CllEhllCAL
NON-EXPONENTLAL
AND HEXAFLUOROBENZENE
Desmond V O’CONNOR, Mmoru SUMITANI, John hl. MORRIS I~rsrm~c for ,Wdecrrlar Scrcrrcc. Alyodarp. Ohorohl 4-M. Japan
1 Introduction In recent
years the photophys~cs
and photocherms-
bcnzenes hdve been the sublect of
much research Interest. Smgle vibromc of monofluorobenzene benzenes
[I
[?I hnvc been cawed
out. Exponential
redistribution
in p-difluorobenzene
suggest that the decay kinetics,
[3,4]
YOSHIHARA
there are slgmficant
discrepancies hfetime
de-
would
at least III this mole-
m the published
data. Values rangmg
from 0.7 to I 6 ns have been reported for pentafluorobenzene excited at 270 M-I [8, I I, 121, wlude the of hehafluorobenzene
ported as 2 2 ns followmg
fronl all
tonal
and Keltaro
(smgle-exponential)
hfetnne
level studies
] and two of the dltluoro-
vlbronlc levels m these nlolecdes was reported, although recem observarrons of p~tlal -bra-
cay
1982
PKOSECOND FLUORESCENCE DECAY
IN ISOLATED PENTAFLUOROBENZENE
try of fluormated
10 Dccembcr
PHYSICS LETTERS
has been variously
265 run excitatron
re-
[S] and
as I 5 ns Followmg 270 run excltatlon [ 111. There IS therefore a need for more accurate decay tune meaof these molecules under colhston-free condltions. In this paper we report the results of such mensure-
eur~ments
cule, are more complex. As the number of fluorine substltuents
ments followmg
the absorption
tempt IS made to drstmgulsh between vlbrational cncrgy redlstrlbutlon and other mechamsms that could m-
Increases spectra become increasingly congested
!~euafluorobenzenc, the well-resolved vlbratlond structure of the benzene absorption untd. in penta- and
IS almost completely
vlbronic
lost. Excltatlon
to known
levels III these molecules IS therefore
sable but they have received some attention members or the series. Quantum
ternal conversion place. Radiative
as lsomerisatlon
Pcntafluorobenzene
[5,7]
although
III-
to the ground state may also take
and non-radlatlve
and hexafluorobenzenc
were
purlLed by trap-to-trap distillation on the vacuum line. Spectrograde n-pentane was fractionally dlstlllcd
with retention of the middle fraction. Decay ttmcs were measured following excltatlon with the Fourth harmomc of a mode-locked Nd .YAG laser. Streak unages of the fluorescence
decay rates for these
molecules have been calculated [S-IO] on the basis of fluorescence lifetime measurements. However, 350
2 Ekperirnental
yields of fluoresence
less than unity, even for excltatlon close to the The competmg process has been tenIdentified
duce non-erponenurdlty.
not posas the last
O-O transitlon. tatlvely
at 266 nm. Non-exponen-
single
and of triplet formatron have been measured [S-7] and 11has been found that the sum of+, and 4_ is much
excitation
rial decay was observed In both molecules and an at-
were obtained
with a silicon vldlcon (SIT) camera, dlgtised with a C-1000 Hamamatsu processor and processed in a NOVA 0 009-26
3 minicomputer.
14/S?/OOOO-0000/S
The streak camera was cali02.75 0 1982 North-Holland
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LWTTERS
Volonlc 93, ntnubcr 4
IO Dcccrr~bcr1982
brated by using a smgle laser puke and an etaion to produce a tram of pulses of accurately known temporal
separationfrom whxh an averagecahbratloncurve wascalculated Whenan e~per~i~ent~curve was obtained it was transferredimmcd~atelyfrom the streak camera to the minicomputer and corrected ~suxg one of these prevrously-stored caltbratron curves. Because the fluorescence from both compounds was weak single-shot decay curves were accumulated a number of times before andyws Low tenlper~(ures were achievedby ~~rcuia~~ng cold mtrogen gas round the sample cuvelre ln a quartz dewar. Absorptron spectra were recorded on a Gary 17 spectrophotometer and emlsslon spectra on a Shlmadzu RFSK! spectroffuorophotonreter.
3.
