OO4&4020/86 S5.00 + .W Pergamon JournalsLId.
Te-trohcdronVol. 42. No. 20, pp. S591 lo 5600, 1986 Rioted inGreat Brimn.
INVESTIGATIONS OF THE NUCLEOPHILIC DISPLACEMENT AT THE TETRAHEDRAL PHOSPHORUS - KINETIC EFFECTS OF THE NUCLEOPHILE FOR A GIVEN STEREOCHE!41STRY.1
ROBERT J.P CORRIIJ, GERARD LECLERCQ.
F. LANNEAU and DOMINIQUE
Institut de Chlmie Fine. Unit6 Associee au CNRS no 1097 Universit& des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc 34060 MONTPELLIER Cedex, FRANCE.
(Received in France 23 July 1986)
Abstract - R ki?-&tic study of aZcohoZysis and antinotysis of Z-chlom-Z-oxo-1,3, P-dioxaphospholane, 1, shws a mte Zeus ZZing effect of the nucteophiti, where the stereochemistry is retelttion at phosphors. &I the other hand, the substitutions with inversion of the 2-chtorc-2-oxo-1,3, P-diozaphoephorinane & or the dizth~tchlorophosphate, J, sha, a marked infZuence of the nucleophtle upon the reactivity. Furthennore~ tFa large mte increase which has been observed for the hydroZysi8 oC the five-nre.nbered ring phosphorus esters compared to phosp&es (an oxygen atways displaces an ozygenl is not reproduced uben the Zeavirz group is different of the nucZ.eophiZe. !4e suggest thct the mechanistic implications, established in the ccse of phosphate esters hydroZySi8 crmnot be directly extended tc the generaZ case of s,+?(P). The mechcnism of nucZeophiZic substitution of P(4) species is better interpreted in zzems of IIOYO-Lb?.!,” interactions between the nucZeophiZe end the substrate, a process nw weZZ established in siticon chevtistrJ.
INTRODUCTION The mechanism of SN2(P) displacement of the P-X bond (X = halogen, OR, SR...) of
tetra-
coordinated species is commonly accepted to proceed through the initial formation of the P(5) 2-4 intermediate of trigonal bipyramidal (tbp) geometry. with apical entry of the nucleophile. The direct displacement of the leaving group ("ln-line" attack) gives inversion at phosphorus. Retention at P is explained by the initial formation of a tbp structure with the attacking nucleophile in apical position and the leaving group in equatorial position ("adjacent" attack). Then, ligand reorganization
(via pseudorotation or other) allows the apical departure of the leaving
group with retention. The key finding of these interpretations is the initial formation of the more stable tbp structure in terms of the relative apicophilicity of the different substituents r (Scheme l).' X Y
,+JX~ Y’
A
*o
*_b,b’ .Y
1 ,o’-’ 2L X-P' .NU
h
ti”
lx’Scheme
1
* ..... ,’ NuiP%
I-y’-’ A,
/’
‘P Nu' -0
,"w.",00" 5591
.111*110*
R. J. P. CORRIU er al.
A completely reochemistry function
of
species.
Front-side
sive
the
studies
factors
approach
upon
electronic
in
all
the
tionship
of
already
depends
on
and
tives’.
A further
rate
increase(l0’)
one
is
only In
nucleophile based
upon
cement ring
of
by Hall
for
observed
present the
the P-Cl
series
Inch’.
group
solvolysis
of
$2(P)
bonds
different
with
the
of
the
factors
have
way to at
to bc -Ab
inversion
displacement
ratio-
a
silicon.
.
structure
-
have
reactivity
ring
to
compare
nucleophiles
in
upon compound
more
closely
case of
the
Si
rela-
oxa
points
out
and P deriva-
(this)
reactivity.
silacyThe large
relative
to
the
acyclic
group.
changing
we have
This
of of
the 10
leaving
checked,
and phosphorrates.
substrate.
substitution
an oxygen
been
the
displacement
species
replaces
In order
tes.
endocyclic
involved
five-membered
reactions
phosphates
chlorophospha
ii)
intermediate.
the Walden
of
chief
group.
electronic
comparable
studies
and structure
the the
nucleophile
group. of
not
to
of nucleophilic
of
importance
paper,
P are
two Exten-
emphasize
and consistent
nucleophilic
the
groups for a given stereochemistry at phosphorus. 15 we have observed that the stereochemistry Wadsworth
leaving
an oxygen
leaving
Si.
