Pressure dependence of the lattice frequencies of anthracene and naphthalene

Pressure dependence of the lattice frequencies of anthracene and naphthalene

Volume 22. number 3 CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS IS October 1973 PRESSURE DEPENDENCE OF THE LATTICE FREQUENCIES OF ANTHRACENE AND NAPHTHALENE” S.S.M...

297KB Sizes 0 Downloads 28 Views

Volume

22. number 3

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

IS October

1973

PRESSURE DEPENDENCE OF THE LATTICE FREQUENCIES OF ANTHRACENE AND NAPHTHALENE”

S.S.MITR4 ‘Department

of Electrical

Engineering,

Kirrgston, Rhode

Univcrrity

Island 02881,

of Rhode

Island,

USA

0. BRAFMAN, M. HAYEK Physics Department,

Technion,

Haifa, Israel

and W.B. DANIELS+

and R.K. CRAWFORD*

Solid Spate and hlateriak Laboratory, Princeton Princeton, New Jersey 08.540, USA

University.

Received 25 June 1973

The pressure dependence of the Raman lattice modes of anthracenc and naphthalene molecular crystals has been studied in the range O-10 kbar, using hydrostatic pressure and laser excitation. Criineisen parameters in the range 3-6 have been observed. Calculations SC the elastic wnstants and the prcssurc dependence of the lattice frqucncizs have been carried out using an intermolecular potential of the atom-atom type, with parameters derived from other crystalline properties. Agrecmcnt with experimental data is good.

The temperature variation of the vibrational frequencies of crystal lattices involves a mixed dependence on both temperature and volume, whereas the effects of pressure involve the volume dependence only (to a good fast approximation), and allow a useful separation of the two dependences [l]. We report here a study of the pressure dependence of the Raman-active lattice vibrations of the molecular crystals anthracene and naphthalene, and the results of a

* Work supported by grants from the Army Research Office (Durham). + Present address: Physics Department, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware 19711, USA. + Present address: Physics Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, Itlinois 61803, USA.

calculation of these frequencies and of the eIastic constants. We used a form of the intermolecular porenziat which has proved useful elsewhere for molecular crystals. Studies such as this are 2 new direction for molecular crystals, though some results on intramolecular frequencies at high pressure have appeared. We expect that pressure-dependence studies will play a valuable role in the molecular crystal field in the future. The experimental methods have been&described elsewhere [2]. Crystals cf anthracene and naphthalene were subjected to hydrostatic pressure up ta 10 kbar, and the Raman spectra were excited by a KeNe laser (50 .rnW at 6328 A). The crystals \vere oriented, and the spectra partially polarized, but the experimental conditions made polarization data unreliable. Polarized spectra are also taken at one atmosphere

Vollrmo 22, num!Ta- 3

CHPhfICAL

PHYSICS

LETiERS

1.5

Clcrobcr 1973

The elastic constants of anchracene [lo] and nnphthalene

[ 1 I] have been

measured

by acomtic

methods.

We have calculated the dispersion curves using the methods of Bouadeo and Taddei [12] znd from the limiting slopes of the acoustic frequency versus !vave vector have obtained the sound velocities. ‘HE sound velocities and dispersion curves obtained here are in reasonable agreement with those obtained by PawIey [8], allowing for the differences in potentiai ener_q parameters used. The elastic constants, derived directly from the velocities, will not be compared with errperiment since a certain amount of arbitrariness is involved in deriving the non-major constants from the velocities. Sufficient indication of the agreement with the direct experimental sound velocities is shown in table 2. Instead of maintaining a purely theoretical approach and using cur derived elastic constants to compute the effect of pressure on structure, we have chosen to use the constants taken from experiment [IO, 1 I]. A pressure is assumed (1000-2000 atmospheres) and the strains calculated. The compressions did not agee very closely with the pressure-voIume data [4], but any attempts to scale the calculations I 6.400

L

1

6375

63M

6335

6400

6375

6350

6335

xi

hi

Fig. 3. Pressure dependence of anthracene lattice Raman spectra. (a) c(bc)b polarization, (b) c(ac)b polarization. Due to scattering in the sample polarizatjon data ax not quantitative.

would

not

eters

derived.

I

1

53

loo

‘A’AVENUMEER

of the naphthalene

of the Griineisen

With the compressed

u4t

pnrzrn-

cell param-

were again calculzted~

and values of ^li obtained. The values of ri, calculated and observed, are given in table 3 for anthracene: and the agreement shown there is reasonable cause to accept the model potential as representing the intermo-

I

Fig. 4. Temperature dependence

the values

eters, the lattice frequencies

0

STOKES

affect

SHIFT

I

1.50 FROM

X5145

lattice Raman spectrum.

