:evlew :evie~ |
82
TRENDS in Cell Biology Vo1.11 No.ll November 2001
Mouse models for multistep tumorigenesis Xuemei Wu and Pier Paolo Pandolfi The mouse is an ideal model system for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of human cancer. The generation of transgenic and gene-knockout mice has been instrumental in determining the role of major determinants in this process, such as oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. In the past few years, modeling cancer in the mouse has increased in its complexity, allowing in vivo dissection of the fundamental concepts underlying cooperative oncogenesis in various tumor types. In this review, we discuss how this transition has been facilitated, providing relevant examples. We also review how, in the post-genome era, novel methodologies will further accelerate the study of multi-step tumorigenesis in the mouse.
A TRENDS Guide to
Cancer Biology
]
It is widely accepted that tumorigenesis is a multistep
are crucial to the development of distinct forms of cancer.
process that involves a series of genetic and epigenetic
Mutation or loss of these genes has highly penetrant pheuo-
alterations, such as activation of dominantly acting onco-
typic consequences, and germline mutations of these genes
genes and inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes. These
predispose the carriers to tumor development. However,
mutations accumulate in the cells and change their be-
the study of cancer genetics in humans has certain limi-
havior from normal growth to unrestrained growth and
tations. For the sporadic forms of cancer in particular,
eventually lead to invasion into surrounding tissue a n d / o r
tumor susceptibility in each individual is determined not
metastasis. This multiple-stage process is reflected by a
only by these key players but also by several modifier genes
range of observations, including clinical, epidemiological
whose activity might also have a key influence on cancer
and laboratory experiments. The process can be extremely
development. The diversity in genetic background and
complex. For example, during the development of col-
the difficulty in tumor and tissue procurement make it
orectal carcinoma, it has been proposed that at least seven
difficult to study tumorigenesis in humans for the pur-
sequential genetic alterations occur, including mutation of
pose of identifying weak tumor determinants. By con-
the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor-suppressor
trast, the mouse offers several distinct advantages and has
gene, mutation of Ki-ras and loss of fnnctional p53 gene / .
proved to be a valuable model system for the study of
These sequential mutations of key growth-regulatory genes
multistep tumorigenesis at two distinct levels: (i) identi-
Xuemei Wu Pier Paolo Pandolfi*
in the somatic cells and their progeny are generally re-
fication of novel genes involved in cancer pathogenesis;
garded as 'multiple-hits' in a broader interpretation of the
and (ii) experimental in viv0 assessment of the role of
Molecular Biology Program,
original Knudson 'two-hits' theory, which was based on
genetic hits in multistep tumorigenesis.
Dept of Pathology,
a statistical analysis of the relationship between age and
Memorial Sloan-Kettering
incidence of retinoblastoma 2.
Mice with a controlled genetic background can be raised easily in vast colonies, facilitating the analysis of
Cancer Center, 1275 York
Over the past decade, our genetic understanding of
cancer-relevant genes in tumor development, particularly
Avenue, New York,
tumor development has been greatly enhanced by the
the low-penetrance genes. The large number of inbred
NY 10021, USA.
direct study of h u m a n cancer. Studies on rare forms of
mouse strains that show enormous variation in their sus-
*e-mail: p-pandolfi@
familial inherited cancer syndromes have led to success-
ceptibility to different types of tumors provide a good
ski.mskcc.org
ful identification of many tumor-suppressor genes that
resource for various tumor models. Most importantly, the
http://tcb.trends.com 0962-8924/01/$-seefrontmatter©2001ElsevierScienceLtd.AII rights reserved. PII:S0962-8924(01)02127-4
eviev
Epidermal
I
L
cells
DMBA
TRENDS in Cell Biology Vo1.11 No.ll November 2001
T PA
Initiated cells
~Initiation H-ras mutation
Benign papilloma
J"
Squamous carcinoma
~"
Promotion
Progression
Progression
Cyclin D1 overexpression
Loss of p53
E-cadherin TGF-13
Spindle carcinoma
TRENDS in Ceil Biology
similarity between the mouse and human genomes, and
the regulation of cell growth and differentiation 3. This
particularly between the histological stages and genetic
promotes the selective clonal expansion of initiated epi-
pathways underlying tumor development in h u m a n and
dermal cells and leads to the formation of multiple squa-
mouse, make the mouse an ideal model system for the
mous papillomas. The progression stage is generally a
study of human cancer pathogenesis. Furthermore, it is
spontaneous process. It is characterized by a high level of
now possible to manipulate the mouse genome either by
genetic instability, particularly chromosomal alterations
overexpressing a dominantly acting oncogene in trans-
resulting in elevated expression of genes encoding Ha-Ras
genic mice or by deleting a tumor-suppressor gene from
and cyclin D 1, as well as loss of expression of the tumor-
the germline of knockout mutants in a tissue- and cell-
suppressor p53 (Ref. 7). These changes confer to papilloma
type-specific manner. Many of these transgenic and knock-
cells a further growth advantage, leading to the conversion
out mutants now provide faithful model systems for most
of the papillomatous lesion into malignant squamous car-
human cancers and will also permit analysis of the roles
cinoma. A further advanced stage in mouse skin carcino-
of strong and weak determinants and establish a link
genesis is the progression of squamous carcinoma to
between individual gene mutations and specific cellular
spindle carcinoma. This stage is associated with the changes
changes that lead to tumor development.
