PE blends

PE blends

Accepted Manuscript Viscoelastic phase separation and crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition in bitumen/SBS/PE blends Tian Xia, Yaping Qin, Jianhui...

2MB Sizes 3 Downloads 57 Views

Accepted Manuscript Viscoelastic phase separation and crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition in bitumen/SBS/PE blends Tian Xia, Yaping Qin, Jianhui Xu, Longmei Zhou, Wenqiang Chen, Jianfeng Dai PII:

S0032-3861(18)30883-8

DOI:

10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.042

Reference:

JPOL 20927

To appear in:

Polymer

Received Date: 20 July 2018 Revised Date:

31 August 2018

Accepted Date: 20 September 2018

Please cite this article as: Tian Xia, Yaping Qin, Jianhui Xu, Longmei Zhou, Wenqiang Chen, Jianfeng Dai, Viscoelastic phase separation and crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition in bitumen/SBS/PE blends, Polymer (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.042 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Viscoelastic phase separation can proceed in bitumen modified by SBS/PE blend.



The effect of phase separation on rheology is much stronger in the bitumen/SBS/PE with higher fraction of PE. The crystalline to amorphous transition of PE-rich phase can stabilize the rheological property of bitumen/SBS/PE due to the melting enthalpy.

SC M AN U TE D EP AC C



RI PT



ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Viscoelastic phase separation and crystalline-to-amorphous

2

phase transition in bitumen/SBS/PE blends

3

Tian Xiaa*, Yaping Qina, Jianhui Xub*, Longmei Zhoua, Wenqiang Chena, Jianfeng Daia,b

4

a

5

400054, China

6

b

7

Chongqing 400067, China

8

Abstract

9

Viscoelastic phase separation (VPS) can happen in polymer modified bitumen due to

10

the large dynamic asymmetry between polymer and bitumen. The network formation

11

induced by VPS can enhance the rheological property of bituminous materials. In this

12

SBS/PE modified bitumen, multiple phase separation involving VPS can occur due to

13

the immiscibility between either two components of them. Moreover, the

14

crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition of PE-rich phase also influences the

15

rheological property due to its large amount of melting enthalpy. Two different

16

composition ratios of SBS/PE are chosen to explore the correlation between phase

17

transition and rheological property. The conclusion obtained by this study may

18

enlighten the design of energy storage bituminous materials modified by polymer

19

blend which possess crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition and viscoelastic phase

20

separation.

21

Key words: viscoelastic phase separation; crystalline-to-amorphous; rheology;

22

polymer blend; modified bitumen

RI PT

College of Material Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

China Merchants Chongqing Communications Technology Research and Design Institute,

*

Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (T. Xia), [email protected] (J. Xu) 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

1 Introduction As the most popular thermoplastic elastomer, styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS)

3

triblock copolymer has a two-phase morphology of spherical PS block domains

4

within a matrix of PB. Between the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of PS blocks (~

5

100oC) and PB blocks (~ −90oC), PS behaves as glassy while PB behaves as rubbery

6

and a physical crosslink can be formed [1, 2]. The existence of physical crosslinks

7

makes SBS is one of the best candidate for bitumen modification [3, 4], which can

8

significantly improve its elasticity and strength.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

2

For the last decade, the addition of inorganic fillers into SBS modified bitumen has

10

been attracted much attention due to its extraordinary ability in mechanical property

11

enhancement and cost reduction [5-8]. However, it is difficult to make a well

12

distribution of these fillers in bitumen due to their micro- or nanoscale size for easy

13

aggregation, and their high melting temperature made them always performing solid

14

state even during the melting blending process of bitumen modification. The random

15

distribution of inorganic fillers and their aggregation would make the bituminous

16

material heterogeneous and weaken its service performance [9].

EP

AC C

17

TE D

9

Thus, we are recently trying to explore a new route of polymer modified bitumen

18

with good service performance and available engineering production. The blending of

19

crystalline polymer and thermoplastic elastomer as a modifier for bitumen provides a

20

theoretical possibility for that. On one hand, the stiffness (G*) and elasticity (δ) of

21

bitumen can probably be synchronously enhanced by the coexistence of rigid

22

crystalline polymer and elastic elastomer. On the other hand, polymer blend is easy to 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

disperse in bitumen since the polymer chain can be swollen by light component under

2

molten state, which is easy for sample preparation in industry. Our recent study [10] focused on the effect of third crystalline polymer such as PE,

4

PP or POM on the phase structure and rheological behavior of bitumen/SBS blends. It

5

is found that the bitumen/SBS/PE system has the highest value and the lowest δ value,

6

making SBS/PE blend an ideal candidate for bitumen modification.

RI PT

3

Owing to the incompatibility and different densities between PE and bitumen,

8

phase separation can also exist in bitumen/PE system [11, 12] and their phase

9

morphology is closely associated with polymer concentration [13] and structural

10

parameters [14]. Thus, the phase behavior of bitumen/SBS/PE blend would be very

11

complex due to the immiscibility between either two components of them [10, 15].

M AN U

SC

7

It is reported that [16] there is an obvious contrast in complex modulus G∗ and

13

complex viscosity η∗ between SBS and base bitumen, implying a large dynamic

14

asymmetry in their blends. This contrast provides a prerequisite of viscoelastic phase

15

separation (VPS) occurrence, during which a transient network structure can be

16

formed [17-20]. It is found that when the SBS fraction exceeds a critical value (8 wt.%

17

of bitumen), the bitumen/SBS blend proceeds VPS at high temperature [16].

