Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CJChE
Review
Review on application of nanoparticles for EOR purposes: A critical review of the opportunities and challenges Yousef Kazemzadeh 1, Sanaz Shojaei 2, Masoud Riazi 2,3,⁎, Mohammad Sharifi 1 1 2 3
Department of Petroleum Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran Polytechnic, Tehran, Iran Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR/EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran Petroleum Engineering Department, School of Chemical and Petroleum Eng., Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 7 April 2018 Received in revised form 26 May 2018 Accepted 28 May 2018 Available online 21 June 2018 Keywords: Enhance oil recovery Nanofluid injection Nanoparticle Interfacial tension Wettability alteration Pore blockage
a b s t r a c t Nanoparticles have already gained attentions for their countless potential applications in enhanced oil recovery. Nano-sized particles would help to recover trapped oil by several mechanisms including interfacial tension reduction, impulsive emulsion formation and wettability alteration of porous media. The presence of dispersed nanoparticles in injected fluids would enhance the recovery process through their movement towards oil– water interface. This would cause the interfacial tension to be reduced. In this research, the effects of different types of nanoparticles and different nanoparticle concentrations on EOR processes were investigated. Different flooding experiments were investigated to reveal enhancing oil recovery mechanisms. The results showed that nanoparticles have the ability to reduce the IFT as well as contact angle, making the solid surface to more water wet. As nanoparticle concentration increases more trapped oil was produced mainly due to wettability alteration to water wet and IFT reduction. However, pore blockage was also observed due to adsorption of nanoparticles, a phenomenon which caused the injection pressure to increase. Nonetheless, such higher injection pressure could displace some trapped oil in the small pore channels out of the model. The investigated results gave a clear indication that the EOR potential of nanoparticle fluid is significant. © 2018 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
wettability alteration [31–35]. Nanoparticles possess unique properties which can be used to obtain desirable features. These properties are high specific area, special chemical reactivity and having active surfaces [36–40]. It is proved that nanoparticles can significantly increase oil production by means of:
In-situ oil production and recovery with primary and secondary methods have resulted in weak and unstable conditions, hence, efficient technologies such as nanotechnology for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) of oil reservoirs have recently attracted much attentions [1–7]. On average, about one-third of the initial in-situ oil can be produced by primary and secondary methods. The remaining part of oil is trapped in a reservoir rock and left behind due to surface and interface tensions [8–14]. This trapped oil can be pulled out by reducing the capillary forces which prevent oil movement through small pores of the reservoir [15–19]. Nanotechnology proposes a unique approach in controlling the oil recovery process [20–23]. The nano factor can enhance oil recovery by improving the geomechanism of reservoir which is obtained by improvement in surface tension and the spontaneous modification of oil reservoirs [24–30]. The capillary force is the required force for compressing small droplets of hydrocarbons in the pore throat of reservoirs which is reduced by the decline in water–oil interface tension and
• • • • • • • • • •
⁎ Corresponding author at: Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR/EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. E-mail address:
[email protected] (M. Riazi).
One of the challenges in nanoflooding is stability of nanofluid. Stability of nanoparticles in different fluids is determined by integrating the attraction and repulsion forces of nanoparticle surfaces. If the repulsion
Improving quality of the injecting fluid Viscosity alteration of the injecting fluid Density alteration of the injecting fluid Diminishing the surface tension Improving the emulsion formation Improving the conductivity and specific heat Improving the interactions between rock and oil Wettability alteration Altering the heat transfer coefficient Diminishing the formation damage by reducing released particles on pore surfaces [41–49].
2. Stability of Nanofluids
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.05.022 1004-9541/© 2018 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.
238
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
force becomes greater, the suspension gets stable and there will be no nanoparticle agglomeration [50–52]. • Zeta potential and charge density are two parameters that can be manipulated to form a stable suspension of nanoparticles. That is by an increase in zeta potential regardless of its sign (i.e. its absolute value), the stability and suspension of nanoparticles in fluid increase due to an increase in electrostatic repulsion force between the particles. Increasing zeta potential, however, intensifies the ionic power of the solution. The surface charge density of particles increases and results in higher attraction forces between particles and existing ions. This will diminish or eliminate stability of nanoparticles. The stability is therefore provided through the manipulation of the zeta potential and particle charge density. In fact, zeta potential is the representation for salinity, alkalinity, ion type and its concentration, which can be adjusted to form or improve stability in nanoparticles [53]. One of the ways to improve zeta potential and charge density parameters is pH alteration and adjustment. The surface charge load of the existing particles allows them to be stable in acidic, basic or neutral systems. If the particles are negatively charged (e.g. silica particle), stability increases by reducing solution pH. This is due to the electrostatic adsorption of hydronium ions towards silica particles which repulses these particles [53]. The effects of salinity, temperature and formation lithology can be summarized as follows: o Salinity of the nanoparticle containing fluid is one of the important instability factors for different fluids in oil reservoirs. Oppositely charged particles have negative impacts on stability of nanoparticles in the carrier fluid [54]. o Temperature is another important factor in nanofluid stability. In fact, a direct relation between salinity and temperature of the carrier fluid existed with reactivity and agglomeration rate of the nanoparticles. Thermal stability is a parameter which depends on the fluid salinity and formation lithology [55]. o Formation lithology also adds some complications to nanoparticle stability. Similar to the presence of different ions in the formation water, nanoparticle agglomeration and their attraction towards rock reservoir are highly plausible if the reservoir rock is oppositely charged towards nanoparticles [56].
3. Oil Displacement Mechanisms by Nanofluids Generally, three different mechanisms have been proposed for nanofluids. 3.1. Disjoining pressure This pressure is the one which in fact resists the adhesion force of fluids towards the solid surface to separate the fluid. This actually is the pressure difference between the thin layer of fluid and the bulk of fluid. A wedge-like film is formed by nanoparticles at the interface of discontinuous fluid through this mechanism. Such mechanisms are formed due to energies including Brownian motion and electrostatic repulsion force between nanoparticles. Greater repulsion forces exist with smaller nanoparticles [59]. Moreover, this force is intensified by increasing nanoparticle concentration. Schematic view of this mechanism is illustrated in Fig. 1. Such an arrangement for nanoparticles exerts a greater pressure at the interface of two fluids. The greater forces will be at the interface with the increased number of particles in fluid. If such energy is applied at the interface, displacement occurs to reach the equilibrium. Like other colloidal systems, magnitude of disjoining pressure is affected by parameters including particle size, temperature, and salinity of carrier fluid and surface properties of the present phases [60]. The form of the meniscus height, in the presence and the absence of nanoparticles, is shown in Fig. 2. 3.2. Density difference In the ultra-small throats of pores, nanoparticles agglomerate at the entrance of throats due to the density difference between water and nanoparticles. The agglomeration allows the injecting fluid to flow towards adjacent pores and increases their pressure. This leads the oil in adjacent pores to move and be produced. Pressure is reduced by the displacement of the oil and results in gradual restoration of pore blockages. The nanoparticles can be displaced by the carrier fluid once more under this circumstance [59]. 3.3. Wettability alteration and interface tension
• Surface coating of nanoparticles by different functional groups to improve their surface properties is another method for enhancing nanofluid stability. Surface coating of nanoparticles not only improves the zeta potential but also can enhance stability in high-saline systems. For instance, surface of the silica can be altered by Ceylon. These functional groups thus can be used to stabilize nanofluids in high temperature and salinities [57]. By the movement of nanofluids in porous media, various mechanisms contribute in reducing the nanoparticle concentration in nanofluids. The most important factors involved in such phenomenon are the adhesion of nanoparticles to rock surfaces and blockage of different throats of the rock. The throats are blocked by two ways in rocks: o The solid particles cannot pass through pores if the pore diameters are smaller than their size. According to which nanoparticle diameter is usually smaller than pore diameter, occurrence of such phenomenon is of scarcity. o Rock pores can be blocked under mechanisms of agglomeration and bridge if the diameter of pores is bigger than nanoparticles. While the nanoparticle containing water moves through the pore throats of rocks, the smaller water droplets pass with higher speed and comfort and hence, nanoparticles accumulate at throats. Diameter of the pores is reduced and eventually blocked due to the placement of nanoparticles on surfaces. Agglomeration generally depends on nanoparticle concentration, flow rate and the diameter ratio of droplets to pores [58].
