Microwave spectrum and conformation of 6-thiabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane

Microwave spectrum and conformation of 6-thiabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR Microwave SPECTROSCOPY Spectrum 60, 179-187 (1976) and Conformation of 6-Thiabicyclo[3.1.O]hexane P. J. MJ~~BERG,W. M. R...

565KB Sizes 0 Downloads 47 Views

JOURNAL

OF MOLECULAR

Microwave

SPECTROSCOPY

Spectrum

60, 179-187

(1976)

and Conformation

of 6-Thiabicyclo[3.1.O]hexane

P. J. MJ~~BERG,W. M. RALOWSKI, AND S. 0. LJ~JNGGREN Department

ofPhysical

Chemistry, The Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockkolm 70, Sweden

AND J. E. B;~CKVALL Department

of Organic Chemistry, The Royal Institute of Tecknology, S-100 4# Stockholm 70, Sweden

The microwave spectrum of 6-thiabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane (cyclopentene sulfide) has been measured in the region 26,50&40,000 MHz. The experimental data are consistent with a single stable conformation. Furthermore, these data can only be satisfactorily explained by assuming that this conformation is the boat form. Rotational constants were obtained, both for the ground state and two excited vibrational states, while centrifugal distortion coefficients were obtained for the ground state and one excited vibrational state. The ground state rotational constants found were Ao = 5026.243 f 0.003 MHz, Bo = 2833.813 f 0.003 MHz, and CO = 2411.679 f 0.03 MHz. For the ground state of the molecule, the electric dipole moment components were found to be Ib[ = 1.800 f 0.012 D and 1~~1 = 1.155 f 0.024 D, yielding a total dipole moment p = 2.139 f 0.027 D. INTRODUCTION

In the last ten years much interest has been focused on the conformations and lowfrequency vibrational modes of ring molecules with four, five and six members (I-3,and references cited therein). It is considered that the conformation of these compounds is determined by a delicate balance between Baeyer or ring strain and torsional forces between adjacent hydrogen atoms. Research activity in small ring compounds has partly been concerned with some analogs of bicyclo[3.1.O]hexane. Using far infrared, Raman, and microwave spectroscopy, extensive investigations have been made of the following compounds: bicyclo[3.l.O]hexane (#-6), 3-oxabicyclo[3.1.O$exane (4, 5, 7), 6-oxabicyclo[3.1.O]hexane (5, 8, 9), and 3,6-dioxabicyclo[3.l.O]hexane (4, 5, 10). All these molecules have been found to be stable in a boatlike conformation. Furthermore, NMR (11-23) and ultraviolet (24) spectroscopic investigations as well as X-ray crystallographic structure determinations (25-27) also indicate that in bicyclo[3.1.O]hexane systems the most stable conformations are boatlike forms. Additional support of the boat form is also given by dipole moment studies (28). This study of the microwave spectrum of 6-thiabicycloC3.1.0Jhexane (cyclopentene sulfide, CFS, cf. Fig. 1) was undertaken in order to obtain direct evidence about the conformation of this molecule, and to determine its electric dipole moment. 179 Copyright

0

1976 by Academic

411 rights of reproduction

Press, Inc.

in any form reserved.

MJCiBERG EZ- ;lL.

1so

FIG. 1. The 6-thiabicyclo[3.1.O]hexane molecule. The numbering of the atoms is shown, as well as the orientation of the principal axes of the molecule.

EXPERIMENTAL First,

2-chlorocyclopentyl

Warasch

and Buess

2’,4’-dinitrophenyl

(29)by reacting

sulfide

cyclopentene

chloride in glacial acetic acid. The m.p. was found to be Then, 2-chlorocyclopentyl2’,4’-dinitrophenyl in methanol.

was prepared

according

to

and 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfenyl

7%79°C [Ref. (30), 76..5-78"C].

sulfide was treated with sodium methoxide

This yielded CPS, as described in Ref.

