PIM 2ool airs industry's successes and challenges he 'PIM 2001' conference presented a global view of the technologies and markets of the rapidly growing powder injection moulding (PIM) industry. The conference was held in Orlando, FL, USA, from 28 February - 2 March 2001, organized by Innovative Material Solutions, Inc, and the Center for Innovative Sintered Products at Penn State University. The conference co-chairs were Professor Randall M. German of Penn State and Claus Joens of Elnik Systems (Cedar Grove, NJ, USA). More than 115 participated, representing 82 companies and 14 countries, with substantial attendance from Germany and Japan, an indication of the strength of the PlM industry in those countries. Thirty-two presentations covered available powders, feedstocks, binder systems, moulding machines, furnaces, and part producers' concerns.
T
Markets and technology An overview of the worldwide
PIM industry and its markets was provided by Robert Cornwall of Innovative Material Solutions. He related PIM manufacturing to the worldwide market for net shaped manufacturing, which e.,ceeds US$23 billion in North America and includes casting, some types of plastics moulding,
I oooo
I
|
%
,ooo
.
+oo 101985
!
1990
.
.
.
....... T"
i
1995
2000
Year
Figure t: Worldwide sales of PIM parts.
1.0
~I/~PR
Julqe
2001
!
2005
2010
[ ] Metal casting 5%
[ ] New company 14%
[ ] Metal cutting 8%
[ ] Thermoplastic moulding 27%
[ ] Traditional metal powder 8% [ ] Traditional ceramic 38% Figure 2: Origin of Europe's PIM companies (source Arburg GmbH).
powder metallurgy (PM), ceramic manufacturers and other netshape technologies. There are currently more than 500 companies practising the manufacture of metal, ceramic or both types of parts by injection moulding. This is up from 240 companies in 1997. Roughly 40 powder producers supply these 500 companies. There are 20 feedstock suppliers worldwide, though less than ten are major players. Global employment in the industry exceeds 6000. PlM sales were estimated to be worth more than $700 million in 2000, with annual growth at 22% per year (Figure 1). Nearly half of these sales are in the USA, followed by Europe (with a little more than a third) and the remainder in Asia. Ferrous materials account for nearly 60% of the total profits. Cornwall compared and contrasted high and low pressure moulding and discussed future trends. Consolidations will significantly impact the industry in the coming years. Other manufacturing technologies are taking a hard look at PIM and are either implementing it in their process or are improving their own processes to compete on cost and properties.
Marko Maetzig of Arburg G m b H (Lossburg, Germany) discussed the status of PIM markets and technologies in Europe. He indicated that there are 120 companies and 30 research institutes working in the technology operating nearly 250 moulding machines, 98% of which have a clamping force of less than 100 tons. Maetzig estimated the total usage of feedstock in Europe to be more than 1100 tons. In discussing the origin of Europe's PIM companies, he reported that 38% come from a traditional ceramics background, 27% from thermoplastic moulding, 8% apiece from traditional PM and metal cutting, 5% from metal casting, with new companies making up the remaining 14% (Figure 2). Terauchi Shyuntaro, the Chair of the Japan Injection Moulding Association (JIMA) and president of Osaka Yakin Kogyo (Osaka), gave a detailed analysis of the MIM market in Japan. He indicated that there are some 20 companies in Japan making MIM parts, with sales of approximately $90 million and an annualized growth of 15%. Eleven companies share 90% of the market, with Injex Corp and Citizen Watch
oo26-o657/ot/$ - see front matter © 2ooi Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
the
dominant
two-thirds
players.
of the
Around
parts
produced
are made from stainless other
ferrous
Applications end-use last
are
areas
few
steels
materials
growing
(Table
years
3).
in all
End-use sector
1); in the
growth
particularly
and
(Figure
strong
has
been
in
the
Telecommunication Electronic application
telecommunications and automotive sectors, Shyuntaro said, while
in
watch
and
percentage
sectors
are declining
importance. details
terms
sewing
part
somewhat
He
also
of the materials
developed
the
machine
by JIMA,
in
provided
Automotive
O-5
0.2
3.5
2.0
standards
Watch
J4.o
5.4
21.3
13.0
Sewing machine
0.6
0.2
Other
8.7
3.45
a.5
Totat
100
38.5
100
and distrib-
uted a CI) of his presentation. Best
practices
examined
in
by
German.
Professor
He
cessful
PIM
Randall
indicated
companies
benchmarking
were
that
are
suc-
actively
themselves
evaluation,
citing
factors
net-shape
most
PIM
profitable
facturing
can
profits
from the point.
compares
personnel,
lectual
property,
image,
nology,
managed
at
companies
include: practices,
nozzle system.
to
PM manufacturing
business
markets
in MIM
were
Howells
of
(Neath,
UK).
inteldefined
modern
the
technology
talks,
market
and
Animesh
Processing,
(Materials Worth,
TX,
licensing
and the parameters
USA)
current
market
which
represents
total
for
that
it
powders
discussed
by Bob
Metal
He noted
Ltd
that
the
size is $450 million, about
PM,
for
and
significant
The total market
for MIM
powders
is a few hundred
toins per
in whilt
highly
are
alloyed
typically
powders.
discussed
the
atomized
powders,
scepticism
about
and
of gasexpressed
manufactur-
ers’ desire to go to coarser to
reduce
powder
costs.
prices
more Howells
advantages the
powders
Stainless
have
been
steel halved
over the last ten years and are now in
the
$7/lb
quantities.
