Macroinvertebrates of the Capivari marine bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: Paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications

Macroinvertebrates of the Capivari marine bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: Paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications

Journal Pre-proof Mollusks and brachiopods of the Capivari marine bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: Paleoenvi...

12MB Sizes 0 Downloads 24 Views

Journal Pre-proof Mollusks and brachiopods of the Capivari marine bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: Paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications Marcello Guimarães Simões, Jacqueline Peixoto Neves, Arturo César Taboada, Maria Alejandra Pagani, Filipe Giovanini Varejão, Mário Luis Assine PII:

S0895-9811(19)30443-2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102433

Reference:

SAMES 102433

To appear in:

Journal of South American Earth Sciences

Received Date: 27 August 2019 Revised Date:

19 November 2019

Accepted Date: 20 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Simões, Marcello.Guimarã., Neves, J.P., Taboada, Arturo.Cé., Pagani, M.A., Varejão, F.G., Assine, Má.Luis., Mollusks and brachiopods of the Capivari marine bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: Paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications, Journal of South American Earth Sciences (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jsames.2019.102433. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1

Mollusks and brachiopods of the Capivari Marine Bed, late Paleozoic glacial

2

Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: paleoenvironmental and

3

paleogeographic implications

4 5

Marcello Guimarães Simões

6

Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Distrito de

7

Rubião Junior, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

8 9

Jacqueline Peixoto Neves*

10

Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, Paraná,

11

Brazil.

12

*Corresponding autor

13 14

Arturo César Taboada

15

Centro de Investigación Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónicas, CONICET-UNPSJB, Esquel

16

U9200, Chubut, Argentina.

17 18

Maria Alejandra Pagani

19

Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio – CONICET, Avenida Fontana nº 140, Trelew

20

U9100GYO, Chubut, Argentina.

21 22

Filipe Giovanini Varejão

23

Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Geologia Aplicada, Universidade

24

Estadual Paulista, Campus de Rio Claro, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

25



26 27

Mário Luis Assine

28

Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Geologia Aplicada, Universidade

29

Estadual Paulista, Campus de Rio Claro, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

30 31

1

32

Abstract.—A 2-m-thick silty shale bed within the Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

33

Basin, State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil, records marine sedimentation in a siliciclastic-

34

dominated, low-energy, shelf setting, during a short-lived deglacial event. The bed is located

35

100–150 m below the base of the lower Permian, post-glacial Tatui Formation. The marine

36

assemblage is dominated by rhynchonelliform brachiopods, with subordinate bivalves,

37

gastropods and crinoids, recording the highest phylum-level diversity so far identified within a

38

given fossil-bearing horizon in the uppermost portion of the Itararé Group. Two new species are

39

described, one brachiopod Biconvexiella saopauloensis and one gastropod Peruvispira

40

brasilensis. Additionally, shells of Lyonia rochacamposi, Rhynchopora grossopunctata,

41

Quinquenella rionegrensis, Phestia tepuelensis, Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis, Limipecten

42

capivariensis, Praeundulomya cf. subelongata and Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp.are identified.

43

Crinoid columns were assigned to øPentaridica sp. (a genus based on elements of the columnal).

44

This is the first systematic description of members of the Eurydesma-Lyonia fauna in the

45

northeastern part of the Paraná Basin, Brazil. The overwhelming majority of brachiopods belong

46

to Biconvexiella saopauloensis, followed by Rhynchopora grossopunctata. The record of Lyonia

47

rochacamposi closely resembles that of the uppermost part of the Taciba Formation in southern

48

Brazil. Hence, the Capivari marine fauna correlates approximately with that of the upper part of

49

the Taciba Formation. Lyonia rochacamposi also indicates correlation with Permian units of the

50

Sauce Grande-Colorado (Argentina), Huab (Hardap shale of the Dwyka Group), Aranos area

51

(Namibia), southwest Africa, and the Carnavon (Western Australia) basins. These correlations

52

support a latest Asselian-earliest Sakmarian age for the fauna.

53

2

54

Highlights

55

A marine cool-water benthic fauna developed during Late Paleozoic Ice Age is described;

56

Fauna developed during a transgression coupled with a time of climatic amelioration;

57

Assemblage flourisched under restrict paleogeograhic conditions.

58 59

Keywords: Permian, Taciba Formation, macroinvertebrate, Paraná Basin, Capivari.

60 61

1. Introduction

62

Glaciogenic rocks of the Carboniferous-Permian Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, Brazil, are known

63

since Derby (1878) and White (1908). The succession includes one of the most complete

64

sedimentary records of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age (LPIA, sensu Shi and Waterhouse, 2010) that

65

waxed and waned across the central Gondwana (Rocha-Campos, 1967; França and Potter, 1988;

66

Holz et al., 2010). However, due to the large size of the basin (>1,500,000 km2) and the complex

67

depositional processes associated with the glacial and post-glacial events, no consensus exists

68

about the correlation, age and extent of the Itararé Group (Loczy, 1964; Rocha-Campos, 1967;

69

1970; Saad, 1977; Rocha-Campos and Rösler, 1978; França and Potter, 1991; Castro, 1999; Holz

70

et al., 2010).

71

Within the glaciomarine successions of the Itararé Group, as shown by Santos et al. (1996),

72

the sea-level rise following ice retreats was often accompanied by widespread marine deposits,

73

usually ice-rafted, debris-free, dark-gray, fossil-poor shales. Five regionally continuous

74

stratigraphic intervals with marine beds are recognized (Saad, 1977; Rocha-Campos and Rösler,

75

1978; Petri and Souza, 1993; Santos et al., 1996; Holz et al., 2010), which are known by their

76

local geographic names, as follows: (1) Araçoiaba, (2) Mafra-Ortigueira, (3) Lontras-Guaraúna

77

(upper Pennsylvanian), (4) Capivari, and (5) Passinho (Rocha-Campos and Rösler, 1978; Santos

78

et al., 1996), whose stratigraphic position within the glacial succession varies according to 3

79

distinct authors (Tables 1, 2). These marine beds record extensive transgressive events associated

80

with regional episodes of glacier retreats (see Loczy, 1964, p. 37; França and Potter, 1988;

81

Castro, 1999; Vesely and Assine, 2006; Mineropar, 2007; Neves et al., 2014a, b; Taboada et al.,

82

2016). Hence, some of these deposits (i.e., Lontras and Passinho shales) may have represented

83

the maximum flooding surfaces within the depositional sequence (Vesely and Assine, 2006;

84

Holz et al., 2008; 2010). Yet, within these marine beds at least eight distinct marine benthic

85

assemblages are known (Rocha-Campos and Rösler, 1978; Neves et al., 2014a, b; Taboada et al.,

86

2016).

87

As shown in Table 2, at the outcrop belt of the eastern border of the Paraná Basin, fossil-

88

rich marine intercalations of the Itararé Group are difficult to correlate regionally (Holz et al.,

89

2010). This is the case for the fossil-bearing beds of the Taciba Formation (former Capivari

90

Formation, Table 3) exposed in the central-eastern region of the State of São Paulo, southeastern

91

Brazil (Figs. 1 and 2). Some authors have correlated these fossil-rich marine beds with the

92

Lontras shale (Soares, 1991; Castro, 1999) at the top of the Campo Mourão Formation (França

93

and Potter, 1991). On the other hand, Loczy (1964) and Rocha-Campos (1969) correlated the

94

Capivari fossil beds with the marine assemblages of the Teixeira Soares marine beds (Passinho

95

shale and associated rocks), uppermost part of the Itararé Group, State of Paraná, southern Brazil.

96

Alternatively, Taboada et al. (2016) positioned the Capivari fossil-rich beds in between the

97

Lontras and Passinho fossil-bearing shales of the southern Brazil (Figs. 1, 2).

98

The precise taxonomic composition, and age of the fossil-bearing beds of the Capivari

99

region (see Fig. 2) can shed light on intrabasinal biocorrelation of the Late Paleozoic marine

100

invertebrates faunas of the Paraná Basin with stratigraphic and paleogeographic implications for

101

the depositional history of the glacial succession of the Itararé Group. Therefore, in this

102

contribution we will attempt to better constrain those fossil-bearing beds. To achieve this, we

4

103

reassessed the invertebrate fauna originally described by Mendes (1952), also complementing

104

our analysis with new fossil findings.

105 106

1.1. Stratigraphic framework

107

During the Paleozoic, the intraplate Paraná Basin was a large depositional area in the SW

108

Gondwanaland (central/southeastern part of the South America) (Milani, 1997). The basin was

109

elongated in the N-S direction and filled with Late Ordovician to Late Cretaceous sedimentary

110

rocks, encompassing six supersequences or unconformity-bounded units (Milani, 1997). The

111

2,500-m-thick succession of upper Paleozoic to Mesozoic rocks is referred as the Gondwana I

112

Supersequence (Milani, 1997; Milani et al., 2007) that was generated in a variety of continental,

113

transitional and marine sedimentary settings, including upper Carboniferous-Permian glacial to

114

Triassic arid depositional environments.

115

Rocks of the glacial succession are included in the Itararé Group (eastern border), which is

116

one of the most complete stratigraphic successions of the LPIA in southwestern Gondwana.

117

Resting either directly upon Precambrian basement, lower Paleozoic or on Devonian beds, the

118

Itararé Group is the thickest sedimentary package of the Paraná Basin, sedimentation lasting for

119

at least 36 million years (França and Potter, 1991). Conglomerates, diamictites, sandstones,

120

mudstones, rhythmites, turbidites, and thin coal beds are the main lithotypes of the group

121

(Rocha-Campos, 1967; França and Potter, 1991; Holz et al., 2010). The precise age of the rocks

122

of the Itararé Group is one of the main issues of the Gondwana geology in Brazil. The Itararé

123

Group is usually referred as upper Mississippian-lower Cisuralian in age (Souza and Marques-

124

Toigo, 2005; Guerra-Sommer et al., 2008a, b; Rocha-Campos et al., 2008; Holz et al., 2010;

125

Neves et al., 2014b; Taboada et al., 2016). However, U–Pb radiometric ages have dated the

126

topmost glacial deposits of the Itararé Group at 307.7 ± 3.1 Ma (Kasimovian−Moscovian,

127

Pennsylvanian, late Carboniferous) and the base of the overlying post-glacial deposits of the 5

128

coal-bearing Rio Bonito Formation at 298.8 ± 1.9 Ma (Ghzelian−Asselian, Carboniferous–

129

Permian boundary) (Cagliari et al., 2014; 2016). Indeed, a radiometric Carboniferous age for the

130

upper Itararé Group was reinforced by newely U–Pb laser ablation ICP-MS detrital zircon dates

131

of rocks of this unit (Tedesco et al., 2019). However, we are following the chronostratigraphic

132

chart of Holz et al. (2010), which present the most complete information of age for the entire

133

Itararé Group (Fig. 1).

134

Since the seminal work by Barbosa and Almeida (1949a), various lithostratigraphic

135

subdivisions for the Itararé Group appeared in the literature. In southeastern Brazil, the group

136

was subdivided into several formations, which include, in ascending order, the Itu, Capivari,

137

Gramadinho, Tietê and Itapetininga formations (Barbosa and Almeida, 1949a). However, the

138

original designations of these authors are now in disuse. Schneider et al. (1974) proposed an

139

alternate litostratigraphic framework for outcrops in southern Brazil, in which the Itararé

140

comprises three main units, including from the base to top, the Campo do Tenente, Mafra, and

141

Rio do Sul formations.

142

Based on a detailed subsurface analysis, França and Potter (1991) recognized three fining-

143

upward glacially-influenced sedimentary cycles and classified them as formations named, from

144

base to top, as Lagoa Azul, Campo Mourão and Taciba. These authors also noted that in the

145

subsurface the maximum thickness (~1300 m) of the Itararé Group is reached in the State of São

146

Paulo, where our study area is located (Fig. 1).

147

Trying to correlate the glacial cycles defined by França and Potter (1991) in outcrop area

148

of the Itararé Group, Vesely and Assine (2006) recognized five glacially-influenced depositional

149

sequences in the State of Paraná. These are also laterally traceable for nearly 400 km in well logs

150

across the central portion of the basin. The oldest depositional sequence was correlated with the

151

Lagoa Azul Formation of França and Potter (1991), the youngest with the Taciba Formation, and

152

the three middle sequences with the whole Campo Mourão Formation. A retrogradational 6

153

stratigraphic stacking pattern characterizes all these cycles, which correspond to major ice-retreat

154

phases or deglaciation sequences (Vesely and Assine, 2006). Complex facies associations are

155

generated during deglaciation, mainly because tillites and outwash facies formed during an

156

oscillatory but overall glacier-retreat and are interfingered with contemporaneous glacial-marine

157

deposits.

158

In the outcrops of the studied area, the Taciba Formation is equivalent to the Capivari

159

Formation (mainly fine-grained facies) and the overlying Gramadinho Formation (mainly

160

diamictites) of Barbosa and Almeida (1949a, b). Yet, the Taciba Formation is the youngest and

161

most widespread unit of the Itararé Group, corresponding to the Rio do Sul Formation of

162

Schneider et al. (1974). Finally, as commented above, the Taciba Formation is the sedimentary

163

record of the last deglacial sequence (sequence 5 of Vesely and Assine, 2006), representing the

164

final ice-retreat in the basin, onlapping the south border of the basin.

165

Based on subsurface data from three boreholes (C-IG/93, R-IG/94 and R-IG/95) drilled in

166

the Capivari and Rafard counties, Petri et al. (1996) subdivided the upper part of the Itararé

167

Group into four main sedimentary packages, as follows (from the base to the top): (a) package D,

168

represented by conglomerates and coarse sandstones; (b) package C that includes mudstones,

169

siltstones and rhythmites; (c) package B, which is dominated by sandstones, and (d) package A,

170

represented by transgressive mudstones. This succession is, in general, similar to that recorded

171

by Saad (1977) to the Itararé Group in the south and central portions of the State of São Paulo.

172 173

1.2. Background: the Capivari fossil bed unearthed

174

The marine macroinvertebrate assemblage herein described comes from a ~2-m-thick interval of

175

silty shales recorded in the middle part of the Taciba Formation, upper part of the Itararé Group

176

in the State of São Paulo, formerly refered to the Capivari Formation (Figs. 1 and 2).

177

Theassemblage is thought to be the most diverse one of the Itararé Group (Rocha-Campos and 7

178

Rösler, 1978; Simões et al., 1998), and is 500 km far away of those invertebrate-rich beds of the

179

Taciba Formation (Passinho Shale) from southern Brazil (Neves et al., 2014b; Taboada et al.,

180

2016) (Fig. 2). As described and commented below, the fossil-bearing silty shale bed crops out

181

in the vicinity of the Capivari county (Fig. 2). Fossils from these localities were first discovered

182

in 1947 by F.F.M. Almeida, S. Petri and O. Barbosa (see information in Mendes, 1952), but the

183

first publication on these fossil-bearing sites appeared in the literature only two years later

184

(Barbosa and Almeida 1949a). It was only in March of 1949, in a short note to the Brazilian

185

Academy of Sciences, that Barbosa and Almeida (1949a) briefly discussed the stratigraphic

186

position of the Capivari marine fauna within the Itararé Group. In August of that year, a more

187

comprehensive and detailed study of the geology and stratigraphy of the area was published. By

188

combining both subsurface and surface data, Barbosa and Almeida (1949b) constrained the

189

marine assemblage to the Capivari Formation and noted that the fossil bed is intercalated

190

between rhythmites and diamictites. The authors recorded the presence of brachiopods

191

(Ambocoelia, Rhynchopora), bivalves (Aviculopecten), and gastropods (that were subsequently

192

lost, see Rocha-Campos, 1966, p. 10), but the fossils were neither described, nor illustrated.

193

Despite this, Barbosa and Almeida (1949b) noted that the fossils are not identical to those

194

already described from the fossil-rich beds of the Itararé Group (i.e., Passinho shale and coeval

195

strata of the Teixeira Soares region, State of Paraná) from the State of Paraná, southern Brazil.

196

J.C. Mendes formally described the marine macroinvertebrate fossils of the “Capivari beds”

197

in 1952, basing on those specimens previously collected by Barbosa and Almeida (1949a, b),

198

plus additional material offered by the geologist S. Mezzalira. He reported the presence of

199

rhynchonelliform brachiopods (Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa, Rhynchopora grossopunctata)

200

and bivalves (Aviculopecten capivariensis n. sp., Nuculana? sp., and undetermined specimens)

201

(Mendes, 1952). Subsequently, Rocha-Campos (1966) recorded the presence of the gastropod

202

Peruvispira delicata. 8

203

After the contributions above, the marine fauna of the Capivari beds was almost forgotten

204

for over twenty years, mainly because the outcrops of the Itararé Group in the region are deeply

205

weathered (see also Mendes, 1952) and/or covered by dense commercial plantations (e.g., sugar

206

cane). During this period, data about the Capivari marine fauna appeared only in review papers,

207

as those by Rocha-Campos and Röser (1978) and Petri and Souza (1993). In both contributions,

208

the stratigraphic position and biocorrelation of the Capivari marine invertebrate fauna with those

209

of the southern parts of Brazil were tentatively constrained and discussed. In this context, a

210

probable northward extension of those beds was mentioned by Rocha-Campos and Rösler (1978,

211

p. 5). Indeed, these authors reported the presence of similar fossil-bearing rocks near the city of

212

Hortolândia, State of São Paulo, including the following bivalve genera: Phestia, Nuculopsis,

213

and Edmondia, plus undetermined pholadomyid shells.