(31). The substance was purified

by vacuum distillation. The microwave spectrum was obtained with a Hewlett-Packard wave spectrometer modulation

equipped with a phase-stabilized

at 33.33 kHz. The measurements

40,000 MHz) at room temperature The Stark

effect was measured

Model 8460A micro-

source oscillator

and with Stark

were made in the R-band region (26,500-

and at pressures ranging from 20 to 60 mTorr. using the J =

2 ---f 3 ground state line of carbonyl

sulfide as a standard to calibrate the waveguide spacing of the Stark cell. However, the ground state J = 1 -+ 2 transition was used when checking the consistency of the calculated

values of the dipole moment components

in the K-band

region as described

below. The dipole moment of OCS was assumed to be 0.71521 D (32). These calibrations were done at each voltage setting used in the experimental measurements. In order to minimize drift, they were repeated

each day that measurements

with as little delay as possible between calibration

were made,

and measurement.

MICROWAVE SPECTRUM AND ROTATIONAL CONSTANTS CPS is an asymmetric

rotor with the asymmetry

parameter

K

=

-

0.677. Due to the

low absolute value of K, no band structures were obtained in the spectrum. Owing to the symmetry of the molecule the dipole moment components must lie along the a and c principal axes. At room temperature, the spectrum shows the ground state transitions accompanied by two vibrational satellites. These are presumably due to the ring-bending (ringpuckering) motion. As anticipated, the spectrum is dominated by strong cc,, R-branch transitions together with quite strong pc, Q-branch transitions. However, some quite

6THIABICYCLO

[3.1 .O] HEXANE

181

weak cc,, R-branch and pa, Q-branch transitions are also present. The P,, R-branch transitions show strong Stark-lobes and they could be straightforwardly assigned from preliminary calculations assuming a boatlike conformation. Then, by assigning some isolated Q-branch lines the rotational constant A could be more accurately determined. After this, all rotational transitions could be readily identified, including transitions with high quantum numbers (up to J = 37). Table I shows the measured frequencies and assignments of the lines used in fitting by the method of least squares. The rotational constants were determined from the data by using a Watson first-order centrifugal distortion analysis (33). Table II lists the resulting rotational constants and centrifugal distortion coefficients. Table I and II also lists the lines and rotational constants of two vibrational satellites. In the case of the second vibrational satellite, it was not possible to find a strong enough Q-branch line. The rotational constants of this satellite are accordingly much less accurate than those of the other. The centrifugal distortion coefficients of the second satellite were poorly determined too, so they are not recorded here. It is characteristic of the spectrum that the u-type R-branch lines of the satellites are located on the lowfrequency side of the corresponding ground state lines while all c-type Q-branch lines are on the high-frequency side. The vibrational satellites have two notable features. First, there is a slight deviation from a linear dependence of the rotational constants on the vibrational quantum number. This indicates an anharmonic ring-puckering vibrational potential. Second, the dependence of the rotational constants on the vibrational quantum number of this low-frequency mode is very similar in the four analogous molecules studied so far (7,9,10). [N o vr‘b ra t’ronal satellite was observed in the case of bicyclo[3.l.O]hexane (6)]. The change in the constant A is positive and relatively small, while B and C exhibit negative changes of the order 7-14 MHz for each vibrational state. These facts indicate that the vibrational motion is similar in these molecules. The assumption that the motion is of a ring-puckering nature is supported by the far infrared (4, 8) and Raman (5) spectroscopic investigations. An estimate was made of the intensity ratio of the first vibrational satellite to the ground state. It yielded a value of 0.31. This corresponds to an energy difference slightly above 240 cm-l. Although the spectrum of CPS was searched carefully, no transitions were identified that could be assigned to another conformation. Both the chair and boat forms of the molecule would be expected to have nearly the same total dipole moment (although the relative magnitude of the a and c components would differ, of course), and calculations for both forms predict a rich spectrum in the R-band region. If two ring conformations do indeed exist, it thus appears likely that the energy separation between them must be greater than approximately 400 cm-‘. (Because of the Boltzmann factor, conformations with higher energy would hardly be detectable by microwave spectroscopy). The remaining unassigned lines are probably high J transitions arising either from the ground or from excited vibrational states. STARK EFFECT AND DIPOLE MOMENT

Of all R-branch transitions with low J-values in the R-band region none exhibited pure second-order Stark shifts for fields up to 2000 V/cm. Furthermore, many of these

M JijBERG

182

Rotational Constants

Transition for

the

Frequencies

Ground

State,

(in the

ET AL.