EP

AC C

18

TE D

12

Regarding the prerequisite for VPS occurrence, the formation of network

19

structure can also be expected in bitumen/SBS/PE blends. Moreover, the

20

crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE will generate amount of melting enthalpy,

21

which may influence the actual tested temperature and corresponding rheological

22

behavior. The main objective of this work is to compare the effect of phase structures 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT before and after viscoelastic phase separation on the rheological behavior of

2

bitumen/SBS/PE blends, which is accompanied by crystalline-to-amorphous phase

3

transition of PE.

4

2 Materials and Experiments

5

2.1 Materials and sample preparation

RI PT

1

Bitumen (AH-70#) used in this paper was provided by SK company in Korea. The

7

fraction of saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes in this bitumen were 5.9%,

8

59.8%, 19.1% and 15.2% respectively, measured by TLC-FID [16, 21]. SBS (1301)

9

was supplied by Yueyang Baling Company, Sinopec, which was a linear structure

10

polymer containing 30% styrene by weight with Mw of ~105 g/mol. PE (HDPE,

11

DMDA-8008) with a melt flow index (MFI) of 7.3 g/10min and density of 1.047

12

g/cm3 was obtained from Dushanzi Petrochemical Corp [22]. The melting point of PE

13

is about 133.5

M AN U

TE D

14

SC

6

measured by DSC.

The base bitumen was heated in an iron container. The temperature kept invariable at 180

, and polymers were added to the bitumen in a stirring machine for 30 min.

16

After that the mixing was continued at that temperature using a high shear mixer with

17

5000 rpm for 2 h under 180

18

bitumen can be taken as 100 wt.%. To ensure the formation of network structure, the

19

fraction of one polymer was fixed as 15wt.% of bitumen. Two different compositional

20

ratios of bitumen/SBS/PE blends were chosen as (100/15/5) and (100/5/15). For

21

abbreviation, these two blends are named as S15E5 and E15S5, respectively. The

22

annealed blends are represented as “An” in front of the blend name.

AC C

EP

15

. For all the bitumen/SBS/PE blends, the ratio of base

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

2.2 Experiments An optical microscope (BK-POL-TR, Optec company, China) equipped with a

3

CCD camera and a hot stage was used for in-situ phase structure observation. A drop

4

of a heated sample was placed on a cover glass for microscopy observation. The

5

annealing temperature is kept at 180

6

morphology evolution.

RI PT

2

for 60 min in order to observe the phase

Rheological test was performed on a rheometer (AR 1500ex, TA Instruments, USA)

8

with 25 mm parallel plate and 1 mm gap geometry. Two oscillating mode tests were

9

employed as follows: (i) Dynamic frequency sweep test with a sweep frequency range

M AN U

SC

7

10

of 100~0.1 rad/s. (ii) Temperature ramp step test with a heating rate of 1

11

60

12

above tests to ensure their linear viscoelastic behavior. It should be noted that, two

13

kinds of samples, including the original and the samples after being annealed at 180

14

for 60 min were compared to study the correlation between phase structure and

15

rheological property.

, the frequency was fixed as 10 rad/s. The strain was set as 5% for both

EP

TE D

to 140

/min from

Thermal characteristics of materials were investigated by a differential scanning

17

calorimeter (DSC Q20, TA Instruments). Samples weighing about 4~10 mg sliced

18

from compressed specimens were examined. During scanning, the samples were

19

protected under a nitrogen flow of 50 ml/ min. Temperature sweep test of polymer

20

modified bitumen from −50 ℃ to 200 ℃ with a heating rate of 15℃/min to study the

21

effect of annealing on the crystalline behavior of PE-rich phase.

22

3 Results and discussion

AC C

16

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Fig. 1 displays the phase structure of S15E5 and E15S5. As Fig. 1(a) shows, the

2

region denoted by white arrow is the SBS-rich phase, and it acts as a matrix although

3

the fraction of SBS is only 15 wt.%, far less than bitumen fraction. The black region

4

represents bitumen-rich phase, and they are dispersed in SBS-rich matrix. The bright

5

region denoted by red arrow is PE-rich phase, and the PE-rich droplets are almost

6

round shape with a large distribution of droplet size. This result is related to

7

viscoelastic phase separation (VPS) as we reported previously[16], since the dynamic

8

asymmetry between bitumen and polymer is very large. The phase structure

9

corresponds to the initial stage of VPS, during which the bitumen-rich phase with fast

10

dynamics forms “holes” on SBS-rich matrix with slow dynamics. It is noted that the

11

VPS in S15E5 occurs between bitumen and SBS, since the fraction of PE is too less to

12

form a continuous phase. PE-rich droplets adhere to the SBS-rich phase. In fact, the

13

SBS-rich matrix and bitumen-rich droplets can be regarded as inverted droplet-matrix

14

structure, in which the matrix is composed of relatively minor phase while droplets

15

are composed of relatively major phase.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

16 17

Fig. 1 Phase structure of (a) S15E5 and (b) E15S5 observed by optical microscopy under

18

transmission at room temperature.

