Insect actomyosin A flow birefringence study

Insect actomyosin A flow birefringence study

J. Ins. Physiol., 1959, Vol. 3, pp. 271 to 292. Pergamon Press Ltd., London. P&ted in Great Britain INSECT ACTOMYOSIN A FLOW BIREFRINGENCE STUDY* K...

1MB Sizes 1 Downloads 69 Views

J. Ins. Physiol., 1959, Vol. 3, pp. 271 to 292. Pergamon Press Ltd., London. P&ted

in Great Britain

INSECT ACTOMYOSIN A FLOW BIREFRINGENCE STUDY* K. MARUYAMA Biological

Institute,

College of General Education, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan (Received

11 December

University

of Tokyo,

1958)

Abstract-Flow birefringence properties of myosin B (natural actomyosin), myosin, F-act& and synthetic actomyosin from honeybee thoracic muscle were investigated in detail with special reference to the interaction with adenosine triphosphate (ATP).

The flow birefringence of insect actomyosin was very strong from the comparative biophysical viewpoint. The outstanding aspect of insect actomyosin is that the flow birefringence properties are not so sensitiveto the action of ATP as seen in actomyosins from other animals. It is concluded that the interaction between myosin and actin exists to some extent in the presence of ATP. Based on the above-mentioned results, the characteristics of insect actomyosin are discussed in connexion with its physiological function. INTRODUCTION

RECENT physicochemical

studies on muscle suggest that the ATP-actomyosin system plays a fundamental role in muscular function from a comparative viewpoint (cf. SZENT-GY~RGYI, 1951; WEBER and PORTZEHL, 1952; MARUYAMA and TONOMURA, 1957). Although insect flight muscle has a highly specialized function and structure (cf. HODGE, 1955; PHILPOTT and SZENT-GY~RGYI, 1955), no marked difference has been observed between the physicochemical properties of insect actomyosin and actomyosins of animals belonging to different phyla (GILMOUR and CALABY, 1953; MARUYAMA, 1954a, b, 1957b, 1958b). However, in a preliminary experiment it was found that the amount of flow birefringence of insect actomyosin was much larger than that of vertebrates and was relatively little affected by ATP (MARUYAMA, 1957b). Since the classical work of MUFULT and EDSALL (1930a, b), it has been well known that the actomyosin solution is strongly birefringent and ATP affects profoundly its birefringence properties (DAINTY et al., 1944; BINKLEY, 1948). Recently we analysed the molecular mechanism of the interaction of rabbit myosin B with ATP, using flow birefringence (DRF) technique (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a, b).

Here a detailed work on the DRF properties of myosin B (natural actomyosin), myosin, F-actin, and synthetic actomyosin from honeybee thoracic muscle will be presented with special reference to the ATP effect on these proteins. * Biochemical Approach to Muscular Function in Insects. III. II in this series, cf. MARUYAMA (195713). 271

K. MARUYAMA

272

MATERIAL

AND METHODS

Material In most cases, actively flying adult workers of the honeybee, A&s mellifeera, were used as material. In a few cases, developing pupae and just-emerged adults were taken from the beehive. Details in handling the material were described in previous papers (MARUYAMA, 1957a, b ; 1958b). For comparison, tail muscle of the crayfish (cf. MARUYAMA, 1958a) and the striated portion of adductors of the clam (cf. MARUYAMA,1957~) were used. Preparation

of proteins

Natural actomyosin or myosin B was prepared as described before (MARUYAMA, 195713). The protein solution, finally dissolved in 0.6 M KC1 at pH 7 and clarified for 30 min at 12,000 G, will be referred to as ‘original sample’ in the text. Usually the original sample was suitably diluted and clarified for 1 hr at 24,000 G. Unless otherwise stated, this ‘clarified sample’ was used for measurements. Myosin A was extracted according to the procedures of SZENT-GY~RGYI (1945 ; 1951) (KCl-myosin), of HAS~ELBACHand SCHNEIDER(1951) (PP-myosin) and of SZENT-GY~~RGYI (195 1) (KI myosin). The purification procedure was the same as for myosin B except that precipitation was effected by lowering the ionic strength to 0.05. Pure myosin was prepared from myosin B by the method of A. WEBER(1956) (Weber’s myosin). Myosin B was centrifuged for 3 hr at lo5 G in a preparative ultracentrifuge in the presence of 0.6 M KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl,, 0.02 M trishydroxymethyl-aminomethane (Tris) buffer, pH 7, and 5 mM ATP. After centrifuging, the upper four-fifths of the clear supernatant was carefully pipetted away and used as the myosin solution. The remainder was decanted into a test-tube and also tested for the DRF assay. Actin was prepared according to the method of BARANYet al. (1957) without previous extraction of myosin. Muscle suspension was washed with 0.04 per cent NaHCO, and 0.01 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Well-washed muscle residue was treated with acetone four times. The acetone powder was extracted with pure water and the extract was clarified by centrifuging for 1 hr at 24,000 G. The clear yellowish supernatant was used as G-actin solution. G-actin was transformed into F-actin by adding KC1 and MgCl, to final concentrations of O-1 M and 0.1 mM, respectively. To make synthetic actomyosin, ATP-free myosin was combined with F-actin in the standard medium. Flow birefringence

tests

Measurements for flow birefringence were carried out in a flow birefringence apparatus (Rao Instrument Co. Model A-2) at 20-21°C using a teflon cell. The procedure was exactly the same as that described by NODA and MARWAMA (1958a). The test solution consisted of O-6 M KCl, 0.02 M Tris buffer (pH 7*0), 1.5 mM MgCl,, and a given protein of appropriate concentration.

INSECT

ACTOMYOSIN.

