mar­cot­ri­gi­ano, 2000; Gard­ner et al., 2003; Kel­ler et al., 2004; Pe­ru­gin­i et al., 2006; Stor­el­li et al., 2007). The high degree of var­ia ­ ­tion of con­cen­tra­tions of PCBs detected in our study may be attrib­uted to the dif­fer­ent expo­sure of

i­ ­ndi­vid­ual tur­tles to pol­lu­tants and to the phys­i­cal con­di­tion of the ani­mals. Sea tur­tles visit dif­fer­ent areas with dif­fer­ent degree of con­tam­i­na­tion dur­ing migra­tion, result­ing in dif­fer­ences in expo­ sure for each ani­mal (Zisw­il­er, 1986). Accord­ing to recent stud­ies, log­ger­head tur­tles stranded on the coasts of the Canary Islands come from two dif­fer­ent migra­tion routes: from the Western Atlan­tic arriv­ing to the Canary Islands by the Gulf Stream (PérezJimé­nez, 1997), and from Cape Verde (Del­lin­ger, 2006). In addi­tion, tur­tles included in this study var­ied widely in phys­i­cal con­di­tion, rang­ing from tur­tles that had been killed inci­den­tally through human inter­ac­tion to tur­tles that showed severe ema­ci­a­tion and sep­ti­cae­mia after pro­longed ill­ness. Six log­ger­head tur­tles had indi­vid­ual PCB con­cen­tra­tions higher than the quan­ti­fi­ca­tion limit of 2000 ng g¡1 estab­lished by the Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion (FDA). In addi­tion, seven tur­tles showed indi­vid­ual PCB con­cen­tra­tions higher than 900 ng g¡1. All these tur­tles showed severe sep­ti­cae­mia and/or severe cachexia. Sta­tis­ti­cally, a positive cor­re­la­tion was detected between )PCBs con­cen­tra­tion and cachexia. Although sea tur­tles are long-living high tro­phic organ­isms that would be expected to con­tain high con­cen­tra­tions of PCBs (Lake et al., 1994), we think the poor phys­i­cal con­di­tion of these ani­mals could be the reason for these high PCB lev­els. It has been described that in ceta­ceans many dis­eases affect met­a­bolic cen­tres and thus the capac­ity to me­tab­o­lise or excrete pol­lu­tants may be affected, ques­tion­ing whether PCB con­cen­tra­tions in the tis­sues of these spec­i­mens are rep­re­sen­ta­tive of nor­mal con­di­tions (Ag­u­i­lar et al., 1999).

Table 4 PCB con­cen­tra­tions (aver­age con­cen­tra­tion or range, ng g¡1 wet wt.) in hepatic and adi­pose tis­sue sam­ples from sea tur­tles reported by other authors Spe­cies

Local­ity

Tis­sue (n) )PCB

PCB 118

PCB 138

PCB 153

PCB 180

Ref­er­ence

L. kempi

Long Island Vir­ginia and North Car­o­lina

98.3 148.9 BDL-59.5

114.94 195 BDL-65.8

170.04 272.5 2.04–152

53.62 102.7 BDL-49.4

Lake et al. (1994)

C. ca­ret­ta

Liver (22) 512.6 Fat (13) 863 Liver (18) 7.46–514 Fat (20) Liver (3) Fat (3) Liver (4)

55.4–1730 158–608 90.4–904 50–102

<0.5–<1.6

<0.5–<1.6

<0.5–3.4

4.55–193 14.8–18.7 19.4–91.9 3.3–8.7

3.77–236 26.1–35.6 38.9–156 12–24

12.1–406 43.1–259 90.4–283 13–29

BDL-148 10.3–19.5 19.1–64 7.3–18

Fat (3) Liver (1) Liver (2) Fat (2) Liver (9)

775–893 159 3.1–3.7 47–178 <1.1–77

<4.8–<8.0 <0.9 <0.6–<0.8 <4.7–<7.2 <0.7–<3.4

8.6–37 15 2.2–3.9 12 0.7–4.3

8–32 16 <0.6–<0.8 5.8–<7.2 0.9–7.4

54–71 12 <0.6–2.8 <7.2–8.3 <0.7–4.8

132–169 20 <0.6–0.8 <7.2–25 <1.1–11

229–261 24 1.3–1.5 7.8–46 <1.1–13

73–154 12 <0.6–<0.8 <7.2–24 <1.1–7.4

<2.2–<3.7

13.25

5.7–33

<2.2–27

<2.2–28

<2.2–3.2

<2.2–13

L. kempi C. ca­ret­ta

Med­i­ter­ra­nean Sea

C. ca­ret­ta Scot­land D. co­ri­a­cea Scot­land C. my­das

Med­i­ter­ra­nean Sea

C. ca­ret­ta

Adri­at­ic Sea

Fat (3) Liver (11)

