Nurse Education Tcduy (1988) 8,284-288 0 Longman Group UK Ltd 1988
Nursing research - a demystifying process Justus A Akinsanya
Projects have been used in nursing education for many years as a means of encouraging learners to find out information about issues affecting their professional training. In general, such projects have been concerned with pathophysiological and psycho-social topics related to nursing. Students are encouraged to carry out varying levels of information gathering and to produce individual or group reports. Over a period of 14 years, attempts have been made to introduce nurses to the research process in schools of nursing and institutions of higher education. This paper summarises the use of this method with learners in second and third years of basic nurse training and those undertaking the Diploma in Nursing course. The approach involves learners in following through the research process in nursing to the publication and dissemination stages. It is argued that if nursing is to be a research-based profession, tutors in all settings must bring research to the centre of all learning activities in nursing.
so that
INTRODUCTION The philosopher, Rousseau, considered that the most effective way to learn science is by doing it. In Emile, Rousseau argues that he should not be taught science and notes: business
themselves.
to suggest
that it is rarely
what he ought
to
a legitimate affecting
paper
process should be approached
that
the
research
in the same spirit
284
for
mystification
in nursing
may well be
paid to it rather than
of obtaining information
and other
Principal
which
based
began
objective
health matters.
Nursing the
ration
and
comed
because
(and
about issues of an
Officer
(Edu-
introduction
to the
described in this paper. In General Nursing Council for
and Wales (GNC) introduced
assessment
considerable Justus A Akinsanya PhD BSc(Lond) SRN ONC BTA CERT RNT FWACN Reader in Nursing Studi,es, Dorset Institute of Higher Education, Wallisdown Road, Poole, Dorset BH12 588 Manuscript accepted 19 February 1988
means
research process 1973, the former England
in this
out
It was this belief and the encouragement cation)
It is argued
process
nursing
to find it. You should
(P 142)
to find of subjects
So much of the present
subjective)
enlightened
put it within his reach,
encouraged
due to the undue reverence
learn; it is for him to want to learn, to seek and you should skilfully awaken the desire and supply him with means for its satisfaction.’
are
on a wide range
of the research
sometimes
‘In the first place do not forget your
learners
information
of learners
Enrolment.
The
change
of its theory-practice
apprehension
the ward-
for State
Regist-
was wellink but
arose because
of the
issue of varying standards of assessments both within and between individual hospitals. In one particular hospital, a group of second year student nurses discussed the problem and wondered whether information on the views of staff
NURSE EDUCAI‘ION
and
students
might
help
to clarify
towards the new form of assessment. was encouraged
to develop a questionnaire,
it in the School of Nursing, views of a random
ingly low (22%),
attitudes The group pilot
and then canvass the
sample of staff and students in
began an attempt
in a School process
of Nursing
during
publication
setting
their
1973) encouraged group
year
block.
concerned
feasible
thus saw research
exercise
within
the
a number
was continued
students
widely reported
and were
as an Occas(Barlow J ,4 et
were
ward
patients’
lives. The group
resulting
precaution
of
This involved of Nursing
in the
about
tragic
guid-
survey
in hospitals
a
loss of
under
of fire
in the United
the development
The
of a research
in hospitals
Nursing
argued
As research
crucially
more
development the
time
block.
The
money
questionnaire
towards
nursing
concern
a number
its success.
one criterion
concerned a
work in an It was soon for
the
was available
also had
to be A
and piloted for the financed
to a randomly throughout the
rate was disappoint-
about
of
continues
to
which is recognised is the possession
to guide
practice.
nursing
Diploma in Nursing,
their
at a college
‘l‘he debate about
of writers in and on nursing.
In 1983,
planned
tried
is a profession
profession.
planned survey. The School of Nursing
the response
whether
on the methods.
the students contri-
the duplication and circulation selected sample of 200 hospitals
was next
whether
the cost of postage.
was developed
to
about
it, but were willing to
and higher education.
questioned
of staff. During
study
funded and for this purpose,
approach
further
However,
and encouraged
than
The
of knowledge
was needed
of the study
were enthusiastic
RESEARCH-BASED
in
the students
with the support
NURSING -A PROFESSION?
of
2 week block, the students began attempt to investigate the problem. that
was experi-
It was interesting
money to ensure
Officer
depended
was an acceptable
investigation
levels and the import-
and they not only gave up some of
that caring
use of sound fire precaution
activity in the School,
in
was thus seen
with others
note that the students
test of professionalism
to the Principal of the School group
encounter
process
and group
pro-
problems
at the
handicapped
decided,
and the Principal
the Hospital.
would normally
enced by staff and students.
contribute
the study
with all the major
of collaboration
the project
Kingdom. proposal submitted
of undertaking
to learn-
concerned
out an ambitious
methods
process
in 1975, a group of
fire in a mental
hospital
to carry
as a
normal
However,
UK. Although
published
their free time to support
of the publication,
Centre.
year
ance
school.
research
buted
Qualitative responses
ional Paper in the Nursing Times
that researchers
The
and staff in
Education
during
collated and the findings
at individual
ing about nursing
realised
the
of
to a nation-
approaches
safety
analyses
their work. The research
small scale classroom-based
effective
quantitative
(Elliott et al
findings
and contributed
and hospital
As a result
ance,
data.
vided the students
of the new form of assessment.
activities of a training
third
the resultant
The
learners
to the research
second
of students
the school perfectly
to introduce
of the students’
wide discussion The
were encouraged
to analyse
al 1975).
the hospital. Thus
the students
285
TODAY
as a
of a body
Smith
(1979)
is a research-based
students
undertaking
University
of London,
this issue.