A FLOW

BIREFRINGENCE

273

STUDY

Two variables were measured as a function of the velocity gradient (G) over a wide range, the extinction angle (x) and the amount of f-low birefringence (An). The relative value of flow birefringence will be frequently given as an angle A0 in this paper (MURALT and EDSALL, 1930b; cf. CERF and SCHERAGA,1952). The absolute amount of the flow birefringence (An) is easily calculated by multiplying the A value by a factor of 3.51 x lo-* in the present study. Other tests Viscosity of any protein solution prepared in this work was always tested by usual Ostwald viscometers of high velocity gradients (mean value, more than 1000 set-‘) at 15°C. Viscosity of a highly diluted myosin B solution in the standard medium was determined in ‘a capillary viscometer of mean velocity gradient of 100 see-l at 20°C. ATPase tests were carried out as previously reported (MARUYAMA, 1957b). Protein concentration The protein concentration was determined micro-Kjeldahl procedure, using the factor of 6.

by nitrogen

analysis

through

Reagents ATP was purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. as a crystalline sample. ATP was dissolved in water, neutralized to pH 7 with KOH and stored at -5°C. Just before use, the ATP solution was made.up into O-6 M KC1 solution. Usually 1.0 ml of the ATP solution (10 mM) was added to 9-O ml of the experimental solution at 20°C and 1.0 ml of O-6 M KC1 alone was put into the control solution. Tris was the product of the British Drug Houses Co. ; Pyrophosphate (PP) was twice recrystallized. RESULTS MYOSIN

B

Molecular size The so-called myosin B or natural actomyosin extracted for 3 hr with WeberEdsall solution and purified three times by the usual dilution-precipitation procedure showed a strong flow birefringence at a very low velocity gradient. It was observed that the relationship between x and G at very low velocity gradients depends upon the protein concentration for concentrations as low as 0.05 per cent. Usually the protein concentration around 0.03 per cent was used for measurements. It is to be noted that no dilution effect, i.e. dissociation upon dilution, occurred even if placed overnight at 0°C in such a low protein concentration (cf. JOLY et al., 1955 ; HIPPEL et al., 1958). In Fig. 1 is presented a typical result of x-G curve of insect myosin B at low G. We can obtain from this curve the rotary diffusion constant (0) at

K.

274

G = 0 by the following

formula

MARUYAMA

of

PETERLIN

AND

(cf.

STUART

and

CERF

SCHERAGA, 1952).

where x is expressed in degrees (“). The rotary diffusion constant at G = 0 was about 0.4 set-l and upon addition of ATP it was slightly elevated to about O-5 set-l (Table 1). Th e unclarified original sample showed somewhat smaller

25”

1 0

I

I

I

2

I

I

3

4

5 G,

I

6

I

7

I

8

9

I 10

1

II

set-’

FIG. 1. Extinction angle (x) of insect myosio B at low velocity gradients (G). 0.029 per cent; 0-O : control; a---@ : with ATP (1mM).

TABLE

~-ROTARY

DIFFUSION CONSTANT (0) AND EXTINCTION ANGLE (X) OF INSECT MYOSIN I3

Conditions: 0.6 M KCI, 0.02 M Tris buffer, and 1.5 mM MgCIs. pH 7.0; 20°C -ATP Preparation No.

8 G =0* (se&)

Average

1 mM ATP, when added.

+ATP X

0

X

100

1200

1200

(“)

G =0 (set-r)

100

(“)

(“>

(“)

:

0.4 0.5

11.3 9.8

6.2 $6

0.5

10.8 13.4

7.2

:

0.4 0.3

10.0 10.3

5.2

;::

12.3 11.X

;:;

5

0.6

10%

6.0

;:;

12.2

;:;

0.44

10.4

5.6

0.54

12.1

7.6

* G is given as sec.-l.

INSECT

A

ACTOMYOSIN.

FLOW

BIREFRINGENCE

STUDY

275

0 values: 0.25 and 0.30 set-l with and without ATP.* However, in this case the x-G curve was not reversible upon shear stress: after being subjected to G up to 2000 set-l, x at low G was irreversibly increased, although the change was smaller in the presence of ATP. At high G, x was greater than the value of the clarified sample (cf. Fig. 11). Possibly in the original sample a larger size of molecules may be broken by shear stress. At high G, x was also slightly, but definitely raised with ATP (5”-7” at G = 1200 see-l), as shown in Fig. 2. This increase in x with ATP is not so pronounced as in rabbit myosin B (NODA and MARUYAMA,1958a, b).

1

c\

FIG. 2. Extinction angle (x) of insect myosin I3 at a wide range of Velocity gradients (G). 0.031 per cent; O-_O : control; O-0 : with ATP.

The rotary diffusion constant (8) is very sensitive to the length of molecules of a high degree of asymmetry. If we know 9 and the axial ratio of any rigid prolate ellipsoid, we can easily calculate the molecular length by the following formula of PERRIN (cf. CERF and SCHERAGA, 1952). a3=

3kT 16~r1,8

In this formula a and b are the semi-axes T is the absolute temperature, and k difficult task to determine the axial ratio of asymmetry such as actomyosin. As

-1+21nb

2a >

of the molecule, q0 is the solvent viscosity, is the Boltzmann constant. It is a very of a macromolecule of a very high degree tentatively adopted by many workers in

* The anomalous behaviour of x-G relationship observed in the unclarified sample of rabbit myosin B (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a) was not observed in the insect, although an aggregate formation was observed to take place with ATP, if temperature was raised from 0°C to 20°C after the addition of ATP.

276

K.