Flooding with nanofluids improves wettability and interface tension properties of the system. Furthermore, nanoparticles affect the density of the injecting fluid and the reservoir fluid. Silicone nanofluids are again usually used to obtain such mechanism. As it is mentioned earlier, these nanoparticles can possess different wettability. Alcohol is a proper solvent for neutral and hydrophobic nanoparticles while hydrophilic nanoparticles are properly suspended in aqueous environments. These hydrophilic nanoparticles are mainly used for enhanced oil recovery of oil reservoirs which are mostly oil-wet. The main production mechanism by using these nanoparticles is to alter wettability from oil-wet to neutral or water-wet and vice versa. Wettability alteration is accomplished by adsorbing nanoparticles with proper wettability on the rock surface [61–63]. 4. Factors Influencing the Process of Flooding with Nanoparticles Flooding process with nanoparticles is affected by various factors which requires a sensitivity analysis to effectively determine these factors. These factors can be mentioned as follows. 4.1. Property of nanoparticles 4.1.1. Nanoparticle concentration Nanoparticle concentration has a bilateral influence on nanofluid injection. From one side, an increase in nanoparticle concentration escalates the disjoining pressure and Brownian motion due to the
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
239
TiO2 NPs Fig. 1. Disjoining pressure gradient at oil–nanofluid interface.
influence of increased repulsion forces, and nanofluid efficiency for altering wettability is consequently enhanced. On the other hand, an increase in the concentration results in a decline in porosity and permeability of the reservoir rock due to the increased rate of nanoparticle deposition on the rock surfaces. 4.1.2. Nanoparticle size Disjoining pressure is also affected by the size of nanoparticles and their corresponding charge density. As it is mentioned earlier, the smaller the particle sizes are, the greater is the repulsion force and thus the higher is the disjoining pressure that exist between them. Particles however agglomerate with higher rates if the particles become ultra-small. 4.1.3. Nanoparticle wettability The arrangement of nanoparticles at the interface of oil and water is defined by their wettability. Wettability of the reservoir rock also alters by adsorbing these particles on rock surfaces. Wettability alteration in the surface of reservoir rock changes the resistances against fluid flow and thus alters the relative permeability of oil and water in the reservoir.
4.2. Nanofluid system 4.2.1. Salinity Generally, stability of nanoparticles decreases by increasing the salinity of the system. In fact, increase in salinity reduces the zeta potential and therefore results in agglomeration of colloidal particles. However, increasing the salinity by adding different ions doesn't prevent nanoparticles from moving, it significantly increases the deposition of nanoparticles on rock surfaces. 4.2.2. Temperature Reservoir temperature is much higher than the surface temperature. Each nanoparticle thus has to maintain its efficiency in the reservoir temperature to be applicable for injection in oil fields. By increasing the temperature, particles agglomerate due to the decline in zeta potential. In fact, stability of nanoparticles is diminished by increasing the temperature. Nevertheless, according to the results, performance of the nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery has improved in higher temperatures. This can be due to the decreased surface tension in higher temperatures as the result of decline in interactions of liquid molecules. 4.2.3. Injection rate Small water molecules move faster than suspended nanoparticles by increasing the injection speed and results in agglomeration of nanoparticles which blocks pores and reduces oil production. By increasing the injection rate, nanofluid efficiency is therefore diminished due to particle agglomeration and pore blockages and its resulting permeability decline.
With Nanoparticle
Without Nanoparticle
Fig. 2. Effect of disjoining pressure on form of the meniscus height in the wedge region [60].
4.3. Reservoir rock 4.3.1. Size of rock particles In fact, specific area of the porous media is related to the size of the reservoir rock. The specific area of the reservoir rock is decreased by increasing the size of rock particles in which nanoparticle deposition on the rock surfaces also diminishes.
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
4.3.2. Clay content The adsorption of nanoparticles is escalated by increasing the clay content. This is primarily due to which available specific area for nanoparticles is enhanced and more spots are available for nanoparticle to be deposited on.
5. Literature Review on Using Nanoparticles and Its Efficiency in Enhanced Oil Recovery 5.1. Influence of nanoparticles on wettability alteration Zhang et al. have compared the performance of nanoparticles made by the Illinois technology institute and the silicone nanoparticles, and proved that nanoparticles which are made by this institute have more effectively performed in increasing the production of the trapped oil and wettability alteration [64]. In another study by Ju and Fan [65] the wettability alteration of oil-wet sandstones has been evaluated by injecting hydrophilic nanoparticles of silica. Results including TEM images have confirmed the wettability alteration and the adsorption of nanoparticles on the rock surfaces [65]. Onyekonwu and Ogolo [66] have studied the ability of poly-silicone nanoparticles in wettability alteration and enhanced oil recovery. Solvents including water and ethanol have been used to suspend the nanoparticles. It was found that in water-wet cores, oil recovery in 3000 ppm concentration can be improved by using neutral and hydrophobic nanoparticles due to mechanisms of wettability alteration and interface tension reduction, while, the oil recovery was diminished by using hydrophilic nanoparticles simply due to enhanced core water-wet property [66]. Karimi et al. [67] also have utilized nanoparticles with zirconium oxide base to investigate the influences on enhanced oil recovery. They have concluded that these nanoparticles are capable of altering carbonate rock wettability from highly oil-wet to highly water-wet. Considerable amount of oil was produced through spontaneous experiments by using these nanofluids [67]. In a study by Giraldo et al. [68], the influence of nanofluids containing aluminum-oxide-base nanoparticles has been evaluated. They have revealed that these nanoparticles can considerably alter the wettability of highly oil-wet sandstones to water-wet. Efficiency of surfactants as wettability alternation additives also has been improved [68]. By conducting contact angle experiments in high temperature and pressure condition, Cao et al. [69] have concluded that the ionic liquids and the utilized nanofluids are efficient and stable for wettability alteration at high temperatures. Fig. 3 indicates the percentage of papers on wettability alteration compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017.