the
of
a simple
of
corresponds
stereochemistries
hydrolysis
and acyclic
tvo work
showed
treatment
facts
to
leaving
ste-
a direct
inversion.
pentacoordinated
offered
was made concerning
the
the
orbital
between
us
the
the
is
and leaving
and
the
the
when
and
the
present
nucleophile,
emphasized
formed
explain
gives
allooed of
data
to
inversion,
(180’)
lability
initially
experimental
nucleophiles
comparison
cloalcanes,which
the
attack
kinetic
of Salem’s
in
the
between
the
silicon
and/or
organosilanes
i)
a new interpretation
invoked
of
of
silicon
of
stereochemical
reported
analogies
geometry
of
Back-side
Moreover.
an extension
incoming
nature
at
at
retention
terms of
substitution
basis,
purpose
in
retention.
nucleophile.
the
mechanisms
the
strong
the
using
between
As also
the
stereochemistry
On this
The main
gives
nucleophilic
kinetic
Obviously,
HOMO-LUMOinteractions
determining
performed.’
nalize
nucleophfle
the (90.)
the
calculations
been
of
the
character
essential
interpretation has been 6 The stereochemistry,
considered
reactions.
attack
governing
initio
different
of St,2 (Si)
the
vith
the
studied
the
nature
of
both
Uestheimer’s
data,
nucleophllic
five-membered
ring,
the
displa-
six-membered
11
RESULTS Kinetics ------__ Organochlorophosphates philic
substitutions
phorus
esters
of
which
give
have
2-0x0-1.3.2
dioxaphosphorinane Water, hsve
or ring
cleavage
the
hydrolysis
than of
the
first
phosphorus In all
phile.
The rate
the
of 2, one salt
to
experimental P-Cl
bond rate
values
than
phosphates
quantitative, attack
at
avoid ring
have
secondary
been
the
adjacent
section)
the
the
carbon
The nucleo-
reaction of phos12 atom. Kinetic I-chloro-
2. used
ester.
constant
as nucleophiles. like
The only
(TEPP). rate
alcohols. to
dioxaphospholane.2,
reactions,
phosphorus
vlth
compared
Z-chloro-2-oxo-1,3,2
:
tetraethylpyrophosphate
(see
the
the
of
and diethylamine
vith
constant
are
and O,O-diethylchlorophosphate,
five-membered gave
reactive
amines
products
-2.
in order
which
cases,
much more vith
on 3 models
phenol
chosen of
the
performed
ethanol,
been
bonds
also
experiments
ditions
been
are
P-Cl
formation particular
Since the value
second
corresponds
Experimental of
con-
pyrophosphate. case
concerned
step
Is
to
the
faster formation
cleavage.
law
is
are
reported
first
order
in chlorophosphate
in Table
1.
and first
order
in nucleo-
Nuclcophilic
1 : second
Table
order
fate
displacement
constants
for
at the tetrahedral
e
\,dJ
o’ 1\CI
N204
0.01
ELal
0.11
PhOH
0.60
LC2NH
0.21 0.55
1 10
PhOH
0.29
I
IO-’
EC2NH
0.18
I
10-2
0.15
x
lo-‘
0.12
x
10-5
0.16
I
IO -1
o.iE
x
lo-’
*
ELmI mm E12W
solvent
In are
highly
It
= 104).
are
the
case
of
dependent Such
neasured
: CHjCN
six-membered
upon
the
various
ring
nature
is not
a difference
for
of
compound, the
2,
observed
in
the
thanol
or
of
derivative. are
strained
much more ,‘.
Very
_2,
the
k-values
reactive close
than rate
alcohols
constants
nucleophiles.
displacements
phosphorochloridates
have
Wadsworth
phosphorus
case
Amines
Table 2 : Stereochemical data of 4 with
Nucleophilic
inversion.14
and acyclic
nucleophile.
Ster.3xhernistry ________-_____
at
in CH2C12).