MARWAMA

this field (MEHL, 1940 ; TONOMURA and MATSUMIYA, 1958 ; NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a), an axial ratio of 100 is used here. At given G, 8 can be calculated from the table of EDSALL et al. (195 1). The rotary diffusion constants of insect actomyosin at various G are given in Table 2. They distributed from 0.6 to 12 set-l and O-7 to 17 set-l with and without ATP,

which correspond

to molecular

lengths of 3.3-l-2

p, and 3.0-0.9 p

TABLE Z-ROTARY DIFFUSIONCONSTAN+OF INSECT MYOSIN B AT VARIEDVELOCITY GRADIENTS Velocity gradient (se&)

Rotary

diffusion

constant

PP 0.70 0.78 1.14 2.50 3.70 6.38 11.2 16.2 23.5

0

50 100 200 500 800 1200 Conditions as in Table 1. The concentration

with and without 1-O p)

(NODA

ATP.

and

(set-l)

This

of ATP or PP was 1 mM, when added.

distribution

MAFWYAMA,

1958a;

is similar to rabbit actomyosin TONOMURA

and MATSUMIYA,

(3-O1958).

Flow birefringence Intensity

of flow birefringence

was also a little affected by ATP:

decreased by some 20-30 per cent up to 10 see-l

it was only

and at more than 100 see-l

TABLE ~--FLOW BIRBFRINGENCE OF INSECTMYOSINB Flow birefringence Preparation No.

+ATP ______

-ATP

____________ G =5 ~~------

(An)*

10

100

1200

G =5

10

100

1200

157 134

272 220

369 311

;;

117 103

257 182

363 297

1 2

101

: 5

104 7; 87 ___.

115 139 133

217 242 213

335 342 320

E 65

106 96 104

209 195 202

339 341 337

Average

93

135

234

335

73

106

210

340

* An is given as 10m8 per 0.1 per cent protein solution under the conditions as in Table 1.

no

INSECT ACTOMYOSIN.

277

A FLbW BIREFRINGENCESTUDY

significant decrease was found (Fig. 3). In fact it was frequently observed that An somewhat increased with ATP at G = 1200 set-r (see Table 3 and Fig. 3). On the other hand, PP was more effective than ATP in lowering. An of insect myosin B (Fig. 3).

A 20'

G,

SC-'

FIG. 3. Flow birefringence (An) of insect myosin B at a wide range of velocity gradients (G). 0.031 per cent; 0 : control; 0 : 1 mM ATP; a : 1 mM PP.

The effect of 0.5 M KI in addition to O-1 M KC1 was ,very remarkable on the DRF properties of insect myosin B. Whereas An of an original sample was 292 x 10es at G = 1200 set-l, it was lowered to 50 with KI (280 with ATP). The extinction angle was elevated from 6.7” to 25” (8.3” with ATP). The rotary diffusion constant in the presence of Kl ranged from 100 to 1000 set-l at velocity gradients from 500 to 4000 set-l. Here again the KI effect was not so tremendous as in the rabbit (cf. NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a). MYOSIN

A PROCEDURES

KCL-myoszn Short extraction o-t muscle with Weber-Edsall or Guba-Straub solution always yielded proteins of myosin B type in accordance with the results of GILMOUR

and

CALABY

(1953)

on locust

muscle.

PP-myoszk HASSELBACH-SCHNEIDER’S the. viscosity viscosity

itself

of

which

was

was

procedure greatly

considerably

(1951), reduced

lower

than

using with that

PP, ATP,

of

also yielded although

3 hr-myosin

myosin the

B

B,

specific

(Table

4).

K. MARUYAMA

278

PP-myosin A showed similar flow birefringence properties to myosin B. An per unit protein concentration is comparable; 19 at G = 0 is near 0.3 set-l. ATP somewhat increased 0. On the other hand, An was not appreciably lowered with ATP; one sample of three showed an appreciable increase in & at all G tested in the presence of ATP. The‘latter fact was never encountered in myosin B. TABLE ~-VISCOSITY

DATA OF MYOSIN A AND B FROM HONEYBEE THORACIC MUSCLE

Conditions:

Preparation

KI-myosin

A

PP-myosin

A,

0.6 M KCI;

2

pH 7.0; 15°C

ATP

ZATP

sensitivity per cent 2

0.138

0.136

1 2

0.243 0.232

0.121 0.093

100 150

: 3 4 5 Average

0.420 0.370 0.380 0.410 0.390 0.394

0.180 0.170 0.180 0.175 0.175 0.176

130 120 110 130 120 124

Myosin B,

KI-myosin It was found that the only way to extract a solution of myosin directly from honeybee thoracic muscle was to use 0.6 M KI as the extracting medium (A. G. 45 40 x

35 30 A

0

I

I

1000

2000

G,

I

3000

I

4000

set-’

FIG. 4. FIow birefringence properties of insect KI-my&n. @---0 : with ATP.

O-1 per cent; O-0

: control;

STUDY INSECTACTOMYOSIN.A FLOW BIREFRINGENCE

279

SZENT-GY~RGYI, 1951). The KI-myosin showed no detectable viscosity change on addition of ATP. Table 4 summarizes the viscosity data of several kinds of myosin A and myosin B preparations from honeybee muscle. Here the ATP sensitivity of WEBER and PORTZEHL (1952) was adopted: ATP

sensitivity

x 100

=

Z, viscosity number = In 7 rel/C; C is the protein concentration given as g/l.; ZATP, viscosity number in the presence of ATP. The flow birefringence properties of KI-myosin are quite different from those of PP-myosin or myosin B. As is seen in Fig. 4, An per unit protein concentration was very low at low’ G and increased proportionally to G up to 3000 set-l. ATP gave negligible effect on the An-G relationship. Furthermore, x-G relationship was anomalous; at lower G, x showed a low value and increased significantly in increasing G up to 2500 sec- I. This fact is understood by assuming that a minute amount of larger particles, possibly actomyosin, contaminated the preparation. This was supported by the fact that ATP appreciably raised x values at G lower than 2000 see-l (Fig. 4). Weber’s nayosin Pure myosin was separated from myosin B according to the method of A. WEBER (1956). A 0.3 per cent solution of myosin B was centrifuged for 3 hr at

G,

set-’

FIG. 5. Flow birefringence properties of insect myosin separated from myosin B. 0.1 per cent; extinction angle (x) : 0, x ; flow birefringence (A) : 0, A. Different symbols show different preparations.