Resultsand discussion
The absorption spectra of penta- and hexafluoro. benzene measured at high resolutkon are dlustrated m fig. I. There is some evidence for vibrations structure in the penta~uorobenzene spectrum, the shoulders having 3 separation of X490 cm- I. This frequency could correspond to the totalIy symmetrx vs. nbra. tion (u = 474 cm- I) which ts active tn the emtsston specrrum of the pentzAluorobenzene molecular cation
IL
[ 13 J. In the hevafhtorobenzene spectrum, on the other hand. no wbrattond features are evident 11has been esttmatcd [ 14,l S] that the O-O transitrons he at 778 and 190 nm m penrafluorobenzene and he~3~uarobenzcne. respectrue&. ~onsequentiy the excess vrbrattonal energy m S, following evcltailon at %6 nm IS ~1600 CI~-~ rn C6HF5 and 3100 cm-t m CgF6. Moreover rt IS clear from tbc spectra shown m lig 1 that cxcttatron at 11~s wavelength populates both S1 and Sz m CeFG.The fluorescence spectra of both compounds COIISIS~of a broad str~~turelcss band extcndmg from 300 to 500 nm. These spectra were tndepctldent of sample ptcssure in the range I --Xl Torr With decreasmg c~~tat~on w3velengtlk the specfrurtl of IO Torr of CgHF5 rcrnamcd unaltered but tbar of C6F6 slufrcd shghtly to the red, as &mratcd rn fig. 3. Ths shft is c\pccted In a spectrunr donunsted by scquence tr~nsittons stnce excited state vtbrational frequencies are usually slightly smaller than ground st;rte ~requcneies.
In table i arc prcsentcd the results
0
220
230
zt0
2x
zeo
1
ofdecaytune
s
710
280
331
CHEMICAL PtlYSiCS LLTLRS
Volimc 9 3, ntrmbrr .I IIICJSU~CIIIL)IIISof four fluorinated
bcmencs under ISO-
latcd n~olcculc cond1ttons at 2Z°C Double cuponcn-
able dtfficultms particularly
m detecting ennssion at low pressures,
from hcxafluorobenzene.
Consequently
mrasurcd with a p~~oto~~~ul~~pirerand oscdloscope, end 1,I,4-Cr,t13FJ elrhtbttcd purely single exponential decay. The contrlbutton of the short-hvcd decay to tllc total mtenslty was grcatcr m C,F, than m
ll~e lifeme valuesglvcn for ths compound must be regarded as approximate. With the addri~on of 400 Torr of or-pentanc there ts a marked decrease in the mtcnsity of the short-lived component although the double exponential character of the decay pcrslsts. Smce 400 Torr corresponds, at a rough estimate, to a
CJlF$.
collision frequency or5 X IO9 s-l
~3s observed 111bo!h
C611F5 snd C&F& wl~cre.~stsolated p-C,C14Ft, the decay of WII~CII ws &I Jccsy
the effect of colhstonol relowrron on the doublcexpor\enttal decays we rcpc31cd the nwsurcments using dtfferent sample pressures end also using 400 Torr of a-pentanc as a buffer &IS. The results arc prescntcd in table 7, It LW be seen that at pressures bctwecn 200 mTorr and I Torr tbcre 1s In order
to mvestigate
little varirtion, wrthm experimentA
error, rn either
dcczy conskmt. In ~dditlon the co~ltr~bu~~on of exb component to the total intensity 1s also unchrrnyng
in tins pressure regton, so that we arc confident that collwon-rrec conditions perlnin in both CotllpoUtldS at thcsc prcssurcs As the prcssurc mcrcascs the gcncrdl trend, somewhat obscured by e.spcrmxntsl
fluctuattons, IS that
the vdluc of thcshorter lrfetut~e rer~~~tnsconst~nt, that of the longer 11fct1nic mcrrdses whde the mtcnstty contrrbutwn of the short-lived con~pot~e~~t decreases. It sl~ould hcrc be noted that we cxpcrlcnccd constdcr. Tabtc :! i’rc>Wred~p~[Id~~C~ ut the d‘!rJ) _-_
--
Compound -
C~lll 5
_.
-
--
I’rk!awrc (lurr)
011 iI 33 05
I IU ‘II I b) c6l
6
0 ‘2 06
._
-.___
01:f6ftt
r, WI)
_-
I11 r 40 173 * 36 176 i I7 111~ IO 116: 7 164 f 7 I?2 + I8 87i 47r
7 iI
I64 t II
10
l!O* II
I I>)
9J+
51 r
-_ _ _-__-_--3) Rough cstimatr ofmtcmtly
a, Al
rl (PS)
-_-_.---
t
10
5 dfld c6i 6 -_ __A-_
B IS
450 i 71) 7332 375 92Jt 173 195+ 61 710r 60 t115* IO5 970 ?. 64 1736t 564 z 7611
‘71
--u5 05 0.5 06 06 04 02 08
92
05
I-18
06
8l‘t f 59 705 5 42 857 f. 93
05 05 02
amlnhutlon of shor~~bved component h, I Torr wth 400 Tort 01 epcntdne added.
