Influence of Nitrogen Feed Content On The Performances of A Zeolite Hydrocracking Catalyst

Influence of Nitrogen Feed Content On The Performances of A Zeolite Hydrocracking Catalyst

D.L. Trimm et al. (Editors), Catalysts in Petroleum Refining 1989 0 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam -Printed in The Netherlands 301 ...

716KB Sizes 54 Downloads 34 Views

D.L. Trimm et al. (Editors), Catalysts in Petroleum Refining 1989 0 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam -Printed in The Netherlands

301

INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FEED CONTENT O N THE PERFORMANCES OF A ZEOLITE HYDROCRACKING CATALYST P. DUFRESNE, A. QUESADA AND S. MIGNARD Institut Francais du Petrole, BP 311, 92506, Rueil Malmaison, (France) ABSTRACT

Hydrocracker feeds are usually rich in nitrogen compounds. These are partially transformed by the first-step hydrotreatment catalysts, creating an ammonia pressure in the reactors. This paper shows the effects of ammonia pressure on the performances of a zeolite hydrocracking catalyst. Ammonia has a strong negative effect on the activity for n-heptane conversion, especially at low ammonia pressures. Adsorption of ammonia on the acidic sites of the zeolite is quickly reversible for a wide range of pressure. However, at zero pressure, ammonia desorption is slow, meaning that the molecule remains strongly adsorbed on the most acidic sites of the zeolite. Ammonia also modifies strongly the products selectivity. Iso-heptane yield is increased to the expense of cracked products yield. INTRODUCTION

Vacuum gas oil hydrocracking is now a major conversion process in the refining industry. One of its main qualities is flexibility. Different types of feeedstocks can be converted into various types of valuable products (1,2,3). The catalyst is one of the key aspects of the process and the merits of a given hydrocracking process largely depend on the catalyst’s qualities. These are exprressed by three main criteria: (1) selectivity or type of yield obtained, (2) activity or temperature for a given conversion level and (3) stability or aging rate. There is a strong incentive today to process more and more refractory feedstocks in order to improve the economics of the process. The feed’s refractory nature can be described by various parameters. Feed heaviness can be characterized by the molecular weight or the midand final boiling points. Composition is also a significant parameter i.e. paraffins, naphthanes, aromatics content and, for non straight-run feeds such as recycle oil from catalytic cracking or coker gas oil, olefin content. The heteroatom content, sulfur and especially nitrogen are also very important points to be considered in feed evaluation. Metals and asphaltenes are not considered here since they usually must not be present in a conventional hydrocracker feed. The specifications for metal content are often less than 1 ppm. These parameters are interconnected. For example an increase in feed molecular weight often accompanies an increase in the aromatics, especially polyaromatics, content. Heavy feeds are more refractory than light ones because of the greater concentration of poisonous molecules rather than the increase in the mean carbon number.

302

For a given hydrocracker. the only parameter enabling more refractory feedstocks to be processed is often the catalyst type. An improvement in catalyst performance goes via a good understanding of the phenomena involved in processing difficult feeds. This paper deals with the effects of nitrogen feed content on catalyst performance. GENERAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM OF NITROGEN FEED CONTENT A hydrocracking process usually consists of two different steps, whatever the reactor arrangement is used, i.e. "single-stage'' or "two-stage''process, as shown in Figure 1. Reactions occurring in the first step are mainly hydrodesulfurization (HDS), hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) and aromatics hydrogenation (HDA). They are promoted by a hydrotreatment catalyst. In sore cases, a hydrocracking catalyst can also be placed in the first step in order to initiate' cracking reactions. The most critical reaction in that step is HDN because the outlet effluent must respect a severe nitrogen-content specification. Indeed,the acidic function of hydrocracking catalysts, especially when they contain zeolites, can be strongly poisoned by heavy nitrogen-containing molecules. Depending on the licensors recommandations. the value i s typically between 1 and 30 ppm. Clearly, conditions to obtain for instance, 5 ppm at the first step outlet will be very different when starting from a feed containing 200 or 2000 ppm, which are the two extreme values of standard VGO hydrocracker feeds. A nitrogen-rich feed has to be processed under conditions of high hydrogen pressure and/or low space velocity. For a given unit, the only operating parameter is temperature. However,the HDN reaction, as well as the HDA reaction, is bound to a thermodynamic equilibrium, because the first reaction step is the nitrogen-containing ring saturation. Temperature thus has a limited effect

(4). The main reactions occurring in the second step are hydroisomerization and hydrocracking. They are promoted by a more acidic hydrocracking catalyst, containing amorphous silica-alumina or zeolite. However, depending on the type of process used, the second step conditions may be very different (3.5). In the single-stage arrangement, the liquid and gaseous effluents coming from the first step go to the second step. Thus, a hydrocracking catalyst must deal with the large amount of ammonia produced upstream, with ammonia partial pressure typically being between 5 and 30 kPa. In the two-stage arrangement, the effluents are fractionated after the first step.

