magnesia catalyst

magnesia catalyst

23 Applied Catalysis, 12 (1984) 23-34 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., _4msterdam - Printed KINETICS OF ETHYLBENZENE DEHYDROGENATION MAGNESIA ...

563KB Sizes 1 Downloads 116 Views

23

Applied Catalysis, 12 (1984) 23-34 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., _4msterdam

- Printed

KINETICS

OF ETHYLBENZENE

DEHYDROGENATION

MAGNESIA

CATALYST

G.V. SHAKHNOVICH,

OXIDATIVE

I.P. BELOMESTNYKH,

in The Netherlands

TO STYRENE

N.V. NEKRASOV,

M.M.

OVER A VANADIA/

KOSTYUKOVSKY,

and

S.L. KIPERMANa Zelinsky

Institute

Leninsky

Prospect

of Organic 47, Moscow

aTo whom corresoondence

(Received

V-334,

should

20 September

Academy

Chemistry,

of Sciences

of the USSR,

USSR.

be addressed.

1983, accepted

26 April

1984)

ABSTRACT Kinetics of vapor-phase ethylbenzene oxidative dehydrogenation have been studied at 420 to 550°C in a gradientless reactor in the presence of a vanadia/magnesia catalyst. Kinetic equations have been obtained for this reaction in the direction of styrene and CO2 formation which considers the effect of the reaction medium on the surface state of the catalyst. A process scheme is proposed. This scheme suggests that dehydrogenation involves the interaction of adsorbed ethylbenzene with lattice oxygen whereas the ion-radicals of oxygen adsorbed on the catalyst surface are active in the total oxidation.

INTRODUCTION Although

the development

ethylbenzene kinetics

of catalysts

is the subject

of this reaction

ics of simultaneously

of a number

[l-4], while

occurring

for the oxidative

no studies

reactions

dehydrogenation

of

only a few of them discuss

of papers,

have been reported

of ethylbenzene

oxidative

the

on the kinetdehydrogenat-

ion and total oxidation. This paper deals with

the kinetic

behaviour

of both oxidative

and total oxidation

reactions

over a vanadia/magnesia

ion of the reaction

mechanism

is based on the data obtained

gation.

These

rogenation

include

[I], and their further

as the observation

EXPERIMENTAL Reaction

the intermediate

regarding

products

transformation

the oxygen

species

dehydrogenation

catalyst

[S]. The descript-

in the earlier

of ethylbenzene into carbon

oxidative

oxides

on the vanadia

investidehyd-

[6] as well

catalysts

[7,8].

METHODS kinetics

were

studied

in a small volume

gradientless

pulsating

reactor

c91. The products bons and oxygen

were analysed containing

by chromatography

compounds

UV-spectrophotometer

(Specord

0166-9834/84/$03.00

@ 1984 Elsevier

while

UV VIS). Science

for the concentration

the aqueous

COz,CO, Publishers

methane, B.V.

of hydrocar-

layer was analysed ethylene

on a

and oxygen

were

24 G hdd

iii

\_

0.5,

0

_

=

y

0

a

01

0.4 0.2 0.3

I 0.2 0.1

i

0.02

0.1

0‘ 01

::-

FIGURE (0)

1

Variations

deposited

20

carbon

the gaseous

(styrene

characterized

oxide,

residual

by oxidizing

benzaldehyde,

by the constants

corresponding

moisture

out using a sample

and zinc nitrate.

content

dried and activated

CO

- x2

and oxygen-containing

acetophenone) to those

reported

in the literature.

of a zinc oxide modified by impregnating

After drying,

com-

used in this paper were

the resulting

of about 40 to 50%) was extruded,

in an air stream

of products

them to CO2.

styrene

(92% MgO, 7% V205 and l?, ZnO) prepared vanadate

- x, (e),

In some runs the amount

components.

phenol,

nesia catalyst with ammonium

to styrene

with time at 500°C and VC8U,,, = 220 h- i; .

pure ethylbenzene,

All runs were carried

mill)