$3
Figure 1. Chemicallyinduced multistep skin carcinogenesis in the mouse Epidermal cells are initiated by 7,12-dimethyl-benzanthracene (DMBA) by causing a Ha-rasactivating mutation. Treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) results in upregulationof oyclin D1 gene expressionand promotes the formation of papilloma, Loss of functional p53 gene acceleratesthe progression of benign papillomato malignant carcinoma. Finally,transforming growth factor beta (TGF-~}) enhances the conversion of squamous carcinomato metastatic spindle cell carcinoma, accompaniedby downregulation and delocalizationof E-cadherin.
of epithelial differentiation markers, such as decreased expression of E cadherin, keratins K1 and K 10, and increased
Molecular carcinogenesis in the mouse:
expression of 0~6[~4 integrin 8.
the skin as a paradigmatic model system for the study of multistep tumorigenesis
lishes a l i n k between genetic pathways and histological
One of the best-established multistage tumorigenesis mod-
stages of tumor development but also serves as a model
The mouse skin carcinogenesis model not only estab-
els is mouse skin carcinogenesis. The sequential application
system to study tile functions of many other genes in the
of a carcinogen, followed by treatment with a non-carcino-
modulation of the tumorigenic process. For instance,
genic promoter can effectively induce skin tumors. Studies
DMBA-TPA treatment of cyclin D1-deficient mice re-
of chemically induced mouse skin tumors established the
suited in a decrease in skin tumor development, indicating
three stages of tumor development: initiation, promotion
that cyclin D1 is an important target of the Ha-Ras path-
and progression 3,4 (Fig. 1). Initiation is generally accom-
way in skin tumorigenesis 9. By contrast, pS3-deficient
plished by topical application of a single subcarcinogenic
mice displayed an accelerated progression of papilloma to
dose of skin carcinogen, such as 7,12-dimethyl-benzan-
carcinoma upon treatment, suggesting that p53 plays an
thracene (DMBA). The treatment causes irreversible DNA
important role in the tumor-progression phase 10. The in-
damage, resulting in mutation of the Ha-ras oncogene in
volvement of the c-los gene in malignant conversion in the
epidermal cells. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the
skin is corroborated by studies on the c-f0s knockout mice 11.
type of mutation of Ha-ras was dependent on the chemical
The promyelocytic leukemia (PML) tumor-suppressor
initiator, suggesting that the initiator has a direct effect on
gene has also been found to antagonize the initiation
the Ha-r0s gene s,6. The promotion is achieved by repeated
phase of skin tumorigenesis, resulting in increased tumor
application of skin promoters, most commonly the phor-
development in PML-null mice lz. This model system was
bo] esters, such as 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol- 13-acetate
also used to elucidate the dual functions exerted by the
(TPA). Although most tumor promoters do not bind co-
gene encoding TGT-~ in skin tumorigenesis 13,14. TGF-~
valently to DNA and are not mutagenic per se, they cause a
transgenic mice were more resiitant to the induction of
range of cellular and biochemical changes, such as elevated
benign papilloma, but the malignant conversion rate was
activation of protein kinase C and increased expression
greatly increased, and most of the carcinomas progressed
of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-Ct), c-Jun and
further to invasive spindle carcinomas. More recently, the
c-Fos, which have an obvious and direct connection with
epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor has also been
http://tcb.trends.com
A TRENDSGuide to CancerBiology
$4
I~t~'ll~'A'
TRENDS in Cell Biology Vo1.11 No.ll
November 2001
shown to play an essential role in SOS-dependent skin
to induce leukemia and that additional genetic events are
tumor development. In fact, SOS transgenic mice bearing
probably required. Furthermore, transgenic mice express-
a disrupted gene for the EGF receptor do not develop skin
ing another APL-specific fusion gene, PLZF-RARO~, dis-
tumors ~s. Finally, the mouse skin carcinogenesis model
play a very different phenotype z2. Leukemia that develops
has been of great use in defining the concept of haplo-
in PLZF-RARO~ transgenic mice more closely resembles
insufficiency in tumor suppression. For instance, skin
h u m a n chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This leukemia
carcinogenesis studies show that p27 ~P~ exerts the tumor-
is characterized by an expansion of myeloid cells that can
suppression function in a dose-dependent manner. The
terminally differentiate, whereas classic APL is character-
nullizygous and p27 kiP1heterozygous mice are both pre-
ized by a distinctive block in myeloid differentiation at
disposed to tumorigenesis, and the heterozygous mutants
the promyelocytic stage. Once again, leukemia in PLZF-
do not lose the wild-type allele 16. Further studies in other
RARer transgenic mice develops after a long latency.Thus,
mutant mouse models suggest that the p27 ~PI gene is
like PML-RARO~, PLZF-RAROt does not seem to be sufficient
not an exception, and that many other tumor suppressors
for APL leukemogenesis, and additional genetic alterations
are haplo-insufficient in their function, such as PML
have to occur in order to cause full-blown leukemia. The
(see below) 17.
