G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Pharmacological Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharep 1 2
Review article
3
Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders
4 5
Q1 Marzena
Mac´kowiak *, Patrycja Mordalska, Krzysztof We˛dzony
Laboratory of Pharmacology and Brain Biostructure, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krako´w, Poland
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history: Received 24 January 2014 Received in revised form 17 April 2014 Accepted 22 April 2014 Available online xxx
Neuroligins are postsynaptic adhesion molecules that are involved in the regulation of synapse organisation and function. Four neuroligin proteins have been identified (neuroligin 1, 2, 3, 4), which are differentially enriched in the postsynaptic specialisation of synapses. Neuroligin 1 is localised on excitatory (glutamatergic) synapses, whereas neuroligin 2 is located on inhibitory (GABAergic/ glycinergic) synapses. Neuroligin 3 and 4 are present on both types of synapses. Recent data indicate that neuroligins are involved in synapse maturation and specification. Because of their synaptic localisation and function, neuroligins control the balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Animal studies with neuroligin transgenic mice showed the involvement of neuroligin 1 in memory formation, and neuroligin 2, 3 or 4 in social behaviour. Interestingly, genetic analysis of humans showed a mutation in the neuroligin 2 gene in schizophrenic patients, while mutations in neuroligin 3 or 4 genes were found in autism. ß 2014 Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. on behalf of Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences.
Keywords: Cell adhesion molecules Neuroligin Synapse Autism Schizophrenia
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Contents Neuroligin family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Neuroligins at the excitatory synapses . . . . Neuroligins at the inhibitory synapses . . . . Excitatory and inhibitory synapse balance . Neuropsychiatric disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Autism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Neuroligin 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Neuroligin 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Neuroligin 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Neuroligin 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schizophrenia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conflict of interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
25
Neuroligin family
Abbreviations: ASDs, autism spectrum disorders; GABA, g-aminobutyric acid; LTP, long-term potentiation; mEPSC, miniature excitatory postsynaptic current; mIPSC, miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; PSD-95, postsynaptic density protein-95; sPSC, spontaneous postsynaptic current. * Corresponding author. E-mail address:
[email protected] (M. Mac´kowiak).
26
Neuroligins are postsynaptic transmembrane adhesion pro- Q227 teins that are comprised of several domains including a cleaved 28 signal peptide, a cholinesterase-like domain, a carbohydrate 29 attachment region, a single transmembrane domain, and a short 30 C-terminal tail containing a type I PDZ-binding motif (for review 31 see Sudhof [1]). Neuroligin proteins have been found in several 32
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011 1734-1140/ß 2014 Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. on behalf of Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences.
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 M. Mac´kowiak et al. / Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
2
Excitatory synapse
Inhibitory synapse
Neuroligins at the inhibitory synapses
80
Presynapc membrane
Presynapc membrane
Neuroligin 2 is known to be constitutively and selectively present at inhibitory postsynaptic specialisations [11]. Neuroligin 2 is localised at both GABA-ergic and glycinergic inhibitory synapses [12,13]. Neuroligin 2 preferentially binds the inhibitory synapse scaffold protein gephyrin through a conserved cytoplasmic motif [13], and it is able to cluster GABAA receptors [14] (Fig. 1). In addition to neuroligin 2, neuroligin 3 and 4 were also found at inhibitory synapses [10,15]; however, they are not specific markers for inhibitory synapses (see above). Neuroligin 3 was observed at GABA-ergic synapses [10], while neuroligin 4 was localised at glycinergic synapses [15].
