Retraction notice to Sophocarpine displays anti-inflammatory effect via inhibiting TLR4 and TLR4 downstream pathways on LPS-induced mastitis in the mammary gland of mice' International Immunopharmacology 35 (2016) 111–118
Retraction notice to Sophocarpine displays anti-inflammatory effect via inhibiting TLR4 and TLR4 downstream pathways on LPS-induced mastitis in the mammary gland of mice' International Immunopharmacology 35 (2016) 111–118
International Immunopharmacology 50 (2017) 370
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Immunopharmacology journal homepage: www.else...
International Immunopharmacology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/intimp
Retraction notice to Sophocarpine displays anti-inflammatory effect via inhibiting TLR4 and TLR4 downstream pathways on LPS-induced mastitis in the mammary gland of mice' International Immunopharmacology 35 (2016) 111–118
MARK
Dehai Wang, Niannian Xu, Zhenbiao Zhang, Shijin Yang, Changwei Qiu, Chengye Li, Ganzhen Deng, Mengyao Guo College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People's Republic of China
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/ article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editors. Following publication the journal was made aware by the authors that the wrong actin controls for an immunoblot in figure 5C were used. The reason for this error has not been explained. In subsequent correspondence, it became clear that the allegedly corrected actin controls
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2016.03.026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2017.07.008
1567-5769/
were not materially different than in the incorrect figure. During this review additional errors emerged, as well as, omissions. Thus, on the yaxis of the graph the bit wording of '(cell)' does not belong and should be deleted. Further, there are errors in the units for sophocarpine, which are written as mg/kg and is suggested should be microg/ml. This error appears to be also found within the text of the article.