Joint Mobilization (Articulation, Nonthrust Technique; Nonimpulse Technique)

Joint Mobilization (Articulation, Nonthrust Technique; Nonimpulse Technique)

REFERENCES 1. Manheim CJ, Lavett DK: The myofascial release manual. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 1989. 2. Ramsey SM: Holistic manual therapy techniques. Pri...

137KB Sizes 2 Downloads 137 Views

REFERENCES 1. Manheim CJ, Lavett DK: The myofascial release manual. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 1989. 2. Ramsey SM: Holistic manual therapy techniques. Primary Care Clin Off Pract 24(4):759-786, 1997. 3. Barnes JF: Myofascial release: the search for excellence. A comprehensive evaluatory and treatment approach. John F. Barns PT and Rehabilitation Services; 1990. 4. Goodman CC: The cardiovascular system. In: Goodman CC, Boissonnault WG, Fuller KS, eds: Pathology: implications for the physical therapist, ed 2. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. 5. Manheim CJ: The myofascial release manual, ed 2. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 1994. 6. Brashear HR Jr, Raney RB Sr: Shand’s handbook of orthopaedic surgery, ed 9. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1978.

25

JOINT MOBILIZATION (ARTICULATION, NONTHRUST TECHNIQUE; NONIMPULSE TECHNIQUE) OVERVIEW. Joint mobilization (also called articulation, non-thrust) is a manual technique directed to the patient’s joint whereby the clinician imparts passive movements such as glides and distractions. The technique is characterized by lowvelocity movements (i.e., rather than high-velocity thrusts) and is generally slow enough for the patient to stop. The goal is to relieve pain or improve range of motion by improving joint play and restoring the roll and glide arthrokinematics of the joint.1 SUMMARY: CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS. Seven sources cited a total of 51 concerns for joint mobilization. Concerns ranged from four to 18 per source. All seven sources were physical therapists. The largest proportion of concerns were musculoskeletal (>40%). The most frequently cited concern was neoplasm followed by recent fracture and hypermobility. Part III • Interventions

285

286

Part III • Interventions

Several absolute CIs were also listed. Notes: Grieve,2 Kisner and Colby,1 and Sprague3 address spinal mobilization, peripheral joint mobilization, and the cervical spine concerns, respectively. Harris and Lundgren4 address pediatric concerns with nervous system disorders. ADVERSE EVENT. Michaeli,5 in a 1993 descriptive study, reported on a 75-year-old man who suffered a minor CVA with aphasia a day or two following an occipito-atlantal and atlantoaxial joint mobilization with a forceful rotatory component. No premanipulative screening was conducted.

Number of Concerns

20

Number of Concerns for Joint Mobilization per Source

Proportion of Concerns Based on ICD

Symptoms 15

Congenital Pregnancy

Procedural Injury Medical devices Infection Neoplasm 8% Mental

10

10% 42%

5 Musculoskeletal

Nervous

Top 7 Cited Concerns for Joint Mobilization (n = 7) Neoplasm Recent fracture Hypermobility Cauda equina lesion Bone disease

Circulatory Respiratory

Osteoporosis Rheumatoid arthritis 0

0

7 Physical Therapy Sources

1

2

3

4

5

6

Number of Citing Concerns

7

CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS A00B99 CERTAIN INFECTIONS AND PARASITIC DISEASES Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Infection

ACI ACI ACI CI

Hertling and Kessler, 19966,a Grieve, 19892,b Paris, 19797 Cookson, 19798

PT PT PT PT

Tuberculosis

Rationale/Comment

Bacterial infection can affect bone and soft tissue.

a, Bacterial concerns; b, Infective arthritic concerns.

C00C97 NEOPLASMS Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Rationale/Comment

Malignant tissue (previous)— non-spinal Neoplasm

Care

Grieve, 19892

PT

ACI ACI ACI CI CI Extreme care

Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Grieve, 19892,b Paris, 19797 Cookson, 19798 Sprague, 19833,a Kisner and Colby, 19961,c

PT PT PT PT PT PT

For spinal mobilization, if there is a previous history of a malignant tumor (non-spinal), one must “reasonably” exclude metastases to the spine. There may be undiscovered metastasis to bone.

a, Primary or secondary malignancy; b, Malignancy involving vertebral column; c, Extreme care if patient’s response and signs are favorable. Part III • Interventions

287

Part III • Interventions

288

F00F00 MENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS Issue

Developmental delay—generalized of unknown etiology (with hypotonia and ligamentous laxity) Neurosis—severe Psychologic pain

LOC

Source 4

Affil

Rationale/Comment

The patient may exhibit hypotonia and ligamentous laxity.

