Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania

Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania

Accepted Manuscript Title: Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Roma...

220KB Sizes 1 Downloads 49 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania Author: Attila D. S´andor Mirabela O. Dumitrache Gianluca D’amico Botond J. Kiss Andrei D. Mihalca PII: DOI: Reference:

S0304-4017(14)00284-2 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.005 VETPAR 7241

To appear in:

Veterinary Parasitology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

30-1-2014 7-5-2014 8-5-2014

Please cite this article as: S´andor, A.D., Dumitrache, M.O., D’amico, G., Kiss, B.J., Mihalca, A.D.,Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania, Veterinary Parasitology (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.005 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1 2

Rhipicephalus rossicus and not R. sanguineus is the dominant tick species of dogs in the wetlands of the Danube Delta, Romania

3 Attila D. SÁNDOR1, Mirabela O. DUMITRACHE1*, Gianluca D’AMICO1, Botond J. KISS2, Andrei D. MIHALCA1

6 7 8

1

cr

University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Calea Mănă tur 3-5, ClujNapoca 400372, Romania 2

Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Str. Babadag 165, Tulcea 820112, Romania.

us

9 10

ip t

4 5

11

* Corresponding author: Mirabela O. DUMITRACHE, Address: Calea Mănăştur 3-5, ClujNapoca 400372, Romania; Tel: +40264596384; Fax: +40264593792; Email:[email protected])

an

12 13 14

M

15 Abstract

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Changes in the distribution of tick species are among the major causes for the increase in prevalence of zoonotic diseases worldwide, with tick-borne diseases’ prevalence showing an emerging pattern. One of these ticks, Rhipicephalus rossicus, which is reported occasionally from humans, seems to be particularly interesting because of its demonstrated vectorial role for zoonotic pathogens like Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, or CCHF and West Nile viruses. Here we report a case of dominant occurrence of Rhipicephalus rossicus on household dogs in the wetlands of Eastern Europe (Romania). Ticks were collected from dogs in 5 distinct locations, with 1068 ticks of 6 species found. Rhipicephalus rossicus had a dominant occurrence in dogs in all but one location, accounting for 87.1% of all ticks (32.395.3% in different locations). Until this study, R. sanguineus was considered as the only important tick species on dogs in south-temperate regions of Europe, as well in Romania. The dominant presence of R. rossicus in dogs, its vectorial competence and broad host spectrum (including humans), make this tick species an important candidate for further analysis and highlight the paucity of our knowledge on disease vectors in this region of Europe.

Ac ce p

te

d

16

31 32

Keywords: Rhipicephalus rossicus, Eastern Europe, tick, dog

33

1

Page 1 of 8

Main text

35

Ticks harbor more zoonotic pathogens than any other blood-feeding arthropod species

36

globally and they are the second most important vectors of epidemic importance after

37

mosquitoes. Ticks are known vectors for medically important viral diseases like tick-borne

38

encephalitis, louping ill, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), Colorado tick fever,

39

and bacterial diseases, like Lyme disease, tick-borne relapsing fever, Mediterranean spotted

40

fever and Q-fever just to name a few (Dantas-Torres et al., 2012). Moreover, ticks transmit a

41

high number of pathogens affecting livestock and companion animals (Day, 2011; Smith and

42

Wall, 2013). Although most of these diseases have a long epidemiologic history and the

43

importance of ticks as vectors has been widely known, tick-borne diseases’ prevalence shows

44

an emerging pattern (Chomel, 2011; Salman et al., 2013). There are two main hypotheses

45

which explain this phenomenon: changes in geographical distribution of tick species and

46

increased contact of human population with ticks, caused by changes in human life-style

47

(Léger, 2013). Changes in the distribution of tick species are among the major causes for the

48

increase in prevalence of Lyme borreliosis, CCHF, tick-borne encephalitis or other vector-

49

borne infections of humans and domestic animals (Beugnet and Marie, 2009; Petney et al.,

50

2012). Most of the cases of tick species known to have recently increased their geographical

51

range are well documented in Western Europe and USA (Petney et al., 2012). However, there

52

is a lack of knowledge on the possible expansion of ticks with a more eastern distribution in

53

Europe. One of these ticks, Rhipicephalus rossicus, which is reported occasionally from

54

humans, seems to be particularly interesting because of its important demonstrated vectorial

55

role for zoonotic pathogens like Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, or CCHF and West

56

Nile viruses (Walker et al., 2000).

