Journal Pre-proof A Rapid UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantitation of Phytoestrogens and the Distribution of Enterolactone in an Alabama Estuary
Jingyi Qi, Vanisree Mulabagal, Lan Liu, Caleb Wilson, Joel S. Hayworth PII:
S0045-6535(19)31696-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124472
Article Number:
124472
Reference:
CHEM 124472
To appear in:
Chemosphere
Received Date:
19 April 2019
Accepted Date:
26 July 2019
Please cite this article as: Jingyi Qi, Vanisree Mulabagal, Lan Liu, Caleb Wilson, Joel S. Hayworth, A Rapid UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantitation of Phytoestrogens and the Distribution of Enterolactone in an Alabama Estuary, Chemosphere (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2019.124472
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier.
Journal Pre-proof
1
A Rapid UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantitation of Phytoestrogens and the Distribution of
2
Enterolactone in an Alabama Estuary
3
Jingyi Qi, Vanisree Mulabagal, Lan Liu, Caleb Wilson, Joel S. Hayworth*
4
Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
*Corresponding Author Contact Information
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Joel S. Hayworth, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor 238 Harbert Engineering Center Department of Civil Engineering Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849 Office: (334) 844-7374 E-mail:
[email protected]
1
Journal Pre-proof
27
Abstract
28
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are natural or synthetic compounds that can interfere
29
with the endocrine systems of humans and wildlife.
30
treatment systems, or run off from urban areas or agricultural operations, into natural water
31
bodies, exposing resident and migratory organisms to complex EDC mixtures.
32
phytoestrogenic polyphenolics (PEPP) are known or suspected EDCs; however, their
33
contribution to total EDC burden in natural surface water systems is largely unknown. We
34
describe a rapid, sensitive, and reproducible quantitative method for analysis of 15 PEPP in
35
estuarine sediment and water, using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-triple
36
quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS).
37
resolution, peak separation, and rapid run times (method separation/total run time: 8/12.5 min).
38
With two exceptions, spiking experiments demonstrated that the percent recoveries for target
39
PEPP in sediment and water samples were within acceptable analytical validation limits. LOD
40
and LOQ values ranged from 0.004 to 0.010 ng/injection and 0.013 to 0.032 ng/injection,
41
respectively. The validated method was used for PEPP analysis of sediment and water samples
42
collected from 11 locations within the Perdido Bay estuary in coastal Alabama. No PEPP above
43
the LOD were detected in sediment samples. The mammalian-derived lignin enterolactone was
44
observed at low concentrations in water throughout the estuary, and significantly, at elevated
45
concentrations at two locations associated with small-scale septic systems (3.66 ± 0.27 ng L-1
46
and 4.01 ± 0.33 ng L-1) and a large wastewater treatment system (4.56 ± 0.24 ng L-1 and 5.69 ±
47
0.43 ng L-1).
EDCs can pass through wastewater
The method provides excellent peak
48 49
Keywords: UHPLC-MS/MS, EDC, phytoestrogens, enterolactone, estuary
2
Some
Journal Pre-proof
50
1.0 Introduction
51
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are natural or synthetic compounds that can
52
interfere with the endocrine systems of humans and wildlife, potentially resulting in adverse
53
developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune effects (NIEHS, 2016).
54
EDCs, there may be no threshold value below which effects do not occur. Also, the effects of
55
mixtures of EDCs can be additive and synergistic, causing organism alterations where individual
56
EDCs may not (Colborn et al., 1996; Diamanti-Kandarakis et al., 2009; Bergman et al., 2013;
57
Gore et al., 2015). Modern human activities are the primary source of EDCs in the environment.
58
It is not uncommon for EDCs to pass through municipal or industrial wastewater treatment
59
systems, or run off from urban areas or agricultural operations, eventually reaching natural water
60
bodies like rivers, estuaries, and marine systems (Laganà et al., 2004; Stackelberg et al., 2004;
61
Bacaloni et al., 2005; Beck et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2010). Resident and migratory organisms
62
living in these natural systems are at risk of exposure to complex mixtures of EDCs.
For many
63
Some phytoestrogenic polyphenolics (PEPP) are known or suspected EDCs (Waring et
64
al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Chighizola and Meroni, 2012; Boberg et al., 2013; Ferreira-Dias et al.,
65
2013). PEPP are synthesized in many plants to protect them from predators and to attract
66
symbiotic soil bacteria and insects (Fox, 2004). The major synthesized PEPP are isoflavones and
67
lignans, which are found predominantly in the Leguminosae family (Dixon, 2004). The amount
68
and location of PEPP within individual plants vary; however, many of these compounds are
69
found in food products at high concentrations (Mazur et al., 1998; Kuhnle et al., 2009; Michel et
70
al., 2013).
71
There is evidence that some PEPP are structurally and/or functionally similar to ovarian
72
and placental estrogens and their active metabolites (Martin et al., 1978; Verdeal et al., 1980;
3
Journal Pre-proof
73
Setchell and Adlercreutz, 1988; Whitten and Patisaul, 2001). Phytoestrogenic PEPP are thought
74
to bind to estrogen receptors (ERs) and induce estrogenic or anti-estrogenic responses in target
75
tissues (Shutt and Cox, 1972; Wynne-Edwards, 2001; Bacciottini et al., 2007), or interfere with
76
estrogenic response or the amount of free estrogen in organisms through alternative mechanisms
77
(Michel et al., 2013). Although the estrogen-like hormonal activity of some PEPP is two to five
78
orders of magnitude below that of estradiol, their abundance in certain plants and slow metabolic
79
utilization can lead to tissue concentrations exceeding endogenous estrogen by several orders of
80
magnitude (Ward and Thompson, 2012).
81
Isoflavones with a 3 phenyl chromone ring structure represent the largest group of plant
82
phenolics exhibiting estrogenic activity. Isoflavones with significant estrogenic activity mainly
83
exist as glucosides (daizin, genistin, and glycitin) or methoxylated (formononetin and biochanin
84
A) in soy. Aglycone structures have demonstrated higher estrogenic potency compared to their
85
corresponding glycosides (Clarke et al., 2008).
86
shown ERα agonist activity 100 times more potent than genistein (Quifer-Rada et al., 2013).
87
Studies have demonstrated that flavonoids exhibit higher estrogenic activity when compared to
88
lignans (Whitten and Patisaul, 2001). The most common lignans, matairesinol and
89
secolariciresinol, are found predominantly in flaxseed.