303

ONE- STAGE PROCESS FRACTIONATION MAKE UP H2

H2 RECYCLE

_ 1

1 or 2 REACTORS r-- i

v A

FRESH FEED

I

- L,,1 J-

I

1

I

I

I

I I

--L-----L-

---..---SEPARATION

I

RESIDUE RECYCLE

TWO- STAGE PROCESS MAKE UP H2

H2 RECYCLE

d =

PSTAGE

FRACTIONATION

REACTOR

FRESH FEED

i If

b

2ndSTAGE

SEPARATION

1

RESIDUE RECYCLE

Fig.

So with

1 only

. Typical the

configuration.

c)FUEL

OIL

hydrocracking p r o c e s s flow-schemes

unconverted,

ammonia-free

considerably

--

lower

b u t h y d r o t r e a t e d . r e s i d u e e n t e r s t h e second s t e p

hydrogen. ammonia

Hydrocracking partial

c a t a l y s t s can t h u s o p e r a t e a t a

presmre

than

in

the

single-stage

304

The chemistry o f hydrocracking and e s p e c i a l l y t h e r e a c t i o n s of p a r a f f i n s on b i f u n c t i o n n a l hydrocracking c a t a l y s t s have been e x t e n s i v e l y s t u d i e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e , and good reviews have a l r e a d y been p u b l i s h e d (6,7,8).The transformation

of

paraffins

i m p l i e s t h e independent a c t i o n o f two t y p e s of

c a t a l y t i c s i t e s , i . e . hydrogenating and a c i d i c s i t e s (9). On t h e f i r s t o n e s , p a r a f f i n s are transformed i n t o o l e f i n i c i n t e r m e d i a t e s , which are s u b s e q u e n t l y adsorbed on a c i d i c sites as carbenium i o n s . These i o n s are t h e n i s o m e r i z e d ,

are

and

desorbed from t h e p r o t o n i c s i t e as an i s o - o l e f i n ( i s o m e r i z a t i o n ) or

as two fragments ( c r a c k i n g )

.

I n most c a s e s , t h e m e c h a n i s t i c ( 1 0 , l l ) as well as t h e k i n e t i c ( 1 2 ) s t u d i e s r e p o r t e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e have used c a t a l y s t s made o f z e o l i t e s l o a d e d w i t h a noble m e t a l , such as platinum o r palladium. The r e a c t i o n o f a long-chain on t h i s t y p e o f system r e s u l t s i n a h i g h s e l e c t i v i t y t o isomers a t or medium conversion rates, and t h i s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c f e a t u r e h a s been r e f e r r e d t o as " i d e a l h y d r o c r a c k i n g " ( 8 ) . It is t y p i c a l o f a b i f u n c t i o n a l

paraffin low

c a t a l y s t having noble metal i n

a v e r y h i g h hydrogenation f u n c t i o n , which i s t h e c a s e of a s u l f u r and n i t r o g e n f r e e environment. However, a c t u a l hydrocracking c o n d i t i o n s i n v o l v e h i g h p a r t i a l p r e s s u r e s of s u l f u r and ammonia c o n t a i n i n g s p e c i e s . Despite t h e great i n f l u e n c e o f t h e s e compounds on c a t a l y s t performance, t h e t o p i c h a s n o t been d e s c r i b e d c l e a r l y i n t h e open literature. According t o p r e v i o u s work (13,14), i t is clear t h a t t h i s " i d e a l hydrocracking" mechanism does n o t p r e v a i l anymore i n t h e p r e s e n c e of s u l f u r and

nitrogen

containing

feed.

The

s e l e c t i v i t y o f t h e r e a c t i o n is t o t a l l y modified, and c r a c k i n g r e a c t i o n s predominate under t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s . T h i s phenomenon can be i n t e r p r e t e d by a d r a m a t i c change i n t h e b a l a n c e between t h e two f u n c t i o n s (hydrogenation and c r a c k i n g ) . Another s t u d y (15) d e s c r i b e s t h e influence of hydrogen sulfide pressure on the reactivity of a P a l l a d i u m / z e o l i t e Y system. It also clearly shows t h e m o d i f i c a t i o n of s e l e c t i v i t y . A t around 40% c o n v e r s i o n , n-dodecane can be completly isomerized i n a s u l f u r - f r e e environment when, f o r t h e same conversion i n t h e p r e s e n c e of s u l f u r , t h e isododecane y i e l d i s v e r y low compared t o t h e hydrocracked product y i e l d . S o , t h e q u e s t i o n o f n i t r o g e n f e e d c o n t e n t can be summarized i n t h i s way : t h e nitrogen l e v e l w i l l c o n t r o l t h e o p e r a t i n g conditions o f the f i r s t hydrotreatment s t e p , so t h a t t h e n i t r o g e n s p e c i f i c a t i o n s o f t h e second s t e p

