New steroidal nitrosoureas

New steroidal nitrosoureas

129 2846 NEW Claude STEROIDAL Chantal Chavis+, Jean-Louis ++ Borgna NITROSOUREAS and de Gourcy+, Jean-Louis + Imbach . + Laboratoire...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 79 Views

129

2846

NEW Claude

STEROIDAL

Chantal

Chavis+,

Jean-Louis

++

Borgna

NITROSOUREAS

and

de

Gourcy+,

Jean-Louis

+

Imbach

.

+

Laboratoire de Chimie Bio-Organique and Equipe de Recherche Associee no195 du CNRS, Universitg des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Place E.Bataillon, 34090, Mvgtpellier, France. Unite d'Endocrinologie Cellulaire et Moleculaire, INSERM 34100 Montpellier, France. (U I4S), 60 rue de Navacelles, Received T-27-81 ABSTRACT 174 and 20 nitrosourea derivatives belonging to the dehydroepiandrosterone, estrone and pregnenolone series have been synthesized. The behavior of these compounds towards the calf uterine estradiol and pregnenolone receptors have been studied. INTRODUCTION During lating such

the

past

agents new

have

combination

between

(an

can

pointed

takes

can the

out

that

the

receptor

ted

function

steroid

xyl

group.

two

types

the

Thus, of

aim

steroidal

remain of

representative

function 20

3-OH

in position

(pregnenolone)

Volume

39,

Number

S

an

steroids.

The

target

drugs

and

a the

tissue

studies

on

have

to bind

a carbonyl has

with

(10,Il)

C-3 or

been

belonging

(ni-

association

Previous

such

fruitful moiety

an unblocked

work

estrone

178

could

2

this

as

nitrosoureas

transdehydroepiandrosterone, as

of

hor-

a lipophilic

nitrosocarbamates

least

for

against

estrogen)

such

alky-

search

a specific

receptor.

at

to

and or

By

effectivness

has

The

drugs

alkylating

androgen

to

steroidal

a possible

(7,8,9))

receptor.

and

of

cytotoxic

delivered

requires

which

(l-6).

advantage

active

be

of

anticancer

nitrosoureas

nitrosoureas

specific

synthesized

towards

agent

a number

potential

hormonally

deactivate

steroidal

years

a latent

or

selectivity

alkylating or

as

tumors

mustards

carrier high

been

compounds

mone-dependent

trogen

thirty

to

an

hydro-

synthesize

to each

pregnenolone

introduction

their

oxygena-

of

of

series the

(dehydroepiandrosterone,estrone) be

effected

T~ROXD=

from

the

the

urea or

corresponding

February,

1982

amino

or

tainable hoped

steroids

a-aminocyano from

the corresponding

part ot the molecule

might

be readily

functionality.

in an unusual

way

alcohol tives

prepared

and

compounds

:

Rl=R2=H

b

R+ =Thp;

c

R,z

prepared

which

R2xCN ; R2=CN

was

of the

17 amino

deriva-

data whereas

to a mixture

leads

are easily

re-

of (ZOR)

separated.

17 and 20 aminonitriles

lb, 2b, 3b, Ic -synthesis (16). This

amino-acid

in ammoniacal

cyanide, never

ting keto material

la, 2a, 3a, 4a were obtained oximino steroids with Na/

the literature

group

by a Strecker out

3N”2 R2

The stereochemistry

to be B from

carried

of potassium

H

steroids

of the 20 oximino

(20s) isomers

reaction,

a

of the corresponding

(12-15).

I

RR2 *R2

On the other hand, were

or

AND DISCUSSION

the following

17 and 20 amino

is known

duction

the

of the alkylating

CH

by reduction

It was

~1 to the nitrosourea

properties

RR2 R2

The

ob-

moiety.

RESULTS Ne have

group

influence

and pharmacological

carbamoytating

should

ketone

that the use of a cyano

chemical

which

appeared

always

methanol complete

detected

by

in the presence as some

t.1.c.

star-

of the reac-

S

131

TBICOSOI

NO 1

NH2

NH, C_N,CH2CH2Ci 6

y3

p H-~_N-CH2CH2Ct II

3a

tion mixture. well

However,

as a-cyanohydrins

carbonyl

compound

separation

been

that their

successful

_3b and _Ic were

2,

bamoylating

that a-aminonitriles equilibratewith

in such a way

has never

pounds 2,

it is known can readily

group

using

reacts

in a specific

to give excellent Thus compounds

car-

yields

in

p-nitrophenyl-N-

(18). This easily way on amino

prepared

functional

of the corresponding

groups

nitrosoureas.

9,

duced

compounds

yields

(Scheme

over

com-

nitrosocarbamoylated

the new reagent

Z-chloroethyl-N-nitrosocarbamate

2, -3a and -4a and the above reagent pro1, 6, 1, and 8 in very good to quantitative

1). These

previous

cultly-prepared

results

reports

on reaction

viz. &,

; therefore,

(17)

used as such for the next

may be directly

a one step procedure

ment

chromatographic

step.