-6
E LO”
n2o
l
0-C
0.20
K2O
.O ‘P / 0 ‘Cl
c
(at
““H
Reactant
0
chlorophosphates
of
solvolysis
5593
phosphorus
in
amines
the
been
shovn
reported
the
acyclic
nucleophiles
to give
also
coupling
with
of
inversion
reaction
of
me-
Z-chloro-Z-oxo-S-
chloromethyl-S-methyl-1,3,2,dioxaphosphorina15 ne. Ke have reinvestigated that stereochemis31 try using P NMR under our kinetic experimental
conditions
is
predoninant
the
(Table
2).
inversion
The essential at
feature
phosphorus,
whatever
nucleophile.
Sucleophilic xmbered ‘known
ring to
substitutions
of
thio-phosphorochloridates
proceed
The
stereochemical
the
compounds
is
with
retention
s?Jdies reported
have in
fiveare
at been
scheme
phosphorus. extended 2.
For
16 to
phosphorochloridates.
comparison,
we have
also.
The synthetic prepared
the
thio
approach derivative.
to
R.
5594
l(OlPcl) _
J. P. CORIW et
al.
solwnl
3
NO b 2’1. lb’!.
Scheme 2
Treatment of t,3-butanedlol(maso) with PC13 gives the Z-chloro-4.5-dimethyl-1,3,2-diouphospholane (92 X trans). The oxidation Is stereoselective. The same predominant Isomer Is directly formed by coupling reaction of of pyrldlne. If
t,3-butanedlol(meso) with (0)PC13, In the presence of
a large excess
only 2 equivalents of pyrldlne are introduced, the mixture contains the -cls major
lsooe:.17 The assignments as to -cls and trans configurations of the phosphorochlorldate 5 have been 18 'H NMR chemical shifts data. Protons In 1,3 -cis position relative to P = 0 are shifted downfield, vlth also a different coupling constant (Table 3).
made on the basis of
Table
1
: “P
and
’ H N:HR data of I-substituted-
i-cx?4,5-dImethyl-1,3,2
dioraphospho1ane.J.
.. The stereochemistries of nucleophlllc substitutions have been checked by means of “P
NMR
(Tabie 4). In the case of
dlethylamlno coumpound, double resonance 'H NMR technique confirms our assign. 31 P chemical shift at higher mentsof the configurations. We note that the trans Isomers present a 16 field than the cis isomers. The same variation 1s observed In the case of the thlo compound. Based upon our assignments of configuration, the main result Is a change of stereochemistrs, vhen we compare the sFx-membered ring compound 5 (predominant Inversion) and the strained five-nrbered
chlorophosphorus ester.2,
(retention).
5595
Nucleophilic displacement at the tetrahedral phosphorus DISC’.‘SSION Kinetic
results
1, and acyclic
pound,
emphasize
the difference
chlorophosphate,
Table
3 (Table
in reactivity 5)
between five-membered
ring
com-
: Figure
5
1
&tOH PhOH
J
solvcnc
CHjCN
The ratio EtOH (105), influence
of
as a function correspond
exemplified.
case
a ratio, of
of
kc5/kac
hydrolysis
of
That means the Westheimer’s
leaving
rate
constants
of
the
reactivity, that
of
For instance.
that
high fall
In the case
EtOh, a large
for
in the case
down to 7.5.
1, in which the rate
(P) reactant. the rate
of
constants
the Et2NH, close
kc5/kac of
kc5kac
of
The
change of reactivity
constants
the hydrolysis
3.4 x 102, much Lower than the ratio phosphate
significantly
which the ratio
in fig.
vhereas
the ratio
group.
is
for
illustrated
the geometry
the leaving
concepts
the
is
is very depen-
chloro
compounds
106-1Og observed
in the
esters.
the Large kinetic
effect
is not confirmed
which has been essential
in the case
of different
in the elaboration
nuclcophiles
of
and different
group. As a matter
extension
of
we must note
Heanvhile,
order
of diethylamine,
is even better
to a similar
upon the nature
gives
the second
to the reaction
the nucleophile
are reported Ln k values dent
between
compared
of
these
were established
fact
,
the
present
results
to the generality
in the case
(an oxygen displaces membered ring
of
concepts
of
an oxygen).
the hydrolysis What we note,
compounds is no more a rude
reasses
the question
of nucleophilic
implying
of P-O bonds, now. is
, as far
that
as this
6 (ref.
the large
of the
rate
These
intermediates
increase
of five-
s-jmmetry disappears. the same conclusions
been already 10)
the validity at phosphorus.
syazaetrical
Interestingly, Table
of
displacements
reached
of kinetic
and stereochemical
hydrolysis
and methanolysis
membered ring
of retention,
expected bonds.
studies of five
of and six-
oxasilacycloalcanes.
dominant stereochemistry stead
have
from the comparison
The pre-
is inversion
in-
which is the normally
pathway for
the cleavage
The five-membered
an enhanced reactivity.
of Si-0
ring compound shows Such a rate
increase
is not observed
when the incoming atom of
the nucleophile
is not an oxygen (i.e.
bon nucleophilesl. rates
with five
Lacycloalcanes,
These react
and six-membered whatever
car-
at similar ring oxasi-
the stereochemistry.
