120
Letters
to
the Editor
NURSING EXPERIENCE FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS
SiR,-I welcome the letter last week by Mr. Carruthers and Mr. Richardson, for it calls attention to the necessity for giving the student some practical experience of the nursing and management of patients. It is good for young men to dream dreams of fellowships and professorial chairs, but it is even better for them to realise the part that good nursing plays in the As a cure of disease and alleviation of discomfort. country doctor who has frequently to advise and help relatives to nurse patients in primitive and unsuitable surroundings, I am often relieved and-it must be confessed-secretly ashamed to see what improvement in the patient’s condition takes place with an occasional visit from the district nurse. Three weeks’ experience in the wards will not make a nurse, but it may at least give the young physician a better understanding of how much he will in future be dependent on the skill and devotion to duty of the -
nursing profession. Goulceby,
near
Louth,
ill-acquainted with the practical details of these gpera,tions, or with ward routine. It is a pity that any addition, however valuable, should be made to an already heavy curriculum ; but as a final-year student. I consider that in the past two years I have done much of less value than nursing. J. A. EDMNOTON.
Charing Cross Hospital Medical School.
SiB,—I do not wish to express an opinion on the complaint of Mr. Carruthers and Mr. Richardson against having to undertake a spell of nursing duty. Arguments be advanced on both sides. I would only suggest that those who do not like the idea should, instead, spend at least three weeks in the wards as patients-preferably as sufferers frota something which produces helplessness and malaise, or as can
’
subjects of
’
surgical operation. This is a part of the medical student’s education for which we can hardly provide deliberately; but, if anything could be more instructive than nursing, it is a
undoubtedly being nursed. London, E.1.
ALEX COMFORT.
.
Lines.
E. C. CORDEAUX.
SIR,-Present-day nursing examinations seem to be turning their candidates into doctors. Perhaps the probationer might spend a few weeks as houseman to learn the rudiments and difficulties of his job. My own sympathy and support goes to the students of the London Hospital, shortly to be handing out medicines and milk puddings under the critical eye of their ward-sisters. Not only has someone hit on the bright idea of turning them into junior pros (even though the rank is temporary and honorary) but you rap their spokesmen over the knuckles when, they start complaining about it. It just isn’t worth it (even though future generations will incline their heads appreciatively and murmur, 44 you can tell he’s a London man-knows all about bedpans "). If the student doesn’t appreciate the niceties of nursing at the time, he won’t bea houseman over a couple of weeks without realising all the difficulties the nurses have to put up with-the sister will spend most of her day telling him. The medical curriculum is already chaotically arranged and overburdened, so why inflict on the poor student, who has hardly time left to play rugger or Chopin according to taste, additional instruction in the work of related but obviously distinct hospital services ? The signalman doesn’t have to drive an occasional engine, the editor isn’t expected to serve his time on the linotype, and nobody thinks the worse of Mr. Strachey for not doing his own cooking. If the other hospitals follow your advice and take the London’s lead, they might as well do the job properly. Every student should spend a month taking X rays, a few weeks preparing the hospital potatoes, undergo a course of floor-polishing under the head wardmaid, and have his stomach taken out to appreciate the rudiments and difficulties of being a patient. ,
"
"
w
-
General Hospital, Nottingham.
GORDON OSTLERE.
SiR,-From personal experience I must disagree with
correspondents from the London Hospital medical college. During the war I was engaged for a time in full-time civilian nursing, and though there is no single thing which I can say is a valuable lesson learnt then, since commencing my clinical course I am more than ever sure that the ideal introduction to a medical career is a period of nursing. Patients regard their .dresser as a member of the medical staff. seen only for a few minutes at a time ; your
and the relationship is very different from that with a member of the nursing staff where there must, at worst, be toleration on both sides for hours at a time-a valuable discipline which can only be assessed by those who have experienced it. Long experience is needed to judge accurately the condition of a patient " putting on his act " for the doctor-a fact quickly appreciated by the nurses, who see him without the temporary tonic, of a visit from the medical staff. The comments of sisters on the remedial measures ordered by housemen suggest that many of the newly qualified are very
OXYGEN THERAPY IN SHOCK
SIR,-Irrespective of its cause, shock is always attended by a slowing of the circulation and by unsatisfactory oxygenation throughout the body. During its passage through the tissues, the blood may give off 80% of its oxygen. Under such conditions the oxygen in the venous blood will be 20 %, compared with the normal 60 %, which is equivalent to a reduction of the partial pressure of the oxygen in the capillaries from about 40 to 15 mm. Hg. The consequence will be hypoxia in the tissues. The view formerly held, that hypöxaemia gives rise to greater permeability of the capillaries, with a progressive loss of plasma into the tissues, has been disputed in the light of Nickerson’s experiments.1 It has been superseded by the observation that in hypoxia a vasodepressor substance with vasodilating properties, is formed in the liver and muscle tissues. This substance. which is inactivated by normal liver tissue, is supposed to be the primary factor in the causation of irreversible ’
shock. The disturbance of metabolism in hypoxia gives rise to acidosis, which further impairs metabolism. Thus hypoxia initiates a vicious cycle. Together with its sequelae, it is an increasing menace to the patient with shock. The natural treatment of hypoxia is an inorease of the oxygen content in the inspired air. This is obvious in cases with pulmonary damage which prevents the normal oxygen saturation of the blood in the- lungsi.e., arterial hypoxia. But also in the stagnant hypoxia of shock oxygen treatment is of greatest valued* In such cases, however, the deficiency of oxygen is liable to be overlooked, since it often does not manifest itself in
cyanosis.