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

34

2

Page 2 of 8

Rhipicephalus rossicus is a tick with Eastern European and Western Asian distribution,

58

considered as being “rare”, with low prevalences in most studies reporting it (Walker et al.,

59

2000). Historically in Romania, it was recorded as an extremely rare tick, found only on

60

small mammals with only 4 known occurrences before 2012 (Feider, 1965; Mihalca et al.,

61

2012). Among domestic animals, dogs are probably the most important hosts, in general, for

62

ticks and tick-borne pathogens of human importance, due to their lifestyle and close contact

63

with people (Chomel, 2011). While R. sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) is typically regarded as the

64

most common tick of dogs worldwide, the related species, R. rossicus is reported only

65

incidentally as a dog ectoparasite (Walker et al., 2000). We present here data which highlight

66

the dominance of R. rossicus in dogs from Romania, with importance to the possible

67

emergence of associated pathogens.

68

A total of 1068 ticks were collected from 84 household dogs between February 2012 and

69

November 2013. The collection occurred in five localities from the Danube Delta, SE

70

Romania (Figure 1), one of the largest wetland complexes of Europe. The region is primarily

71

of rural character, with important urban centers to the south (Constana) and north (Tulcea).

72

Dogs are commonly kept in households, with most individuals freely roaming around the

73

premises. Ticks were identified using morphological keys (Feider, 1965; Walker et al., 2000),

74

while identification was confirmed by molecular diagnostics based on 12S rDNA sequences

75

(Dumitrache et al., 2014). Six species of ticks were identified, with R. rossicus being found in

76

all five locations. Surprisingly, the dominant tick species was not R. sanguineus s.l., but R.

77

rossicus, accounting for 87.1% of all ticks (32.3-95.3% in different locations, see Table 1).

78

Rhipicephalus rossicus had the highest percent of occurrence in dogs in all but one location.

79

Rhipicephalus rossicus is a steppe and mountain steppe tick species, with a distribution from

80

Bulgaria and Romania to the east, occurring primarily in the Eurasian steppe zone to eastern

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

57

3

Page 3 of 8

Kazakhstan and western China. It is a three-host tick, with rodents, leporids and birds hosting

82

immature stages. Hedgehogs, hares, ungulates, horses and occasionally dogs and humans are

83

hosts of adults. All of these hosts are abundantly present in the area of the study. Although

84

previously recorded from dogs, it was primarily considered an important tick of wildlife and

85

domestic ungulates and its vectorial importance was treated as such (Walker et al., 2000). The

86

dominant presence in dogs from SE of Romania rises however a number of questions. Until

87

this study, R. sanguineus s.l. was considered as the only important tick species on dogs in

88

south-temperate regions of Europe (Walker et al., 2000), as well in Romania (Ioniă and

89

Mitrea, 2003). While R. sanguineus s.l. is a well-known vector for a great variety of

90

pathogens, its epidemiological importance for human pathogens is limited (Walker et al.,

91

2000). On the other hand, R. rossicus is a competent vector for CCHF, a disease only recently

92

reported from the study region (Ceianu et al., 2012). Moreover, R. rossicus seems to be more

93

common on humans than R. sanguineus s.l. (Walker et al., 2000), including in Romania

94

(Sándor, unpublished data).

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

81

Ac ce p

95 96 97

Acknowledgements

98

For DMO this paper was supported by POSDRU/159/1.5/S/136893 project. For MAD, SAD

99

and GDA from grant PCE 236/2011. This study was conducted under the frame of the

100

EurNegVec COST Action TD1303. We would like to thank to C. Doma for the map in

101

Figure 1.

102 4

Page 4 of 8

103

References

104 Beugnet, F., Marie, J.L., 2009. Emerging arthropod-borne diseases of companion animals in

106

Europe. Vet. Parasitol. 163, 298–305.