CI

Harris and Lundgren, 1991

PT

Caution CI

Cookson, 19798 Sprague 19833

PT PT

G00G99 DISEASES OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Rationale/Comment

Cauda equina lesions with bowel and bladder disturbance

ACI CI CI

Grieve, 19892 Cookson, 19798 Sprague, 19833,a

PT PT PT

Note: Cauda equina syndrome presents as flaccid paralysis of the lower limbs bilaterally, paralysis of the rectal and bladder sphincter, and anesthesis of the buttocks, perineum, and posterior legs and feet.9 Evaluate evidence of neural compression such as a positive Babinski, nonsegmental paresthesia, or spastic weakness resulting in spastic gait.8 Evaluate compression of 4th sacral root with signs of sexual impotence, impaired bowel and bladder, saddle area pain, and paraesthesia.8

Cerebral palsy—athetoid or ataxic

Strongly CI

Neurological signs Spasticity and older children with joint restrictions

Care Caution and conservative use

Spinal cord involvement of more than one spinal nerve root on one side or two adjacent roots in one limb only

ACI

Harris and Lundgren, 19914 Grieve, 19892 Harris and Lundgren, 19914

PT

Grieve, 19892

PT

PT PT

Neck movements (rapid, repetitive) in athetoid cerebral palsy can accelerate progression of cervical instability. See Manipulation. Reasons: First, immature growth plates are vulnerable to linear and torsional shears during growth spurts, which may be a particular issue with younger children. Second, children with CNS involvement may not adequately provide a history. Third, clinicians need the competence to differentiate capsular tightness from spasticity. Perform gentle oscillations and avoid techniques that cause pain or reactive muscle spasms. Avoid quick stretches to muscle surrounding joints in children with spasticity because of the concern for temporarily increasing spasticity.

a, Spinal cord compression.

Part III • Interventions

289

Part III • Interventions

290

I00I99 DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM Issue

LOC

Source 8

Affil

Rationale/Comment

If signs of circulatory disturbances are noted, consider the use of gentler techniques.8 Inquire about drop attack history, calcification of large blood vessels on x-ray; dizziness, visual disturbance related to neck posture, or vertebral artery disease of the cervical spine (i.e., vertebral artery occlusion; advanced arteriosclerosis).8 Also see Michaeli.5 Note: This maneuver is a component of the vertebral artery test, and dizziness may suggest circulatory embarrassment of the vertebral artery and a potential hazard for cervical techniques.

Circulatory disturbance

Caution

Cookson, 1979

PT

Dizziness aggravated by neck rotation or extension

Care

Grieve, 19892

PT

J00J99 DISEASES OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Issue

Upper respiratory tract infection

LOC

Avoid

Source

Paris, 1979

Affil 7

PT

Rationale/Comment

M00M99 DISEASES OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM AND CONNECTIVE TISSUE Issue

Arthroses Autoimmune disease— advanced Bone disease

Connective tissue— weakened Deformity—operative Disc—herniation

LOC

Source

Affil 6

RCI CI

Hertling and Kessler, 1996 Cookson, 19798

PT PT

ACI Caution Extreme caution Extreme caution

Grieve, 19892,a,b Cookson, 19798,b Kisner and Colby, 19961,c Kisner and Colby, 19961

PT PT PT PT

Caution RCI

Cookson, 19798 Paris, 19797

PT PT

Disc—prolapse

RCI

Disc—prolapse, with neurological changes Hypermobility

ACI

Paris, 19797

PT

RCI Caution Caution CI

Paris, 19797 Cookson, 19798,d Grieve, 19892 Kisner and Colby, 19961

PT PT PT PT

Rationale/ Comment

In advanced autoimmune disease (i.e., ankylosing spondylitis), ligaments may become lax and spinal joints hypermobile. Vigorous manual techniques are CI.

Forceful mobilization, in the presence of weak connective tissue, such as from disuse, injury, surgery, or medications (corticosteroids), may destroy tissue. Note: Disc herniation involves the partial expulsion of nuclear material from the annulus into the canal, with the majority of material remaining in the annulus.1 This concern is dependent on skill level. Note: A disc prolapse results when the nuclear material frankly ruptures into the vertebral canal.1 This is a disc prolapse with serious neurological changes, including cord compression. Patients with hypermobility may have capsular or ligamentous necrosis. Anterior and posterior glides are contraindicated for anterior and posterior shoulder dislocations, respectively, during the rehabilitation phase (i.e., following reduction).1 Continued Part III • Interventions

291

Part III • Interventions

Issue

Hypermobility in associated joints Internal derangement Joint effusion

LOC

Source 1

Affil

Rationale/Comment

These joints need to be stabilized so mobilization forces do not stress them.

