Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances in sequencing batch reactor

Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances in sequencing batch reactor

Journal Pre-proof Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances in s...

5MB Sizes 1 Downloads 48 Views

Journal Pre-proof Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances in sequencing batch reactor Sen Wang, Mengchun Gao, Bingrui Ma, Min Xi, Fanlong Kong PII:

S0269-7491(19)33916-8

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113596

Reference:

ENPO 113596

To appear in:

Environmental Pollution

Received Date: 19 July 2019 Revised Date:

1 November 2019

Accepted Date: 7 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Wang, S., Gao, M., Ma, B., Xi, M., Kong, F., Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances in sequencing batch reactor, Environmental Pollution (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envpol.2019.113596. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

SBR Reactors

SBR Performance

Overflow port

Influent

Influence

microbial activity

Effluent

SOUR, SAOR, SNOR, SNIRR, SNRR, SPUR and SPRR

Air diffuser

Magnetic followers

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

ZnO NPs with different size

microbial enzymatic activities DHA, AMO, NOR, NR, NIR, PPX and PPK.

Decrease the COD, N and P removal

Production and components of EPS

1

Size-dependent effects of ZnO nanoparticles on performance,

2

microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric

3

substances in sequencing batch reactor

4

Sen Wanga *, Mengchun Gaob, Bingrui Mab, Min Xia, Fanlong Konga

5 6

a. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao

7

266071, China

8

b. Key Lab of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean

9

University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

10 11

*Corresponding author.

12

Address: College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qingdao University of

13

China, No. 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266071, China.

14

Tel: +86 532 85953244; Fax: +86 532 85953244

15

E-mail: [email protected] (Sen Wang)

16

1

17

Abstract

18

ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) have been detected in various wastewater treatment

19

plants. It is widely assumed that size has a crucial effect on the NPs toxicity. Concerns

20

have been raised over probable size-dependent toxicity of ZnO NPs to activated

21

sludge, which could eventually affect the treatment efficiencies of wastewater

22

treatment facilities. The size-dependent influences of ZnO NPs on performance,

23

microbial activities, and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from activated

24

sludge were examined in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) in present study. Three

25

different sizes (15, 50, and 90 nm) and five concentrations (2, 5, 10, 30, and 60 mg

26

L‒1) were trialled. The inhibitions on COD and nitrogen removal were determined by

27

the particle size, and smaller ZnO NPs (15 nm) showed higher inhibition effect than

28

those of 50 and 90 nm, whereas the ZnO NPs with size of 50 nm showed maximum

29

inhibition effect on phosphorus removal among three sizes of ZnO NPs. After

30

exposure to different sized ZnO NPs, microbial enzymatic activities and removal rates

31

of activated sludge represented the same trend, consistent with the nitrogen and

32

phosphorus

33

concentration-dependent effects on EPS contents and components were also observed.

34

Compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, 60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs with sizes of 15, 50,

35

and 90 nm increased the EPS contents from 92.5, 92.4, and 92.0 mg g‒1 VSS to 277.5,

36

196.8, and 178.2 mg g‒1 VSS (p < 0.05), respectively. The protein and polysaccharide

37

contents increased with the decreasing particle sizes and increasing ZnO NPs

38

concentrations, and the content of protein was always higher than that of

removal

efficiency.

In

2

addition,

apparent

size-

and

39

polysaccharide.

40

Keywords: ZnO nanoparticles; Size-dependent effect; Microbial enzymatic activity;

41

Extracellular polymeric substances.

42

Capsule: :ZnO NPs exhibited size-dependent effects on the inhibition on COD and

43

nitrogen removal, as well as the production of EPS.

44

3

45

1. Introduction

46

ZnO NPs are increasingly applied to cosmetics, paints, textiles, and plastics due to

47

their specific physicochemical properties (Ma et al., 2013a). The increasing

48

application of ZnO NPs-containing products inevitably led to their release into water

49

environment (Gottschalk et al., 2009). Recently, ZnO NPs were detected in some

50

wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and large proportion were adsorbed onto

51

activated sludge in conventional biotreatment system (Kaegi et al., 2011). Previous

52

toxicological studies indicated that ZnO NPs had antibacterial abilities (Lallo da Silva

53

et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2013a). Concerns have therefore been raised over the probable

54

impacts of ZnO NPs on activated sludge containing various species of

55

microorganisms, which could eventually affect the treatment efficiencies of WWTPs.