i n l e t f e e d can b e reached. Moreover t h e ammonia p a r t i a l p r e s s u r e o f t h e hydrocracking s e c t i o n w i l l b e a f u n c t i o n o f t h e n i t r o g e n l e v e l and w i l l a l s o depend on t h e t y p e of p r o c e s s used, whether s i n g l e - s t a g e o r two-stage. W e w i l l s t u d y h e r e t h e i n f l u e n c e of ammonia p a r t i a l p r e s s u r e on t h e a c t i v i t y and

s e l e c t i v i t y o f a z e o l i t e hydrocracking c a t a l y s t .

305 a

For

more

a n a l y s i s of t h e phenomenon from n s c i e n t i f i c p o i n t o f

accurate

view, w e performed t h i s s t u d y w i t h t h e n-heptane molecule. EXPERIMENTAL The

catalyst

used

was

the

industrial

catalyst,

HYC

642.

from

P r o c a t a l y s e . I t s hydrogenation f u n c t i o n c o n s i s t s o f Nickel and Molybdenum, and

i s provided by an U l t r a - S t a b l e Y z e o l i t e . Experiments a c a t a l y t i c u n i t w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g r e a c t o r dimensions: i n s i d e diameter 19 mm and l e n g t h 550 mm. A c a t a l y s t l o a d i n g o f 13 g , d i l u t e d with s i l i c o n c a r b i d e , was p l a c e d i n t h e middle o f t h e reactor. P r e h e a t i n g o f its

acidic

were

function

performed

in

f e e d was performed by a 150 mm long s i l i c o n c a r b i d e packing. Temperature

the

was c o n t r o l l e d by t h r e e thermocouples p l a c e d i n s i d e t h e r e a c t o r . In

order

to

keep t h e NiMo phase i n a s u l f i d e d s t a t e , a c o n s t a n t p a r t i a l

p r e s s u r e of hydrogen s u l f i d e was maintained i n t h e r e a c t o r by adding of

dimethyl

d i s u l f i d e t o t h e feed

. Ammonia p a r t i a l

1.5 w t %,

p r e s s u r e was c r e a t e d by

a known q u a n t i t y o f a n i l i n e t o t h e f e e d which was r e a d i l y transformed

adding

i n t o ammonia. A q u a n t i t y o f 1000 w t ppm of n i t r o g e n c o r r e s p o n d s t o an ammonia pressure

of

stabilization

6.1 kPa. Every change i n o p e r a t i n g c o n d i t i o n s was followed by a period

of

around

two

hours.

Under t h e c o n d i t i o n s u s e d , no

c a t a l y s t d e a c t i v a t i o n was v i s i b l e , even a f t e r s e v e r a l days. The which

different also

series o f

experiments

are b r i e f l y d e s c r i b e d i n T a b l e 1 ,

i n d i c a t e s t h e f i g u r e s o f t h e r e s u l t s r e p o r t e d . Others c o n d i t i o n s

were a t o t a l p r e s s u r e o f 6 MPa and a hydrogen-to-n-heptane molar r a t i o o f 6. TABLE 1 D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e main experimental parameters Run number

Temperature

NH3 p r e s s u r e

cont.time

("C)

(kPa)

(h)

260-340

0

0.5

360-425

6.1

0.5

390

0 t o 18

390

29 t o

370 380 390 390

o

6.1 then 0 6.1 then 0 6.1 then 0 6.1

0.5

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.21-0.71

Figure

306

EVOLUTION OF N-HEPTANE CONVERSION WITH TEMPERATURE

The

variation

can

It

on

conversion

with

temperature

was

followed

for

an

f e e d and f o r a f e e d c o n t a i n i n g 0 . 1 w t % n i t r o g e n ( r u n s 1 and 2 ) .

aniline-free be

seen

in

Figure

that

2

the

reaction

t e m p e r a t u r e ranges are

completely d i f f e r e n t . The poisonous e f f e c t o f ammonia must be compensated f o r by a t e m p e r a t u r e i n c r e a s e of around 100 'C.

-

LOO

5

90

Ef,

:

80

g

E 70 I3O

0 50

u

+ u

40

'

30

z

20 10

0

TEMPERATURE ( C )

Fig.

