INORG.
NUCL
(IH~l.
LETTERS
Vol. 10,
pp. 413-419, 1974.
Pergamon
Press.
Printed
in
Great
Britain.
0n the Cyclooctatetraenll Compounds of Actinide Elements Part II. Bis-(cyc~octatetraen~l) protactinium(IV) GOFFART J. ~, FUGER J., BROWN D. ~nd DUYCKAERTS Go Institute of Radiochemistry, University of Li6ge, S;rt Ti]mccl B - 4000 LIEGE (Belgium) (Received 31 January 1974)
ABSTRACT The preparation reported.
of o new organometa!lic
It has been characterized
powder diffraction
compound,
(CsHs)2Pa , is
by IR spectrometry
~nd by X-r~y
analysis.
INTRODUCTION Compounds
of actinide
iigand have been reported and plutonium (CsH8)2Pa.
(iV) I'2.
elements
with cyelooctatetraene,
for thorium
(IV), uranium
We have now succeeded
Only one other organometallic
(C8H8) , :z<;
(IV), neptuniun
in synthesizing
compound
(IV)
the compound
of protactinium,
(CsHs)4Pu , has previously 3 been characterized.
EXPERIMENTAL Reagents specie! refluxed
: All experiments glove-box.
were carried out under purified
Solvents
Protactinium and purified
tetrachloride
by sublimation
sium salt was made according drofuran
were purified by conventional
and distilled in the presence
argon in =~ methods~
of (CsHs)2U.
was prepared
in vacua.
as described
Cyclooctatetraenyl
to the literature
previously 4 dianion !)otas -
preparation 2 i:l tetr:~hy-
(THF) .
Preparative
: (C8118) 2 Pa was prepared
PaCI 4 + 2 C8H8K 2
* Charg@ de Recherches Nucl~aires ** Chemistry Division,
THF)
according
to the reaction
(CsHs)2Pa + 4 KCI
A l'Institut
Interuniversitaire
AERE, Harwell,
(I)
des Sciences
Great Britain
q P r e s e n t e d in Part by J . G O F F A R T at in A c t i n i d e C h e m i s t r y , Liege, M a y 413
the S y m p o s i u m 3-4, 1973.
on Recent
Aspects
414
CYCLOOCTATETRAENYL COMPOUNDS
Vol. 10, No. 5
After stirring the reaction mixture for 10 hr or more, the solvent was removed under vacuum.
The compound w~s recovered by extraction into
toluene or by direct sublim:~tion from the residue of the evaporation. After r e s u b l i m a t i o ~ 1 5 5 °C, 5 10 -3 T), a ye!lowish-coloured product was obtained;
the final yield, based on PaC14 after two sublimations did not
exceed 1 % . Physical studies
: The infrared spectrum (Nujo] mu!] between KBr discs)
was recorded on a Perkin Elmer Infracord Spectrophotometer. The X-ray diffraction powder p~tterns of the samples sealed in vacuo (I0-5T) in very thin capillaries were obtained with a Philips unit, mode] PW 1010, using chromium X-radiation.
The camera was a 57.54 mm
diameter Philips Debye-Sherrer type (PW 1025/10) that employed Straumanis film mounting and w~s equipped with a 0.21 mm diameter brass micro~ollimator.
Exposure times ranged between 4 and 8 hours, operating
at 24 kV - 16 mA and using Industrial G films.
In some instances, a
vanadium filter was used to remove the chromium K~I radiation.
A number
of exposures, typically 1 hour at 38 kV - 26 mA were also obtained using a copper X-radiation fine focus tube, which resulted in a poorer line resolution than with the chromium radiation. Line positions on the films were determined by means of a micrometric ruler (Siemens-Kirem type 940) allowing an ultimate precision of O.O1 mm; duplicate measurements were averaged.
Corrections for film
shrinkage were made.
Intensities were estimated visually.
For lattice
parameter refinement,
the LCR-2 programme, written by Williams 5 was
used and the Nelson-Riley extrapolation function was applied.
In this
programme, e~ch indexed line is weighed by a factor proportional to i/sin2(2 @ ) . ~ 2 ( @ )
wherea. (@) is the estimated random error in @4~(@)
was assigned a value of 0.05 ° .
When an observed line was considered
to arise from the superposition of several theoretically-possible reflexions,
each reflexion in the group was assigned a value of
(@i) given by the relation ~(8~)
=
o.o
lj = n j : 1
(2)
Ii in which I. is the calculated theoretical intensity for the ithref!exion. l
Vol. 10, No. 5
CYCLOOCTATETRAENYL COMPOUNDS
415
Thus, for the entire group of n possible reflexions ~(0) e,:ua] to 0.05 °.