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Excitatory and inhibitory synapse balance
92
Proper brain function is based on a balance between excitation and inhibition, which are mainly mediated by two major neurotransmitters, glutamate and GABA, respectively. The total number of synapses formed and ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synaptic inputs a neuron receives are factors critical for determining neuronal excitability [16]. Molecules that are involved in the control of a balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation are important for proper neuronal excitability and function. Several findings indicate that neuroligins are involved in both excitatory and inhibitory synapse maturation and specificity, and they are able to control the balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation [5]. An in vitro study showed that the suppression of single (neuroligin 1 or 2 or 3) or multiple neuroligin isoform (neuroligins 1–3) expression in cultured rat hippocampal neurons results in a loss of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. However, electrophysiological analysis demonstrated a predominant reduction of inhibitory synaptic function and alteration in normal excitatory/inhibitory balance in hippocampal neurons [6]. The largest changes in inhibitory synaptic transmission than excitatory transmission were also observed in an electrophysiological study in neuroligin knockout mice [7]. It was found that the deletion neuroligins 1–3 dramatically changed the balance between glutamatergic and GABAergic/glycinergic spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSC) in brainstem neurons, with a strong decrease in GABAergic/ glycinergic sPSC, without affecting the total synapse numbers [7]. In contrast, exogenous neuroligin 1 increased both excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic contacts and the frequency of miniature excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC and mIPSC, respectively) in the cultured hippocampal neurons [17]. Thus, the above data indicate that the proper level of neuroligin proteins seems to be an important factor in the control of the excitatory and inhibitory balance in the brain, and the decrease in neuroligin levels mainly influence the inhibitory transmission. The fact that all single neuroligin knockout mice as well as all combinations of double neuroligin knockouts were viable, whereas neuroligin 1–3 triple knockout mice died shortly after birth, may indicate a significant degree of functional redundancy among neuroligins [7]. The above observation was also confirmed by the results from an in vitro study showing that the overexpression of all neuroligin isoforms is able to stimulate the formation of both excitatory and inhibitory terminals [6]. On the other hand, the study with transgenic mice showed that the overexpression of neuroligin 1 increased the maturation of excitatory synapses [18]. However, there were no differences in the number and size of glutamatergic and GABAergic hippocampal synapses in neuroligin 1 knockout mice when compared to wild-type animals [19]. In contrast, a decrease in GABAergic but not glutamatergic transmission was found in neuroligin 2 knockout mice [12,13]. The role of neuroligin 2 in the control of inhibitory synapse function was also
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Neurexin
Neurexin
NMDA-R
Neuroligin 1
GABAA-R
PSD-95 Postsynapc membrane
Neuroligin 2 Gephyrin
Postsynapc membrane
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of neuroligin binding with neurexin (presynaptic membrane) and postsynaptic scaffolding proteins (PSD-95, gephyrin).
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
species, including humans, rodents, and chickens. Five genes encoding neuroligin proteins have been identified in the human genome (NLGN1, NLGN2, NLGN3, NLGN4, NLGN4Y), and at least four genes coding neuroligin family members have been known in rodents (NLGN1-4). Sequence comparisons indicate that neuroligins 1, 3, and 4 are more similar to each other than to neuroligin 2 [1,2]. Neuroligins link the presynapse to the postsynaptic density by binding through the extracellular cholinesterase-like domain to their presynaptic partners, neurexins, in an alternative splicedependent manner. At the postsynaptic portion, neuroligins bind by their C-terminus with the third PDZ domain of a postsynaptic scaffold protein, such as the postsynaptic density protein-95 (PSD95), which anchors a variety of signalling molecules and surface receptors [1–3] (Fig. 1). It has been suggested that the extracellular domain of neuroligin is sufficient to induce the assembly of functional presynaptic terminals, while the intracellular domain is required for terminal maturation [4]. Several findings indicate that neuroligins are present at developing and mature synapses of the brain and play an important role in synapse organisation and function [1,3,5]. They were initially thought to be required for synapse formation [6], but recent findings indicate their crucial involvement in synapse maturation and specification [7]. It was found that neuroligins are differentially enriched in the postsynaptic specialisations of synapses, and they are found on either excitatory or inhibitory synapses.
60
Neuroligins at the excitatory synapses
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
Neuroligin 1 proteins are exclusively localised on excitatory synapses [8]. This observation is supported by the facts that the neuronal localisation, subcellular distribution and developmental expression of this protein are connected with the excitatory postsynaptic marker protein PSD-95 and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Fig. 1). Moreover, electron microscopy study demonstrated that only asymmetric synapses contain neuroligin 1, and immunofluorescence labelling showed that neuroligin 1 colocalises with glutamatergic but not with g-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic synapses [8]. An in vitro study also showed the coaggregation of neuroligin 1 with PSD-95 (scaffold protein of excitatory synapses), but not gephyrin (scaffold protein of inhibitory synapses) in cultured neurons [9]. A similar effect was observed for neuroligin 3 and neuroligin 4, which suggests that these two proteins are also expressed on excitatory synapses [9]. Additional studies confirmed the presence of neuroligin 3 on glutamatergic synapses in the brain and coimmunoprecipitation studies revealed the occurrence of neuroligin1–neuroligin3 complexes in the brain extracts [10].