. Evolution

2

of

n-heptane c o n v e r s i o n w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e w i t h or without

ammonia.

The a p p a r e n t a c t i v a t i o n e n e r g i e s c a l c u l a t e d from Arrhenius e q u a t i o n s are 32 kcal/mole

for

the

nitrogen-containing

nitrogen-free feed.

following

hypothesis:

containing

feed,

increase

is

a

with

partial

liberates

some

This

when

two

feed

slight

temperature

phenomena

occur.

and

36

kcal/mole

for

the

d i f f e r e n c e c o u l d b e e x p l a i n e d by t h e

is The

increased

with

the

nitrogen

f i r s t one is a normal a c t i v i t y

temperature as i n t h e ammonia f r e e environment. The second one ammonia

desorption

from

the

zeolite's

acidic

sites. This

new a c t i v e s i t e s which are a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e r e a c t i o n and can

c o n t r i b u t e t o an i n c r e a s e i n t h e a p p a r e n t a c t i v a t i o n energy.

INFLUENCE OF AMMONIA PRESSURE

W e s t u d i e d t h e i n f l u e n c e o f ammonia p a r t i a l p r e s s u r e on z e o l i t e c a t a l y s t a c t i v i t y a t c o n s t a n t c o n d i t i o n s . Feed A n i l i n e c o n t e n t was v a r i e d i n o r d e r t o generate

different

increased

from

ammonia

pressures.

During

run 3,

ammonia

pressure

0 t o 18 kPa, w i t h a f r e s h c a t a l y s t b e i n g u s e d . During run 4,

p r e s s u r e d e c r e a s e d from 29 t o 0 kPa. The r e s u l t s are g i v e n i n F i g u r e 3.

307

-'

100

INCREASING PRESSURE = 0 DECREASING PRESSURE =O

k

2

2

80 70

::

ul

0

V

40

30 20 10

0

3

Fig.

. Variation

dramatic

A

especially n-heptane

in

5

10

15

20

25

30

AMMONIA PRESSURE (kPa)

of conversion with ammonia p r e s s u r e .

d r o p i n a c t i v i t y was observed when ammonia p r e s s u r e i n c r e a s e d , the

low

p r e s s u r e r e g i o n . Beyond a p r e s s u r e o f around 10 W a ,

conversion reached a pseudo-plateau. Another s t r i k i n g p o i n t i s t h a t

curves o b t a i n e d from an i n c r e a s e or a d e c r e a s e i n t h e a n i l i n e c o n t e n t are

the

nearly

i d e n t i c a l . Thus, t h e poisonous e f f e c t of ammonia i s r a t h e r r e v e r s i b l e .

There

must be an a d s o r p t i o n - d e s o r p t i o n e q u i l i b r i u m between ammonia i n t h e g a s

phase and t h e p r o t o n i c s i t e s o f t h e z e o l i t e . However, It

total

at

390 'C

never

been

n-heptane the

is

this

pressure.

can in

feed

true

over

the

whole

pressure

range e x c e p t a t z e r o

be i n f e r r e d from Figure 2 t h a t conversion of n-heptane i s i n a n i t r o g e n f r e e environment and f o r a c a t a l y s t t h a t has

contact

is

with

nitrogen

p r o d u c t s . Now, when a n i t r o g e n - f r e e

processed on a c a t a l y s t t h a t has a l r e a d y been working i n

presence of ammonia, n-heptane conversion i s o n l y 69 w t

%.The

poisonous

e f f e c t t h u s does n o t seem t o be completely r e v e r s i b l e under t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s .

W e w i l l d i s c u s s t h i s p o i n t i n more d e t a i l l a t e r on. The r e a c t i o n o r d e r with r e s p e c t t o ammonia p r e s s u r e was a l s o c a l c u l a t e d . For t h e set of experiments i n run 3. e x c l u d i n g z e r o ammonia p r e s s u r e , t h e o r d e r was -0.39 The r e s u l t s can be expressed i n a n o t h e r way. L e t u s c a l l "k " t h e f i r s t o r d e r rate c o n s t a n t t h a t would be o b t a i n e d a t a temperature of 390 'C w i t h a n i t r o g e n - f r e e f e e d . T h i s c o n s t a n t was e v a l u a t e d by e x t r a p o l a t i n g r e s u l t s p r e v i o u s l y r e p o r t e d and by u s i n g an a p p a r e n t a c t i v a t i o n energy o f 32 kcal/mole. The r a t e c o n s t a n t s , k. corresponding t o t h e c o n d i t i o n s with v a r i o u s ammonia p r e s s u r e s were a l s o c a l c u l a t e d . The k /k r a t i o r e p r e s e n t s a d e a c t i v a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t . Its e v o l u t i o n with ammonia p r e s s u r e i s shown i n Figure 4.