MHz)

1) =

I

Used State

in

Der1vlng

and

the

Rotationai

il =

2

State

cf

6-Thiabicyclo~3.1.Olhexane

Ground obs

43,2 43.1 51,4 5

+ +

23'413

52:3 60,6 '1.6

'2,2 32,l 41.3

26990.81

42,2

+

50,5

+

51,5

61,5

+. 51.4 +

52,4

+

63,4

+

53.3

+

53.2

64,3

+

=4,2

65,2

+

55,1

70.7

+

60,6

71.7

+

61,6

'2,6

+

62,5

157,9

+

156,9

167,10

+

166,10

"6,ll

+

"5,13

v=2 obs-talc

33118.12

-0.05

32878.32

0.02

32944.64

0

27002.98

0.02

30118.52

0.04

29873.42

-0.05

32170.46

-0.02

32076.24

31226.75

0.01

52,3

63.3

a=1 obs

-0.02

,

+

62,5 62,4

State obs-talc

30014.77

-0.03

26835.68

0.12

26847.25

-0.10

29910.28

-0.09

29663.04

0.07

-0.01

31982.11

-0.05

31128.25

-0.02

31029.29

-0.01

32477.65

0.01

32385.40

0.03

0.02 31710.85

0.01

31418.14

0.01

34496.88

0.01

0.03

31569.72

31901.60

-0.0,

31806.49

0.05

31560.77

-0.01

34777.32

0.00

-0.03

0bs-ca1c

02

31666.09

34899.31

obs

34747.35

0.02

34624.69

0.00

36300.05

0.01

36184.53

-0.01

30033.10

0.08

29395.13

-0.02

29522.06

-0.07

26808.50

0.02

lines occur in rather crowded regions of the spectrum and are not suitable for Stark effect measurements. However, the lines 62,G+ 52,4 and 72,6 +- 62.6 show very well-shaped Stark lobes. The / M 1 = 2 and 3 lobes of the first of these lines were measured and used in the calculations, and SO were the 1M 1 = 3,4, and 5 lobes of the second line. Deviations from secondorder theory arise due to coupling between the nearly degenerate levels .52,4 and 52,s (by pa). The same applies to 72.6 and 71,s (by cl=). Perturbation calculations were performed in the usual manner (34) and the matrix elements of p.E were calculated according to the method described by Schwendeman (35) using a computer program originally written by M. Ribeaud of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology for calculating the necessary coefficients for the degenerate Stark effect. The dipolemoment components were determined by a least-squares fit to the measured lobes. This yielded Ip,[ = 1.800 f 0.012 D and (~~1 = 1.155 f 0.024 D. From these components

6-THIABICYCLO TABLE

I

Ground obs

"',I1

+

"6,ll

186,12

+

185,14

'67.12

+

'86,12

'87,11

+

'*6,13

"7,12

+

"6,14

I'S,12

+

"',I2

206,13

+

207,13

+

214,18

2'7,14

+

2'6,16

2'8.14

-

217,14

227,1S

-

226,17

228,15

-

227,15

238,16

+

237,16

238,15

+

237,17

248,17

+

247,17

269,18

+

266,16

"9,19

+

278,19

289,20

+

286,20

3'10,22

+

3210,23

+

3310,24 369,27 3711,27

183

(Contd.)