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 M. Mac´kowiak et al. / Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208
confirmed by the data from a study of transgenic mice that demonstrated that the enhanced expression of neuroligin 2 results in a significant increase in the density of symmetric (inhibitory) synapses in cortical areas, followed by a small significant change in excitatory synapse morphology [20]. The above results demonstrate that although the expression of neuroligin isoforms is specific for the type of synapse, they are also able to functionally replace each other. The differences in the synaptic localisation of distinct neuroligins suggest the presence of cellular processes involved in maintaining the excitatory/inhibitory balance by controlling the trafficking of different neuroligin isoforms to specific synaptic sites. Current evidence indicates an important role for both the extracellular and intracellular domains of neuroligins in their synaptic localisation. Several findings suggest that neuroligins mediate their effects on excitatory or inhibitory synapse development through trans-synaptic interaction with neurexins. Alterations in the extracellular domains of neuroligins (1, 2, 3) or neurexin-1b affected excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation [9,21,22]. However, recent data have also shown that the targeting of neuroligins to specific postsynaptic sites is determined by postsynaptic scaffolding molecules, which bind to the C-terminal PDZ-binding domain of neuroligins [23]. It was found that the postsynaptic complex of scaffolding protein PSD-95 and neuroligin can modulate the release of transmitter from vesicles at the synapse in a retrograde way [24] and link postsynaptic and presynaptic function. It was also suggested that not only the expression of neuroligins but also the interaction between neuroligins and PSD-95 regulate the balance of excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation [17]. PSD-95 restricts the localisation and effects of neuroligin 1 to excitatory synapses [17]. The overexpression of PSD-95 increased the level of neuroligin 1, but it could also shift the localisation of neuroligin 2 from inhibitory to excitatory contacts, reducing mIPSC frequency [9,17,22]. In addition, a decrease of the endogenous level of PSD-95 by siRNA administration shifts neuroligin 1 from excitatory to inhibitory synapses [25], while the knockdown of PSD-95 leads only to a partial shift of neuroligin 2 and neuroligin 3 from excitatory to inhibitory synapses [26], most likely because these neuroligins are already expressed on inhibitory synapses. The above data indicate that the PSD-95 level might be a main factor in determining the recruitment of neuroligins to excitatory versus inhibitory synapses, especially neuroligin 1. Recent evidence indicates that neuroligin 2 preferentially binds to inhibitory postsynaptic scaffolding molecules, such as gephyrin and collybistin, and the deletion of neuroligin 2 in mice disturbs GABAergic and glycinergic transmission [13]. Moreover, the siRNA-mediated deactivation of gephyrin leads to a shift of endogenous neuroligin 2 from inhibitory to excitatory synaptic contacts [26]. The above results might suggest that neuroligin 2 can bind to both inhibitory (gephyrin) and excitatory (PSD-95) postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, but it preferentially binds to gephyrin, most likely due to its higher affinity to inhibitory than excitatory scaffolding proteins. Interestingly, it was also shown that knockdown of neuroligin 2 evoked a reduction in glutamatergic events (i.e., the decrease in mEPSC) and dendritic spines, which was rescued by the overexpression of a chloride transporter, KCC2, together with neuroligin 2 shRNA [27]. KCC2 controls intracellular Cl concentration by pumping Cl outside neurons (for review, see Blaesse et al. [28]). Moreover, independent of its Cl transport function, KCC2 was also found to regulate dendritic spine maturation and excitatory synapse development by interacting with the spine cytoskeleton [29]. It was shown that the KCC2 C-terminal domain binds to the cytoskeleton-associated protein 4.1 N [29], which is known to play an important role in mediating structural interactions between the cytoskeleton,
3
transmembrane proteins and adhesion molecules [30]. The above data suggest that neuroligin 2 not only regulates GABAergic synapses but also influences glutamatergic synapses by switching the bond with inhibitory to excitatory postsynaptic scaffolding proteins or by regulating KCC2 function. It seems that neuroligin 2 might be an important regulator in balancing GABAergic and glutamatergic functions in the brain. The last observation might be supported by data showing that the chronic inhibition of general synaptic activity suppresses the synapse-boosting activity of neuroligin 2, whereas the selective chronic inhibition of glutamatergic synapse components, such as NMDA receptors or their downstream signals, suppresses the synaptic-boosting activity of neuroligin 1 [31]. Thus, neuroligins specify and validate synapses via an activity-dependent mechanism, with different neuroligins acting on distinct types of synapses.
209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223
Neuropsychiatric disease
224
Cell adhesion molecules are known to be involved in the pathomechanism of some neuropsychiatric disorders [1,32]. Several neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), some forms of mental retardation and schizophrenia, are known to be caused by shifts in excitatory and inhibitory balance [1]. The factors involved in the regulation of excitatory and inhibitory synapse balance might play an important role in disease development and also might be potential targets for new therapeutic strategies. As it was mentioned above, neuroligins participate in the regulation of excitatory and inhibitory balance, and because of that, several genetic and functional studies have been performed to determine the role of neuroligins in some neuropsychiatric diseases.