90
mammalian gastrointestinal bacteria to yield enterolactone and enterodiol, respectively (Michel
91
et al., 2013).
8-prenylnaringenin, a prenylflavonoid, has
These lignans are metabolized by
92
Advancements in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) instrumentation
93
have led to methods for analyzing some PEPP at low concentrations in food, botanical
94
supplements, and in environmental samples. However, rapid quantitative analysis of multiple
95
PEPP in complex environmental samples at trace concentrations is a continuing need. The goal
4
Journal Pre-proof
96
of the work presented here was to develop and validate a rapid, sensitive and reproducible
97
analytical method for the detection and quantitation of 15 target PEPP in estuarine sediment and
98
water using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography, triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
99
(UHPLC-MS/MS). We describe an extraction method followed by dispersive solid phase
100
cleanup and UHPLC-MS/MS quantitation. The method presented here was used to investigate
101
the presence and distribution of target PEPP in sediment and water in the northern Gulf of
102
Mexico estuary of Perdido Bay.
103
2.0 Materials and methods
104
2.1 Chemicals, reagents and materials
105
A total of 15 PEPP and 1 internal standard were used in this study (Fig. 1). Analytical
106
phenolic standards having >98% purity (daidzein, genistein, biochanin A, formononetin,
107
coumestrol, glycitin, ononin, naringenin, apigenin, resveratrol, 8-pyenylnaringenin, 6-
108
pyenylnaringenin, xanthohumol, isoxanthohumol, enterodiol, enterolactone); chrysin (internal
109
standard), magnesium sulfate, and dimethyl sulfoxide were acquired from Sigma Aldrich (St.
110
Louis, MO), as were Whatman glass microfiber filters GF/C (47 mm). LC/MS grade solvents
111
(methanol, acetonitrile, and water), analytical grade formic acid, and ammonium acetate reagents
112
were acquired from VWR International (Suwanee, GA). Chem Tube-Hydromatrix, ammonium
113
formate, Captiva Nylon/PTFE syringe filters (0.2 µm), analytical columns (InfinityLab Poroshell
114
120 Bonus-RP, 2.1 x 100 mm, 2.7 µm, p/n 861768-901; InfinityLab Poroshell 120 Phenyl-
115
Hexyl, 2.1 x 100 mm, 2.7 µm, p/n 695775-912) and guard column (InfinityLab Poroshell 120
116
Phenyl-Hexyl guard column, 2.1x 5 mm, p/n 821725-914) were acquired from Agilent
117
Technologies (Wilmington, DE). Oasis PRiME HLB 6 cc extraction cartridge and 20-Position
118
vacuum manifold were acquired from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA).
5
Journal Pre-proof
Fig. 1. Chemical structure of 15 target PEPP and 1 internal standard used in this study. 119
2.2 Standard Solutions
120
Stock solutions of PEPP reference standards were prepared in a solvent mixture (80%
121
methanol/20% water, v/v) to obtain 1 mg/mL concentration. Working concentrations of
122
reference standards (0.1 µg mL-1 and 0.01 µg mL-1) for method development and for generating
123
calibration curves (concentrations range: 0.1 to 50 ng mL-1) were prepared by diluting stock
124
solutions with the same solvent mixture.
125
2.3 Sample collection and storage
126
Sediment and water sampling locations are shown in Fig. 2 and summarized in Table 1.
127
Sediment samples were obtained using a vibracore system designed for collecting relatively long
128
cores (10 cm in diameter and up to 2 m in length) in high energy shallow water coastal
129
environments (Mulabagal et al., 2017). Surface water samples were collected in duplicate into
130
high-density polyethylene (HDPE) containers (~4.1 L total volume per sample container, ~8.2 L 6
Journal Pre-proof
Fig. 2. Sediment and water sampling locations within Perdido Bay watershed. 131
total per sample location) using a 1L stainless steel Kemmerer Bottle water sampler. At each
132
location, water samples were collected at one-half of the total water depth. All sediment and
133
water samples were placed in coolers on ice (approximately 4 ºC) during transportation and
134
archived at -20 ºC until analyzed.
135
2.4 Sample preparation
136
Frozen archived sediment samples (10 cm in diameter and approximately 91 cm in
137
length) were thawed to room temperature and cut into two identical portions: 0-46 cm
138
approximate depth below sediment surface and 46-91 cm approximate depth below sediment
139
surface. Each portion was homogenized and a subsample (10 g ± 0.05 g) placed directly into a
140
Nalgene centrifuge tube. To this hydromatrix (0.5 g), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (0.5 g) were
141
added to enhance sediment homogenization and extraction efficiency. The resultant mixture was
7
Journal Pre-proof
Table 1 Sediment and water sampling locations within Perdido Bay watershed. Location
Description
Longitude
Latitude
1 2 3 4 5 6
Moccasin Bayou Middle Wolf Bay Lower Wolf Bay Intracoastal Waterway Perdido River Mouth of Elevenmile Creek
-87.60110 -87.58830 -87.61080 -87.58910 -87.39970 -87.37720
30.34883 30.32215 30.30161 30.30012 30.45064 30.45778
7 8 9 10 11
Mouth of Bayou Marcus Upper Perdido Bay Middle Perdido Bay Lower Perdido Bay Tarkiln Bayou
-87.34000 -87.37400 -87.41990 -87.45090 -87.42220
30.43054 30.43432 30.40769 30.36529 30.35155
142
extracted with 10 mL of solvent (70% methanol and 30% water). The combined sediment-
143
hydromatrix-anhydrous sulfate-extraction solvent samples were vortexed for 30 s, every 20 min
144
during equilibration to room temperature (2 h). Once equilibrated to room temperature, samples
145
were centrifuged at 4000 rpm (4 ºC) for 5 min. After centrifugation, supernatants (6 mL) were
146
transferred into clean centrifuge tubes containing Agilent Bond Elut QuEChERS dispersive-SPE
147
and vortexed for 30 s. Samples were then centrifuged at 13000 rpm (4º C) for 5 min. Extracts
148
were then filtered through Captiva PTFE membrane filters (0.2 µm) and spiked with chrysin
149
(internal standard, 5ng mL-1) prior to UHPLC/MS/MS analysis.