214

In the mid-1990s, faculty of the Institute of Geosciences, University of São Paulo

215

(IGc/USP) carried out various field trips to the area originally mapped by Barbosa and Almeida

216

(1949b), “rediscovering” the fossil-bearing beds of Capivari (A.C. Rocha-Campos personal

217

communication, 1996). Consequently, new sampling efforts were carried-out, significantly

218

contributing to the find of new specimens. This enlarged substantially the original fossil

219

collection made by Barbosa and Almeida (1949a, b) and Mendes (1952). Unfortunately, at the

220

end of the 1990s, the original exposure of the Capivari outcrop was almost destroyed (Anelli et

221

al., 2000, p. 151) during the road works to enlarge the original path of the old, unpaved route

222

between the cities of Capivari and Salto (see Fig. 2). Despite that, renewed interest on those

223

fossils reappeared during the extensive study of the coeval late Paleozoic marine invertebrate

224

faunas of the Itararé Group from southern Brazil (Simões et al., 2012; Neves et al., 2014b;

225

Taboada et al., 2016). These studies better constrained the stratigraphic position, age and

226

biocorrelation of the marine assemblages of the Taciba Formation, upper part of the Itararé

9

227

Group, with other well-dated Gondwanan faunas (Simões et al., 2012; Neves et al., 2014b;

228

Taboada et al., 2016).

229

Based on the literature (e.g. Vesely and Assine, 2006) and personal communications from

230

various paleontologists and stratigraphers (A.C. Rocha-Campos, S. Petri), we relocated what was

231

left of the fossil-bearing beds in the Capivari-Salto road. At the same time, significant efforts

232

were made to gather the original material collected by previous authors, such as O. Barbosa,

233

F.F.M. Almeida, S. Petri, J.C. Mendes, and A.C. Rocha-Campos. Hence, in this contribution we

234

describe the fossil-bearing sedimentary succession of the Itararé Group near Capivari, and revise

235

the marine assemblage based on new material as well as the original fossils studied by previous

236

authors.

237 238

2. Material and methods

239

In total, 150 specimens of macroinvertebrates of the Capivari marine beds were examined, as

240

follows: 115 brachiopods, seven bivalves, three gastropods, and 25 crinoid fragments (Table 4).

241

All analyzed specimens (Tables 5-7) come from the classical outcrop located at ~6 km south of

242

the Capivari, on the old road between the Capivari and Salto towns (Figs. 2, 3).

243

In the laboratory, the fossil material was prepared according to standard paleontological

244

procedures (see Feldmann et al., 1989) using precision tools. Latex casts and plasticine molds

245

were also prepared for most of the specimens. Shells were coated with magnesium oxide

246

sublimate to enhance diagnostic morphological characters for photography (see Neves et al.,

247

2014a, b, and references therein). The ecological guilds (i.e., inferred invertebrate lifestyles)

248

were determined based on Aberhan and Kiessling (2015, p. 2).

249 250

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

10

251

All studied specimens are housed in the Institute de Geosciences, University of São Paulo, São

252

Paulo city, State of São Paulo. The following abbreviations are used in the text for institutional

253

acronyms: GP-1T, this prefix is reserved for type specimens belonging to the Invertebrate

254

Collection deposited in the Geosciences Institute, São Paulo University, Brazil; GP-1E, this

255

prefix is used for the invertebrate specimens that are housed in the non-type collection of that

256

institution; DGM, this prefix indicates that the specimens belong to the fossil collection of the

257

Geology and Mineralogy Division, Nacional Department of Mineral Production, State of Rio de

258

Janeiro, Brazil; IGG, this prefix is used for the material reposited in the Geographical and

259

Geological Institute of the State of São Paulo, now Geological Institute, Secretariat of the

260

Environment, São Paulo State, Brazil; CP.I, this prefix refers to the CENPALEO fossil

261

collection, Contestado University, Mafra, State of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil.

262 263

3. Systematic paleontology

264

The applied classification for Brachiopoda largely follows Waterhouse (2013) for Suborder

265

Linproductidina, Savage et al. (2002) for Order Rhynchonellida, Carter et al. (2006) for

266

Suborder Spiriferidina, Racheboeuf (2000) for Suborder Chonetidina. Taxonomic analysis of

267

Bivalvia follows Waterhouse, (2008, 2010), Bieler et al. (2010), Carter et al. (2011) for

268

suprageneric categories, and Dickins (1957; 1963), Morris et al. (1991), Newell and Boyd (1995)

269

and Neves et al. (2014b) at the generic and species level. Finally, the name of crinoid columnals

270

and pluricolumnals are preceded by the prefix ‘‘ø’’, as suggested by Le Menn (1987, 1988) and

271

Scheffler et al. (2015).

272 273

Class Strophomenata Williams et al., 1996

274

Order Productida Sarytcheva and Sokolskaja, 1959

275

Suborder Linoproductidina Waterhouse, 2013 11

276

Superfamily Proboscidelloidea Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

277

Family Auriculispinidae Waterhouse, 1986

278

Subfamily Lyoniinae Waterhouse, 2001

279

Tribe Lyoniini Waterhouse, 2001

280 281

Genus Lyonia Archbold, 1983

282 283

Type species: Linoproductus (Cancrinella) cancriniformis var. lyoni Prendergast 1943, from the

284

Lyons Group (lower Permian), Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia.

285 286

Remarks: A set of finely ribbed, spinose linoproductids such as Cancrinella Fredericks, 1928,

287

Auriculispina Waterhouse,1975, Costatumulus Waterhouse, 1983a, and Magniplicatina

288

Waterhouse, 1983b are externally closely similar to Lyona. Nevertheless, when compared to

289

Lyonia, Cancrinella possesses a more inflated shell, smaller size, crowded spines on the ears and

290

abundant spines on the dorsal valve (see discussion of this last character in Grigorjeva et al.,

291

1977; Waterhouse, 1982a; Shen et al., 2000; Li et al., 2012). Auriculispina is distinguished from

292

Lyonia by the presence of two or three rows of spines on the ears, stronger rugae on both valves,

293

more weakly swollen ventral spine ridges and a lack of dorsal spines (Waterhouse, 1975;

294

Archbold, 1983). Likewise, Costatumulus could be confused to Lyonia but the former has a more

295

inflated concave-convex profile, a lack of dorsal spines and possesses double rows of spines on

296

the ears (Waterhouse, 1983a, 1986). Magniplicatina also has ventral spines in one ou more hinge

297

rows and lacks dorsal spines but exhibits strongly developed concentric wrinkles or rugae as well

298

as coarser ventral spines on elongate spine ridges (Waterhouse, 1983b; Li et al., 2012), unlike

299

Lyonia. Closest genera to Lyonia such as Nambucalinus Waterhouse, 2001 and Bandoproductus

300

Jin and Sun, 1981, were discussed in a previously published paper (Taboada et al., 2016). 12

301 302

Lyonia rochacamposi Taboada et al., 2016

303

Figure 4.29–4.32

304 305

1969 Cancrinella sp.; Rocha-Campos, p. 105, pl. X, figs. 1-5, 8.

306

1969 Linoproductus sp.; Rocha-Campos, p. 106, pl. X, figs. 6-7.

307

2016 Lyonia rochacamposi; Taboada et al., p. 443, figs. A-O.

308 309

Holotype: CP.I 769I, CENPALEO (Universidade do Contestado), from the Taciba Formation,

310

Itararé Group, southern Paraná Basin, Brazil.

311 312

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

313

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

314 315

Description: Lyonia with transverse outline and moderately convex ventral valve. Ventral valve

316

maximum width close to hinge line, up to 30 mm wide, 24 mm long, and width/length ratio 1.25.

317

Ventral valve with large flattened ears (partially broken) and ornamentation of fine radial

318

costellae (8-9 per 5 mm on the venter); weak rugae on venter slightly stronger on ears. Costellae

319

number increasing by splitting into two ribs anteriorly from slightly swollen minute spine bases

320

in roughly quincuncial arrangement. A single row of spines, coarser than those on the venter

321

appears to be on hinge line, although this character is not well preserved.

322 323

Materials: Two fragmentary specimens, one external mold of dorsal valve, GP/1E 4350a; one

324

ventral valve, GP/1E 4350b.

325 13

326

Measurements: See Table 5 for Lyonia rochacamposi shell measurements.

327 328

Remarks: The studied specimens are scarce and limited to fragmentary remains of ventral

329

valves but exhibit comparable size, moderate convex profile, transverse outline, large flattened

330

ears, single row of hinge spines, distinct fine costellae and ventral spines quincunxial

331

arrangement that suggest its assignment to Lyonia rochacamposi Taboada et al., 2016. This

332

species was recently described from the post-glacial section of the Taciba Formation in the

333

Brazilian Santa Catarina State. The Capivari’s L. rochacamposi specimens, as well as those

334

from the southern Taciba Formation, are distinguished from L. lyoni from Lyons Group of

335

Western Australia mainly by their more transverse outline and finer costellation.

336

Cancrinelloides monticulus Waterhouse, 1982b, from the Asselian Pucket Group of south

337

Thailand was considered moderately close to Lyonia lyoni, but the Australian species is smaller,

338

with more emphasized concentric ornament, finer radial ornament, and slightly shorter spine

339

bases (Waterhouse, 1982b). Likewise, Lyonia rochacamposi is distinguished from the Thailand

340

species by its more transverse outline, finer costellation and presence of dorsal spines anteriorly.

341

Cancrinelloides monticulus was assigned latter to Bandoproductus (although with subgeneric

342

hierarchy) by Waterhouse (1982b) and shortly after to the same genus by Archbold (1983).

343 344

Order Rhynchonellida Kuhn, 1949

345

Superfamily Rhynchoporoidea Muir-Wood, 1955

346

Family Rhynchoporidae Muir-Wood, 1955

347

Subfamily Rhynchophoriinae Muir-Wood, 1955

348 349

Genus Rhynchopora King, 1865

350 14

351

Type species: Terebratula geinitziana de Verneuil, 1845, from the upper Permian (Kazanian) of

352

Arkhangelsk Region, Russia.

353 354

Rhynchopora grossopunctata Mendes, 1952

355

Figure 4.1–4.15

356 357

1952 Rhynchopora grossopunctata; Mendes, p. 12, figs. 4-7.

358

1966 Rhynchopora grossopunctata; Mendes, Mezzalira, pl. 2, figs. 3-4 (copy Mendes, 1952,

359

figs. 4-5).

360

1967, Rhynchopora grossopunctata; Mendes, Rocha-Campos, pl. 31, figs. 1-3 (copy Mendes,

361

1952 figs. 4-5, 7).

362

1989 Rhynchopora grossopunctata; Mendes, Mezzalira, pl. 2, figs. 3-4 (copy Mendes, 1952, figs.

363

4-5).

364 365

Holotype: Mendes (1952) did not choose a holotype but illustrated the syntype series of

366

Rhynchopora grossopunctata with three specimens labeled DGM 4189-4190 and IGG 518-I,

367

respectively. The IGG repository (Instituto Geográfico e Geológico do Estado de São Paulo) is

368

no longer available, while the specimens under the DGM acronym (Divisão de Geologia e

369

Mineralogia, Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral, Estado de Rio de Janeiro) were

370

transferred to the fossil collection of the Instituto de Geociências da Universidade de São Paulo,

371

although they are currently lost. An external mold of conjugated valves, labeled GP/1E-4342,

372

housed in the Instituto de Geociências da Universidade de São Paulo, is here selected as neotype

373

of R. grossopunctata Mendes.

374

15

375

Diagnosis: Large, subpentagonal in outline with maximum width mid-length. Five costae on

376

sulcus and fold, eight to nine on lateral flanks. Interspaces anteriorly develop coarse projections

377

extending as short tongues. Five punctae per mm2. Dental plates diverge 30º, up to one fourth of

378

valve length; dorsal interior with a thin median septum one third of valve length.

379 380

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

381

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

382 383

Description: Large-sized Rhynchopora, subpentagonal in outline with maximum width up to 18

384

mm at mid-length and length up 16 mm, with an average W/L ratio of 1.15. Ventral valve gently

385

convex with maximum convexity at umbo and dorsal valve more inflated with slightly raised

386

fold and maximum convexity at two thirds of valve length. Umbonal angle of 95º-100º; cardinal

387

extremities rounded. Sulcus very shallow, barely noticeable anteriorly from first third of valve

388

length and widening anteriorly (~40º) up to one fourth of maximum width. Five costae on sulcus

389

and fold, and 8-9 on lateral flanks, with finer costae developed postero-laterally. Costae wider at

390

commissure. Interspaces anteriorly develop long coarse projections extending as short tongues.

391

Five punctae per mm2. Dental plates diverge 30º, up to one fourth of valve length; dorsal interior

392

with a distinct thin median septum extending one third of valve length. Others features unknown.

393 394

Materials: One external mold of conjugated valves is the neotype, GP/1E-4342. Twenty

395

topotypic specimens. Two ventral valve external molds, GP/1E-443a, 443b; two ventral valve

396

internal molds GP/1E-2507, 2545; three dorsal valve external molds, GP/1E-451, 1915, 4405;

397

three dorsal valve internal molds, GP/1E-1912, 2492, 4325. Other fragmentary specimens,

398

GP/1E-445b, 446-447, 460, 1913, 2502, 2524, 2536, 4339.

399 16

400

Measurements: See Table 5 for Rhynchopora grossopunctata shell measurements.

401 402

Remarks: Although not preserved in the material here described, a spondylium is clearly present

403

in the syntype series of R. grossopunctata (Mendes, 1952). Species of Rhynchopora reported

404

from South America include Kozlowski (1914) R. nikitini (not Tschernyschew, see Cooper and

405

Grant, 1976) from the Copacabana Formation (Early Permian) of Bolivia (later synonymysed

406

under R. aff. illinoisensis [Worthen] by Chronic in Newell et al., 1953), and R. amotapensis

407

Chronic (in Newell et al., 1953), the latter two from the Tarma Group (Late Carboniferous) of

408

Peru. The last species shares a slightly transverse subpentagonal outline with R. grossopunctata,

409

as well as shallow sulcus and flatten fold with a similar number of costae, but the Brazilian

410

species is larger and exhibits more costae on the lateral flanks. R. aff. illinoisensis is smaller and

411

possesses more costae on sulcus, fold and lateral flanks when compared to R. grossopunctata.

412

Another South American species is Rhynchopora sp. from the Río del Peñón Formation

413

(Moscovian) of central-western Argentina (Cisterna and Simanauskas, 2000). It differs from R.

414

grossopunctata by having a smaller size, rounded subtriangular outline, deeper sulcus, fewer

415

costae on flanks and longer dorsal median septum. Rhynchopora australassica Archbold, 1995

416

(see also Archbold and Hogeboom, 2000), from the Lyons Group (Early Permian) of Western

417

Australia, has a larger size, subtriangular outline, fewer costae on flanks, deeper sulcus and a

418

more raised fold when compared to R. grossopunctata. Rhynchopora culta Waterhouse, 1982b,

419

from south Thailand and western Peninsular Malaysia (Shi and Waterhouse, 1991) is comparable

420

to R. grossopunctata, although the former has a subtrigonal shell shape, reduced number of

421

costae on flanks and almost double the number of punctae per millimeter.

422 423

Order Spiriferida Waagen, 1883

424

Superfamily Ambocoeloioidea George, 1931 17

425

Family Ambocoeliidae George, 1931

426

Subfamily Ambocoeliinae George, 1931

427

Genus Biconvexiella Waterhouse, 1983a

428 429

Type species: Attenuatella convexa Armstrong, 1968 from the Tiverton Formation, (Early

430

Permian), Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia.

431 432

Remarks: Biconvenxiella shares with Attenuatella Stehli, 1954 and Crurithyris George, 1931,

433

comparable shell shape and a similar external spinose microornamentation. Biconvexiella

434

possesses a subcircular shell outline, slightly incurved umbo, slightly concave to gently convex

435

dorsal valve and two pairs of adductor scars, the posterior pair scars being smaller than anterior

436

pair (Shi and Waterhouse, 1996; He et al., 2007). Attenuatella is distinguished from

437

Biconvenxiella by the presence in the former of an attenuated outline, a stronger convex ventral

438

valve and strongly incurved umbo, as well as a different arrangement and proportions of muscle

439

scars (Stehli, 1954; Waterhouse, 1964; Landis and Waterhouse, 1966; Shi and Waterhouse, 1996:

440

He et al., 2007, 2012). Crurithyris is characterized by a subrounded to transversely ovate shell

441

outline, a moderately to strongly incurved ventral umbo, a pair of centrally depressed ventral

442

adductor scars bisected by a thin ridge (may be absent), a pair of laterally depressed diductor

443

scars, which are separated from their adjacent adductor scars by ridges, and a pair of dorsal

444

adductor scars bisected by a median ridge (George, 1931; Stehli, 1954; He et al., 2007, 2012).

