Nuclear Physics A.508 (1990) 305~31Oc North-Holland
305c
SEPARABLE BOUND STATE EQUATIONS FOR THREE RELATIVISTIC FERMIONS.
J. BIJTEBIER(*) Theoretische Natuurkunde, Vrije Universiteit Brussel,
Fakulteit Pleinlaan
der Wetenschappen, 2, 1050 Brussel (Belgium)
Abstr& We describe the bound states of two relativistic fermions plus an external potential and the bound states of three relativistic fermions by sysThe physical requirement of septems of compatible coupled Dirac equations. arability (into two or three independent clusters by “switching off” the corresponding interactions) is satisfied.
1. INTRODUCTION Somewhere quantum which
field
between
theory,
a system
nal field)
to
into two
or more The
body
literature.
N)-body results
last years,
the
The
two
(a more detailed
fermions
plus
quark
external
helium-like
present
fermions
atoms,
potential while
results our
mechanics,
also with
equations.
of these
Onderzoek
navorser
easiest
been
trying
systems
and
for
will be found in refs [l] could
three-fermion
be tested results
treat,
bij het Nationaal
0375-9474 / 90 / $3.50 0 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. worth-Holland)
Fonds voor
interso that
can be found
to combine
to a short
potential
to
equations
and manageable
is devoted
(Belgium).
It
equations
these
two-
of three
(and
presentation the
three
and [2]).
of our fermion Our two-
in the
phenomenology
could
be
used
models.
(*)Bevoegdverklaard
in
an exter-
off” the corresponding the
pairs of coupled
external
presentation
relativistic
(we must be able to split the system
we have
talk
plus
compatibility
of course
separable
quantum
and possibly
by “switching
are
and
Dirac and Klein-Gordon
mutual
and compact
into compatible,
problems the
clusters
separable
equations. for
the
problems
These
equations
of coupled
of separability
independent
compatible,
in the
for a relativistic mutually
simultaneously
two-body
mechanics
is a place
requirement
actions).
quantum
(interacting
by a system
insure
and the physical
several
there
of particles
is described
is difficult
non-relativistic
Wetenschappelijk
to
of build
306~
J. Bijtebier I Separable bound state equations
2. TWO-FERMION SEPARABLE MODELS
We start with a pair of coupled K&Q
i Ki,* = Pf.Yt - mf - “1 *Vt 2
= 0,
and we denote particle
by xi, pi, mf, ytp the position,
i (= 1,2)
respectively.
x1 -x2. pi I p2, yl,
with
general)
the
[<,,
usual
x,,
They
0
to satisfy
built
(weakly
in
2
(2.3)
Pt2 =+ (P, - Pp)
(2.4)
x,2=x,
(2.5)
-x2 0 - H2)
VI2 =5l+v;,
(2.6)
- !32VY2)
(2.7)
(2.1) in the form
0 = (52
in an arbitrary 52(‘402
in order
of the
invariants
di = 70%
0 10 h,2 = TV,
0
1 v12=W,2+~2v,2
0 P12yi2
be chosen
Lorentz
(2.2)
yio 9
Pi =
+H2
we can write
must
mass and rtr matrix
V { 2 are
definitions
1 =5- (9 + 3)
0
momentum,
potentials
condition
+P2
H,2=H,
(2.1)
+ Cf2KT2 = 0.
H tc = di.Pi + 8tmf , F,,=P,
The
y2.
compatibility
KT2] = Ci2Ki2
With the
Dirac equations
+m12v12)*i2
Lorentz
frame.
We shall
(not unitary
= 9) = U&,
0 p12y12
’
= (hY2+
make
in general)
an inversible which
(2.8 a-b)
m12v12)y12
solves
transformation
?-‘t2 =
(2.8b): (2.9a)
Op12yi2
(2.9b)
=O
with
“z,2= v,2 +k(iy2
- Hy2).