C. ca­ret­ta

Adri­at­ic Sea

Liver (4)

39–261 3.22–6.54A,a 0.21–0.76A,b 119

C. my­das

Baja Cal­i­for­nia pen­in­sula

Fat (4) Liver (7)

334 BDL-44.7

Fat (7) Liver (1) Fat (1) Liver (1) Fat (1) Fat (44) Liver (11)

BDL-49.5 58.1 18.4 41 BDL 2010 ± 2960B 83 7.6–247.3

L. oliv­a­cea C. ca­ret­ta C. ca­ret­ta C. ca­ret­ta

North Car­o­lina Adri­at­ic Sea

Fat (11) C. ca­ret­ta

Adri­at­ic Sea

459.7 2.9–1472.1 Liver (19) 6.85–297.49

BDL: below detec­tion limit. A Value expressed as mg kg¡1 lipid weight. B Value expressed as ng g¡1 lipid weight. a Young tur­tles. b Adult tur­tles.

PCB 28

PCB 52

PCB 101

4.68–11.10

14.25–42.82

17.84–45.50

868–28.83

9.55–36.97

23.78–103.70 31.15–134.46 19.60–78.10

Ry­bit­ski et al. (1995)

Mcken­zie et al. (1999)

Stor­el­li and Mar­ cot­ri­gi­ano (2000) Cor­so­li­ni et al. (2000) Gard­ner et al. (2003)

11 1.1–26.5 62.4 0.33–150.8

26.7 2.2–92.9 24.5 2.5–75.7 115.8 115 0.6–294.2 0.6–369.2

Kel­ler et al. (2004) Pe­ru­gin­i et al. (2006)

Stor­el­li et al. (2007)

J. Orós et al. / Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

ng/g wet wt



2000 1500 1000

Fat

500

Liver

0

C. caretta

C. mydas

D. coriacea

ng/g wet wt

2000 1500 1000

Fat

500

Liver

0

C. caretta

C. mydas

D. coriacea

Fig. 2. )PCB (IU­PAC nos. 28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180) mean con­cen­tra­tions (a) and PCB 209 mean con­cen­tra­tions (b) in the hepatic and adi­pose tis­sue sam­ples of the three spe­cies of sea tur­tles ana­lysed.

Accord­ing to other authors, the pattern of tis­sue dis­tri­bu­tion of PCBs reported in tur­tles and other marine spe­cies is as fol­lows: adi­pose tis­sue > liver > kid­ney > muscle (Tan­ab ­ e et al., 1983; Mar­ti­ neau et al., 1987; Col­born and Clem­ent, 1992; Ry­bit­ski et al., 1995; Mcken­zie et al., 1999). This is attrib­uted to the high­est total lipid con­tent and tri­glyc­er­ides for the adi­pose tis­sues and the strong cor­re­la­tions between these and their bur­den of lipo­philic pol­lu­ tants (Cock­croft et al., 1989). How­ever, we detected higher )PCBs con­cen­tra­tions in the liver than in the adi­pose tis­sue (Fig. 2). Thir­ teen tur­tles showed higher PCB lev­els in the liver than in the fat. All these tur­tles showed severe cachexia and/or sep­ti­cae­mia. Accord­ ing to dif­fer­ent stud­ies, ani­mals with abun­dant fat depos­its can accu­mu­late and tol­er­ate higher con­cen­tra­tions of toxic chem­i­cals because lipo­philic pol­lu­tants are stored in the adi­pose tis­sue and are less avail­able to tar­get organs and recep­tors. In con­trast, ema­ ci­ated ani­mals which have mo­bi­lised their lipid stores may be more sus­cep­ti­ble to toxic effects as a result of re­mo­bil­i­sa­tion of the pol­lu­tants, result­ing in higher con­cen­tra­tions of PCBs in the remain­ing tis­sues such as the liver (Bernh­oft and Ska­are, 1994). Thus, the cachexia observed in our tur­tles may indi­cate a pre­vi­ous re­mo­bil­is­ a­tion of the fat and the pol­lu­tants, and could explain the high con­cen­tra­tion of PCBs in the liver. In addi­tion, the sep­ti­cae­ mic con­di­tion reported in these tur­tles could be caused by a pos­si­ ble inm­un­osu­pres­sion as one of the most dis­tin­guished effects of orga­no­chlo­rine com­pounds. In our study, PCB pro­files in the C. ca­ret­ta tis­sues were dom­i­ nated by the higher chlo­ri­nated cong­en­ers (Fig. 1). Hexa­clo­ro­bi­ phe­nyls and hep­ta­clo­ro­bi­phe­nyls are pre­dom­in ­ ant in tur­tles and marine mam­mals (Muir et al., 1988; Ry­bit­ski et al., 1995; Col­born and Smo­len, 1996; Alam and Brim, 2000; Cor­so­li­ni et al., 2000; Stor­el­li and Mar­cot­ri­gi­ano, 2000; Miao et al., 2001; Pe­ru­gin­i et al., 2006; Stor­el­li et al., 2007). How­ever, Gard­ner et al. (2003) reported in C. my­das a pro­file dom­in ­ ated by lower-chlo­ri­nated cong­en­ers. Dif­fer­ences in PCB pat­terns in tur­tles may be attrib­uted to dif­ fer­ences in the con­ge­ner com­po­si­tions of envi­ron­men­tal media among regions, die­tary dif­fer­ences or dif­fer­ences in the abil­i­ties of the var­i­ous spe­cies and pop­u­la­tions to metab­o­lize PCBs (Gard­ner et al., 2003). In our study, the con­cen­tra­tions and fre­quen­cies of detec­tion of PCB 209 were remark­able. Usu­ally, pub­lished reports do not