60

were determined

The chromatographically pounds

50

of ethylbenzene

- G m)

reaction

on the catalyst

40

30

of conversion

and of deposited

found among

IO

vanadia/magmagnesia paste

the granules

for two hours at 18O"C,

(with

were

two hours at 35O"C,

and 3 hours at 500 to 550°C. Specific catalyst surface determined from nitrogen adsorption by the BET method 3 -1 2 -1 , g , the pore volume (measured by mercury porosimetry) was 0.7 cm p was 100m n the pore radius was predominantly 200 - 500 A. In order uted with

to maintain

quartz

with quartz Whether

isothermal

homogeneous

the catalyst

by returning

at 5OO"C,

volume

was dil-

was also filled

oxidation.

activity

to the conditions

lyst was reactivated

the bed, the catalyst

along

ratio of 1:2. The free reactor

in a volume

to avoid

conditions

was constant

accepted

each series

after

as standard.

first by air/stream

Between

mixture

of runs was checked

the runs, the cata-

for 10 minutes

and

then by air for one hour. Initial conversion

(PO) and current to styrene

and w 2, respectively, coefficient

(x,) and carbon the accumulation

$), and selectivity

of the reaction

RESULTS

(P) partial

products

after

pressures

dioxide

of the components,

(x2). their

rate w2 being

(S) were calculated drawing

ethylbenzene

accumulation

calculated

from the analytical

up the material

rates

considering

(w, the

results

balance.

AND DISCUSSION

The experimental

conditions

were as follows:

temperature

range 420 to 55O"C,

25

X 0.2

FIGURE

2

Effect

accumulation 52O"C,

of ethylbenzene

rates at various

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

conversion

on styrene

- w, (a) and CO2 - w2 (b)

temperatures:

(1) 46O"C,

(2) 48O"C,

(3) 5OO"C,

(4)

(5) 55O'C.

a)

w,.106(mol/gej

b)

W2.106(mo1/gj~ w,.106(aol/gs)

I.4 ml 0.6

3.0

FIGURE (0)

3

Influence

and CO2 (V)

starting

7.0

space

rates;

(Pc8hlo

of styrene

5OO"C,

velocities

(a) and oxygen

a grain

size of 0.25-0.5

reactor

was gradientless.

mixture

diluted

with

(b) on styrene

190 to 1100 h-', initial

(VQ+,~)

partial

) 4.2 to 11.2 kPa, oxygen (PE,) 4.4 to 9.6 kPa, compounds

added

reaction

and carbon

kPa, 0.2 to 0.5 kPa and up to 1.0 kPa, respectively, lyst with

9.0

x = 0.4.

kPa, those of specially

oxygen-containing

2.0

I.0

t,.o(kPa)

pressures

accumulation

10.0-80.0

(P&,h8),

6.0

of partial

of ethylbenzene

(Pi20)

styrene

5.0

ethylbenzene

pressures steam

4.0

to 2-3 mm. Under

Most of the kinetic

steam since carbon

products,

dioxide

over

(P&J~)

1.3 to 6.2

1 to 5 ml of the cata-

these conditions,

runs were carried

deposition

namely

the pulsating

out with reaction

on the catalyst

was negligible

in this case. In the absence these amounts

of the catalysts

were considered

The experiments rate of ethylbenzene

ethylbenzene

in calculating

with varying demonstrated

grain

conversion

the reaction

size and linear

the absence

did not exceed

velocity

of inhibition

89 and

rates. at a constant

effects

flow

due to volume

26

0.2

0.1

FIGURE

4

46O'C

Dependence

(0).

FIGURE

5

480°C

0.4

of ethylbenzene

(o,,

Conversion

in the gas phase.

0.3

5OO'C

520°C

and selectivity

(v).