19

When the composition ratio of SBS/PE changes, the phase structure exhibits

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT different accordingly. From Fig. 1(b), we can see a typical network structure

2

composed of polymer. The network tube is mainly composed of SBS-rich phase and

3

many isolated PE-rich droplets. It can be regarded that, lots of PE-rich droplets

4

assemble in SBS-rich phase, leading to the formation of SBS-rich network even SBS

5

is the minority in E15S5. This structure resembles the kinetically trapped

6

co-continuous polymer morphologies through intraphase gelation of nanoparticles, as

7

reported in polystyrene and poly(vinyl methyl ether) blend by the addition of

8

nanorods of CdSe [23]. Noticed the compositional ratio of SBS and PE in E15S5, the

9

SBS-rich network should be induced by the gelation of rigid PE-rich droplets.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

To study the stability of phase structure under high temperature, an annealing

11

process was carried out. The temperature is kept at 180 . The corresponding

12

morphology evolutions are displayed in Fig. 2. It is known from Fig. 2(a) that once

13

reaching 180

14

A typical viscoelastic network forms at 30 min, and then it still exists after 60 min.

15

During the phase separation, PE-rich droplets tend to migrate into SBS-rich network.

16

It should be noted that, the original reason for phase separation in the polymer blend

17

modified bitumen should be the same as in the bitumen/SBS or bitumen/PE blends [1,

18

2], which is the competition between polymer chains and asphaltenes to absorb the

19

insufficient light components of bitumen.

TE D

10

AC C

EP

, the SBS-rich network of S15E5 gradually forms via VPS mechanism.

7

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1 2

Fig. 2 Phase morphology evolution of (a) S15E5 and (b) E15S5 observed by optical microscopy

3

under 180

. The scale bar denotes 100 µm.

The morphology evolution of E15S5 is shown in Fig. 2(b). The dynamics of VPS is

5

relatively fast compared with S15E5. At the initial stage, the PE-rich droplets are

6

assembled in SBS-rich phase which can be clearly seen in Fig. 1(b), leading to the

7

formation of SBS-rich network. However, after annealing at 180

8

droplets coalesce with each other, forming a PE-rich network. Meanwhile, the

9

SBS-rich phase is squeezed out of PE-rich network, and transforms into many tiny

10

droplets, attaching along the network interface. After 30 min, the network tubes get

11

much wider and the SBS-rich droplets located at the interface between PE-rich phase

12

and bitumen-rich phase like a necklace. This phase separation process in E15S5 is

13

similar to the formation of bijels (bicontinuous interfacially jammed emulsion gels).

14

Bijels are formed by jamming of colloidal particles at the interface between two

15

partially miscible fluids undergoing spinodal decomposition under nonequilibrium

16

state [24, 25]. For the E15S5 system, the PE droplets act as the “particles” at the

17

interface between bitumen-rich phase and SBS-rich phase. Similar structure can be

18

also found in PS/PB/NP [26] and PMMA/SAN/NP [27] blends in which nanoparticles

19

jam at the interface.

for 10 min, PE

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

4

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The above discussion about phase morphology suggests that the main mechanism

2

for phase separation is VPS in both S15E5 and E15S5. There is a large difference on

3

phase structure between the original and annealed sample, which will influence their

4

own rheological behavior as discussed in the following part.

RI PT

1

The complex modulus (G*) variations with frequency obtained by dynamic

6

frequency sweep are given in Fig. 3. We can know that for both bitumen modified by

7

polymer blends, G* increases with frequency but decreases with temperature. Noticed

8

that Fig. 3(a)-(d) have the same Y-axis range, it is obvious that the G* value of E15S5

9

is higher than that of S15E5 for both original and annealed samples.

5

10

M AN U

SC

5

(a)S15E5

5

10

4

4

10

10

3

G*(Pa)

G*(Pa)

(b)E15S5

10

2

10

3

10

2

10

o

TE D

40 C o

60 C

1

10

1

10

o

80 C o

100 C

0

10

2

4

6 8

0.1

1

4 6 8

ω(rad/s)

2

10

100

AC C

10

2

1

0.1

6 8

4 6 8

ω(rad/s)

2

10

4 6 8

100

(d)AnE15S5

3

10

2

1

10

0

4

2

1

10

10

2

6 8

4

10

10

4

10 G*(Pa)

3

10

2

0.1

5

EP

4

10

10

0

10

4 6 8

(c)AnS15E5

5

10

G*(Pa)

2

0

2

4 6 8

1

10

2

10

4 6 8

100

2

0.1

ω(rad/s)

4

6 8

2

4 6 8

1

10

2

4 6 8

100

ω(rad/s)

11

Fig. 3 Complex modulus variation of (a)S15E5, (b)E15S5, (c)annealed S15E5 and (d) annealed E15S5

12

with frequency at different temperatures.

13

In Fig. 3(a), the G*~ω curves of S15E5 at different temperatures are parallel with

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

each other. The similar slope of G* variation with frequency indicates the rather

2

stability of phase structure at these temperatures. As for E15S5, the G* dependence on

3

ω becomes relatively weak when the temperature is higher than 80

4

implies a change of phase structure with temperature.