From now on, we shall independent
0
on P,~.
restrict
(2.10) ourselves
In this case, U,,
to the models
in which
V,2
and v, 2 are
is given by
U 12 = exp(-ihy2xy2) L(xy2, 0 ;q2q2)
(2.11)
with Z
12
-- eWh~2x~2)
VI 2ew(-ihl
0
2x1
0
2)
(2.12)
J. Bijtebier I Separable
where
we define
(more
generally)
307c
bound state equations
an operator
L(t’,t;z)
in terms
of an operator
z(t)
by + (-i)2;
L(t’,t;z) = 1 + (-i) ; dt, z(t,) The compatibility
condition
[pj12. Fy2 - f-fy2 - ml2 expliciting
the
;’ dt,z(t,)
t
(2.2) written
in terms
of the operator
~,2(‘402)1 = q2C,242W;2
dependence
on
0
assumed
indedpendence
equation
in x,~, we get
0
0
p12
- %2
right-hand
side
- f-f2
(2.14)
could
a priori
as a consequence
p ’,2. Treating
on
= D,2(x;2V;2
reads
(2.14)
as
an
92&2P)1
-
is
in fact
equal
)402 = 0 and
that
have of the
evolution
(2.15) (2.16)
O 0 ; w,$,,). = L(x,~’
for
assume
the potentials
- a1 2z, 2(x;2)
0 D,2(x,2) As ?!,2(O)
of
z,,,
- t-f2 - q24242)1
The
x ,2.
(2.13)
+ . ..
’ but this term does not appear, also a term in P,~,
contained
written
dt2z(t2)
t
I
to V, 2(O), we multiplied
VI 2(O) is hermitian,
see
that
at left by the we
solving functions at xy2 = 0 by 0 x,~ + 0 are then obtained by applying
obtain
this
the
inversible energy
principal
the operator
eq. (2.9a) is simply operator
spectrum
equation.
eq.(2.8a),
D, 2. and
If we
the
wave
The wave functions
at
U, 2.
3. TWO FERMIONS AND AN EXTERNAL POTENTIAL The equations
of two independent
fermions
in an external
potential
are
[pi.Yi - mi - eJi] ‘Z’t2 = 0 where
Ji depends
refers to a given get
compatible
interactions
Xi, pi, c
Lorentz and
by
(we
frame
separable
take a static and energy (which
independent
we can call the laboratory
equations
combining
the
potential)
frame).
mutual
and
-
BJ,~I+,~
= 0
external
(3.2a) (3.2b)
= 0
with Y ,2 = U,2?,2,
J,2 = P,J,
+ P2J2v
U,,
= exp ( -i WY2 + ej,2)x~2)Ux~2p
j,, =i(P,J,
- P2J2).
0 ; q2q2)
and
We can
writing
0 0 IPi 2 - f% 2 - ~,2V,2~O)
0 D12(x12)
p;2+,2
on
(3.1)
(3.3)
(3.4)
308c
J. Bijtebier I Separable
The system
(3.2)
(separability). obtained
is equivalent
An
infinity
by introducing
to (2.1)
of other
arbitrary
bound state equations
when
e = 0 and to (3.1)
compatible
and
x:2-independent
separable
when
systems
and eo, 2-proportional
o12
= 0
could
be
operators
into (3.2a) and (3.3). 4. THREE FERMIONS We can equations,
obtain built
two-fermion
a system
with
the
models,
of three
mutual
and
given
separable
by three
coupled
(different
GJ +
(4.la)
Op,2Y=p;3;Y=p;,+=o for G = Y(xi quantities The
refer
Pp2 replaced interact
(4.1 b)
= 0), with P = p, + p2 + p3, n,ow to the total
potential
center
Vt 2 is the potential
by PO - Hi
with the two
that eq. (4.la) evident.
The
splitting
(to which
others).
contains
example),
Dirac
or identical)
by writing
I\ I\ 0 +o,~V,~+~~V~~+W~,
OP y=[H
compatible
interactions
can
the system
non-covariant
of mass frame.
it is equiva;ent
(1,2)
whet
demonstrated
into the two clusters
model,
two-fermion the third
V23 and V3,
time or energy. be
The
fermion
are defined
with
does
not
similarly,
so
The compatibility
of eqs. (4.1) is
by
= 03,
making
(1,2) + (3).
~2~
= 0 (for
Eqs. (4.1) become (4.2a)
(P;2+
pi)+
OP,zY
= 0,
(4.2b)
0 (P,2
- 2p,o,G = 0.
(4.2~)
We should
= (H;2 + o,$,~
+ Hz + Hi.
V, 2(O) of the
The potentials
no relative
separability
Ho = H;
have a non-zero
+ Hi)+,
term in the right-hand
eqs. (a) and (c) into an equation The
fermion.
brings
the
equations
desired*
i 0 U31=exp[~(H,2+~,2
the
to
commut!s use of Vii
(4.3) and combining
P;2k,2
= (H;2 + a, $,&
p;2;i’,,
= 0
2
C ,2-2Hi)(xy+$
without (4.2c), 0 0 0 with x, + x2 - 2x3.
modification
(note that V,2
for V, 2(O), whence transformation
(1,2) and an equation
for the third
transformation
,
$=U3’%,2
for the system
side of (4.2~) in order to combine
instead
of Vij(O)
eqs. (a) and
in
-2x$]
(4.3)
modifying
the
This would
not be the case
(4.la)).
two
other
Performing
(c) we obtain (4.4a) (4.4b)
the
309c
J. Bijtebier I Separable bound staie equations
p&2 =H ;%,2.