The amino

reagent

as

the parent

with

where

are a significant

improve-

the same starting

material

N-nitrosocarbamoylazide,

and hazardous

reagent,

yielded

a diffi-

only 43% of 2.

However

-Ic does not react with p- nitrophenyl-N-2-chloroethyl-N-nitrosocarbamate probably owing to the weakened reactivity tain

of the amino

the desired

a-cyanonitrosourea namely

dure was employed, sation ning

group c1 to the nitrile.

of the urea.

a free

reaction

3-hydroxyl

(more than

3 days)

and incomplete

amounts

were

isocyanate

was used,

used,

group

nitrile

formation

pyrany;

was

titatively

chosen

takes

contai-

place

approximately a threefold from which

was

only

nitrosourea

deemed

in basic

The Strecker

stoiexcess

of

the

could be isolated.

be acid-labile

for this purpose

introduced.

by nitro-

the compound

of the steroid

sequence

should

18

an easier

at the 3-OH position

of the reaction

a protecting

resulted

compound

the aim of effecting

when

and when

a mixture

3R,l?B-diearbamoylated

gining

proce-

i.e. -Ic, showed that the isocyanate in DMF was very slow

chiometric

protection

two-step

followed

trials with

to ob-

function,

of N-2-chloroethyl

With

the usual

carbamoylation

Initial

In order

from

synthesis the be-

preferable.

since media

and tetrahydro-

as it is quickly procedure,

Such

the cc-amino-

when

and quanapplied

#!B WSlEOXDI

n t i v)

133

to the 3-0-tetrahydropyranylated aminonitriles next

lb, 3,

carbamoylation

and 46% yields

steroids

gave

the crude o-

-3b which were used directly for the step to produce 2, -10 and -II in 45, 40

respectively

purification.

Nitrosation

of the latter

three ureas,

after

column

by nitrosyl

chromatographic

chloride

in pyridine

ve yield

afforded

-12 and -14 in quantitatiRemoval of tetrahydropyranyl

was

Amberlite

and -13 in 72% yield. easily accomplished using

a dichloromethane-methanol titatively

STEREOCHEMISTRY

thought

to be c1 since

proceed

via an enamino

attacked

and gave -15 and -17 quan(Scheme 2).

OI' THE CYAN0 for the cyano

the Strecker

skeleton.

18-CH3'HNMR

chemical

from

group

which

at C-17

deduced

was partly

is

is known

(19) to

in turn will be

the less hindered

This hypothesis shifts

COMPOUNDS

reaction

intermediate

by CN- presumably

the steroid

in

mixture

and -16 in 85% yield

The stereochemistry

IR 120 (H+form)

~1 side of

confirmed

from

from Zurcher's

increments: Compound

0.73 0.77

5-Androsten-38-01 5-Androsten-3@,17B-diol 3H-(tetrahydropyran-2'yloxy)-17g-hydroxy-5androsten-17a-carbonitrile

3H-(tetrahydropyran-2'yloxy)-178-amino-5-androsten-17a-carbonitrile -lb The substituent

effect

Al7ol-CN= 0.93 Using

of the

of the

- 0.77=

the aminonitrile

is no deviation fect

reference

18-CH3 (dppm)

Al7B-NH22

If this Al7B-NH2

- 0.73

this work

is :

+ 0.16 ppm.

from the additivity

0.83

0.83

f7o-CN group

derivative

17fi-amino group

0.93

(20) (20) experimental value obtained by synthesis following (21)

should

be

- 0.16=

substituent

-lb and assuming there rule the substituent ef: - 0.06 ppm.

effect

is correct

chemical shift of 17fJ-amino+-androsten-36-01 CH3 equal to 0.73 - 0.06= 0.67 ppm. which is exactly

the

18-

should what was

be

S found

for

mental cyano

(see

(+ 0.13

value

deduced

found

these

experimental

literature group

sults

of

-la

in

study

offer

stereochemistry

series

only

one

for

is more

isomer

compound

when

at C20

conversion

shows

that

a downfield with

an

group

in

section) and (20o

results. (obtained 11, a

shift

upfield the

0.96

(ZOR)

reaction

20s) On

only

of

of

and

and the

from ppm.

2

mechanism

in

this

(208 the

reaction represent which

leading

to

pairs, or

ZOR)

18-CH3

in

of

the

preg-

there

is

the

18-CH3 for

is

compared

the

same

methyl

(experimental the

(ZOR)

derivatives

-8 fit

chemical

an upfield

there

concerning

is

to

data

(2OS)-NH2

viz,

product)

is

Literature

and

crude

stereochemical

shifts

study

value

steroids.

since

for

chemical

re-

that

is available

ppm.

the

suggest

for

of

ppm.

- 0.05

The

hand

stereochemistry

tool

17a

differentiation

spectra

isomer

nitrosourea

crude

NMR

to amide.

- 0.06

or -4a

other

These

one

0.02

found

and for

ZO-aminonitrile

the

a

theoretical

disubstituted

a conversion

0.05

were

(22)

experi-

of

available,

to ascertain

amine

(ZOR)-isomer.

which

the

no

effect

the

method

diagnostic

such

shift

was

whith

C,7

(from

of

for

(209)-amino or

of

Although

substituent

Apsimon

such

present

effect (23)

by

difficult

assignment the

the

agree

A possible

-3b).

section).

a convenient

stereochemistry

nane

135

experiments

calculated

effects

The

for

from

this

ppm.)