Transition

214,17

[3.1 .O] HEXAN’E

+ +

3'9,22

339,24

3710,27

v=2

v=1 ohs

obs-talc

obs

obs-talc

-0.02

28114.18

0.01

27619.73

-0.01

29814.32

0.00

33877.53

-0.02

33180.54

0.01

29084.89

0.00

31361.10

-0.02

32210.24

0.0,

32930.63

0.01

30872.93

0.00

29086.01

-0.02

26812.08

-0.0,

31776.87

0.03

29116.68

0.00

34267.53

0.03

329,23

369,28 +

28663.21

State obs-talc

27703.88

-0.01

27818.61

-0.01

29236.85

-0.01

30095.03

0.01

32347.84

-0.03

34299.48

0.00

34059.47

0.00

34407.34

0.00

31345.24

0.02

27811.08

0.01

29348.00

-0.02

the total dipole moment of the molecule is p = 2.139 f 0.027 D. This value is in good agreement with the dipole moment of ‘I-thiabicyclo[4.1.O]heptane (cyclohexene sulfide) which has been determined to be 2.2 f 0.4 D (36). It was desired to make a further check of the consistency of the calculated values of the dipole moment components. The Stark patterns of three additional lines in the Kband region (18,00&26,500 MHz) were therefore investigated at a Stark voltage of 1013 V/cm. These measurements were performed on the [MI = 1 and 2 lobes of the line 41,3+ 31,2, an the (Ml = 2 and 3 lobes of 40,4t 30,3 and on the /MI = 1, 2, 3, and 4 lobes of 51.6 +- 41,4. Calculations were made using the determined values of the dipole moment components. The results fit the measured frequencies of all these Stark components within the limits of experimental error. CONFORMATION

OF THE MOLECULE

It is obvious that the three measured rotational constants of the ground vibrational state of CPS are insufficient for a detailed determination of the molecular structure.

MJiiBERG ET .4L

184

Rotational

Constants

the Ground

State

and

v=2 mng-Fuckerlng

given

for the

rrlncipal

(MHz),

hloments cf

of 6-Thia~icyclo(3.1.Ol"exane, Centrifugal

States.

Ground

State

and

the

Distortion

(a.m.u.

A*)

ds for the

Coefficients

for

c=l are

o=l State

state

Ground

Inertia as well

0=2

“=I

A

5026.243

+

5028.605

+ 0.005

5029.13

r 1.09

B

2833.813

f 0.003

2826.677

r 0.006

2818.981

* 0.076

c

2411.679

+ 0.003

2402.598

k 0.008

2394.374

c 0.075

I:

-

0.003

- 0.677016

0.677090

- 0.677687

100.54747

!. 0.00006

100.50024

t 0.00010

100.490

t 0.022

178.33781

+ 0.00019

178.7880

2 0.0004

179.276

+ 0.005

209.55359

+ 0.00026

210.3456

r 0.0007

211.068

t 0.007

465

c 36

-363

f

1081

+ 38

26.8 260

6.Y

6

442 +

83

- 384 r

66

960 t 230

t

0.3

k

9

27?

4

288 + 108

Molecular

Parameters

Assumed

Constants

of 6-Thiabicyclo[3

in Calculating

Cl - C2

1.513

A

1.530

A

c1 - c5

1.47,

A

Cl - s

1.819

A

c, - H

1.082

A

1.092

A

=

c3-11

104.6O

L C2-C3‘Cq L H-C2-H

=

a The

groups

CH2

L H-C3-H

rrng

spectively).

The

the vector

109.47O

at C2 and

the adjacent

unit

Rotational

.l.O lhexane

C2 - C3

c2 - H

the

angle C,-H

C3 share (i C,-C2-C3

bond

a

a comr~on bisector and i C2-C3-C4

is selected

with re-

so as to lie along

(;, _c + zC _c + zC _S), where 12 15 1 vector along sow particular bond.

; denotes

a

GTHIABICYCLO

[3.1 .O] HEXANE

TABLE

Dependence

of Various

Calculated C,-S-C5

Dipole

Angle

on the Moment

Bisector

T

<

Calculated

Dihedral

is Assumed

for 6-Thia-

Angles to

lie

w and along

60°

MHz

(too large)

T = 600

- 7o"

Neither

of

!l,/u, toO

A. B or

C

large

If *.

B and

c fit

fits

A > 5280 a = 25O

- 35O

7. The the

in the Episulfide

A > 5380 u, < 2S"

I”

constants

bicyclo[3.l.Olhexane

18.5

MHZ

(too large!