In his
means of further to increase
range
for view,
tonnage the
price reductions
the volume
www.metal-powder.net
61.2
100
85.6
Fort
contamination
that when
of sales.
Therr
were
several
and
feedstock
hinders
Myers
cussed
best is
of Penn
optimum
water-atomized
Schofalvi
stanclof APEX LLC
discussed
hinders
low
for titani-
um and other reaction-sensitive alloys. The difficulty of working with fine Ti powders and the ease of use of the APEX hinder system
tive. Correct talks
on
systems. State
binder
ilis-
issues for
stainless
Their
producers’
OH)
high quality
and feedstocks
powders.
growth. year
6.4
using thermal extraction presented. The importance
Binders
Neal
10% of the
conventional is poised
7,s
Technologies,
(Cleveland,
MIM practice
for metal
Advanced
Bose
discussed
companies should consider licensing PIM technologies.
tech-
relationships
Osprey
5.4
OR) talked considerations
parts
Karl-Heinz
Concluding
and financials. The
l.1
sample parts including Tim McKahe of Kinetics
ultrafine powders produced using ;I specially designed high-pressure
manu-
4%. The best practices
showed titanium.
the
average
consider
theme, ATMIX
Inc (Wilsonville, about feedstock
with
at 10%. This
traditional
he
Also on the powders Koei Nakahayashi of
Carp (Tokyo, Japan) discussed the a‘lvantages of water-atomized
net-shape
method
L3
*InWmomillion
for
manufacturing
technologies.
x5-5
Source: Shyuntam Temuchi
mar-
ket as a comparative other
7.3 13.2
against
peers and using the financial performance
8.5
steel
semispherical
Ti powders
is impera-
selection
binders
and
debid
regimes
will
lead
were of
of powders, and to
sinter
a tensile
strength of 550 MPa (80 ksi), density of 99.2% and elongation of 8%. Oxygen
contents
of less than
4000 ppm can he achieved
at pre-
shape leads to lower tap density, difficulty in identifying critical solids loading and also feedstock separation. A high viscosity binder is required. Bob Petcavitch Polymer Technologies,
of Inc
Planet (San
Diego, CA) talked about the company’s water-soluble binder system. It is currently available in many metal powders, including iron-based anticorrosive
systems using additives.
special He
detailed ideal processing conditions and sample propertics, and
Stanless
steel 45.6%
q SKH.SKD 1.8%
Tungslen 7.7%
FeNi alloy 13.2%
0
Magnetic material 6.2%
Pure iron 7.9%
q Titanium
2.8%
Figure 3: Usage of different MIM materials based on value of sales (after Shyuntaro).
MPR
Hardmetal
1.4%
Others 13.3%
in Japan for lggg,
June
2001
11
design iiiinimi:es temperature vandons in the furnace, assuriiir: con-
atic 1 the tliw rates of the \;aric>us compc)nents of the feedstc>ck. The
sistent part quality. cd Elnik’s offshoot
iii~)clel then predicts sintering hehaviour had on part gec>metr\; aid drnsity variations.
Techncdogies NJ) cc)vered
Bryan Sherman cc)mpany IXH
LLC: ((:cilar ~~ptimizing
pai-;lmaers &ring tci- in ;I hatch
Grc)\,e, prc)ctw
&hind ad sinfurn;lcv. When
&hiding
in s~ich furtwce~,
specinl
;ittentic)n
slx~~ilil
to p;u-t
he
piid
sllppcrrt, ~qXimizec1 temperature conttc)l nnil ;itmtq+wes, he said.
Parts makers perspective Parts manufacturers
had new intcjr-
inati
ity machines, iiaccs
and
nine &hiding
ten
sintering
The i~~lllp;lny 11x. ;IlX,Llt $12 millrc)n Mawtds incldc les., steel, Fe-Co,
fur-
furnaces. s&5 of month.
px-t
pet-
W ,dloys, stainTi and <)thers.
Injex Ll‘ies;i 64-cavity moulil for one part geometry ;ind utilizes robots t<) parts from the ~ntdJ.
remove
Ratnesh
D\vividi
(Cc)nccdville, new
process
pr)rous
metals
via
gas
metals
injectic>ti.