In stagnant hypoxia caused by shock the haemoglobin -of the blood, when it leaves the lungs, is saturated with oxygen to a normal extent-i.e., 97-98%. At the same time the blood contains a minor amount of oxygen in physically dissolved form, 0-26 ml. per 100 ml. If the patient is given pure oxygen, complete saturation of the haemoglobin will be obtained-i.e., an increase of its oxygen carriage by merely a small percentage, or about 0-5 ml. per 100 ml, of blood. In addition, however. the amount of physically dissolved oxygen will increase by about 1-5 ml. Thus, when pure oxygen is inhaled, about 2 ml. more of oxygen is carried by 100 ml. of blood than when ordinary air is breathed. Under normal conditions 100 ml. of blood gives off about 6 mi. of oxygen during its passage through the tissues. The gain in oxygen-carriage when pure oxygen is inhaled -i.e., 2 ml.-therefore corresponds to a third of this normal requirement. A considerable surplus of oxygen is thus obtained. Nickerson, J. L. Amer. J. Physiol. 1945, 144, 429. 2 Schorr, E., Zweifach, B. W., Furchgott, K. F. Science, 1945, 102, 489. 3. Schnedorf, J. G., Orr, T. G. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 1941, 73, 79, 495. Davis, H. A. Arch. Surg. 1941, 43, 1. 4. Melton, G. Lancet, 1943, i, 481. 1.
’
121 The principal effect of oxygen therapy in shock is that the oxygen deficiency in the tissues is counteracted ; but, probably, there is also a directly favourable effect on the disturbed fluid balance. In healthy persons, after inhalation of 100 % of oxygen for only a few minutes there is dilution of the blood, shown by a fall of the haematocrit and serum-protein levels. Hitzenberger and Molenaar5 observed in 4 out of5 persons, after the lapse of twenty minutes, an average increase of about 400 ml. in the circulating Yohune of blood, equivalent to an ordinary transfusion. This effect, however, is transient, and within an hour from the start of inhalation of the oxygen the original state of the fluid balance is restored. A transient slowing of the pulse-rate has likewise been observed. Similar experiments in connexion with shock have not yet been’made, but Melton 4 in treating shock with oxygen observed a slowing of the pulse-rate by more than 10 beats per min.. and (in about half the patients) a rise of both systolic and diastolic blood-pressure by more than 20 mm. Hg. How the oxygen produces this effect on the circulation has not been ascertained. For the present we must content ourselves with noting that the effect is very favourable and may possibly suffice to break the vicious cycle initiated by shock. It may now be asked whether the patient with shock incurs any risk by inhaling pure oxygen. Ever since oxygen was discovered it has been realised that high concentrations of the gas (over 60 % at atmospheric pressure) in the inspired air entail for a healthy person toxic effects which after a time endanger life. At ordinary atmospheric pressure the lung tissue is damaged, and death from suffocation ensues : in $090 % oxygen small animals, such as mice, guineapigs, and rabbits, die within two or three days. Extensive experiments have been made6 and it has been supposed that oxygen, like phosgene and nitrous gases, directly irritates -the lung tissue. Time-limits for the inhalation of pure oxygen have accordingly been fixed, differing according to different workers from 4 to 24 hours’ Thus the use of pure oxygen is still viewed with great respect im theory. But in practice the toxic effects have not been taken so seriously. Nevertheless no clinical case of oxygen toxicity has been observed. This can be partly explained by the fact that clinical methods of administration do not supply oxygen continuously at such high percentage as in experiments. But the main reason is that the misgivings have been based on false analogy. Observations on healthy people; do not necessarily apply to those who are hypoxsemic, and investigating this possibility I found6 that animals rendered hypoxaemic by non-lethal pulmonary injuries survived in oxygen of high concentrations much longer than healthy .controls. This result was surprising, since the opposite would have been expected if oxygen directly irritates the lungs. Injury to the lungs by oxygen in high concentration is evidently caused in some other, less direct, way-possibly through disturbance in the biochemical constitution of the blood. At any rate it has been made clear that inhalation of pure oxygen at atmospheric pressure, which for healthy people entails certain risks, does not endanger a patient with wellHence a patient with marked oxygen deficiency. traumatic shock can inhale pure oxygen for an indefinite length of time, so long as the shock has not been abolished. A reservation should perhaps be made in the case of pulmonary damage with haemorrhagic tendency, as in blast injuries. Inasmuch as it has been shown-e.g., by von Euler and Liljestrand 7-that oxygen tends to dilate the lung capillaries, it should be administered to such patients with caution, for fear of aggravating
haemorrhage. As already indicated, the
oxygen should be administered
principle as any other drug-i.e., in a dosage regulated by the requirement. Every patient likely to have shock should receive oxygen prophylactically in a concentration not exceeding 60% at A patient already ordinary atmospheric pressure. on
same
5.