R. J. P. CORRIUet al.
5596 The particular of
behaviour
cleophile
and
ge”,
to
fact,
this
smetry
the
reaction becveen
In
the
osasilacyclopentane
(Table
corresponds In
of
of
chiasilacyclopentane
large
rate
takes
place
leaving
of is
surrounded
leaving
have
to
be
The pencacoordinated
increase with
hydrolysis
atom
oxygen
increased
group
The phosphorus
in
HO’
p
0
OH
u
This
the
geometry
In
do not of
the
t
&
OH
change
with
at
(Table comes
1).
For
That
Su at
the at
the 1oe.
that
the
relative
nucleophile. 180’
2 x
opposite
vhich
of
with
the
leaving hand,
to
leaving
(0.1
0, C
rate
RO..l “p-
Fig.2
0
leaving
group,
group) in
group)
the
reactions
the
race
(4
is
in
is
is
three
(attack
at
go’),
attack,
b)
equatorial
evident electronic
for
could
c)
the
character
geometries attack,
a”
O-P
of
I
tl sibilities, persutational
this which
monent. are
of
isomerisations.
OH
there
is
similar The
energies. important
with
been
of
the
tbp
for
the
pyramidal
in
Ue observe
opposite,
account
mutual
setting
the
a square
It
geometry,
the
in
be-
to
the attack of
attack
the
con-
case
of
Therefore,
is
the
conceivable the
apical
case
that,
stability
electronic
is inter-
positions.
a large
the
experimental geometry.
of_3
Such
in
in-
nucleophile
nature
2).
case
to
(apical
silicon.
apply.
upon
groups
the
the
reached
mem-
the
(adjacent
upon
at
could of
in
related
on Nu (Fig
pathvay.
Nu. At
of
inversion
substitutions
dependent
hand,
strongly
already
intermediate
five
constants
correspond
retention
independent
rate
: a)
facts
in-
retention
of
(Scheme
4)2’
betveen
the
apical
@
'Nu
no definite
other
nature
is
dependent
have
the
and ethanolysis
vith
inversion
a priori
formation
the
of
< (-y,o_ At
quite
highly
actions
the
60 \
rate
vould
reactivity
proceeding
strongly
particularly upon
aminolysis
same explanations
lnrrrrlon (‘no’) This
for
nucleophilic
RO 5
depending
with
proceeding
rate
the
On the
change
the
reactions
NU
crease
P
of
order
stereochemistry
constants
clusions Cl
0/
substitution
The second
< k < 0.7).
predominant
In the
other
Nucleophilic retention.
considerably
the
a given
On the the
3).
3
observed.
the
constants
ratio
for
are
proceeds
substitution. to
the
evidenced. (Schema
!
the nucleophile
for
rate
-
of
90’
the
means
steraocheraistry
of
2,
example,
%*NH’kE tokl
two cases always
nature
phosphorus,
involved. and
(Retention)
I,
the
are oxygen
activation
-
c O_PIOH
OH
work,
diethylchlorophosphate,
version
of
present
chlorophosphate
importance
and recently
for
osy-
CH30
Scheme
ring
the
species
by Westheimer,
= 33).
another
intermediate.
entering
(Inversion)
bered
tbp
nu-
(tc6/tcj
emphasizes
the
the
oxygrn
displaces
oxygenated
cases,
prosper
3
in
by a”
cons:rai”t
oxygen
nucleophile only
and mechanolysis
group
angular
to
configuration.
as proposed
3 ‘p--3 HO’,
-
‘0
1
0
leaving
when a”
In such
present
by hydrolysis
thio due
esters,
oxygens.
positions,
CH
of
incoming
phosphorus
always
out
the
observed
inversion
of
apical
of
only
and the
/OC”J \\
pointed
reactivity
is
by five
intermediate 0
is
The displacement
a reasonable
the
case
6).