150
Water samples were equilibrated to room temperature prior to extraction. Each sample
151
(~4.1 L) was passed through GE Whatman glass microfiber 47 mm filters using a micro-
152
filtration assembly under vacuum to remove suspended particulate matter (SPM). Filtrates (4 L
153
measured) were processed using Waters Oasis PRiME HLB 6 cc solid phase extraction (SPE)
154
cartridges and a vacuum manifold system. Samples were loaded onto cartridges at a controlled 8
Journal Pre-proof
155
flow rate of 5 mL min-1, and then eluted with LC grade water (10 mL) to remove salt-based
156
matrices. Cartridges were then vacuum-dried and target analytes retained on the sorbent were
157
eluted with methanol (10 mL). Methanol extracts were filtered through 0.2 µm membrane
158
syringe filters and spiked with 5 ng mL-1 chrysin prior to UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
159
2.5 UHPLC-MS/MS conditions
160
Target PEPP were analyzed using an Agilent UHPLC-MS/MS system: Agilent 1290
161
Infinity II pump (model G7120A), degasser, autosampler, and temperature-controlled column
162
compartment coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (model G6460C) with a Jet-
163
Stream Electrospray Ionization source (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
164
Chromatographic separation was assessed using the two narrow bore UHPLC columns
165
previously noted. Different binary mobile phase compositions (methanol-water, acetonitrile-
166
water, mixture of methanol and acetonitrile-water), infused with modifiers (formic acid,
167
ammonium formate, ammonium acetate), as well as varied column temperatures (20 °C to 60 °C)
168
and flow rates (0.15 to 3.0 ml min-1) were tested during analytical runs.
169
2.6 Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) conditions
170
Full (MS2), single ion monitoring (SIM), and product ion (PI) scan experiments were
171
performed to optimize ion source conditions and MRM data acquisition parameters for detection
172
of target PEPP. MS and MS/MS experiments were performed in dual mode (both negative and
173
positive ionization mode), and source conditions (gas temperature and flow, sheath gas
174
temperature and flow, fragmentor voltage, collision cell energy, nebulizer pressure, nozzle
175
voltage and capillary voltage) were systematically optimized.
176
2.7 Method validation and data analysis
177
An internal standard quantitative method was used for PEPP analysis. Linear calibration
178
curves were constructed by using analyte/internal standard response ratios to quantify unknown 9
Journal Pre-proof
179
PEPP concentrations in experimental samples. Identification of target PEPP in environmental
180
samples was achieved by comparing chromatographic peak retention times and MRM
181
parameters (specific qualifier and quantifier ions) with those of reference standards.
182
Experimental samples (sediments, water samples) were prepared twice and each sample was
183
analyzed five times to obtain multiple data points.
184
Method specificity was assessed by analyzing solvent blanks between sample runs to test
185
for interference due to chromatography carryover. Method recovery and repeatability parameters
186
were evaluated by conducting a spiking study. Sediments used in the spiking experiments were
187
randomly selected subsets of top and bottom core sediment collected from each of the 11
188
sampling locations. Prior to conducting spiking experiment, PEPP analysis of the composite
189
sediment was performed, and no target PEPP were detected. Spiking concentrations of PEPP
190
used in sediment and water samples were 20 ng mL-1, and 50 ng mL-1, respectively. Percent
191
recoveries (%R) were calculated using: %R =
ARspiked sample ― ARunspiked sample 100 Spiked standard concentration
(1)
192
where %R = ((AR spiked sample−AR un-spiked sample)/spiked standard concentration)*100.
193
Linear calibration curves were used to compute LOD (3SD/b) and LOQs (10SD/b). SD is the
194
standard deviation of the response and b is the slope of the calibration curve. Internal standard
195
peak areas in samples were measured and compared with average areas measured during initial
196
calibration. The internal standard measured area calculated in samples ranged from 80 to 85%
197
compared to peak response observed in calibration samples. Quantitative and qualitative data
198
analysis was carried out using Agilent Mass Hunter software version B. 07.1.
199
3.0 Results and discussion
200
3.1 Optimization of sample preparation 10
Journal Pre-proof
201
PEPP in environmental samples are often at trace concentrations and accompanied by
202
complex biological matrices. To achieve reliable and reproducible quantitative results, sample
203
preparation involving extraction, purification, and pre-concentration is necessary. For sediment
204
samples, an efficient extraction and purification method based on a previously published
205
approach was used (Mulabagal et al., 2017). Initially, homogenized sediment samples (from 1 g
206
to 10 g) were extracted with various compositions of solvent mixtures (methanol/water;
207
acetonitrile/water: 90:10; 80:20; and 70:30 ratio) to achieve optimal PEPP extraction. This was
208
followed by SPE using Hydromatrix (HM), an inert sorbent with a porous structure which
209
enables solvents to penetrate the matrix and extract analytes while retaining biological matrices
210
(Blasco et al., 2007). HM quantities were optimized to improve target compound extraction
211
efficiency; optimal extraction for sediment samples was achieved with 70% methanol in water,
212
0.5 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 0.5 g of HM. Extracts were then purified using
213
QuEChERS dispersive-SPE to eliminate substances with potential to negatively influence target
214
PEPP ionization. After cleanup, samples were filtered through 0.2 µm captive premium PTFE
215
syringe filters prior to UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
216
Water samples were passed through glass fiber membrane filters to remove SPM and
217
then pre-concentrated using Oasis HLB cartridges. These cartridges require no preconditioning
218
and thus require less time for sample processing.
219
3.2 Optimization of chromatographic conditions
220
Details of optimized UHPLC conditions are presented in Table 2. An organic mobile
221
phase with methanol resulted in higher response for all target analytes compared to acetonitrile.