phenotypic difference displayed by the two transgenic models indicates that PML-RAR0~ and PLZF-RARCt differ
Interspecific crosses of knockout and transgenic mutants for the study of multistep tumorigenesis: the APL paradigm
in their oncogenic activities and represent distinct RAR~
One of the most effective approaches for the study of
genetic events are required to block the differentiation at
cooperative tumorigenesis in the mouse is to cross a spe-
the promyelocytic stage.
mutants in spite of their identity in the RAR0t portion, suggesting that, in APL harboring PLZF-RAR(I, other
cific tumor-prone transgenic or knockout line with other
As the APL-specific chromosomal translocations are
transgenic or knockout mutants, thus allowing the assess-
reciprocal, RARO~-PML and RARO~-PLZF transgenic mice
ment of whether these additional mutations can acceler-
have also been generated. Interestingly, although RAR(~-
ate tumor development. The selection of'additional' gene
PML transgenic mice do not develop leukemia, RAROt-PML
mutations can be divided into two categories: (i) genes
acts as a tumor modifier, whose presence significantly
that are involved in the molecular biochemical pathway
increases the penetrance of PML-RARO~ and accelerates
that is thought to control the development of a tumor of
leukemia development (Fig. 2). Double transgenic mice
a specific histological origin; and (ii) genes that maintain
coexpressing PML-RARO~ and RAROt-PML reciprocal fusion
genome integrity. The first category includes genes that
genes develop early onset APL-like leukemia z3. The PML
regulate cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis.
gene also behaves like a tumor-suppressive modifier of
Genes that fall into the second category are those involved
PML-RARO~-induced leukemogenesis. Inactivation of both,
in DNA repair and the control of genome stability.
or even one, PML allele dramatically increases the inci-
A compelling example of the power of transgenic and
dence of APL-like leukemia in PML-/-/PML-RARot or
knockout methodology in the study of muhistep carcino-
PML+/-/PML-RARo~ double mutants 17.The data also dem-
genesis is provided by the attempt to dissect acute pro-
onstrate that PML is haplo-insufficient in antagonizing the
myelocytic leukemia (APL) pathogenesis in the mouse. APL
function of PML-RAR0~, In this respect, it must be em-
is associated with reciprocal chromosomal translocations,
phasized that, in the APL blast, the dose of the two genes
which always involve the retinoic acid receptor (RAR)O~
involved in the translocation is, in fact, reduced to hetero-
gene variably translocated and fused to five distinct genes:
zygosity, because one allele is involved in the translocation.
PML, promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF), nuclear
However, coexpression of PLZF-RARO~and RAR0t-PLZF
mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA), nuclear phosmin (NPM)
in double transgenic mice resulted in a completely different
and STAT5b (Re£ 18). As a consequence of these translo-
outcome. Rather than accelerating leukemia develop-
cations and in view of their reciprocity, two fusion genes
ment, the presence of RARO~-PLZF transformed the bio-
are generated, encoding two distinct fusion proteins, that
logical features of the disease from a CML-like leukemia in
coexist in the APL blast.
single TM to an APL-like leukemia in double TM (Fig. 2).
Transgenic mice expressing PML-RAR~ under the con-
In contrast, leukemia onset was unaffected. Thus, RAR~-
trol of a promyelocytic-specific promoter develop a form
PLZF did not function as a classic minor modifier, but rather
of leukemia that closely resembles h u m a n APL19 ~1. How-
as a tumor 'metamorphoser '2~. Similarly, loss of PLZF func-
ever, the incidence of leukemia development in these mice
tion also metamorphoses, once again in a dose-dependent
is low and the latency is long. These results suggest that
manner, the CML-like leukemia in PLZF-RAROt mice into
PML-RAROt translocation is necessary but not sufficient
APL-like leukemia in PLZF-/-/PLZF-RAROt mice 24,
http://tcb.trends.com
A TRENDSGuide to CancerBiology
]i~'J[~,,,
TRENDS in Cell B i o l o g y
Vo1.11No.ll November2001
S~,
The leukemia incidence and phenotype in PML-RARo~ or PLZF-RARo~ transgenic mice in an RARe-null back-
,a,
Ear,yonse:
ground has not yet been reported. It will be interesting to see whether partial or complete loss of RAR(~ function
APL
also plays a role in leukemogenesis.
X
Taken together, these studies in transgenic and knock-
APL
out models demonstrate that the two translocation prod-
~
Earlyonset > ~
ucts, as well as the inactivation of the genes involved in
APL
these translocations, are essential for the development of a leukemia with APL features. However, given the fact that the reciprocal translocation product is not expressed in 100% of
~
human APL patients, and that the earliest leukemia onset observed in double transgenic mutants is still approxi-
Phenotypicchange (
(b)
mately six months, it is possible that further genetic events are required. Several approaches could be applied to such APL mouse models in the search for these additional
~
~
>
APL x ~
Phenotypicchange ~, ( ~ ~ ~
genetic events, as we will discuss below. These additional hits could participate in the pathogenesis of h u m a n APL
APL
and also in the pathogenesis of other human cancers.