550'C

as the function conditions:

0.7

0.6

conversion

(n,,

to styrene

Experimental

0.5

on temperature;

(A).

of time in the absence -1 . VC8H,o = 600 h

of oxygen

5OO'C,

and pore diffusion. Figure

1 shows the experimental

beainning

of the run, conversion

CO2 tends

to increase

results to styrene

with progressively

on testing

higher

is 0.5 h or below even at low ethylbenzene

Steady

state will

of time without Liquid

more

to

The relaxation

space velocities will function

made up at least 908 of the total

for the main fraction (benzene

x-phenylethyl

and the catalyst

In the

conversion

(100 to 200 h-l). for a long period

reactivation.

products

destruction

stability.

while

coke formation.

period

then be reached

catalyst

tends to decline

alcohol

of the liquid and toluene)

products.

and mild oxidation

and acetophenone)

conversion.

In addition

were detected

Styrene

the products

(styrene

oxide,

accounts

of oxidative

benzaldehyde,

in small quantities

(not

than 3";).

The aqueous ethylbenzene)

condensate

contains

and the gaseous

only phenol

products

eratures, CO (up to 1%). The product -1 or less based on carbon. g

contain

deposited

(not more than 0.02"1 based on CO2 (up to 12':) and, at higher on the catalyst

amounted

temp-

to 0.5 mg

The complete

analysis

ing over this catalyst to styrene

and, to a negligible

resulting

in the formation

ducts tend to proceed Figures2a

curves"

ial mixture

The increasing creases

slightly

oxidation

styrene

accumulation

rate remains

on the catalyst position

tends

on the catalyst not represent

virtually

presented

scheme in Figure

ivity is independent

catalyst

[II].

ii1 1lly5,

3a) decreases

of

by at

into the init-

w, values

contribution

compounds

rate becomes

and in-

of styrene

The oxygen-containing

are added

considerably

the same, and the amount

lower,

of products

compounds

compounds

suggests

CO2

deposited

undergo

decom-

their occurrence

and that their further

with ethylbenzene of ethylbenzene

reaction

of temperature

conversions

(styreneproceeds

conversion

process

indicates

can

scheme

it was earl-

to parallel-

on selectivity with a possible

of the reaction

is presented

rate of styrene

is comparablewiththatobtained

that the energies

select-

of acti-

are similar.

in the course

formation

rate decreased

over this

on Figure

5. Only styrene

is equal

to 3.8 10m6 mol

in the presence

formation

C mixture

according

of conversion

pathways

of gas phase oxygen Initial

14

[IZ]. The fact that the reaction

possibly

in its different

of ethylbenzene

of oxygen

dramatically

(6.2 10e6 mol

due to reduct-

ions.

When performing urrence

reaction

The data on the effect

at 4 kPa 02). Styrene

9

slopes

inhibited

dioxide

the

in this case.

4 also point to a parallel

in this case.

g-' s-',which

The concave

is possibly

due to a greater

drops

in small quantities

of consecutive

in the absence

is formed

(Figure

of the oxygen-containing

for the reaction

The change

against

slow steps of the process.

contribution

vation

pro-

conditions.

ier shown that total oxidation

minor

[IO]).

(up to 2":) oxygen-containing

On the basis of experiments

consecutive

curves'

pressure

the main

to increase.

surface

oxidation

products

of up to IO' carbon

selectivity

under the reaction

A high reactivity

the reactions

and incomplete

that the reaction

of w2 probably

quantities mixture,

reaction;

rates of the reaction

("conversion

partial

the values

When even minor

occurr-

of ethylbenzene

the rates of the two reactions.

rate. The process

into the starting

destruction

The addition

does not affect

that the reactions

dehydrogenation

lower rates.

indicate

least one of the products.

showed

total oxidation

of oxidative

with still

conversion

"conversion

products oxidative

extent,

and 2b show accumulation

total ethylbenzene these

of the reaction

are predominantly

a kinetic

of the following

analysis,

account

was taken of the simultaneous

occ-

reactions:

I.

C6H5C2H5

+ 0.5 O2 = C6H5C2H3

II.

C6H5C2H5

t 10.5 O2 = 8 CO2 + 5 H20

III.