K. MARUYAMA

280

100,000 G in the presence of ATP. The water-clear solution of the upper supernate contained about O-1 per cent of protein. The x-G relationship was relatively homogeneous, giving a f3value of 2300 see-l at G = 0 (Fig. 5). The An-G curve was similar to that of KI-myosin, giving a An value of 25 x lo-* at G = 1200 set-l per 0.1 per cent solution, which is in accord with the value obtained with rabbit myosin within the experimental error (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a). The length of insect myosin is rather uniform: 2000 A-1700 A was obtained (Table 5). TABLES-ROTARY DIFFUSION CONSTANT (0) AND APPARENT LENGTH (2a) OFINSECT WEBER’S MYOSIN ATVARIOUS VELOCITY GRADIENTS (G) G (se&)

8 (se&)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

2300 2500 3100 3300 3600

& 2000 1960 1810 1780 1920

The length of rabbit myosin was 2200 a at G = 0 (NODA and MARUYAMA,1958a; JOLY et al., 1955). This fraction was dialysed to 0.6 M KCl, pH 7, for 48 hr, changing frequently the surrounding medium. After the added Mg and ATP were almost completely removed, the protein was tested for ATPase activity. The results for the ATPase assay are summarized in Table 6, which shows typical ATPase properties of TABLE~-ATPA~E ACTIVITY OFINSECT WEBER’S MYOSIN Conditions: 3 PM ATP, 0.6 M KCI, 0.02 M Tris buffer and O-4 mg protein. Total volume, 1.5 ml. Incubated for 5 min at pH 7.0 and 20°C Addition Control 1.5 mM MgCl, 1.5 mM MgCI,+l.S 1.5 mM CaCI, 3 mM EDTA

pg P liberated 2.0

mM CaCl,

::; 15.5 50.0

myosin. It should be noted that insect myosin splits only the terminal P group frdm ATP. The activity level itself was considerably higher than that of the corresponding myosin B under the similar conditions (cf. MARUYAMA, 1957b). The formation of actin complex gives final evidence that the fraction separated from myosin B is actually myosin (see over).

INSECT

ACTOMYOSIN.

A

FLOW

BIREFRINGENCE

281

STUDY

ACTIN”

F-act&

in myosin B

The presence of actin in rabbit myosin B was suggested by WEBER (1956) and later directly shown by BAFUNY et al. (1957) and GERGELY and MARTONOSI(1958). In the present study, a trial to extract actin from the precipitate formed upon the high speed centrifugation in the separation of myosin from myosin B was unsuccessful. However, there was obtained some evidence to suggest that actin was present in myosin B. The lower one-fifth of the supernate was tested for DRF measurements: a highly anomalous x-% relationship was observed as seen in Fig. 6. This shows the presence of longer particles in addition to myosin. When

- 50’ - 40”

A 300

-

200

- 100 '0

1000

2000 G

3000

4000

IO

SW-'

FIG. 6. Flow birefringence properties of a mixture of F-actin and myosin separated from insect myosin B. 0.23 per cent. Extinction angle (x) : 0 (control); x (with 0.6 M KI); flow birefringence (A) : 0 (control); 0 (with 0.6 M KI).

solid KI was added, the anomalous behaviour in the x-G curve disappeared and furthermore the An-G curve turned into a myosin type. In the actin, prepared by conventional procedures, KI depolymerized F-actin to G-actin so that F-actin might be responsible for the anomalous behaviour. G- and F-act&

~

Addition of O-1 M KC1 and 1O-4 M Mg ++ transformed insect G-actin into Factin, the process of which was followed by viscometry. A sample,, which originally showed the relative viscosity of 1.02 became viscous, the viscosity increasing to 1.62 upon G-F transformation within 30 min at 20°C after the addition of The G-actin solution was completely non-birefringent and KC1 and MgCl,. F-actin solution showed a strong birefringence. It is a curious fact that the

K. MARUYAMA

282

viscosity of F-actin was frequently low, but exhibited a strong flow birefringence. The flow birefringence properties of F-actin greatly depend upon the protein concentration. It is a very difficult problem to make a proper characterization of F-actin by DRF analysis. Even in very dilute protein solutions such as 0*02 and 0.03 per cent, the concentration-change was observed in x-G relationships, especially at low G: 0 at G = 0 was 0.03, 0.04 and 0.08 set-l for the solutions of 0.042, 0.033 and 0.024 per cent. The results for O-024 per cent solution are illustrated in Fig. 7. In that concentration, the x-G relationship was reversible

30” X 25” 20”

A

50

150

0

I

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

iO

II

0

G, set-’ FIG. 7. Flow birefringence

properties of insect F-actin. 0.024 per cent. Extinction angle (x) : 0 ; flow birefringence (A) : ‘0.

up to G = 20 set-1. Once subjected to a high G, namely 1000 set-I, the strong flow birefringence of the solution did not disappear for a considerable time after the shear stress was removed. This behaviour more markedly increased in denser protein concentration. On the other hand, in very dilute solutions x was irreversibly increased at high G. The amount of An of F-actin was low in very dilute protein concentrations and it was very high in the dense ones. Besides, the An value varied widely at the same protein concentration and velocity gradient from sample to sample. These phenomena may be due to the formation and destruction of a complicated network of F-actin molecules, as shown in rabbit actin by OOSAWA and his collaborators (ASAKURA et al., 1958). ATP did not give any effect on the DRF properties of F-actin.