222
To achieve optimal response and peak shape, different concentrations of ammonium formate in
223
the mobile phase were tested. Overall, methanol infused with 1 mM ammonium formate resulted
11
Journal Pre-proof
Table 2 Optimized UHPLC-MS/MS conditions for PEPP quantitative method. Pump Analytical column Guard column Mobile phase Gradient method conditions
Flow rate Total run time analysis Column temperature Injection volume Injection wash solvent Gas temperature Gas flow Nebulizer Sheath gas temperature Sheath gas flow Capillary voltage Nozzle voltage Delta EMV Cell acceleration voltage MS1 and MS2 resolution
UHPLC Conditions Agilent Infinity 1290 II Agilent Poroshell 120 Phenyl-Hexyl (2.1×100 mm, 2.7 µm, p/n 695775-912) Agilent Poroshell 120 Phenyl-Hexyl (2.1×5 mm, 2.7 µm, p/n 821725-914) A. 1 mM ammonium formate in water; B. 1 mM ammonium formate in methanol Time (min) B% 0 30 1-4 50 4.5-6.2 55 7 68 13 85 13.2-13.9 99 14 30 Post run: 3 min 0.25 mL min-1 12.5 min 40 ºC 5 µL Methanol/acetonitrile/water (40/40/20, v/v) MS/MS Conditions 300 ºC 10 L min-1 40 Psi 350 ºC 10 L/min +3500 V / -4000 V +500 V / -1000 V +/- 400 V 4V Unit
224
in a more defined and intense chromatographic peak compared to that of formic acid and
225
ammonium acetate. Excellent peak separation for all 15 target analytes was achieved on an
226
Agilent Poroshell 120 Phenyl Hexyl column, with a column temperature of 40 °C, in a total run
227
time of 12.5 min. During analysis, a diverter valve on the UHPLC system was used to minimize
228
matrix interference, directing flow to waste from 0 to 2 min and from 10 to 12.5 min before and
12
Journal Pre-proof
229
after all PEPP were eluted. Sample flow was sent to the detector from 2 to 10 min resulting in an
230
8 minute data acquisition time. The MRM chromatogram was processed to ensure all analytes
231
were eluted within the 8 minute data acquisition time. Several sample injection volumes were
232
also considered (1, 2, 5, and 10 µL), with 5 µL providing an optimal peak shape.
233
3.3 Optimization of MRM conditions
234
Experiments were performed in MS2, SIM, PI scan modes using target PEPP standards.
235
Precursor ions were chosen as the most abundant signal in the MS2 scan spectra corresponding
236
to a particular molecular ion (Kuhnle et al., 2009). MS2 scan experiments were conducted in
237
dual (positive and negative) mode to identify the most intense molecular ion for each target
238
PEPP with suitable ionization conditions. SIM scans were performed at varied fragmentor
239
voltages (80 to 180 V), and conditions were optimized to achieve the most pronounced target
240
analyte peaks. PI scans were conducted at different collision cell energies (0-60 eV) to obtain
241
quantitative and qualitative mass transition ions required to perform MRM experiments. For each
242
target analyte, quantitative analysis used the most abundant product ion, confirmed by the next
243
abundant ion. Experiments were performed in MRM mode and method conditions were adjusted
244
further to produce an optimal response for each target analyte, resulting in excellent peak shape
245
and separation within a short run time (Fig. 3). MRM conditions and results are summarized
246
Tables 2 and 3.
247
3.4 Analytical method validation
248
Quantitative analysis was performed using an internal standard approach (7 point
249
calibration curves for each target analyte; concentration range 0.1 to 50 ng mL-1) to control
250
variation in mass detection during the ionization process and minimize matrix effects in actual
251
environmental samples. Chrysin was used as the internal standard because of its structural
252
similarity to the target analytes (Prasain et al., 2010; Magiera et al., 2012). Calibration curves 13
Journal Pre-proof
Fig. 3. Extracted MRM chromatograms for 15 PPEP and 1 internal standard in 10 ng mL-1 PEPP standard mixture (2 ng/mL internal standard). 253
for each target PEPP demonstrate method linearity (r2 >0.998) and accuracy.
254
reproducibility was acceptable based on multiple analysis of retention times (Fig. 3). Limits of
255
quantitation and detection (LOQ and LOD, respectively) further demonstrate method sensitivity
256
for quantitation of target PEPP in sediment and water (Table 3).
257
resveratrol and enterodiol in 6 sediment samples, percent recoveries of target PEPP obtained in
258
spiking experiments in sediment and water samples were within the acceptable recovery range of 14
Method
With the exception of
Journal Pre-proof
Precursor Ion
Product Ions
Fragmentor voltage (V)
Collision cell energy (eV)
Polarity
LOQ (ng/inj)
LOD (ng/inj)
1 Resveratrol 2 Daidzein 3 Formononetin 4 Apigenin 5 Genistein 6 Naringenin 7 Biochanin A 8 Enterolactone 9 Enterodiol 10 8-Prenylnaringenin 11 6-Prenylnaringenin 12 Xanthohumol 13 Isoxanthohumol 14 Ononin 15 Glycitin IS* Chrysin *IS: internal standard
Retention Time (min)
Target analyte
No.
Table 3 Optimized MRM data acquisition parameters, LOQ and LOD for target PEPP.
2.943 4.064 7.814 6.388 5.649 5.959 9.187 5.879 3.94 9.833 11.933 12.158 8.911 4.19 2.476 8.994
227 253 267 269 269 271 285.1 297 301.1 339.1 339.1 353.1 355.1 431.1 447.1 253
143, 185 132, 208 252, 222.9 116.9, 151 132.9, 63.1 151, 118.9 213.1, 152 253.1, 106.9 253, 106 218.9, 118.9 219.1, 118.9 118.9, 233 179, 299 269.1 285 143
130 160 130 150 150 120 150 140 140 140 150 150 130 100 80 150
25 40 20 30 30 10 40 15 20 15 15 20 25 10 5 30
N N N N N N P N N N N N P P P P
0.021 0.017 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.032 0.018 0.030 0.022 0.022 0.027 0.021 0.015 0.014 0.015
0.006 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.010 0.005 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.005
259 260
80-120% (Lin et al., 2016) (Table 4). Thus, the developed method is appropriate for quantitative
261
analysis of all target PEPP in estuarine water, but may not be appropriate for quantitative
262
analysis of resveratrol and enterodiol in estuarine sediment (although it is applicable to
263
qualitative analysis of these analytes in sediment).
264
3.5 Application to environmental samples
265
The validated UHPLC-MS/MS method was used to analyze target PEPP in estuarine
266
sediment and water samples collected from locations in Perdido Bay (Table 1 and Fig. 2) in early
267
March, 2017. Solvent blanks were used between field samples to minimize PEPP carryover
268
from sample to sample during analysis. No target PEPP were observed in sediment samples.