5.2. Influence of nanoparticles on reducing interface tension By using iron nanoparticles, Suleimanov et al. [70] have evaluated the application of the nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery. They have reported that systems containing both nanoparticles and surfactants can enhance oil recovery up to 35%. This is while in systems containing only surfactants, oil recovery was reported to be 17%. They have explained the increased oil production by relating it to the reduced interface tension of the system containing nanoparticles [70]. Roustaei et al. [71] have studied the efficiency of poly-silicone nanoparticles by measuring the contact angle and interface tension parameters. They have detected a decline in the interface of oil and water (from about 26 to 2 mN·m−1) and an increase in the enhanced oil recovery by using the nanoparticles [71]. Efficiency of the suspended solutions containing hydrophilic polysilicone nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery was investigated by Hendraningrat et al. [72]. They have reported a decline in the interface tension of oil and water at the presence of nanoparticles in which solid surfaces get more water-wet. They have eventually observed a 5percent improvement in the oil recovery at the presence of nanoparticles [72]. Moghadam and Azizian have studied the influence of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the behavior of anionic surfactants at the interface of the two fluids. They have confirmed a significant decline in the interface tension of the surfactant and oil at the presence of nanoparticles [73]. Fig. 4 illustrates the percentage of papers on interfacial tension compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017. nanofluid applicationin IFT reduction/%
240
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Years Fig. 4. The percentage of papers on interfacial tension compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017.
nanofluid application in wettability alteration/%
5.3. Influence of nanoparticles on emulsion stability 25
20
15
10
5
0
Years Fig. 3. The percentage of papers published on wettability alteration by nanoparticles compared to the other chemical EOR processes.
Asumadu-Mensah et al. [74] have studied the impacts of nanoparticles including aluminum, copper and their oxides on emulsion stability. It was found that oil–water separation will be easier by using hydrophilic nanoparticles and the emulsion stability will decrease [74]. In another study, Al Otaibi et al. [75] have revealed that stable emulsion can be formed by carbon dioxide, nanoparticle and water. Concentration of the nanoparticles and water volume fraction were reported as the most affecting parameters on the emulsion stability [75]. Influence of nanoparticles on emulsion stability under the reservoir condition was also investigated by Binks and Whitby [76]. They have concluded that the surface charge is an essential parameter for stability and pH must be adjusted and controlled to reach stability [76]. Pei et al. [77] have studied the stability of emulsion by adding nanoparticles in micromodel experiments. The results ascertained that adding nanoparticles can increase the thickness of the emulsion layer and improve the mobility. The heavy oil also gets emulsion by injecting the emulsions which were stabilized with nanoparticles and surfactants.
nanofluid application in emulsion stabilty/%
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246 20
stabilized with nanoparticles and surfactants. They have concluded by performing core flooding experiments that up to 82% of the in-situ oil can be produced by this method [79]. Fig. 5 shows the percentage of papers on formation and stability of emulsions compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017.
18 16 14 12 10
5.4. Influence of nanoparticles on foam stability
8 6 4 2 0
Years Fig. 5. The percentage of papers on formation and stability of emulsions compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017.
nanofluid application in foam stabilty/%
241
25
20
15
10
5
0
Years Fig. 6. The percentage of papers on formation and stability of foam compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017.
They have claimed that these stabilized emulsions can produce 40% of the in-situ oil by means of EOR processes [77]. In a recent effort by Kim and Krishnamoorti [78], the formed emulsion of oil in saltwater was measured and evaluated by using silica nanoparticles and four types of surfactants (cationic, anionic, ion-dipole and nonionic). It was found that these emulsions are highly efficient as well as low cost [78]. Griffith et al. [79] have studied the influence of mineral oil production through the injection of pentane emulsions in water which was
Espinoza et al. [80] have studied the effects of nanoparticles on controlling mobility of superheated carbon-dioxide foams. Based on the results, nanoparticles with 0.05 wt.%. can create stable foams. They reported that salinity has great impacts on the foam stability. They also succeeded to create foams in high temperatures such as 95 °C by using nanoparticles [80]. Aminzadeh-goharrizi et al. [81] have studied the stability of carbondioxide foams in water under the effects of surfaced modified nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were claimed to alter the movement pattern and the distribution of carbon-dioxide in environment, also, they have showed the capabilities to reduce carbon-dioxide mobility [81]. Mo et al. [82] have also conducted experiments to determine the factors affecting foam stability at the presence of nanoparticles. They have measured the optimum nanoparticle concentration under the experimental conditions to be in the range of 2000 to 3500 μl·L−1 [82]. Performance of the nanoparticle-stabilized foams in enhanced oil recovery was investigated by Yu et al. [83]. They have claimed that such foams can enhance oil recovery in cores with low and high permeability [83]. Performance of the modified nanoparticles in stabilizing carbon-dioxide foams was also evaluated by Zhang et al. [84]. They have confirmed the high effectiveness of the surface modified nanoparticles of silica in forming stable emulsions of oil in water and carbon-dioxide foams in water. Foams which were produced in this way can be stable in 95 °C and up to 10% salinity [84]. Fig. 6 shows the percentage of papers on formation and stability of foam compared to the other chemical EOR processes published between 2001 and 2017. 5.5. Influence of nanoparticles on enhanced oil recovery As noted above, nanofluids with different mechanisms contribute to the enhanced oil recovery. Therefore, various aspects of the application of nanoparticles have been discussed in previous studies. The present study addresses changes in wettability, reduction of interfacial tension, emulsion formation, and foam stability and formation. Fig. 7 shows the percentage of nanofluid application in each of the mechanisms studied in different years.
Percentage of nanofluid application
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
Years
Wettability Alteration
IFT Reduction
Emulsions Stability
Foam Stability
Fig. 7. The percentage of nanofluid application in each of EOR mechanisms compared with other techniques.
242
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
As it is shown in Fig. 7, nanofluid studies have paid more focus on wettability than other mechanisms. Fig. 7 shows that the application of nanofluids for enhanced oil recovery gains increasing attention compared to other methods.