Scheme argument
Moreover point
allowing
the is
that
three in
to
G decide
structures these
three
can
also
three
rearrange
configurations,
the
posby tuo
Nuclcophilic
exchanging
ligands
incoming
orthogonal
nucleophiles.
Initial pect
stay
formation
each if
In fact, of
the
of
other,
which
we considered,
intermediate
=n extra-scabilisation
the
with
apical
O-atoms
implies
a “minimum”
according attack
in diaxial or
to of
alcohol
dered
.>I3
Figure
when the
l_ reacts
ex-
is
with
oxygenated
or
be a more
water rhe chlo-
all
the
not,
the
probable
certainly ___ _ _ - -_ through the formation ramid (attack 5 on a face).
3
the
experimentally,
similarly
could
the
also
nucleophile
Since
(Fig.3).
to
proposals, we would
th,e nucleophile,
entry
due
effect
Westheimer’s
nucleophiles,
torial
a”
A.
the
positions,
rophosphate _;;I
5597
displacement at the tetrahedral phosphorus
of
consiequa-
process, a square-py-
coscLUsIoX The experimental haps
any
case
other
since
the
large
ced
when
reaction
it
behaves
rate the
cas*
in
leaving
the
of nucleophilic On the
and
leaving
“in
line”
phile
and
opposite, of
it
the
the in
orthogonal
substitutions
is
of
group
adjacent exchanging organosilicon
:
the
process
esters
considered
nucleophilic
and per-
as a special
displacement.
For
derivatives
cannot
nucleophile,
both
in P and Si
chemistry.
directly
extend
the
Westheimer’s
five-membered
ring
relationship
rhe
be
instance,
reprodu-
concepts,
esta-
to
general
phosphates
of at
between
stereochemical
corresponds
influence (attack
phosphate be
the
species.
upon
inversion
of
can
ring
structure-reactivity
dependent
giving
case
strained
P(4)
strained
five-membered
the to
of
an oxygen
general
of
of
at
the
hydrolysis
for
difficult
hydrolysis
highly
(180’)
the
different
hand,
the
displaces
observed
substitutions
leaving the
is
the
other
groups attack
is
appears
of
that
from
which group
case
show
an oxygen
differently
increase
Therefore, blished
facts in which
the
90”
to
behaviour
large
is
retention),
ligands.
between
essential we note
The same results were previously 22 dompounds . They emphasize the analogy
nucleophiles.
phosphorus.
interactions
nucleophile
giving
incoming at
The
the
nucleo-
(Ak = 104).
At the
a levelling
effect
noted between
for
nucleophiiic the
two series.
EXPERI?fENTAL 1 Reactions were carried out In Schlenk tubes under dry N2 R NMR spectra were recorded on Varian EM 360 or M 390 instruments vith TMS as internal reference. 31~ NMR spectra were seasured at 32.37 MHZ on a Fourier Transform Brucker Up 80. Positive chemical shifts are downfield relative to external 85 X A3PO,, diluted in D20 (lock signal). Rtactants ----____Some compounds are prepared according to literature, Z-chloro-2-oxo-1,3,24ioxaphospholane, 2. 21r 2-chloro-2-oxo-1,3,2_dioxaphosphosphorinane, 2, 23 diethylchlorophosphate,3,24, 2-chloro5-chloromethyl-5-methyl-2-oxo-l,3,2-diox hosphorinane, 4, 15. They present the structural features in 3 Pp NtlR (CH2C12). 1, 6p + 22.2 ppm ; 2, 6p - 2.7 FPm ; 6p - 3.16 ppm. 6P - 3.10 ppn ; 5, 31 2-chloro-~,5-diaethvl-2-oxo-1,3.2-dioxauhospholane,
.5
Addition of 2,3 butane dial (meso) to trichlorophosphine in dichloromethane Lucas, 25 leads predominantly to trans 2-chloro-4,5-dimethyl-1,3,2_dioxaphospholane. cicn in benzene affords the title product, 2. bp(O.35)87’C, 6H fCDC13) 1.46 ppm (d, 6H) 4.93 ppm (m, 2H). 4.86 ppm t3JP_H 12.9 Hz, Sp (CH2C1,) - 19.4 ppm MZISS spectrum : m/e H+ 170 Found : C, 28.18 ; H, 4.64 ; P. Cl, 2O.62-C&H803PCl Required : C. 28.15 ; H, 4.69 ; P, 18.18 ; Cl, 20. 82 X. The same product is obtained by dropwisc addition co a solution of butane-2,3-dial meso (0.015 mole) in lh. The ‘n filtration of the pyr id inium salt and evaporation of 2. 5% (C3C13) 4 .86 ppm 75 x, 5.03 ppm 25 X. O’C for
Prtdomlnant cis 1 is obtained by dropping and pyridine3.0314 mole) in THF (5 ml) (:3 ~1) and then usual vork-up. 6Ht~~Cl3) TO ?. 6p (CH2C1,) - 19.A ppm
of
trichlorophosphine pyridlne (15
lxcea.q excess
pyr id ine
in
at 0-C a solution of butane-2,3-dial to a solution of trichlorophosphate A.8 ppm (3JP_H - 9.3 Hz) 30 X-S.03
ml) VSCUO
accordin? to Then.