A fits quite well,

B and

, > 7o"

> 0.92 uo'u* (too large)

C fit well

A > 5140 a$ > 35O

MHz

(too large)

A fits well,

B > 2950

MHZ

B and

C > 2500

MHz

not

C do

fit

(too large)

However, starting from reasonable molecular parameters some significant qualitative results can be deduced. Table III shows the molecular parameters that were initially assumed. The remaining parameters consist of the angle cp = lSO”-i$ (ClC&,C,)-(C&&J with positive values corresponding to a boat conformation and the angle T = ISO’-& (C1C&Y4C6)-(C1SC6). As has been previously pointed out (lo), the quantity Ab = I, f I, - I& depends only on the atomic masses and the perpendicular distances of the atoms from the symmetry plane containing the a and c axes of the molecule. Thus, Ab is almost independent of the angles cpand T. The C-C&., angle and the distance C1<6 were chosen to reproduce this value of da. A shorter C1-Cs distance than 1.471 I%was considered unlikeIy, and a larger value resulted in a questionably small value of the C&-Cp angle. For this reason the Cr-Cb distance was kept at 1.471 A, even though a slightly larger value is possible. The values of the C&C-C4 angle and the C+Zs distance shown in Table III are the actual values obtained from this kind of first fit. It was found that the calculated rotational constants are quite insensitive to reasonable variations of the parameters listed in Table III. On the other hand, they are much more sensitive to the angles (o and 7. An estimate of the conformation of the molecule is thus possible. The dependence of the rotational constants on the dihedral angles cp and 7 was then investigated. The results of the calculations are best presented in a table. Table IV shows the results obtained for different intervals of the angles cp and 7. Almost irrespective of the value of ‘p, we find that T < 60” yields A-values which are too high and 7 > 70” along yields (P~/LC&,I~ too large if the dipole moment is assumed to lie approximately the ClSC, angle bisector in the episulfide. Finally, for T = 60”-70” the constants B and C fit very well and the constants A fits the measured values fairly well for cp = 30°.

186

M JiiBERG

ET a.1L.

5200

!

. -60'

-30"

0"

30"

60"

SO"

-30'

0'

30'

60'

SO'

>

'p

2700

4

!

-60'

+

‘+'

FIG. 2. Calculated rotational constants in MHz plotted versus the dihedral angle q. The horizontal dashed lines correspond to the values of the observed rotational constants. Negative dihedral angles correspond to a chair conformation, while positive angles correspond to a boat conformation.

The derivative of A with respect to cpis rather small in this range of cp, so this constant is less suitable for a determination of cp. Figure 2 shows how A, B, and C depend on cp for r = 67.4”. This value of T was chosen by analogy with similar systems. In the region of r = 60”-70”, the value of (pc/&aic is 0.74-0.93 for cp = 2.5”-3.5” The deviation from the observed value (0.642) may be explained by assuming a deviation between the direction of the dipole moment and the direction of the Cr.SC6 angle bisector in the episulfide. Such a deviation is actually to be expected from the fact that the dipole moment of bicyclo[3.l.O]h exane has been found to be 0.192 D (6). Furthermore, this contribution should almost coincide with the c axis of CPS. For r > 70”, however, the value of (&~(&i~ deviates so strongly from the observed value that it cannot be explained by such small contributions. We may thus conclude that the boat form of the molecule is the most stable conformation of the ring. The angle cp will be around 30” and the angle r around 60” to 70”. As pointed out by various authors (e.g., 4, 7, 9) the low energy of the boat conformation is obviously due to the fact that the hydrogen atom on carbon-l (or 5) is staggered with respect to the hydrogen atoms on carbon-2 (or 4). In a chair conformation, the latter hydrogen atoms would assume eclipsed positions.

6-THIABICYCLO

[3.1.0]

HEXANE

187

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by NFR, the Swedish Natural Science Research Council. Part of the equipment was donated by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. Two of the authors (P. J. M. and J. E. B.) would like to express their appreciation to the W. Roos foundation for scholarship grants.