269
The only target PEPP observed in water samples was the lignin enterolactone, observed in nearly 15
Journal Pre-proof
Table 4 Results of PEPP method recovery experiments. Analyte
1T
1B
Sediment* 2B 3T
2T
3B
4T
4B
Resveratrol
79.7 ± 4.0
83.4 ± 5.2
83.0 ± 4.0
75.0 ± 4.0
64.2 ± 4.6
50.6 ± 4.0
53.2 ± 5.2
45.5 ± 2.2
Daidzein
110.5 ± 3.1
107.8 ± 5.3
102.7 ± 7.7
105.2 ± 3.5
105.4 ± 8.3
95.8 ± 3.7
97.4 ± 7.4
99.0 ± 6.0
Formononetin
111.4 ± 4.2
110.0 ± 5.4
109.0 ± 6.7
111.0 ± 4.9
106.2 ± 3.0
110.2 ± 4.4
106.6 ± 4.3
108.0 ± 3.5
Apigenin
108.3 ± 9.5
102.9 ± 6.4
102.4 ± 4.4
90.8 ± 5.9
107.0 ± 4.1
112.1 ± 3.6
103.1 ± 2.9
108.8 ± 6.3
Genistein
110.9 ± 3.2
111.5 ± 2.0
108.5 ± 6.7
103.1 ± 2.3
111.0 ± 2.1
103.4 ± 6.7
106.0 ± 3.8
103.4 ± 5.4
Naringenin
105.0 ± 6.5
103.7 ± 2.3
101.5 ± 2.4
101.6 ± 2.8
96.1 ± 4.8
88.7 ± 3.6
87.7 ± 6.8
85.1 ± 7.0
Biochanin A
109.2 ± 3.5
112.0± 5.1
110.1 ± 6.4
105.2 ± 1.7
115.0 ± 4.8
109.2 ± 3.3
110.4 ± 3.8
113.6 ± 7.1
Enterolactone
108.4 ± 7.0
112.9 ± 1.8
114.5± 3.5
114.4 ± 3.6
113.8 ± 5.3
113.6 ± 1.2
109.6 ± 5.1
112.2 ± 8.1
Enterodiol
86.0 ± 3.0
87.3 ± 6.0
79.6 ± 5.2
70.9 ± 4.5
77.2 ± 5.3
66.4 ± 3.1
73.2 ± 4.7
61.3 ± 4.4
8-Prenylnaringenin
115.3 ± 3.6
117.2 ± 3.0
112.1 ± 4.8
107.3 ± 6.9
115.2 ± 5.8
102.4 ± 5.2
106.1 ± 4.7
101.1 ± 6.6
6-Prenylnaringenin
114.1 ± 2.2
114.8 ± 2.8
110.4 ± 4.3
107.3 ± 6.6
120.5 ± 4.3
112.3 ± 2.0
110.9 ± 5.6
111.8 ± 7.7
Xanthohumol
108.0 ± 6.4
108.8 ± 6.5
113.7 ± 2.5
123.7 ± 8.2
111.7 ± 3.0
115.1 ± 2.4
108.7 ± 4.5
110.5 ± 7.1
Isoxanthohumol
114.0 ± 4.0
116.1 ± 1.8
114.3 ± 3.5
116.8 ± 4.9
106.2 ± 3.0
113.4 ± 1.4
112.0 ± 6.2
116.9 ± 6.2
Ononin
110.2 ± 6.0
108.5 ± 3.3
108.4 ± 4.2
110.2 ± 4.6
112.5 ± 3.6
115.6 ± 4.9
112.8 ± 2.8
120.5 ± 7.5
Glycitin
106.2 ± 3.0
103.1 ± 4.1
96.4 ± 3.7
103.0 ± 2.7
103.4 ± 3.3
102.5 ± 2.9
97.2 ± 2.4
108.1 ± 7.9
*T: top (0-46 cm) of sediment core; B: bottom (46-91 cm) of sediment core
Analyte
Water 1
2
3
4
Resveratrol
97.3 ± 3.5
101.4 ±1.3
93.1 ± 2.3
93.4 ± 1.5
Daidzein
103.6 ± 5.0
101.4 ± 2.5
99.9 ± 2.5
100.1 ± 1.9
Formononetin
105.8 ± 3.0
100.4 ± 1.4
90.7 ± 1.7
98.6 ± 2.2
Apigenin
95.8 ± 2.4
104.6 ± 1.6
100.9 ± 5.9
107.9 ± 2.3
Genistein
104.2 ± 7.6
101.0 ± 1.3
99.0 ± 2.5
102.3 ±1.3
Naringenin
116.8 ± 4.1
103.8 ± 1.6
97.3 ± 2.8
101.2 ± 1.4
Biochanin A
92.3± 2.2
99.7 ± 5.7
88.8 ± 1.5
89.7 ± 1.6
Enterolactone
107.4 ± 1.9
104.2 ± 2.9
101.1 ± 2.5
103.0 ± 2.5
Enterodiol
102.2 ± 1.1
106.6 ± 1.1
103.3 ± 2.4
106.9 ± 1.6
8-Prenylnaringenin
108.3 ± 1.4
105.5 ± 3.3
106.0 ± 1.4
113.0 ± 1.1
6-Prenylnaringenin
97.6 ± 1.3
101.1 ± 1.9
102.9 ± 2.1
107.7 ± 1.2
Xanthohumol
100.2 ± 1.5
99.2 ± 0.2
97.2 ± 1.1
99.7 ± 1.6
Isoxanthohumol
93.5 ± 1.9
97.5 ± 1.9
92.4 ± 2.3
92.1 ± 1.6
Ononin
79.3 ± 2.6
106.0 ± 1.8
101.4 ± 3.6
102.1 ± 2.4
Glycitin
108.1 ± 2.5
109.3 ± 3.6
108.2 ± 1.6
108.4 ± 2.8
270 271
all water samples (Table 5). Higher concentrations of enterolactone were observed in duplicate
272
water samples collected from two sampling locations: the mouth of Moccasin Bayou (location 1;
273
3.66 ± 0.27 ng L-1 and 4.01 ± 0.33 ng L-1) and the mouth of Bayou Marcus (location 7; 4.56 ± 16
Journal Pre-proof
Table 5 Observed enterolactone concentrations in surface water samples. Location
Enterolactone (ng L-1 ± SD )*
Description
Sample 1
Sample 2
1
Moccasin Bayou
3.66 ± 0.27
4.01 ± 0.33
2
Middle Wolf Bay
0.47 ± 0.02
0.48 ± 0.03
3
Lower Wolf Bay
0.08 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
4
Intracoastal Waterway
0.19 ± 0.03
0.14 ± 0.01
5
Perdido River
ND
ND
6
Mouth of Elevenmile Creek
0.61 ± 0.05
0.12 ± 0.06
7
Mouth of Bayou Marcus
4.56 ± 0.24
5.69 ± 0.43
8
Upper Perdido Bay
0.29 ± 0.04
0.07 ± 0.01
9
Middle Perdido Bay
0.11 ± 0.01
0.61 ± 0.05
10
Lower Perdido Bay
ND
ND
11
Tarkiln Bayou
ND
ND
*Results from duplicate collected samples; SD: standard deviation; ND: below LOD 274
0.24 ng L-1 and 5.69 ± 0.43 ng L-1).