C6H5C2H3

t 10 02 = 8 CO2 + H20

+ H20 (I)

Since the styrene lation

is subject

to further

in the experiment

conversions,

are expressed

I, II and III,

and rIII in the directions

rI' rII

w1 =r

formed

rates measured

in terms

the product

accumu-

of reaction

rates,

respectively,

by the equations

I - rIII

w2 = rII + rIII w=r

(2)

I + rII

where w = w

+ w - ethylbenzene consumption rate. 12 An increase in current partial oxygen pressures

actions

I-III.

rations

in the reaction

It is seen from Figure mixture

3b, however,

lead to higher

results

in higher

that enhanced

rates of w

while

2

rates of re-

oxygen

concent-

w, values

chanoe

less markedly. A rise of initial most experiments

partial

ethylbenzene

were carried

pressures

out) at a constant

above

oxygen

8-10 kPa (at which

values

and steam to ethylbenzene

ratios

Go2 =

’ H20 = p"H20'P~8H10

P"c2'Poz8H,0'

does not result catalyst

in the increase

is completely

An attempt variable

to linearize

reaction

ful. That

covered

mixture

indicates

The stationary

on the catalyst

form as follows

that probably

the temperature

dependence

composition

activity

yield

molecules,

a nonpower

value.

indicates

of reaction

in the Arrhenius

from of the kinetic

level of the catalyst

ably lower than the initial mixture

of styrene by reacting

equation

was unsuccess-

[13].

to styrene

formation

This may be due to the action

and the kinetic

rates at an in-

coordinates

equation

that the

is consider-

of the reaction

can be expressed

in the general

[14]

w = f (Pi) m (Pj)

where ponent

(3)

f and q are functions partial

pressures

ion of its activity The equation ed (Table

fied scheme to styrene catalyst

the dependence

for the constant

under the influence

catalyst

routes

implies

to directions

is based on the assumption proceeds

lattice.

according

to redox

This mechanism

proceeds I-III

that conversion reaction

follows

rate on com-

and for the variat-

medium,

from a proposed

that the reaction

corresponding

of reaction

composition

of the reaction

of this type can be obtained

1). The scheme

stoichiometric

representing

respectively.

process

scheme

in three

(equations

propos-

independent

1). This simpli-

of ethylbenzene

mechanism

involving

from the experimental

oxygen

results

of the

which

showed

29

TABLE

1

Process

scheme

for ethylbenzene

oxidative

dehydrogenation

Step

Stoichiometric

Nos.

Steps

numbers following

1

02+z”=z’o*-

2

Z’02_ t Z”

3

z'o- + Z"

4

C8H,g

=

zz’o-

the routes

T

yr

0.5

10.5

10

0.5

0.5

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

= Z'O2_ + Z'

t Z' = C8H,0Z' 2-

for steps

_.I

5

C8H,0Z'

+ Z'O

6

C8H8Z"

= c*v* + Z”

7

C8H,&

+ Z'O2

8

C8H,000Z'

9

C8H80Z'

+ Z'O2

= C7H80Z'

+ CO2 + Z"

0

1

0

10

C7H80Z'

+ Z'O2

= C7H6OZ'

+ H20 + Z'O

0

1

0

11

C8H8 + Z' = C8H8Z'

0

0

1

12

C8H8Z'

0

0

1

13

C8H800Z'

0

0

i

14

C8H60Z'

t Z'O2 = C7H60Z'

0

0

I

15

C7H60Z'

+ Z'O

0

1

1

16

C6H6Z'

+ 22'02-

0

1

1

17

C5H40Z'+

0

1

1

18

C4H40Z'

19

= C8H8Z"

+ H20 + Z"

= C8H,000Z'

= C8H80Z'

+ Z'O2

+ Z"

+ H20

= C6H6Z'

Z'02

+ Z"

+ H20

= C8H800Z'

= C8H60Z'

1

+ CO2 + Z" + CO2 + Z"

= C5H40Z' = C4H40Z'

+ H20 + CO2 + 22" t CO2 t Z"

+ Z'02

= C4H403Z'

+ Z"

0

1

1

C4H403Z'

+ Z'O

= C4H203Z'

+ H20 + Z"

0

1

1

20

C4H203Z'

+ 2Z'02

= X02

+ C2H202Z'

0

1

1

21

C2H202Z'

+ Z'02

+ Z'O

= 2C02 + H20 + 32"

0

1

1

22

H20 t 7' = Z'H20

0

0

0

where

Z' - active Z"

center

containing

- active center containing

+ Z'O- + Z"

an oxidated a reduced

vanadium vanadium

ion (V5'); ion (V4').