RECEIVED: October 2. 1975 REFERENCES 1. V. W. LAURIE, Accounts Chem. Res. 3,331 (1970). 2. C. S. BLACKWELLANDR. C. LORD, in “Vibrational Spectra and Structure” (J. R. Durig, Ed.), Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972. 3. J. LAANE, in “Vibrational Spectra and Structure” (J. R. Durig, Ed.), Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972. 4. R. C. LORD ANDT. B. MALLOY, JR., J. ikfol. Spec~rosc. 46, 358 (1973). 5. J. D. LEWIS, J. LAANE, ANDT. B. MALLOY, JR., J. Chem. Phys. 61, 2342 (1974). 6. R. L. COOKANDT. B. MALLOY, JR., J. Amer. Che-m.Sot. 96, 1703 (1974). 7. T. B. MALLOY, JR., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 49, 432 (1974). 8. L. A. CARREIRAAND R. C. LORD, J. Chew Phys. 51, 2735 (1969). 9. W. J. LAFFERTY,J. Mol. Spectrosc. 36, 84 (1970). 10. R. A. CRESWELLANDW. J. LAFFERTY,J. Mol. Spectrosc. 46, 371 (1973). 11. M. S. BERGQ~ISTANDT. NORIN, Ark. Kemi 22, 137 (1964). 12. K. TORI, Chem. Pharm. Bull. Tokyo 12, 1439 (1964). 13. P. K. FREEMAN,F. A. RAYMOND,AND M. F. GROSTIC,J. Org. Chem. 30, 771 (1965). 14. S. WINSTEIN, E. C. FRIEDRICH,R. BAKER, AND Y. LIN, Tetrahedron Suppl. 8, Part II, 621 (1966). 15. H. E. S~IITH,J. C. D. BRAND, E. H. MASSEY, ANDL. J. DURHAM,J. Org. Chew. 31, 690 (1966). 16. A. DIEFFENBACHER ANDW. VONPHILIPSBORN,Helv. Chim. Acta 49,897 (1966). 17. Y. LIN, Thesis, University of California, 1967. 18. W. G. DAUBENAND W. T. WIPKE, J. Org. Chem. 32, 2977 (1967). 19. S. P. ACHARYA,H. C. BROWN,A. SUZUKI,S. NOZAWA,ANJIM. ITOH, J. Org. Chem. 34,301s (1969). 20. W. VON E. DOERINGANDE. K. G. SMITH, T&ah&cm 27, 200.5 (1971). 21. T. NORIN, S. STRBYBERG,ANDM. WEBER, Acta Chem. Stand. 27, 1579 (1973). 22. M. A. COOPER,C. M. HOLDEN,P. LOFTUS,ANDD. WHITTAKER,J. C. S. Perkin II, 665 (1973). 23. R. J. ABRAHAM,C. M. HOLDEN,P. LOFTIJS,ANDD. WHITTAKER,Org. Magn. Resonance 6,184 (1974). 24. R. T. GRAY ANDH. E. SMITH, Tetrahedron 23,4229 (1967). 2.5. A. F. CA-RON, G. FERGUSON,AND J. M. ROBERTSON,J. Chem. Sot. B, 692 (1969). 26. M. F. GROSTIC,D. J. DUCHAMP,AND C. G. CHIDESTER,J. Org. Chem. 36,2929 (1971). 27. F. H. HERBSTEINANDH. REGEV, J. Chem. Sot. B, 1696 (1971). 28. J. J. MCCULLOUGH,H. B. HENBEST,R. J. BISHOP,G. M. GLOVER,AM) L. E. SUTTON,J. Chem. SOC., 5496 (1965). 29. N. KHARASCHAND C. M. BUESS, J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 71,2724 (1949). 30. F. W. BOLLINGER,F. N. HAYES, AND S. SIEGEL,J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 75, 1729 (1953). 31. D. R. DOGG ANDN. C. DANN, Int. J. Sulfur Chem. 1, 117 (1971). 32. J. S. MUENTER,J. Chem. Phys. 48,4X4 (1968). 33. J. K. G. WATSON,J. Chem. Phys. 45, 1360 (1966). 34. S. GOLDENAND E. B. WILSON, JR., J. Chem. Phys. 16, 669 (1948). 35. R. H. SCHWENDEMAN, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 7, 280 (1961). 36. R. KEWLEY, Can. J. Chem. 51, 529 (1973).