oxida-
-15 %). 18.15 ;
(0.015 with leads
mole) at stirring
to
trans
meso (0.0157 mole) (0.0157 mole) in TRF ppm (3JP_H - 12.9 HZ)
R. J. P. CORRIUet al.
5598
2-~h~oro-~,5-dFmeth~l-2-thio-l,3,2-dioxaphospholane
a,f;?cr3) a,(cu2c12)
tfanS cis
: a.90
ppm Cm, 2s)
: 77.68 ppm, trans
l.kZ
!XX
&and
5y.(~x13f cis 4.90 ppm cm. 2s) 1.46 ppm cd, 68) ppm (d,
were prepared
according
to Lovez3.
611)
: 76.02 ppn
Prozucts ________ The general procedure is described. A solution of nucleophile (0.05 mole) and triethylamine (0.05 mole) in dichtoromethane (Sn!) is dropped to a solution of appropriate chlorophosphate (0.05 mole) in dichloromethane is removed. Benzene (10 ml) is added to the (10 ml). After stirring for 2 h, the solvent resiCue in vacua. The salt is filtered off and benzene is removed.
Subs:itutions
__________________ NuI!
=
of
1
XeOH 68 (CDCl3)
3.9 ppm (d,
Xi,
3J~H3p = 14 HZ)
4.52 ppa (m, Qi). bp (CH2CQ) = 18.1 ppm. “u:1 I EtOH 6” (CDCl3) 1.37 ppm (t, 3H), 4.50
ppm (m, 6H),
6p (CH2C12) - 17.1 ppm
sue - PhOH 6g (CDCl3) 4.3 ppm (m, 4H1, 7.23 ppm (m, SH), 6p (CH2C12) - 11.5 ppm SUL-= Et2h’H 6B (CDCl3) 1.16 ppm (t, 6x1, 3.10 ppm (m, 6H), 4.33 ppm (m, 4Hf 6p (CH2C12) = 26.27 (t,
In the case of hydrolysis of J, two equivalents of triethylamine were used. 9K) 3.0 ppm (q. 6H), A.1 ppm (d, 4H, 3Jp_~ - 10 Hz) 6p (CH3CN) - 16.6 ppm. of
Substitutions -------__------__~
ppm.
dK(D20)l.l
ppm
2
SuH - PhOH 6”. (CDc13) 1.80 ppm (m, 2H). 4.02 ppm (m, &II), 7.32 ppm (s, SH) 6p (CH2’212) - -13.5 (CH2C12) su’r! = Et2NH - +686.8(CLC13) 1.13 ppm (t, 6W, 1.90 ppm Cm, 2H), 3.19 ppm (m, 48) * 4.45 ppm (m, 4W, ppe KuP * Et08 A large excess of titative yield. 65 fCX13) 1.4 ppr- (c, 30,
ethanol 2.0
(10 equivalents)
ppm (m, 2gf,
4.3
is necessary
ppm (a,
6H),
to obtain
bp (CH,Cf2)
the product
PPm 6P
in quan-
- - 7.3 ppm.
Su5s:itutions of 3 ________________ 6H
NuY * ?hOB
ScE - Et2XH 6” (CDC13) 1.10 ppm (t.