Extreme caution

Kisner and Colby, 1996

PT

RCI RCI CI RCI CI Avoid

Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Kisner and Colby, 19961 Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Kisner and Colby, 19961 Paris, 19797

PT PT PT PT PT PT

ACI

Paris, 19797

PT

Osteoporosis

Care ACI Caution

Grieve, 19892 Paris, 19797,d Cookson, 19798

PT PT PT

Rheumatica, polymyalgia Rheumatoid arthritis

Care CI Care Extreme caution

Grieve, 19892 Cookson, 19798 Grieve, 19892 Kisner and Colby, 19961

PT PT PT PT

Joint inflammation Ligaments—laxity (generally) Osteomyelitis

292

Do not stretch with joint mobilization because the joint capsule is already distended from the swelling and is limited by pain rather than fiber shortening.1 Do not stretch with joint mobilization as it will only increase pain, guarding, and tissue damage.1 Note: Because a goal of joint mobilization is soft tissue stretching, using this technique on a lax joint is counterintuitive and may create further, unwanted instability. Osteomyelitis is characterized by inflammation of bone, usually due to bacterial infection, bone destruction, abscess formation, and reactive formation of new bone. Avoid any technique (e.g., such as massage) that may mechanically spread infection.9 Note: Osteoporosis (porous bone) is characterized by reduced bone mass, with susceptibility to fractures, particularly vertebral compression fractures that are not usually associated with severe trauma.9 Mobilize with care, especially over osteoporotic ribs.2 This condition is regarded as an inflammatory arthritis of axial and limb girdle joints. This is an advanced autoimmune disease. Connective tissue is weakened and forceful peripheral mobilization may rupture tissue and lead to instability.1 One source suggests gentle mobilization in RA, but patient must not be acutely inflamed, the cervical spine must be avoided, and depleted bone structure (especially rib) must be respected.2

Rheumatoid collagen necrosis—of the vertebral ligament Scoliosis Spondylolisthesis

Spondylolysis

ACI

Grieve, 19892

PT

RCI RCI Care

Paris, 19797 Paris, 19797 Grieve, 19892

PT PT PT

RCI

Paris, 19797

PT

The cervical spine is particularly vulnerable.

Note: Spondylolisthesis (listhesis means “slipping”) is a defect in the isthmus that results in vertebral instability with a forward slipping of the spinal column from its base, common at the LS level. The ligament stability is relied upon.9 Techniques involving a “degree of energy” are contraindicated for spondylolisthesis.2 Note: Spondylolysis may cause neurological signs if an osteophyte encroaches on the spinal canal or intravertebral foramina.1

a, More involved than “simple osteoporosis”; b, Of the spine; c, Concerns for the periphery; d, Active.

O00O99 PREGNANCY, CHILDBIRTH, AND PUERPERIUM Issue

First trimester of pregnancy Last stage of pregnancy

LOC

Avoid CI Avoid CI

Source 7

Paris, 1979 Cookson, 19798 Paris, 19797 Cookson, 19798

Affil

Rationale/Comment

PT

There is the danger of precipitating a miscarriage in the first trimester. Vigorous maneuvers are CI.7

PT PT

Ligament are lax during the last stage of pregnancy.7 Vigorous maneuvers are CI.

Part III • Interventions

293

Part III • Interventions

294

Q00Q99 CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS, DEFORMITIES AND CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES Issue

LOC

Deformity, congenital Down syndrome

Caution Strongly CI

Prader-Willi syndrome

Strongly CI

Source

Affil 8

Cookson, 1979 Harris and Lundgren, 19914

PT PT

Rationale/Comment

Twenty-three percent of individuals with Down syndrome have patella instability, 10% have hip subluxations or dislocations, and 15% have atlantoaxial instability. This syndrome presents with generalized hypotonia.

R00R99 SYMPTOMS, SIGNS, AND ABNORMAL CLINICAL AND LABORATORY FINDINGS NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED Issue

Elderly persons with weakened connective tissue and reduced circulation Debilitation—general Inflammation Pain, excessive a, Active inflammatory.