TRENDS in Cell Biology
I d e n t i f i c a t i o n of t u m o r - m o d i f i e r
g e n e s in t h e
mouse
F i g u r e 2. E f f e c t o f a d d i t i o n a l g e n e t i c hits in m o u s e m o d e l s o f A P L
Mouse models of cancer not only enable the determi-
(a) Crossesbetweenpremyelocyticleukemia (PML)-retinoic acid receptor c~(RARe)transgenic mice andRARc(-PML transgenic mice or PML-deficient mice result in acceleration of leukemia onset and alsoa higher incidence of leukemia.Thus,RAR~-PMLandPMLappear to function as tumordevelopmentmodifiers.(b) Bycontrast, crosses between promyelocyticleukemiazincfinger (PLZF)-RAR~transgenic mice and RARcc-Pt.ZFtransgenicmice or PLZF-defieient mice metamorphose the chronic myeloid leukemia(CML)-Iikephenotypeobservedin PLZF-RAR(x transgenicmiceintoacute promyelocyticleukemia(APL)-Iikeleukemia.Thus,RAR~-PI7F andpITF functionin APLastumor phenotypemodifiers or tumormetamorphosers,
nation of the role of specific genetic events in multistep tumorigenesis, as discussed above, but also help in identifying novel genes involved in this process, particularly tumor modifiers, which are notoriously difficult to discover by performing population-based genetic studies. A successful example of the potential of this approach is represented by the identification of Mom- 1. This tumor modifier was identified in an attempt to characterize
The molecular identification of Mom-1 represents a
genetic factors that influence tumor incidence in the Min
paradigm and exemplifies the power of mouse genetics
mouse, a strain that harbours a point mutation in the APe
for the analysis and identification of tumor modifiers.
gene and that is prone to develop multiple adenomatous
So far, the loci of many more tumor modifiers have been
polyposis in the small intestine zs. The incidence of poly-
identified, and their influences on tumor development
posis in the Min mouse varies considerably depending on
extend from affecting the size and number of the
the strain background. In a C57BL/6 background, Min
tumors to the latency and even the morphology of the
mice develop a large n u m b e r of tumors, whereas an AKR
tumors 17,24,28. Moreover, strong genetic interactions
background is resistant to the effects of the APC mutation.
between tumor modifiers have also been implicated in
Senetic mapping linked a locus on chromosome 4 to the
several linkage studies in various mouse models of h u m a n cancers z9,3°.
resistance. As this locus could change tumor susceptibility Lriggered by the Mill allele, it was named 'modifier of Min', )r Morn 1. Subsequent studies led to the identification of
N e w a p p r o a c h e s to i d e n t i f y a n d v a l i d a t e t h e
he gene encoding secreted phospholipase 2a (Pla2g2a)
role o f a d d i t i o n a l g e n e t i c e v e n t s in m o u s e
ts the gene encoding Morn-1 z6. Pla2g2a is highly ex-
models of human cancer
)ressed in the resistant strains, but weakly expressed in
SKY and CGH microarray in the mouse
he sensitive strains. Furthermore, mutation analysis in
Novel methodologies are allowing for more comprehen-
he sensitive and resistant strains identified a thymidine
sive study of the multistep process towards full-blown
nsertion that results in aberrant Pla2g2a splicing in the
transformation and metastasis in animal model systems.
~nsitive strain. Reintroduction of a functional Pla2g2
Additional genetic events occurring throughout cancer
ene into a sensitive strain renders the mice resistant to
evolution can now be studied in mouse models at various
amor development 27.
different levels with greater sensitivity.
http://tcb.trends.com
A TRENDS Guide to Cancer Biology
$6
[leview evlew I
TRENDS in Cell Biology
Vo1.11 No.ll November 2001
• At the chromosomal level by spectral karyotypmg (SKY). SKY has been developed to detect particular
Retroviral insertional mutagenesis has been successfully
chromosome translocations, regional chromosomal
used to identify various cancer-associated genes in the
amplifications and deletions 3~'32. SKY is based on
mouse. Random insertion of proviral sequence into the
hybridization of metaphase chromosomes with chro-
mouse genome can in fact alter gene expression. Some of
mosome-specific probes differentially labeled with a
these insertions can result in overexpression of proto-
combination of fluorophores. Utilizing a combination
oncogenes or silencing of tumor-suppressor genes, thus
of conventional fluorescent light microscopy, Fourier-
leading to acceleration in tumor development. As an
transform spectroscopy and CCD-camera, fluorescence-
example, the proviral insertion resulting in elevated
emission spectrum of each metaphase chromosome is
expression of a truncated N0tcM gene led to accelerated
measured simultaneously and their spectral images are
development of%cell tumors in c-rage transgenic mice *s.
visualized.
More recently, a newly improved method has been devel-
• At the gene locus level. Many methods have been
oped that uses inverse polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
applied, such as standard fluorescent in situ hybridiz
to allow quick identification of the tag sequences of
ation (FISH), comparative genornic hybridization
affected genes .6. The availability of the mouse genome
(CGH) 3a, genetic linkage and loss of heterozygosity
sequence and expressed sequence-tagged databases will
(LOH) analysis, whereas the development of oligo-
further facilitate the detection of cax~cer-associated genes.
nucleotide and eDNA microarrays allow the detection of changes in gene expression throughout tumor progression34 a6.
