Interrtafional
PYROLYSIS
J.
Publishing Company,
MASS
SPECTROMETRIC
HAVERKAMPl,
G. WIETENl
Amsterdam
STUDIES
and D-G.
Institute
of Public
- Printed in The Netherlands
ON MYCOBACTERIA
GROOTHUIS*
lFOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Amsterdam (The Netherlands) 2National
67
and Ion Physics, 47 (1983) 67--70
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Elsevier Scientific
Health
Physics,
(RIV),
Kruislaan
Bilthoven
407,
1098 SJ
(The Netherlands)
ABSTRACT Application of Curie point pyrolysis-quadrupole mass spectrometry together with pattern recognition methods for spectrum evaluation of-Fe-;-s the possibility for rapid characterization of complete bacterial cells. The spectral fingerprints obtained from mycobacteria are used for identification of Tuberculosis complex strains and for quality control of M.leptrae prepared from .ivzwiuo cultures. Pyrolysis-collisionally activated dissociation-MS can be used for structure elucidation of specific pyrolysis fragments. INTRODUCTION Complex
and macromolecular
dily be characterized thermally mixture
fragmented of largely
characteristic Curie
point
riety
of
(usually
in use in routine
Some
data
MATERIALS
obtained
isolated
specific) and
samples.
microbiological laboratories.
of the spectral
to common
practice
the field
Py-MS
procedures
on unweighted,
that
va-
are normally of
classification will
studies.
Py-MS
by computer
weighted,
of mycobacteriology
can be
for a great
advantage
for evaluation
is routine
classification,
substituting
A special
a
profiling
testing,
in conventional
can be based
within
data
on our
and immunological
tool, test
of which
chemical
viz. heterogeneity
are
yielding
projects
microbiology,
In
epidemiological
as an all-round
research
integral
can rea-
is
techni-
and identi-
or "key"
features.
be described
below.
AND METHODS
M.tube&c&u&&, were
may be used
analysis
applications
strains,
the composition
One of the main is the
cells
Molecules
(Py-MS).
in the MS-vacuum
molecules,
1).
system
of purposes,
accessibility
In analogy
fication,
EIMS
of unknown
the method
ques.
fragment (ref.
like bacterial
spectrometry conditions
of microbiological
for a variety
Thus,
materials
controlled
volatile
Py-quadrupole
identification
the easy
under
for the sample
("fingerprinting") applied
organic
by pyrolysis-mass
from
iM.buv-in,
M.buvti
from our
RIV culture
armadillo
liver were
of the UNDP/World
Bank/WHO
OOZO-7381/83/0000-0000/$03.00
through
0
BCG and other collection obtained
("atypical")
(ref. 2). from
Dr. P. Draper,
1983 Elsevier Scientific
Samples
the IMMLEP
mycobacteria of M.Rephae.
Steering
Natl.Inst.Med.Res., Publishing Company
Committee Mill
Hill,
London.
Samples
phosphate
were
buffer
quadruplicate.
without
are: Pyrolysis
any further
time
16-170;
see
carrier rate
pretreatment.
ref.
Fe/Ni
1 s; MS-inlet scan
out of a suspension
of the Py-MS
data analysis sample
heating
range m/z
onto the Py-wires
For a description
for multivariate total
applied
Each strain
system
(Curie
point
15O'C;
10 scans/s;
instrumental
51O'C);
temp.
EI electron
total
or
analyzed
in
and the computer
1-4. Typical
temp.
was
in water
scanning
conditions
rise time 0.1 s;
energy
time
methods
14 eV; mass
15 s (signal
averag-
ing).
IDENTIFICATION
OF CLINICALLY
Identification
RELEVANT
of mycobacterial
10s is compl ex (M .tub~ticuLuhih species
can
selected were
readily
"key" mass
a high
ratio
and long-term
stability
spectra
is derived
from
Extensive 59,
selection
cal series
order
of the spectral ference
to assign
a peak
ions which TBC
among which
cell wall
also
enable
complex found
set of empirically
The selection
the
criteria variance groups
reduced
TBC-complex
(6 peak)
spectrum
which
strains. set of key peaks:
strains
analyzed
identified
to conventional
m/z 50,
by this
proce-.
as atypical)
strain
typing).
and
A typi-
1 in the form of a non-linear space
for a set of unknown
like
elucidation the main
components cytosols observed
but
map
and re-
components
strains
to identify origin
as expressed
C2H-J);) interpreted It should
arabino-galactan. components
spectra. mainly
The
in the cell-wall-derived
as derived be noted
spectra
Py-CADMS
spectra.
spectra.
different
of cell wall
carbohydrate
Recent-
of the differences
can contribute
Py-CADMS
the neutral
cell.
contributing
by the key mass
a Py-fragment
each
it is difficult
of the bacterial
key mass m/z 59 represents
also cytosol
in whole-cell
that in general
Consequently,
of the molecular
(probably
represent
fragments.