Researchers have recently succeeded to create water–oil emulsions with metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles and improve oil properties by in-situ utilization of the emulsions. These emulsions contain nanoparticles with catalytic and absorption properties which can be
Table 1 An overview of studies on the use of nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery from reservoirs Author
Method
Reservoir rock
Results
Subject
Aminzadeh Goharrizi [89]
Core flooding
Boise sandstone
Experimental measurement of sweep efficiency during multi-phase displacement in the presence of nanoparticles
Assef et al. [90]
Core flooding
Sandstone
Bagaria et al. [91]
Chemical method
Cieśliński and Krygier [92]
Contact angle
Ehtesabi et al. [93]
Core flooding
Nanoparticles can reduce the mobility of the injected CO2 as an alternative to saltwater, improving the sweep efficiency by about 20%. Increasing the Zeta potential from 3 to about 9, minimizing damages, preventing severe connections in the vicinity of the well, and improving communication between the well and virgin formation Significant increase in spatial stabilization of nanoparticles and very low absorption at silica levels even in severe API brine The contact angle of the nanofluids drops depends on the roughness of the surface, the type of substrate, the nanoparticle materials, and the concentration of the nanoparticles. The main mechanism enhancing the sweep efficiency is the change in the wettability of the rock surface from an oil-wet state to a hydrophilic state because of deposition of TiO2 nanoparticles. A significant reduction in the viscosity of heavy oil and bitumen at low concentrations CTAB and SDBS surfactants are unable to stabilize nickel nanoparticles because they are not able to create ζ potential needed to prevent van der Waals force. CTAB surfactant concentration plays an important role in the transport of particles to the water and oil interface. The particle distribution depends on the heterogeneity of the medium and the injection flow Clear improvement of the effluent water quality by flooding of the nanoparticles The use of nanoparticles can increase the clay stability and can also control the clay migration more effectively. The presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles can contribute to reducing the asphaltene precipitation intensity. The addition of HP-b-CD monomer to the solution reduces its viscosity. Extreme temperature dependence for the SDS surface was observed with low viscosity at high temperatures. Hydrophilic nanoparticles can postpone the drinking process for more hydrophilic stones, but they do not have much impact on wettability alteration. These nano-hydrophobics can increase the hydrophobicity of neutral wettability cores and increase the wettability index of more hydrophilic cores by 10%. With the increase in temperature and decrease in size, the effective thermal conductivity increases. Nano-polymers have been used for altering wettability and improving the relative permeability and movement through the porous medium. Concentration, type, and particle size are the main parameters affecting viscosity reduction. The optimum values of these parameters are effective on heavy-oil thermal applications. The addition of nanoparticles at low concentrations increases the stability of the stabilized surfactant foam. Introducing the new concept of EOR by enhancing the macroscopic displacement as the microscopic deviation. A 20% decrease in Spr due to the presence of nanoparticles Increased oil harvest The contact angle increases with nanofluid concentrations for similar droplet size and starts to reduce after culmination. 50% of crude oil can be harvested from Berea sandstones using the IIT nanofluids. This reduces to 17% when using only saltwater solution, indicating the good performance of IIT nanofluids in an aqueous medium with high salinity For both emulsions with increasing concentrations of nanoparticles, more dispersed phase emulsions are formed, the volumetric function of the dispersed phase in the emulsion increases, and average droplet diameter decreases
Plates made of glass
Greff and Babadagli Thermal [94] Micromodel Hamedi-Shokrlu and Babadagli [95]
Huang and Clark [96]
Core flooding
Kazemzadeh et al. [97] Kjøniksen et al. [98]
IFT
Li et al. [99]
Adsorption and wettability
Mintsa et al. [100]
Thermal
ShamsiJazeyi et al. [54]
Chemical method
Shokrlu and Babadagli [101]
Thermal
Singh and Mohanty [102] Skauge et al. [58]
Core flooding
Berea sandstone
Core Flooding
Berea sandstone
Vafaei et al. [103]
Contact angle
Glass and silicon wafers
Chemical method
Zhang et al. [104]
Zhang et al. [105]
Berea sandstone
Berea sandstone
Emulsion
Controlling interactions of colloidal particles and porous media during low salinity water flooding and alkaline flooding by MgO nanoparticles Iron oxide nanoparticles grafted with sulfonated copolymers are stable in concentrated brine at elevated temperatures and weakly adsorb on silica Augmentation of the critical heat flux in water–Al2O3, water–TiO2 and water–Cu nanofluids
Enhanced heavy oil recovery using TiO2 nanoparticles: investigation of deposition during transport in core plug
Catalytic effects of nano-size metal ions in breaking asphaltene molecules during thermal recovery of heavy-oil Stabilization of nanometal catalysts and their interaction with oleic phase in porous media during enhanced oil recovery
Enhancing oil recovery with specialized nanoparticles by controlling formation-fines migration at their sources in waterflooding reservoirs Impact of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation during CO2 injection Modified polysaccharides for use in enhanced oil recovery applications
Effect of silica nanoparticles adsorption on the wettability index of Berea sandstone
New temperature dependent thermal conductivity data for water-based nanofluids Polymer-coated nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery
Viscosity reduction of heavy oil/bitumen using micro-and nano-metal particles during aqueous and non-aqueous thermal applications Synergy between nanoparticles and surfactants in stabilizing foams for oil recovery Nano-sized particles for EOR
Effect of nanoparticles on sessile droplet contact angle
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using nanoparticle dispersions: Underlying mechanism and imbibition experiments Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions for applications in enhanced oil recovery
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
243
Table 2 An overview of studies on flooding carbonate reservoirs using nanofluids(1mD=10-3μm2) Subject
Conclusion
Porosity/% Permeability/mD Nanoparticle Authors
Adsorption of novel nonionic surfactant and particle mixture in carbonates: enhanced oil recovery implication
With increasing concentrations of silica nanoparticles, the adsorption on the surface of carbonate rock decreases. Nanoparticle efficiency to reduce surface adsorption of surfactant nanoparticles depends on these nanoparticles. Oil recovery production factor up to 85%
12.39
1–10
SiO2
Ahmadi and Shadizadeh [106]
10–24
77–149
Haroun et al. [88]
The results for CO2 mixing conditions have shown the improved porosity and permeability and reduced asphaltene accumulation in the porous media as well as increased nanoparticle production. Nanoparticle size and their different properties, especially their surface properties are the main keys to improve production. A significant amount of oil can be produced in the core itself in the presence of nanosilicates during the drinking process. The recovery rated increased by 20% during the replacement process of water instead of gas in the presence of nanoparticles compared to the situation without nanoparticles. Surface and chemical properties of nanoparticles are important for improving the stability of the nanoparticles. Their recognition also reduces the spontaneous accumulation, increases homogeneity, and reduces reaction with the rock matrix. Small variations were found in the contact angle in the presence of modified and non-modified anionic, cationic, and non-ionic surfactants. The particle size does not have much impact on the contact angle.