INSECT

A

ACTOMYOSIN.

SYNTHETIC

FLOW

BIRBFRINGENCE

STUDY

283

ACTOMYOSIN

The F-actin solution and myosin fraction prepared from myosin B were mixed in several proportions and placed for at least 2 hr at about 20°C. The mixture formed actomyosin complex, showing response to ATP or PP. A typical result with the synthetic actomyosin is indicated in Figs. 8 and 9. The distinctive

50

0 0

100

500

1000

G,

set

-I

FIG. 8. Flow birefringence (A) of insect synthetic actomyosin and its components at high velocity gradients (G). 0 : 0.05 per cent actornyosin; 0 : 0.05 per cent+ATP; LI : 0.05 per cent+PP; x : 0.025 per cent F-actin; 0 : 0.025 per cent myosin.

x 200

100

I

IO

100

G,

1000

SW-

FIG. 9. Extinction angle (x) of insect synthetic actomyosin and its components at a wide range of velocity gradients (G). Symbols as in Fig. 8.

aspects of the synthetic actomyosin are as follows: (1) ATP was more effective than on the natural actomyosin, i.e. the decrease in An was observed in all G ranges tested and x was considerably elevated. (2) PP appeared to dissociate the

284

K.

MARUYA~~A

actomyosin into F-actin and myosin completely (see also Table 10). The latter fact with respect to An is clearly seen in Fig. 8. These results suggest that the actomyosin complex reconstituted in vitro was loose in the combination between myosin and F-actin. However, in the two kinds of preparations, where the myosinactin ratio was 2 : 1 or 5 : 1; x was considerably increased upon elevating G, especially at high G. This suggests that there existed free myosin or that myosin was set free from the complex by shear stress. In any case,:ATP or PP gave a profound effect by causing a dissociation. It is of importance to note that An of the synthetic actomyosin was considerably smaller than that of the natural actomyosin : 105 x 1OW (myosin-actin ratio,* 1 : l), 74 (1 : 2) and 50 (1 : 5) per 0.1 per cent solution at G = 1200 set-I. COMPARATIVE

STUDIES

Comparison in di#eTent animals It is highly significant that the flow birefringence of insect actomyosin is greatest in the actomyosins from various types of striated muscle so far investigated (Table 7). Although the rotary diffusion constants are of similar magniTABLE

7-A

Animal

Rabbit*

COMPARATIVE

Type of muscle

skeletal

STUDY OF FLOW BIREFRINGENCE PROPERTIES OF MYOSIN DIFFERENT TYPES OF STRIATED MUSCLE

ATP ______ + ___~

Honeybee

Crayfish

thoracic

tail

+ _______ + ~___

Clam

adductor

* Data taken from

+

0 G =0 set-l

An

x

(“)

(“)

G =lO (10-S)

G =1200 (10-8)

0.7 1.2

10 13

1:

47 11

164 68

;:;

1:

135 106

335 340

1.8 -

;9

11 38

38 -

115 30

28 38

24 36

-

-

G =200

B FROM

G =1200

;:z

47 25

NODA and MARUYAMA (1958a).

tudes, the birefringence of insect actomyosin is twice that of rabbit. The birefringence of crayfish or clam actomyosin is smaller than that of insect or rabbit actomyosin. One of the reasons why An of myosin B per unit protein concentration varies widely in different animals may be related to the extent of contamination by myosin, as suggested by the rise in x values at high G as in the crayfish or clam (cf. MARUYAMA, 1959). It is rather striking that the ATP effect is the smallest in,insect myosin B. * ThB ratio was based on the protein concentration (gramme per litre). However, the concentration of the actin may be somewhat overestimated, because actin was not highly purified.



INSECT ACTOMYOSIN.

A FLOW

Changes during pupal an’d post-emergence

BIREFRINGENCE

285

STUDY

development

As previously reported (MARUYAMA, 1957a, b), the ATP-actomyosin system in honeybee thoracic muscle changes a little during pupal and post-emergence development: in the mid-stage of pupal development there is a sudden increase TABLE

~-FLOW

BIREFRINGENCE

PROPERTIES OF MYOSIN PUPAL DEVELOPMENT

B FROM

HONEYBEE

MUSCLE

DURING

Stage

Pupa, mid stage

I ATP LJ ___ ______ +

Pupa, later stage

I Adult, just emerged

G =0 se&

-I-

__ I

I

Adult, active I-I

+ +

G $00

I

/

1?2$

An

/ G =I0

1

100

/

1200

__

;:; 2.3 -

I

x

__

_.

::;

_. 0.5 0.6

-

10.1 14.0

8.0 11.7

45 32

124 85

206 182

8:;

I;;

138 97

224 182

7.0 9.5

6.6 8.4

116 85

210 192

289 282

6.6 8.1

5.9 6.7

135 117

250 228

325 353

1Z

I

I

I

in the actomyosin content, and thereafter no marked changes were observed in the activity level of ATPase or in the physicochemical properties, including viscosity and sedimentation constants with and without ATP. Unexpectedly, the flow birefringence properties were found to change in a characteristic way during metamorphosis. As summarized in Table 8, 0 gradually

FIG. 10. Extinctionangle (x)ofmyosin B kornhoneybee mid-pupa athigh velocitygradients (G). 0.05 per cent; 0-O : control;l ---~ :with ATP.