445 446

Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp.

447

Figure 4.16–4.25

448 449

1952 Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa (Shumard); Mendes, p. 10-11, pl. I, figs. 1-3. 18

450 451 452 453

1966 Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa (Shumard); Mezzalira, pl. 2, figs. 1-2 (copy Mendes, 1952 pl. I, figs. 1-2). 1967 Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa (Shumard); Rocha-Campos, pl. XXXI, figs. 4-5 (copy Mendes, 1952, pl. I, figs. 2-3).

454

1969 Attenuatela paulistana; Rocha-Campos, p. 108-112, text-fig. 12, pl. XI, figs. 1-14.

455

1989 Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa (Shumard); Mezzalira, pl. II, figs. 1-2 (copy Mendes,

456 457

1952 pl. I, figs. 1-2). 2016 Biconvexiella spp.; Taboada et al., pl. 4, fig. J.

458 459

Holotype: GP/1E 4339; Paratypes: GP/1E 450, 453, 2495, 2513, 2520, 2534, 4322, 4327, 4328,

460

4356c, all from the Taciba Formation, Paraná Basin, State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil.

461 462

Diagnosis: Average-sized Biconvexiella of biconvex profile with slightly convex dorsal valve

463

and strongly convex ventral valve, and subcircular outline. Ventral valve subequidimensional;

464

dorsal valve variably transverse; hinge line shorter than maximum width. Ventral median sinus

465

shallow and narrow. Dorsal valve convex with a narrow slightly raised fold.

466 467

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

468

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

469 470

Description: Average-sized Biconvexiella of biconvex profile and subcircular outline. Ventral

471

valve subequidimensional; dorsal valve variably transverse; hinge line shorter than maximum

472

width; which is located at valve midlength. Maximum width up to 14 mm, maximum length up

473

to 11.5 mm with a dorsal W/L ratio varying between 1.23-1.43 and W/L average of 1.33. Ventral

474

valve strongly convex with its stronger convexity in the umbonal region. Ventral median sinus 19

475

shallow and narrow. Dorsal valve slightly convex with a narrow fold not always developed.

476

Ornamentation of fine concentric growth lines sometimes lamellose and subconcentric rows of

477

minute subcircular spine bases (9-10/mm at valve mid lenght). Interior of ventral valve with long

478

(3/4 ventral valve length), narrow median adductor ridge bounded by two narrow elongate

479

depressed adductor scars and slightly rised semielliptical diductor scars. Interior of dorsal valve

480

(holotype) with small subelliptical (0.3 mm width, 1 mm length) depressed posterior adductor

481

scars separated by a short thin median ridge. Anterior adductor scars barely impressed, elongate

482

(2 mm length) tongue-shaped (1 mm of maximum width anteriorly) with inner side curved.

483

Crural plates short, divergent (30º-50º); dental sockets deep; cardinal process tuberculate.

484 485

Etymology: From the State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil.

486 487

Materials: Eighty-six specimens. Three external molds of conjugated valves: GP/1E 2495, 2513,

488

4328; two exterior of dorsal valves: GP/1E 2534, 4327; five dorsal valve external molds: GP/1E

489

448, 449, 2413, 4323a, 4354d1; fifteen ventral valve external molds; GP/1E 2503, 2504, 2522,

490

2526, 2544, 2552, 4318a, 4322, 4323b, 4324, 4326, 4332, 4341, 4354d2; eleven dorsal valve

491

internal molds: GP/1E 450, 453, 2493, 2498, 2536-2538, 2543, 4339, 4351; twelve ventral valve

492

internal molds: GP/1E 1910, 2489, 2520, 2525, 2527, 2528, 2551, 4354b, 4355b, 4356a, 4356b,

493

4338; other fragmentary material: GP/1E 1906, 1907, 1911, 1914, 2496, 2497, 2499, 2500, 2505,

494

2506, 2508, 2510, 2514-2517, 2521, 2524, 2529, 2530, 2532, 2533, 2535, 2539, 2541, 2546-

495

2550, 2553, 2555, 4320, 4330, 4331, 4334, 4340, 4357.

496 497

Measurements: See Table 5 for Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp. shell measurements.

498

20

499

Remarks: Ambocoelids from the Taciba Formation were first mentioned by Barbosa and

500

Almeida (1949a, b), later briefly described as Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa (Shumard) by

501

Mendes (1952) but interpreted as belonging to a new species (named paulistana) of

502

Attenuatella Stehli, 1954, by Rocha-Campos (1969). Attenuatella paulistana was never

503

published, failing to satisfy article 13 of the ICZN, therefore being a nomen nudum. The

504

Capivari’s ambocoelids exhibit shell shape, slightly incurved umbo, strong ventral median

505

ridge supporting muscle scars, dorsal thin median ridge separating posterior adductors scars and

506

larger anterior adductor scars, that collectively support assingnment to Biconvexiella, as was

507

recently indicated (Taboada et al., 2016).

508

Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp. is comparable to Attenuatella convexa Armstrong,

509

1968, type species of Biconvexiella Waterhouse, 1983a, which occurs in the Tiverton

510

Formation (Sakmarian), Bowen Basin, Queensland, and also present in the Farley Formation,

511

Sydney Basin, New South Wales, Australia (Armstrong and Telford, 1970). It shares with B.

512

saopauloensis n. sp. a biconvex profile, ventral sinus and dorsal fold, as well as comparable

513

internal muscle scars. Nevertheless, B. saopauloensis n. sp. has a more transverse outline, less

514

pronounced ventral valve sinus and shallower dorsal valve fold lacking lateral bounding ridges.

515

B. saopauloensis n. sp. is close to B. roxoi (Oliveira, 1936) (see also Taboada et al., 2016) from

516

the upper part of the Taciba Formation, Paraná Basin, southern Brazil, although the Capivari’

517

species is more transverse with a convex dorsal valve, a stronger and longer ventral median

518

septum and more divergent crural plates. Ogilviecoelia inflata Shi and Waterhouse, 1996, from

519

the Early Permian Jungle Creek Formation, northern Yukon Territory, Canada, resembles B.

520

saopaulensis n. sp. in shell outline and dorsal valve profile, although the Canadian material

521

possesses a micro-ornamentation of fine elongate grooves instead spinose ornament, and a large,

522

depressed and well differentiated ventral muscle field and undifferentiated dorsal adductors,

523

unlike the Brazilian species. 21

524 525

Order Chonetida Nalivkin, 1979

526

Suborder Chonetidina Muir-Wood, 1955

527

Superfamily Chonetoidea Bronn, 1862

528

Family Rugosochonetidae Muir-Wood, 1962

529

Subfamily Quinquenellinae Archbold, 1981

530 531

Genus Quinquenella Waterhouse, 1975

532 533

Type species: Quinquenella glabra Waterhouse, 1975 from the Nambdo Member of the Senja

534

Formation (late Permian), east Jumbla city, north-west Nepal.

535 536

Remarks: Both Tornquistia Paeckelmann, 1930 and Quinquenella are smooth externally and

537

have similar dorsal interiors. Nevertheless, the former is smaller, has a hump-shaped strong

538

convave-convex profile and stout accessory septa in the dorsal valve, unlike the low profile and

539

weaker accessory septa of Quinquenella.

540 541

Quinquenella rionegrensis (Oliveira, 1930)

542

Figure 4.26–4.28

543 544

1930 Chonetes rionegrensis; Oliveira, p. 19, unnumbered figure.

545

2016 Quinquenella rionegrensis (Oliveira, 1930); Taboada et al., 2016, p. 449-450, pl. III,

546

figs. D-L.

547

22

548

Holotype: The holotype of Quinquenella rionegrensis (Oliveira, 1930) is lost (see Taboada et

549

al., 2016, p. 449, 450). Lectotype GP/1E 4339b is from the Taciba Formation, Itararé Group,

550

Paraná Basin, Teixeira Soares region, southern Brazil.

551 552

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

553

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

554 555

Materials: Seven specimens. Two interior molds of dorsal valves, GP/1E-4354c, GP/1E 4358;

556

one exterior mold of dorsal valve, GP/1E 4355a. Other fragmentary material, GP/1E 449, 456,

557

1909, 2523.

558 559

Measurements: See Table 5 for Quinquenella rionegrensis shell measurements.

560 561

Remarks: Available dorsal valves exhibit moderate concavity, subelliptical transverse outline

562

and maximum width at hinge line. Maximum width up 9 mm; maximum length up 5.5 mm with

563

an W/L ratio varying between 1.55-1.76 and W/L average of 1.65. Interior with lines of pustules

564

radially aligned, short lateral septa, thin long accessory septa, ill-defined median septum fused

565

posteriorly surrounding a small, circular shallow alveolus anterior to a small bifid cardinal

566

process. Despite scarcity of material, internal characters and dimensions of dorsal valve fit finely

567

with those observed in Quinquenella rionegrensis (Oliveira, 1930) (see also Taboada et al., 2016)

568

from the upper part of the Taciba Formation, Paraná Basin, southern Brazil. Finally, the

569

Brazilian species was compared to Quinquenella species from Western Australia (see Archbold

570

1981) by Taboada et al. (2016).

571 572

Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758 23

573

Subclass Protobranchia Pelseneer, 1889

574

Order Nuculanida Carter, Campbell and Campbell, 2000

575

Superfamily Nuculanoidea Adams and Adams, 1858 (Gray, 1854)

576

Family Polidevciidae Kumpera, Prantl and Ruzicka, 1960

577 578

Genus Phestia Chernyshev, 1951

579 580

Type species: Leda inflatiformis Chernyshev, 1939 from the Carboniferous of

581

Russia, by original designation.

582 583

Remarks: González (2010) proposed the genus Waterhouseus to include the species Phestia

584

tepuelensis, but the generic diagnosis is not precise. Besides, the differences of Phestia and

585

other closely related genera, such as Polidevcia are not clear in the discussion. Thus, we decide

586

to keep the original name for the Patagonian species (Argentina). A revision of these genera

587

may be necessary but exceeds the scope of this contribution and is an objective of a future

588

research.

589 590

Phestia tepuelensis Gonzalez, 1969

591

Figure 5.1–5.4

592 593

Holotype: MLP 11021 from the Sierra de Languiñeo, Tepuel-Genoa Basin, Chubut, Argentina

594

(Gonzalez, 1969; Pagani, 2004).

595 596

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

597

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian. 24

598 599

Description: Shell very inequilateral, tapering posteriorly with a developed rostrum. Umbones

600

slightly opisthogyrous, small, very depressed, positioned at anterior fourth of shell length. The

601

greatest height of the shell occurs at umbones. Anterior margin rounded forming an obtuse angle

602

with a convex ventral margin; posterior-dorsal margin slightly concave. Surface ornamentation

603

of thick commarginal costae, which are crossed by radial costae; with a pronounced

604

discontinuity in the coarseness of the commarginal ribs from the anterior lobe to the lateral flank.

605

Escutcheon, hinge features and muscle scars not observed.

606 607

Materials: One internal mold of right valve (GP/1E 455) and one external mold of left valve

608

(GP/1E 452).

609 610

Measurements: See Table 6 for Phestia tepuelensis shell measurements.

611 612

Remarks: Phestia tepuelensis was firstly described for the Tepuel-Genoa Basin, Argentina

613

(González, 1969), and revised by Pagani (2004). This species shows strong concentric costae

614

crossed by fine radial ribs, a feature that distinguishes it from seven Argentinean species. Three

615

of them come from Northwestern Argentina: Phestia sp. from San Juan Province (Taboada,

616

1989); Phestia sp. from Río Blanco Basin (González, 1994), both Carboniferous, and Phestia aff.

617

P. bellistriata (Stevens) from Permian deposits of the Tupe Formation (Sterren, 2004). The other

618

four species come from the Tepuel-Genoa Basin, in Patagonia, described by Pagani (2004): P.

619

regularis, P. sabattiniae, Phestia sp. II and Phestia sp. III. The Capivari specimens differ from

620

Phestia aff. P. sabattiniae from the Itararé Group (Taciba Formation, see Neves et al., 2014b),

621

by having an opisthogyrous umbones and a concave posterior-dorsal margin, while in the second

622

species the umbones are orthogyrous and the posterior-dorsal margin is straight. Yet, P. 25

623

tepuelensis presents radial ribs crossing the commarginal costae, a feature absent in the Brazilian

624

specimens. Phestia tepuelensis also differs from two Australian species Phestia darwini

625

(=Nuculana darwini) (Dickins, 1957) and Phestia lyonensis Dickins, 1956. The Brazilian species

626

have narrower umbones, which are very pronounced in P. darwini and the surface of shell is

627

ornamented by commarginal ribs, while in P. lyonensis they can form a shallow V-shaped

628

ornamentation (see Dickins, 1963, p. 37).

629 630

Order Pectinida Gray, 1854

631

Superfamily Chaenocardioidea Miller, 1889

632

Family Streblochondriidae Newell, 1938

633

Subfamily Saturnellinae Astafieva, 1994

634

Genus Streblopteria McCoy, 1851

635 636

Type species: Meleagrina laevigata McCoy, 1844 from Carboniferous of Ireland, by posterior

637

designation of Meek and Worthen (1866, p. 333).

638 639

Remarks: González (2006) described the species Streblopteria montgomeryi for the Mojón de

640

Hierro Formation in Patagonia, Argentina; at the same time Pagani (2006) described the species

641

Streblopteria lagunensis from the same localities. Both species are synonyms and Gonzalez

642

(2006) and Pagani (2006) have the same date of publication. In this way, the rule of

643

“Determination by the First Reviser” (ICZN Article 24.2) is applied, and we use Streblopteria

644

lagunensis in the sense of Pagani (2006). Later, Waterhouse (2010 p. 105) designated the

645

Argentinian specimens of Streblopteria montgomeryi Gonzalez (2006) under a new genus

646

Montorbicula, based on the absence of a resilifer and by the presence of a platyvincular hinge.

647

However, the generic diagnosis is imprecise. Besides, the differences with Streblopteria and 26

648

other related new genera proposed by Waterhouse (2010) are unclear in the discussion. Thus we

649

decided to keep the original generic assignation for the Patagonian species.

650 651

Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis Pagani, 2006

652

Figure 5.5–5.7

653 654

1978 Streblopteria sp. nom. nud.; in Rocha-Campos and Rösler (1978, p. 5).

655

1988 Streblopteria sp. nom. nud.; in Simões et al. (1998, p. 445).

656 657

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

658

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

659 660

Description: Internal mold of right valve, suborbicular, slightly longer than higher, inflated,

661

acline. Umbones slightly project above the cardinal margin. Anterior auricle separated from the

662

shell by a moderately deep byssal notch. Posterior auricle small, subtriangular, with its posterior

663

margin forming an obtuse angle with the postero-dorsal margin. Cardinal margin straight;

664

anterior margin seems to be more expanded than the posterior one; ventral, posterior and,

665

possibly, anterior (fragmented) margins rounded. External surface of shell ornamented by faint

666

and fine growth lines, at least in the ventral margin. Inner cardinal features and muscle scars not

667

observed.

668 669

Material: One internal mold of right valve, GP/1E 457.

670 671

Measurements: See Table 6 for Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis shell measurements.

672 27

673

Remarks: Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis of the Taciba Formation closely resembles

674

Streblopteria lagunensis (=Streblopteria montgomeryi) recorded in lower Permian (Asselian)

675

beds of Patagonia, Argentina (Pagani, 2006, p. 468, fig. 3 M-S; González, 2006, p. 140, fig. 8).

676

The last author suggested that the Argentinean species have smooth shells and inconspicuous

677

commarginal ornamentation, which can also be verified in the Capivari specimen. However, the

678

Brazilian specimen seems to be ornamented by very closely spaced fine growth lines (Figure

679

5.7). Thus, we kept the Capivari species as Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis.

680 681

Superfamily Heteropectinoidea Beurlen, 1954

682

Family Limipectinidae Newell and Boyd, 1990

683

Subfamily Limipectininae Newell and Boyd, 1990

684 685

Genus Limipecten Girty, 1904

686 687

Type species: Limipecten texanus Girty, 1904 from the Carboniferous of Mexico, by

688

subsequent designation of Newell (1938, p. 68).

689 690

Remarks: Mendes (1952) assigned the pectinid of the Taciba Formation, Capivari County, to

691

Aviculopecten capivariensis. He pointed out that these specimens had just one order of costae

692

(Mendes, 1952, p. 13). However, Rocha-Campos (1969) referred them to Limipecten

693

capivariensis, since they show surface ornament formed by two or three order costae (Rocha-

694

Campos, 1969, p. 48). He referred this bivalve to Limipecten capivariensis nom. nud. We agree

695

with this interpretation and here this species is formally described for the first time.