8.093 16.953 15.941
2.982 7.285 6.943
Fe3O4 NiO CuO NiO
–
–
Metal oxide
Ayatollahi and Zerafat [108]
20
30
ZrO2
Karimi et al. [109]
10.33
2.839
SiO2
Moradi et al. [25]
24.6
142
Fe3O4
Kanj et al. [110]
–
–
SiO2
Metin et al. [111]
Smart nano-EOR process for Abu Dhabi carbonate reservoirs On the application of NiO nanoparticles to mitigate in situ asphaltene deposition in carbonate porous matrix Nanotechnology assisted EOR technique: new solution to old challenges Wettability alteration in carbonates using zirconium oxide nanofluids: EOR implications Application of SiO2 nano particles to improve the performance of water alternating gas EOR process
Nanofluid coreflood experiments in the ARAB-D
Adsorption of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles onto mineral surfaces and decane/water interface
dispersed in the porous structure of the reservoir and the well pipes to provide multiple applications such as removal of the asphaltene sediments through the adsorption process. Some experiments have been conducted on the influence of different parameters and the performance of nanoparticles which are briefly addressed as follows. Chen et al. [85] also have studied on reducing the viscosity of heavy oils by nanoparticles. In this approach, nanoparticles react with the heavy oil by means of steam and act as a catalyst that loosens the bonds of N, S and O with the carbon; hence, components including aromatics and saturated hydrocarbons are produced due to the variation in the heavy oil structure. It also diminishes the percentage of asphaltene and resins primarily due to the breaks in the C\\O bonds of the molecule, C\\C bonds in the adjacent hydrocarbon chains and the C\\S bonds. Accordingly, in addition to the reduction in heavy parts of the oil, light parts act as solvents and reduce the oil viscosity. Results have emphasized on 80 to 93% reduction in the heavy oil in 200 and 280 °C [85]. Nassar et al. [86] have conducted multiple experiments on the influence of nanoparticles and different parameters on the recovery of oil comprising high asphaltene content. The results are briefly mentioned as follows. Performance of the nanoparticles including oxides of nickel, cobalt and iron can be sorted as: NiO N Co3O4 N Fe3O4. Here, the performance is defined as the abilities to oxidation and absorption as well as the catalytic ability. Asphaltene is spontaneously adsorbed on the nanoparticle surfaces with an exothermic nature [86]. Ogolo et al. [87] have claimed that some nanoparticles can enhance the oil recovery which this performance is also improved at the presence of ethanol. They also introduced the mechanisms by which nanoparticles improve the recovery process as: wettability alteration of the rock, IFT reduction, reduction in the oil viscosity, reduction of mobility ratio and permeability variations [87].
Hashemi et al. [107]
Haroun et al. [88] have compared the smart injection of water and nanoparticles. They have concluded that the recovery coefficient of a reservoir which is measured to be 46% to 63% by injecting the water, can be enhanced to the range of 57% to 85% by selecting the proper nanoparticle [88].
6. Field Applications of Nanoparticles The first field experience of nanoparticle injection was performed in the Liauhe field of China in which nanoparticles were injected through the steam.4 But in the Ghawar field of Saudi Arabia, about 5 kg of A-Dot nanoparticle was mixed with 255 barrels of sea water in 2012 and injected to one of the observation wells. The injection process was continued until the nanoparticles had advanced about 20 ft (1 ft = 0.3048 m) in the reservoir. The well was subsequently closed for 3 days and the oil production was then resumed. The samples indicated that 90% of the nanoparticles had been successfully recovered.5 Table 1 summarizes studies on the application of nanoparticles in the enhanced oil recovery from reservoirs. The table shows the research methodology, the reservoir rock materials, and a part of the results. One of the common uses of nanoparticles is their use in carbonate rock reservoirs. The following table shows some of the results and application of nanoparticles in the flooding of carbonate rocks. Table 2 also shows the permeability, porosity of the rock, the type and size of the nanoparticles along with the main results. Table 3 shows some of the results and application of nanoparticles in the flooding of sandstone rocks.
4 http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Chinese-Scientists-Discover-New-Method-toIncrease-Recoverable-Oil-from-Wells.html 5 https://www.aramcoexpats.com
244
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
Table 3 An overview of studies on flooding sandstone reservoirs using nanofluids Nanoparticle type
Nanoparticle concentration/wt%
Additional recovery factor/%
Base fluids
Authors
SiO2 Al2O3 Ni2O3 MgO Fe2O3 ZnO ZrO2 SnO SiO2 SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 TiO2 SiO2 SiO2
0.02–0.03 0.3
– 12
Water Ethanol Brine water
Ju et al. [17] Onyekonwu and Ogolo [66]
0.1–0.4 0.01–1 0.05
19.31 31 7–11
Ethanol Brine Brine
Shahrabadi et al. [112] Ehtesabi et al. [11] Hendraningrat and Torsæter [28]
1
21
Sharma et al. [113]
SiO2 NANO clay ZrO2 TiO2 MgO Al2O3 CeO2 CNT CaCO3 SiO2 TiO2
0.01–3 0.9 5
29 5.8 8–9
Surfactant Polymer Water Water Brine
1.9–2.5
4
Polymer water
Cheraghian [46]
Acknowledgment Authors would like to sincerely thank Mr. Hosein Doryani and Mr. Hossein Rezvani for their collaboration in this work.
[15]
[16]
References [17] [1] Y. Kazemzadeh, S.E. Eshraghi, K. Kazemi, S. Sourani, M. Mehrabi, Y. Ahmadi, Behavior of asphaltene adsorption onto the metal oxide nanoparticle surface and its effect on heavy oil recovery, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (1) (2015) 233–239. [2] H. Doryani, Y. Kazemzadeh, R. Parsaei, M.R. Malayeri, M. Riazi, Impact of asphaltene and normal paraffins on methane–synthetic oil interfacial tension: An experimental study, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26 (2015) 538–548. [3] H. Doryani, M.R. Malayeri, M. Riazi, Visualization of asphaltene precipitation and deposition in a uniformly patterned glass micromodel, Fuel 182 (2016) 613–622. [4] A.M.S. Ragab, M. El-Mahdy, Unlocking reservoir potential using robust hybrid nanoparticles designed for future enhanced oil recovery, Mediterranean Offshore Conference & Exhibition (MOC 2016). Egypt April, 2016, pp. 19–21. [5] Y. Kazemzadeh, S.E. Eshraghi, S. Sourani, M. Reyhani, An interface-analyzing technique to evaluate the heavy oil swelling in presence of nickel oxide nanoparticles, J. Mol. Liq. 211 (2015) 553–559. [6] S. Emadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, A.K. Manshad, A.M. Rahimi, A.H. Mohammadi, Effect of nano silica particles on Interfacial Tension (IFT) and mobility control of natural surfactant (Cedr Extraction) solution in enhanced oil recovery process by nano-surfactant flooding, J. Mol. Liq. 248 (2017) 163–167. [7] C.M. Sukesh, B. Deka, Nano particle based polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery: A review, International Conference on Nano for Energy and Water, Springer, Cham February 2017, pp. 73–79. [8] O.M. Isdahl, Influence of Silica Based Nanofluid on the Physical Properties, IFT, and CO2 Diffusion in a Carbonated Water-n-decane System: An Experimental and Numerical Study, Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway, 2017. [9] H. Rezvani, M. Riazi, M. Tabaei, Y. Kazemzadeh, M. Sharifi, Experimental investigation of interfacial properties in the EOR mechanisms by the novel synthesized Fe3O4@Chitosan nanocomposites, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 544 (2018) 15–27. [10] M.N. Agista, A Literature Review and Transport Modelling of Nanoparticles for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway, 2017. [11] H. Ehtesabi, M.M. Ahadian, V. Taghikhani, M.H. Ghazanfari, Enhanced heavy oil recovery in sandstone cores using TiO2 nanofluids, Energy Fuel 28 (1) (2013) 423–430. [12] Q. Li, B. Wei, L. Lu, Y. Li, Y. Wen, W. Pu, C. Wang, Investigation of physical properties and displacement mechanisms of surface-grafted nano-cellulose fluids for enhanced oil recovery, Fuel 207 (2017) 352–364. [13] S. Gomaa, A. Salem, M. Hassan, Relative Permeability Curves and Wettability Alterations by Alumina Nano Particles Flooding. JAUES 42 (12) (2017) 103–119. [14] R. Parsaei, Y. Kazemzadeh, A.K. Abadshapoori, M. Riazi, Study of asphaltene precipitation during CO2 injection to oil reservoirs in the presence of iron oxide