;lre m;mufac-
via ;i patcnttd 100 microns
pr<‘cess with
thermal
noise
reiiuction high A
weight
in
reduc-
dampening(,
in expensive
cost
materials,
seals, xx1 high
temperature
stiffiiess
The,;
;q~plicatic)ns
insulati<~n,
tion,
of less
diamettzr.
potend
have
a
micri)-
fine, r~~unde~l unif~>rm p)res than
Inc
discussed
of prcducin::
Micrcprrcw, turd
of Southco
P,4)
components.
manufacture
of
setters
for
PIM LIXS ceramic mcdling technology to produce its products. David
Bacchi
of Blasch
Precision
Ceramics (Albany, NY) discussecl the co~npa~q’s technolog\: and sh~~\ved examples rials
Modelling
to pcwder
David
iliscus5eil
Yoon of liestner Inc (Korea) offered his opinion on ho\v computer-aidei engineering can This
enhmce qppro;d~
the
I’IM procrss. can reduce the
costs aid clelavs of trial and error mcdilin~, and is usd extensively in the plastics industry. These
Metal
modding
u-as
Ron Carlson of Products (Lind-
Strom, MN). He said the driving force for plastic mcdlers to m~we tcj PIM is higher profit m;qqins. Plastic moulders need to consider many field.
aspects hefore entering the It often takes a while tc>
uderstand the complexity of the PIM process and it is easy to
plastics models have been incdifiecl for PIM with additic)ns to cover the sinterinfi process. Bestner stresses its software’s ahil-
necessary
ity tcl predict density basecl on mo111J-flow
cd
variations moilelling
of going frc)m plastic
injection hy
Smith
of how its mate-
utderestimate to reach
Start-up
costs
by Dennis
the investment profitability.
were
also consid-
Walker
of Reta)
www.metal-powder.net
Tool Company (Dallas, TX) in his discussion of the benefits of lo\\
chemical irdicated
that new customa-s (Jften
binder system, lding ad wmpounding all have significant im-
pressure moulding. The cost:, of start-up are 2
Jo nc)t have cc)nfidence in the technology and neeil to he won over
pact on final magnetic properties. In summary, this was an impor-
lower ma j oi-
ad od flow industry. He
advantage of this technology, together with the ability tc, mould
through constant Cc~~nmU~~ic;lt~~~~tant conference and education and through undermany technical
small as \vrll as larger metal and
standing
ceramic parts, and the use of lessexpensive tooling. duminium
AMT pays particular attenticw to the process and is al\vays striving for
Retco
greater than 08% yield, he s;d.
specializes
in wear applica-
tions and sees growth in ultra and nano-graincd Stephen
tungsten
carhidcs.
the
Barry
customers
Rabin
(Idaho
on the
market.
Magnequench
perspecti\.e on the manufacture
polvder producer
of O&t)
O-pmof
orthodontic
brackets hy MIM. The
ders and
orthodontic
market is a $600 mil-
NdFeB,
honded
took place with so many people
producer
SruG>, ferrite ad
a
powof
Alnic~~
lii)n industry ~vorldwide. Originall\
magnets.
produceJ
priw of powder has dropped sig-
by investment
MlM brackets
are catching
the orthodontic to success
casting, on in
iniiustry. Critical
are ~ii~dd
design
Technologies discussed his Jevelopment instrumental
nificantly billion
and
market, Materials
PTE Ltd (Singapcw) company ad c)f ;I 50/50 control
reported
that
while magnetic
mance has increased.
part handling. K.L. Lim of Advanced
He
ilollar
the
perfor-
In the $5.4
permanent
valve for the
injectic>n modding
is on
the rise. For many magnet
appli-
ani 1 no sintering. Various prc’cessin:: parameters including rhenlogy, moisture,
density,
the
worldwide
PIM
in one location.
Contact: Robert Cornwall
Innovative Material Solutions, 225 Canterbury Drive, State College, PA 16803, USA. Tel: +1-814-867-1140; Fax: +1-814-867-2813. E-mail:
[email protected]; URL: www.imspowder.com
Inc
n
magnet
cations there IS no hinder removal
the NiFe
in
industry gathered
m;rgnet is both
of NdFeB
;I magnet
ben-
efit of the meeting was the inforthat mal ‘hall~vay’ discussions active
Fulls, ID) offered his per-
spective
Huti
covered business
related topics. An important
Ilf?CdS.
of Magnequcnch
izers (San Marcos, CA) offered his
that and
particle
The PIM 2002 conference will take place 18-20 March 2002 in San Diego, CA at the US Grant Hotel. A call for papers is available on the website www.imspowder.com.
size,
SINTERHARDENING in continuous furnaces:
l
l l
Best quality:
l
l
High efficiency:
l
l
Environmental friendly:
MAHLER GmbH Industrial Phone:
l l
automatic carbon potential control high cooling speed automatic gas flow control in the furnace (MAHLER-patent) computer control of the sintering parameters high reproducibility incorporated protective gas generation high capacity with small furnace dimensions rapid burn off low energy consumption
Furnaces
- ZeppelinstraOe
+ 49-7 11-93 92 02 12 - Fax: + 49-7 11-3 18 05 13
- 73730 Esslingen/Germany - eMail:
[email protected] - http://www.mahlerofen.de
122
New Reader Enquiry Service No 606. Go to www.metal-powder.net www.metal-powder.net
to make your enquiry.
MPR June 2001
13