696 697

Limipecten capivariensis (Mendes), 1952 28

698

Figure 5.8–5.10

699 700

1952 Aviculopecten capivariensis; Mendes (p. 12, plate I, figs. 8 e 9).

701

1967 Aviculopecten capivariensis; Rocha-Campos (plate XXIX, fig. 14).

702

1969 Limipecten capivariensis nom. nud.; in Rocha-Campos (p. 47, plate II, F).

703

1988 Limipecten capivariensis nom. nud.; in Simões et al. (1988, p. 445).

704 705

Holotype: The holotype (DGM 4121) of Limipecten capivariensis (Mendes), 1952 is lost.

706

Lectotype GP/1E 2494 from the Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, Capivari

707

county, State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil.

708 709

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

710

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

711 712

Diagnosis: Convex left valve. Valve ornamented by, at least, ten coarse first order radial ribs,

713

intercalated by second order costae; interspaces among ribs wider than in the right valve. Surface

714

of shell crossed by concentric lamellae, forming scalloped lines. Right valve moderately convex.

715

Surface of shell ornamented by twenty-two first order radial ribs, intercalated by second and

716

third order costae; ribs finer and numerous than in the left valve; costae are crossed by concentric

717

regular lamellae.

718 719

Description: Shell orbicular, inequivalved, with length slightly greater than width. Convex left

720

valve; umbo and auricles not preserved (fragmented). Surface of valve ornamented by, at least,

721

ten coarse first order radial ribs; second order ribs increase by intercalation; interspaces among

722

ribs are wider in the left valve. Surface of shell crossed by concentric lamellae, forming 29

723

scalloped lines. Right valve moderately convex, mainly in the ventral margin. Umbo poorly

724

preserved. Anterior ear sharply defined, separated from the body shell by a well-marked byssal

725

sinus; seven first order ribs crossed by concentric regularly spaced lamellae. The posterior ear is

726

poorly preserved. Surface of shell is ornamented by twenty-two first order radial ribs,

727

intercalated by second and third order costae; ribs are much finer and numerous than in the left

728

valve; surface of shell is crossed by concentric regular lamellae, which are also finer and fainter

729

than in the left valve. Internal features of hinge plate not observed.

730 731

Materials: Two external molds, one fragment of left valve, with well preserved surface

732

ornamentation (GP/1T-116), and one almost complete right valve (GP/1E 2494).

733 734

Measurements: See Table 6 for Limipecten capivariensis shell measurements.

735 736

Remarks: Limipecten capivariensis differs from the type species L. texanus, from Texas, USA,

737

by showing much wider interspaces between ribs in the left valve. Additionally, the right valve

738

of the Brazilian shell is much taller than the North American one. The Capivari shells also differ

739

from Limipecten sp. of the Ciénega Larga de Tontal Formation, San Juan, Argentina (Lech and

740

Milana, 2006), by the absence of protuberances in the meeting of ribs and growth lines, which is

741

a remarkable feature of these specimens. Limipecten capivariensis also differs from another

742

Argentinean species: Limipecten? sp. described by González (1972) in the Las Salinas Formation,

743

Chubut, later revised by Pagani (2006) as Limipecten herrerai. In the Brazilian shells, the radial

744

ribs are well spaced than in L. herrerai. Yet, the commarginal lamellae are more well spaced

745

than in the Argentinian specimens.

746 747

Infrasubcohort Cardiidia Férussac, 1822 30

748

Superfamily Grammysioidea Miller, 1877

749

Family Sanguinolitidae Miller, 1877

750

Subfamily Sanguinolitinae Miller, 1877

751

Genus Praeundulomya Dickins, 1957

752 753

Type-species. Praeundulomya concentrica Dickins, 1957 from the Carnarvon Basin, lower

754

Permian, Western Australia.

755 756

Praeundulomya cf. subelongata Dickins, 1963

757

Figure 5.11–5.12

758 759

Occurrence. Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

760

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

761 762

Description. Internal mold strongly inequilateral, subequivalve, very elongate posteriorly.

763

Umbones subterminal; beaks slightly prosogyrous. Very narrow sinus extending from the

764

umbones to ventral margin; well-developed postumbonal ridge extends to posteroventral

765

extremity. Anterodorsal margin very short; anterior margin rounded; ventral margin slightly

766

convex; posterior extremity rounded and defined by the respiratory margin. Lunule and

767

escutcheon were not observed. Surface ornament of very coarse, regularly spaced

768

commarginal rugae. Hinge edentulous. Muscle scars not observed.

769 770

Material. One internal mold of conjugated valves (GP/1E-5242).

771 772

Measurements: See Table 6 for Praeundulomya cf. subelongata shell measurements. 31

773 774

Remarks: Praeundulomya subelongata was first described by Dickins (1963), in the Fossil Cliff

775

Formation, Western Australia. Recently, this species was reported as Praeundulomya cf.

776

subelongata, in the Taciba Formation, Itararé Group (Neves et al., 2014b). The Capivari

777

specimen closely resembles that of the Taciba Formation. For this reason, we assign the Capivari

778

material to Praeundulomya cf. subelongata. This species differs from Praeundulomya moreli

779

Gonzalez, 2006 from Early Permian beds of Tepuel-Genoa Basin, Argentina. The Brazilian shell

780

is very elongated posteriorly, with the postero-ventral angle defined by a well-marked

781

postumbonal carina, while the shell of P. moreli shells is more subquadrate in outline, with a

782

truncate dorsal-posterior margin, and the postero-ventral angle forming a gentle carina.

783 784

Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1797

785

Order Vertigastropoda Salvini-Plawen, 1980

786

Superfamily Eotomarioidea Wenz, 1938

787

Family Eotomarridae Wenz, 1938

788

Subfamily Neilsoniidae Knight, 1956

789 790

Genus Peruvispira Chronic, 1949

791 792

Type species: Peruvispira delicata Chronic, 1949 from the Copacabana Group (lower Permian),

793

Peru.

794 795

Remarks: Peruvispira is a genus that close resembles Ptycomphalina Fischer 1885 (see Dickins,

796

1963, p. 126), and Pleurocintosa Fletcher (1958). Indeed, according to Dickins (1961),

797

Peruvispira is similar to Ptycomphalina but ‘characterized by the possession of a distinct 32

798

revolving concave area about as wide as and below the slit-band’. On the other hand, the

799

relationship of Peruvispira and other Late Paleozoic gastropods, such as Pleurocintosa, was

800

recently discussed by Taboada et al. (2015). We agree with them that Pleurocintosa cannot be

801

regarded as a valid genus, since it was erected based on inconspicuous (e.g., weak spiral filae)

802

and highly variable characters (e.g., presence of a third and peribasal carina bounding the

803

alveozone) found in species of Peruvispira (see Taboada et al., 2015, p. 219 for details).

804 805

Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp.

806

Figure 6.1–6.2

807 808

1966 Peruvispira delicata nom. nud.; in Rocha-Campos, p. 10, fig. 3 a, b.

809

1970 Peruvispira delicata nom. nud.; Rocha-Campos, p. 607, fig. 3.

810 811

Holotype: GP/1E-4319 from the Taciba Formation, State of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil.

812 813

Diagnosis: Pleurotomarid shell with 4-5 very concave whorls; deep and strongly concave

814

selenizone, ornamented by 8-9 lunulae per mm, bounded by two prominent carinae. Shell

815

ornamentation of thin growth lines (7-8 per mm).

816 817

Occurrence: Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

818

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

819 820

Description: Small and turbiniform pleurotomarid shell, moderately thick; apex and upper whorl

821

slightly convex; shell with 4-5 very concave whorls; selenizone deep and strongly concave,

822

moderately wide, ornamented by 9-10 concave lunulae per mm, bounded by two prominent 33

823

carinae; shell ornamented by 7-8 thin growth lines per mm. Lower face continuously rounded

824

and convex, not flattened; sutures well impressed; inner lip poorly preserved; outer lip well

825

developed, convex and rounded, becoming almost perpendicular to the last whorl to form a sinus.

826

Shell body thicker near aperture.

827 828

Etymology: From Brazil.

829 830

Materials: Three external molds, GP/1E-4319 and 4348A, B.

831 832

Measurements: See Table 6 for Peruvispira brasiliensis n. sp. shell measurements.

833 834

Remarks: Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp. differs from the type species P. delicata Chronic, 1949,

835

from the Carboniferous of Peru, by the presence of very concave whorls, limited by a deep and

836

strongly concave selenizone. The Brazilian species closely resemble Peruvispira cf. umariensis

837

(Dickins, 1963, p. 126), from Western Australia, however they differ in the density of the growth

838

lines. Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp. is ornamented by 7-8 growth lines per mm, while P. cf.

839

umariensis is nearly 4 per mm. Additionally, the Brazilian species shows higher and more

840

concave whorls. Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp. can be distinguished from P. sueroi from the Late

841

Paleozoic beds of Chubut, Argentina (Sabatini and Norait, 1969) by having a very concave

842

whorl area, in which the spires are gradually higher toward the anterior region. In P. sueroi, the

843

whorl area is slightly convex and the basal whorl is much higher than the other ones. Peruvispira

844

australis is another comparable Argentinean species from San Juan, Mendoza and Chubut

845

(Sabatini and Noirat, 1969, p 104). P. australis differs from P. brasilensis n. sp. by the same

846

characters of P. sueroi, for being three times wider and having more widely spaced growth lines

847

(2-3 per mm) as well. 34

848 849

Class Crinoidea Miller, 1821

850

Subclass and order uncertain

851

Group Pentameri Moore, Jeffords and Miller, 1968

852

Family øPentacauliscidae Moore, Jeffords and Miller, 1968

853 854

Genus øPentaridica Moore, Jeffords and Miller, 1968

855 856

Type species: øPentaridica rothi Moore, Jeffords and Miller, 1968.

857 858

øPentaridica sp.

859

Figure 6.4-6.6

860 861

Occurrence. Capivari County, State of São Paulo. Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná

862

Basin, Brazil. Latest Asselian–earliest Sakmarian.

863 864

Materials: Four individual discs (articular facet) GP/1E-4321; 4349 B and C; 4350C, and one

865

pluricolumn, GP/1E 4349A.

866 867

Measurements: See Table 7 for crinoid discs measurements.

868 869

Remarks: The overwhelming majority of Paleozoic crinoids are preserved as disarticulated

870

skeletal elements, mainly stem ossicles. In most cases linking them with other anatomical crinoid

871

parts (i.e., crowns) is virtually impossible. Therefore, in many cases, as is the case of the genus

872

øPentaridica, the taxonomy is based only on stem anatomy. Thus, stem-based genera have a 35

873

minimal chance to express true phylogenetic relationships (Głuchowski, 2002). Despite the

874

difficult determining the biological consistency of crinoid species on stem morphology alone (for

875

detailed discussion see Moore et al., 1968; Donovan 2001; Głuchowski, 2002) stem elements are,

876

in many cases, unique and allow specific identification.

877

The studied specimens are represented by 22 individual discs (articular facet) and three

878

pluricolumn remains (stems), which are, in the most part, poorly preserved. However, the

879

specimens GP/1E 4319 and 4349 B, C shows articular facets with well-preserved peripheral

880

crenularia, which can be referred to øPentaridica sp. (Dr. Julio Hlebszevitsch, personal

881

communication, April 2016).

882 883

4. Results

884

A total of 150 specimens were studied, belonging to Brachiopoda (77%), Mollusca (7%) and

885

Echinodermata, Crinoidea (16%) (Table 4). They were assigned to four brachiopod species

886

(Lyonia rochacamposi, Rhynchopora grossopunctata, Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp,

887

Quinquenella rionegrensis), four bivalve species (Phestia tepuelensis, Streblopteria aff. S.

888

lagunensis, Limipecten capivariensis, Praeundulomya cf. subelongata), and two gastropod

889

species [Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp, and Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp.] (Tables 5, 6). Crinoid

890

columns were assigned to øPentaridica (Table 7). The overwhelming majority of brachiopod

891

shells belong to Biconvexiella saopauloensis (n= 86, 74,8%), and is followed by Rhynchopora

892

grossopunctata (n=20, 1,7%). Table 4 shows the total number of the remaining brachiopod

893

specimens. On the other hand, the bivalves are less common with just a few specimens of each

894

taxon (Table 4). The gastropods are also rare and represented by three shells only, two assigned

895

to Peruvispira brasilensis, and one to Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp., this last one just illustrated

896

here (Fig. 6). Therefore, the assemblage is dominated by shells of Biconvexiella saopauloensis,

897

and is here referred as the Bs assemblage. 36

898

As noted above, the taphonomic information available for the bioclastic remains in the Bs

899

assemblage is limited, but some observations are noteworthy. First, the majority of both

900

brachiopod and bivalve shells are disarticulated. The most preserved specimens (articulated

901

shells) are illustrated in the figures 4 and 5. However, the shells are complete and the

902

ornamentation (when visible) is well preserved (i.e., signs of abrasion, bioerosion, and

903

encrustation are missing), and various size classes are represented. Closed articulated bivalve

904

mollusk shells are also observed. Indeed, Praeundulomya cf. subelongata is preserved with

905

closed articulated shells, and with the long axis inclined ~40° to bedding. Due to compaction, the

906

specimen is slightly compressed through the anterior-posterior axis of the shell. Thus, the angle

907

between the long axis and bedding has probably been reduced.

908

Finally, the crinoid remains are represented mainly by disarticulated skeletal ossicles

909

(mostly columnals), which are disperse in the matrix. Crinoid remains varies in size from 1.5 to

910

3.5 mm, and abrasion of crenelations and edges are not visible (i.e., columnals are pristine, see

911

Figure 6). Signs of encrustation, bioerosion and corrosion are also missing.

912 913

5. Discussion

914

5.1. Depositional environment

915

In the study area, the investigated marine fossil bed is recorded in the Taciba Formation

916

(formerly referred as Capivari Formation) and placed 100-150 m from the contact with the

917

overlying, post-glacial Early Permian Tatui Formation. The vertical profile reveals the interplay

918

of distinct sedimentary processes in a subaqueous environment and the presence of an

919

invertebrate marine fauna in a glacio-marine context. A clear change in the marine setting from a

920

low- to a high-energy environment is recorded, probably due to a glacier advance event in the

921

depositional setting (Fig. 3). Initially, sedimentation took place in a distal, low-energy

922

environment in an epeiric sea with free-floating icebergs. In this context, massive mudstones 37

923

overlying dark shales suggests increased sediment input (Fig. 3). The presence of bottom

924

currents, which resulted in current-rippled medium- to fine-grained sandstones are indicative of

925

bedform migration, coupled with sediment transportation by suspension (Fig. 3). Trough cross-

926

bedded strata interbedded with laminated siltstone occurs in the middle portion of the studied

927

section and records increased high-energy processes. This suggests migrating 3D bedforms

928

formed by subaqueous meltwater flows and/or turbiditic currents. Due to the rapid sedimentation

929

of these beds, flame structures were formed by the overloading of medium-grained massive

930

sandstones on fine-grained facies. Association with crudely parallel-laminated, plant-bearing

931

siltstones contrasts with the dysoxic environment during deposition of dark gray shales recorded

932

in the lowermost portion of the studied section. Increased sediment supply and input of

933

phytoclasts are suggestive of terrestrial contribution probably derived from contemporaneous

934

coastal progradational systems, or directly supplied by subaqueous outwash currents associated

935

with oscillating glacier margins in the context of a wet-based grounded ice shelf. To the top,

936

fossil-bearing silty shales record the environmental change to a low-energy shelfal depositional

937

setting (Fig. 3). The intervening of an episode of glacial retreat is corroborated by the absence of

938

iceberg-related dropstones and meltwater bottom currents. The relatively calm offshore

939

environment that was colonized by the marine invertebrates was eventually disrupted by high-

940

energy sedimentation events that enhanced fossil preservation. After that, a new glacial advance

941

event induced the sedimentation of pebbly mudstones that may have inhibited the bottom

942

colonization by shelly benthos. In the examined sedimentary succession, the percentage of

943

pebbles increases upward and the transition to pebbly silty sandstone is indicative of renewed

944

glacial sedimentation in the depositional setting.

945 946

5.2. Taphonomy

38

947

As commented above the taphonomic information available for the bioclastic remains in the Bs

948

assemblage is limited and mainly based on museum specimens that were not properly collected

949

for taphonomic studies. Anyway, some observations are worth to mention. Most of brachiopods

950

and bivalves are represented by disarticulated shells. However, the shells are complete and the

951

ornamentation (when visible) is well preserved, including various size classes. These features

952

indicate that after death most of the shells had, probably, limited exposure at the sediment/water

953

interface, suffering only minor lateral transport. These are probably parautochthonous (sensu

954

Kidwell et al., 1986) elements in this assemblage. By contrast, specimens of Praeundulomya cf.

955

subelongata were preserved in situ. Similar preservational conditions are also noted in

956

specimens of Praeundulomya and other associated Grammysioidea bivalves in the uppermost

957

part of the Taciba Formation, State of Paraná, southern Brazil (see Neves et al., 2014b). There,

958

the shells are preserved in fine to very fine sandstones/siltstones with hummocky cross-

959

stratification and intercalated mudstones forming stacked storm deposits in distal shoreface

960

settings (Neves et al., 2014b). As in the case of Praeundulomya from the Capivari beds, those

961

shells are closed articulated, compacted, and with the anterior margin pointing downward. The

962

long axis of the shell inclined 40°-50° to bedding. As convincingly demonstrated by Anelli et al.