TBItOIDI

1.03 shift

can

be

understood

the

a-aminonitrile

-3a

the

above

shift

for

ppm.

and

and

argue

from from

-3b for for

the preg-

nenolone. EXPERIMENTAL Material

and

SECTION

methods

: Melting points are obtained in capillaries Chemical on a Buchi 510 melting range apparatus and are uncorrected. LJV spectra (imax in nm) were obtained on an Optica Model 10 spectrophotometer. Proton magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on Varian 90 or HA-100 instruments in CDCl all values are recorded in ppm. (6) with respect to TMS ai internal reference; band shape is indicated by s(singlet) ,d(doublet), t(triplet), m(multiplet). Thin layer chromatography was performed using Merck Kieselgel 60F 254 as 0.2 mm layers on aluminium foil. Merck silica (0.063 - 0.2 mm) was used for co-

lumn chromatography (solvent ratios are expressed as v/v). Optical rotations were taken on a Roussel-Jouan instrument with concentrations expressed in gram/100 ml of solution. IR spectra (v in cm-l) were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 450 instrumen??xMass spectra were obtained with a Jeol J.M.S. DlOO instrument. Elemental analysis were performed by the Service Central d'Analyse du C.N.R.S. Biochemical

:

Non radioactive R was kindly provided by Roussel-Uclaf 5P2?. (France). Stock so u ions (5 to 50 mM) of unlabelled compounds were made in ethanol or dimethylformamide and they were then diluted with ethanol ; to avoid degradation of the compounds, these solutions were kept at O'C and used during the following 24 h. Preparation of soluble extracts : uteri (stored at80°C) from immature calf and lamb were washed then homogenized in TE buffer (Tris-HCI IO mM pH : 7.4, EDTA 1.5 mM) The homogenates were centrifuged at with an ultraturrax. 105,000 g for 60 min. The supernatants defined as cytosols were adjusted to 2 mg protein/ml and used for binding studies. Determination of relative binding affinity for R (estrogen receptor) and R (progesterone receptor) : Eytoincubated for 4Por 24 h at 0-2°C with 3.5 to 7.5 and increasing concentrations of the teste

TE buffer) at 0°C. Tritiated steroid remaining in 2Q0 i.liof DCC treated cytosols were counted in 3 ml ethanol and 10 ml : 0.3 X) and POPOP of a toluene, PPO (2,5-diphenyloxazole -benzene : 0.01 X) mixture (1,4-bis Z-(5-phenyloxazolyl) using a SL30 intertechnique scintillation counter with a 20-25 % efficiency. Chemical synthesis : The N-2-chloroethyl-N-nitrosocarbamoylp-nitrophenylester was synthesized according to the were preliterature method (18). 178-or 20-aminosteroids pared following the known literature procedure by sodiumalcohol reduction of oximes. The separation of ,the (20 R)and (20 S)-amino-pregnane derivatives was done by chromatography on a silicagel column impregnated with ammonia. 17@-Amino-5-androsten-3H--01 (la) : mP 158-1590c (from ethyl acetate), lit. (12) : 160 V C ; TH NMR- (~~~l~~~,~H~;67 3H, 18-H), 1.03 (s, 3H, 19-H), 2.65 (t, (s,

S J = 8Hz),

3.47

137

'PBEOXDI

(m, IH, 3a-H),

5.33

(m, lH, 6-H).

(Za) : mp 17fi-Amino-l, 3, 5(10)-estratrien-3-01 222-224°C (from methanol) lit (13) : 222-226°C ; ‘H NMR (CDCI ) : 0.67 (s, 3H, 18-H), 2.60 (t, IH, 17a-H, J = 8Hz), 6.50 &H, 4-H), 6.56 (IH, 2-H), 7.07 (d, IH, l-H, J = 9nz). (2OS)-Amino-5-pregnen-3B-o1 (3a) : mp 172-174°C (from methanol), lit. (14) : 172-174°C ; IH NMR (CDC13) : 0.65 (s, 3H, 18-H), 0.98 (s, 3H, 19-H), 1.09 (d, 3H, 21-H), J= 6Hz), 2.77 (m, IH, 17a-H), 3.49 (m, lH, 3a-H), 5.33 (m, lH, 6-H). (2OR)-Amino-5-pregnen-3B-ol (4a) : mp 215-217'C (from methanol) lit. (15): 218-219°C ; 1H NMR (CDCI ) : 0.76 (s, 3H, 18-H), 1.00 (d, 3H, 21-H, J = 6Hz), ,.a3 (s, 3H, 19-H), 2.78 (m, IH, 17a-H), 3.51 (m, IN, 3a-H), 5.33 (m, lH, 6-H). Synthesis of 17@-and 20-N-aitrosoureas : In a typical exneriment N-2-chloroethyl-N-nltrosocarbamoyl-D-nitro-phenylester (0.828 mmole) was added to a solution of aminosteroid (0.715 mmole) in pyridine (5ml) at - IO'C. After vigorsus stirring was maintained for 3 h, the reaction mixture evaporated under vacuum then coevaporated three times with toluene. The oily residue was dissolved in ethanol (5ml) and allowed to crystaliize and then recrystallized.