6H1, 4.2
ppm (m, 4H),
6H1, t .30 ppm (t,
7.37 ppa (m. 5H).
6H),
6P(CK2C12C12) = -6.5ppm
3.07 ppm (m, 4H),
3.97 ppm (m, W,
c, KE,C12) 10.03 ppn Ku:-:* EtOH - A large
excess
of ethanol
is
necessary
5.16 ppa Cm, 6111, 6, (CH Cl ) - 1.08 ppm NUE - H,O - Tetraethylpyrop 2 f, osphate (TEPP) is
diethylphosphoric 6h (CDC13) 1.60
acid.
ppn
(t,
12H).
6.26
(10
obtained
ppm (m, 8H),
eq.).
instead
6P(CH3CN) = -
bH (CDCl3) 1.43 ppm (t.
of the triethylammonium
9@,
salt
of
13.54 ppm
Prezrration of diethylphosehoric acid _---_____---_-_-_--- --- _____-___ 1 (0.018 mole) is dissolved in hot vater (15 ml). Extraction vith chloroform (4 x 2Om.l) gives diethylphosphoric acid (0.011 mole). 6” eDC13) 1.36 ppm ct. 6H), 4.13 ppm (Is, 4Hf, 11.7 ppm (s. 1H) 6P (CH2C12) 0 ppm. After addition of excess Et3N 6P (CH2C12) = 1.73 ppm. Preosration of tetraethylgyrophosphate _________---________--_ __ _- ____ A solution of 2 (2.4 moles) in acetoaitrile (1 ml) is added to a solution of diethylphoj)horic acid (2.4 mmoles) and triethylamine (2.4 nxnoles) in acetonitrile (1 ml). Triethylamncniun chloride deposites quickly. After filtration and evaporation of the solvent TBPP is obtainad in quantitative yield. Ste:aoc>emi.stry ______________ The
substitutions
chtzistry is attributed
of i and S follow the same procedure than that forA and 2. Stereoare reported d Tables 2,4. by means of ‘: HhR and/or 31 P NMR. The results
Kinarics ----_.%___ Dichloromethane sive
disrillations
Methanol
and ethanol
(x
is distilled over P 0 under nitrogen. Acetonitrile is dried by succesover KOH in pel1ets before distillation. P 0 . Amines ar8 sefluxed are diseil I2e over magnesium methoxide and magnesium ethoxide. respectively. 3)
over
Kinatics method _--_______-___ AIiquots of the reaction mixture (S ml) are run The rates are measured by acidimetry. at -20°C into dichloromethane (25 ml), and a solution of chlorhydric acid in toluene is added. The amount of chlorhydric acid is calculated to be equal to the initial amount of the amine in the sample. The excess of acid is quickly back titrated with a standard solution of triechylamine in :oluane with neutral red as indicator.
Kinetics measurements ____._____________--. ALL kinetics runs were performed at O’C in ice bath. TVQ procedures were used depenFor a slow reaction the mixture of triethylamine and nueleoding on the rate of the reaction. of chlorophosphate in philr? in dichloromethane (25 ml) is added (at O’C) (t - 0) to a solution dicittorcmethane 125 ml) at O*C. Aliquots (5 ml) are titrated at various intervals. For fast reactions, 2.5 at of each solution are mixed and the same procedure applied. Second order rate eonscsnts were calculated from the equation 2 where a and b are the initial concentrations of phosphoroobloridate and nucleophile and x is the concentration of KC1 at time L. For the hydrolysis of 3, a different equation was necessary (eq.3). eq.2
kg--&-
Log
-
a(b-x) b(a-x) Table
eq.3
7 - Experimental lconeentrations
k2t = -+ rate
orders
in mol.1
Log
a
-c
a(b-x) bo
at 0°C 1
R. J. P. CORRIU et al.
5600 REFERENCES
a prelimfnary report, see R.J.P.Corriu, C.F.Lanneau and D.Leclercq, Tetrahedron Lett. 40 4323 (1983).
1
For
2
3
Ibid -. 5 204. F.H.Westhelmer, _---9 Accounts Chem. Res. 1 70. (1968) b) R.F.Hudson and C.Brova, -1 40 595. (1974). d) P.Gillespie, F.Ramirez, I.Ugi, (1972). c) S.Trippett, Pure Applied -Chem. -* D.Marquarding, e. Chem. Int. Ed. M., l2, 109. (1973). --For a general compilation see : W.E.Mc Even and K.D. Berlin "Organophosphorus Stereochemistry Benchmark Papers in Organic Chemistry", Vol.4, Dowden Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburgh USA,(l975; and Related Elements". R.Luckenbach : "Dynamic Stereochemistry _of Pentacoordinated Phosphorus -Thieme - Stuttgart (1973).