477

include this con­ge­ner. Gard­ner et al. (2003) detected very low con­cen­tra­tions of PCB 209 fol­low­ing a decreas­ing order in muscle, liver and adi­pose tis­sue of tur­tles. Stor­el­li et al. (2007) reported in a study on 19 log­ger­head tur­tles that PCB 209 accounted only for 0.1–1.6% of total PCBs. One of our objec­tives was to estab­lish a pos­si­ble rela­tion­ship between PCBs con­cen­tra­tions and the causes of death of each tur­ tle. It was dif ­fi­cult to assess the impact of or­ga­nochh­o­rine com­ pounds in the tur­tles of our study because the most fre­quent causes of death (72%) were attrib­uted to fish­ing activ­ity. In addi­ tion, few tox­i­co­log­i­cal stud­ies have been pub­lished regard­ing or­ga­nochl­o­rines in rep­tiles and no safe con­cen­tra­tions have been estab­lished. It is remark­able that almost all tur­tles with severe sep­ti­cae­mia showed very high lev­els of PCBs. Imm­un­osu­pres­sion as result of PCBs pol­lu­tion has been pre­vi­ously described (Kel­ler et al., 2004, 2006). How­ever, in our study the pres­ence of other fac­tors dif­fer­ent to PCBs con­cen­tra­tions, such as inci­den­tal fish­ ing, nutri­tional sta­tus, and expo­si­tion to dif­fer­ent micro-organ­ isms, make it dif ­fi­cult to estab­lish a clear asso­ci­a­tion between PCB con­cen­tra­tions and causes of death. Accord­ing to the his­to­pa­thol­ o­gical study no lesions exclu­sively attrib­uted to acute effects of PCBs were described. All the his­to­log­i­cal lesions were attrib­uted to bac­te­rial and/or fun­gal infec­tions mainly asso­ci­ated with gross lesions caused by fish­ing activ­ity. How­ever, chronic effects of PCBs are much dif ­fi­cult to deter­mine. While there was an insuf ­fi­cient num­ber of sam­ples to assess dif­fer­ences among spe­cies, qual­i­ta­tive eval­u­a­tion could indi­cate the potential effects of poor phys­i­cal con­di­tion dif­fer­ences among indi­vid­u­als of C. ca­ret­ta and subsequent poor met­a­bolic per­for­ mance of detox­i­fi­ca­tion sys­tems. In addi­tion, the detec­tion of high lev­els of PCBs in these tur­tles makes it nec­es­sary to con­tinue to mon­i­tor the lev­els of these chem­i­cals in tur­tles from the Canary Islands to con­trib­ute to the pro­tec­tion of these cur­rently endan­ gered spe­cies. Acknowl­edge­ments The authors would like to thank mem­bers of the