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] [24]
[25]
[26]
[27] [28]
[29]
[30]
El-Diasty [59] Cheraghian [114] Nazari Moghaddam et al. [24]
nanoparticles by interfacial tension and bond number measurements, 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017, June 2017. A.R. Kanna, S.N. Gummadi, G.S. Kumar, Evaluation of bio-surfactant on microbial EOR using sand packed column, Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering, Springer, Singapore 2016, pp. 121–128. R.S. Alvim, O.A. Babilonia, Y.M. Celaschi, C.R. Miranda, Nanoscience applied to oil recovery and mitigation: A multiscale computational approach, MRS Advances 2 (9) (2017) 477–482. B. Ju, T. Fan, M. Ma, Enhanced oil recovery by flooding with hydrophilic nanoparticles, China Particuology 4 (1) (2006) 41–46. M.S. Hosseini, M.T. Sadeghi, M. Khazaei, Wettability alteration from superhydrophobic to superhydrophilic via synthesized stable nano-coating, Surf. Coat. Technol. 326 (2017) 79–86. Y. Kazemzadeh, R. Parsaei, M. Riazi, Experimental study of asphaltene precipitation prediction during gas injection to oil reservoirs by interfacial tension measurement, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 466 (2015) 138–146. J.M Smith, H.C. van Ness, M.M Abbott, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th edition, McGraw Hill International Book Company, New York, 1996. M. Almahfood, B. Bai, The synergistic effects of nanoparticle-surfactant nanofluids in EOR applications, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 171 (2018) 196–210. S. Hassanpour, M.R. Malayeri, M. Riazi, Utilization of Co3O4 nanoparticles for reducing precipitation of asphaltene during CO2 injection, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31 (2016) 39–47. M. Safari, A. Golsefatan, A. Rezaei, M. Jamialahmadi, Simulation of silica nanoparticle flooding for enhancing oil recovery, Pet. Sci. Technol. 33 (2) (2015) 152–158. R. Nazari Moghaddam, A. Bahramian, Z. Fakhroueian, A. Karimi, S. Arya, Comparative study of using nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery: Wettability alteration of carbonate rocks, Energy Fuel 29 (4) (2015) 2111–2119. B. Moradi, P. Pourafshary, F.J. Farahani, M. Mohammadi, M.A. Emadi, Application of SiO2 nano particles to improve the performance of water alternating gas EOR process, SPE Oil & Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, November 2015. Q. Sun, Z. Li, S. Li, L. Jiang, J. Wang, P. Wang, Utilization of surfactant-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery by adding nanoparticles, Energy Fuel 28 (4) (2014) 2384–2394. C. Negin, S. Ali, Q. Xie, Application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery — A review, Petroleum 2 (4) (2016) 324–333. L. Hendraningrat, O. Torsaeter, Unlocking the potential of metal oxides nanoparticles to enhance the oil recovery, Offshore Technology Conference-Asia. Offshore Technology Conference, March 2014. C. Zheng, Y. Cheng, Q. Wei, X. Li, Z. Zhang, Suspension of surface-modified nanoSiO2 in partially hydrolyzed aqueous solution of polyacrylamide for enhanced oil recovery, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 524 (2017) 169–177. R.R. Manesh, M. Kohnehpoushi, M. Eskandari, Z. Fakhroueian, B.A. Nejand, Synthesis and evaluation of nano γ-Al2O3 with spherical, rod-shaped, and plate-like morphologies on enhanced heavy oil recovery, Mater. Res. Express 4 (9) (2017), 095025.
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246 [31] O. Torsater, S. Li, L. Hendraningrat, Effect of some parameters influencing enhanced oil recovery process using silica nanoparticles: An experimental investigation, SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, September 2013. [32] S. Li, O. Torsæter, Experimental investigation of the influence of nanoparticles adsorption and transport on wettability alteration for oil wet Berea sandstone, SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, March 2015. [33] S.A. Amirsadat, B. Moradi, A.Z. Hezave, S. Najimi, M.H. Farsangi, Investigating the effect of nano-silica on efficiency of the foam in enhanced oil recovery, Korean J. Chem. Eng. (2017) 1–6. [34] I.K. Mo, An Experimental Study of the Use of Silica and CNC Nanofluids for EOR by Spontaneous Imbibition, Master's Thesis, NTNU, 2017. [35] A. Bera, H. Belhaj, Application of nanotechnology by means of nanoparticles and nanodispersions in oil recovery — A comprehensive review, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 34 (2016) 1284–1309. [36] R. Hashemi, N.N. Nassar, P.P. Almao, Nanoparticle technology for heavy oil in-situ upgrading and recovery enhancement: Opportunities and challenges, Appl. Energy 133 (2014) 374–387. [37] T. Zhang, M.J. Murphy, H. Yu, H.G. Bagaria, K.Y. Yoon, B.M. Nielson, ... S.L. Bryant, Investigation of nanoparticle adsorption during transport in porous media, SPE J. 20 (04) (2014) 667–677. [38] H. Zhang, T.S. Ramakrishnan, A. Nikolov, D. Wasan, Enhanced oil recovery driven by nanofilm structural disjoining pressure: Flooding experiments and microvisualization, Energy Fuel 30 (4) (2016) 2771–2779. [39] Z. Hu, S.M. Azmi, G. Raza, P.W. Glover, D. Wen, Nanoparticle-assisted waterflooding in Berea sandstones, Energy Fuel 30 (4) (2016) 2791–2804. [40] S.J. Kim, I.C. Bang, J. Buongiorno, L.W. Hu, Effects of nanoparticle deposition on surface wettability influencing boiling heat transfer in nanofluids, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (15) (2006), 153107. [41] R.G. Chaudhuri, S. Paria, The wettability of PTFE and glass surfaces by nanofluids, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 434 (2014) 141–151. [42] A.E. Bayat, R. Junin, S. Shamshirband, W.T. Chong, Transport and retention of engineered Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 nanoparticles through various sedimentary rocks, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015). [43] Z. Xue, E. Foster, Y. Wang, S. Nayak, V. Cheng, V.W. Ngo, ... K.P. Johnston, Effect of grafted copolymer composition on iron oxide nanoparticle stability and transport in porous media at high salinity, Energy Fuel 28 (6) (2014) 3655–3665. [44] F. Babayekhorasani, D.E. Dunstan, R. Krishnamoorti, J.C. Conrad, Nanoparticle dispersion in disordered porous media with and without polymer additives, Soft Matter 12 (26) (2016) 5676–5683. [45] A.M.S. Ragab, A.E. Hannora, An experimental investigation of silica nano particles for enhanced oil recovery applications, SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, September 2015. [46] G. Cheraghian, L. Hendraningrat, A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part B: Effects of nanoparticles on flooding, Int. Nano Lett. 6 (1) (2016) 1–10. [47] A. Khezrnejad, L.A. James, T.E. Johansen, Nanofluid enhanced oil recovery — Mobility ratio, surface chemistry, or both? International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada August 2015, pp. 16–21. [48] H. Soleimani, N. Yahya, M.K. Baig, L. Khodapanah, M. Sabet, A.H. Bhat, ... M. Awang, Catalytic effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on oil–water interfacial tension, Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 11 (1) (2016) 263–269. [49] H.M. Zaid, N.S.A. Radzi, N.R.A. Latiff, A. Shafie, in: S.C. Dass, B.H. Guan, A.H. Bhat, I. Faye, H. Soleimani, N. Yahya (Eds.), Effect of Morphology of Aluminium Oxide Nanoparticles on Viscosity and Interfacial Tension (IFT) and the Recovery Efficiency in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1621, No. 1, AIP October 2014, pp. 705–710. [50] A. Ghamartale, R. Saboori, S. Sabbaghi, The effect of micro/nanoparticles on pressure drop in Oil pipeline: Simulation, Int. J. Nano Dimens. 