.

308 110

100 90

2

24 80 70 60

50

:: y 40 SO

0

Fig.

4

. Deactivation

0

,

,

5

, 10

,

,

.

, 20

15

. , . 25

3

AMMONIA PRESSURE &Pa)

factor as a function of ammonia pressure.

also calculated the temperature required t o achieve an n-heptane conversion of 22%. This isoconversion temperature is plotted as a function of ammonia pressure i n Figure 5 . W e

w

$

420 410 ‘0°

2W 390 380 a

970

i- 360 350 940

0

330

N-C7 CONMRSION

I N C R W C PRESSURE

320

= 22 W U =0

DkCRMSMC PRESSURE = [I

fi 910 900 290

.

0

5 Temperature needed function of ammonia pressure.

Fig.

10

5

20

15

25

31

AMMONIA PRESSURE (kPa)

to

obtain

22

w t % n-heptane conversion as a

309 The appears

poisonous that,

pronounced.

e f f e c t of ammonia can c l e a r l y be s e e n on t h e s e f i g u r e s . It

a

For

conditions

at

even

to

a

very

low

as

pressure

nitrogen

d e a c t i v a t i o n i s very

ammonia p r e s s u r e ,

as

low

content

1 kPa,

which corresponds i n o u r

164 w t ppm i n t h e f e e d , a c t i v i t y i s

of

by a f a c t o r o f 10 and temperature must be i n c r e a s e d by 60 'C t o g e t same conversion. T h i s f a c t o r becomes around 40 a t a p r e s s u r e o f 6.1 kPa, which corresponds t o a n i t r o g e n f e e d c o n t e n t o f 1000 w t ppm. Such a v a l u e is t y p i c a l of a number of hydrocracker f e e d s . A t h i g h e r ammonia p r e s s u r e s , F i g u r e 5 shows t h a t t h e v a r i a t i o n i n i s o c o n v e r s i o n t e m p e r a t u r e i s l e s s , probably because o f a s a t u r a t i o n e f f e c t o f t h e a c i d i c sites. divided the

REVERSIBILITY OF AMMONIA ADSORPTION

W e

have

previously

seen

that

worked

in

at

ammonia p r e s s u r e and f o r a c a t a l y s t having

zero

t h e presence o f ammonia, n-heptane c o n v e r s i o n i s much

than observed with a f r e s h c a t a l y s t under t h e same c o n d i t i o n s . Ammonia

lower

is

adsorption

t h u s p a r t l y i r r e v e r s i b l e . T h i s p o i n t w i l l be s t u d i e d now i n t o

more d e t a i l with t h e f o l l o w i n g experiments ( r u n s

5. 6, 7 ) .

The

c a t a l y s t was exposed, f o r f o u r h o u r s , t o an n-heptane f e e d c o n t a i n i n g

1wt %

a n i t r o g e n - f r e e f e e d was f e d i n ,

and

s u l f u r and 0.1 w t % n i t r o g e n conversion was followed as a

. Then

function

o f time-on-stream

f o r three

d i f f e r e n t s temperatures. R e s u l t s are g i v e n i n F i g u r e 6.

5

g

80

l-t

m 70 50

2

0

V

Fig.

6

60

0

, I

.

I

0

6

. Recovery

of

.

10

,

.

I

.

15

n-heptane

1

20

.

I

26

.

I

.

90

1

95

.

I

40

RUN TIME

conversion

.

I

46

(a)

.

I

.

60

I

.

56

60

as a f u n c t i o n o f time on stream

a f t e r a s t a b i l i z a t i o n p e r i o d a t an ammonia p r e s s u r e o f 6 . 1 kPa. The v a l u e s o b t a i n e d a t z e r o run time concern c a t a l y s t s i n e q u i l i b r i u m with

a

pressure

o f 6.1 kPa, and t h e r e s u l t s are similar t o t h o s e i n F i g u r e 2 .

310 appears

t h a t a c t i v i t y is p r o g r e s s i v e l y r e s t o r e d when t h e c a t a l y s t i s t o t h e n i t r o g e n - f r e e f e e d . T h i s r e a c t i v a t i o n i s much q u i c k e r a t high temperature. T h i s is a s t r o n g i n d i c a t i o n t h a t t h e phenomenon o c c u r r i n g i s a

It

exposed slow

desorption

that

this

of

from t h e a c i d i c sites. However, i t can be seen

ammonia

desorption

is

rather

slow.