Con­se­jería de Medio Am­bi­ente, Ca­bil­do de Gran Cana­ria, for pro­vid­ing the ­tur­tles. This inves­ti­ga­tion was par­tially sup­ported by the national pro­ject I + D REN2000-1753 MAR. Ref­er­ences Ag­u­i­lar, A., Bor­rel, A., Pas­tor, T., 1999. Bio­log­ic­ al fac­tors affect­ing var­i­abil­ity of per­sis­tent pol­lu­tant lev­els in ceta­ceans. J. Ceta­cean Res. Man­age. 1, 83–116. Alam, S.K., Brim, M.S., 2000. Orga­no­chlo­rine, PCB, PAH, and metal con­cen­tra­tions in eggs of log­ger­head sea tur­tles (Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta) from north­west Flor­ida, USA. J. Envi­ron. Sci. Health 35, 705–724. Ahl­borg, U.G., Bec­king, G.C., Birn­baum, L.S., Brou­wer, a., Der­ks, H.J.G.M., Fee­ley, M., Go­lor, G., Han­berg, A., Lar­sen, J.C., Liem, A.K.D., Safe, S.H., Schlat­ter, C., Wa­ern, F., Yo­un­es, M., Yr­jänheikki, E., 1994. Toxic equiv­a­lency fac­tors for dioxin-like PCBs: report on WHO-ECEH and IPCS con­sul­ta­tion, Decem­ber 1993. Che­mo­sphere 28, 1049–1067. Ban­croft, J.D., Ste­vens, A., 1996. The­ory and Practice of His­to­log­i­cal Tech­niques, fourth ed. Chur­chill Liv­ing­stone, New York. Bernh­oft, A., Ska­are, J.U., 1994. Lev­els of selected indi­vid­ual poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­ nyls in dif­fer­ent tis­sues of har­bour seals (Phoc­a vi­tu­li­na) from the south­ern coast of Nor­way. Envi­ron. Pol­lut. 86, 99–107. Bjorn­dal, K.A., Bol­ten, A.B., Ko­ike, B., Sch­roe­der, B.A., Shaver, D.I., Teas, W.G., W ­ itz­ell, W.N., 2001. Somatic growth func­tion for imma­ture log­ger­head sea tur­tles, Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta, in south­east­ern US waters – Sta­tis­ti­cal Data included.. Fish. Bull. 99, 240–246. Blanco, J.C., Gon­zález, J.L., 1992. Li­bro rojo de los ver­te­bra­dos es­pañ­oles. Min­is­te­rio de Ag­ri­cul­tur­a, Pes­ca y Al­i­men­ta­ción. Cole­cción Téc­nica IC­ONA, Madrid. Cock­croft, V.G., De Kock, A.C., Lord, D.A., Ross, G.J.B., 1989. Or­ga­nochl­or­ ines in bot­ tle­nose dol­phins (Tursi­ops trunc­a­tus) from the east coast of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 8, 207–217. Col­born, T., Clem­ent, C., 1992. Chem­i­cally Induced Alter­a­tions in Sex­ual and Func­ tional Devel­op­ment: The Wild­life/human Con­nec­tion. Prince­ton Sci­en­tific Pub­ lish­ing, Princen­ton, New Jer­sey.