t h e s t u d y o f c o o p e r a t b J e o n c o g e n e s i s in th~
The combination of all of these approaches makes them extremely powerful for the precise location of
A novel retroviral gene delivery system has been proven
genetic changes during muhistep tumorigenesis. For
to be extremely useful for the study of cooperative on-
example, CGH and FISH can refine the region of trans-
cogenesis in the mouse 47. This system is based on the
location breakpoint after SKY narrows the search to a
utilization of the receptor of subgroup A avian leucosis
particular chromosomal region. Such combination has
virus, TVA. Mice do not harbour a TVA gene homolog and
allowed the identification of a recurrent translocation
are therefore resistant to avian virus infection. However,
on chromosome 14 in lymphomas in the ataxia-telangi-
in transgenic mice the expression of TVA receptor gene
ectasia mutated
under the control of tissue- or cell-specific promoter ren-
(ATM)-deficient m o u s e 37. Similar
analysis in PML-RAR~ and RARot-PML transgenic mice
der them susceptible to avian retroviral infection, allow-
revealed that deletion of chromosome 2 is a frequent
ing genes of interest to be introduced somatically in a
event in leukemia development 38. Furthermore, the
tissue- and cell type-specific manner 48. In practice, the
combination of CGH and microarray technology (CGH
gene of interest is cloned into an avian Rous sarcoma
microarray) makes it possible to analyse the whole
virus-derived replication-competent cloning vector
genome for DNA copy-number variation at higher
(RCAS). The proviral vector is transfected into chicken
resolution 39,*°. Conventional CGH, which was devel-
fibroblast cells to produce a high titer of infectious viral
oped to compare the changes of DNA copy n u m b e r
stock. The virus can then be delivered to TVA-expressing
across the genome, is based on hybridization of tumor
transgenic mice by injecting the virus-producing cells or
genomic DNA to the normal metaphase chromosomes.
by injecting the virus itself (Fig. 3). The TVA-based retro-
Therefore, the resolution is low and the technique can
viral gene delivery system offers several advantages over
only been used to determine regions of chromosomal
current transgenic and knockout mouse models. First, the
amplification and deletion. By contrast, DNA micro-
virus is replication competent and can be consistently
array-based CGH increases the resolution of CGH to
propagated in avian cells to produce a higher titer of viral
such an extent that, not only can it detect changes
stock. Second, infected murine cells do not produce
in known genomic regions, but it can also directly
infectious virus. The viral receptor in infected transgenic
identify candidate genes that are important to tumor
mouse cells remains available for multiple rounds of
development *',*z. Moreover, the combination of array
infection. Therefore, several genes of interest can be intro-
technology and genomic mapping makes it possible to
duced into the same cells simultaneously or sequentially,
study single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in a high-
allowing analysis of the phenotypic consequence of
throughput manner, thus speeding-up enormously the
genetic mutations, both individually and in combination.
mutational analysis and the linkage mapping of cancerassociated genes 43,44.
Furthermore, TVA transgenic mice can be crossbred with
http://tcb.trends.com
other transgenic or knockout mice to study the role of A TRENDS Guide to Cancer Biology
eviev
TRENDS in Cell B i o l o g y Vo1.11 No,ll
November 2001
cooperative genetic mutations in accelerating tumor development and metastasis. A recent study on the mecha-
TVA-transgenic mouse
RCAS-gene X
I Transfection
nisms of gliomagenesis demonstrates the power of the TVA-based approach for dissecting cooperative oncogen-
Tissue-specific promoter (t)
,
DF-1 cell
esis in the mouse 49. To investigate the role of epidermal
$7
TVA
I
growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in glioma pathogenesis, transgenic mice were generated that expressed the TVA receptor under the control of the astrocytespecific glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter.
I
X
Propagation
Infection of GFAP-TVA transgenic mice with the virus
t-TVA
encoding a constitutively active mutant EGFR did not result in glioma development. However, coinfection of
Infection >
GFAP-TVA transgenic mice with viruses carrying CDK4 and mutant t~GFR or infection of GFAP-TVA transgenic mice deficient in INK4a-ARF with the mutant EGFR virus triggered gliomagenesis, suggesting that genetic alterations of EGFR and INK4a-ARF are two crucial genetic events in gliomagenesis 49. h~cibie
transgene
and coaditiona~
knockout;
Recent advances in tissue-specific manipulation of tar-
TRENDS in Cell Biology
geted genes achieve a tighter spatial and temporal control of gene expression. These overcome the limitations encountered by generating conventional mouse mutants, such as embryonic lethality in the knockout approach or constitutively high levels of gene expression in transgenic mice. Inducible systems, originally developed for in vitro cellbiology studies, have been applied more recently in vivo in transgenic approaches to regulate gene expression in a controlled manner. One of the most widely used systems is the tetracycline system, which uses a tetracycline-responsive
Figure
3. T V A - b a s e d
gene
delivery
approach
Chicken DF-1 cells are transfected with a plasmid encoding the replication-competent subgroup A avian viral vector, Rous sarcoma virus-derived replication-competent cloning vector (RCAS), and a gene of interest (gene X). The retrovirus is produced and propagated in DF-1 cells to obtain high-titer virus particles. Next, the virus is used to infect transgenic mice expressing the TVA receptor under the control of a tissue- or cell-type-specific promoter (t). Mice do not harbour a TVA gene homolog and thus are resistant to avian viral infection. Only cells engineered to express TVA receptor can be infected. As a result, the retroviral infection enables the introduction of gene X into a specific cell-type or tissue (t-X). Mice carrying multiple genetic alterations can be obtained by crossing t-TVA transgenic mice with knockout or transgenic mutants (Y). The Y mutant harbors one mutation and additional mutations can be delivered by retroviral infection. The cooperative interaction between gene X and Y mutations can result in the development of tumors in the mouse.