963

(1998), such specimens were preserved in life position, and a similar condition is inferred for

964

Praeundulomya from the Bs assemblage. Hence, this species is the unique autochthonous

965

element so far identified in this assemblage.

966

The crinoid remains are all usually small (1.5 to 3.5 mm) disarticulated ossicles or rarely

967

articulated stem segments, without any signs of abrasion, encrustation, bioerosion and/or

968

corrosion. These taphonomic signatures indicates that after death and disarticulation, which can

969

occur in a few weeks, the columnals were not intensely transported and sorted (see Llewellyn

970

and Messing, 1993). Thus, the crinoid remains are probably parautochthonous. Finally, the

971

presence of comminuted plant remains (Fig. 3) is also worth mentioning, suggesting the 39

972

contribution of allochthonous materials from coastal settings during events of enhanced riverine

973

freshwater input.

974 975

5.3. Paleoautoecology

976

The Bs assemblage is numerically dominated by ambocoelids, a group of small, thin-shelled

977

brachiopods with an open delthyrium and a pedicle during life (see He et al., 2012). However,

978

the fine-grained, soft, siliciclastic-dominated facies where Biconvexiella saopauloensis is

979

recorded may have offered limited site opportunities for pedicle attachment. Indeed, the shells

980

are not found in clusters, and signs of encrustation are unknown in the studied specimens. Hence,

981

this tiny and spinose brachiopod species may have lived on soft substrates with the ventral valve

982

partially embedded within the substrate, a condition also shown by other ambocoelids (e.g.,

983

Ambocoelia gregaria Hall, 1860; in Zambito and Schemm-Gregory, 2013). The presence of

984

spine bases suggest that the shell was covered by tinny spines in life.

985

Given the dominance of Biconvexiella saopauloensis in the assemblage, this species may

986

haveacted as a pioneer species in muddy, dysoxic bottoms during deposition of host sediments.

987

Indeed, as for other ambocoelids (e.g., Attenuatella mengi He et al., 2012), this shell form is

988

usually associated with low oxygen and/or limited trophic resources in the sedimentary settings

989

inhabited by those brachiopods (see He et al., 2012 and references therein). Their small size is a

990

good indicator that the conditions were stressful, probably coupled with oscillations in the

991

oxygen content, salinity and food-supply. The linoproductids, such as Lyonia rochacamposi,

992

with spinose convex ventral valves, are interpreted as a quasi-infaunal, suspension feeders that

993

lived partially buried in soft substrates (see Cisterna et al., 2017). The other two brachiopods in

994

the Bs assemblage (Rhynchopora grossopunctata, Quinquenella rionegrensis) were epifaunal

995

suspension feeders.

40

996

The bivalves Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis and Limipecten capivariensis were both

997

stationary epifaunal suspension feeders (Stanley, 1970, 1972), whereas Praeundulomya cf.

998

subelongata with a posteriorly elongated shell (Stanley, 1970) was a facultatively mobile

999

infaunal suspension feeder. As other nuculanoids, Phestia tepuelensis was a facultatively mobile

1000

infaunal deposit feeder/suspension feeder (Stanley, 1970). The other mollusks in the assemblage,

1001

the small gastropod Peruvispira and Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp. were both facultatively

1002

mobile epifaunal suspension feeders or grazers (Aberhan and Kiessling, 2015). Yet, Peruvispira

1003

is known for its broad environmental tolerances in Early Permian marine assemblages from

1004

Australia (Clapham and James, 2008). Finally, the crinoid was a stationary epifaunal suspension

1005

feeder.

1006 1007

5.4. Paleocommunity and paleoenvironment

1008

With only 11 genera, the Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage is diverse when compared

1009

with other coeval benthic marine assemblages associated with LPIA sedimentary successions in

1010

South America (i.e., Argentina) and Australia (see data in Cisterna et al., 2019 and references

1011

therein). However, among the known macroinvertebrate marine faunas of the upper part of the

1012

Taciba Formation, the Bs assemblage is the most diverse one, including members of three major

1013

phyla (Brachiopoda, Mollusca and Echinodermata). The assemblage encompasses benthic

1014

invertebrates occupying distinct substrate tierings (Table 8). The epifaunal tiering encompassed

1015

(a) the low-level stationary epifaunal suspension feeders, including all the brachiopods, and

1016

epifaunal bivalves. Numerically, this was the dominant ecological group in the assemblage, (b)

1017

the stationary upper-level epifaunal suspension feeders (i.e., crinoids), and (c) vagile epifaunal

1018

suspension feeders or grazers (Aberhan and Kiessling (2015), including all the small gastropods.

1019

The shallow infaunal tiering was occupied by (d) facultatively mobile infaunal deposit

1020

feeders/suspension feeders, such as the protobranchiate bivalves (i.e., Phestia), and (e) the 41

1021

facultatively mobile shallow infaunal suspension feeders (i.e., Praeundulomya). Both infaunal

1022

groups colonized the fine-grained, siliclastic-dominated substrates of the Capivari marine beds

1023

just a few centimeters below the sediment water/interface. Surprisingly, planktic and nektic

1024

organisms are missing in the assemblage. The absence of these groups may be a result of a

1025

combination of processes related to taphonomic and sampling biases and/or stressful

1026

paleoenvironmental conditions. The fossil-bearing mudstones of the Taciba Formation are dark

1027

grey/green (or even yellowish when weathered), and finely laminated (horizontal bedding)

1028

indicating the settling of muds in quiet shelf, with restricted oxygen and food supply. Indeed, as

1029

commented by Harper and Moran (1997, p. 235) brachiopods, the numerically dominant group

1030

in the assemblage, were minimalist animals, “operating as a ciliary suspension feeder, if

1031

necessary, at very low oxygen levels.” The general small body size of the Capivari brachiopod

1032

fauna is in accordance with these observations.

1033

The presence of members of the rhynchonelliform brachiopods, sanguinolitid and pectinid

1034

bivalves, pleurotomariid gastropods and crinoids clearly indicates that the Bs assemblage is fully

1035

marine. However, the restricted vertical distribution of these marine groups in the uppermost part

1036

of the Itararé Group in the São Paulo State suggests that the background conditions were

1037

generally unfavourable to the profuse development of the benthic fauna or their preservation. As

1038

noted above, the invertebrates lived and/or were preserved in a distal glaciomarine environment

1039

during more proximal marine deglaciation (Figs. 7, 8, see Vesely and Assine, 2006, p. 164). The

1040

clay-rich, fossil-bearing marine horizon containing members of the Bs assemblage show no

1041

evidence of glacial influence (ice-rafted dropstones), indicating that this may correspond to a

1042

time of ice retreat during the sequence time span (Fig. 7, 8). This interval may correspond to a

1043

time of climatic amelioration, also supported by the presence of plant remains recorded in

1044

laminated siltstones, located nearly 2 meters below the marine fossil-bearing interval (Figs. 3, 7,

1045

8). This may indicate the presence of plant covered, deglaciated continental terrains (Fig. 8). 42

1046

Finally, Cisterna et al. (2017, and references therein) suggested that a complex array of

1047

abiotic factors encompassing variation in salinity and oxygen contents, water turbidity and depth,

1048

and food-supply are among the main controlling factors in the development of marine benthic

1049

faunas during deglacial events of LPIA. Notably, a comparison between the gross taxonomic

1050

composition and ecological structure of the Capivari marine fauna with those coevals from the

1051

upper part of the Taciba Formation, southern Brazil (Simões et al., 2012; Neves et al., 2014b;

1052

Taboada et al., 2016), strongly support the observations made by Cisterna et al. (2017). The

1053

benthic marine assemblages recorded in the so-called Rio da Areia sandstone and Baitaca

1054

siltstone, in the upper part of the Taciba Formation (Neves et al., 2014b), which are dominated

1055

by epifaunal and infaunal suspension feeding bivalves lived in quite distinct paleoenvironmental

1056

conditions compared to those of the Bs assemblage. Taphonomic and sedimentologic

1057

information (Neves et al., 2014b) conclusively indicates that the benthic faunas from the

1058

southern part of the basin lived in coastal to shelf areas commonly affected by moderate to

1059

strong bottom currents and episodically affected by high-energy flows and currents generated by

1060

storms, which is not the case of the Bs assemblage.

1061 1062

5.5. Biostratigraphic implications

1063

Our data support the correlation of the Bs assemblage with those from the uppermost part of the

1064

Taciba Formation, from southern Brazil, as previously pointed out by Taboada et al. (2016, p.

1065

437). Particularly noteworthy is the record of Lyonia rochacamposi that is common in the Taciba

1066

Formation from the Bela Vista do Sul assemblage (Taboada et al., 2016). Additionally, close

1067

species of Quinquenella, Phestia, Limipecten, and Praeundulomya are also recorded in the

1068

Teixeira Soares assemblages (Neves et al., 2014b; Taboada et al., 2016). Hence, the Bs

1069

assemblage correlates with the upper portion of the Itararé Group from southern Brazil,

1070

suggesting an early Permian (latest Asselian-earliest Sakmarian) age. These data indicate that the 43

1071

marine fossil-bearing beds of Capivari and Teixeira Soares regions are stratigraphic records of

1072

northward transgressive events during the end of LPIA in the Paraná Basin. Faunal similarities

1073

suggest that the latest Asselian-earliest Sakmarian Paraná marine assemblages correlate with

1074

those of the Sauce Grande-Colorado (Argentina), Huab (Hardap shale of the Dwyka Group),

1075

Aranos area (Namibia), southwest Africa, and the Carnarvon (Western Australia) basins, and

1076

characterize the Eurydesma-Lyonia chronozone, reinforcing the paleogeography scenario of a

1077

W-E trans-Gondwanan marine seaway linking those basins during the Early Permian, as detailed

1078

discussed in Taboada et al. (2016).

1079 1080

6. Significance and concluding remarks

1081

In this contribution, we report a cool-water fauna from the LPIA, which was found in a fossil-

1082

rich bed of the upper part of the Itararé Group from the Capivari county, on the eastern border of

1083

the Paraná Basin. The fauna was described and its stratigraphic position within the glacial Itararé

1084

Group better constrained. The measured sedimentary succession is placed between 100-150 m

1085

below the contact with the overlying, post-glacial Early Permian Tatuí Formation.

1086

Members of the Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage flourished in a rather confined

1087

paleogeographic setting in the northeastern border of the Paraná Basin, under stressful conditions

1088

mainly linked to changes in oxygen content and food-supply. Although evidences of freshwater

1089

discharge from coastal areas are recorded in the studied sedimentary succession, the Bs

1090

assemblage is fully marine, suggesting that salinity conditions were normal, at least during the

1091

time of benthic faunal development.

1092

The fossil-bearing marine beds of Capivari county may represent short-lived transgressive

1093

events during periods of ice retreats. These beds are overlain by pebbly mudstones and silty

1094

sandstones recording high energy processes under glacial conditions. Since Bs assemblage is

1095

placed in between subaqueous glacial facies associations, they may correspond to high frequency 44

1096

interglacials. Consequently, the fossil-bearing marine beds generated in this stratigraphic context

1097

are thin and difficult to find within the thick glacial package. This is particularly true when

1098

proper subsurface data are missing and/or outcrops are deeply weathered and covered by dense

1099

vegetation, which is the case for the studied fossil-bearing beds. Faunal composition indicates

1100

that the transgressive fossil-bearing beds of the Capivari region correlates with those of the upper

1101

part of the Taciba Formation from the southern part of the Paraná Basin (States of Paraná and

1102

Santa Catarina), suggesting an Early Permian (latest Asselian-earliest Sakmarian) age. Indeed, in

1103

the upper part of the Taciba Formation, the spore-pollen assemblages are referable to the

1104

Vittatina costabilis Biozone of the Paraná Basin indicative of an Early Permian age (Souza and

1105

Callegari, 2004; Souza and Toigo, 2005; Souza, 2006). These marine faunas also indicate the

1106

increase of glacial-marine depositional conditions in the uppermost part of the Itararé Group,

1107

which is tied to the last cycle of ice advance and retreat during the LPIA.

1108 1109

Acknowledgments

1110

The authors are very indebted to the Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São

1111

Paulo, for access and support in the study of the invertebrate collection of the Capivari fossils.

1112

We also thank Ivone C. Gonzales, IGc/USP, for assistance with this collection. Julio

1113

Hlebszevitsch helped us with crinoid identification and Suzana A. Matos, IBB/UNESP, assisted

1114

us in the field. Hence, both are here acknowledged. Many thanks also to Paul A. Johnston, and

1115

two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions, corrections and comments that improved the

1116

final version of the manuscript. Editor-in-Chief, Francisco J. Vega is also acknowledged for the

1117

useful suggestions and corrections. Finally, we also thank the paleoillustrator Julio L.C. Bezerra

1118

for the “Capivari sea” paleoscene. Financial support was offered by FAPESP and CNPq, Brazil,

1119

and CONICET, Argentina. JPN was a fellow of FAPESP (grant 2013/25317-7). This project is a

45

1120

contribution to the following FAPESP projects: 2013/25317-7 and 2014/09149-0. CNPq grants:

1121

304925/2017-9 to MLA and 301023/94-3 to MGS.

1122 1123

References

1124

Aberhan, M., Kiessling, W., 2015. Persistent ecological shifts in marine molluscan assemblages

1125

across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction: Proceedings of the National Academy of

1126

Sciences, 112, 7207–7212.

1127 1128 1129

Adams H., Adams A., 1858. The genera of Recent Mollusca; arranged according to their organization. London, van Voorst., Vol. 1: 484 pp.; vol. 2: 661 pp.; vol. 3: 138 pls. Anelli, L.E., Rocha-Campos, A.C., and Fairchild, T.R., 2000. Paleontologia: guia de aulas

1130

práticas, uma introdução ao estudo dos fósseis: 174 pp., segunda edição, Gráfica IGc-USP,

1131

São Paulo.

1132

Anelli, L.E., Simões, M.G., and Rocha-Campos, A.C., 1998. Mode of life of some Brazilian Late

1133

Paleozoic anomalodesmatans. In: Johnston, P.A., and Haggart, J.W.(Eds.), Bivalves: An

1134

Eon of evolution: Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell: Calgary University

1135

Press, 69–74.

1136 1137 1138

Archbold, N.W., 1981. Studies on Western Australian Permian Brachiopods. 2. The Family Rugosochonetidae: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 93, 109–128. Archbold, N.W., 1983. Studies on Western Australian Permian Brachiopods. 3. The Family

1139

Linoproductidae Stehli 1954: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 95, 237–254.

1140

Archbold, N.W., 1995. Studies on Western Australian Permian Brachiopods 12. Additions to the

1141

Late Asselian-Tastubian faunas: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 107, 95– 112.

1142

Archbold, N.W., and Hogeboom, T., 2000. Subsurface brachiopoda from borehole cores through

1143

the Early Permian sequence of the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia: Correlations with

1144

palynological biostratigraphy: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 112, 93–109. 46

1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152

Armstrong, J., 1968. The unusual brachial skeleton of Attenuatella convexa sp. nov.: Palaeontology, 2, 783–792. Armstrong, J., and Telford, P., 1970. Species of Attenuatella Stehli (Brachiopoda) from New South Wales: Proceedings of the Linnean Society, 94, 113–118. Astafieva, M.M., 1994. A revision of the Chaenocardiidae (=Streblochondriidae) (Bivalvia, Pectinoidea): Paleontological Journal, 28, 1–22. Barbosa, O., and Almeida, F.D., 1949a. Nota sobre a estratigrafia da Série Tubarão em São Paulo: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 21, 65–68.

1153

Barbosa, O., and Almeida, F.D., 1949b. A Série Tubarão na bacia do Rio Tietê, Estado de São

1154

Paulo. Boletim do Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (Divisão Geologia e

1155

Mineralogia), Notas Preliminares e Estudos, 48, 1–18.

1156

Barbosa, O., and Gomes, F. A., 1958. Pesquisa de petróleo na bacia do Rio Corumbataí, Estado

1157

de São Paulo: Boletim do Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (Divisão Geologia e

1158

Mineralogia), 171, 1–40.

1159

Beurlen, K., 1954. As faunas de lamilibrânquios do Sistema Gondwânico no Paraná. In: Lange,

1160

F.W. (Ed.), Paleontologia do Paraná: Comissão de Comemorações do Centenário do Paraná.

1161

Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil, 107–136.

1162 1163 1164 1165

Bieler, R., Carter, J.G., and Coan, E.V., 2010. Classification of Bivalve Families (Part 2). In: Bouchet, P., Rocroi, J.P.(Eds.), Nomenclator of Bivalve Families: Malacology, 52, 1–184. Bronn, H.G., 1862. Die Klassen und Ordnungen der Weichthiere (Malacozoa): C.F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipizig and Heidelberg, 3, 1–518.