17@-(N-2Tchloroethyl-N '-nitrosoureyl)-5-androsten-3R01. (5 ) : Following the above general procedure, the readtlon of la (0,2lg, 0.715 mmole) with the reagent (O,226g, 0.828 mmae) gave 5 after crystallization from ethanol

Mass spectrum : m/e/I, 316/27 (M-CICH2CH2N = NOH)?, 299/31 M-(H20 + ClCH2CH -N-NO+) 298/100 (M-Cl-Cfi -CH -N = NOH)t-H 0, 283184 (2$8-CH3)t Axial. talc. for 6 H gTp$4N~O$;7; C,g2.32 ; H,S.O8; N,9.91 ; found C,62.11 ; , ; ,a * 17@-(N-2-chloroethyl-N' -qit*osoureyl)-1,3,5 (lO)-estratrien-3-01 (6) : obtained from 2a in 92 % yield 88-9ooc (MeOH) ; Rf : 0.45 (CHC~~/E~~H, 9.5/0.5) + 12 (C 0.5, CHCl ) ; IR (CHCI ), 3590, 3420 294:&k! 1740 (C=O), 1610 &,, 1485 (N-30), 1340, ,296, 1160, lO;JO, 970, 900 ; UV (EtOH, 95) 220 nm (16,300), 277 nm (5,000), ,H NMR (CDC13) : 0.76 (6, 3H, IS-Y), 3.47 (t, 2H, CH -N-NO, J = 6,5 Hz), 3.96 (III,IH, 17a-H), 4.16 (t, 2H, CH2 -cb,

138

5.65

(m, OH), 6.53-7.10 (m, 3H, I-H, 2-H, 4-H). Anal. H28N303Cl ; C,62.13 ; H,6.95 ; N,10.35 ; found ; H,6.84 ; N,10.20.

talc.

20S-(N-2-chloroethyl-N '-nitrosoureyl)-5-pregnen-38-01 : The same above procedure gave compound 7 ( (7) mp 104-106*C(Et 0) ; Rf : 0.37 (CHCI /EtOH, 9,5/0.5) - 103 (C 0.5 CH& >. IR (CHC13), 3603, 3420, 1720, 1485, 1380,31350, 1160, 1090, 960, 900 (CDCI ) : 0.78 (s, 3H, 18-H), 1.03 (s, 3H, 19-H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.5~2), 3H, 21-H, J = 6Hz), 3.50 (t, 2~, CH~-N-NO, 4.18 (t, 2H, CH2-Cl), 3.40-4.20 (2m, 3a-H and l7o-H), 5.33 (m, 1H, 6-H), 6.77 (d, IH, NH, J = 9Hz), 6.90 (d, IH, J = : m/e/I, 345117 (M-C1CH2NNO), 344164 9Hz). Mass spectrum (M-CICH CH -N=NOH)+ = A? ; 329/25 (A-CH3)? ; 326/100 (M0 = B? ; 311/70 (B - CH )t Anal. talc. CICH -CA -~=NOH)+-H for z H2 NOCI; 6 ,63.76 ; H,8.47 ; N,9.23 ; found C,63.65 ,8.4024, 4:9?5& 20R-(N-2-chloroethyl-N '-nitrosoureyl)-5-pregnen-38-01 (8) in 93 % vield and crvstallized from methanol . , : Obtained * Fl40-142iC (cyclohexane) ; Rf : 0.37 (CH C1 /EtOH, 9.51 ";;;o;[;~~o-;;=~; 0;;&5C~;1a)0. IR (CHC13),23660, 3420, 2940 +amlde II), 1380, 1350, 1160, 1.00 1090, 960, 900 ; 'H NMR (CDCI ) : 0.77 (s, 3H, 18-H), 1.23 (d, 3H, 21-H, J = 6Hz), 3.52 (t, 2H, (s, 3H, 19-H), J = 6.5Hz), 4.20 (t, 2H, CH2C1), 3.30-4.30 (2m, CH2-N-NO, 3a-H and 17a-H), 5.35 (m, IH, 6-H), 6.73 (d, 1H, NH, J = 345/10 (M-C~CH cH -NNO)+, : m/e/I, + 9Hz). Mass spectrum 344/50+(M-CICH CH N = NOH)+, 326/100 (M-C1;H$&~H;. - H 0), 311/882(3$6-CH >+ Anal. talc. for C ; found C,63.99 ; , .4 ; N,9.44. C,6 5 .76 ; H,8.47 ; N,9?29 2