For

i n s t a n c e , a t a t e m p e r a t u r e of

60 h o u r s , whereas a f r e s h same c o n d i t i o n s . W e can conclude t h a t ammonia a d s o r p t i o n i s q u i c k l y r e v e r s i b l e for a wide range of ammonia p r e s s u r e . However, a t z e r o p r e s s u r e , d e s o r p t i o n is r a t h e r slow, 370 'C.

conversion

catalyst

would

is

yield

60% a f t e r

only

100% conversion

around

under

the

probably because ammonia remains f i r m l y bound on t h e sites having t h e h i g h e s t acidity

.

SELECTIVITY BETWEEN ISOMERIZED AND CRACKED PRODUCTS

W e w i l l now focus on t h e p r o d u c t s from t h e r e a c t i o n , and e s p e c i a l l y on t h e s e l e c t i v i t y between i s o m e r i z a t i o n and c r a c k i n g . W e

will

first

consider

the

experiments

performed

i n t h e presence of

ammonia.

The t o t a l i s o - h e p t a n e y i e l d is p l o t t e d as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e cracked

products

yield

figure

as two s e p a r a t e c u r v e s f o r b e t t e r c l a r i t y : Run 2, 3 and

7 and run 3 , 4 and 8 i n F i g u r e 8.

4

in

5 0

HYDROCRACKING (WtX) Fig. It

7

. Isomerization

v e r s u s c r a c k i n g f o r Runs 2.

3. 4.

a p p e a r s t h a t , whatever t h e c o n d i t i o n s may b e , s e l e c t i v i t y i s t h e same

.

The same p r o d u c t d i s t r i b u t i o n between isomers and c r a c k e d p r o d u c t s i s o b t a i n e d when

conversion

varies,

p r e s s u r e o r c o n t a c t time.

the

varying

parameter

b e i n g t e m p e r a t u r e , ammonia

31 1

5

40

= CONSTANT

5 35

-------

+

= INCREASING = DECREASING ---do

5

0

8

Fig.

is

This

catalyst where

no

40

50 60 70 eo HYDROCRACKING (Wtz)

v e r s u s c r a c k i n g f o r Runs

longer

the

case

90

100

3 , 4, 8.

f o r experiments performed a t z e r o ammonia

t h e p r e s e n c e of ammonia ( c u r v e A ) ; Runs 5, 6 and 7 performed on a by ammonia but w i t h a n i t r o g e n - f r e e f e e d ( c u r v e B ) ; Run 1

poisoned

no

30

Figure 9 g i v e s t h e s e l e c t i v i t y o b t a i n e d for d i f f e r e n t experiments:

in

2

20

10

. Isomerization

pressure. Run

o

ammonia

is

p r e s e n t and on a f r e s h c a t a l y s t ( c u r v e C ) .

= -8-

n-C7:S

n-ms

(AMMONU DKSORPTION)

0

0

Fig.

9

.

10

20

SO

40

50

80

70

80

HYDROCRACKING (Wtz)

90

I s o m e r i z a t i o n v e r s u s c r a c k i n g f o r Runs 1. 2 , 5, 6 , 7.

100

312 appears

It

that

isomerization experiments

and

ammonia cracking.

performed

s t r o n g l y modifies p r o d u c t d i s t r i b u t i o n between The

cracking

r e a c t i o n i s more pronounced f o r

w i t h o u t n i t r o g e n . The a c t u a l parameter g o v e r n i n g t h i s

s e l e c t i v i t y i s i n f a c t t h e s u r f a c e s t a t e o f t h e c a t a l y s t . The v a l u e s r e l a t i n g t h e d e s o r p t i o n experiments ( c u r v e B) are s i t u a t e d between c u r v e s A and C,

to

despite

the

zero

ammonia p r e s s u r e and some d o t s c a t t e r i n g can b e observed.

T h i s i s due t o t h e f a c t t h a t measurements were made w i t h c a t a l y s t s undergoing ammonia

desorption,

and

hence c o n t a i n i n g d i f f e r e n t p r o p o r t i o n s o f poisoned

sites. ISOMER SELECTIVITY Figure pressure

10

compares

isoheptanes

s e l e c t i v i t y f o r Runs 1 and 2 , f o r which

r e s p e c t i v e l y 0 and 6 . 1 kPa.

was

1.00

c E

!i w

rn

0.00 I

F i g . 10 The

. I s o h e p t a n e s s e l e c t i v i t y as a f u n c t i o n

first

di-branched when yield

of conversion.

o b s e r v a t i o n i s t h a t , f o r each r u n , t h e p r o p o r t i o n s o f mono- and isomers are f a i r l y s t a b l e as a f u n c t i o n o f conversion. Secondly,

t h e r e a c t i o n i s performed i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f ammonia, t h e methylhexanes increases

selectivity

remains

to

the

detriment

of

dimethyl

pentanes.