4
C.R.Hall and T.D. Inch, Tetrahedron, 36, 2059(1980) and references cited therein.
5
R.Holmes : "Pentacoordinated Phosphorus". American Chemical Society; Washington DC, (1980) ACS Monograph No 175-176. R.J.P.Corriu and C.Guerin - J.O?ganometal. Chem. 198, 231 (1980). Nguyen Trong Anh and C.Mf.not - -----9 J. Am. Chem. Sot. 102
103, (1980).
For a general discussion at Si see : R.J.P.Corriu and C.Cuerin, _A&. Crganometal. Chem. 20, 268, (i9Cij. 9
R.J.P.Corriu, J.P.Dutheil G.F.Latineau and S.Ould-Kada, Tetrahedron, 25, 2889, (1979). b) R.J.P.Corriu, J.P.Dutheil and G.F.Lanneau - Tetrahedron, x, 3687, (1981).
10
R.J.P.Corriu, J.M.Fernander and C.Guerin, ----2 Now. J. Chem.8 279, (1984). See for example : a) J.Kumamoto, J.H.Cox, Jr and F.H.Westheimer, J.&. -Chem. Sot. 78, 4858,(1956)b)H.G.Khorana, G.H.Tewer, H.S.Wright and J.G.Moffatt, ibid, 79, 430, (1957). c) G.Aksnes and K.Bergesen Acta Chem. Stand. 20, 2508, (1966). d) @.C.Ha and F.H.Westheimer, J.&. -Chem. Sot. a3,1102(m) e) I.Dostrovsky and M.Halmann, J. -Chem. Sot. SO?, 516,(1953) M, 1004, (1956). f) M.Halmann, M, 305, (1959). g) R.F.Hudson and L.Keay, ibid, 2463, (1956). 1859, 1865.(1960).
11
12 13 14
M.D.M.Gray and D.J.H.Smith, Tetrahedron -Lett. -9 21 859. (1980) Nguyen Thang Thuong et P.Chabrier. ---Bull. Sot. Chfm. Fr. 9-10, 2083, (1975)
15
C.R.Hall and T.D.Inch, -J. -Chem. -Sot. --I Perkin I -1 4 1104, (1979). K.S.Wadsworth, Jr; S.Larsen and H.L.Rorten 2. 9. 38 256, (1973). W.S.Wadsworth, Ibfd. -Chezn.-) s, 2921, (1973).
16
H.Mikolajczyk and #.Witczak, 2. _Chem. _. Sot
17
Perkin I -* 20 2213, (1977). -* a) R.L.Jarvest and G.Lowe, ---J. Chem. Sot. Comm. 364, (1979) b) J.Gagoaire, J.B.Robert, J.Verrier and R.Wolf, Bull. -Sot. Chim. 'r. l2, 3719, (1966).
18
a) D.Z.Denney, G.Y.Chen and D.B.Denney, J.Am. -Chem. Sot. 91, 6838, (1969). b) K.G.Newton and B.S.Campbell, ibid, 96, 7790, (1974). c) P.M.Cullis, R.L.Jarvest, G.Lowe and B.V.L.Porter, J. Chem. Sot. Chen. Comm. 245, (1981). -----
19 20
E.A.Dennis and F.H.Westheimer, --J. Am. Sot. a, 3432, (1966). S.L.Buchwald, D.H.Pliura and J.R.Knowles, J. ---Am. Chem. Sot. 106, 1916, (1984).
21
R.J.P.Corrlu and G.Lanneau, J. Organometal. Chem. 67, 243, (1974).
22
R.J.P.Corriu, B.J.L.Henner, J. Organometal. -Chem. -) 102 R.S.Edmunson, --Chem. and Ind. 1828, (1962).
23 24 25
407, (1975).
Hc.Combie, Saunders and Stacey. J. -Chem. Sot. 380, (1945). H.J.Lucas, F.W.Mitchell, Jr and C.N.Scully, J. &I. -. c.
72, 5491, (1950).