3B-(N-2-chloroethyl-carbamoyl)-l7~-(N-2-chloroethyl-N' -urevl)-5-androsten-17o-carbonitrile (18) : Potassium cyanichloride (log, 0.19 mole) de (log, _- 0.154 mole) and ammonium of 38-hydroxy-5-androsten-l7-one were added to a suspension in methanol (150 ml) saturated with ammo(1Og, 3.47 mmole) nia. The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature whenadditional KCN (5g) and NH4Cl (5g) were added to the mixture which was then stirred an additional 4 days. The into cold water (11) containing reaction mixture was poured was washed with water acetic acid (20 ml) ; the precipitate and dried under vacuum over P 0 . To a solution of the abo(200 ml) ve solid material in anhydrous 2 aimethylformamide N-2-chloroethylisocyanate (II ml, at O'C was added dropwise After three days at room temperature the solu0.128 mole). tion was concentrated to half its initial volume and poured The precipitate was filtered, washed with into ice water. layer (500 ml) ; the organic water and dissolved in CHCI dried (d a2S0 ) and concentrated under was then separated, vacuum to give a oily residue (l$g) which was preabsorbed on silica and deposited on a silicagel column (6OOg, petro-

S

139

TDEOXDI

with a mixture of petroleum leum ether/ether l/l). Elution ether/ether 0.519.5 gave a solid product which was recrys; Rf : tallized from methanol (5.lg 28 X) ; mp 148-15O'C -55.8 (Cl, MeOH). IR(CHC13), 0.41 (Et O/MeOH, 0.8/0.2) i [p 3450, 32$0, 2950-2840, 2240 (Cl), 1700 (C=O), 1500-1550 (amide II), 1250-1200, 1140, 1080, 960. ]H NMR (CDCI ) : 0.77 (s, 3H, 18-H), 0.98 (s, 3H, 19-H), 3.30 and 3.53 (m, 4H, CH -CR Cl), 4.33 (m, 3a-H), 5.33 (m, IH, 6-H), 6.20 (t, IHf NH! J = 4.5 Hz), 6.65 (s, lH, NH), 7.25 (t, lH, NH,

; found

C,59.35;

: prepared according to Tetrahydropyranyl derivatives the literature procedure (24) in 95 % yield using p-toluene-sulfonic acid and dihydropyran in CH2C12. 3R-(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-5-androsten-l7-one 192-193°C (acetone), lit (25) 192-194'C.

one

: mp

3-(tetrahydropyran-2 '-yloxy)-1,3,5(10)-estratrien-17mp:147-149'C (ethylacetate), lit (26) 147-148°C.

3g-(tetrahydropyran-2 129-130°C (isopropylether),

'-yloxy)-5-pregnen-20-one lit (26) 129-13l'C.

: mp

3B-(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-l7~-(N-2-chloroethyl-N1ureyl)-5-androsten-17a-carbonitrile (9) : in a Typical experiment potassium cyanide (15.3 mmole, 0.995g), ammonium chloride (9.41 mmole, 0.498g) and saturated methanolic ammonia (10 ml) were added at O'C to a methanolic solution of 38-(tetrahydropyran-2 '-yloxy)-5-androsten-l7-one (1.27g, 3.41 mmole). The slurry was stirred at room temperature for then KCN (0.5g) and NH4C1 (0.252g) were added and 2 days, the mixture stirred for another 3 days. The KC1 was filtered off, washed with dry methanol and the filtrate concentrated under vacuum and dissolved in CHCl (50 ml) .I$-2-chloroethylisocyanate (0.307g, 3.5 mmole) was a a ded to the solution which was kept at room temperature for 17h. Then after removal of the solvent under vacuum, the oily residue was chromatographed (CH2~2/EtOH, 9.9/O.]) yn a silicagel column (60H) under low pressure (2.51b/in ) to give 9 (0.77g, 45% yield); 171-173'C (MeOH) ; Rf : 0.33 (CH Cl-/.EtOH, IR (CHCl ), 3386 $940, 2240 9.9/0.1) ; b]"SO -80 (Cl, CHC13). : 0.85 1500, 1135, 1025. 1H N& (CDCl;) (CN), 1690 (CgO), 1.00 (s, 3H, 19-H), 3.56 (m, 6H, ClCH-CH N-, (s, 3H, 18-H), 4.68 (m, IH, Thp), 5.33 (m, IH, 6-H), 0.60 ?m, Thp, 3a-H), : m/e/I, 383141 (M-RNHCONH)., 270/100 (M-RNCO-HCNAnal. talc. for C H N 0 Cl ; C, ;0,9.50 ; C1,7.0$8;4$02nJ C,66.50 ; H,8.33 ; N,8.34 ; 0,9.80 ; C1,7.10.