RI PT

5

. This result

Fig. 3(c)-(d) display the complex modulus variation of bitumen/SBS/PE blends for 60 min. In Fig. 3(c), the increased slope of G*~ω curves

after annealing at 180

7

at higher temperature for annealed S15E5 indicates that the phase structure has a

8

much stronger dependence on frequency when temperature increases. Different from

9

annealed S15E5, the G*~ω curves at 80

M AN U

SC

6

and 100

of annealed E15S5 shown in Fig.

3(d) overlap with each other. Usually, the corresponding modulus or viscosity should

11

reduce significantly if there is an increase in temperature by 20

12

for materials to deformation or flow would be weakened under high temperature. It is

13

surprising that the complex modulus is almost invariable at 80

14

annealed E15S5, revealing a remarkable stability under these temperatures. Regarding

15

the relatively higher faction of PE in E15S5, this stability may be associated with the

16

crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich phase. This speculation will be

17

discussed later.

, since the resistance

and 100

in the

EP

AC C

18

TE D

10

To directly compare the complex modulus between S15E5 and E15S5, the

19

rheological master curves at a reference temperature of 60

20

by using the time-temperature superposition (TTS) principle. The applicability of TTS

21

principle in base bitumen or polymer modified bitumen systems is dependent on the

22

homogeneity of structure and its susceptibility to temperature[28-30]. 10

were obtained in Fig. 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT It is noted that TTS principle is well applicable for the original and annealed S15E5

2

blends rather than E15S5 blends. From Fig. 4(a), an overlap of master curves occurs

3

for original and annealed S15E5 in a low frequency region (ω<0.01rad/s). Usually, the

4

modulus at low frequency reflects the relaxation process of structure with large size.

5

For this polymer modified bitumen systems, it corresponds to the relaxation process

6

of polymer-rich phase structure which is rather slow compared with bitumen

7

relaxation. Combined with Fig. 2(a), the overlap of G* at low frequency region for

8

S15E5 should be related to the barely changeable viscoelastic network structure with

9

microscale size after annealing for 60min. In the whole range of frequency, the G* for

SC

M AN U

S15E5 is not changed significantly by annealing.

10

(a)S15E5

10

3

annealed 10

o

40 C

2

10

o

60 C

original

5

(b)E15S5

4

annealed

G*(Pa)

G*(Pa)

10

4

TE D

10

RI PT

1

10

original

3

o

80 C o

100 C

1

0.001

0.1

10

10 1000

2

0.01

ω(rad/s)

0.1

1 10 ω(rad/s)

100

1000

AC C

11

EP

10

12

Fig. 4 Master curves of bitumen/SBS/PE blends at the reference temperature of 60 °C. The solid

13

and hollow symbols represent the original and annealed samples, respectively.

14

As Fig. 4(b) shows, the whole master curve of E15S5 shifts upward after annealing.

15

The evident difference in G* between original and annealed E15S5 suggests that both

16

relaxation processes of fast bitumen and slow phase structure in E15S5 are influenced

17

by the annealing treatment. Among the four samples, the TTS principle can be taken

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

as a failure in the annealed E15S5, implying its susceptibility of phase structure to the

2

tested temperature. Fig. 5 compares the complex viscosity variation with frequency for different blends.

4

The same color represents the same temperature. The original samples are indicated

5

by the solid markers and their corresponding annealed samples are hollow. All the

6

η*~ω curves reveal a strong shear thinning effect in these SBS/PE modified bitumen,

7

regardless of being annealed or not. 5

10

o

40 C

SC

10

RI PT

3

5

o

60 C

4

10

4

M AN U

10

o

80 C

10 10

η*(Pa.s)

10

100 C

3

10

2

10

1

0

10

(a)S15E5

10

2

0.1

4

6 8

2

1

8

4 6 8

ω(rad/s)

10

2

3

2

1

0

(b)E15S5

4 6 8

2

100

TE D

η*(Pa.s)

o

10

0.1

4

6 8

1

2

4

6 8

ω(rad/s)

10

2

4

6 8

100

Fig. 5 Complex viscosity variation of (a)S15E5 and (b)E15S5 with frequency at different temperatures.

10

The solid and hollow symbols represent the original and annealed samples, respectively.

11

EP

9

It is noticed that in Fig. 5 (a), the annealed S15E5 has lower η* value than the original S15E5 at 40

in the high frequency region. This comparison is contrary at

13

other three tested temperatures, under which the annealed S15E5 has higher η* value

14

at high frequencies. Usually, the viscosity reflects the ability for material to resist the

15

flow, which will be influenced by network structure due to the good resistance of

16

crosslinks to deformation.

AC C

12

17

Combined the above morphology results, there should be two kinds of networks in

18

S15E5. One is the viscoelastic SBS-rich network induced by VPS, and the other is the 12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT physical cross-linking network in SBS copolymer itself [10]. The former one is

2

generated by VPS and its characteristic size is on microscale[31]. While the latter one

3

in SBS itself has much smaller size of nanoscale whose effectiveness would diminish

4

above the Tg of PS, but it will reform once cooling down and restore the strength of

5

the copolymer [2].

RI PT

1

Here, the η* value at the high frequency region should be related to the number of

7

physical crosslinks in SBS itself due to its fast relaxation process. For the annealed

8

S15E5, the number of physical crosslinks in SBS itself is reduced by phase separation

9

during which the SBS molecular chains are swollen by light components of bitumen.

M AN U

SC

6

10

At 40

11

more crosslinks in original S15E5 makes it have higher η* value at high frequencies.