275
Enterolactone and enterodiol are formed by bacteria in the intestinal tract of mammals
276
after consuming the plant lignans matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, which exist primarily in
277
whole-grains like flaxseed, lentils, barley, rye and wheat (Wang, 2002). Studies focusing on the
278
presence, distribution, behavior, and ecological implications of mammalian phytoestrogens are
279
limited. Based on a limited number of studies, a 2015 review of phytoestrogens in surface
280
waters world-wide estimated enterolactone concentrations ranging from 0.2-74 ng/ L-1 in
281
freshwater rivers. A one year seasonal sampling study in the Douro River estuary on the west
282
coast of Portugal in 2015 found an average summer enterolactone concentration of < 44 ng L-1;
283
enterolactone was not detected during other seasonal sampling events (Ribeiro et al., 2016). 17
Journal Pre-proof
284
Because enterolactone and enterodiol is produced in mammals as opposed to plants, their
285
presence in natural water bodies is due entirely to mammalian urine and fecal excretions (Wang,
286
2002). Land use in the Perdido Bay watershed is primarily urban/undeveloped with no livestock
287
agriculture. Fig. 4 shows sample locations 1 and 7 with respect to the likely sources of elevated
288
and other observed enterolactone concentrations in Perdido Bay. There are a number of on-site,
289
individual septic waste treatment systems in the vicinity of location 1 (Fig. 4A). Although there
290
are no available data on the relationship between leaking septic systems and enterolactone
291
concentrations in adjacent surface water bodies, it is reasonable to expect that one or more of
292
these septic systems are responsible for the observed elevated enterolactone concentrations at
293
this location. Fig. 4B shows the proximity of sample location 7 to the Bayou Marcus Water
294
Reclamation Facility (BMWRF), an advanced tertiary wastewater treatment plant permitted to
295
discharge approximately 10 million gallons per day (MGD) of treated municipal wastewater into
296
wetlands west and southwest of the facility (FDEP, 2010). Water discharged into the wetlands
297
flows into both Bayou Marcus Creek and northern Perdido Bay, and is the most likely source of
298
elevated enterolactone concentrations observed at location 7.
299
Very few studies have examined the removal efficiencies of phytoestrogens from
300
wastewater treatment systems.
The overall removal rates of the phytoestrogen daidzein,
301
genistein and coumestrol in two wastewater treatment plants in Rome, Italy were estimated to be
302
>88%, 97%, and 66%, respectively (Bacaloni et al., 2005). Another study found that in two
303
advanced tertiary treatment plants in Australia, very high influent concentrations of daidzein
304
(341–1688 ng L-1), enterodiol (60–834 ng L-1), and enterolactone (581–2111 ng L-1) were
305
reduced by over 99%. A case study in one of these plants showed that the primary removal
306
mechanism was biological treatment using activated sludge (Kang and Price, 2009). Assuming
18
Journal Pre-proof
Fig. 4. Sample locations were elevated enterolactone concentrations were observed: (A) Moccasin Bayou; and (B) Bayou Marcus; (Table 5). 307
similar influent concentrations and removal efficiencies for the Bayou Marcus Water
308
Reclamation Plant results in an expected enterolactone effluent concentration range of 5.8119
Journal Pre-proof
309
21.11 ng L-1, comparable to that observed at location 7 (Table 5).
310
4.0 Conclusions
311
In this study, a rapid, sensitive and reproducible analytical method for the detection and
312
quantitation of 15 target PEPP in estuarine sediment and water was developed and validated
313
using UHPLC-MS/MS. The method provided excellent peak resolution, peak separation, and
314
rapid run times (method separation/total run time: 8/12.5 min). With the exception of resveratrol
315
and enterodiol in 6 sediment samples, percent recoveries of target PEPP obtained in spiking
316
experiments in sediment and water samples were within the acceptable recovery range of 80-
317
120% (Lin et al., 2016) (Table 4). Thus, the developed method is appropriate for quantitative
318
analysis of all target PEPP in estuarine water, but may not be appropriate for quantitative
319
analysis of resveratrol and enterodiol in estuarine sediment (although it is applicable to
320
qualitative analysis of these analytes in sediment). LOD and LOQ values ranged from 0.004 to
321
0.010 ng/injection and 0.013 to 0.032 ng/injection, respectively. The method was used to
322
investigate the presence and distribution of target PEPP in sediment and water in the northern
323
Gulf of Mexico estuary of Perdido Bay. Although no target PEPP were detected in sediment, our
324
results indicated the ubiquitous presence of enterolactone in Perdido Bay surface water, with two
325
areas of higher concentration likely associated with leaking septic systems and discharge from a
326
water treatment plant. However, the ecological significance of the enterolactone concentrations
327
noted in this study is challenging to assess. Enterolactone has been shown to exhibit endocrine
328
modulating effects in vitro and in vivo, exhibiting weak estrogenic activity at low concentrations
329
and weak antiestrogenic activities at higher concentrations (Waters and Knowler, 1982; Mousavi
330
and Adlercreutz, 1992; Wang, 2002; Damdimopoulou et al., 2011). In humans, there is evidence
331
that dietary exposure to enterolactone is positively correlated with reduced risk of breast,
20
Journal Pre-proof
332
prostate, and colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease (Adlercreutz, 2007; Saarinen et al., 2007;
333
Buck et al., 2010). There is also evidence that dietary exposure to enterolactone can delay the
334
onset of puberty in females (Wolff et al., 2017; Greenspan and Lee, 2018). However, studies
335
specifically considering the effects of exposure to enterolactone on wildlife living in natural
336
surface water systems are lacking. Moreover, most natural waters will contain complex mixtures
337
of both natural and anthropogenic compounds, many of which are known or suspected EDCs.