They
the were
decided
to
investigate. As part of their learning, to the Steinberg
Collection
reference
tations in the Royal College Library.
The students
the librarian examine
was made
of theses and disserof Nursing
(RCN)
were given permission
to spend a day in the library
the range of completed
by and
studies depos-
ited in the collection. Firstly, there was a growing and strong body of research-based
knowledge
in nursing
to the generality
of practising
Sheehan
(1986)
suggests
research
findings
unknown
nurses in the LJK.
that the application
in nursing
of
is a formidable
challenge facing the profession. One solution would be to make such published research useful
286
NURSE EDUCATION
to the practising nation
nurse.
of research
knowledge practice
TODAY
Secondly,
findings
so accumulated
of nursing.
that such knowledge
was to influence must therefore
of
in
drawing
on research
teaching
(Akinsanya
It was clear students
findings
from
by no means The
encourage learners
their
from
the
much confidence about
and
the place and
(DHSS)
nor
(BMA)
line between training
of concern
to the profession
stood by students introduction Although
and practitioners. accelerated
assessment,
and evaluating accepted, openly
are the least under-
of the nursing
was suddenly
issues
The gradual
process in the
planning,
in the UK late
1970s.
considerable expressed
misgivings
about
Henderson
(1982)
was concerned
of the title and questioned
to be sure
to
contribute
to
the
nursing care. There the implementation haphazard
and
delivery
its use really of
was evidence
good
it is
quality
to suggest that
in the UK was somewhat
opportunistic
(De
La
Cuesta
the next attempt
teaching
nursing research
to use this method arose in relation
of
to the
nursing process. The group of students concerned were enrolled for the Diploma in Nursing, University of London. The problem was how the medical profession viewed the introduction of the nursing process. It was
as a
former
Research
Unit of the GNC had reported
on the
of a national
nurses
degrees.
The
survey
to locate
students
relevant literature
& MacGuire 1970). The reports contained with medical degrees
searched
and
(Jackson
197 1; 1973
the names
of nurses
and, based on this informa-
tion, the Medical Directory
was used to trace 16
such
group
nurse/doctors.
published
The
piloted
As
this
extended
approach
became
staff
as a part content
a
used it to
with medical
process. The results were 1985).
by
developed
it and finally
(Akinsanya
appreciated
and of
the
established
and
students,
it
was
syllabus
for
the
of the departmental
course.
Thus another important issue of perennial interest in nursing is that of continuing education (Duberley
1985;
Nugent
1984;
Owen 1985). The former Joint Nursing Studies provided range
of post-basic
transfer
1983). Thus
the
findings
research does
research
For
on the nursing
its appropriateness
that
lesson about
knowledge.
degrees
about the use
acknow-
that the students
being
describe what nurses do. Whether the title is right or not, however, important
and nursing,
officially
the views of the nurses
cation of rituals to which it gives rise in practice.
It
medicine
canvass
sanctifi-
Security
Association the dividing
became
were
the apparent
to
for
crossed
It was at this point
questionnaire,
implementing
as stages of the process
of difficulties
clear that neither
is not
an important
as
process.
of such nurse/doctors.
professional ledged.
the
qualified
Medical
that when nurses
initial
was
Rowden
and Social
British
kept a record
obtained that current
of Health the
their
with
It is often the case, however,
1984;
to investigate
It soon became
contribution
PROCESS - IS THE
decided
This study posed a number the students.
learnt
in nursing.
THE NURSING TITLE RIGHT?
(Mitchell
students
the Department
by
to support
feedback
settled
on the subject of the nursing
seemed
the
enthusiastic
role of research
in
process
and that the debate as to its appropriateness 1984).