It is not surprismg that total vtbraltonal relaxation IS not aclueved wthm
the ~LIICscale of !_ilefluorescence. Titcr~forc we conthat we have no& measured a lifetime cltaracteristtc of the zero-pomt vtbrattonal level since the value of lhe longer decay tnne IS pressure dependent. Among the mechamsms that might lead to complex decay kmetics m the isolated molecule are the followrng {a) T~vo~onlponent decay has been observed m m-
clude
fermedrate C;ISCmolecules such as pyrazme [ 16). [ 171 and substttuted glyoxltls [IS]. How-
pynmtdinc
ever. these molecules are cllaracterlscd sn~all S,
-T, energy
by a relatlvcly
gap,whereasthis separationIII
CbHFg and CgFb 1s of the same size as the sepamtion In benzene Itself and tn the other fluorinated benzenes.
which are known to exhtbtt the exponentr~ decay expccted from moiecules in the staltstrcal Imut. (b) Vibrational redtstrtbution has been invest&ated in ground-state C,HF, [ 191 snd C,F, [ZO] but not II\ the emted states of these molecules Tlus phenomenon IS currently of intense research interest [71,77] and is expected to give rise to non~~ponentiai elctted-state r&\&ton. It has been observed m #ZCHJ F2 [3,4 j nt excess energtes for wluclt the density of vtbrational states IS as low as 4O/cm-t [“I_ The density ofstales nl 1600 cm-l ewcss energy m C6HFj, calculnted using HadrhoTs formula f23] and the ground-state vibratronal fr~quencles [24], ISalso =40fcm-‘ . A slrnllar calculatron wtb the ground-state frequencies of C,F, [2.5,26] ytelds a densrty of states of a-5 X IO4 al an cwcss cncrgy of 3000 cm-t. It Is lhcrcfore posslblc that,al the e\cltatlon wavelength used in the present study, double cxponcntlal decay could result from ~bratlona1 energy rcdIstr~bulion_ (c) Selecttve excitation of a single vlbromc ICYCIis not possible tn these molecules and the decay of many vlbratlonal lcvcls smmultaneously m&t lead to nonevponcntlal decay curves 1771. (d) Excitation of CGFc at 266 nm populates both the St and theSz evcitedstate. In C6HF, on the other
Volu~nc 93. number 4
CIiEhlICAL
IO Dcrclllircr
l’HYSlCS LLTTLRS
19x1
Table 3 TcmpcrJturr dcpcndLncc or IIIC dcuy ol C6111 5 dnd C61 6 (prowrc m both UIII~ICS = I Torr) -. ----_____ ________ Compounll
TPC)
Tl tp9
c(,llf
12 0 -23 -35
112i IlOi 163 + IlOt
5
22
G.16
-3
______
TZ IP~P
at .a’
4951 61 5282 ?I 738 t 303 670 t 100
06 02 01 01
762’1.88
OS
6402 88 - --~----
05 --
IO 14 17 ‘0
16-12 21
79t
____
10
--
d, Ruupli CS~IIILIIL’ ol ~nlcn~~ly lnntnbution wnlponcnl Energy/cm-’
to mvestigation
I‘lg 3 Thcrmol equtltbrmm ths~r~bul~onover the vtbr.~t~on~l cncrgy ln lhc ground ~ldlr: 01 pcntJtluorobcnzcnc .II (J) 2°C Jnd (b) -3S’C.
kngth cut-off
In ncithcr
It Ilas been pointed
trum
the thermal
equlltbrlum
energy in the electronic
dlstrlbutron ground
that
not bc IS
where
N(E)
bratlonal
exp(-E/k-T)
dE is the number
energy
between
the density of vlbrattonal butlon
functions
at 27’C
for C,HF,
,
of molecules
with
a VI-
of molecules above
22
may have
the zero-pomt
state and hence followmg excitation reach a level capable of mtermedrate strong coupling
with levels m S,. Such a level IS predicted properties
spec-
rcso-
from S1 can bc discounted.
to possess
[29].