Hitzenberger, A., Molenaar, H. Klin. Wschr. 1934, 13, 1599. Ohlsson, W. T. L. Acta. med. scand. 1947, 128, suppl. 190. 7. von Enler, U. S., Liljestrand, G. Acta physiol. scand. 1946,
6.
12, 301.
affected by shock should be treated with 100% oxygen until the shock is abolished. To sum up, oxygen is of great value in the treatment of shock, not only for the suppression of the hypoxia but also for its good effect on the circulation, similar to that of a transfusion. There is no time-limit for treatment with 100 % oxygen : it can safely continue so long as the shock itself continues. WILHELM T. L. OHLSSON. Orebro, Sweden.
SURFACE-ACTIVE SUBSTANCES AND ANTIBIOTICS
SiR,-In the course oftheM.R.C. report on laboratory tests of streptomycin therapy of tuberculosis (Nov. 27) the use of Dubos-Davis medium is described, and mention is made of Fisher’s1 observation on the effect of Tween 80 on the sensitivity of tubercle bacilli to streptomycin. This is not an isolated example of the effect of surfaceactive substances on the susceptibility of micro-organisms to antibiotics. Fisher quotes McCulloch : " This is probably due to an increase in the rate of diffusion of the bactericide into the bacterial cells, the velocity of diffusion being increased by the reduction of surface
tension." I have observed the apparent adjuvant action of sodium desoxycholate and of Teepol X, a synthetic detergent of the higher alkyl sulphate type, on the penicillin-sensitivity of Proteus and other gram-negative
bacilli. These observations suggest that more than an increase in the rate of diffusion of the antibiotic, is involved. In the case of Proteus, for instance, an increased inhibitory zone may be observed in the cup-plate method to quite low concentrations of penicillin when the surface-active substance is incorporated in the medium in concentration insumcient alone to inhibit the growth of the organism. It is well known that many of these substances inhibit the swarming of Proteu8,2 but it is not this action which makea the organism appear more sensitive. A plain agar cup plate, streaked with Proteus ajid containing 5-10 units of penicillin in the cup, will show after incpbiltion no inhibition zone, or a zone of partial inhibition, the culture always growing to the margin of the cup. The phenomenon described by Gardner3 is seen only on microscopy of the organism. The bacilli in the area near the cup exposed to sublethal concentrations of penicillin show extraordinary aberrant forms. For some distance from the cup margin the culture consists almost entirely of these filamentous, coiled and enlarged bacilli. These aberrant forms are a feature of most inhibition-zone plates, even with sensitive organisms; they are found at the edge of the inhibition zone as a band of varying width. When, however, 0-2% Teepol X is incorporated into the plain agar medium 5-10 units of penicillin in the cup will produce a well-defined zone of complete inhibition. This zone of complete inhibition is usually surrounded by a narrow zone of aberrant forms. In some experiments there has been an almost complete absence of these forms. Further, if Teepol X is added to the penicillin cup on plain agar medium after incubation, a zone, of lysis gradually appears round the cup. This lysis involves the aberrant form to a much greater degree than the normal form, and shows in the stained film as a granularity and a marked loss of staining power. It should be added that 50% Teepol X has a negligible inhibitory action on Proteus when tested alone in the cup plate. It would thus appear that when Proteus is exposed to sublethal concentrations of penicillin the abnormal bacilli produced are more susceptible to the physical action of Teepol X than are normal forms. The result is an apparent increase in the sensitivity of the organism. Only an analogy, of course, can be drawn between the action described and the Tween-80/streptomycin effect. The slow growth of tubercle bacilli would certainly favour a similar mode of action. It is worth noting that in Fisher’s experiments with three resistant strains of tubercle bacilli, the addition of 0-2% albumin to his Tween-80 medium only partially reversed the effect of the Tween 80 and still resulted in an increased sensitivity ’
1. 2. 3.
Fisher, M. W. Amer. Rev. Tuberc. 1948, 57, 58. Lominski, I., Lendrum, A. C. J. Path. Bact. 1942, 54, 421. Gardner, A. D. Lancet, 1945, i, 658.