30 the possibility the absence

of ethylbenzene

of oxygen

data 1151 which

in the gas phase,

point to the presence

Similar

mechanisms

carbons

are postulated

radical

forms of oxygen,

The assumption formed

for the oxidative in 116,171.

is supported

ium, or under favorable of

the catalyst

scheme,

steps

being accompanied

by a change

presence

vapour

of water

of hydrocarbons

11). An interaction

forms of oxyqen

for the initiation

oxidation

1) that carbon

dioxide

with the reaction

of active

ion-

reaction.

adsorbed

is med-

ion-radical

l-3 correspond to the appearance of ion-radical 2as 0 to the catalyst lattice, this process

reoxidation

of adsorbed

state of the vanadium

ethylbenzene

of adsorbed

styrene

ions. The

the V 4+ z V5+ interconversions,

may be assumed

on the centers

by the interaction

containing

to proceed rapidly. Ad5+ . a V ion (steps 4 and

with the lattice oxygen (step 5) 4+ ions. The formation and water and V

of ethylbenzene

and styrene

with

ion-radical

(steps 7-10 and 12-21).

5, 7 and 12 are taken to be slow and irreversible;

the other

steps are

to be fast.

Let us now express

the reaction

of the reaction

medium

(stoichiometric

numbers

rI

(Figure

surface. of hydro-

that the adsorbed

has been contacted

in the oxidative

occurs

in the formation

of CO2 is caused

taken

and total oxidation

suqqested

in

by the spectroscopic

in the total

is known 1191 to favour

so that the steps of catalyst

Steps

dehydrogenation

by the observation

oxygen species and oxygen return

results

it is also supported

of Vst and V4+ ions on the catalyst

The mechanisms

conditions

over this catalyst

oxygen [183.

In the suggested

sorption

dehydropenation

02 and Cl-, are involved

only some time after

species

oxidative

=r

=

5

rates for routes

I-III,

neqlecting

in terms of the rates

on the catalyst,

of these steps for each other

the effect

of steps 5, 7 and

route are equal

12

to zero):

k; -‘C8H,0~02 M2O

rII

k;PC8H,0P02

=r

7 M

(5)

') LU

ki 2~C8Hg002 = r12 =

rIII

where

M = z aiPi,Pi

adsorption

- the fugacities

coefficients

on the most

k; and ki2 - rate constants adsorption Polanyi

coefficients

relation

of components reactive

for steps

between

containing

the reaction

styrene

and oxygen,

the activation

this coefficient

proceeds

in the adsorbed

sites of the catalyst

5, 7 and 12, respectively,

of ethylbenzene,

coefficient

step [20] or a factor In our case,

(6)

M2=

most

probably

energy

layer;

ai -

surface; including

ki, also

and CL - Brbnsted-

and heat effect

of the

(1 2 3 2 0). at complete

coverage

of the

catalyst erence

surface.

between

erent meaning

(4)-(6)

of the constants

Depending steady

In equations

on the surface

states

u is forma lly equal

react ions on the uniform

and nonun iform

of Z' and Z"

1 respectively, z" '

centers.

and their

is reduced

to diff-

[Zl].

concentrations

of ethylbenzene

tend to set in on the surface

concentration

to unity and the diff-

surface

These

invariable

which

and oxygen

are characterized

concentrations

different

by different

are denoted

total concentrations

L, that

as lz, and is

lz' + lz" = L

(7)

Once each of these stationary centers

and oxidation

ibrium with

where

respectively,

From equations

1z’

=

1

would

the reduction

by the lattice

be equal,

oxygen

rate of Z'

(which

is in equil-

that is

0.5 , = i*Po z II 2

z~, and y2 are permanent

ation,

is established,

centers

the gas phase oxygen)

1 "

xlpC H 810

states

rate of Z"

values

of the catalyst

(7) and

containing

constants

of reduction

and reoxid-

surface.