12

As tested temperature increases above 60

13

again and keep diffusing from bitumen-rich phase to SBS-rich phase, which further

14

damage the physical crosslinks formed in SBS itself. The extent of this damage in

15

annealed S15E5 is not serious as in original sample, since phase separation has

16

accomplished to some extent for annealed S15E5. Accordingly, the η* value of

17

annealed S15E5 gradually becomes larger than the original one in the high frequency

18

region above 60

EP

TE D

, the light components obtain mobility

AC C

19

, the materials diffusion between bitumen and polymer is restrained, and the

.

Comparing Fig. 5(a) and (b), the effect of annealing on the complex viscosity for

20

S15E5 is weaker than that for E15S5 systems. In Fig. 5(b), the complex viscosity

21

under each tested temperature is improved by an order of magnitude after annealing.

22

The η*~ω curves for annealed E15S5 sample gets overlapped under 80 13

and 100 ,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

consistent with the feature Fig. 3(d) reveals. The improved complex viscosity

2

especially its stability at higher temperature for annealed E15S5 suggests its enhanced

3

ability to resist the flow or rutting from outside at high temperature. Phase angle (δ) reflects the viscoelastic balance of the material behavior, which is

5

defined as the phase difference between stress and strain in an oscillatory test [16].

6

When δ equals 90o the materials can be taken as purely viscous in nature, while δ

7

equals 0o corresponds to purely elastic behavior. Fig. 6 exhibits the phase angle for

8

these different samples.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

4

70

60

δ(degree)

δ(degree)

60 50 40 30

o

2

0.1

4

o

o

80 C

6 8

2

1

4 6 8

10

40

60 C

TE D

(a)S15E5

20

50

30

o

40 C

9

(b)E15S5

70

100 C

2

4

20

6 8

100

2

4

6 8

0.1

ω(rad/s)

2

4 6 8

1

2

4

10

6 8

100

ω(rad/s)

Fig. 6 Phase angle variation of (a)S15E5 and (b)E15S5 with frequency at different temperatures. The

11

solid and hollow symbols represent the original and annealed samples, respectively.

EP

10

Notice that Fig. 6(a) and (b) have the same scale range of Y-axis, it is easy to find

13

out that the δ of S15E5 is larger than that of E15S5 on the whole, reflecting the better

14

elasticity of E15S5. In Fig. 6(a), the δ of annealed S15E5 becomes smaller at 40 , 60

15

and 80 , indicating the better elasticity after annealing. However, δ of annealed

16

S15E5 becomes higher when the test is measured at 100

17

originates from both viscoelastic SBS-rich network and the physical crosslinks in SBS

18

itself. Reminiscent of phase morphology shown in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 2(a), the PE-rich

AC C

12

14

. The elasticity of S15E5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

droplets locate at the bitumen-rich phase in the original S15E5, while they migrate

2

into SBS-rich network after annealing. The existence of rigid PE-rich droplet in

3

SBS-rich network can effectively stabilize the network, maintaining the elasticity of

4

materials. However, the PE-rich droplets are not rigid at 100

5

temperatures since it approaches the melting point of PE. Under this situation, the

6

elasticity of annealed S15E5 would be weaker than the original S15E5, resulting in a

7

higher δ value for annealed S15E5 at 100

9

RI PT

SC

In Fig. 6(b), the elasticity of E15S5 sample at each tested temperature is improved

M AN U

8

.

as they are at low

after annealing at 180

for 60min. It is interesting that for both original and annealed

E15S5 in Fig. 6(b), the δ tends to decrease when the tested temperature gets increased.

11

This trend is contrary to the S15E5 samples displayed in Fig. 6(a). It is easy to

12

understand when the temperature is high, the materials is prone to flow since the

13

molecular motion is active. Accordingly, the materials would be much more viscous at

14

high temperature. Nevertheless, the E15S5 becomes more elastic when tested at

15

higher temperature. This abnormal phenomenon may be related to the existence of

16

PE-rich network. When the temperature is far less than the melting point of PE, the

17

network is rigid since the molecular chains are restraint in the spherulitic crystal

18

structure of PE, revealing a glassy state. As the temperature gradually gets higher but

19

still lower than the melting point of PE, the network would be getting elastic since the

20

molecular chains can gain more ability to move. It can be expected that once the

21

temperature exceeds the melting point of PE, the samples will turn into flow state

22

instantly, performing a prominent viscous material.

AC C

EP

TE D

10

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT To confirm this speculation, a dynamic temperature ramp test was swept on

2

rheometer and the corresponding result in given in Fig. 7. It is seen that the complex

3

modulus of annealed E15S5 sample is much higher than the rest three samples. For

4

the original and annealed S15E5 samples, G* gradually declines as temperature

5

increases and reveals a fluctuation due to the complicated phase structure. The G* of

6

original E15S5 sample exhibits similar variation trend with S15E5 samples but

7

displays a downturn at around 120

8

phase.

3

G*(Pa)

10

2

10

SC

E15S5 AnE15S5 S15E5 AnS15E5

TE D

1

10

60

80

100

120

140

o

T( C)

Fig. 7 Complex modulus variation of temperature measured by dynamic temperature ramp test.