(4.4c)
Eq. (4.4~) is the equation Vt 2(O), using system
(4.4c).
studied
of a free fermion. The
in section
system
In eq. (4.4a),
(4.4a,b)
The
2.
U, 2 g iven by (2.11).
transformation
h VI2
is then
equations
equivalent
for T1 2 are
can be replaced to the
obtained
by
using
(4.5)
we have
to consider
like to find an operator coupling
constants
also the two
which
U-’
extrapolates
differ from zero.
other
two-cluster
the three
limits
U k ‘Ui”j’
and we would when
all three
We can choose
$ = u-‘y u-l
the
At the ~23 = w3,= 0 limit, we have thus
Y = u &-;Y,2. However,
by
two-fermion
(4.6)
=u;‘u;~+u;‘u;,1+u;‘u;~
as each Uk’U
-2lJ;’
i-i’ depends
(4.7)
only on Oii while U o’
IS their
common
no-interaction
limit: -I 2i 0 0 UO = exp 1T(ht2xt2 Once
again,
the
’ * + h~,x~,)]. + h22x22
solution
given
in this
(4.8)
section
to
the
compatibility-separability
puzzle is by no means unique. 5. CHOICE OF THE TWO-FERMION MODELS. In section
2, the
to technical and V,2(0) others Some
choice
restrictions: must
potentials
be hermitian.
must be transformed models
of the starting
the
This
before
can be used directly,
has been
submitted
V, 2 and v, 2 must be independent
two-fermion
on p y2
excludes
some
models possible
use (as the very general as the harmonic
oscillator
models, model model,
while
some
of Sazdjian given
with
1 Vf2 = iy,.(xt2)~,2y,5y25,
“12 = -iy2.(x1 2)P t2Yi 5y25’ (x12)p,, The potential
= x12 - [P:2ii(x12.P12) of the principal
Pt*.
equation
[3]).
by (2.1)
(5.1) (5.2)
is then
(5.3)
31oc
J. Bijtebier
In the two-fermion (1,2) center
P,*
of mass frame where
&2)P,,
bound state equations
can be diagonalized,
the
little
function
(in this case
components
harmonic
of
identical
the
oscillator
two-fermions
work in a “laboratory
plus
spinors
equation
potential
frame”.
are
for
= x,2
In the three
2
+ UP,21
fermion
model,
We use 0
052)p,*(O)
the
model,
2
-p,21
only
V,2(0) -1
can be computed
eliminated,
we
get
“internal”
part
of
exactly: a
three-
the
wave
@12)P,,
no component
If we take x12,
the
and
separable
interactions) are
side
This the
(we
- P8m3)2
two-body free
but not separable
into
non-local
of (5.5)
meets
get
not a specific be solved
right-hand
as in (5.4).
hamiltonians
globally
d3.P3
+ 1 (PO-
= xl2
relativistic
complication,
of P12 can bf P = 0. 2
and we
with
-1
p,21 &J,2P,2'
-
or (5.6)
at order
practice
interaction
terms.
Dirac
diagonalized,
We useV, 2 built
equations
arbitrary
zero
of simply Such
if
clusters.
we
a model
switch
x12-only
we find the
equations
[I]
Preprint
VUB/TENA/89/01.
Submitted
to II Nuovo
Cimento
A.
[2]
Preprint
VUB/TENA/89/02.
Submitted
to II Nuovo
Cimento
A.
Dirac
would
off
all
must
be
three
of (5.5)
as perturbations.
REFERENCES.
Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3401.
in P,, adding
The last terms
to be treated
the simpler
(5.6)
by perturbations.
[3] H. SAZDJIAN:
and we
(5.5)
the usual
corrections, as even
P!2 can be diagonalized
built with
(x,p,2P,,.
work in the total center of mass frame where
(5.6)
to (2.15))
[l].
In the
free
in the
(5.4)
of (2.8a)
dimensional
simply
so that we can work
P,2 = 0 and
= X12.
The solutions when
model,
I Separable
and
This
is
already