338
Although there is evidence that the combined effects of EDCs having similar properties can be
339
predicted by dose addition, little is known about similar effects from mixtures of chemicals from
340
different classes of EDCs (Kortenkamp, 2007). The method developed and described in this
341
study provides a means for further elucidating the effects of complex EDC mixtures on both
342
humans and wildlife, contributing to our evolving understanding of the potential risks posed by
343
EDCs in environmental systems.
344
Acknowledgements
345
This research was supported by a gift to the Coastal Estuarine Environment Fund for
346
Excellence through the Auburn University Foundation. We greatly appreciate the generous
347
support provided by the donor to this fund. Additional funding was provided by the City of
348
Orange Beach, Alabama and the Auburn University Presidential Awards for Interdisciplinary
349
Research (PAIR). Our thanks are extended to graduate students Danyang Wang, Brian Ross,
350
Roger Viticoski, Meredith Ayers, and Shushan Wu for field and laboratory assistance.
351
References
352
Adlercreutz, H., 2007. Lignans and human health. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences
353
44, 483-525.
21
Journal Pre-proof
354
Bacaloni, A., Cavaliere, C., Faberi, A., Foglia, P., Samperi, R., Laganà, A., 2005. Determination
355
of isoflavones and coumestrol in river water and domestic wastewater sewage treatment plants.
356
Analytica Chimica Acta 531, 229-237.
357
Bacciottini, L., Falchetti, A., Pampaloni, B., Bartolini, E., Carossino, A.M., Brandi, M.L., 2007.
358
Phytoestrogens: food or drug? Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism 4, 123.
359
Beck, I.-C., Bruhn, R., Gandrass, J., Ruck, W., 2005. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass
360
spectrometry analysis of estrogenic compounds in coastal surface water of the Baltic Sea. Journal
361
of Chromatography A 1090, 98-106.
362
Bergman, Å., Heindel, J.J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K.A., Zoeller, R.T., Jobling, S.K., 2013. State of
363
the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012: an assessment of the state of the science of
364
endocrine disruptors prepared by a group of experts for the United Nations Environment
365
Programme and World Health Organization. World Health Organization.
366
Blasco, C., Van Poucke, C., Van Peteghem, C., 2007. Analysis of meat samples for anabolic
367
steroids
368
Chromatography A 1154, 230-239.
369
Boberg, J., Mandrup, K.R., Jacobsen, P.R., Isling, L.K., Hadrup, N., Berthelsen, L., Elleby, A.,
370
Kiersgaard, M., Vinggaard, A.M., Hass, U., Nellemann, C., 2013. Endocrine disrupting effects in
371
rats perinatally exposed to a dietary relevant mixture of phytoestrogens. Reproductive
372
Toxicology 40, 41-51.
373
Buck, K., Zaineddin, A.K., Vrieling, A., Linseisen, J., Chang-Claude, J., 2010. Meta-analyses of
374
lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. The American journal of clinical
375
nutrition 92, 141-153.
residues
by
liquid
chromatography/tandem
22
mass
spectrometry.
Journal
of
Journal Pre-proof
376
Chighizola, C., Meroni, P.L., 2012. The role of environmental estrogens and autoimmunity.
377
Autoimmunity Reviews 11, A493-A501.
378
Clarke, D.B., Bailey, V., Lloyd, A.S., 2008. Determination of phytoestrogens in dietary
379
supplements by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess
380
25, 534-547.
381
Colborn, T., Dumanoski, D., Myers, J.P., 1996. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our
382
Fertility, Intelligence and Survival?--a Scientific Detective Story.
383
Damdimopoulou, P., Nurmi, T., Salminen, A., Damdimopoulos, A.E., Kotka, M., van der Saag,
384
P., Strauss, L., Poutanen, M., Pongratz, I., Mäkelä, S., 2011. A single dose of enterolactone
385
activates estrogen signaling and regulates expression of circadian clock genes in mice. The
386
Journal of nutrition 141, 1583-1589.
387
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.-P., Giudice, L.C., Hauser, R., Prins, G.S., Soto, A.M.,
388
Zoeller, R.T., Gore, A.C., 2009. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society
389
Scientific Statement. Endocrine Reviews 30, 293-342.
390
Dixon, R.A., 2004. PHYTOESTROGENS. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55, 225-261.
391
FDEP, 2010. Permit, Bayou Marcus Water Reclamation Facility.
392
Ferreira-Dias, G., Botelho, M., Zagrajczuk, A., Rebordão, M.R., Galvão, A.M., Bravo, P.P.,
393
Piotrowska-Tomala, K., Szóstek, A.Z., Wiczkowski, W., Piskula, M., Fradinho, M.J.,
394
Skarzynski, D.J., 2013. Coumestrol and its metabolite in mares' plasma after ingestion of
395
phytoestrogen-rich plants: Potent endocrine disruptors inducing infertility. Theriogenology 80,
396
684-692.
397
Fox, J.E., 2004. Chemical Communication Threatened by Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.
398
Environmental Health Perspectives 112, 648-653.
23
Journal Pre-proof
399
Gore, A.C., Chappell, V.A., Fenton, S.E., Flaws, J.A., Nadal, A., Prins, G.S., Toppari, J.,
400
Zoeller, R.T., 2015. Executive Summary to EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific
401
Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocrine Reviews 36, 593-602.
402
Greenspan, L.C., Lee, M.M., 2018. Endocrine disrupters and pubertal timing. Curr Opin
403
Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 25, 49-54.
404
Kang, J., Price, W.E., 2009. Occurrence of phytoestrogens in municipal wastewater and surface
405
waters. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 11, 1477-1483.
406
Kortenkamp, A., 2007. Ten Years of Mixing Cocktails: A Review of Combination Effects of
407
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives 115, 98-105.
408
Kuhnle, G.G.C., Dell’Aquila, C., Aspinall, S.M., Runswick, S.A., Joosen, A.M.C.P., Mulligan,
409
A.A., Bingham, S.A., 2009. Phytoestrogen content of fruits and vegetables commonly consumed
410
in the UK based on LC–MS and 13C-labelled standards. Food Chemistry 116, 542-554.
411
Laganà, A., Bacaloni, A., De Leva, I., Faberi, A., Fago, G., Marino, A., 2004. Analytical
412
methodologies for determining the occurrence of endocrine disrupting chemicals in sewage
413
treatment plants and natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 501, 79-88.