1166

Cagliari, J., Correa Lavina, E.L., Philipp, R.P., Wohnrat Tognoli, F.M., and Basei, M.A.S.,

1167

Faccini, U.F., 2014. New Sakmarian ages for the Rio Bonito Formation (Paraná Basin,

1168

southern Brazil) based on LA-ICP-MS U-Pb radiometric dating of zircons crystals: Journal

1169

of South American Earth Sciences, 56, 265–277. 47

1170

Cagliari, J., Philipp, R.P., Buso, V.V., Netto, R.G., Hillebrand, P.K, Lopes, R.C., and Basei,

1171

M.A.S., Faccini, U.F., 2016. Age constraints of the glaciation in the Paraná Basin: evidence

1172

from new U-Pb dates: Journal of the Geological Society, 173, 871–874.

1173

Canuto, J.R., 1985. Origem dos diamictitos e de rochas associadas do Sub-Grupo Itararé, no sul

1174

do Estado do Paraná e norte do Estado de Santa Catarina. Master Thesis, Universidade de

1175

São Paulo. [in Portuguese]

1176 1177

Carter, J.G., Campbell, D.C., and Campbell, M.R., 2000. Cladistic perspectives on early bivalve evolution: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 177, 47–79.

1178

Carter, J.L., Johnson, J.G., Gouvernnec, R., and Hou, H.F.., 2006. Spiriferida. In: Kaesler, R.L.

1179

(Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Pt. H, Brachiopoda (Revised): The Geological

1180

Society of America and The University of Kansas, 5. 1689–1864.

1181

Carter, J.G., Altaba, C.R., Anderson, L.C., Araujo, R., Biakov, A.S., Bogan, A.E., Campbell,

1182

D.C., Campbell, M., Jin-hua, C., Cope, J.C.W., Delvene, G., Dijkstra, H.H., Zong-jie, F.,

1183

Gardner, R.N., Gavrilova, V.A., Goncharova, I.A., Harries, P.J., Hartman, J.H., Hautmann,

1184

M., Hoeh, W.R., Hylleberg, J., Bao-yu, J., Johnston, P., Kirkendale, L., Kleemann, K.,

1185

Koppka, J., Kříž, J., Machado, D., Malchus, N., Márquez-Aliaga, A., Masse, J., McRoberts,

1186

C.A., Middelfart, P.U., Mitchell, S., Nevesskaja, L.A., Özer, S., Pojeta, J., Jr., I., Polubotko,

1187

V., Pons, J. M., Popov, S., Sánchez, T., Sartori, A. F., Scott, R. W., Sey, I.I., Signorelli, J. H.,

1188

Silantiev, V.V., Skelton, P.W., Steuber, T. Waterhouse, J.B., Wingard, G.L., and Yancey, T.,

1189

2011. A Synoptical Classification of the Bivalvia (Mollusca): University of Kansas,

1190

Paleontological Contributions, 4, 1–47.

1191

Castro, J.C., 1999. Estratigrafia de Sequencias das formações Campo Mourão (Parte Superior) e

1192

Taciba, Grupo Itararé, leste da Bacia do Paraná: Revista Brasileira de Geologia, 29, 225–

1193

260.

48

1194

Cisterna, G.A., and Simanauskas, T., 2000. Brachiopods from the Rio del Peñón Formation, Río

1195

Blanco Basin, Upper Palaeozoic of Argentina: Revista Española de Paleontología, 15, 129–

1196

151.

1197

Cisterna, G.A., Sterren, A.F., Gamundí, O.L., and Vergel, M.M., 2017. Carboniferous

1198

postglacial faunas in the late Serpukhovian–Bashkirian interval of centralwestern Argentina.

1199

Alcheringa, 41, 413–431.

1200

Cisterna, G.A., Sterren, A.F., Shi, G.R., Halpern, K., and Balseiro, D., 2019. Brachiopod

1201

assemblages of the Eurydesma fauna in glacial/deglacial sequences from Argentina and

1202

Australia: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 125, 805–826.

1203

Chernyshev, B.I., 1939. Atlas of the guide forms of the fossil faunas of the U.R.S.S., Middle and

1204

Upper Carboniferous: Tsentra'nyy Nauchno-Issledovatel' skiy Geologo-Rasveddochnyy

1205

Institut. Leningrad and Moscow, 5, 113–126.

1206

Chernyshev, B.I., 1951. The family Ledidae in the Carboniferous deposits of U.R.S.S.: Trudy

1207

Institut Geologicheskikh Nauk, Seriya Stratigrafii i Paleontologii, Akademiya Nauk,

1208

Ukraine S.S.R., Kiev, 2, 1–40.

1209

Chronic, J., 1949. Invertebrate Paleontology (Except Fusulinids and Corals). In: Newell, N.D.,

1210

Chronic, J., and Roberts, T.C.(Eds.), Upper Paleozoic of Peru: The Geological Society of

1211

America, Memoir, 58, 43–164.

1212

Clapham, M.E., and James, N.P., 2008. Paleoecology of Early–Middle Permian marine

1213

communities in Eastern Australia: response to global climate change in the aftermath of the

1214

Late Paleozoic ice age. Palaios, 23, 738–750.

1215 1216 1217

Cooper, G.A., and Grant, R.E., 1976. Permian Brachiopods of West Texas, V: Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 24, 2609–3159. Cuvier, G., 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux: Paris, xvi+710 p.

49

1218 1219 1220 1221 1222

Derby, O.A., 1878. A Geologia da Região Diamantífera da Província do Paraná: Archivos do Museu Nacional, 3, 89–98. Dickins, J.M., 1956. Permian pelecypods from the Carnarvon Basin, western Australia: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin, 29, 1–42. Dickins, J.M., 1957. Lower Permian pelecypods and gastropods from the Carnavon Basin.

1223

Western Australia: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin, 41, 1–

1224

74.

1225 1226 1227 1228 1229

Dickins, J.M., 1961. Permian pelecypods newly recorded from Eastern Australia: Paleontology, 4, 119–130. Dickins, J.M., 1963. Permian pelecypods and gastropods from western Australia: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin, 63, 1–149. Donovan, S.K., 2001. Evolution of Caribbean echinoderms during the Cenozoic: moving

1230

towards a complete picture using all of the fossils: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,

1231

Palaeoecology, 166, 177–192.

1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238

Feldmann R.M., Chapman, R.E., and Hannibal, J.T., 1989. Paleotechiques: The Paleontologycal Society Special Publications, Tennesse, 4, 1–358. Fischer, P., 1885. Manuel de Conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossiles: Paris 9, 785–896. Fletcher, H.O., 1958. The Permian gastropods of New South Wales: Australian Museum Records, 24, 115–64. França, A.B., and Potter, P.E., 1988. Estratigrafia, ambiente deposicional e análise de

1239

reservatório do Grupo Itararé (Permocarbonífero), Bacia do Paraná (parte 1): Boletim de

1240

Geociências da Petrobrás, 2, 147–191.

50

1241

França, A.B., and Potter, P.E., 1991. Stratigraphy and reservoir potential of glacial deposits of

1242

Itararé Group (Carboniferous-Permian), Paraná Basin, Brazil: American Association of

1243

Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 75, 62–85.

1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250

Fredericks, G.N., 1928. Materialy dlya klassifikatsii roda Productus Sow: Izvestiia Geologicheskogo Komiteta, 46, 773–792. George, T.N., 1931. Ambocoelia Hall and certain similar British Spiriferidae. Quaterly Journal, Geological Society of London, 87, 30–61. Girty, G.H., 1904. New molluscan genera from Carboniferous. United States National Museum, Proceedings, 27, 721–736. Głuchowski E., 2002. First finding of Traumatocrinus in the Triassic of the Polish Tatra

1251

Mountains. In: Ćmiel S. (Ed.), Proceedings of 22nd Field School of Silesian University

1252

Geologists: Komisja Nauk Geologicznych Oddziału PAN w Katowicach, Sosnowiec, 38–39.

1253 1254

González, C.R., 1969. Nuevas especies de Bivalvia del Paleozoico superior del Sistema de Tepuel, Provincia de Chubut, Argentina: Ameghiniana, 6, 236–250.

1255

González, C.R., 1972. La Formación Las Salinas, Paleozoico Superior de Chubut (Argentina).

1256

Parte II. Bivalvia: Taxonomia y Paleoecología: Asociación Geológica Argentina, 27, 188–

1257

213.

1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265

González, C.R., 1994. Early Carboniferous Bivalvia from Western Argentina. Alcheringa 19: 169-185. González, C.R., 2006. Lower Permian bivalves from central Patagonia, Argentina: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 80, 130–155. González, C.R., 2010. Bivalves from the Carboniferous glacial deposits of central Patagonia, Argentina: Geologica et Palaeontologica, 43, 61–81. Gray, J.E., 1854. A revision of the arrangement of the families of bivalve shells (Conchifera): The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (series 2),13, 408–418. 51

1266

Grigorjeva, A.D., Ganelin, V.G., and Kotlyar, G.V., 1977. Semeistvo Linoproductidae. In:

1267

Sarytcheva, T.G. (Ed.), Pozdnepaleozoiskie Produktidy Sibiri I Arktiki. Akademiia Nauk

1268

SSSR, Paleontologicheskii Institut, Trudy, 136, 8–209.

1269

Guerra-Sommer, M., Cazzulo-Klepzig, M., Santos, J.O.S., Hartmann, L.A., Ketzer, J.M., and

1270

Formoso, M. L.L., 2008a. Radiometric age determination of tonsteins and stratigraphic

1271

constraints for the Lower Permian coal succession in southern Paraná Basin, Brazil:

1272

International Journal of Coal Geology, 74, 13–27.

1273

Guerra-Sommer, M., Cazzulo-Klepzig, M., Menegat, Rualdo, Formoso, M.L.L., Basei, M.A.S.,

1274

Barboza, E.G., and Simas, M.W., 2008b. Geochronological data from Faxinal coal

1275

succession in Southern Paraná Basin: a preliminary approach combining radiometric U/Pb

1276

age and palynostratigraphy: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 25, 246–256.

1277 1278 1279 1280 1281

Harper, D.A.T., and Moran, R., 1997. Fossils explained 20: brachiopod life styles. Geology Today, 13, 235–238. He, W., Shi, G.R., Feng, Q., and Peng, Y., 2007. Discovery of late Changhsingian (latest Permian) brachiopod Attenuatella species from South China: Alcheringa, 31, 271–284. He, W., Shi, G.R., Zhang, Y., Yang, T., Teng, F., and Wu, S., 2012. Systematics and

1282

palaeoecology of Changhsingian (Late Permian) Ambocoeliidae brachiopods from South

1283

China and implications for the end-Permian mass extinction: Alcheringa 36, 515–530.

1284

Holz, M., Souza, P.A., and Ianuzzi, R., 2008. Sequence stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the

1285

Late Carboniferous to Early Permian glacial succession (Itararé Subgroup) at the eastern-

1286

southeastern margin of the Paraná Basin, Brazil: Geological Society of America Special

1287

Paper, 441, 115–129.

1288

Holz, M., França, A.B., Souza, P.A., Iannuzzi, R., and Rohn, R., 2010. A stratigraphic chart of

1289

the Late Carboniferous/Permian succession of the eastern border of the Paraná Basin, Brazil,

1290

South America: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 29, 381–399. 52

1291 1292

IPT, 1981, Carta Geológica do Estado de São Paulo. Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas, , scale 1: 500.000.

1293

Jin, Y., and Sun, D., 1981. Palaeozoic brachiopods from Xizang: Palaeontology of Xizang, Book

1294

III, The Series of the scientific expedition to the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, Science Press,

1295

127–176.

1296 1297

Kidwell, S.M., Fürsich, F.T, and Aigner T., 1986. Conceptual framework for the analysis of fossil concentrations: Palaios, 1, 228–238.

1298

King, W., 1865. Remarks on the histology of two specimens of Rhynchopora geinitziana, De

1299

Verneuil, from near the River Oukhta, Province of Archangel, and belonging to the

1300

Collection of the Corps of Mines of St. Petersburg: The Annals and Magazine of Natural

1301

History, 16, 124–128.

1302 1303 1304 1305

Knight, J.B., 1956. New families of Gastropoda: Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 46, 41–42. Kozlowski, R., 1914. Les brachiopodes du Carbonifere superieur de Bolivie: Annales de Paleontologie, 9, 1–100.

1306

Kuhn, O., 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. 326 pp. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.

1307

Kumpera, O., Prantl, F., and Rozicka, B., 1960. Revision of the Nuculidae from the Ostrova-

1308

Karvina District (Pelecypoda). Sbornik Narodniho Musea v Praze: Acta Musei Nationalis

1309

Pragae, 16B, 17–83.

1310

Landis, C.A., and Waterhouse, J.B., 1966. Discovery of Permian Fossils in the Eglinton

1311

Volcanics, Southland: Royal Society of New Zealand (Geology), Transactions (Earth

1312

Sciences), 4, 139–146.

1313 1314

Lech, R.R., and Milana, J.P., 2006. Nuevos registros de moluscos carboníferos en la sierra del Tontal, Precordillera de San Juan: Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 61, 57–62.

53

1315 1316 1317

Le Menn, J., 1987. Growth pattems and evolutionary trends o f Devonian crinoid columns. Lyon: Geobios, 20, 811–829. Le Menn, J. 1988. Equinodermes du Givetien et du Frasnien du Boulonnais (France). In: D.

1318

Brice (ed.) Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Université de Bretagne

1319

Occidentale, Collection Biostratigraphie du Paleozoïque, 7, 455–477.

1320

Li, W., Shi, G.R., Yarinpil, A., He, W., and Shen, S., 2012. Cancrinella and Costatumulus

1321

(Brachiopoda) from the Permian of South Mongolia and South China: Their morphology,

1322

biostratigraphy and distribution: Geobios, 45, 297–309.

1323

Llewellyn, G., and Messing, C.G., 1993. Local variations in modern crinoid−rich carbonate bank

1324

margin sediments: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23, A344.

1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338

Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Regnum animale: 824 pp., edition 10, Estocolmo. Loczy, I., 1964. Problemas da estratigrafia e paleogeografia carbonífera da Bacia do Paraná: Boletim da Divisão de Geologia e Mineralogia, DNPM, 214, 1–113. McCoy, F., 1844. A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous limestone fossils of Ireland: 207 pp., Dublin. McCoy, F., 1851. Description of some new Mountain Limestone fossils: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 167–175. Meek, F.B., and Worthen, A.H., 1866. Descriptions of invertebrates from the Carboniferous System: Illinois Geological Survey, 2, 145–411. Mendes, J.C., 1952. Fáunula permo-carbonífera marinha de Capivari: Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras, Universidade de São Paulo, 134, Geologia, 7, 1–18. Mezzalira, S., 1956. Novas ocorrências de camadas marinhas permo-carboníferas no Estado de São Paulo: Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, 5, 61–69.

54

1339 1340 1341 1342

Mezzalira, S., 1966. Os fósseis do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Instituto Geográfico e Geológico, Boletim, 45, 1-132. Mezzalira, S., 1989. Os fósseis do Estado de São Paulo: Instituto Geológico, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Estado de São Paulo, Série Pesquisa, 1-142.

1343

Milani, E. J., 1997. Evolução Tectono-estratigráfica da Bacia do Paraná e seu Relacionamento

1344

com a Geodinâmica Fanerozóica do Gondwana Sul-ocidental. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade

1345

Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. [in Portuguese].

1346 1347

Milani, E.J., Melo, J.H.G., Souza, P.A., Fernandes, L.A., and França, A.B., 2007. Bacia do Paraná: Boletim de Geociências da Petrobrás, 15, 265–287.

1348

Miller, J.S., 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or lily-shaped Animals, with observations

1349

on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites. Bryan & Co., Bristol: 150 p.

1350

Miller, S.A., 1877. The American Palaeozoic fossils, a catalogue of the genera and species:

1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358

Cincinnati, 253 p. Miller, S.A., 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology: Cincinnati, Ohio, Western Methodist Book Concern Press, 793 p. Mineropar., 2007. Mapeamento geológico da folha de Ponta Grossa. Governo do Estado do Paraná, scale 1:100.000. Moore, R.C.; Jeffords, R.M., and Miller, T.H., 1968. Morphological features of crinoid columns. The University of Kansas Contributions, 8, 1–30. Morris, N.J., Dickins, J.M., and Astafieva-Urbaitis, K., 1991. Upper Paleozoic

1359

Anomalodesmatan Bivalvia. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology),

1360

47, 51–100.

1361 1362

Muir-Wood, H.M., 1955. A history of the classification of the phylum Brachiopoda: British Museum (Natural History), London, 124 p.

55

1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368

Muir-Wood, H.M., 1962. On the Morphology and Classification of the Brachiopod Suborder Chonetoidea: British Museum (Natural History), London, 132 p. Muir-Wood, H.M., and Cooper, G.A., 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Memoir of the Geological Society of America, v. 81, p. 1–447. Nalivkin, 1979. Brakhiopody turneiskogo Iarusa Urala (Brachiopods of the Tournaisian of the Urals): Nauka, Leningrad, 248 p.