The theoreticaJ
line intensities
remoi~c
(scaled to I 0
~ =
10.0) used in this process were taken, as ~ first upproxim:?tion, from a calculation made by Dr. J.L. Burns (Transuranium Research LeboratoK
ry, Oak Ridge National Laboratory) with the sJd of the POWD progr:mme ~ for the thorium compound using the positional and ~uisotropic therm;~ p~r~.meters listed by Avdeev et a]7; in these c~!eul~tions,
~n absorption
correction for cylindrical samples was mt~de by me~nc of a subroutine built in the programme, using a w~.lue of Lr = ~.0 wlqere ~ is the [iine~,r absorptior~ coefficient and r the radius of the cylinder.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Analysis of X-ray powder diffrsction results has identified the ~roduct of the reaction between P~Ci 4 and CsH8K 2 as (CsHs)2P~ , which i:~ isostructur~l with the previously oharacterised uctinide
(IV) bis-
cyc~ooctatetraenyls and whici~ exhibits an infrared spectrum virtu~ L!y identical with those of its nnalogues.
The yield of (C8Hs)2P:~ is
appreciably lower than those obtained for other act!hide octetetraenyls under the same experimental conditions. cor~sequence of the fact that protactinium
(If) bis-cyc~oThis may be o
(IV) is oxidised much more
readily than the tetravalent states of thorium, ur~nium, neptunium and plutonium.
(Cf. the instability of, for example, Pa(dtc)4, dtc = N,N, --
diethyldithiocarbamate, relative to its actinide
7
8
(IV) analogues )o
Attempts to obt;~in (C8H8)2Pa using benzene at ambient temperature -~ the solvent for reaction I have been unsuccessful. compounds of this type,
Like the othe~ ~
(C8H8)2Pa is extremely sensitive to air and has
a very low solubility in common organic solvent. Details of the infrared spectrum of (CsHs)2P~ are given in T~b!e I together with those for the thorium, uranium and neptunium an log~es for comparison.
It is seen that the infrcred spectra of the ~ctiride
(IV) cyclooctatetraene compounds are essentially identical with r~i~ tively few sbsorption bands as expected for compounds of higi~ symmetry 9 .
416
CYCLOOCTATETRAENYL COMPOUNDS
TABLE
Infrared spectra
Vol. 10, No. 5
1
(cm -I) of (C8H8)2Act*
~- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !
I(CsH8 )2 Th
(CsH8 )2 Pa
695 vs
695 vs
698 vs
690 s
Asymmetric ring metal ring tilting
742 s
745 s
746 s
740 m
775 s
775 m
777 m
~C-H bending (I) and C-H bending (1) or C-C-C bending (I)
790 w
795 m
792 m
848 w 895 s
895
s
(CgH8 )2 U
845
w
900
s
1318 m
1310 m
1320 m
1765 w
1750 w
1765 w
1865 w
1850 w
1870 w
1965 w
(C8H8 )2NP 1
890
s
Assignment 9
C-H bending
(//)
C-C stretching
1960 w
*
vs
:
very strong;
s : strong;
m : medium; w : weak
A partial list of observed and calcultad 2e values is shown in Table II; the observed values are the sverage of values obtained from two photographs the monoclinic
of the same prepsration and the i~Sexing is based on (P21/n)
nium compounds °.
structure of the corresponding
With chromium radiation,
diffraction
thorium ~nd uralines could be
read up to a 2~ value of about 135 ° but due to the complexity of the pattern only those lines below 85 ~ have been indexed. no extraneous line was detected. p~rameters
(+ 2 ~ )
were obtained
Up to this angle,
From the data the following lattice :
a = 7.063 b = 8.825 c = 10.719 = 98.37
÷ ~ ~ ~
0.O10 A 0.011 O.01L~ 0.10 degrees
Vol. 10, No. 5
CYCLOOCTATETRAENYL
TABLE
Partial
COMPOUNDS
II
X-roy Powder Diffraction
Resu~ta
. . . (chromium r~Jdiation; K_a . °'2909~' .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
; k I .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2@cxlc" .
.
0 1 1~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
for (CsH8)2P:~
2.o848~"
KS l
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2"I)01[..~:"
Icslc " .
417
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
lob~, .
.
.
.
.
.
17.68
2.0
0 1 I
19.45
1 0 1
2Io06
] 0 i~ 1 1 0 {8
21.93 2 1 o94
0~6 i. 2
O 0 25
22.68
0.5
! 0 1 1 1 0
24.13 24.14
3.0 6.0
O O ~
24.95
2.5
24.9t
2.j~
0 2 0
30.09
1.2
30.02
i.',
i
32.88
2.3
32.82
5
1 I 2~ 1 2 I~
33.57 33.58
0.2 0.5
_
33.57
i
1 1 2 I 2 1
37.01 37.02
1.0 2°6
"1. ~
}7.05
2 0 0
38°28
1.0
0 2 2
39.48
! 0 3
39.90
0 1 3
40.86
1.3
40.82
~.5
1 1
41.53
1.4
41.48
1.5
2 1 1 1 0 3
44.98 45.15
1.7 1.2
O 3 1
47.67
1.8
2 0 2 2 2 0
49.43 49.44
1.2 1.4
! 3 0
49.98
- 1 2 3 0 0 4
-
-
-
I 2
-2
17.61
4
10.0
19.50
10
6.1
2~.06
5
.97
4
~
21
22.69 }
24.~I
0.5 I0
~: :18.25
I
0.6
39.61
0.5
1.1
39-93
0.9
}
45 Otl " 47.67
1.5
49"45
2
1.9
50.09
1
50.77
1.2
5.50.73
O.b
51.20
1.2
51.21
o.b
2 1 3 - 2 2 2
52.90 5~.26
I. I 1.7
53"19
3;
1 1 4
54.52
1.~
54.43
2
-
1 2 3 1 3 2
55 -21 55.23
1.3 1.6
--
55.21
5
1 3 2
58.06
-
3
~
b8.o6
o
1
58.41
1.4
0.4
} ~
~ ~
418
CYCLOOCTATETRAENYL COMPOUNDS
Vol. 10, No. 5
TABLE ll(cont) .