Ethylpentane

roughly unmodified. F i g u r e 11 shows t h a t t h e p r o p o r t i o n

o f i s o b u t a n e i n t h e cracked p r o d u c t s d e c r e a s e s i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f ammonia.

313

P(NH3) =

0

p(m3)=

6.1 I(PA

---- --

-

YP.4 :IcI/ICI+NCI

=a

._ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _

id/ICI+NCI = 0

- - - - -

- - _ _ - - - - - - - - - _-

Thermodynamic equilibrium

I

10

F i g . 11

. Isobutane

'

20

I

~

30

l

40

'

l

50

'

l

60

'

CONVERSION (WTZ)

l

70

~

I

s e l e c t i v i t y a s a f u n c t i o n o f conversion.

DISCUSSION CONCERNING PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION The e f f e c t s of ammonia p r e s s u r e on p r o d u c t d i s t r i b u t i o n can b e summarized as follows: (1) Isomers y i e l d is i n c r e a s e d t o t h e d e t r i m e n t of cracked p r o d u c t y i e l d f o r a g i v e n conversion. ( 2 ) Mono-branched isomers are favored with

respect

t o di-branched ones. ( 3 ) Cracked p r o d u c t s are less isomerized.

An e x p l a i n a t i o n must be found t o account f o r a l l t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t s . The

first

temperature

observation increase

of

is t h a t t h e p r e s e n c e o f ammonia r e s u l t s i n 90 t o 100 'C t o o b t a i n t h e same conversion. Hence are d i f f e r e n t between t h e two sets of c o n d i t i o n s .

thermodynamic c o n d i t i o n s The is0 t o normal r a t i o p r e d i c t e d by t h e thermodynamic e q u i l i b r i u m d e c r e a s e s when temperature i n c r e a s e s . However, as shown i n F i g u r e 11, t h e v a r i a t i o n s of t h e e q u i l i b r i u m are t o o small t o e x p l a i n o u r r e s u l t s .

ammonia p r e s s u r e r e s u l t s in a p o i s o n i n g o f a c i d i c s i t e s . Many sites are a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e r e a c t i o n and t h i s e f f e c t is compensated f o r

Obviously,

less

by t h e t e m p e r a t u r e i n c r e a s e . T h i s means t h a t t h e a v e r a g e t u r n o v e r number is g r e a t e r , and t h a t t h e r e s i d e n c e time of carbenium i o n s on a c i d i c sites i s s h o r t e r . On t h e o t h e r hand. i t has been c l e a r l y e s t a b l i s h e d from t h e l i t e r a t u r e t h a t t h e i s o m e r i z a t i o n mechanism proceeds through a carbenium i o n rearrangement. For n-heptane, t h e scheme is (1) a d s o r p t i o n o f n-heptene coming

from

NiMo sites t o produce a normal carbenium i o n . ( 2 ) i s o m e r i z a t i o n

314 to

a

are

isomer and e v e n t u a l l y t o a dibranched isomer. These i o n s

monobranched in

equilibrium

corresponding

between

heptenes.

adsorption/desorption

themselves,

The

and

a l s o i n equilibrium with t h e

h i g h e r t h e t e m p e r a t u r e , t h e more d i s p l a c e d t h e

i s toward o l e f i n s . W e c a n assume t h a t t h e

equilibrium

s t a t e o f t h e average carbenium i o n s l y i n g on t h e s u r f a c e is d i f f e r e n t w i t h or without

ammonia.

t h e l a t e r case, w i t h a l o n g r e s i d e n c e t i m e , t h e a c i d i c

In

s i t e s would b e mostly covered by dibranched i o n s . A t h i g h e r t e m p e r a t u r e s , i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f ammonia, t h e i o n s would be less isomerized. I n t h i s c a s e , t h e cracking would

would be reduced, because c r a c k i n g o f t h e monobranched C7

tendency

carbenium

is

ion

also

isobutane

much

explain

molecule

slower

the

t h a n f o r t h e dibranched i o n . Moreover, t h i s

d e c r e a s e i n i s o b u t a n e i n t h e c r a c k e d p r o d u c t s . The

o r i g i n a t e s e s s e n t i a l l y from di-branched i o n s by a t y p e B

b e t a - s c i s s i o n mechanism , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n proposed r e c e n t l y ( 1 6 ) . So, t h e poisonous e f f e c t o f ammonia would r e s u l t i n a lower isomerization

degree

o f t h e carbenium i o n , which i n t u r n would i n d u c e fewer

monobranched heptane i s o m e r s , fewer c r a c k i n g r e a c t i o n s and fewer i s o b u t a n e i n cracked p r o d u c t s . CONCLUSION The

nitrogen

Operating feed

so

content,

feed

level

conditions

can

be

hydrocracking

of

hydrocracker f e e d s l e a d s t o s e v e r a l consequences.