286

K. MARUYAMA

decreased, while An increased

during pupal and post-emergence - development. In addition, it should be emphasized that the effect of ATP was more pronounced in the earlier stages of development. In the mid-pupa, ATP considerably decreased An and increased x in a wide range of G (Fig. 10). DISCUSSION THE INTERACTION WITH

ATP

The most outstanding aspect of the interaction between insect myosin B in solution and ATP is the minor change in the DRF properties, although the viscosity, sedimentation pattern, and turbidity change greatly (MARUYAMA, 1957b), in contrast to crayfish myosin B (MARUYAMA, 1959).

50 0

500

1000 G,

1500



2000

WC-’

FIG. 11. Change in (x-G) relationship in mixtures of insect myosin B and myosin. 0 : 0.02 per cent myosin B (original sample); @ : 0.02 per cent + ATP; n : 0.02 per cent +ATP + 0.05 per cent myosin; x : + ATP + 0.07 per cent myosin. TABLE 9-FLow BIREFRINGENCE PROPERTIES OF MIXTURES OF INSECTMYOSINB AND MYOSININ THE PRESENCE OF ATP

x* 0.02% myosin B 0.05 yo myosin Myosin B + myosin Theoretical value?

c’s

41.5 12.8 15.1

A* l(j!5 4.5 23.5 17.8

* G = 1700 set-I. t Calculated from Sadron’s formulae (4, 5).

Since the original work of SZENT-GY~RGYI (1945), it has been generally accepted that ATP dissociates actomyosin solution into myosin and actin and this dissociation theory was confirmed by a flow birefringence study (NODA and, MARUYAMA, 1958a, b).

INSECT

ACTOMYOSIN.

A

FLOW

BIREFRINGENCE

STUDY

287

Judged from the change in An and x, the complete dissociation of insect actomyosin into its components does not occur with ATP, and only a partial dissociation takes place. We are led to assume that the interaction between myosin and actin still exists in the presence of ATP. Namely, the interaction between myosin and actin is rather strong in the insect. As indirect evidence, the change in x and An upon the addition of pure myosin to actomyosin in the presence of ATP is presented in Fig. 11 and Table 9. If there is no molecular interaction between the added myosin and myosin B, we can calculate the theoretical values of x and An from the formulae of SADRON (cf. CERF and SCHERAGA, 1952): tan 2 x = C&sin i

2#,/FS$ cos 2&

(An)? = (F Z$sin 2#02 + (x 6%cos 2+!# i

(4) (5)

where the i species of particles which, if present alone, would give the observed values: Q!Qand 6$ of the extinction angle and birefringence, respectively, at the same velocity gradients. As listed in Table 9, the actual values of x and An of the combined solution were appreciably different from the theoretical ones: An of the former was larger than the latter; on the other hand, x was smaller. This fact suggests that there was certainly some kind of interaction between myosin and actomyosin in the presence of ATP. Very possibly myosin interacts with the actin partner in the myosin B particle. In fact, in the similar experiments with rabbit actomyosin, the theoretical values agree well with the observed ones (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958a). The decrease in An at low G with ATP may be possibly due to partial dissociation of actomyosin and also to breaking up of some kind of network of actomyosin particles (cf. TONOMURA and MATSUMIYA, 1958). The recovery of decreased An at high G may be due to the orientation of particles, but the complete explanation remains to be elucidated. ATP caused no detectable effect on An of myosin or of actin alone, respectively. The An of myosin, actin, and actomyosin were all positive so that we can expect that myosin particles attach to actin filaments, the major axes being parallel. The influence of PP on the DRF properties of insect actomyosin merits special attention. The PP effect was more remarkable than the ATP one: x at high G markedly increased and An decreased in the whole range of G (Fig. 3 and Table 2). In this case, dissociation certainly appears to have taken place to a considerable extent. In short, PP was more effective on insect actomyosin than ATP in the presence of a sufficient amount of Mg++, although in rabbit, the action of ATP and of PP are quite equal (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958). The effects of ATP and PP are more clearly seen in the reconstituted actomyosin than in the natural actomyosin described above (Figs. 2, 8, and 9). In the presence of PP, the x and An values are approximately equal to those calculated from Sadron’s formulae (4, 5), as seen in Table 10.

288

K.

MARUYAMA

However, there arises some serious doubt as to the partial dissociation hypothesis in the presence of ATP. It is concerned with the profound decrease in the viscosity of insect actomyosin as well as the change in the sedimentation pattern in the presence of ATP (MARUYAMA, 1957a, b). TAELE lo--FLOW BIRRFRINGENCEPROPERTIESOF INSECT SYNTHETIC ACTOMYOSIN AND ITS COMPONENTS IN COMPARISON WITH THE THEORETICALDATA

A* (“)

.0.025 O/omyosin 0.025 O/o actin 0.05% +ATP 0.05 yo + PP Myosin + actint

2.8 7.3 7.7 10.9 16.0 17.9

0.033% myosin _. 0.017 o/o actin 0.05 o/o actornyosin 0.05 y. +ATP 0.05 y. + PP Myosin + actinf

42.8 7.3 14.7 18.0 21.0 23.4

0.05 o/0actomyosin

2.9 1z.i 13.0 8.0 7.8 ;:; 10.5 ;::, 6.6

* Data at G = 1200 set-r. + Calculated from Sadron’s formulae (4, 5).

The viscosity data shown in Table 4 were obtained by using the conventional Ostwald viscometer at high G and the solution of relatively higher protein concentration was employed for tests, where molecular interaction plays a predominant

FIG. 12. Viscosity of insect and rabbit myosin B in dilute protein concentrations (C). Mean velocity gradient = 100 set-i; insect : 0 (control) ; @I(with ATP) ; rabbit : A (control) ; A (with ATP). The system consisted of 0.6 M KCl, 0.02 M Tris buffer and 1.5 mM MgCl, at pH 7.0 and 2O”C&O~l”C.

INSECT ACTOMYOSIN.