.
.
.
.
h .
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
"~
"'calc. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
* .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
Ic~!c. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2 2 2
58.96
1.0
1 1 4 2 0 4
60.14 60.38
1.3 0.5
0 2 4
6o.54
1.0
3 1 0 2 1 3 2 3 1
61.14 6!.35 61.38
3 0 1 0 4 0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
20obs. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
iobs. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
58.99
0.5
~
60.27
2.5
1.2 1.2 1.5
] ~
61.41
4
62.48 62.56
0.7 0.7
~
62.45
0.5
3 1 2
63.18
0.8
63.13
0.5
2 3 1
64.04
0.9
64.15
I
1 4 1 3 2 1
66.79 67.10
1.1 0.9
66.88
I
2 2 4
68.94
0.9
68.95
I
2 2 3 3
3 4 2 1
70.51 70.78 70.89 70.90
0.8 0.4 0.8 0.7
70.84
2
1 0 5 1 3 4
71.86 71.89
0.4 0.6
~
71.89
1
1 2 5 2 1 5
73.76 74.27
0.6 0.7
~
74.02
0.5
3 1 4 1 3 4 1 4 3
76.52 76.80 76.82
0.6 1.0 0.4
~
76.67
1
3 0 3 3 3 0 2 3 3
77.67 77.70 77.88
0.3 0.5 0.8
~
77.75
1
2 2 4 2 4 2
78.79 78.82
0.5 0.6
78.63
I
4 0 0 1 1 6 O 5 1
81.95 82.27 82.28
0.2 0.4 0.4
~
82.30
0.5
0 3 5 2 4 2
83.49 83.61
0.6 0.6
J
83.60
0.5
3 0 1 2
J
* B~sed on the lattice parameters given in the text, with a NelsonRiley extrapolation correction.
Low intensity lines which were
not observed experimentally were omitted from this column.
Vol. 10, No. 5
C Y C L O O C T A T E T R A E N Y L COMPOUNDS
419
With two formulae per unit cell, these values [!ead to ~ calculated density of 2.21 g cm -3, which is slightly lower than the w~lues of 2.22 and 2.29 g cm -~ ~ reported
6 , respectively,
thorium and ursnium compounds° r~diotion
Exposures
for the corresponding
t;~her with the copper X-
led e:;sentio.]~y to the s~me lattice p~r:~eter w~]ues, w~th
error limits c:~. 2.5 times !z~rger.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We th~nk tile Institut Interuniversitaire for financisl support. Research L~boratory,
de~ Sc'_enees
We thcmk ~lso Dr. J.L. Burns
Nucl@z~ires
(Tr~nsur<~nium
Osk Ridge N~.tion~! L~'bor:~tory) for pe~'forming the
intensity calculation.
REFERENCES I. D.G. KAR~IKER, J.A. STONE, E.R. JONES a~d N. E D E L S T ~ N , J. Am. Chem. Soc. 4841, 92, 1970 2. J. GOFFART, J. FUGER, B. GILBERT, B. KANELLAKOPULOS Inorg. Nuc!. Chem. Letters 403, 8, 1972 3. F. BAUMGARTNER, E.O. FISCHER, Angewo Chem. 182, _5, 1969
B. KANELLAKOP[~OS
u n d G.DUYCKAERTS
~r~d P. LAUBEREA]]
4. D. BROWN and F.J. JONES, J. Chem. Soc. (A) 719, 1967
5. D.E. WILLIAMS, Ames Lab. Report IS-I052
(1964)
6o D.K. SMITH, University of CaliforniT~, Lawrence BerkeTcy L~b. ReEort UCRL-7196 (1963) 7. A. AVDEEV, K.N. RAYMOND, K.O. IIODGSON and A. ZALKIN, Inorg. Chem., 1083, 11, 1972 8. K.W. BAGNALL, D. BROWN and D.G. ilOLAH, J. Chem. Soc. (A) 1149, 1968 9. L. HOCKX, J. GOFFART, G. DUYCKAERTS Spectrochim. Acta, in press°
~md P. TEYSSIE