(e) In C,F,
The
dcpendencc
of :IIC dec.~ys, lllustratcd m table 3, would seem to support this conclusion. WAm
errors no change was observed in tile apart from a decreased
from
peraturc
the short-lived
was lowered
from
for C6F6
-3°C.
As indicated
energy
distributions
displaced,
27 to -35°C.
tlonal
Fewer
repon between
at 22 and -3S’C
and 266
con-
as the tcmdata
niay
but the same conclusion
In fig. 3 the thermal 11111 CWll~llOn
should not populate
mtcnslty
component,
be drawn for the lempcraturc
drstn-
level In the ground
S, as well as S, radiative
temperature
stales. The calculated
cm-’
fluorcsc~n~c
for short-wavelcnglh
were obtained
fraction
as high as 4000
decay curve
than 390 nm. hlorcovcr,
nor the CgFg
E and E + dE and p(E) IS
m fig 3 It can be seen tllat
a non-neghgble
longer
the C6HF5
at wdvelenglhs
an Identical
Is there any evidence
tribution
at two temperatures,
ore dlustrated
and -35OC,
an energy
dl:‘
the emission
to that at wavelengths
the cxpcrimcnral decay of CgHF5,
means of the formulas dE a p(E)
However
at any rate fluorcsccnce
neglected when the energy of electromc c.\cltation considered. This distnbution can be calculated by
M(E)
W,NC.
by the USC of
nance fluorescence. The mdlcatlons are that m C6HF5
of vIbratIonal
state should
of the
dlffcrcnt
of the Cg HFg cniission
filters.
wavelength.
rcsolutlon
WC lsolatcd
than 290 nm ylcldcd
hand such a compllcatlon would appear to be absent smce lhe Onset of S2 absorpllon lies at a much shorter [X3]
wavclengtli
Accordmgly
rcglons
longer
out however
through
flaorescencc.
01 Wr~4wd
27 and
cqudlbrlum drc s~gmficrntly
of C,HFs
at -35°C
to .my signnlficant cvtcnt
levels m St capable
of couphng
vtbrJ-
WIIII Isoencr-
getlc levels m S2. The most plsuslble
evplandtron
would
appear
for the non-cupo-
nentral
behavlour
to be emrsslon
several
levels m S, CXII having a dlffcrent
from
decay tune.
very fast internal conversion from S, to S, could produce d dlstnbution of vibrational levels different from that produced by partial wbr;ltxon;rl re-
II has been shown that such B superpos~tron of decays can be analysed I” termsof a double nther thnn n WI&
organisatlon
ehponenttal
of mltlally
anism
IS thought
decay
In ahphatlc
Emrsston
cnerges
excited
to be responsible ammes
from S, might
than Sl emkon
Sl levels. Such a mechfor non-exponential
[30]. be expected and therefore
ftlr.7tion
of the mdmdual
decay times are
wdely spaced 130). Levels at higher energies WIN probably have shorter decay tunes and be less heavdy pop-
to he at higher
ulated
at higher
be amenable
sultmg
m a lcngthemng
pressures
or lower
temperatures,
of the longer
decay
rc-
tune un-
Volunic 93. nunlbcr 4
CXIEXIICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
der thcsr condltlons. vlbrattonal
energy
under dlscusslon
ofvarwon pressure III S,
means
There
Tlus ml&t
mcreascd.
be the reason for the lack
IS lowered
the inwstlgauon
between tllesc mechanisms
In order to dls-
results and those of prcvlous two-component
Furthermore
varia-
IS throu&
wavelength.
arc large dlscrepancles between
single e\ponentlal
levels
cannot be ruled out. The obvious
uon of the c\citatlon
We detect
or the
In addltion.couphngbctwecn
of e
There
that
hfcrune
measurements. decay
was reported
whereas
prevrously.
our values for the longer
cay tunes are In general
the present
picosecond
decay
much shorter
of the two dethan the smgle
exponential v,tlues previously reported. Wr cannot ascrlbe the dtscrepancles to dlffennces in the sample prsssurcs Smce our two-component decay- -SW. Aserved over a wde pressure range. We have checked our evpermlental as regards
condltlons
unpunty
very carefully,
and cuvette
especially
fluorescence
and con-
tammation from scattered hght and are satisfied that the observed two-component decay is not an artifact. We must therefore conclude that rcsolutlon of the decays Into two picosecond components was beyond the
capability of the decay time instruments wth wluch the previous measurements were made. This conclusion IS also supported
by the lack of consistency
the previously-reported
data.