107

Ceianu, C.S., Pănculescu-Gatej, R.I., Coudrier, D., Bouloy, M., 2012. First serologic

108

evidence for the circulation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in Romania. Vector-

109

Borne Zoonotic. 12, 718–721.

110

Chomel, B., 2011. Tick-borne infections in dogs - an emerging infectious threat. Vet.

111

Parasitol. 179, 294–301.

112

Dantas-Torres, F., Chomel, B.B., Otranto, D., 2012. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One

113

Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 28, 437–446.

114

Day, M.J. 2011. One health: the importance of companion animal vector-borne diseases.

115

Parasit Vector. 4,49.

116

Dumitrache, M.O., Kiss, J.B., Dantas-Torres, F., Latrofa, M.S., D’Amico, G., Sándor, A.D.,

117

Mihalca, A.D. 2014. Seasonal dynamics of Rhipicephalus rossicus attacking domestic dogs

118

from the steppic region of southeastern Romania. Parasit Vector 7, 97.

119

Feider, Z., 1965. Fauna of the Popular Republic of Romania. Volume 5/2. Acaromorpha,

120

Suprafamily Ixodoidea [in Romanian]. Ed. Academiei RPR, Bucureşti.

121

Földvári, G., Márialigeti, M., Solymosi, N., Lukács, Z., Majoros, G., Kósa, J.P., Farkas, R.,

122

2007. Hard ticks infesting dogs in Hungary and their infection with Babesia and Borrelia

123

species. Parasitol. Res. 101, 25–34.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

105

5

Page 5 of 8

Ioniă, M., Mitrea, I.L., 2003. [Observations regarding the biological cycle of the brown dog

125

tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus Latreille 1806 – Acari: Ixodidae), in the environmental

126

conditions of Bucureti region]. Scientia Parasitol. 4, 167–171. [in Romanian]

127

Léger, E., Vourc’h, G., Vial, L., Chevillon, C., McCoy, K.D., 2013. Changing distributions of

128

ticks: causes and consequences. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 59, 219–244.

129

Mihalca, A.D., Dumitrache, M.O., Magdaş, C., Gherman, C.M., Domşa, C., Mircean, V.,

130

Ghira, I.V., Pocora, V., Cozma, V., Sándor, A.D., 2012. Synopsis of the hard ticks (Acari:

131

Ixodidae) of Romania with update on host associations and geographical distribution. Exp.

132

Appl. Acarol. 58, 183–206.

133

Petney, T.N., Skuballa, J., Muders, S., Pfäffle, M., Zetlmeisl, C., Oehme, R., 2012. The

134

changing distribution patterns of ticks (Ixodida) in Europe in relation to emerging tick-borne

135

diseases. In: Arthropods as Vectors of Emerging Diseases Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 151–

136

166.

137

Salman, M., Estrada-Peña, A., Tarrés-Call, J. 2013. Emerging (Re-emerging) tick-borne

138

infections and the dissemination of ticks. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases: Geographical

139

Distribution and Control Strategies in the Euro-Asia Region, p.1–5.

140

Smith, F.D., Wall, L.E.R., 2013. Prevalence of Babesia and Anaplasma in ticks infesting dogs

141

in Great Britain. Vet. Parasitol. 198, 18–23.

142

Walker, J.B., Keirans, J.E., Horak, I.G., 2000. The genus Rhipicephalus (Acari: Ixodidae). A

143

guide to the brown ticks of the world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

144

Figure 1. Map of the study region with the tick community structure in dogs.

145

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

124

6

Page 6 of 8

ip t

Table

1068

924

Ixodes ricinus

3 26

1

3 65 29

2 2

2 4

3

1

97

33

7

6

1

us

6 77 6 33 802

Rhipicephalus sanguineus

Hyalomma marginatum

Ixodes crenulatus

3

M

an

12 104 9 102 841

Dermacentor reticulatus

d

84

Rhipicephalus rossicus

ep te

Caraorman Chilia Veche Enisala Grindul Lupilor Iazurile

Total

Ac c

Collection site

Number of sampled dogs 2 64 3 7 8

cr

Table 1. Distribution and number of ticks collected from dogs in the Danube Delta, Romania.

Page 7 of 8

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure

Page 8 of 8