1984).
that they gained
they became
must
had openly
of the nursing
view of nurses who had subsequently
such dissemi-
their
of doctors
the introduction
on the
that of tutors
who
nursing
that a number
doctors
for ensuring
research-mindedness
known criticised
ensure
or ignored.
was first and foremost
schools
the
profes-
was not left unused
The responsibility nation
if the
A research-based
sion, the students argued, shelves of libraries
that dissemi-
was essential
has
resulted
1983;
the impetus for a wide
courses
of these courses
Rogers
Board of Clinical
for nurses
to the National
in a structured
and
and the Boards
statutorily
validated courses in areas of education, research, management and clinical practice. Yet it was clear that opportunities for individual nurses to undertake such courses was not always taken either because of lack of information or the failure of senior staff to recognise
their import-
NURSE EDL’CA-rlON
ante. This problem was examined by a group of nurses undertaking the Council for National Academic Awards Diploma in Professional Studies in Nursing course at this Institute. The investigation enabled the students to develop and test a questionnaire and an interview schedule under guidance. These were used to obtain data on a national basis and the results were disseminated by representatives of the group of students at the Royal College of Nursing Research Society Annual Conference at the University of Reading (Bartlam et al 1986). This was a particularly encouraging development for the Research Society forum did not normally encourage the type of request that was made for the participation of the students - i.e. the presentation by a group of six students at a specific point in the Conference of the findings of their own small-scaled research into a problem of professional concern. The reception of the ideas, the exchange of views with renowned nursing researchers and the general tolerance of their ideas showed the maturity and confidence of the profession in its quest for research-based knowledge. The students were pleased to face a critical but understanding audience as a forum for the dissemination of the findings of their study.
DISCUSSION This approach to teaching nursing research has proved successful in schools of nursing and as part of the post registration education if nurses in further and higher education. The need for a research-oriented
teaching
in
nursing
is both
urgent and necessary. The current concern about the future of nursing education must be linked with the need for the development of a sound foundation for basic education. The pronouncements in project 2000 (UKCC 1986) depend
crucially
on
research
evidence
which
showed that fundamental changes must be made if the profession is to face the challenges of the Year 2000 and beyond with confidence. The UK(X and the National Boards are equally concerned about the need for a structured framework
for
the
development
of
a coherent
TODAY
287
research basis for nursing education. The English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting recently identified areas of research priorities of which innovation in education was a notable example (ENB 1987). Research activities must be brought to the centre of nursing education if its practice is to benefit from the resulting innovations. In the 14 years since the approach described in this paper has been used to teach nursing research, there is evidence to suggest that it improved learners’ understanding of the research process. Above all, by demystifying the process itself, it encouraged learners to see research as an integral part of their professional development. In a climate in which professional performance is subjected to set-ious scrutiny in order to obtain resources, nurses must be armed with meticulously researched evidence as important user of resources within the health services. Indeed, learners as future practitioners must be encouraged. guided and supported at the earliest stages of their education and training to see research as the cornerstone of a knowledgebased professional practice. This learning research by doing it approach continues to provide a challenging and stimulating experience for students. staff and their clinical colleagues. Its wider use in basic and post-basic nlursing education is to be encouraged.
kfeK?nCeS Akinsanya J A 3984 Learning about nursing research. Nursing Times, Occasional Papers. X0, 35: 59-61 Akinsanva.] A 1985 a slow process. Nursing ., rimes 81
43: 24-27
Barlow J A et al 1975 Fire precaution methods in hospitals in the United Kingdom. Nursing Times, Occasional Papers. January 16. 1-4 Bartlam S et al 1986 Unpublished Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the RCN Research Society, University of Reading, 11-13 April De La Ouesta C 1983 The nursing process: from development to implementation. Journal ofAdvanced Nursing 8.5: 365-371 Dub?rley J 1985 Continuing education - whose responsibility? The Professional Nurse. October. 4-t; Elliott J et al 1973 Ward-based practical examinations Nursing Times 69. 23: 744-745 English National Board for Nursing, Widwiferv & Health Visiting 1987 Circular to all institutions
288
NURSE EDUCATION
TODAY
approved by the Board and related research institutions. October, ENB, London Henderson V 1982 The nursing process: is the title right? Journal of Advanced Nursing 7.2: 103-109 Jackson I J 197 1 Registered nurses with degrees. Occasional papers, Nursing Times 75, 115-156 Iackson I I 1973 The graduate nurse expansion. Occasional papers, Nursing Times 77,. 13-15 MacCuire 1 1970 Nurses and araduates: an attemnt nurses v&h degrees. Occasi&al Papers, Nursing Times 74,45-48 Mitchell T 1984 The nursing process debate. Is nursing any business of doctors? Nursing Times 80, 19: 28-32 Nugent A 1984 The case for continuing education. Senior Nurse 1,26, September 26, 12-13 Owen R 1985 Professional Development - Is it your
business? Nursing Practice 1, 40-42 Rogers I 1983 The impact of post-basic clinical e&&ion. Nursing Times 13, July, 42-44 Rousseau 1 1 1911 Emile (Translated bv B Foxlesl Everymil;‘s Library, Dent, London ’ Rowden R 1984 Doctors can work with the nursing process. Nursing Times 80, 19: 32-34 Sheehan 1 1986 Nursing research in Britain: the state of the artyNurse Educazon Today 6, 1: 3-10 Smith J P 1979 Is the nursing profession really research-based? Journal of Advanced Nursing 4, 319-325 United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting 1986 Project 2000: a new preparation for practice. UKCC, London