1369

Neves, J.P., Anelli, L.E., Pagani, M.A., and Simões, M.G., 2014a. Late Palaeozoic South

1370

American pectinids revised: biostratigraphical and palaeogeographical implications:

1371

Alcheringa, 38, 281–295.

1372

Neves, J.P., Anelli, L.E., and Simões, M.G., 2014b. Early Permian post-glacial bivalve faunas of

1373

the Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, Brazil: paleoecology and biocorrelations with South

1374

American intraplate basins: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 52, 203–233.

1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386

Newell, N.D., 1938. Late Paleozoic pelecypods: Pectinacea. University of Kansas State Geological Survey. Kansas, 10, 1–123. Newell, N.D., and Boyd, D.W., 1990. Nacre in a Carboniferous pectinoid mollusc and a new subfamily Limipectininae: American Museum Novitates, 2970, 1–7. Newell, N.D., and Boyd, D.W., 1995. Pectinoid bivalves of the Permian–Triassic crisis: American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 227, 1–95. Newell, N.D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, T.G., 1953. Upper Paleozoic of Peru: Geological Society of America, Memoir (Boulder), 58, 1–276. Oliveira, E.P., 1930. Fósseis marinhos na Série Itararé no Estado de Santa Catarina: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2, 17–21. Oliveira, E.P., 1936. Um novo braquiópode da Serie Itararé: Notas Preliminares e Estudos, Divisão de Geologia e Mineralogia, 5, 8–10.

56

1387

Paeckelmann, W., 1930. Die Fauna des deutschen Unterkarbons. 1. Teil. Die Brachipoden, 1.

1388

Teil: Die Orthiden, Strophomeniden und Choneten des mittleren und oberen Unterkarbons:

1389

Koenigliche-Preussiche geologische Landesanstalt, Abhandlungen (Berlin), 122, 143–326.

1390

Pagani, M.A., 2004. Los bivalvos carboníferos y pérmicos de Patagonia (Chubut, Argentina).

1391

Parte II: Familias Malletidae, Polidevciidae, Myalinidae e Inoceramidae: Ameghiniana, 41,

1392

271–288.

1393

Pagani, M.A., 2006. Los bivalvos carboníferos y pérmicos de Patagonia (Chubut, Argentina).

1394

Parte IV: Familias Aviculopectinidae, Deltopectinidae y Schizodidae: Ameghiniana, 43,

1395

461–476.

1396 1397 1398

Pelseneer, P., 1889. Sur la classification phylogenetique des pelecypodes: Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 20, 27–52. Petri, S., and Souza, P.A., 1993. Síntese dos conhecimentos e novas concepções sobre a

1399

bioestratigrafia do Subgrupo Itararé, Bacia do Paraná, Brasil: Revista do Instituto Geológico,

1400

14, 7–18.

1401

Petri, S., Mendonça, C.A., Bologna, M.S., Coutinho, J.M.V., Vieira, P.C., and Botelho, P.F.,

1402

1996. Correlação estratigráfica de poços para a captação de água subterrânea na região de

1403

Capivari/Rafard, SP: descrições litológicas, macroscópicas, microscópicas e perfis

1404

geofísicos: Revista Brasileira de Geociências, 26, 25–34.

1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410

Prendergast, K.L., 1943. Permian productinae and Strophalosiinae of Western Australia: Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 28, 1–73. Racheboeuf, P.R., 2000. The stratigraphic value of Devonian Chonetoidean and Productoidean brachiopods: Courrier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 220, 83–85. Rocha-Campos, A.C., 1966. Novas ocorrências de fósseis marinhos no Grupo Tubarão em São Paulo e Santa Catarina: Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, 15, 5–13.

57

1411

Rocha-Campos, A.C., 1967. The Tubarão Group in the Brazilian portion of Paraná Basin. In:

1412

Bigarella, J.J., Becker, R.D., and Pinto, I.D.(Eds.), Problems in Brazilian Gondwana

1413

Geology, Curitiba, 27–102.

1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423

Rocha-Campos, A.C., 1969. Moluscos e braquiópodes Eogondvânicos do Brasil e Argentina. Full Professor thesis, Universidade de São Paulo. [in Portuguese]. Rocha-Campos, A.C., 1970. Upper Paleozoic bivalves and gastropods of Brazil and Argentina, a review: II Gondwana Symposium, South Africa, Abstracts, 605–614. Rocha-Campos, A.C., and Rösler, O., 1978. Late Paleozoic faunal and floral successions in the Paraná Basin, southern Brazil: Boletim IG-USP, Série Científica, 9, 1–16. Rocha-Campos, A.C., Santos, P.R., and Canuto, J.R., 2008. Late Paleozoic glacial deposits of Brazil: Paraná Basin: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 441, 97–114. Saad, A.R., 1977. Estratigrafia do Subgrupo Itararé no Centro e sul do Estado de São Paulo. Master thesis, Universidade de São Paulo. [in Portuguese].

1424

Sabatini, N., and Noirat, S., 1969. Algunos gastropoda de las superfamilias Euomphalacea,

1425

Pleurotomariacea y Platyceratacea del Paleozoico Superior de Argentina: Ameghiniana, 6,

1426

174–178.

1427 1428

Salvini-Plawen L., 1980. A reconsideration of systematic in the Mollusca (Phylogeny and higher classification): Malacologia, 19, 249–278.

1429

Santos, P.R., Rocha-Carnpos, A.C., and Canuto, J.R., 1996. Patterns of Late Palaeozoic

1430

deglaciation in the Paraná Basin, Brazil: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,

1431

Palaeoecology, 125, 165–184.

1432

Sarytcheva, T.G., and Sokolskaja, A.N., 1959. O klassifikatsin lozhnoporistykh brakhiopod. (On

1433

Classification of Pseudopunctate Brachiopods.). Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Doklady, Moscow,

1434

125 181–184.

58

1435

Savage, N.M., Manceñido, M.O., Owen, E.F., Carlson, S.J., Grant, R.E., Dagys, A.S., and Sun,

1436

D.L., 2002. Rhynchonellida. In: Kaesler, R.L. (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology,

1437

Part H, Brachiopoda 4 (revised): Geological Society of America and University of Kansas

1438

Press, 1027–1376.

1439

Scheffler, S.M., Fonseca, V.M.M., and Fernandes, A.C.S., 2015. New crinoids from the

1440

Maecuru Formation (Middle Eifelian; Amazon Basin, State of Pará, Brazil): Geobios, 48,

1441

57–69.

1442

Schneider, R.L., Mühlman, H., Tommasi, E., Medeiros, R.A.A., Daemon, R.F., and Nogueira,

1443

A.A., 1974. Revisão estratigráfica da Bacia do Paraná: XXVIII Congresso Brasileiro de

1444

Geologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, Porto Alegre, 41–65.

1445

Shen, S., Archbold, N.W., Shi, G.R., and Chen, Z.Q., 2000. Permian brachiopods from the

1446

Selong Xishan Section Xizang (Tibet), China. Part 1: stratigraphy, Strophomenida,

1447

Productida and Rhynchonellida: Geobios, 33, 725–752.

1448 1449 1450

Shi, G.R., and Waterhouse, J.B., 1991. Early Permian brachiopods from Perak, west Malaysia: Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, 6, 25–39. Shi, G. R., and Waterhouse, J. B., 1996. Lower Permian Brachiopods and Molluscs from the

1451

Upper Jungle Creek Formation, Northern Yukon Territory, Canada: Geological Survey of

1452

Canada, Bulletin, 424, 1–241.

1453

Shi, G.R, and Waterhouse, J.B., 2010. Late Palaeozoic global changes affecting high-latitude

1454

environments and biotas: an introduction: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,

1455

Palaeoecology, 298, 1–16.

1456

Simões, M.G., Rocha-Campos, A.C., and Anelli, L.E., 1998. Paleoecology and evolution of

1457

Permian bivalve faunas (Paraná Basin), in Brazil. In: Johnston, P.A., and Haggart,

1458

J.W.(Eds.), Bivalves: An Eon of evolution: Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D.

1459

Newell: Calgary University Press, 443–452. 59

1460

Simões, M.G, Neves, J.P., Anelli, L.E., and Weinschütz, L.C., 2012. Permian bivalves of the

1461

Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, and their biostratigraphic significance:

1462

Boletim IG-USP, Série Científica, 12, 71–82.

1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469

Soares, P.C., 1991. Tectônica sinssedimentar cíclica na Bacia do Paraná-controles. Full Professor thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná. [in Portuguese]. Souza, P.A., 2006. Late Carboniferous palynostratigrafphy of the Itararé Subgroup, northeastern Paraná Basin, Brazil: Review of Palaeobotany and Palylonogy, 138, 9–29. Souza, P.A., and Callegari, L.M., 2004. An Early Permian palynoflora from the Itararé Subgroup, Paraná Basin, Brazil: Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 36, 439–450. Souza, P.A., and Marques-Toigo, M., 2005. Progress on the palynostratigraphy of the Permian

1470

strata in Rio Grande do Sul State, Paraná Basin, Brazil: Anais da Academia Brasileira de

1471

Ciências, 77, 353–365.

1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481

Stanley, S.M., 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir, 125, 1–296. Stanley, S.M., 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve mollusks. Journal of Paleontology, 46, 165–212. Stehli, F.G., 1954. Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 105, 257–358. Sterren, A.F., 2004. Bivalvos pérmicos de la Formación Tupe em la quebrada La Herradura: Ameghiniana, 41, 57–74. Taboada, A.C., 1989. La fauna de la Formación El Paso, Carbónico inferior de la precordillera sanjuanina: Acta Geológica Lilloana, 17, 113–129.

1482

Taboada, A.C., Mory, A., Shi, G.R., and Pinilla, K., 2015. The Early Permian brachiopod fauna

1483

from Pasminco BW 9 borehole (Calytrix Formation) on the Barbwire Terrace, Canning

1484

Basin, Western Australia: Alcheringa, 39, 207–223. 60

1485

Taboada, A.C., Neves, J.P., Weinschütz, L.C., Pagani, M.A., and Simões, M.G., 2016.

1486

Eurydesma–Lyonia fauna (Early Permian) from the Itararé group, Paraná Basin (Brazil): a

1487

paleobiogeographic W–E trans-Gondwanan marine connection: Palaeogeography,

1488

Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 449, 431–454.

1489

Tedesco, J., Cagliari, J. Chemale Junior, F., Girelli, T., and Lana, C., 2019. Provenance and

1490

paleogeography of the Southern Paraná Basin: Geochemistry and U–Pb zircon

1491

geochronology of the Carboniferous-Permian transition: Sedimentary Geology, on-line,

1492

doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.105539

1493

Verneuil, E. de, 1845. Paléontologie, mollusques, brachiopodes. In: Murchison, R. I., Verneuil,

1494

E., and Keyserling, A. (Eds.), Géologie de la Russie d’Europe et des Montagnes de l’Oural 2,

1495

Part 3: London, Paris, p. 17–395.

1496

Vesely, F.F., and Assine, M.L., 2006. Deglaciation sequences in the Permo-Carboniferous Itararé

1497

Group, Paraná Basin, southern Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 22, 1–156.

1498

Waagen, W., 1883. Salt Range Fossils. Productus-Limestone Fossils: Geological Survey of India,

1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504

Memoirs, Palaeontologia Indica, 2, 39–546. Waterhouse, J.B., 1964. Permian brachiopods of New Zealand: New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 35, 1–285. Waterhouse, J.B., 1975. New Permian and Triassic brachiopod taxa: Department of Geology of the University of Queensland papers (new series), 7, 1–23. Waterhouse, J.B., 1982a., New Zealand Permian Brachiopod Systematics, Zonation, and

1505

Paleoecology: Geological Survey of New Zealand, Palaeontological Bulletin, 48, 1–158.

1506

Waterhouse, J.B., 1982b. An early Permian cool-water fauna from pebbly mudstones in south

1507 1508 1509

Thailand: Geological Magazine, 119, 337–432. Waterhouse, J.B., 1983a. New Permian invertebrate genera from the East Australian segment of Gondwana: Indian Geologists’ Association, Bulletin, 16, 153–158. 61

1510

Waterhouse, J.B., 1983b. Permian Brachiopods from Pija Member, Senja Formation, in Manang

1511

District of Nepal, with new brachiopod genera and species from other regions: Indian

1512

Geologists' Association, Bulletin, 16, 111-151.

1513

Waterhouse, J. B., 1986. Late Palaeozoic Scyphozoa and Brachiopoda (Inarticulata,

1514

Strophomenida, Productida and Rhynchonellida) from the southeast Bowen Basin, Australia:

1515

Palaeontographica, Abt. A, 193, 1–76.

1516

Waterhouse, J. B., 2001. Late Paleozoic Brachiopoda and Mollusca from Wairaki Downs, New

1517

Zealand.With notes on Scyphozoa and Triassic ammonoids and new classifications of

1518

Linoproductoidea (Brachiopoda) and Pectinida (Bivalvia): Earthwise, 3, 1–195.

1519 1520

Waterhouse, J.B., 2008. Aspects of the evolutionary records for fossils of the bivalve subclass Pteriomorphia Beurlen: Earthwise, 8, 1–220.

1521

Waterhouse, J.B., 2010. New Late Paleozoic Brachipod and Molluscs: Earthwise, 9, 1–134.

1522

Waterhouse, J.B., 2013. The Evolution and Classification of Productida (Brachiopoda):

1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528

Earthwise, 10, 1–535. Wenz, W. 1938. Gastropoda, Teil I. In: Schindewolf, O.H. (Ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Verlag Gebrüder Bornträger, 1639 p. White, I.C., 1908. Relatório sobre as Coal Measures e rochas associadas ao sul do Brasil: Comissão das Minas de Carvão de Pedra do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 300 p. Williams, A., Carlson, S.J., Brunton, C.H.C., Holmer, L.E., and Popov, L.E., 1996. A supra-

1529

ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda: Philosophical transaction of the Royal Society of

1530

London (series B), 351, 1171–1193.

1531

Zambito, J., and Schemm-Gregory, M., 2013. Revised taxonomy and autecology for the

1532

brachiopod genus Ambocoelia in the Middle and Late Devonian northern Appalachian Basin

1533

(USA): Journal of Paleontology, 87, 277–288.

1534 62

1535

Captions

1536 1537

Figure 1. Stratigraphic chart of Itararé Group showing the main marine mudstone intercalations

1538

and their lateral correlations. Capivari assemblage (= Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage

1539

here described). Araçoiaba, Ortigueira and Mafra assemblages are recorded in thin marine

1540

intercalations in a thick sandstone package. Explanation: LPTS, Late Paleozoic Third Order

1541

Sequence; SB, Sequence Boundary; ass., Assemblage. Modified from Holz et al. (2010) and

1542

Taboada et al. (2016).

1543 1544

Figure 2. A: Distribution of the upper Paleozoic strata (Itararé Group) in the Paraná Basin,

1545

southeastern Brazil and location of the studied section (Capivari marine beds). The location of

1546

the Passinho and Lontras marine beds, southern Brazil, is also indicated. B: Geological map with

1547

the distribution of the upper Paleozoic rocks in the studied area (black star). Source of data: IPT

1548

(1981).

1549 1550

Figure 3. Columnar section of the upper portion of the Itararé Group, Taciba Formation, in the

1551

Capivari region, State of São Paulo, Brazil. The fossil-bearing interval is highlighted.

1552

Abbreviations: C=clay; S = silt; FS = fine sand; MS= medium sand; CS= coarse sand. A: Pebbly

1553

mudstone in the upper portion of the section. B: Fossil-bearing silty shale. C: Sample of

1554

laminated siltstone with rich concentrations of fragmented plant material. Scale bars 1 cm.

1555 1556

Figure 4.

1557

Brachiopods of the Taciba Formation, Capivari county. 1-12: Rhynchopora grossopunctata

1558

Mendes, 1952. 1: conjugated valves, ventral valve view, GP/1T 117a; 2: dorsal valve, GP/1E-

1559

451; 3-5: ventral valves; 3: GP/1E 117c; 4: GP/1E-2507; 5: GP/1E-2545; 6, 11: conjugated 63

1560

valves, GP/1E-4342; 6: dorsal valve view; 11: posterior view; 7: cast of external mold of dorsal

1561

valve, GP/1E-4405; 8: ventral valve, GP/1E-443a; 9, 10, 14, 15: dorsal valves, GP/1E-4325; 9:

1562

dorsal valve view; 10: anterior view; 14: lateral view; 15: posterior view; 12: external mold of

1563

ventral valve, GP/1T 117b; 13: detail of the ventral valve of GP/1E 443b, showing punctae

1564

(5/mm2); 16-25: Biconvexiella saopauloensis sp. nov., 16-19: dorsal valves; 16: cast of GP/1E-

1565

4339 (holotype); 17: natural mold; 18: GP/1E-453; 19: GP/1E 450; 20: external mold of ventral

1566

valve, GP/1E 4322; 21, 22: GP/1E 2513; 21: conjugated valves; 22: close-up of the

1567

subconcentric rows of spine bases; 23: cast of external mold of dorsal valve, GP/1E-4327; 24-25:

1568

ventral valve, 24: GP/1E 2520; 25: GP/1E-4338. 26-28: Quinquenella rionegrensis (Oliveira), 26:

1569

dorsal valve, GP/1E 4355c; 27-28: dorsal valve interior, 27: GP/1E-4354c; 28: GP/1E 4358; 29-

1570

32: Lyonia rochacamposi Taboada et al., 2016; 29: ventral valve in oblique view, GP/1E-4350b;

1571

30: CP.I 769I, specimen from Bela Vista do Sul locality (Southern Brazil), showing a single row

1572

of spines (white arrow); 31: cast of a fragmentary ventral valve, external mold, GP/1E 4350b; 32:

1573

fragmentary ventral valve, external mold, GP/1E 4350a. Scale bar = 10 mm, except in 19; 20;

1574

26-28 = 5 mm. Specimens 2, 6, 11-13; 20-22, 26 are external molds. 3-5; 8-10, 14-19, 24, 25 are

1575

internal molds.