EP

10

which is close to the melting point of PE-rich

M AN U

4

10

9

RI PT

1

Apparently, G* variation of annealed E15S5 is much distinguished from the other

12

three samples. It slightly decreases in the range of 60-80 . Once the temperature

13

exceeds 80 , it can keep almost stable with temperature before 120 . This result is

14

consistent with frequency sweep result displayed in Fig. 3(d). After ~125 , the G* of

15

annealed E15S5 sharply drops at least two orders of magnitude, and then reduces to

16

the same scale with other three samples. Comparing two E15S5 systems, it is obvious

17

that the reduced amplitude due to the crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich

AC C

11

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

phase is much larger in annealed E15S5 than that in original E15S5. This comparison

2

will be further discussed based on the following DSC results shown in Fig. 8. Firstly, it is noted that three replicates were performed for each DSC sweep test in

4

Fig. 8. In the case of good repeatability, the average of the three replicates was used

5

for analysis. As Fig. 8 shows, there is an obvious endothermic peak for each sample,

6

corresponding to the crystalline-to-amorphous transition (melting process) of PE-rich

7

phase. For a strict comparison, the melting peak analysis for each heating curve is

8

limited between 100

9

melting point temperature at endothermic peak for PE-rich phase in original S15E5

SC

RI PT

3

to quantify the Tm and endotherm value. The

M AN U

and 150

10

and E15S5 samples are 123.6

and 124.3 , respectively. After annealing treatment,

11

the Tm for S15E5 and E15S5 are improved to 127.1

12

by annealing could indicate the much more perfect crystalline structure of PE after

13

phase separation at 180

. The improved Tm

TE D

and 127.2

for 60min.

-0.2

EP

-0.4 -0.6

AC C

Exotherm

-0.8 -1.0 -1.2 -1.4

E15S5 AnE15S5 S15E5 AnS15E5

-1.6

80

100

120

140

160

o

T( C)

14 15 16 17

Fig. 8 DSC curves of heating process from 80

to 160

for bitumen/SBS/PE blends before and

after annealing.

It should be noticed that this Tm reflects the crystalline-to-amorphous transition of 17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

PE-rich phase rather than PE single component, since in the multi-component and

2

multi-phase system PE cannot exist independently. From our previous study[10], the

3

Tm of single PE component is 133.5

4

phase. This comparison indicates the better flexibility of semi-crystalline PE

5

molecular chains in the modified bitumen, as they can be partially swollen by some

6

light aromatic components of the bitumen [11]. The melting enthalpy ∆Hm due to

7

crystalline-to-amorphous transition for the original S15E5 and E15S5 samples are 7.2

8

J/g and 25.7 J/g, respectively. These two values are improved to 7.7 J/g and 31.2 J/g

9

respectively after being annealed, implying an increase of crystallinity (fc).

higher than Tm of PE-rich

M AN U

SC

RI PT

, which is ~10

This DSC result can be applied effectively account for the rheologically

11

temperature ramp test result. In S15E5 systems, the PE fraction is too low to

12

significantly influence the G* variation with temperature. As for E15S5 systems, the

13

PE content is enough to absorb the heat generated by temperature increase close to its

14

melting point, leading to a plateau of G* in the range of 80-120

15

drop occurs in Fig. 7.

before the abrupt

EP

TE D

10

The crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich phase can store some latent heat,

17

influencing the actual temperature which bitumen/SBS/PE materials experience. The

18

specific heat capacity (c) for the liquid bitumen, SBS, PE are 1.34, ~2.0 and ~2.1

19

J/(g· ). Thus, the specific heat capacity of bitumen/SBS/PE (100/5/15) blends (cb)

20

can be calculated by the following arithmetic mean method [32]

21 22

AC C

16

cb = cbitumen × wbitumen + cSBS × wSBS + cHDPE × wHDPE

(1)

The cb value is calculated to be 1.46 J/(g· ) based on equation (1). As we know, the 18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

heat calculation formula satisfies the equation

2

Q=cm∆T

3

in which Q is the amount of heat, m indicates the mass of material and ∆T indicates

4

the temperature change. The unit of Q is Joule (J). Here in DSC measurement, the unit

5

of ∆Hm is J/g. Thus, the ∆T of bitumen/SBS/PE blends due to the melting process of

6

PE-rich phase can be calculated as

RI PT

(3)

M AN U

Combined the relevant data, the ∆T of original and annealed E15S5 samples due to

8 9

SC

∆T =∆H /cb

7

(2)

the melting heat are approximate 18

and 21 , respectively. Reminiscent of

10

frequency sweep result given in Fig. 3(d), the complex modulus of annealed E15S5 at

11

80

12

PE-rich phase. The overlapped phenomenon observed by rheological test occurs at the

13

temperature lower much than 20

14

DSC due to the different heating methods. The samples are stayed at one fixed

15

temperature for dozens of minutes during frequency sweep at each tested temperature,

16

but the heating rate is very fast with 15

17

heating history in annealed E15S5 makes the melting effect on rheological behavior

18

reveal in advance.

TE D

overlaps with each other should be attributed to the melting process of

EP

compared with the melting point measured by

/min for DSC measurement. The longer

AC C

19

and 100

At the same time, the G* dependence on the high temperature in the original E15S5

20

sample in Fig. 3(b) is also weakened due to the crystalline-to-amorphous transition of

21

PE-rich phase, but it does not show the overlapped result at 80

22

possible reason for this result is the different extent of phase separation for original 19

and 100 . A

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and annealed E15S5. The phase separation structure has not reached the final

2

thermodynamic equilibrium in original E15S5. Considering the original reason for

3

phase separation in polymer modified bitumen, there would be a diffusion of light

4

components diffusion between polymer chains and asphaltenes of bitumen at higher

5

tested

6

crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich phase on the actual rheological tested

7

temperature.