225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
Autism
238
ASDs include idiopathic autism, Asperger’s syndrome or Rett syndrome [1]. The diagnosis of ASDs is based on the presence of two major symptoms: social-communication deficits and restricted and repetitive interests/behaviours. Moreover, ASDs are also associated with sensory and motor abnormalities, sleep disturbance, attention deficits, intellectual disability and mood disorders such as anxiety (for review, see Grzadzinski et al. [33]). The first symptoms of ASDs are typically observed in children before 2–3 years of age. ASDs are heritable in 80% of cases, which suggest that ASDs are largely determined by genes [1]. Genetic studies discovered mutations in the genes encoding neuroligin 3 and neuroligin 4 in patients with ASDs. A single mutation in the neuroligin 3 gene (the R451C substitution) and ten different mutations in the neuroligin 4 gene were detected. In addition, five different larger deletions of X-chromosomal DNA that included the neuroligin 4 locus were found in autism patients [1,34–39]. It is of interest that an in vitro study also showed that neuroligin 4X deletion resulted in neurodevelopmental defects and decreased gene expression of other neuroligins (neuroligin 1 and 3) [40]. Thus, the mutation in neuroligin genes may affect the neurodevelopmental process inducing disease symptoms, for example ASDs. Many genetic and non-genetic animals models of ASDs have been characterised and used to identify the aetiology of ASDs and to develop novel treatment (for review, see Won et al. [41]). Using these models, some animal behaviour similar to the symptoms observed in ASDs have been analysed, such as sociability and social novelty recognition, ultrasonic vocalisation showing the communication patterns, restricted interest or repetitive behaviour [41]. The role of neuroligins in ASD development was investigated in transgenic animals (Table 1).
239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 M. Mac´kowiak et al. / Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
4
Table 1 The phenotypes of transgenic mice with altered neuroligin expression. The behavioural parameters were measured in knockout (KO), knockin (KI) or mice with neuroligin overexpression (OE); N/A – not analysed. Neuroligins
Transgenic mice
Autism spectrum disorder-like phenotype Social interaction
Social communication
Repetitive behaviour
Other functional impairments
References
Neuroligin 1 (NLG1)
NLG1- KO NLG1-OE
Minimal impairment N/A
N/A N/A
Enhancement N/A
Learning and memory deficits Learning and memory deficits
[19,42] [18]
Neuroligin 2 (NLG2)
NLG2-KO NLG2-OE
Normal Impairment
Reduced calls N/A
Normal Enhancement
Anxiety Anxiety
[43,44] [20]
Neuroligin 3 (NLG3)
NLG3-KO
Impairment
Reduced calls
Normal
[47]
NLG3R451C-KI
Impairment
Increased calls
N/A
Hyperactivity Alterations in learning and memory processes Enhanced learning ability
Neuroligin 4 (NLG4)
NLG4-KO
Impairment
Reduced calls
Normal
N/A
[54]
[49]
such as reduction in ultrasound vocalisation and a lack of social novelty preference [47]. A decrease in the freezing response in contextual and cued fear conditioning, but increased learning ability during the reversal task of the Morris water maze, was also observed in neuroligin 3 knockout mice [47]. Recent experiments with mice having a R451C mutation in neuroligin 3 previously found in patients with autism disorders [37,38] showed that the R451C mutation of neuroligin 3 does not alter neuroligin 3 mRNA levels, but decreases the export of the neuroligin 3 protein from the endoplasmic reticulum [48]. Therefore, a decrease in neuroligin 3 concentration was observed in the synapses of mice with the R451C mutation [49]. The animals with the neuroligin 3 R451C mutation showed impaired social interaction [49,50], but enhanced spatial learning abilities [49]. They also showed increased inhibitory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus in early postnatal life [51] and in the adult somatosensory cortex [49]. However, in the adult hippocampus of neuroligin 3 R451C mutated mice, an increase in AMPA receptor-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission, an alteration in the kinetics of NMDA receptordependent synaptic response, and the enhancement of LTP were observed [50]. In contrast, the neuroligin 3 R704C mutation selectively decreased the AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in hippocampus, without changing NMDA or GABA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission [52]. Thus, neuroligin 3 is involved in the regulation of both inhibitory and excitatory transmission by changing AMPA receptor function. By controlling the recruitment of AMPA receptors to the postsynaptic membrane, neuroligin 3 is involved in a critical process in excitatory synapse maturation [53]. These results are also in line with immunohistochemical data showing the presence of the neuroligin 3 protein of either glutamatergic or GABAergic synapses [10], and they also confirm the role of neuroligin 3 in the control of excitatory/ inhibitory balance, which is impaired in ASDs.
315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347
Neuroligin 4
348
Available data indicate that neuroligin 4 knockout mice also exhibit highly selective deficits in reciprocal social interactions and communications reminiscent of autism in humans. They also showed a slight reduction in the total brain volume [47,54]. Such knockout mice are considered to be a mouse model of monogenic heritable autism [54]. The animal study might be supported by genetic findings showing the possibility of the involvement of neuroligin 4 gene mutations in autism and cognitive disability [38].