7 (3) (2016) 225. [51] M.S Alnarabiji, N. Yahya, S. Nadeem, et al., Nanofluid enhanced oil recovery using induced ZnO nanocrystals by electromagnetic energy: Viscosity increment, Fuel. 233 (2018) 632–643. [52] X. Zhu, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, F. Wei, Review on the nanoparticle fluidization science and technology, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 24 (1) (2016) 9–22. [53] I.S. Grover, S. Singh, B. Pal, The preparation, surface structure, zeta potential, surface charge density and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanostructures of different shapes, Appl. Surf. Sci. 280 (2013) 366–372. [54] H. ShamsiJazeyi, C.A. Miller, M.S. Wong, J.M. Tour, R. Verduzco, Polymer-coated nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 (15) (2014). [55] J. Liu, F. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Fang, Z. Zhang, Thermodynamic properties and thermal stability of ionic liquid-based nanofluids containing graphene as advanced heat transfer fluids for medium-to-high-temperature applications, Renew. Energy 63 (2014) 519–523. [56] A. Patel, C. Goh, B. Towler, V. Rudolph, T.E. Rufford, Screening of nanoparticles to control clay swelling in coal bed methane wells, International Petroleum Technology Conference. International Petroleum Technology Conference, November 2016. [57] V.K. Sharma, K.M. Siskova, R. Zboril, J.L. Gardea-Torresdey, Organic-coated silver nanoparticles in biological and environmental conditions: Fate, stability and toxicity, Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 204 (2014) 15–34. [58] T. Skauge, K. Spildo, A. Skauge, Nano-sized particles for EOR, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2010. [59] A.I. El-Diasty, A.M. Aly, Understanding the mechanism of nanoparticles applications in enhanced oil recovery, SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, September 2015.
245
[60] A. Chengara, A.D. Nikolov, D.T. Wasan, A. Trokhymchuk, D. Henderson, Spreading of nanofluids driven by the structural disjoining pressure gradient, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 280 (1) (2004) 192–201. [61] D. Wang, H. Duan, H. Möhwald, The water/oil interface: The emerging horizon for self-assembly of nanoparticles, Soft Matter 1 (6) (2005) 412–416. [62] A. Maghzi, A. Mohebbi, R. Kharrat, M.H. Ghazanfari, Pore-scale monitoring of wettability alteration by silica nanoparticles during polymer flooding to heavy oil in a five-spot glass micromodel, Transp. Porous Media 87 (3) (2011) 653–664. [63] S. Al-Anssari, A. Barifcani, S. Wang, S. Iglauer, Wettability alteration of oil-wet carbonate by silica nanofluid, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 461 (2016) 435–442. [64] T. Zhang, M. Roberts, S.L. Bryant, C. Huh, Foams and emulsions stabilized with nanoparticles for potential conformance control applications, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2009. [65] B. Ju, T. Fan, Experimental study and mathematical model of nanoparticle transport in porous media, Powder Technol. 192 (2) (2009) 195–202. [66] M.O. Onyekonwu, N.A. Ogolo, Investigating the use of nanoparticles in enhancing oil recovery, Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2010. [67] B. Karimi, M. Gholinejad, M. Khorasani, Highly efficient three-component coupling reaction catalyzed by gold nanoparticles supported on periodic mesoporous organosilica with ionic liquid framework, Chem. Commun. 48 (71) (2012) 8961–8963. [68] J. Giraldo, P. Benjumea, S. Lopera, F.B. Cortés, M.A. Ruiz, Wettability alteration of sandstone cores by alumina-based nanofluids, Energy Fuel 27 (7) (2013) 3659–3665. [69] N. Cao, M.A. Mohammed, T. Babadagli, Wettability alteration of heavy-oil–bitumen-containing carbonates by use of solvents, high-pH solutions, and nano/ionic liquids, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 20 (02) (2017) 363–371. [70] B.A. Suleimanov, F.S. Ismailov, E.F. Veliyev, Nanofluid for enhanced oil recovery, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 78 (2) (2011) 431–437. [71] A. Roustaei, J. Moghadasi, H. Bagherzadeh, A. Shahrabadi, An experimental investigation of polysilicon nanoparticles' recovery efficiencies through changes in interfacial tension and wettability alteration, SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [72] L. Hendraningrat, S. Li, O. Torsæter, Enhancing oil recovery of low-permeability Berea sandstone through optimised nanofluids concentration, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013. [73] T. Fereidooni Moghadam, S. Azizian, Effect of ZnO nanoparticle and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide on the dynamic and equilibrium oil– water interfacial tension, J. Phys. Chem. B 118 (6) (2014) 1527–1534. [74] A. Asumadu-Mensah, K.W. Smith, H.S. Ribeiro, Solid lipid dispersions: Potential delivery system for functional ingredients in foods, J. Food Sci. 78 (7) (2013) E1000–E1008. [75] F.M. Al Otaibi, S.L. Kokal, Y. Chang, J.F. AlQahtani, A.M. AlAbdulwahab, Gelled emulsion of CO–water-nanoparticles, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, September 2013. [76] B.P. Binks, C.P. Whitby, Nanoparticle silica-stabilised oil-in-water emulsions: Improving emulsion stability, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 253 (1) (2005) 105–115. [77] H.H. Pei, G.C. Zhang, J.J. Ge, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, L.P. Fu, Investigation of nanoparticle and surfactant stabilized emulsion to enhance oil recovery in waterflooded heavy oil reservoirs, SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, June 2015. [78] D. Kim, R. Krishnamoorti, Interfacial activity of poly[oligo(ethylene oxide)– monomethyl ether methacrylate]-grafted silica nanoparticles, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (14) (2015) 3648–3656. [79] N. Griffith, Y. Ahmad, H. Daigle, C. Huh, Nanoparticle-stabilized natural gas liquidin-water emulsions for residual oil recovery, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, April 2016. [80] D.A. Espinoza, F.M. Caldelas, K.P. Johnston, S.L. Bryant, C. Huh, Nanoparticle-stabilized supercritical CO2 foams for potential mobility control applications, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2010. [81] B. Aminzadeh-goharrizi, C. Huh, S.L. Bryant, D.A. DiCarlo, M. Roberts, Effect of nanoparticles on flow alteration during CO2 injection, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [82] D. Mo, J. Yu, N. Liu, R.L. Lee, Study of the effect of different factors on nanoparticlestabilized CO2 foam for mobility control, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [83] J. Yu, C. An, D. Mo, N. Liu, R.L. Lee, Study of adsorption and transportation behavior of nanoparticles in three different porous media, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [84] T. Zhang, D. Espinosa, K.Y. Yoon, A.R. Rahmani, H. Yu, F.M. Caldelas, T.E. Milner, Engineered nanoparticles as harsh-condition emulsion and foam stabilizers and as novel sensors, Offshore Technology Conference, Offshore Technology Conference, January 2011. [85] Y. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Lu, C. Wu, The viscosity reduction of nano-keggin-K3PMo12O40 in catalytic aquathermolysis of heavy oil, Fuel 88 (8) (2009) 1426–1434. [86] N.N. Nassar, A. Hassan, P. Pereira-Almao, Metal oxide nanoparticles for asphaltene adsorption and oxidation, Energy Fuel 25 (3) (2011) 1017–1023. [87] N. Ogolo, O. Olafuyi, M. Onyekonwu, Enhanced oil recovery using nanoparticles, SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012. [88] M.R. Haroun, S. Alhassan, A.A. Ansari, N.A.M. Al Kindy, N. Abou Sayed, A. Kareem, ... H.K. Sarma, Smart nano-EOR process for Abu Dhabi carbonate reservoirs, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012.