(most likely
cell wall
is such
(ref. 5) of key peaks
and atypical that
of bacteria
chemical
M+' of acetamide
ty of key masses was
"atypical"
TBC and atypical
in a best
in Fig.
spectra
study
and an EI-fragment
carbohydrates
bacterial
mean
(i.e. a TBC strain
(pyrolysis)
to specific
a Py-CADMS
might
it was
glycan)
spectra.
between
200 mycobacterial
in the 6-feature
of Py-mass
up of several
ly we started
Thus,
or to other
variance/intra-strain
reference
(all relative
the tubercu-
strains.
is made
between
BCG)
used to compare
resulted
is represented
differences
The complexity peak
selected
errors
errors
of analyses
was
a hypothetical
studies
116. About
gave 0% first-order
7.6% second
with
a set of nine
peak
inter-strain
of variance
to either
of a small
Py-mass
of the discrimination
strains
71, 81, 98 and
dure
intensity
analysis
of unknown
as belonging
out on the basis
in the complex
of peak
(ref. 2). One way
strains
M.bovd and M.bov&
,
be carried peaks
MYCOBACTERIA
ions peptidofrom neutral
that
not only
to the intensi-
of m/z 59 of mycoEI-fragment
that
69
6 key features-
m/z
Non
50,59,71,8i,96,116
Linear
Map
:5.2)
(stress
Fig. I. Non-linear map of Py-mass spectra of a set of mycobacterial strains. Replicate spectral points are connected; distances between points represent spectral differences. Shaded strains are M.~:ub~c~u~~ D , M.bovi~ •lland M.buu& BCG q references. Unnamed strains belong to the TBC complex, named strains represent atypicals and are remote from the TBC complex. The M.uvim strain (bottom right) was correctly typed as atypical.
CHARACTERIZATION M.Pephac of infected and includes (toxic)
OF MYCOBACTERIUM
LEPRAE
can only be cultured
in uiwu
armadillos_ enzyme
chemicals
the final
on the basis
have
about medical
of traces
A-G which
and washing
procedure
MES and Percoll
the presence
peaks,
possible
are final
due to omission TWEEN
In
products samples
contaminants
studies
be detected.
This
compound
is
by Py-MS
absent
Fig. 2 shows
in the
a plot
the PEG concentration.
purification
respectively,
in
of M.Xcptiac.
procedure
J and K, and H and I, PEG levels
or inefficacy, C&I
undesired
can be introduced
89 (almost
components).
tissues
is complicated
be performed
e.g. m/z
of an extensive
from
by which
of such
and immunological
of PEG can rapidly
fragment
in bulk
steps
of m/z 89 in M.&epfiae preparationsvetiita
very low PEG levels. Analogously,
obtained
and purification
HEPES,
of pure M.Cept~ae and other
ceptable, step.
Knowledge
of characteristic
of the intensity Samples
PEG, TWEEN,
detection
and was
extraction
in bacteriological,
Semiquantitative
spectrum
like
preparations.
prerequisite
isolation
The
treatment,
PREPARATIONS
and
are unac-
of the final washing is structurally
related
70
l.O-
O.B-
0.6 i
L
ABCDEFGHIJK M. leprae BATCHES
2b 4b 6b Concentr. PEG (ppm)
Fig. 2. Concentration of PEG in M.Lcp&ae preparations; l represent standard contaminated with PEG), o represamples (from one M.&qzzae batch, deliberately sent M.Rcpaae batches to be tested.
to PEG but
can be differentiated
sib 1 e Percoll ker peaks
and MES contaminations
in the Py-mass
can also be applied pur fied M.&~&W cat
ve of changes
M.Rep~e
by specific
spectra.
in the study
preparations.
signals
can also be detected
Apart
from
of biological
detection
complex
contributions
were
units.
on the basis
of these
heterogeneity
In view of this,
in cell wall/cytosoT
of its polyol
Pos-
of mar-
artifacts
Py-MS
of extensively
dissimilarities observed
among
indisome
preparations.
REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5
H.L.C. Meuzelaar, J. Haverkamp and F.D. Hileman (Eds.), Pyrolysis Mass Spectrometry of Recent and Fossil Biomaterials; Compendium and Atlas, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1982. G. Wieten, J, Haverkamp, H.W.B. Engel and L.G. Berwald, Rev.Infect.Diseases, 2 (1981) 871-877. J. Haverkamp and P.G. Kistemaker, this Volume. L.G. Berwald, D.G. Groothuis and P. Draper, Ann. G. Wieten, J. Haverkamp, Microbial. 1338 (1982) 15-27. G.J. Louter, P.F.M. Stalmeier, A.J.H. Boerboom, J. Haverkamp and J. Kistemaker, Z.Naturforsch. 35C (1980) 6-11.