In addtlon,
among
the value of
< I 6 m one of these reports [S] would seem to mdlcate that the actual Irl~et~e was shor~r than the time
resolution of the measurmg equipment.
4. Conclusion
It would tlon spectra other
appear that their lughly congested distmgulsh
fluonnated
C6HFS
benLencs
and CbF6
m which
from
absorpthe
monoexponentlal
decay 11x been observed. However, on the basis of the present experm~cnts other effeclscannot definitely be ruled out. Coolmg
of the molecules
in a supersonicjet
or varlatlon of the cxclting wavelength are means by which these effects could be dlstmguished We hope to report puzosecond
354
the results
References
on the time scale
m i-l as the tcmpcrature
and S, in C,F,
mgwh
IS also t!le posslbllity
is redistributed
of measurements
laser In the near future.
with a tuned
1 I ] A S Abraoson. t-I C. Spcas .md S A RIW, J Chcm. Phys 56(1972)X91. 121 C$uttlnann and S A. R~cc. 1. Chcm. Phys 6 t (t974) 131 R.A. CovclcshIc, D A. Dolvz.n and C.S. Pormenkr,
J.
Chcm Phys 72 (1980) 5774 [ 4) S H C,~blu, W.D Lawrence and A E.W. KmShr, J. Phys Chum 86 (1982) 1244.
151 S L. Lcm, C I’. Scmclul dnd I. Ungcr. Can J. Chcm 49 (1971) 1567. 161 Kh Al-Am and D. Phdhps. 1. Phyr Chcm 74 (1970) 4046. 171 D Phdhps, J. Phys Chrm 46 (1967)4679. [Sl C L Loper and C E C. Lcc.Chcm. Phys Lctrcrs 13 (197,) I40 191 G hl. Brcucr and E KC. Lee. Chcm Phya Lctlcrs 1-I (197’)404.
1’01 R C Bra\\” and D. Phdhps. J. I’holoLhur,. 3 (1974) 1’1 R G Oro~n and D. Phdhps. J. Chcm. Sot. 1’xxf;ly
337.
Tram II 70 (1974) 630. R.G lJrown, D. Phdhps and G. Das CupId, J. Phys.Chcm. 78 (197-1) 2407 131 C Co~urr-Xl~gos, D. Couarr and S. Leach, hlol. Phys 37 (197-l) 793. I (1972) 97 ‘-11 D. Phdhpb J. Phorochcm 151 H Sponcr. J. Chcm. Phys 22 (1954) 134.
II]
161 A r rad. F. Labmnni. A TrJmcr 2nd C. Trlc. J Cltcm. Phys. 60 ( 1973) 44 19. 171 K;. Uchlda. I Yam~zdhr Jnd ti tJaba,Chcm. Phys. Lcttcrs38 (1976) 133 181 R van dcr Wcrl rnd J. Kommandcur, Chcm Phys. I6 (1976) I15 191 R.C Sharp, C. Yablonowcl~ dnd N Blocmbcrgcn. J. Chcm Phys. 76 ( 1981) 2 147 S. SPLISUFand E. Crunwld. Chcm Phys. Lcttcrs 73 (1980) 438 J D. UcDonAld Ann Rev Phys.Chcm 30 (19’19) 19.
C S. P.trmcntcr, J Phys Chem. 86 (1982) 1735. PC. Huhoff, Mot Phys 7 (1963) 101. S G. I‘ranhlss and DJ. Hnrrlson. Spccrroclnm. Acln 3lA (1975) 1839. R A R. Pearce, D. Steele and K. Radchffc. J. Mot. SOW. I5 (1973) 409. V-l. Eaton and D Steele. J hlol. Spcclry. 48 (1973) 446. R-P H. Rcllschruck. m: Radutlonlcrs lrrlnslllons, cd. S II. Lm (Acddcmlc Press, New York, 1980) p. I94
T. Dcmum. C J. Wcrkhovcn, J. Lengclaar, R.P.H. Rertschmck and J.D.W. mn Voorst,Chcm. Phys. Lellcrs 27 (1974) 206. 1291 A. NIIZIII. 1. Jorlncr .md PM. Rentzcp~s. Proc. Roy Sot. A327 (1972) 367. 1301 C-l. Cureron. K. Han. D V. O’Connor and D. Phdhps, Chcm. Phys. 63 (1981) 31.