(8) we obtain

(9)

Pc8Hl 0 +X p A

“2 where

Y, = x,/x2

Since the bimolecular

interaction

of surface

steps the rates of each step in the eauations While

I:, enters

variations considered.

the expressions

in the reaction

is assumed

for the rates of these steps,

mixture

It is therefore

components

(4)-(5) are proportional

composition

possible

according

to express

factor

in the slow to I:,.

its changes

to equation

due to

(9) were not

: (Pj) in equation

(3) as

follows:

o (Pj)

=

1 +

[ where

k - proportionality

ponding

x

(IO)

1

Pc8H,0 2 0.5

p0* coefficient

which

is further

introduced

into the corres-

constants.

Considering

adsorption

equilibria

in steps

1-4, 11 and 22 and substituting,

corresponding

partial

the expressions with regard

pressures

for styrene

to the effect

kIPC8H,0 w, =

Pcoa5 2

for fugacities

of the surface

and CO2 accumulation

of the reaction

system

layer, we obtain

rates from equations

(2) to (10)

on the catalyst:

kIIIPC8H8p02

i-

12

(’ + klPC8H,0

+ k2P

(II)

'C H 8 10 ) k3P02)(l+x C8H8 + cl.5 pO,

w2 =

(kIIPC H 810

kI

+

(' + klPC8H,0

IIpC8H,,)PO

2

+ k2PC8H8

+ k3P02)(1tx[

pc ,&‘I’31 1

po;

where

kI, kII, kIII and k

The unity

in the first

steam concentration

k3 are constants. 1' k2' parentheses of each denominator

which

is suggested

If Pc,~,,,!P~;~ <
will

least squares

In equations

of the reaction

medium

(11) and (12), instead

steady

by calculating

The calculations

in the range

of taking

the denominator

from 0 to 3; in addition

showed

kIII

. IO-* e -7'oo/T

= 6.55.10m4

= 4.55

e -7050

. lob3

k, = 2.31 . 10W5 e

that,

the experimental

powers

equal

the PO2 powers

data are best described

form with the constants

having

mol/g

/T mol/g

s kPale5

s kPa*

e -7550/Tmo1,g 6300/Tkpa-1

;

s kpa2

;

; k2 = 6.72. 10m5 e 6300/Tkpa-l;

2500 k3 = 2.62 . 10T3 e

data by

of all constants

values:

kII

can be neg-

state of the catalyst.

to were

by

each of them to zero.

ions (11) and (12) in the above

kI = 4.91

to ethylbenzene.

experimental

in the range from 0 to 3 as well as the values

means of equating

the adsorbed

on the catalyst

with a single

was specified

considers

and in excess

technique.

2, its value was varied also varied

to be constant

then proceed

The form of the equations nonlinear

(12)

2

1

'T kPa-';

x = 0.4 . IO-' kPa -Oa5.

by equat-

the following

33 The root-mean-square is 15.7',.and equal mental

to 35.6', and 39.6%, error

of about

The above model For example,

Cortes

dehydrogenation of styrene

and Seoane

oxidation

of different

postulated

be independent

investigation, ration

was

equations

proved

In the present the process

of oxygen

the adsorbed

concentrations

atoms.

to describe

in total

envisages

in the gas phase.

of reaction

as the desired

changed

and

mechanism

is suggested

of ethylbenzene

the kinetic

in [21.

and rapid oxid-

observed.

as the oxygen data by simple

oxygen

rate In our concentpower

describing

range of parameters.

that takes account in the catalyst

of the fact

lattice,

whereas

oxidation.

is governed

The equation

rates on the oxygen

equations

for a wide

the participation

ratio

the V5+/V4+

by styrene

suggests

In that case the reaction

the experimental

mechanism

the surface

participates

dependence

does not consider

Another

and this was really

and total oxidation

to a specific

mechanism

for ethylbenz-

too.

involves

states,

model

catalysts.

dehydrogenation

effect.

of oxygen

adsorption

hydrogen

work we were able to obtain

corresponds

The suggested ent oxidative

in the presence

the rates of both reactions

unsuccessful

oxygen

the experi-

both for oxidative

in this work

in oxidative

inhibitions

concentration

An attempt

that dehydrogenation

with

for other

equation

developed

forms of oxygen

the dissociative

rate to styrene

The equation

for w, and w2

they found that high concentrations

model

the styrene

adsorbed

however,

varied.