LOC

Source

Affil 1

Extreme caution

Kisner and Colby, 1996

PT

RCI Avoid ACI CI Extreme caution

Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Paris, 19797 Grieve, 19892,a Cookson, 19798 Kisner and Colby, 19961

PT PT PT PT PT

Rationale/Comment

E.g., poor general health.

Determine cause of pain.

S00T98 INJURY, POISONING, AND CERTAIN OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF EXTERNAL CAUSES Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Ligament, rupture Fracture—recent

ACI ACI ACI Caution CI Extreme caution

Paris, 19797 Hertling and Kessler, 19966 Paris, 19797,a Cookson, 19798 Sprague, 19833 Kisner and Colby, 19961,b

PT PT PT PT PT PT

Rationale/Comment

a, Fracture; b, Use of joint mobilization (peripheral) depends on site of fracture and stabilization.

Y70Y82 MEDICAL DEVICES Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Rationale/Comment

Total joint replacements

Extreme caution

Kisner and Colby, 19961

PT

The replacement mechanism is “self-limiting.”

Part III • Interventions

295

Part III • Interventions

296

PROCEDURAL CONCERN Issue

LOC

Source

Affil

Rationale/Comment

Spasms that protect a joint Temporary soreness after treatments

Advice Advice

Grieve, 19892

PT

Never push through spasms that are protecting a joint. Patient instructions may relieve unnecessary anxiety between sessions. Warn patients of temporary aftereffects of treatments (i.e., soreness; other “after-effects”).

ADVERSE EVENT Source

Background

Therapy

Outcome

Follow-up/ Interpretation

Michaeli, 19935 Mobility and complications Descriptive (questionnaire) Aust Physiother

A survey was sent to 250 physiotherapists who completed a postgraduate course in South Africa between 1971 and 1989.

153 surveys were returned (61% response rate) with 228,050 manipulative procedures reported between 1971 and 1989. A total of 29 patients receiving spinal (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) manipulations experienced 52 mostly minor complications (most were from cervical manipulations). Another 58 patients receiving cervical mobilization had 129 complications, including the following case: A 75-year-old man suffered a minor CVA with aphasia (residual deficit 2 years later) a day

Dizziness, severe headaches, and nausea were the most common side effects for both cervical manipulation and mobilization. Complications after cervical manipulation included dizziness, nausea, severe headaches, nystagmus, blurred vision, brachialgia (also with neurological deficits), loss of consciousness, and acute wry neck. All patients recovered without sequelae with an average recovery of 6.3 days. Complications after cervical mobilization included dizziness, severe headaches,

The authors conclude that spinal manipulation is relatively safe (by physiotherapists in South Africa). Therapists should be aware of the potential risks with cervical mobilization.

or two following successive treatments for neck pain. (The mobilization was a grade 4 unilateral PA pressure to the occipitoatlantal and atlantoaxial joints and a rotatory mobilization described by patient as a “strong twisting movement.” Note: Premanipulative procedures were not conducted and VBI symptoms were not reported by patient.)

nausea, brachialgia (also with neurological deficits), blurring vision, vomiting, nystagmus, increased pain >2 weeks, CVA, and skin clamminess. The majority had no sequelae. There was partial recovery noted in one person with a CVA and two patients with brachialgia with neurological deficits. No recovery was reported in another two patients with brachialgia with neurological deficits (loss of strength and reflexes).

REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Kisner C, Colby LA: Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques, ed 3. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1996. Grieve GP: Contra-indications to spinal manipulation and allied treatments. Physiotherapy 75(8):445-453, 1989. Sprague RB: The acute cervical joint lock. Phys Ther 63(9):1439-1444, 1983. Harris SR, Lundgren BD: Joint mobilization for children with central nervous system disorders: indications and precautions. Phys Ther 71(12):890-896, 1991. Michaeli A: Reported occurrence and nature of complications following manipulative physiotherapy in South Africa. Aust Physiother 39(4):309-315, 1993. Hertling D, Kessler RM: Introduction to manual therapy. In Hertling D, Kessler RM, eds: Management of common musculoskeletal disorders: Physical therapy principles and methods, ed 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. Paris SV: Mobilization of the spine. Phys Ther 59(8):988-985, 1979. Cookson JC: Orthopedic manual therapy: An overview. Phys Ther 59(3):259-267, 1979. Brashear HR Jr, Raney RB Sr: Shand’s handbook of orthopaedic surgery, ed 9. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1978. Part III • Interventions

297