246
Y. Kazemzadeh et al. / Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27 (2019) 237–246
[89] B. Aminzadeh Goharrizi, Experimental Measurement of Sweep Efficiency During Multi-phase Displacement in the Presence of Nanoparticles, PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 2013. [90] Y. Assef, P. Pourafshary, H. Hejazi, Controlling interactions of colloidal particles and porous media during low salinity water flooding and alkaline flooding By MgO nanoparticles, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Society of Petroleum Engineers, March 2016. [91] H.G. Bagaria, Z. Xue, B.M. Neilson, A.J. Worthen, K.Y. Yoon, S. Nayak, K.P. Johnston, Iron oxide nanoparticles grafted with sulfonated copolymers are stable in concentrated brine at elevated temperatures and weakly adsorb on silica, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 (8) (2013) 3329–3339. [92] J.T. Cieśliński, K. Krygier, Augmentation of the Critical Heat Flux in Water–Al2O3, Water–TiO2 and Water–Cu Nanofluids, MATEC Web of Conferences Vol. 18 (2014), EDP Sciences. 01012. [93] H. Ehtesabi, M.M. Ahadian, V. Taghikhani, Enhanced heavy oil recovery using TiO2 nanoparticles: Investigation of deposition during transport in core plug, Energy Fuel 29 (1) (2014) 1–8. [94] J. Greff, T. Babadagli, Catalytic effects of nano-size metal ions in breaking asphaltene molecules during thermal recovery of heavy-oil, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2011. [95] Y. Hamedi-Shokrlu, T. Babadagli, Stabilization of nanometal catalysts and their interaction with oleic phase in porous media during enhanced oil recovery, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (20) (2014) 8464–8475. [96] T.T. Huang, D.E. Clark, Enhancing oil recovery with specialized nanoparticles by controlling formation-fines migration at their sources in waterflooding reservoirs, SPE J. 20 (04) (2015) 743–746. [97] Y. Kazemzadeh, M.R. Malayeri, M. Riazi, R. Parsaei, Impact of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation during CO2 injection, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 22 (2015) 227–234. [98] A.L. Kjøniksen, N. Beheshti, H.K. Kotlar, K. Zhu, B. Nyström, Modified polysaccharides for use in enhanced oil recovery applications, Eur. Polym. J. 44 (4) (2008) 959–967. [99] S. Li, A.T. Kaasa, L. Hendraningrat, O. Torsæter, Effect of silica nanoparticles adsorption on the wettability index of Berea sandstone, Paper SCA2013-059 Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Held in Napa Valley, California, USA September 2013, pp. 16–19. [100] H.A. Mintsa, G. Roy, C.T. Nguyen, D. Doucet, New temperature dependent thermal conductivity data for water-based nanofluids, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48 (2) (2009) 363–371. [101] Y.H. Shokrlu, T. Babadagli, Viscosity reduction of heavy oil/bitumen using microand nano-metal particles during aqueous and non-aqueous thermal applications, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 119 (2014) 210–220.
[102] R. Singh, K.K. Mohanty, Synergy between nanoparticles and surfactants in stabilizing foams for oil recovery, Energy Fuel 29 (2) (2015) 467–479. [103] S. Vafaei, T. Borca-Tasciuc, M.Z. Podowski, A. Purkayastha, G. Ramanath, P.M. Ajayan, Effect of nanoparticles on sessile droplet contact angle, Nanotechnology 17 (10) (2006) 2523. [104] H. Zhang, A. Nikolov, D. Wasan, Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using nanoparticle dispersions: Underlying mechanism and imbibition experiments, Energy Fuel 28 (5) (2014) 3002–3009. [105] T. Zhang, D. Davidson, S.L. Bryant, C. Huh, Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions for applications in enhanced oil recovery, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2010. [106] M.A. Ahmadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, Adsorption of novel nonionic surfactant and particles mixture in carbonates: Enhanced oil recovery implication, Energy Fuel 26 (8) (2012) 4655–4663. [107] S.I. Hashemi, B. Fazelabdolabadi, S. Moradi, A.M. Rashidi, A. Shahrabadi, H. Bagherzadeh, On the application of NiO nanoparticles to mitigate in situ asphaltene deposition in carbonate porous matrix, Appl. Nanosci. 6 (1) (2016) 71–81. [108] S. Ayatollahi, M.M. Zerafat, Nanotechnology-assisted EOR techniques: New solutions to old challenges, SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [109] A. Karimi, Z. Fakhroueian, A. Bahramian, N. Pour Khiabani, J.B. Darabad, R. Azin, S. Arya, Wettability alteration in carbonates using zirconium oxide nanofluids: EOR implications, Energy Fuel 26 (2) (2012) 1028–1036. [110] M.Y. Kanj, J.J. Funk, Z. Al-Yousif, Nanofluid coreflood experiments in the ARAB-D, SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2009. [111] C.O. Metin, J.R. Baran, Q.P. Nguyen, Adsorption of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles onto mineral surfaces and decane/water interface, J. Nanopart. Res. 14 (11) (2012) 1246. [112] A. Shahrabadi, H. Bagherzadeh, A. Roostaie, H. Golghanddashti, Experimental investigation of HLP nanofluid potential to enhance oil recovery: A mechanistic approach, SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2012. [113] T. Sharma, N. Velmurugan, P. Patel, B.H. Chon, J.S. Sangwai, Use of oil-in-water pickering emulsion stabilized by nanoparticles in combination with polymer flood for enhanced oil recovery, Pet. Sci. Technol. 33 (17–18) (2015) 1595–1604. [114] G. Cheraghian, An experimental study of surfactant polymer for enhanced heavy oil recovery using a glass micromodel by adding nanoclay, Pet. Sci. Technol. 33 (13–14) (2015) 1410–1417.