1576 1577

Figure 5.

1578

Bivalves of the Taciba Formation, Capivari county. 1-4: Phestia tepuelensis, 1-3: GP/1E-452; 1:

1579

external mold of right valve; 2: latex cast of 1; 3: detail of 1, showing the radial ribs crossing the

1580

commarginal costae; 4: internal mold of right valve, GP/1E-455. 5-7: Streblopteria aff.

1581

lagunensis, GP/1E-457, internal mold of right valve; 5: dorsal view; 6: antero-posterior view. 7:

1582

right valve view; 8-10: Limipecten capivariensis (Mendes), 8: latex cast of left valve fragment,

1583

GP/1T-116; 9: cast of external mold of right valve, GP/1E 2494; 10: internal mold of

64

1584

undetermined valve, GP/1E 2511; 11-12: Praeundulomya cf. subelongata Dickins, GP/1E-4252;

1585

11: right valve view; 12: ventral margin view. Scale bar = 10 mm, except in 9 and 10 = 5 mm.

1586 1587 1588

Figure 6. Gastropod and crinoid remains of the Taciba Formation, Capivari county. 1-3:

1589

Gastropods, 1-2: Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp. 1: latex cast of external mold ,GP/1E 4348

1590

(holotype); 2: cast of external mold, GP/1E-4319; 3: Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp., GP/1E-454;

1591

4-6: øPentaridica sp. (personal communication Dr. Julio Hlebszevitsch, April 2016); 4: Articular

1592

facet showing the peripheral crenularium [L2]GP/1E-4321; 5: Detail of a pluricolumn, GP/1E-

1593

4349A; 6: two articular facets with well-preserved peripheral crenularium, GP/1E-4349. Scale

1594

bar = 5 mm.

1595 1596

Figure 7. Sedimentary facies relationships of the Taciba Formation, Capivari County, State of

1597

São Paulo, Brazil. Note the dropstone-bearing shales in the distal areas, and the glacier melting

1598

associated with the cross-stratified sandstones intercalated with plant-rich mudstones. Members

1599

of the Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage are recorded in the upper, fossil-bearing silty

1600

shales.

1601 1602

Figure 8. Reconstruction of the hypothesized siliciclastic-dominated, low-energy, shelfal

1603

bottoms of the “Capivari sea”, during a short-lived deglacial event. Note the dominance of

1604

rhynchonelliform brachiopods, with subordinated bivalves, gastropods and crinoids. Explanation:

1605

(1) øPentaridica sp.; (2) Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp.; (3) Quinquenella rionegrensis; (4)

1606

Lyonia rochacamposi; (5) Rhynchopora grossopunctata; (6) Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp.;

65

1607

(7) Limipecten capivariensis; (8) Streblopteria aff. S. lagunensis; (9) Phestia tepuelensis and (10)

1608

Praeundulomya cf. subelongata. Illustration by J.L.C. Bezerra.

1609 1610

Table 1. Age of the Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage within the glacial succession of the

1611

Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, according to various authors.

1612 1613

Table 2- Correlation of the Itararé Group macroinvertebrate faunas, based on literature data.

1614 1615

Table 3. Faunal composition, suggested age and biocorrelation of the Biconvexiella

1616

saopauloensis assemblage, Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, State of São Paulo, Brazil.

1617 1618

Table 4. Taxonomic composition of the Biconvexiella saopauloensis marine assemblage, Taciba

1619

Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, southeastern Brazil. Explanation: *species illustrated in

1620

this contribution, but not formally described.

1621 1622

Table 5. Measurements of the brachiopod shells, Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage,

1623

Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, southeastern Brazil. Explanation: V= ventral

1624

valve; D= dorsal valve; F= fragment; C= conjugated valves.

1625 1626

Table 6. Measurements of the mollusk shells, Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage, Taciba

1627

Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, southeastern Brazil. Explanation: R= right valve; L=

1628

left valve; C= conjoined (articulated) valves; U= undetermined valve.

1629

66

1630

Table 7. Measurements of the crinoid remains, Biconvexiella saopauloensis assemblage, Taciba

1631

Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, southeastern Brazil. Explanation: *individual discs;

1632

**stem (pluricolumn).

1633 1634

Table 8. Guild diversity and abundance of the marine invertebrates, Biconvexiella saopauloensis

1635

assemblage, Taciba Formation, Itararé Group, Paraná Basin, southeastern Brazil. Guild

1636

classification based on Aberhan and Kiessling (2015).

67

Authors Itararé faunas

Rocha-Campos and Rösler (1978)

Petri and Souza (1993)

Holz et al. (2010)

Simões et al. (2012)

Neves et al. (2014b)

Taboada et al. (2016)

This study

São Paulo

Paraná

Santa Catarina

Artinskian-Kungurian

Kungurian

---

---

---

---

Itaporanga

---

Kungurian

---

---

---

---

Araçoiaba

Late Carboniferous (Stephanian)-Early Permian

Late Carboniferous (WestphalianStephanian)

---

---

---

---

---

Guaraúna

Kungurian

Artinskian

---

---

---

---

---

Ortigueira

Artinskian

Artinskian

---

---

---

---

---

Teixeira Soares

Kungurian

Artinskian

---

Late AsselianSakmarian

Asselian

Latest AsselianEarly Sakmarian

Latest AsselianEarly Sakmarian*

Artinskian-Kungurian

Artinskian

Gzelian-Asselian (C-P boundary)

---

---

---

---

Mafra

Artinskian

Artinskian

---

---

---

---

---

Bela Vista do Sul (Butiá)

Kungurian

Kungurian

---

Late AsselianSakmarian

Late AsselianEarly Sakmarian

Late AsselianEarly Sakmarian

Latest AsselianEarly Sakmarian*

Capivari

Lontras

Latest AsselianEarly Sakmarian

Faunas São Paulo Studies

Capivari

Hortolândia

Mezzalira (1956) Loczy (1964) Rocha-Campos (1969)

X

Paraná Guaraúna

Santa Catarina Ortigueira

Bela Vista do Sul

Itaporanga

Teixeira Soares

X

X

X

X

X

Mafra

X

Saad (1977)

X

X

Rocha-Campos & Rösler (1978)

X

X X

Canuto (1985)

X X

Simões et al. (2012)

Lontras

Rio Grande do Sul

X

X X

Budó

Capivari Marine Invertebrate Fauna Authors

Fossils

Age

Correlation

Barbosa and Almeida (1949a, b) Ambocoelia planoconvexa; Rhynchopora; Aviculopecten sp. gastropods

-------------

Late Paleozoic deposits from Bolivia and Amazon Basin, Brazil

Mendes (1952)

Crurithyris aff. planoconvexa; Rhynchopora grossopunctata Aviculopecten capivariensis; Nuculana ? sp.

Late Carboniferous /Permian

Teixeira Saores, Bela Vista do Sul and Bagé marine beds (=Taciba Formation), Paraná Basin, and Barreal beds, Argentina

Barbosa and Gomes (1958)

RochaCampos (1966)

Peruvispira delicata -------------

Early Pennsylvanian

-------------

Early Permian

Copacabana Formation, Peru

RochaCampos (1967)

as in RochaCampos (1966)

-------------

-------------

RochaCampos (1969) Attenuatella paulistana sp. nov. (nom. nud.) Limipecten capivariensis (nom. nud.);

Older than Teixeira Soares marine fauna (middle portion of the Itararé Group)

Teixeira Soares marine bed (=Taciba Formation), Paraná Basin, Brazil

Saad (1977)

Attenuatella sp.; Rhynchopora grossopunctata Limipecten capivariensis (nom. nud.); Phestia sp.; Streblopteria sp.; Peruvispira delicata; crinoids

Artinskian

Hortolândia shale fauna, Paraná Basin, Brazil

Rocha-Campos and Rösler (1978) Attenuatella sp. nov.; Rhynchopora grossopunctata Phestia sp.; Streblopteria sp.; Peruvispira delicata crinoids

Early Permian (middle portion of the Itararé Group)

Hortolândia shale fauna, Paraná Basin, Brazil

Petri and Souza (1993)

-------------

Artinskian

Teixeira Soares marine bed (=Taciba Formation), Paraná Basin, Brazil

This study

Phestia tepuelensis Streblopteria aff. lagunensis Limipecten capivariensis Praeundulomya cf. subelongata Peruvispira brasiliensis n. sp. Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp. Lyonia rochacamposi Rhynchopora grossopunctata Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp. Quinquenella rionegrensis Pentaridica sp.

Latest Asselian-Earliest Sakmarian

Uppermost part of the Taciba Formation (Teixeira Soares and Butiá assemblages)

Bivalvia

Gastropoda

Brachiopoda

Crinoidea

Family

Species

Studied specimens 2

Polidevciidae

Phestia tepuelensis

Streblochondriidae

Streblopteria aff. lagunensis

1

Limipectinidae

Limipecten capivariensis

3

Sanguinolitidae

Praeundulomya cf. subelongata

1

Eotomariidae

Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp.

2

Gosseletinidae

Mourlonia (Woolnoughia)? sp.*

1

Auriculispinidae

Lyonia rochacamposi

2

Rhynchoporidae

Rhynchopora grossopunctata

20

Ambocoeliidae

Biconvexiella saopauloensis n. sp.

86

Rugosochonetidae

Quinquenella rionegrensis

7

øPentacauliscidae

Pentaridica sp.

25

Measurements (mm) Width

Length

Thickness

GP/1E-4342 (C)

19

16

4

GP/1E-443a (V)

14

15

-

GP/1E-443b (V)

~17

~15

-

GP/1E-2507 (V)

~14

~12

-

GP/1E-2545 (V)

~16

~18

~3

GP/1E-451 (D)

18

16

-

GP/1E-1912 (D)

17

~16

-

GP/1E-4325 (D)

14

~13

9

GP/1E-4405 (D)

13

14

-

GP/1E-2527 (V)

~7

~6

-

GP/1E-2504 (V)

~10

9

4

GP/1E-4338 (V)

~6

9

~2

GP/1E-2520 (V)

9

~9

5

GP/1E-4354b (V)

8

9

4

Biconvexiella saopauloensis

GP/1E-4327 (D)

10

8

-

sp. nov

GP/1E-2543 (D)

10

9

-

GP/1E-2538 (D)

~11

~8

-

GP/1E-453 (D)

11

9

-

GP/1E-4339 (D)

11

9

-

GP/1E-2513 (D)

~11

8

-

GP/1E-4358 (D)

5

9

-

GP/1E-459 (V)

10

9

-

GP/1E-4354c (D)

11

8

-

GP/1E-4350a (V)

~13

~22

-

GP/1E-4350b (F)

~35

~26

-

GP/1E-4351a (F)

~31

~15

-

Species

Rhynchopora grossopunctata

Quinquinella rionegrensis

Lyonia rochacamposi

Specimen (valve)

Measurements (mm)

Bivalvia

Gastropoda

Species

Specimen

Length

Height

Width

Phestia tepuelensis

GP/1E-452 (R)

21

11

---

GP/1E-455 (R)

~23

11

---

Streblopteria aff. lagunensis

GP/1E-457 (R)

~21

20

~4

Limipecten capivariensis

GP/1T-116 (L)

~8

~90

---

GP/1E-2511 (U)

~6

~9

---

GP/1E-2494 (R)

9

6

---

Praeundulomya cf. subelongata

GP/1E-5242 (C)

69

27

~13

Peruvispira brasilensis n. sp.

GP/1E-4319

5,3

7,8

---

GP/1E-4348

3,8

~4,5

---

Crinoidea

Specimen

øPentaridica sp.

GP/1E-4321

Major axis (mm) 3,5*

GP/1E-4349 A

2,5 **

GP/1E-4349 B

2,0*

GP/1E-4349 C

1,5*

GP/1E-4350C

~1,2*

Taxon Lyonia Rhynchophora Biconvexiella Quinquenella Streblopteria Limipecten Phestia Praeundulomya

Mourlonia (Woolnoughia) Peruvispira øPentaridica Total

Stationary lowlevel epifaunal suspension feeder 2 20 86 7 1 3 ----------119

Facultatively mobile, infaunal, deposit feeder ------------1 --------1

Facultatively mobile infaunal suspension feeder --------------2 ------2

Epifaunal grazer ----------------1 2 3

Stationary upperlevel epifaunal suspension feeder --------------------25 25

Asselian

Pennsylvanian

303.4 +/- 0.9

Kasimovian 307.2 +/- 1.0

Moscovian 311.7 +/- 1.1

Bashkirian 318.1 +/- 1.3

Itararé Group

298.9 +/- 0.1

Gzheian

Late Carboniferous

Taciba Fm.

EurydesmaLyonia fauna

295.0 +/- 0.1

Tubarão Supergroup

Permian

Cisuralian

Sakmarian

MAH

subzone*

São Paulo Capivarí ass.

Chronostratigraphic Chart Paraná Teixeira Soares ass.

South-Southeast

Rio Grande do Sul

Santa Catarina Butiá BA ass.

Passinho Shale

Rio do Sul Formation

Budó facies

Taciba Guaraúna ass. Araçoiaba ass.

Ortigueira ass.

Sequences

Lontras ass. Mafra ass.

SB-3 Suspiro facies

Lontras shale (Carb./Permian transition)

LPTS -2 Mudstones

Campo Mourão Fm.

Campo Mourão

Sandstones Lapa/ Vila Velha incised valley fill

Lagoa Azul Fm.

Lagoa Azul

“Folhelho Roncador” transgression

Conglomerates Hiatus

SB-2

Incised valley Lithostratigraphic LPTS -1 contact 900 km SB-1 aprox. horiz. scale

Gondwana 1 Supersequence (Milani et al., 2007)

North-Northwest Geochronology Lithostratigraphy Biostratigraphy

A

B

47°30'

47°20'

N

Cuiabá Brasilia

GO

MT

5 km

700

Monte Mor 18º

MG 70

0

900

MS

23°00'

Capivari

1100 1300

1-AB-1-SP

SP

1100

ld

úc

pi

São Paulo

na enti

ad

r

ve

Arg

Ro

Ri 23°10'

ad

lto

e

N

Rio do Sul Lontras Shale

500

Atlantic Ocean 24ºS

Sa

Curitiba

t Tie

Teixeira Soares Passinho Shale

700

Ro

ri-

ar

va

Paraguay



Ca

PR

900

O

Capivari

Capivari Beds

Salto

SC

300

200 km

Brazil

RS

0

10

0

10

Paraná Basin 54º

Porto Feliz

Porto Alegre

50ºW

Basin border Isopachs (m) Itararé Group outcrop belt Exploration well

Intrusive rocks

Tatuí Fm.

Corumbataí Fm.

Itararé Group

Irati Fm.

Itu Suit

Cities Outcrop Roads

Secondary Road Rivers

25 m

A

A 20

B

B 15

C

C 10

Dark shale with dropstones

5

Shale

Flame structure Plant remains

Silt Shale

Brachiopods

Massive mudstone

Bivalves

Pebbly mudstone

Gastropods

Siltstone

Crinoids

Pebbly silty sandstone Massive sandstone Current-rippled sandstone

0

C S FS MS CS

Trough cross-stratified sandstone

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

20

19

26

25

23

21

15

22

24

30 27

28

29

31

32

1

2

4

5

3

6

t ea tr re e Ic Silty shale Cross-stratified sandstone Massive mudstone Shale with dropstones Vegetation

1

2

4

3

5

7

6

8

11

10

9

12

Simões et al., JSAES, CRediT author’s statements

Title: Mollusks and brachiopods of the Capivari Marine Bed, late Paleozoic glacial Itararé Group, northeast Paraná Basin, Brazil: paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic implications Simões Marcello: Supervision; conceptualization; writing (with input from all authors); field collecting (geological and paleontological); funding acquisition; Neves Jaqueline: General systematic analysis; data curation; writing (with input from all authors); figure design and visualization; Taboada Arturo: Conceptualization; general systematic analysis; data curation, writing (with input from all authors); Pagani Maria: General systematic analysis; data curation; writing (with input from all authors); Varejão Filipe: Field collecting (geological and paleontological) data; geological interpretations; figure design and visualization; writing (review and editing); Assine Mário: Field collecting (geological and paleontological) data; geological interpretations; writing (review and editing).