-

77”K, ---29°F:.

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LE’MERS

Volume 22, number 3

Lattice frequencies and calculated

Table 1 of naphthalene and anthraccne,

Anthracene

Naphthalene “talc

“OIJS=)

%x.lc

106 19 52

121 70 39

120 76 40

125 71

101 73

125 65

109 67

46

47

45

49

102 49

97 50

101 44

101

55

65

60

62

YObS

a)

‘%

-%I

hl

observed

39

Yobs

Tabs

*rcalc

A8

109 74 51

3.1 4.9 6.2

3.2 4.1 5.1

%

125 71 46

3.6 5.0 6.3

3.1 4.7 5.4

frequencies.

Also, the elastic con-

vobsa)

“talc

“obs b,

“talc

only arise from

the close-range

,100

2.81

2.54

2.64

2.47

sions,

are an important

010

1.59

1.77

1.79

atom potential at distances lar contacts in crystals.

004

l.32

1.58

1.91 (1.94) 1.34

010

3.32

2.72

2.79

001 100

1.15 1.75

1.09 1.96

2.95 (2.93) 1.65 1.96

001

7.75

3.80

3.82

100

1.35

1.4:

010

1.39

1.53

3.35 (3.36) 1.07 (1.16) 1.71 (1.71)

Table 2 (in IO5 cm/set)

and naphthdene

Propagation

Displacemenr

100

at

observed

and calculated

for

298°K

Anthracenc

Naphthalene

(2.62)

a) Ref. [9]. b) Ref. [ 141; in parenthcscs

allowing

the orientations

end these

intermolecular feature

corresponding

repul-

of the atomto molecu-

1.45

References 1.51 2.23

1.25 2.10

ref. [IO].

lecular situation adequately. We must note that the calculation whose results are presented here did not include.all possible refmements. For example, the moleci&r orientations may change on compression; we have tried

Table 3 ri= -d log vi/d log V, for anthracene

sound velocities as a function of pressure (density) and have found these changes to be predicted. The results quoted above in table 3 are thus not to be taken as the best that theory can do; they are, however, representative of the results obtained with various reasonable variations on the calculations. The values of the Griineisen parameters, averaging about 5, are higher than those typically obtained for ionic crystals, and the implication is that a very distance-xnsitive potential is associated with the frequencies being observed. Such a steep potential can

Sound velocities

001

1973

stants may depend on pressure; we have calculated

data (Ag, Bg) from this work and ref. (2). Infrared (A,, 6,) from ref. [ 13).

010

Griineisen parameters,

in the calculated

a) Raman

anthracene

15 October

to relax to equi-

librium.* at the new density and’have found changes

[ 1) S.S. hfitra,

C. Potius

and J.R.

Ferraro,

Phys

Rev.

Letters 18 (1967) 455. [2] 0. Rrafman, S.S. Mitra, R.K. Crawford, W.B. Daniels, C. Postmus and R.J. Ferraro, Solid State Commun. 7 (1969) 449. [3] M. Suzuki, T. Yokoyama and M. Ito, Spectrochirn. Acta 24A (1968) 1091. [4] S.N. Vaidya and G.C. Kennedy, J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1971) 987. [S] G. Taddei, H. Bonndeo, M.P. Marzocchi and S. Califqo, J. Chem. Phys. 58 (1973) 966. 161 D.E. Williams, J. Chem. Phys. 47 (1967) 4680.

* Using the computer program PACK3, kin’dly provided by D.E. YQlliams, wiih the same intermolecular potential used in the lattice frequency calculatinnr

:

Volume 22, number 3 [7] D.W.J. Cruickshank,

CHEMICAL

Acta Cryst. 10 (1957) 504; 9

(1956) 915. [8) G.S. Pawlcy, Phys. Stat. Sol 20 (1967) 347. [9] P. Weulsrsse. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) B264 (1967) 327. [lo] T. Danno and H. !nokucbi, Bull. Chem. Sot. Japan 41 (1968) 1783.

PHYSICS LE-RS

1s October 1973

[ 111 G.K. Afanas’eva, KristaUoyafiya

12 (1968: IO24 [English transl. Soviet Phys. Cryst. 13 (1969) 5921.

[ 121 H. Bonadeo and G. Taddei, J. Chem. Phys. 58 (1973) 979. [ 13) S.S. Micra, Bull. Am. Phys. Sot. 12 (1967) 79. [ 141 V.F. Tcslenko, Soviet Phys. Cryst. 12 (1960) 946.