of t h e f i r s t - s t e p h y d r o t r e a t m e n t depend on t h e n i t r o g e n

that

t h e n i t r o g e n s p e c i f i c a t i o n s o f t h e second-step i n l e t

reached. section

Moreover,the

ammonia

partial

pressure

of

the

w i l l depend on t h e n i t r o g e n l e v e l and a l s o on t h e type

o f p r o c e s s used, whether s i n g l e - s t a g e o r two-stage. Ammonia

pressure

hydrocracking

dramatic quantity

A

e f f e c t on t h e a c t i v i t y o f t h e z e o l i t e of

1000 w t ppm

nitrogen

added t o an

f e e d , g e n e r a t i n g a p a r t i a l p r e s s u r e o f 6.1 kPa. i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r

n-heptane an

a

has

catalyst.

loss

activity

temperature

a

of

increase

reversible

for

desorption

is

factor

of

a wide slow,

of

40,

which can be compensated f o r by a

100 " C . Ammonia a d s o r p t i o n i s q u i c k l y p r e s s u r e . However, a t z e r o p r e s s u r e , t h a t ammonia remains s t r o n g l y adsorbed on t h e to

90

range

of

meaning

most a c i d i c sites o f z e o l i t e . The

presence

selectivity.The products.

isomer

ammonia

of

These

isomers

effects

isomerization

in

modifications

in

product

i n c r e a s e d t o t h e d e t r i m e n t o f cracked are f a v o r e d and cracked p r o d u c t s are less

be r a t i o n a l i z e d by assuming a lower average

can

of

results

is

yield

Monobranched

isomerized. degree

of

carbenium

ions,

due

to

a sharp decrease i n

r e s i d e n c e time a t t h e p r o t o n i c sites. From

a

refractory that

process

point

feedstocks

operating

of

view,

containing

conditions

must

t h e r e i s a problem o f how t o cope w i t h

large

amounts o f n i t r o g e n . I t i s obvious

be a d j u s t e d t o compensate f o r t h e a c t i v i t y

315

loss either by temperature increase or by space velocity decrease. However, the start-of-run temperature must remain inside reasonable limits (e.g. 400 'C), to prevent a quick deactivation of the catalytic system because of thermodynamic limitations for polyaromatics hydrogenation. Of course these limits depend on hydrogen pressure. For very difficult cases, a solution may also be to choose a two-stage process configuration, which makes for a substantial reduction of ammonia pressure in the hydrocracking section. Likewise, the replacement of amorphous type catalyst by more active zeolite catalysts results in a decrease in operating temperature, which is especially appreciated in this case of refractory feeds.

REFERENCES N.Choudary and D.N.Saraf, Ind.Eng.Chem.,Prod.Res.Dev., 1 4 ( 2 ) , 74, 1975. 1 2 A.Billon, J.P.Franck and J.P.Peries, Hydroc. Proc., 139, Sept 1975 C.E.Maier. P.H.Biaeard. A.Billon and P.Dufresne. NPRA Annual Meeting. 3 -. San Antonio, March 19g8. . P.Dufresne. P.I!.Bineard and A. Billon, Catalysis Today, 1. 367. 1987 4 C .Marcilly and JTP. Franck, Catalysis by-Zeolites; .B.Imelik et a1 Eds , 5 Elsevier. Amsterdam, 93. 1980. 6 G.E.Lang1oi.s and R.F.Sulivan, Adv.Chem.Ser. 97, 38, 1969 M.Guisnet and 3.Perot. Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Zeolites, 7 Portugal, 39, May 1983. J.Weitkamp. P.A.Jacob and J.A.Martens, Appl. Catal., 20, 239 and 283, 8 1986 H.L.Coonradt and W.E.Garwood,Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc Des. Dev., 3, 38, 1964 9 10 J.Weitkamp, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 21, 550, 1982 11 G.Giannetto, G.Perot and M.Guisnet, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod Res. Dev., 25, 481, 1986. 12 M.Steijns and G.F.Froment, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc Des. Dev., 20, 660, 1981. and A.Billon, Franco-Venezuela Conference, 13 P.Dufresne, C.Marcilly Rueil-Malmaison, France, 1985. 14 F.Y. El-Kady, Egypt. J. Chem., 21, 5, 349, 1978. 15 H.Dauns, S.Ernst and J.Weitkamp, Proc. 7th Int. Zeol. Conf.. Murakami et a1 Eds., 787, Kodansha, Tokyo and Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986. 16 J.Weitkamp, P.A.Jacob and J.A.Martens. Appl. Catal., 8, 123, 1983