478

J. Orós et al. / Chemosphere 74 (2009) 473–478

Col­born, T., Smo­len, M.J., 1996. Epi­de­mi­ol­ og­i­cal anal­y­sis of per­sis­tent orga­no­ chlo­rine con­tam­i­nants in ceta­ceans. Rev. Envi­ron. Con­tam. Tox­i­col. 146, 91–172. Cor­so­li­ni, S., Au­ri­gi, S., Fo­car­di, S., 2000. Pres­ence of poly­chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls (PCBs) and copla­nar cong­en­ers in the tis­sues of the Med­i­ter­ra­nean log­ger­head tur­tle Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta. Mar. Pol­lut. Bull. 40, 952–960. Del­lin­ger, T., 2006. Vida no mar alto: os ju­ve­nis pel­ág­i­cos das tar­taru­gas mari­nhas no At­lân­ti­co. In: Pro­ceed­ings IX Cong­res­o Luso-Es­pa­ñol de Her­pe­to­log­ía. San Se­bas­tián, Spain, pp. 27–28. Fox, G.A., 2001. Wild­life as sen­ti­nels of human health effects in the Great Lakes-St. Law­rence Basin. Envi­ron. Health Per­spect. 109, 853–861. Frick, M.G., 1996. A Guide for the Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of Stranded Dead Tur­tles: The East­ ern United States and the Gulf of Mex­ico. Sa­va­nah Sci­ence Museum Spe­cial Pub­li­ca­tion. Gard­ner, S.C., Pier, M.D., Wess­el­man, R., Ju­árez, J.A., 2003. Orga­no­chlo­rine con­ tam­i­nants in sea tur­tles from the East­ern Pacific. Mar. Pol­lut. Bull. 46, 1082– 1089. I.U.C.N./S.S.C., 2007. 2007 I.U.C.N. Red List of threatened Spe­cies. (accessed 02.12.07). Kel­ler, J.M., Ku­ck­lick, J.R., Harms, C.A., McCle­llan-Green, P.D., 2004. Orga­no­chlo­rine con­tam­i­nants in sea tur­tles: cor­re­la­tions between whole blood and fat. Envi­ron. Tox­i­col. Chem. 23, 726–738. Kel­ler, J.M., McCle­llan-Green, P., Ku­ck­lick, J.R., Keil, D.E., Pe­den-Adams, M.M., 2006. Effects of orga­no­chlo­rine con­tam­i­nants on log­ger­head sea tur­tle immu­nity: com­par­i­son of a cor­rel­a­tive field study and in vitro expo­sure exper­i­ments. Envi­ ron. Health Per­spect. 114, 70–76. Lake, J.L., Hae­bler, R., Mc­Kin­ney, R., Lake, C.A., Sa­dove, S.S., 1994. PCBs and other chlo­ri­nated organic con­tam­i­nants in tis­sues of juve­nile Kemp’s rid­ley tur­tles (Le­pid­oche­lys kempi). Mar. Envi­ron. Res. 38, 313–327. López-Ju­ra­do, L.F., Gon­zález, S., 1983. Las tor­tu­gas en Cana­rias. Ag­u­ayro 147, 29– 31. Mar­ti­neau, D., Be­land, P., Des­jar­dins, C., Leg­ace, A., 1987. Lev­els of orga­no­chlo­ rine chem­i­cals in tis­sues of beluga whales (Del­phin­apte­rus leu­cas) from the St. Law­rence Estu­ary, Que­b ec, Can­ada. Arch Envi­ron. Con­tam. Tox­i­col. 16, 137–147. Mateo, J.A., And­reu, A.C., López-Ju­ra­do, L.F., 1997. Las tor­tu­gas mari­nas de la Pen­ín­ su­la Ibé­ri­ca, Bale­ares, Az­ores, Madeira y Cana­rias: In­tro­duc­ción. In: Ple­gu­e­zu­e­ los, J.M. (Ed.), Dis­trib­u­ción y Bi­og­eografía de los An­fib­i­os y Rep­tiles en Es­pa­ña y Por­tu­gal. Uni­vers­i­dad de Gra­nada Edi­to­rial, Gra­nada, pp. 433–434. Mcken­zie, C., God­ley, B.J., Fur­ness, R.W., Wells, D.E., 1999. Con­cen­tra­tions and pat­ terns of orga­no­chlo­rine con­tam­in ­ ants in marine tur­tles from Med­i­ter­ra­nean and Atlan­tic waters. Mar. Envi­ron. Res. 47, 117–135. McKim Jr., J.M., John­son, K.L., 1983. Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls and p,p’ -DDE in ­log­ger­head and green po­stye­ar­ling Atlan­tic sea tur­tles. Bull. Envi­ron. Con­tam. Tox­i­col. 31, 53–60.