289

A FLOW BIREFRINGENCESTUDY

role in the viscosity. Therefore the very dilute solution (from 0.01 per cent to O-1 per cent) was tested for viscosimetry at mean G of 100 set-l. The results are shown in Fig. 12 in comparison with the rabbit. The decrease in viscosity with ATP was certainly found to a lesser extent in the insect than in the rabbit. Possibly the change in viscosity may be explained by the disappearance of the interaction between actomyosin molecules and of loosening of the actomyosin complex with ATP. The separation of myosin from myosin B might be due to the shift of the following equilibrium to the right through the removal of actin by centrifugation: AM+M+A It is of great interest that the recovery of pure myosin in the supernatant was much smaller (30 per cent of the original concentration) in the insect than in the rabbit (60 per cent). It is not clear whether this is due to the larger amount of actin in the actomyosin or to the larger extent of the myosin-actin interaction. Both might be responsible. COMPARATIVE

VIEW

As described in the section ‘Results’, the An of insect actomyosin is very great in comparison with that of rabbit, crayfish, and clam’myosin B. Since the orientation factors of crayfish and clams actomyosin are smaller, direct comparison at the same velocity gradient is not appropriate (CERF and SCHERAGA, 1952); in these protein solutions, pure myosin appears to have been a contaminant to a considerable extent. Nevertheless it is certain that the optical factor of insect myosin B is the greatest among the actomyosins tested. MEHL (1940) reported the DRF properties of (acto) myosins from several animals (snail, octopus, and sting ray), and the An of the preparations are much smaller than that of the insect under similar experimental conditions. In addition, ATP had much effect on the myosin B molecules from rabbit, crayfish, and clam muscles, but not on the insect myosin B. It has been considered that, at least in the rabbit, myosin first dissolves into extracting medium, say Weber-Edsall solution, and then myosin is gradually transformed into actomyosin in combination with actin, although the precise situation remains obscure (NODA and MARUYAMA, 1958b). In insect muscle, this is not the case. As was shown in an elegant manner in locust muscle (GILMOUR and CALABY, 1953), and later confirmed by the present author’s experiments (MARUYAMA, 1954a, 1957b, 1958b), actomyosin is directly solubilized from the beginning. This fact and the large birefringence suggest that the intact actomyosin filaments in the sarcomeres may be separated into the solution, retaining the structure in situ to some extent. The length of actomyosin approximates that of one sarcomere (- 3 ,u) (PHILPOTT and SZENT-GY~RGYI, 1955). Hodge slightly

(1955)

during

bee actomyosin

reported

contraction, sol with

that birefringence which

ATP.

of insect

myofibrils

is the case in the flow

The

relatively

strong

decreases

birefringence

interaction

only

of honey-

between

myosin

290

K. MARUYAMA

and actin might have somehow a close bearing upon the very quick contractionrelaxation cycle in insect flight muscle. With respect to this point, it is of importance that a greater degree of the interaction occurs upon the onset of the actual physiological function of the flight muscle in the honeybee life-span. The fine structure of myofibrils undergoes a marked development during pupal development of the honeybee (KOSHIHARA and M,ARUYAMA,1958). Here, however, it should be pointed out that the respiratory enzyme systems in sarcosomes play a dominant role in the actual flight of the insect, as clearly shown in honeybee muscle (MARUYAMAand MORIWAKI, 1958). The special physicochemical characteristics of the ATP-utilizing system in myofibrils and the high efficiency of the ATP-supplying system in sarcosomes might make possible a very rapid contraction in insect flight muscle. SUMMARY Flow birefringence properties of myosin B or natural actomyosin, myosin, actin, and synthetic actomyosin from honeybee thoracic muscle were investigated with special reference to their interaction with ATP. Extraction of honeybee muscle with strong salt solution even in the presence of pyrophosphate always yielded myosin B, the viscosity of which was lowered with ATP. Direct extraction of myosin could be done, using 0.6 M KI solution as an extractant. Flow birefringence properties of insect myosin B were only a little affected with ATP: the amount of flow birefringence was lowered with ATP only at low velocity gradients and rotary diffusion constant increased slightly, in a wide in the range of velocity gradients. Myosin was separated by ultracentrifuging presence of ATP, which reacted with F-actin to form actomyosin after ATP was dialysed away. The molecular length of insect myosin B ranged from 3.3 to 1.1 TVand from 3.0 to O-9 p.~with and without ATP. Myosin was from 1700 to 2000 A in length. The molecular dimension of F-actin was not clearly determined owing to its very complicated behaviour at a shear stress. The comparative study of crayfish and clam myosin B as well as that of rabbits reveals a special behaviour of insect myosin B as regards the flow birefringence properties: the amount of flow birefringence per unit protein concentration was very high and the effect of ATP was relatively small, although PP was more effective than ATP. It is tentatively suggested that the interaction between myosin and actin even in the presence of ATP exists to a considerable extent in insect myosin B. The present findings are also discussed in connexion with the physiological function of insect flight muscle. Acknowledgements-1 wish to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. H. NODA(Univ. ,Tokyo), where most of this work was carried out, for his helpful advice and stimulating ,discussion. I am deeply indebted to Drs. Y. TONOMURA (Hokkaido Univ.) and F. OOSAWA My grateful thanks are also due to Professor J. ‘(Nagoya Univ.) for their kind criticism. ISHIDA (Univ. Tokyo) for his kind interest, and to Dr. D. R. KOMINZ (Univ. Tokyo; National Institutes of Health, Md.) for his help in the preparation of the manuscript.