promoter to drive the expression of the gene of interest s°. Another widely utilized method takes advantage of the
excision of the region located between loxP sites. Crosses
ability of the estrogen receptor (ER) to shuttle from the
of these two murine lines create a double mutant where
cytosol to the nucleus, upon binding to the ligand or ana-
the gene of interest is now disrupted in a tissue-specific
logues such as tamoxifen. The generation of an in-frame
manner. Several tumor-suppressor gene mutants have been
fusion between the protein of interest (e.g. a transcription
generated using the Cre-lox system in order to study the
factor) and the ER renders the activity of the fusion pro-
consequences of their inactivation in a given tissue (e.g. the
tein tamoxifen dependent sl.
intestinal-specific inactivation of APC or the mammary-
As far as gene knockout is concerned, the Cre-loxP sys-
specific inactivation of BRCAis3's4.
tem has been widely applied to create a conditional disruption of gene expression in a specific tissue sz. In essence, a first mutant mouse is generated where loxP sites flank
of cance~
the target gene, or part of it. These are short sequences
Recombinant congenic (RC) strains provide an additional
that are recognized only by the Cre (cyclization recombi-
useful tool for cancer study ss. RC strains are produced
nation) bacteriophage recombinase. LoxP sites are usually
by limited backcrossing between a common 'donor'
introduced by homologous recombination within introns
inbred strain and a common 'background' inbred strain,
9enes
of the target gene, so that they do not interfere with its
before proceeding with inbreeding of the progeny de-
proper translation. Next, a transgenic line is generated
rived from the initial backcross. In this way, a series of
where the Cre gene is under the control of a tissue-specific
strains is generated, each of which contains a random
promoter. Cre recognizes and catalyzes recombination and
small subset of genes from the donor strain and the
http://tcb.trends.com
A TRENDS Guide to Cancer Biology
S8
[[evie~ evle~ |
TRENDS in Cell Biology Vol.11 No.11 November 2001
m a j o r i t y o f g e n e s f r o m the b a c k g r o u n d strain. Typically, t h e RC strains carry a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 2 . 5 % o f t h e d o n o r genome
a n d 8 7 . 5 % o f the b a c k g r o u n d g e n o m e . As a
result, t h e i n d i v i d u a l g e n e o f the d o n o r s t r a i n t h a t m i g h t
References 1 Kinzler, K.W and Vogelstein, B. (I 996) Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell87, 159 170 2 Knudson, A.G., Jr et al. (1975) Mutation and childhood cancer: a
play a r o l e i n t u m o r i g e n e s i s can b e s e g r e g a t e d a n d its
probabilistic model for the incidence of retinoblastoma. Proc.Natl.
contribution
AcM. Sci. U.S.A. 72,
to t h e
multiple
complex
traits can b e
m a p p e d a n d s t u d i e d separately. This a p p r o a c h has p r o v e d effective i n i d e n t i f y i n g n e w c a n c e r - s u s c e p t i b i l i t y loci, p a r t i c u l a r l y for l u n g a n d c o l o n cancers i n the m o u s e . So far, n i n e n e w loci, S c c l - S c c 9 , have b e e n i d e n t i f i e d t h a t
5116 5120
3 Yuspa, S.H. (1998) The pathogenesis of squamous cell cancer: lessons learned from studies of skin carcinogenesis. J. Dermatoi. Sci. 17, 1-7 4 Akhurst, R.J. and Balmain, A. (1999) Genetic events and the role of
are i n v o l v e d i n t u m o r i g e n e s i s i n the c o l o n s6,sT, w h e r e a s
TGF beta in epithelial turnout progression. J. Path01. 187, 82-90
f o u r n e w loci, Sluc 1 - S l u c 4 , i n f l u e n c e the s u s c e p t i b i l i t y to
Quintanilla, M. et al. (1986) Carcinogen-specific mutation and
l u n g c a n c e r i n the m o u s e zg. This s y s t e m d o e s have a f e w
amplification of Ha-ras during mouse skin carcinogenesis. Nature
d i s a d v a n t a g e s , however. T h e s e i n c l u d e the l e n g t h o f t i m e
322, 78-80
r e q u i r e d to g e n e r a t e e a c h series o f RC strains, a n d l i m i
6 Bizub, D. et al. (t986) Mutagenesis of the Ha-ras oncogene in mouse
ted f a m i l y m e m b e r s available for e a c h RC series. I n a d d i
skin tumors induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Proc.Natl.
t i o u , the g e n e t i c m a p p i n g r e s o l u t i o n c a n b e p o o r i n RC
Acad. Sd. U.S.A.
strains i n l i m i t e d cases i n w h i c h t h e r e are a l a r g e n u m b e r o f s e g r e g a t e d loci. D e s p i t e these l i m i t a t i o n s , i n the f u t u r e this a p p r o a c h m i g h t p r o v i d e a s u b s t a n t i a l c o n t r i b u t i o n to the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f c a n c e r - s u s c e p t i b i l i t y g e n e s , t u m o r modifiers and metamorphosers.