Miao, X., Ba­lazs, G.H., Mu­rak­a­wa, S.K.K., Li, Q., 2001. Con­ge­ner-spe­cific pro­file and tox­ic­ity assess­ment of PCBs in green tur­tles (Che­lo­nia my­das) from the Hawai­ian Islands. Sci. Total Envi­ron. 281, 247–253. Muir, D.C.G., Nor­strom, R.J., Simon, M., 1988. Orga­no­chlo­rine con­tam­i­nants in Arc­ tic marine food chain: accu­mu­la­tion of spe­cific poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls and chlor­dane-related com­pounds. Envi­ron. Sci. Tech­nol. 22, 1071–1079. Orós, J., Cal­a­buig, P., Déniz, S., 2004. Diges­tive pathol­ogy of sea tur­tles stranded in the Canary Islands between 1993 and 2001. Vet. Rec. 155, 169–174. Orós, J., Tor­rent, A., 2001. Man­ual de nec­rop­sia de tor­tu­gas mari­nas. E­dici­ones del Ca­bil­do de Gran Cana­ria, Las Pal­mas de G. C. Orós, J., Tor­rent, A., Cal­a­buig, P., Déniz, S., 2005. Dis­eases and causes of mor­tal­ ity among sea tur­tles stranded in the Canary Islands Spain (1998–2001). Dis. Aquat. Org. 63, 13–24. Pérez-Jimé­nez, A., 1997. Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta (Lin­naeus, 1758). In: Ple­gu­ez ­ u­e­los, J.M. (Ed.), Dis­trib­u­ción y Bi­og­eografía de los An­fib­io ­ s y Rep­tiles en Es­pa­ña y Por­tu­gal. Uni­ vers­i­dad de Gra­nada, Gra­nada, Spain, pp. 435–437. Pe­ru­gin­i, M., Gia­mma­ri­no, A., Olivi­eri, V., Gu­cci­one, S., Lai, O.R., Amo­re­na, M., 2006. Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls and orga­no­chlo­rine pes­ti­ci­da lev­els in tis­sues of Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta from the Adri­at­ic Sea. Dis. Aquat. Org. 71, 155–161. Prit­chard, P.C.H., 1997. Evo­lu­tion, phy­log­eny, and cur­rent sta­tus. In: Lutz, P.L., Mu­sick, J.A. (Eds.), The Biol­ogy of Sea Tur­tles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Flor­ida, pp. 1–28. Ry­bit­ski, M.J., Hale, R.C., Mu­sick, J.A., 1995. Dis­tri­bu­tion of orga­no­chlo­rine pol­lu­ tants in Atlan­tic sea tur­tles. Co­pe­ia 2, 379–390. Semi­noff, J.A., Re­sen­diz, A., Re­sen­diz, B., Nic­hols, W.J., 2004. Ocur­rence of log­ger­ head sea tur­tles (Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta) in the Gulf of Cal­i­for­nia, Mex­ico: evi­dence of life- his­tory var­i­a­tion in the Pacific Ocean. Her­pe­tol. Rev. 35, 24–27. Stor­el­li, M.M., Mar­cot­ri­gi­ano, G.O., 2000. Chlo­ro­bi­phe­nyls, HCB, and orga­no­chlo­ rine pes­ti­cides in some tis­sues of Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta (Lin­naeus) spec­i­mens beached along the Adri­at­ic Sea, Italy. Bull. Envi­ron. Con­tam. Tox­i­col. 64, 481–488. Stor­el­li, M.M., Ba­rone, G., Mar­cot­ri­gi­ano, G.O., 2007. Poly­chlo­ri­nated biphe­nyls and other chlo­ri­nated organic con­tam­i­nants in the tis­sues of Med­i­ter­ra­nean log­ger­ head tur­tle Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta. Sci. Total Envi­ron. 373, 456–463. Tan­a­be, S., Hi­daka, H., Tat­suk­a­wa, R., 1983. PCBs and chlo­ri­nated pes­ti­cides in Ant­ arc­tic atmo­sphere and hydro­sphere. Che­mo­sphere 12, 277–288. Tan­a­be, S., Sung, J.K., Choi, D.Y., Baba, N., Ki­yota, M., Tat­suk­a­wa, R., 1994. Per­sis­ tent orga­no­chlo­rine res­i­dues in north­ern fur seal from the Pacific coast of Japan since 1971. Envi­ron. Pol­lut. 85, 305–314. Tor­rent, A., Gon­zález-Díaz, O.M., Mon­ag ­ as, P., Orós, J., 2004. Tis­sue dis­tri­bu­tion of met­als in log­ger­head tur­tles (Ca­ret­ta ca­ret­ta) stranded in the Canary Islands Spain. Mar. Pol­lut. Bull. 49, 854–874. Wol­ke, R.E., George, A., 1981. Sea tur­tle nec­ropsy man­ual, In: NOAA Tech­ni­cal Mem­ o­ran­dum NMFS-SEFC-24, National Oce­anic and Atmo­spheric Admin­is­tra­tion, Kings­ton, RI. Zisw­il­er, V., 1986. Clase Rep­tiles Rep­tilia. In: Omega (Ed.), Zoo­log­ía espe­cial Ver­te­ bra­dos Tomo II: Am­nio­tas. Bar­ce­lona, Spain, pp. 23–72.