349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356
Neuroligin 3
Schizophrenia
357
Neuroligin 3 knockout mice showed a slight reduction in the total brain volume [47]. Neuroligin 3 deficient mice display a behavioural phenotype reminiscent of the main symptoms of ASD,
Similar to ASDs, schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder with cognitive disabilities [55]. The onset of schizophrenia is usually observed in late adolescence or early adulthood; however,
358 359 360
270
Neuroligin 1
271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
Neuroligin 1 knockout mice exhibited an increase in repetitive, stereotyped grooming behaviour, most likely associated with a reduced NMDA/AMPA receptor ratio in cortico-striatal synapses [19]. Moreover, a slight decrease in social interaction was also found [19]. Neuroligin 1 knockout mice also display deficits in spatial learning and memory that correlate with impaired hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) [19]. In addition, deficits in the storage of associative fear memory in fear conditioning tasks were discovered in neuroligin 1 knockout mice [42]. The transgenic mice with neuroligin 1 overexpression showed deficits in memory acquisition, but not retrieval. Moreover, a shift in the synaptic activity towards increased excitation as well as the impairment in LTP induction was observed in electrophysiological studies [18]. The obtained date indicated that the proper neuroligin 1 level, especially in the hippocampus, was critical for memory formation. Moreover, the results also suggest that the impairment of the neuroligin 1 level might induce the development of symptoms specific for autism (repetitive behaviour) but also might be involved in the cognitive disability observed in ASDs.
290
Neuroligin 2
291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310
Neuroligin 2 knockout mice showed an increase in anxiety-like behaviour, a decrease in pain sensitivity and a slight deficit in motor coordination [43]. The mice with neuroligin 2 deletions displayed normal social behaviour, but developmental delays and a reduction in pup ultrasonic vocalisation was observed [44]. The above changes in the mouse behaviour might be related to modifications in inhibitory transmission because the deletion of neuroligin 2 evoked alterations in GABAergic and glycinergic synaptic transmission and led to a loss of postsynaptic specialisations, specifically at perisomatic inhibitory synapses [13]. However, neuroligin 2 overexpression in transgenic mice resulted in stereotypical jumping behaviour, anxiety and impairment in social interaction [20]. Moreover, neuroligin 2 overexpression in the rat hippocampus led to reduced aggression and novel reactivity, but had no impact on sociability and memory [45]. Some evidence also indicates that the reduced sociability and increased aggression observed in rats following chronic restraint stress is induced by a decrease in the hippocampal neuroligin 2 but not neuroligin 1 expression [46]. Thus, the above results indicate that the modulation of the neuroligin 2 protein level might affect social and emotional behaviour.
311 312 313 314
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 M. Mac´kowiak et al. / Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413
the symptoms are considered to be the result of early life developmental disruptions. The sings of schizophrenia include both positive (delusion, hallucination) and negative symptoms (poor speech, social withdrawal, blunt affect). Genetic epidemiological studies showed that schizophrenia is a complex disease [56], and the meta-analytic results from twin studies showed heritability at approximately 70–80% [57]. Among several investigated genes, mutations in the neuroligin 2 [58] and neuroligin 4 [59] genes were found in schizophrenia patients. Screening for mutations in the exon and promoter of the neuroligin 2 gene in schizophrenic patients identified six point mutations: R215H, V510M, R621H, A637T, P800L and A819S [58]. Functional studies in the HEK 293T-neuron co-culture system using immunocytochemistry and electrophysiological recordings revealed that the R215H mutant was unable to develop GABAergic synapse formation due to a severe defect in intracellular trafficking [58]. The above finding indicates the importance of neuroligin 2 in the formation of functional inhibitory synapses. Moreover, the disruption of GABAergic transmission is observed in schizophrenia and defects in inhibitory circuit function contribute to working memory impairments observed in schizophrenia [56]. In addition, a recent genetic study also noted rare exonic deletions in the gephyrin gene as a risk factor for schizophrenia [60]. As it was mentioned above, gephyrin is an inhibitory postsynaptic scaffolding protein that is involved with the neuroligin 2 protein in GABAergic synapse formation. Thus, this might suggest that changes in the neuroligin 2 and gephyrin protein levels due to genetic mutations affect the proper development of inhibitory synapses in the schizophrenic brain. The preliminary study of neuroligin 2 in an animal neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia based on the postnatal administration of an NMDA receptor antagonist showed the changes in neuroligin 2 protein levels in the medial prefrontal cortex in adolescent, but not adult rats [61]. An example of neuroligin 2 immunostaining in the rat medial prefrontal cortex is shown in Fig. 2. The above evidence indicates that alterations in the neuroligin 2 protein level induced by genetic or environmental (pharmacological) factors might have resulted in impairments in inhibitory synapse development, most likely during adolescence, and might have caused the deficit in GABAergic transmission observed in the brains of adult schizophrenic patients [56]. The screening for neuroligin 4 gene truncating and transmembrane domain mutations in schizophrenic patients was also investigated [59]. The results showed that the transmembrane domain is more likely involved in the aetiology of schizophrenia than the truncating mutations of the neuroligin 4 gene [59]. It is also of interest that the deletion in neuroligin 4 gene was also found in autistic patients [36]. The same relationship was found in relation to the gephyrin gene [60]. Moreover, the mice with altered neuroligin 2 protein levels showed some autistic-like symptoms [20]. Recent clinical data indicate that some patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia have autistic symptoms, and these symptoms co-vary with negative symptoms, but not positive
Fig. 2. Neuroligin 2 immunostaining in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPC). (A) The distribution of neuroligin 2 in the mPFC. (B) The examples of neuroligin 2 immunoreactive cell (asterisk) and puncta in the neuropil (arrows). The scale bars are 500 mm (A) or 50 mm (B).
