Membrane technology to prosper under new US water rules By Frederick
Pontius,
Pontius Water Consultants
New rules due to be introduced
Inc, Lakewood,
Colorado,
USA
Strategies
over the next several years are expected to
stimulate
further application
of membrane
technology
for drinking
water
treatment
in the USA. This article briefly outlines the rules and some of the
One or more actions
changes that they may bring about.
requirements The
The
US
Environmental
(USEPA)
is actively
Protection
preparing
formal
Agency
Membrane technologies Water
compliance
credit
options.
Under a Long Term 2 Enhanced Treatment
Rule (LT2ESWTR),
1) will apply
treatment
These “bins” have been structured
USEPA
for recovery,
Method
considering
as measured
1623 and
10
associated
the
using the
1 samples. Water
systems will have three years following classification
plants.
Cryptosporidium oocyst count,
total source water uncorrected
Surface Water
“action bins” (Table
to conventional
to meet the treatment
initial bin
requirements
with that bin. State agencies may grant
systems an additional
two-year extension to comply
when capital investments
MembraneTechnology
are necessary.
May 2002
properly
systems
addition
currently
using
to conventional for
this
membranes
treatment
technology
in bin
for each action bin. employs
a
“toolbox”
and the tools listed in Table 2, when designed
and implemented,
indicated
log credit
USEPA
will
determining
may receive towards
identified
LT2ESWTR
approach,
proposed
rules, and in some cases final rules have been set, technologies as that include membrane
from the array of strategies
in Table 2 must be used to meet the log treatment
designed
(or range
be
providing
if toolbox
receive the
of credit).
The
guidance
options
for
are properly
and implemented.
requirements. The additional bin requirement part,
on
the
treatment
plants
Enhanced
treatment table
assumption Water
achieve an average
of Cryptosporidium, The removal log,
requirements
2 log
correspond
and
2.5
to total
total
in the
1) are based,
that
in compliance
Surface
(IESWTR)
requirements
(Table
Treatment
and
Rule
log additional
reverse
LT2ESWTR
Cryptosporidium 1
substantial
of
configurations
all
ultrafiltration, osmosis toolbox,
removal
-
are
-
nanofiltration, included
in
the
and can be used to achieve credit
(2.5 logs or more)
for
C~ptosporidium. Water systems
treatment
C~ptosporidium removals
of
microfiltration,
of 3 logs removal bins with
Membrane configurations Membranes
conventional
with the Interim
for the action
4, 5 and 5.5 log, respectively.
in
treatment inactivation)
providing
(equivalent
a total of 2.5 logs of to
Bin
4
including
for C~ptosporidium in addition
to
V
v
Membrane Technology May 2002
conventional
treatment
reassessment
and A
LT2ESWTR. LT2ESWTR late 2002,
will
future
be exempt
during
under
proposal
formal
is scheduled
dominated
from
monitoring
for
to be released
with a final rule expected
wastewater
during
the
Revision
US
a nationwide
osmosis
source
is
viewed
pharmaceuticals meeting many
of the
surface
systems emerging
the systems,
as
inorganic
threats
in agricultural February
2006,
with a
arsenic
(MCL)
10 pg/L
200
reverse osmosis
microfiltration,
many
recent
Colorado
has
in
removing
contaminant,
the western
the
cost
membrane
many decreasing
organic
systems
organic
to
installed
USA.
Membranes
be
as US
develop
strategies
not
drinking
pharmaceuticals.
for
seems to
in
comply
requirements,
products,
chemicals,
trend
will
matter,
microbial
disrupting
Quality drinking Interestingly,
but
the
water
that
with
possible
best
within
resources.
Meetings
to meet
contaminants
mostly
sources,
several forms:
During
especially
dominated
in
US
to install
arsenic MCL.
Emerging
for
For
membranes
of organic organic
matter, over
very active present
and
could
as
degree
Research
the
matter,
microfiltration
be seriously
several years
on which
in
osmosis, is
membrane
effluent January
as well
is to
process
the University
certain
rules
a newly
for
provided.
level
by USEPA media
systems that
of
systems must
drinking
contaminants.
suppliers
processes,
assessing
maximum
Coagulation-assisted
the
from
as and
is in
membrane research
treatment and
importance as other
and arsenic.
such
applications.
Of
are faced
potential
source
wastewater
and
as
water
effluent-dominated In addition
few
ether
existing
many
waters.
endocrine
for
next
being considered.
of and
pharmaceuticals
Inorganic contaminant
within butyl
endocrine-disrupting
2003.
attention
of perchlorate.
March
released results
late
at certain
because
discharges.
During
during
source
the
also
those
found
2002,
in
the
stakeholder
meetings
of
contaminants The
receiving
research
includes
For more information, contact: Frederick W.
will be discuss to
candidate
the
round
150361, Lakewood, CO 80215, USA. Tel: +I 303 986
regulated.
9923, Fax: +I 303 716 7301, Email: fredpQ
contaminant
several
likely
Pontius, PE, Pontius Water Consultants Inc. PO Box
pontiuswatescom.
to
Optimization sofiware reduces whole-life membrane project costs Original equipment manufacturers and end-users
By Anthony Bennett, Specialist Technical Solutions Ltd, Keighley, West Yorkshire, UK This brief feature outlines the way in which software called Avista Advisor can be used to reduce whole-life membrane project costs.
The
software
equipment Membrane package
technologists to
optimize
prediction
can use a new sofrware their
reverse
systems
osmosis
potential
by calculating
required
chemical
dose
water
recovery
rates.
program
can
levels at optimal
systems. The
software,
membrane called
of scaling
released
specialist
Avista
Advisor.
by
Avista It
Membrane Technology May 2002
Using
independent
Technologies, allows
accurate
is
the
substantially project
costs.
product
Avista reduce
Advisor whole-life
in membrane
membrane
are involved separation which
treatment,
aimed
in a diverse applications
include
generation,
is
at
manufacturers
municipal
and range within water
desalination, oil
production
both
original
end-users
that
of membrane market
sectors
and wastewater
brewing,
power
and
general
industry.
0