3-(tetrahydropyran-2 '-yloxy)-s73-(N-2-chIoxoethyl-N'ureylj-1,3,5(JO)-estratrien-J7a-carbonitrile (IO) : The above procedure was applied to 3-(tetrahydropyran-2'9yIoxy)r 1,3,5(10)-estratrien-17-one and JO -2as obtained as an oil

6.80 (dxd, 2-H), 7.45 (d, I-H, J=9Hz). Mass spectrum 364146 (M-RNHC0NH ) *,3/7/38 (N-RHco:~H~-HCN), 251/ 100 CH Cl? NCO-HCN--OH)'. Anal. ; N,8.64 ; found 66772'; H,7.46

: m/e/I (ccl-

3$-(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-20~-(~~-2-ch~o~oethy~-N~ureyl)-5-pregnen-20a-carbonitrile (!l) : Obtained from 3f3(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-S-pregnen-20-one in 4Oj: yield by

3B-(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-!7?-(~-2-chloroethyl-N_.'nitrosoureyl)-5-androsten-17a-carbonitrile (12) : Typically nltrosyl chloride was bubbled through a solution of 9 (ID~uo~&) maintained at O°C in anhydrous pyridine (15 nl) ; the reaction -.as complete within 15 mn. Cold ?ater (50 ml> was added until. precipitation occured ; the precipitate was filtared, washed with water and dissolved in dichloroaethane (150 ml.). The organic layer was separated,dried (Na2SOk), evaporated then coevaporated three times with toluene. ihe nitrosourea (12) was obtained as crystals (EtOH-Et20) in quEBtit2tiVe yield ; mp llg-120°C ; Rf : 0.55 (CHCX /EtOH, 9.810.2) ;[a]:" -47 (Cl, CHCl ). IR (CHCl > 29'-8, 2860, 2340 (CN), 3420 il35, 1020. H NXR fCDC13) 1740 (&==O), t290 (N-NO) 15;0-1456, 0.90 (s, 3H, 18-H), 1.06 (s, 38, 19-H), 3.50 (m, 2H, 3a-H,

found

C,62.99

3-(t~at~ahydr_o~yran-2'-~l~xy~-Ii~-(N-2-~h~~~~athy~~N1~ nittosourey~)-l,3,~(lO)-estratri~n-l7~-carhonit~~le (13) : compound 10 (2.3 mmole) gave I3 as 2211 0x1 1~ 72% weld after ; petroleum rapid colzn chromatog ether/ether 2930 ,

;

S

TICIICOID,I

141

uv (EtOH 95) 221 nm (11,250), 276 nm (2,200). IH NMR (CDCl ) 0.93 (8, 3H, 18-H), 3.50 (m, IH, Thp), 3.50 (t, 2H, CH -NNa ~=7Hs), 3.88 (m, IH, Thp), 4.16 (t, 2H, ClCH -, J=7Hz)'6.79 7.22 (s, (d, 4-H), 6.84 (dxd, Z-H), 7.16 (d, I-H, J=9&), Mass spectrum : m/e/I, 323/23 (M-C1CH2CH2N=NOHAnal talc. for C ; H;6*85 ; N,l0.88 ; found C,62.80 3~-(tetrahydropyran-2'-yloxy)-2O~-(N-2-chloroethyl-N1nitrosoureyl)-5-pregnen-2Oo-carbonitrile (14) : Compound

1135, 1025. (s, 3H, 21-H),

3.51

(m, 2H,,3a-H,

Thp),

3.90

-11

(m, IH,

. 17$-(N-2-chloroethyl-N' -nitrosoureyl)-3$-hydroxy-5androsten-17a-carbonitrile (15) : The tetrahydropyranylated derivative 12 (I mmole) was dissolved in a mixture+of di~hlorometha~-methanol (314) ; Amberlite IR 120 (H form) was added and after stirring 7h at room temperature, the resin was filtered and washed with dichloromethane. The filtrate was then stripped of solvent and the residue crystal-

1550-1540, 1090. H NMR (CDC13) : 0.90 (s, 3H, 3.52 (m, IH, 3a-H), 3.52 (t, 2H, CH2NNO, J=6.5Hz), 4.18 (t,2H, C1CH2-, J=6.5Hz), 5.36 (m, IH, 6-H), 7.15 (s,+lH, NH). Mass spectrum : m/efT, 341150 (Ma, 3231100 (M-cZCH,CH,N=NOH-OH).. Anal. talc. ; C,61.53 ; H,7,41 ; N,l2.48 ; found C,

17~-(N-2-chloroethyl-N '-nitrosoureyl)-3-hydroxy-1,3,5 (IO)-estratrien-17a-carbonitrile (16) : Obtained in 85% as an oil purrfled a florrsll column (2Og) eluted with petroleum ether/ether, 515 ; mp 135-137°C (ether) ; Rf : 0.40 (CH Cl /EtOH, 9.8/0.2) ;[aj2'+25.6 (Cl, CHCl >. IR (CHC13), 3606, 3420, 2930, 1740, 1618, 1490. UV GtOH 35) : 221 nm H NMR (CDCl ) : 0.93 (s, 3H (9,85(J), 277 nm (2,800) ; 18-H), 3.55 (t, 2H, CH2NN0, Jr7Hz), 4.20 (t, 2H, C1CH~I:=7Hz) 6.60 (d, 4-H), 6.65 (dxd, 2-H), 7.10 (d, I-H, J=9Hz), 7.65 (s, NH), 8.34 (s, OH). Mass spectrum : m/e/I, 323172 (M-ClCH CH2N=NOH) . Anal. talc. for C 6.51 ; N,l3,00 ; found C,61.28 ; ZOH-(N-2-chloroethyl-N '-nitrosoureyl)-3$-hydroxy-5pregnen-2Oa-carbonitrile (17) : Obtained In 95% after crys-