This

process

may

weaken

the

influence

of

SC

temperature.

RI PT

1

As for the annealed E15S5, the phase separation between polymer and bitumen has

9

completed to a further extent. Thus, the crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich

10

phase rather than materials diffusion plays an important role in the rheological test.

11

The temperature increase from equipment heating could be offset by the melting

12

process of PE-rich phase. That is the main reason for the apparently stable rheological

13

tested condition in the annealed E15S5 at 80-100

14

shown in Fig. 7. This different stable temperature range in Fig. 3(d) and Fig. 7 may be

15

caused by the different heating mode between dynamic frequency sweep and

16

temperature ramp test.

17

4 Conclusions

TE D

EP

shown in Fig. 3(d) or 80-120

AC C

18

M AN U

8

Based on the above discussion, both E15S5 and S15E5 proceed viscoelastic phase

19

separation in which the network structure is formed by PE-rich phase and SBS-rich

20

phase, respectively. However, the annealing treatment at 180

21

stronger influence on E15S5 rather than S15E5, regarding phase structure evolution

22

and rheological property. In S15E5 blend, the main characteristics of phase structure 20

for 60 min has a much

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT is the existence of SBS-rich network throughout the annealing process. At the same

2

time, PE-rich droplets tend to migrate into SBS-rich network gradually. As for E15S5,

3

phase structure is the PE-rich droplets encapsulated in the SBS-rich network at the

4

initial stage. As the annealing proceeds, PE-rich droplets assemble into network

5

structure while the SBS-rich phase is squeezed out to transform into droplets,

6

attaching the interface between PE-rich phase and bitumen-rich phase.

This obvious phase structure transition makes an improvement in G* and η* for

SC

7

RI PT

1

8

E15S5 blend. It is found that the G* and η* at 80

9

the annealed E15S5, revealing a remarkable stability under these temperatures. DSC

10

results shows a large amount of melting enthalpy of PE-rich phase in the annealed

11

E15S5, and this influences the actual temperature which bitumen/SBS/PE materials

12

experience. That is the main reason for the overlapped G* or η* of the annealed E15S5.

13

The disappearance of overlapped G* or η* at different temperatures in the original

14

E15S5 is related to the extent of phase separation. The competition between polymer

15

chains and asphaltenes to absorb the light components of bitumen may weaken the

16

effect of crystalline-to-amorphous transition of PE-rich phase on the actual

17

rheological tested temperature. This study provides an effective route to design an

18

energy storage bituminous material modified by immiscible polymer blend in which

19

crystalline polymer can generate amount of melting enthalpy.

20

Conflict of interest

21

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

22

Acknowledgements

are almost invariable for

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

and 100

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT We are grateful to the financial support from the National Natural Science

2

Foundation of China (51403026).

3

References

4

[1] G. D. Airey, Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified

5

road bitumens☆, Fuel 82 (2003) 1709-1719.

6

[2] J. Zhu, B. Birgisson, N. Kringos, Polymer modification of bitumen: Advances and

7

challenges, Eur. Polym. J. 54 (2014) 18-38.

8

[3] H. Fu, L. Xie, D. Dou, L. Li, M. Yu, S. Yao, Storage stability and compatibility of

9

asphalt binder modified by SBS graft copolymer, Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2007)

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

1528-1533.

11

[4] B. Sengoz, G. Isikyakar, Evaluation of the properties and microstructure of SBS

12

and EVA polymer modified bitumen, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) 1897-1905.

13

[5] M. Jasso, D. Bakos, J. Stastna, L. Zanzotto, Conventional asphalt modified by

14

physical mixtures of linear SBS and montmorillonite, Appl. Clay Sci. 70 (2012)

15

37-44.

16

[6] P. Wang, Z. Dong, Y. Tan, Z. Liu, Effect of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes on the

17

Performance of Styrene -butadiene-styrene Copolymer Modified Asphalt, Mater.

18

Struct. 50 (2017) 1-17.

19

[7] M. Liang, X. Xin, W. Fan, H. Wang, S. Ren, J. Shi, Effects of polymerized sulfur

20

on rheological properties, morphology and stability of SBS modified asphalt, Constr.

21

Build. Mater. 150 (2017) 860-871.

22

[8] S. S. Galooyak, B. Dabir, A. E. Nazarbeygi, A. Moeini, Rheological properties and

AC C

EP

TE D

10

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT storage stability of bitumen/SBS/montmorillonite composites, Constr. Build. Mater.

2

24 (2010) 300-307.

3

[9] T. Xia, L. Zhou, S. Lan, X. Huang, SBS modified bitumen in the presence of

4

hydrophilic or hydrophobic silica nanoparticles, Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (2017)

5

957-964.

6

[10] T. Xia, L. Zhou, J. Xu, Y. Qin, W. Chen, J. Dai, Rheology and thermal stability of

7

polymer modified bitumen with coexistence of amorphous phase and crystalline phase,

8

Constr. Build. Mater. 178 (2018) 272-279.