83, 6048-6052
7 Kemp, CJ. et al. (1993) A/lelotype analysis of mouse skin tumors using polymorphic microsatellites: sequential gertetic alterations on chromosomes 6, 7, and 11. CancerRes. 53, 6022-6027 8 Cano, A. et al. (1996) Expression pattern of the cell adhesion molecules. E-cadherin, P-cadherin arid {z6~4 integrin is altered in pre-malignant skin rumors of p53 deficient mice. Iat.J. Cancer 68,
Concluding remarks In t h e p a s t f e w years, m o d e l i n g h u m a n
254-262 c a n c e r i n the
m o u s e h a s already p r o v e n i n c r e d i b l y i n s t r u c t i v e for s t u d y ing the mechanisms underlying cancer pathogenesis, the function of cancer genes and their intricate interactions
9 Robles, A.I. et al. (! 998) Rednced skin tumor development in cydin D1 deficient mice highlights the oncogenic ras pathway in viva.Genes Dev.
12, 2469-2474
10 Kemp, C.J. et al. (1993) Reduction of p53 gene dosage does not
i n m u h i s t e p t u m o r i g e n e s i s . The f u t u r e c o m p l e t i o n o f a
increase initiation or promotion but enhances malignax,t progression
p r o p e r a n n o t a t i o n o f the h u m a n a n d m o u s e g e n o m e , as
of chemically induced skin tumors. Cell 74, 813-822
w e l l as t h e a d v e n t o f n o v e l t e c h n o l o g i e s for the s t u d y o f c o o p e r a t i v e o n c o g e n e s i s i n the m o u s e a n d for the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f g e n e t i c events t h r o u g h o u t t u m o r p r o g r e s s i o n , w i l l c e r t a i n l y m a r k e d l y s p e e d u p this l e a r n i n g process. This a c c e l e r a t i o n is v e r y m u c h n e e d e d i n o r d e r to dise n t a n g l e t h e o v e r w h e l m i n g c o m p l e x i t y that s u c h a f l u r r y of genetic information will impose on our analytical capacity.
11 Saez, E. et a]. (1995) c-los is reqnired for malignant progression of skin tumors. Cell82,721 732 1Z Wang, Z.G. et a]. (1998) PML is essential for multiple apoptotic pathways. Nat Genet. 20,266 272 13 Cui, W et al. (1996) TGF~1 inhibits the formation of benign skin tumors, but enhances progression to invasive spindle carcinomas in transgenic mice. Cdl 86, 531 542 14 Glick, A.B. et aL (1994)Targeted deletion of the TGE-~l geue causes rapid progression to squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Dev.8,
Acknowledgements T h i s w o r k is s u p p o r t e d b y the NCI, the De W i t t W a l l a c e F u n d for M e m o r i a l S l o a n - K e t t e r i n g C a n c e r Center, the Mouse Model of Human Cancer Consortium (MMHCC), a n d N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e s o f H e a l t h G r a n t s to Pier Paolo Pandolfl a n d the L y m p h o m a & L e u k e m i a Society, o f w h i c h Pier Paolo Pandolfi is a Scholar. W e t h a n k A l a n B a l m a i n a n d M i n g H u for t h e i r s u g g e s t i o n s a n d critical r e a d i n g o f the m a n u s c r i p t . Finally, w e are i n d e b t e d to all the past a n d p r e s e n t m e m b e r s o f the l a b o r a t o r y o f M o l e c u l a r a n d D e v e l o p m e n t a l B i o l o g y (MADB) at M e m o r i a l Sloan-
2429-2440 15 Sibilia, M. et al. (2000) The EGF receptor provides an essential survival signal for SOS deper~dent skin tumor development. Cell 102, 211-220 16 Fero, M.L. et al. (I998) The murine gene p27Kipl is haploinsufficient for tumom suppression. Nature 396, 177-180 17 Rego, E.M. et al. (2001) Role of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein in tumor suppression. J. Exp.Med. 193, 521--529 18 Pandolfi, RR In viv0analysis of the molecular genetics of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncottene (in press) 19 He, L.Z. et a]. (1997) Acute leukemia with promyelocytic features in
K e t t e r i n g C a n c e r Center, w o r k i n g o n m o u s e m o d e l s o f
PML RARottransgenic mice. Proe. Natl.Acad. Sci. U. S.A. 94,
c a n c e r a n d r e l a t e d subjects.
5302-5307
http://tcb,trends.com
A TRENDS Guide to CancerBiology
:evie~
TRENDS in Cell Biology Vo1,11 No,ll
20 Brown, D. et al. (1997) A PML~RAR0t transgene initiates mnrine acute promyelocytic leukemia, Proc. Natl.Aend. Sci. U. S.A. 94,
S9
39 Pollack, J.R. et a]. (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number changes using cDNA microarrays. Not. Genet. 23, 41 46 40 Pinkel, D. et a]. (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy
2551-2856 Zl Grisolano, J.L. et al. (1997) Altered myeloid development and acute leukemia in transgenic mice expressing PML-RAR(z under control of cathepsin G regulatory sequences. Blood 89,376 387 22 He, L.Z. et al. (1998) Distinct interactions of PML-RAR{Z and PLZF-RAR0t with co repressors determine differential responses to
23 Pollock, J.L. et al. (1999) A bcr-3 isoform of R A R O ; - P M L potentiates the development of PML RARc~-driven acute promyekicytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Aend. Sci. U. S.A. 96, 15103-1 S 108 24 He, L. et al. (2000) Two critical hits for promyelocytic leukemia. M0].