INSECTACTOMYOSIN. A FLOW BIREFRINGENCE STUDY

291

REFERENCES ASAKURAS., HOTTA K., IMAI N., 001 T., and OOSAWAF. (1958) G-F transformation of actin by divalent cations. Conference on the chemistry of muscular contraction, pp. 5765. Tokyo. BARANY M., BARANY K., and GURA F. (1957) Preparation of actin without extraction of myosin. Nature, Lond. 179, 818-819. BINKLEY F. (1948) Birefringence of flow of preparations of myosin. J. biol. Chem. 174, 385-387. CERR R. and SCHERAGAH. A. (1952) Fl ow birefringence of macromolecules. Chem. Rev. 51,185-261. DAINTY M., KLEINZELLERA., LAWRENCEA. S. C., MIALL M., NEEDHAMJ., NEEDHAM D. M., and SHENS. C. (1944) Studies on the anomalous viscosity and flow-birefringence of protein solutions. III. Changes in these properties of myosin solutions in relation to adenosinetriphosphate and muscular contraction. J. gen. Physiol. 27, 355-399. GERGELYJ. and MARTONOSIA. (1958) The demonstration of actin in natural actomyosin (Myosin B). Fed, Proc. 17, 227. GILMOUR D. and CALASY J. H. (1953) Physical and enzymatic properties of actomyosins from the femoral and thoracic muscles in an insect. Enzymologia 16, 23-33. HASSELBACH W. and SCHNEIDER G. (1951) Der L-Myosin und Aktingehalt des Kaninchenmuskels. Biochem. Z. 321, 462475. HIPPEL P. H. VON, GELLERTM. F., and MORALESM. F. (1958) Some physical and enzymatic phenomena in solutions in myosin B. Conference on the chemistry of muscular contraction, pp. 1-13. Tokyo. HODGEA. J. (1955) Studies on the structure of muscle. III. Phase contrast and electron microscopy of dipteran flight muscle. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 1, 361-380. JOLY M., SCHAPIRAG., and DREYFUSJ. C. (1955) Length of myosin particles in dilute solutions determined by ilow birefringence. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 59, 165-180. KOSHIHARAH. and MARUYAMAK. (1958) Changes in fine structure of honeybee thoracic muscle. Sci. Pap. Coll. Gen. Educ., Univ. Tokyo 8, 213-216. MARUYAMA K. (1954a) Studies on adenosinetriphosphatases of various insect muscles. J. Fat. Sci., Tokyo Univ. (4) 7, 231-270. MARUYAMAK. (1954b) The activity change of actomyosin-adenosinetriphosphatase during insect metamorphosis. Biochim. biophys. Acta 14, 284-285. MARUYAMAK. (1957a) Interaction between ATP and actomyosins from honeybee muscles during pupal development. 2. veygl. Physiol. 40, 451-453. MARUYAMAK. (195713) A further study of insect actomyosin. Sci. Pap. Coll. Gen. Educ., Univ. Tokyo 7, 213-241. MARUYAMA K. (1957~) Contractile proteins from adductors of MeTetrix and Cristaria. Annot. zool. jap. 30, 63-66. MARUYAMAK. (1958a) Contractile protein from crayfish tail muscle. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole 114, 95-105. MARUYAMA K. (1958b) Interaction of insect actomyosin with adenosine triphosphate. J. cell. camp. Physiol. 51, 173-188. MARUYAMA K. (1959) Flow birefringence studies of crayfish myosins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82, 422-430. MARUYAMAK. and MORIWAKI K. (1958) Respiratory enzyme systems and muscular function in honeybee thoracic muscle. Enzy&zologia 19, 211-219. MAXUYAMAK. and TONOMURAY. (1957) Comparative biochemical studies of the ATPmyosin B system. r. Res. Inst. Catalys. Hokkaido 5, 55-70. MEHL W. J. (1940) Studies on the proteins of smooth muscle. II. The myosins of the octopus, snail, sea cucumber and sea anemone. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole 79, 488497.

292

K. MARUYAMA

MURALT A. L. VONand EDSALLJ. T. (1930a) Studies in the physical chemistry of muscle globulin. III. The anisotropy of myosin and the angle of isocline. J. biol. Chem. 89, 315-350. MURALT A. L. VONand EDSALLJ. T. (1930b) Studies in the physical chemistry of muscle globulin. IV. The anisotropy of myosin and double refraction of flow. r. biol. Chem. 89, 351-386. NODA H. and MARUYAMAK. (1958a) Interaction of myosin B with ATP. A flow birefringence study. Biochim. biophys. Acta 30, 598-608. NODA H. and MARUYAMAK. (1958b) Flow birefringence properties of various myosin B preparations. Biochim. biophys. Acta 32, 263-264. PHILPOTT D. E. and SZENT-GY~~RGYI A. (1955) Observations on the electron microscopic structure of insect muscle. Biochim. biophys. Actu 18, 177-182. SCHERAGA H., EDSALLJ. T., and GADDJ. 0. (1951) Double refraction of flow: numerical evaluation of extinction angle and birefringence as a function of velocity gradient. J. them. Phys. 19, 1101-1108. SZENT-GY~RGYIA. (1945) Studies on muscle. Acta Physiol. Stand. 9, suppl. 25, l-128. SZENT-GY~RGYIA. (1951) Chemistry of muscular contraction, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York. SZENT-GYBRGYIA. G. (1951) A new method for the preparation of actin. y. biol. Chem. 192, 361-369. TONOMURAY. and MATSUMIYAH. (1958) Rotary diffusion of actomyosin. Biochim. biophys. Acta 27, 311-318. WEBER A. (1956) The ultracentrifugal separation of I- myosin and actin in an actomyosin solution under the influence of ATP. Biochim. biophys. Acta 19, 345-351. WEBER H. H. and PORTZEHLH. (1952) Muscle contraction and fibrous proteins. Advanc. Protein Chem. 7, 161-252.