142

H NMR : 1.00 (s, ;IH, 1.93 (s, 3H, 21-H), (CDC13) 3.51 (m, IH, 3o-H), 3.51 (t, .J=7Hz), 4.16 (t, 2H, ClCH2-, J=7Hz), 5.33 (m, IH, 2H,CH2NN0, 6-H), 7.11 !s: IH, NH). Mass spectrum : rpW.3~;;;; ~~~CfCH~CH~N~N~~) 351/100 (M-ClCH CH2N=NOH-H20) ; H,7?553i 4 3 C,62.94 ; H,7.8$ ; N,ll.74 ; found C,62.88 N,11.55.

for

BIOLOGICAL

RESULTS

Compounds

-16

and

RE

compounds

while

efficient.

According

decreased bation ly

but

reached.

the

o-2Oc,

This

of

lateral

side

chain

results

were

(Fig.2)

all

bly of

do R

the

interact

cording

to

the

at

inhibition in Table

constant the

1.

ratio

affinity

KA= of

Only

with low

of

for

constant

kinetic

of

-6 incu-

with

uterus.

1

2 were

R

P The

not ineffi-

inhibition

constants after

that which

steroid

of 3 HR5020 proba-

binding

site

calculated 24 hrs

necessary

specific

the

-16 was

suggesting

the

the

affinity.

and the

by

at

Similar

For

a low

(27)

that,

site

competitors

rate,

occupancy

-6 occurs.

Again, time

KORENMAN

or[3H]R5020

the

binding

17,

concentrations

compounds

24 hrs

-6 (compound

affinity

affinity for 12LM-1 0.34 10 the

again

covalently

of [3H]E2

apparent

at

method

lamb

used.

apparent

0-2'C

the

derivatives

decreased

of -16 and

that

displayed

was

concentration

-8 were

suggesting

-16 and

with

tested

pregnane

relative

petition

high

obtained

to displace,

of

compounds

compound

binding

not

[I

alkylation of

also

while

P' The

no

compounds

efficient

after

-16 or 5 indicated site was reversible,

or

cient at 3 H R5020 [I was able

stabilized

3 H E2 II poorly

with

0-2“C, equilibrium was practical3 H E2 specific binding in the of

compounds

E 2 binding

tested)

at

increase

little

most

was

efficently

-17 or 5, 1 and the efficiency

time,

that,

DISCUSSION

-6 competed

-15 and to

markedly

suggesting

presence of

(Fig.1)

AND

binding

to

of

accom-

reach are

50%

listed

a relatively -16 and -6 displayed RE. On the basis of an affinity of E 2 for

constants

(neglecting

the

RE,

K+/Kpart

calculated (28),

of

the

from apparent

non-specifically

S

143

7FDEOSDI

;:-; \

2

Q a-v---V

A

l

0

l

0

X

0

X

500

50

5

Competitor

concentration

_ Figure.

Fig. I, : Relative binding of estradlol and compounds g,

1

5000

l

5oooo

( nH I

I_

affinity for the estrogen receptor -16 and -17. Calf uterine cytosol was incubated at 2; for 4 hrs (open symbols) H E2 and increasing conand 24 hrs (close symbols) with 3.5 nM : X ; 15 :AA; 16 :00; or 17 :VI centrations of unlabelled E 3H r binding was measul added in ethanol (final perzentage 72). red after 2 hrs charcoal adsorption at O'C. Ezch value, corrected for non specific binding, is expressed as a percentage of non(74000 cpm/ml of cytosol). inhibited 3H E2 specific binding

s

144

7.5

0

75 Competitor

Tacos=*

750

75000

7500

concentration

fnMl

.Figure.lI_

: Relative binding affinity for II of R5020 and compounds 5_, 2 and 7.

Fig. ceptor

the progesterone

re-

Calf uterine cytosol was incubated for 24 hrs with 7.5 nM 3H R5020 and increasing concentrations of unlabelled R :F added in ethanol (fina measured after 45 mn charcoal adsorption at binding is expressed as a percentage of non-inhibited bind?!g0(68000 cpm/ml of cytosol).

s bound

compound)

would

K*

(16)

= 0.58

109

LM-'

KA

(-2)

-

109

LM-1

and The be

apparent less

R5020 ted

affinity

than

for

RR

would

be

be

I .4

4 x

106

than

:

respectively

of the other -1 LM . Assuming

(29.), the less

145

T=EOSDI

apparent IO5 LM

-1

compounds a KA

affinity

tested

of

0.2

IO9 LM -'

of

the

ligands

tes-

I

Apparent relative binding for RE and RI, of calf

affinity uterus.

-RF

RE 100

3 T 8 13 16 17 -

of

.