41 Albertson, D.G. et al. (2000) Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene. Nat. Genet. 25, 144-146
ovarian cancer. Nat. Getter. 21, 99-102 43 Hacia, J.G. et d. (1999) Determination of ancestral alleles for human single nucleotide polymorphisms using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Genet. 22, 164-167 44 Hacia, J.G. et al. (1998) Strategies for mutational analysis of the large
1141
25 Dietrich, "vVRet el. (1993) Genetic identification of Morn-l, a major modifier locus affecting Min-induced intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Cell 75,631
number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet. 20,207-211
42 Shayesteh, L. et a]. (1999) PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in
RA inAPL. Nat. Genet. 18, t26-135
Cell6, 1131
November 2001
muhiexon ATM gene using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Genome Res. 8, 1245-1258
45 Girard, L. et a]. (1996) Frequent provirus insertional mntagenesis of
639
26 MacPhee, M. et al. (1995) The secretory phospholipase A2 gene is a candidate for the Moml locus, a major modifier of ApcMin-induced intestinal neoplasia. Ceil 81, 9 S 7-966 27 Cormier, R.T. et al. (1997) Secretory phospholipase Pla2g2a confers resistance to intestinal tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 17, 88-91
Notch1 in thymomas of MMTVD/myc transgenic mice suggests a collaboration of c-myc and Notehl for oncogenesis, Genes Dev. 1 O, 1930 1944 46 Li, J. et al. (1999) Leukaemia disease genes: large-scale cloning and pathway predictions. Nat. Genet. 23, 348-353 47 Fisher, G.H. et al. (1999) Development of a flexible and specific gene
28 Tripodis, N. and Demant, R (2001) Genetic linkage of nuclear morphology of mouse lung tumors to the Kras- 2 locus. Exp. Lunfl Res.
delivery system for production of murine tumor models. Oncogene 18, 5253 5260 48 Eederspiel, M.J. et aI. (1996) Expression of transduced genes in mice
27, 185-196 29 Fijneman, R.J. et 4. (1996) Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Slucl, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 14,
generated by infecting blastocysts with avian leukosis virus-based retroviral vectors. Proc. Natl. Aend. Sci. U. S.A. 93, 4931-4936 4-9 Holland, E.C. et al. (1998) A constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest
465-467 30 Nagase, H. et al. (2001) Epistatic interactions between skin tumor modifier loci in interspecific (spretus/musculus) backcross mice. Cancer Res. 61, 1305-1308
pathways to induce glioma-like lesions in mice. Genes Dev. 12, 3675-3685 50 Gossen, M. et al. (199 S ) Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in
31 Schrock, E. et al. (1996) Muhicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 2 7 3 , 4 9 4 - 4 9 7 3"* Liyanage, M. et al. (1996) Muhicolour spectral karyotyping of mouse chromosomes. Nat. Genet. 14, 312-31 S 33 Lichter, R et al. (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization: uses and limitations. Semin.Hematok 37, 348-357 34 DeRisi, J. et al. (1996) Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 14, 457 460 35 Lipshutz, R.J. et al. (1999) High density synthetic oligonucleotide
mammalian cells. Science 268, 1766-1769 S 1 Pelengaris, S. et al. (1999) Reversible activation of c-Myc in skin: induction of a complex neoplastic phenotype by a single oncogenic lesion. M01.Cell 3,565 577 $Z Kuhn, R. et al. (1995) Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science 269, 1427-1429 53 Shibata, H. et al. (1997) Rapid colorectal adenoma formation initiated by conditional targeting of the Apc gene. Science 2 7 8 , 120-123 54 Xu, X. et al. (1999) Conditional mutation of Brcal in mammary
arrays. Nat. Genet. 2 I, 20-24 36 Duggan, D.J. et al. (1999) Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. 21, 10-14
epithelial cells results in blunted ductal morphogenesis and tumour formation. Nat. Genet. 22, 37-43
37 Liyanage, M. et al. (2000) Abnormal rearrangement within the alpha/delta Tcell receptor locus in lymphomas from Aim-deficient
55 Moen, C.J. et al. (1991) The recombinant congenic strains - a novel genetic tool applied to the study of colon tumor development in the mouse. Marnm. Genome 1, 217-227
mice. Blood 96, 1940-1946 38 Zimonjic, D.B. et al. (2000) Acquired, nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities assodated with the development of acute promyelocytic leukemia in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Aend. Sci. U. S,A. 97, 13306-13311
56 van Wezel, T. et a]. (1996) Gene interaction and single gene effects in colon m m o u r susceptibility in mice. Nat. Genet. 14, 468-470 57 van Wezel, T. et al. (1999) Four new colon cancer susceptibility loci, Scc6 to Scc9 in the mouse. Cancer Res. 59, 4216-4218
http://tcb.trends.com
A TRENDS Guide to Cancer Biology