Although

of oxygen

rate, the appropriate

dehydrogenation

ation of the resultant

earlier

two site Langmuir

the same species

the kinetic

and considers

for ethylbenzene

rates for w, and w2

deviation

is in fair agreement

suggested

[I] proposed

the reaction

By contrast

the participation

would

from the models

that implies

inhibits

which

reaction

single

15':.

and total oxidation.

this phenomenon.

The authors

of the calculated (with maximum

respectively)

differs

ene dehydrooenation

total

deviation

18.4?., respectively

of vanadium

by oxygen

considers

concentration

ions in differ-

and ethylbenzene

the different

patterns

and on process

for

inhibition

product.

REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 IG 11

A. Cortes and J.L. Seoane, J. Catalysis, 34 (1974) 7. P.N. Degannes and D.M. Ruthven, Canadian 3. Chem. Eng., 57 (1979) 627. Y. Murakami, K. Iwayama, H. Uchida, T. Hattori and T. Tagawa, J. Catalysis, 71 (1981) 257. G. RUSSO, S. rrescitelli and P. Ciambelli, Chem. Ind., 55 (1973) 627. I.P. Belomestnykh, O.K. Bogdanova and G.V. Shakhnovich, A Catalyst for Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethyl Benzene to Styrene, USSR Inventor's Certificate No. 522.851, Bull. Izobr. No. 28 (1976). G.V. Isagulyants, I.P. Belomestnykh, G.V. Shakhnovich, N.N. Rozhdestvenskaya, L.L. Kovalenko and A.A. Greish, Neftekhimiya, 21 (1981) 365. P. Batist, C. Kapteijns, B. Lippens and G. Schuit, J. Catal!,sis, 7 (1967) 33. V.A. Phenin, V.A. Shvets and V.B. Kazansky, Dokl. AN SSSR. Z52 (1980) 1427. V.I. Timoshenko, R.A. Buyanov and 0.1. Proshin, Kinet. Katal., IO (1969) 681. S.G. Bashkirova and S.L. Kiperman, Kinet. Katal., 11 (1970) 631. G.V. Isagulyants, I.P. Belomestnykh, A.A. Greish, G.V. Shakhnovich and O.K.

34

12 13 14 15 16

19

20 21

Bogdanova, Neftekhimiya, 18 (1978) 34. S.L. Kiperman, Kinet. K&al., 22 (1981) 30. N.I. Koltsov and S.L. Kiperman, Journal of the Research Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido University, 26 11978) 85. G.K. Boreskov. Kinet. Katal.. 13 (1972) 543. N.S. Kozlov, i.A. Skrigan, G:V. Mdlorava, L.N. Kupcha, G.V. Shakhnovich and I.P. Belomestnykh, Izv. AN BSSR, Ser. Khim. Nauk., 1983, No. 3, p. 10. J. Hanuza, B. Jesowska-Thzebiatowska and W. Oganowski, Bull. Acad.Polon. Sci., Ser. Sci. Chim., No.11 (1977) 899. J. Haber and B. Grzybowska, J. Catalysis, 28 (1973) 489. K.N. Spiridonov arid O.V. Krylov, Problems of Kinetics and Catalysis, v.16, P.17, Nauka, Moscow, 1975. R.V. Prudnikov and V.F. Kiselev, Kinet. 1.1. Burbulavicus, Y.A. Zarifyants, Katal., 12 (1971) 258. M.I. Temkin, Advances in Catalysis a. Related Subjects, 28 (1979) 173. S.L. Kiperman, The Foundations of Chemical Kinetics. Kinetic Problems in Heterogeneous Catalysis, Chimiya, Moscow, 1979.