9

[11] A. Perezlepe, F. J. Martinezboza, P. Attane, C. Gallegos, Destabilization

10

mechanism of polyethylene-modified bitumen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 100 (2006)

11

260-267.

12

[12] A. H. Fawcett, T. Mcnally, G. M. Mcnally, F. Andrews, J. Clarke, Blends of

13

Bitumen with Polyethylenes, Polymer 40 (1999) 6337-6349.

14

[13] A. Perezlepe, F. J. Martinezboza, C. Gallegos, Influence of polymer

15

concentration on the microstructure and rheological properties of high-density

16

polyethylene (HDPE)-modified bitumen, Energ. Fuel. 19 (2005) 1148-1152.

17

[14] A. A. Yousefi, Polyethylene dispersions in bitumen: The effects of the polymer

18

structural parameters, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90 (2003) 3183-3190.

19

[15] A. Perezlepe, F. J. Martinezboza, C. Gallegos, O. Gonzalez, M. E. Munoz, A.

20

Santamaria, Influence of the processing conditions on the rheological behaviour of

21

polymer-modified bitumen, Fuel 82 (2003) 1339-1348.

22

[16] T. Xia, J. Xu, T. Huang, J. He, Y. Zhang, J. Guo, et al., Viscoelastic phase

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT behavior in SBS modified bitumen studied by morphology evolution and

2

viscoelasticity change, Constr. Build. Mater. 105 (2016) 589-594.

3

[17] H. Tanaka, Universality of Viscoelastic Phase Separation in Dynamically

4

Asymmetric Fluid Mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996 ) 787-790.

5

[18] J. Zhu, N. Kringos, Towards the development of a viscoelastic model for phase

6

separation in polymer-modified bitumen, Road Mater. Pavement 16 (2015) 39-49.

7

[19] W. Shi, F. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. C. Han, Viscoelastic Phase Separation and

8

Interface Assisted Crystallization in a Highly Immiscible iPP/PMMA Blend, ACS

9

Macro Letters 1 (2012) 1086-1089.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

[20] W. Shi, X.-M. Xie, C. C. Han, Frustrated Crystallization in the Coupled

11

Viscoelastic Phase Separation, Macromolecules 45 (2012) 8336-8346.

12

[21] Z. Feng, J. Yu, D. Kuang, The physical properties and photostability of bitumen

13

with different ultraviolet absorbers, Pet. Sci. Technol. 31 (2013) 113-120.

14

[22] L. Wu, J. Zhu, X. Liao, K. Ni, Q. Zhang, Z. An, et al., Effect of confinement on

15

glass dynamics and free volume in immiscible polystyrene/high-density polyethylene

16

blends, Polym. Int. 64 (2015) 892-899.

17

[23] L. Li, C. Miesch, P. Sudeep, A. C. Balazs, T. Emrick, T. P. Russell, et al.,

18

Kinetically trapped co-continuous polymer morphologies through intraphase gelation

19

of nanoparticles, Nano Lett. 11 (2011) 1997-2003.

20

[24] K. Stratford, R. Adhikari, I. Pagonabarraga, J. Desplat, M. Cates, Colloidal

21

jamming at interfaces : A route to fluid-bicontinuous gels, Science 309 (2005)

22

2198-2201.

AC C

EP

TE D

10

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [25] M. N. Lee, A. Mohraz, Bicontinuous Macroporous Materials from Bijel

2

Templates, Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) 4836-4841.

3

[26] L. Bai, J. W. Fruehwirth, X. Cheng, C. W. Macosko, Dynamics and rheology of

4

nonpolar bijels, Soft Matter 11 (2015) 5282-5293.

5

[27] H. Chung, K. Ohno, T. Fukuda, R. J. Composto, Self-regulated structures in

6

nanocomposites by directed nanoparticle assembly, Nano Lett. 5 (2005) 1878-1882.

7

[28] G. Polacco, J. Stastna, D. Biondi, F. Antonelli, Z. Vlachovicova, L. Zanzotto,

8

Rheology of asphalts modified with glycidylmethacrylate functionalized polymers, J.

9

Colloid Interf. Sci. 280 (2004) 366-373.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

[29] P. Partal, F. Martı´nez-Boza, C. G. B. Conde, Rheological characterisation of

11

synthetic binders and unmodified bitumens, Fuel 78 (1999) 1-10.

12

[30] M. Liang, P. Liang, W. Fan, C. Qian, X. Xin, J. Shi, et al., Thermo-rheological

13

behavior and compatibility of modified asphalt with various styrene-butadiene

14

structures in SBS copolymers, Mater. Des. 88 (2015) 177-185.

15

[31] T. Xia, Y. Huang, X. Jiang, Y. Lv, Q. Yang, G. Li, The Molecular Mechanism of

16

the Morphology Change in PS/PVME/Silica Blends Based on Rheology,

17

Macromolecules 46 (2013) 8323-8333.

18

[32] M. Karkri, M. Lachheb, Z. Nógellová, B. Boh, B. Sumiga, M. A. AlMaadeed, et

19

al., Thermal properties of phase-change materials based on high-densitypolyethylene

20

filled with micro-encapsulated paraffin wax for thermalenergy storage, Energ.

21

Buildings 88 (2015) 144-152.

AC C

EP

TE D

10

22 25