5
symptoms of schizophrenia [36,62]. Thus, it is conceivable that alterations in the same genes (i.e., neuroligin 4, neuroligin 2 or gephyrin) might be involved in the symptoms of schizophrenia and autism, which are both neurodevelopmental disorders with cognitive deficits.
414 415 416 417 418
Conclusions
419
The collected data indicate that neuroligins are involved in maturation and synapse specification. The main factors determining their synaptic localisation are presynaptic neurexins and postsynaptic scaffolding proteins (PSD-95, gephyrin). The neuroligins’ ability to control the balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapses makes them an interesting target in the investigation of the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. So far, a functional study using a transgenic animal model with impairments of neuroligin protein levels (knockout, knockin and overexpressed mice) showed the involvement of neuroligins in memory processes, and also in social and emotional behaviour. Moreover, genetic analysis of people showing symptoms of some neurodevelopmental disorders indicate that alterations of the neuroligin structure might be involved in the pathomechanism of psychotic disorders such as autism or schizophrenia.
420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434
Funding
435
This work was supported by Grant No. POIG.01.01.02.-12-004/ 09 ‘‘Depression-Mechanism-Therapy’’ (part 2.2. to MM).
436 437
Conflict of interest
438
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
439
References
440
[1] Sudhof TC. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 2008;455:903–11. [2] Ichtchenko K, Nguyen T, Sudhof TC. Structures, alternative splicing, and neurexin binding of multiple neuroligins. J Biol Chem 1996;271:2676–82. [3] Lise MF, El-Husseini A. The neuroligin and neurexin families: from structure to function at the synapse. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006;63:1833–49. [4] Wittenmayer N, Korber C, Liu H, Kremer T, Varoqueaux F, Chapman ER, et al. Postsynaptic Neuroligin1 regulates presynaptic maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:13564–69. [5] Levinson JN, El-Husseini A. Building excitatory and inhibitory synapses: balancing neuroligin partnerships. Neuron 2005;48:171–4. [6] Chih B, Engelman H, Scheiffele P. Control of excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation by neuroligins. Science 2005;307:1324–8. [7] Varoqueaux F, Aramuni G, Rawson RL, Mohrmann R, Missler M, Gottmann K, et al. Neuroligins determine synapse maturation and function. Neuron 2006;51:741–54. [8] Song JY, Ichtchenko K, Sudhof TC, Brose N. Neuroligin 1 is a postsynaptic celladhesion molecule of excitatory synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:1100–5. [9] Graf ER, Zhang X, Jin SX, Linhoff MW, Craig AM. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell 2004;119:1013–26. [10] Budreck EC, Scheiffele P. Neuroligin-3 is a neuronal adhesion protein at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses. Eur J Neurosci 2007;26:1738–48. [11] Varoqueaux F, Jamain S, Brose N. Neuroligin 2 is exclusively localized to inhibitory synapses. Eur J Cell Biol 2004;83:449–56. [12] Hoon M, Bauer G, Fritschy JM, Moser T, Falkenburger BH, Varoqueaux F. Neuroligin 2 controls the maturation of GABAergic synapses and information processing in the retina. J Neurosci 2009;29:8039–50. [13] Poulopoulos A, Aramuni G, Meyer G, Soykan T, Hoon M, Papadopoulos T, et al. Neuroligin 2 drives postsynaptic assembly at perisomatic inhibitory synapses through gephyrin and collybistin. Neuron 2009;63:628–42. [14] Dong N, Qi J, Chen G. Molecular reconstitution of functional GABAergic synapses with expression of neuroligin-2 and GABAA receptors. Mol Cell Neurosci 2007;35:14–23. [15] Hoon M, Soykan T, Falkenburger B, Hammer M, Patrizi A, Schmidt KF, et al. Neuroligin-4 is localized to glycinergic postsynapses and regulates inhibition in the retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:3053–8. [16] Schummers J, Marino J, Sur M. Synaptic integration by V1 neurons depends on location within the orientation map. Neuron 2002;36:969–78.