414
Lin, Y., Liu, R., Hu, F., Liu, R., Ruan, T., Jiang, G., 2016. Simultaneous qualitative and
415
quantitative analysis of fluoroalkyl sulfonates in riverine water by liquid chromatography
416
coupled with Orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1435, 66-74.
417
Liu, Z.H., Kanjo, Y., Mizutani, S., 2010. A review of phytoestrogens: their occurrence and fate
418
in the environment. Water Res 44, 567-577.
419
Magiera, S., Baranowska, I., Kusa, J., 2012. Development and validation of UHPLC–ESI-
420
MS/MS method for the determination of selected cardiovascular drugs, polyphenols and their
421
metabolites in human urine. Talanta 89, 47-56.
24
Journal Pre-proof
422
Martin, P.M., Horwitz, K.B., Ryan, D.S., McGUIRE, W.L., 1978. Phytoestrogen interaction with
423
estrogen receptors in human breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 103, 1860-1867.
424
Mazur, W.M., Duke, J.A., Wähälä, K., Rasku, S., Adlercreutz, H., 1998. Isoflavonoids and
425
lignans in legumes: nutritional and health aspects in humans. The Journal of Nutritional
426
Biochemistry 9, 193-200.
427
Michel, T., Halabalaki, M., Skaltsounis, A.L., 2013. New concepts, experimental approaches,
428
and dereplication strategies for the discovery of novel phytoestrogens from natural sources.
429
Planta Med 79, 514-532.
430
Mousavi, Y., Adlercreutz, H., 1992. Enterolactone and estradiol inhibit each other's proliferative
431
effect on MCF-7 breast cancer cells in culture. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and
432
molecular biology 41, 615-619.
433
Mulabagal,
434
chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry quantitative method for trace analysis of potential
435
endocrine disrupting steroid hormones in estuarine sediments. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom
436
31, 419-429.
437
NIEHS, 2016. Endocrine Disruptors. National Institute of Health Sciences.
438
Prasain, J.K., Arabshahi, A., Moore II, D.R., Greendale, G.A., Wyss, J.M., Barnes, S., 2010.
439
Simultaneous determination of 11 phytoestrogens in human serum using a 2 min liquid
440
chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Journal of Chromatography B 878, 994-
441
1002.
442
Quifer-Rada, P., Martinez-Huelamo, M., Jauregui, O., Chiva-Blanch, G., Estruch, R., Lamuela-
443
Raventos, R.M., 2013. Analytical condition setting a crucial step in the quantification of unstable
444
polyphenols in acidic conditions: analyzing prenylflavanoids in biological samples by liquid
V.,
Wilson,
C.,
Hayworth,
25
J.S.,
2017.
An
ultrahigh-performance
Journal Pre-proof
445
chromatography-electrospray ionization triple quadruple mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 85,
446
5547-5554.
447
Ribeiro, A.R., Maia, A., Santos, M., Tiritan, M.E., Ribeiro, C.M.R., 2016. Occurrence of Natural
448
Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Douro River Estuary, Portugal. Archives of
449
environmental contamination and toxicology 70, 361-371.
450
Saarinen, N.M., Wärri, A., Airio, M., Smeds, A., Mäkelä, S., 2007. Role of dietary lignans in the
451
reduction of breast cancer risk. Molecular nutrition & food research 51, 857-866.
452
Setchell, K., Adlercreutz, H., 1988. Mammalian Lignans and Phytooestrogens Recent Studies on
453
their Formation, Metabolism and Biological Role in Health and. Role of the gut flora in toxicity
454
and cancer 315.
455
Shutt, D., Cox, R., 1972. Steroid and phyto-oestrogen binding to sheep uterine receptors in vitro.
456
Journal of Endocrinology 52, 299-310.
457
Stackelberg, P.E., Furlong, E.T., Meyer, M.T., Zaugg, S.D., Henderson, A.K., Reissman, D.B.,
458
2004. Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a
459
conventional drinking-water-treatment plant. Science of The Total Environment 329, 99-113.
460
Verdeal, K., Brown, R.R., Richardson, T., Ryan, D.S., 1980. Affinity of Phytoestrogens for
461
Estradiol-Binding
462
Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Rat Mammary Tumors23. JNCI: Journal of the National
463
Cancer Institute 64, 285-290.
464
Wang, L.-Q., 2002. Mammalian phytoestrogens: enterodiol and enterolactone. Journal of
465
Chromatography B 777, 289-309.
466
Ward, P.S., Thompson, C.B., 2012. Signaling in Control of Cell Growth and Metabolism. Cold
467
Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 4, a006783.
Proteins
and
Effect
of
26
Coumestrol
on
Growth
of
7,12-
Journal Pre-proof
468
Waring, R.H., Ayers, S., Gescher, A.J., Glatt, H.R., Meinl, W., Jarratt, P., Kirk, C.J., Pettitt, T.,
469
Rea, D., Harris, R.M., 2008. Phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens: The contribution of diet and
470
environment to endocrine disruption. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular
471
Biology 108, 213-220.
472
Waters, A., Knowler, J., 1982. Effect of a lignan (HPMF) on RNA synthesis in the rat uterus.
473
Reproduction 66, 379-381.
474
Whitten, P.L., Patisaul, H.B., 2001. Cross-species and interassay comparisons of phytoestrogen
475
action. Environmental health perspectives 109, 5.
476
Wolff, M.S., Pajak, A., Pinney, S.M., Windham, G.C., Galvez, M., Rybak, M., Silva, M.J., Ye,
477
X., Calafat, A.M., Kushi, L.H., Biro, F.M., Teitelbaum, S.L., 2017. Associations of urinary
478
phthalate and phenol biomarkers with menarche in a multiethnic cohort of young girls.
479
Reproductive Toxicology 67, 56-64.
480
Wynne-Edwards, K.E., 2001. Evolutionary biology of plant defenses against herbivory and their
481
predictive implications for endocrine disruptor susceptibility in vertebrates. Environmental
482
Health Perspectives 109, 443.
483
27
Journal Pre-proof
Some phytoestrogenic polyphenolics are known or suspected EDCs Developed MRM method for simultaneous quantitation of target PEPP in estuarine sediment and water Method separation/total run time (8/12.5 min), LOD (0.004 to 0.010 pg/inj), LOQ (0.013 to 0.032 pg/inj) Method used to examine enterolactone distribution in Alabama estuarine waters