TABLE

E2 ;5020

would

100 0.01

< 0.001

?I

0.4 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.17 < 0.001

0.06 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 N.D. < 0.01

For compounds 16 and 6, the apparent relative binding affinities were calculated-from concentration of unlabelled and competition necessary to reduce to 50 % specific binding after 24 hrsincuba~2J$$~~~dpH~~~o~o o the very inefficient competition of limit of their apparent re15, 17, 2: 7 and 8 only a upper lative affinity can be given. The high

estrone

affinity

absence large

of

derivatives

for

the

calf

and

178 hydroxyl

substituent

in

the

-16 and 5 lambuterine group

17o/$

and

evidence RE

kylation

concerning

in vitro of

any

RE

and

of

position.

could constitute a selective RE possessing an alkylating moiety ve

posses

a relatively

in

spite

the

presence

This

target

for

on

D-ring.

the

reaction

between

at

0-2'C.

However

RE may

occur.

Homologous

at

higher

of

of

suggests

such

the

that

derivatives We

such

do not

ha-

derivatives

temperature,

compounds

a

with

higher

al-

affinity group,

for RE (due to the presence

for instance)

could

In contrast,

homologous

and pregnane

series

constitute

derivatives

display

a very

of a 178 hydroxyl a more

specific

agent.

of -6 in the androstane low relative affinity

for RP, suggesting

that such derivatives

to act selectively

on RP.

would

not be useful

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the "Ligue Nationale Fran$aise contre le Cancerit for appreciated financial support to one of us. We are also indebted to Professor RO~HEFORT for making possible the biological studies and to Dr. WINTERNITZ for helpful discussions. REFERENCES I. Niculescu-Duvaz, I., Elian, I., Ionescu, M. and Tarnauceanu, E., J. Prakt. Chemie 321, 522 (1979). 2. Niculescu-Duvaz, I., CambanirA. and Tarnauceanu, E., 3. Med. Chem. lo, 172 (1967). 3. Schneider, F., Hamsher, J. and Beyler, R.E., Steroids, 8, 553 (1966). 4. Jones, J.B., Adam, D.J. and Leman, J.D., J. Med. Chem. 2, 827 (1971). 5. Wall, M.E., Abernethy, G.S., Carroll, F-1. and Taylor, D.J., 3. Med. Chem. 12, 810 (1969). 6. Hamacher, H., Arzn. Forsh, Drug. Res. 2, 463 (1979). G.J., J. Med. 7. Lam, H.Y., Begleiter, R.A. and Goldenberg, Chem. 22, 200 (1979). 8. Bouveng, R., Ellman, M., Gunnarsson, P.O., Jensen, G., Liljekvist, J., and MGntzing, J., Eur. J. Cancer Is, 407 (1979). B., Shepherd, R. and Stamwik, A., "Nitro9. Hartley-Asp, soureas in Cancer Treatment" ; INSERT Symposium NO 19 ; Ed. by B, Serrou ; Elsevier Biomedical Press ; 1981, 105. 10. Carroll, F.I., Philip, A., Blackwell, J.T., Taylor, D-3. and Wall, M.E., J. Med. Chem. IS, 1158 (1972). G. and Stamvik, 11. K?inyves, I., P., HEgberg, B., Ensen, and Treatment of Human Tumors", A * f in "Characterization W. Davies and K.R. Harrap Editors, 303 (1978). 12. Shoppee. C.W. and.Sly, J.C.P., J. Chem. Sot. 345 (1959). 13. Wheeler, O.H. and Reyes-Zamora, C., Can. J. Chem., 5, 160 (1969). 14. Lucas, R.A., Dickel, D.F., Dziemian, M.J., Ceglowski, M.J., Henze, B.L. and Mac Phillamy, H.B., J. Amer. Chem. sot. 82, 5688 (1960). 15. Van de Woude, G. and Van-Hove, L., Bull. Sot. Chim. Beige, 76, 566 (1967). 16. Zelinsky, N., Stadnikoff, G., Ber. s, I722 (1906).

S 17.

18. 19. 20.

21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.

ITDBLOIDI

147

Taillades, J. and Commeyras, A., Tetrahedron 30, 3407 (1974). Martinez, J., Oiry, .I., Imbach, J.L. and Winternitz, F., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 15, 211 (1980). A., Tetrahedron 30, 2493 Taillades, J. and Commeyras, (1974). Bhacca, N.S. and Williams, D.H. in "Applications of NMR Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry ; illustration from ; HOLDEN-DAY San Francisco, 1964. the steroid field" P., J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 75, Ercoli, A. and De Ruggieri, 650 (1953). Apsimon, J.W., Beierbeck, H. and Todd, D.K., Can. J. Chem. 50, 2351 (1972). Robinson, C.H. and Hofer, P., Chem. and Ind. 377 (1966). Crabbe, P., Garcia, G.A. and Rius, C., J. Chem. Sot. Perkin I, 810 (1973). Ott, A.C., Murray, M,F. and Pederson, R.L., J, Amer. Chem. Sot. 2, 1239 (1952). R.V. and Gisvold, O., .J. Amer. Pharmacol. Petersen, Assoc. 45, 5727 (1956). Korenman, S.G., Endocrinol. 87, 1119 (1970). J.L. and Rochefort, H., Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. Borgna, 20, 7t (1980). Garcia, M. and Rochefort, H., Endocrinol. 104, 1797 (1979).