441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
G Model
PHAREP 120 1–6 6
481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548
M. Mac´kowiak et al. / Pharmacological Reports xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
[17] Prange O, Wong TP, Gerrow K, Wang YT, El-Husseini A. A balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapses is controlled by PSD-95 and neuroligin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:13915–20. [18] Dahlhaus R, Hines RM, Eadie BD, Kannangara TS, Hines DJ, Brown CE, et al. Overexpression of the cell adhesion protein neuroligin-1 induces learning deficits and impairs synaptic plasticity by altering the ratio of excitation to inhibition in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2010;20:305–22. [19] Blundell J, Blaiss CA, Etherton MR, Espinosa F, Tabuchi K, Walz C, et al. Neuroligin-1 deletion results in impaired spatial memory and increased repetitive behavior. J Neurosci 2010;30:2115–29. [20] Hines RM, Wu L, Hines DJ, Steenland H, Mansour S, Dahlhaus R, et al. Synaptic imbalance, stereotypies, and impaired social interactions in mice with altered neuroligin 2 expression. J Neurosci 2008;28:6055–67. [21] Chih B, Afridi SK, Clark L, Scheiffele P. Disorder-associated mutations lead to functional inactivation of neuroligins. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:1471–7. [22] Levinson JN, Chery N, Huang K, Wong TP, Gerrow K, Kang R, et al. Neuroligins mediate excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation: involvement of PSD-95 and neurexin-1beta in neuroligin-induced synaptic specificity. J Biol Chem 2005;280:17312–19. [23] Irie M, Hata Y, Takeuchi M, Ichtchenko K, Toyoda A, Hirao K, et al. Binding of neuroligins to PSD-95. Science 1997;277:1511–5. [24] Futai K, Kim MJ, Hashikawa T, Scheiffele P, Sheng M, Hayashi Y. Retrograde modulation of presynaptic release probability through signaling mediated by PSD-95-neuroligin. Nat Neurosci 2007;10:186–95. [25] Gerrow K, Romorini S, Nabi SM, Colicos MA, Sala C, El-Husseini A. A preformed complex of postsynaptic proteins is involved in excitatory synapse development. Neuron 2006;49:547–62. [26] Levinson JN, Li R, Kang R, Moukhles H, El-Husseini A, Bamji SX. Postsynaptic scaffolding molecules modulate the localization of neuroligins. Neuroscience 2010;165:782–93. [27] Sun C, Zhang L, Chen G. An unexpected role of neuroligin-2 in regulating KCC2 and GABA functional switch. Mol Brain 2013;6:23. [28] Blaesse P, Airaksinen MS, Rivera C, Kaila K. Cation-chloride cotransporters and neuronal function. Neuron 2009;61:820–38. [29] Li H, Khirug S, Cai C, Ludwig A, Blaesse P, Kolikova J, et al. KCC2 interacts with the dendritic cytoskeleton to promote spine development. Neuron 2007;56:1019–33. [30] Hoover KB, Bryant PJ. The genetics of the protein 4.1 family: organizers of the membrane and cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2000;12:229–34. [31] Chubykin AA, Atasoy D, Etherton MR, Brose N, Kavalali ET, Gibson JR, et al. Activity-dependent validation of excitatory versus inhibitory synapses by neuroligin-1 versus neuroligin-2. Neuron 2007;54:919–31. [32] Wedzony K, Chocyk A, Mackowiak M. Potential roles of NCAM/PSA-NCAM proteins in depression and the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs. Pharmacol Rep 2013;65:1471–8. [33] Grzadzinski R, Huerta M, Lord C. DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes. Mol Autism 2013;4:12. [34] Jamain S, Quach H, Betancur C, Rastam M, Colineaux C, Gillberg IC, et al. Mutations of the X-linked genes encoding neuroligins NLGN3 and NLGN4 are associated with autism. Nat Genet 2003;34:27–9. [35] Laumonnier F, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Gomot M, Blanc R, David A, Moizard MP, et al. X-linked mental retardation and autism are associated with a mutation in the NLGN4 gene, a member of the neuroligin family. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:552–7. [36] Lawson-Yuen A, Saldivar JS, Sommer S, Picker J. Familial deletion within NLGN4 associated with autism and Tourette syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2008;16:614–8. [37] Talebizadeh Z, Lam DY, Theodoro MF, Bittel DC, Lushington GH, Butler MG. Novel splice isoforms for NLGN3 and NLGN4 with possible implications in autism. J Med Genet 2006;43:e21. [38] Yan J, Oliveira G, Coutinho A, Yang C, Feng J, Katz C, et al. Analysis of the neuroligin 3 and 4 genes in autism and other neuropsychiatric patients. Mol Psychiatry 2005;10:329–32. [39] Yan J, Feng J, Schroer R, Li W, Skinner C, Schwartz CE, et al. Analysis of the neuroligin 4Y gene in patients with autism. Psychiatr Genet 2008;18:204–7. [40] Shi L, Chang X, Zhang P, Coba MP, Lu W, Wang K. The functional genetic link of NLGN4X knockdown and neurodevelopment in neural stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 2013;22:3749–60.
[41] Won H, Mah W, Kim E. Autism spectrum disorder causes, mechanisms, and treatments: focus on neuronal synapses. Front Mol Neurosci 2013;6:19. [42] Kim J, Jung SY, Lee YK, Park S, Choi JS, Lee CJ, et al. Neuroligin-1 is required for normal expression of LTP and associative fear memory in the amygdala of adult animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:9087–92. [43] Blundell J, Tabuchi K, Bolliger MF, Blaiss CA, Brose N, Liu X, et al. Increased anxiety-like behavior in mice lacking the inhibitory synapse cell adhesion molecule neuroligin 2. Genes Brain Behav 2009;8:114–26. [44] Wohr M, Silverman JL, Scattoni ML, Turner SM, Harris MJ, Saxena R, et al. Developmental delays and reduced pup ultrasonic vocalizations but normal Q3 sociability in mice lacking the postsynaptic cell adhesion protein neuroligin2. Behav Brain Res 2012. [45] Kohl C, Riccio O, Grosse J, Zanoletti O, Fournier C, Schmidt MV, et al. Hippocampal neuroligin-2 overexpression leads to reduced aggression and inhibited novelty reactivity in rats. PLoS One 2013;8:e56871. [46] van der Kooij MA, Fantin M, Kraev I, Korshunova I, Grosse J, Zanoletti O, et al. Impaired hippocampal neuroligin-2 function by chronic stress or synthetic peptide treatment is linked to social deficits and increased aggression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014;39:1148–58. [47] Radyushkin K, Hammerschmidt K, Boretius S, Varoqueaux F, El-Kordi A, Ronnenberg A, et al. Neuroligin-3-deficient mice: model of a monogenic heritable form of autism with an olfactory deficit. Genes Brain Behav 2009;8:416–25. [48] Comoletti D, De JA, Jennings LL, Flynn RE, Gaietta G, Tsigelny I, et al. The Arg451Cys-neuroligin-3 mutation associated with autism reveals a defect in protein processing. J Neurosci 2004;24:4889–93. [49] Tabuchi K, Blundell J, Etherton MR, Hammer RE, Liu X, Powell CM, et al. A neuroligin-3 mutation implicated in autism increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice. Science 2007;318:71–6. [50] Etherton M, Foldy C, Sharma M, Tabuchi K, Liu X, Shamloo M, et al. Autismlinked neuroligin-3 R451C mutation differentially alters hippocampal and cortical synaptic function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:13764–69. [51] Pizzarelli R, Cherubini E. Developmental regulation of GABAergic signalling in the hippocampus of neuroligin 3 R451C knock-in mice: an animal model of Autism. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;7:85. [52] Etherton MR, Tabuchi K, Sharma M, Ko J, Sudhof TC. An autism-associated point mutation in the neuroligin cytoplasmic tail selectively impairs AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in hippocampus. EMBO J 2011;30:2908–19. [53] McMahon SA, Diaz E. Mechanisms of excitatory synapse maturation by transsynaptic organizing complexes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011;21:221–7. [54] Jamain S, Radyushkin K, Hammerschmidt K, Granon S, Boretius S, Varoqueaux F, et al. Reduced social interaction and ultrasonic communication in a mouse model of monogenic heritable autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:1710–5. [55] Fatemi SH, Folsom TD. The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia, revisited. Schizophr Bull 2009;35:528–48. [56] Lewis DA, Gonzalez-Burgos G. Neuroplasticity of neocortical circuits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33:141–65. [57] Sullivan PF, Kendler KS, Neale MC. Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:1187–92. [58] Sun C, Cheng MC, Qin R, Liao DL, Chen TT, Koong FJ, et al. Identification and functional characterization of rare mutations of the neuroligin-2 gene (NLGN2) associated with schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:3042–51. [59] Sand P, Langguth B, Hajak G, Perna M, Prikryl R, Kucerova H, et al. Screening for Neuroligin 4 (NLGN4) truncating and transmembrane domain mutations in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2006;82:277–8. [60] Lionel AC, Vaags AK, Sato D, Gazzellone MJ, Mitchell EB, Chen HY, et al. Rare exonic deletions implicate the synaptic organizer Gephyrin (GPHN) in risk for autism, schizophrenia and seizures. Hum Mol Genet 2013;22:2055–66. [61] Mordalska P, Bator E, Mac´kowiak M, Wedzony K. Impairment of synaptic adhesion molecule expression in the medial prefrontal cortex in the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;21:S191. [62] Sheitman BB, Kraus JE, Bodfish JW, Carmel H. Are the negative symptoms of schizophrenia consistent with an autistic spectrum illness? Schizophr Res 2004;69:119–20.
Please cite this article in press as: Mac´kowiak M, et al. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rep (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2014.04.011
549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616