56

Recent studies found that ZnO NPs could decrease microbial population, disturb

57

microbial diversity, and lead to a reduction in treatment efficiency of biotreatment

58

systems (Cheng et al., 2019; Zhang, et al., 2017). ZnO NPs had toxic effect on

59

nitrifying

60

ammonia-oxidizing bacteria was 13.1 mg Zn L‒1 (Liu et al., 2011). Exposure to 5 mg

61

L‒1 ZnO NPs slightly restrained the removal of COD and NH4+-N in SBR (Hou et al.,

62

2013), whereas significantly changed functional bacterial community (Chen et al.,

63

2014). High concentration ZnO NPs (20 and 50 mg L‒1) were proved to have

64

considerable negative impacts on nitrifying bacteria community of SBR (Wang et al.,

65

2015).

66

bacteria,

and

the

half

maximal

inhibitory

concentration

for

As a crucial material characteristic of NPs, particle size was one of the main 4

67

factors affecting their reactivity and cytotoxicity. The smaller NPs may exhibit greater

68

toxicity than the larger ones of the same substance due to their larger surface area per

69

unit of volume, high particle number-to-mass ratio, superior surface reactivity, and

70

easier penetration into cells (Elder et al., 2009; Sharifi et al., 2012). There were a few

71

comparative studies on the size-dependent effects of different NPs, such as Ag, Au,

72

CuO, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, Si and TiO2, on various cell lines (Carlson et al., 2008; Cui, et al.,

73

2017; Karlsson et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012; Li et al., 2018). For ZnO NPs, its

74

antibacterial activities increased with the decreasing particle sizes (Chen et al., 2019;

75

Lallo da Silva et al., 2019; Padmavathy and Vijayaraghavan, 2008; Raghupathi et al.,

76

2011). ZnO<50 nm induced more toxicity on Daphnia magna than ZnO<100 nm,

77

with the EC50 of 3.1 and 1.9 mg L‒1, respectively (Santo et al., 2014). Wei et al. (2019)

78

observed that the binding of ZnO NPs onto the hydrophilic sludge EPS increased with

79

reducing ZnO NPs diameter from 50 nm to 30 nm, while the adsorption of the

80

hydrophobic sludge EPS declined with the increasing ZnO NPs diameter from 50 nm

81

to 100 nm. However, the size-dependent influence of ZnO NPs on performance and

82

microbial activity of SBR are still not clear.

83

The aims of this paper were to (a) examine the size-dependent influence of ZnO

84

NPs on performance, microbial activity and enzymatic activity of SBR; (b) research

85

the possible impacts of ZnO NPs size on production and component of EPS; and (c)

86

explore the potential size-dependent toxicity mechanisms of ZnO NPs.

5

87

2. Materials and methods

88

2.1. ZnO NPs and wastewater

89

The ZnO NPs of 15 nm (ZnO NPs-15) was obtained from Nanjing Emperor

90

Nanomaterials Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). The ZnO NPs of 50 nm (ZnO NPs-50) and

91

90 nm (ZnO NPs-90) were obtained from Hangzhou Wanjing New Material Co., Ltd.

92

(Zhejiang, China). To prepare 0.5 g L‒1 stock suspensions, 0.5 g ZnO NPs was

93

dispersed in 1.0 L Milli-Q water by sonicating at 25 °C (1h, 250 W, 40 kHz) (Zheng et

94

al., 2011). The effective diameters and size distributions of ZnO NPs were examined

95

via TEM (JEM 1200-EX, JEOL Ltd., Japan). The average particle sizes in stock

96

suspension were detected by dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern

97

Instruments, UK).

98

The influent synthetic wastewater to SBRs comprised NaAc, NH4Cl, KH2PO4,

99

and K2HPO4, which were added into tap water daily. The characteristics of

100

wastewater were as follows: COD of 419±8 mg L‒1, NH4+‒N of 26.3±1.0 mg L‒1 and

101

soluble ortho-phosphorus (SOP) of 11.3±0.9 mg L‒1. The detailed composition of the

102

wastewater was described in the literature of Wang et al. (2016).

103

2.2. SBR set-up and operation

104

Three identical SBRs were used in this experiment. The SBR (effective volume,

105

7.7 L) was operated three cycles every day at 20‒30 °C. Each cycle contained: (i) 6

106

min influent feeding; (ii) 144-min anaerobic stage; (iii)) 240-min aerobic stage; (iv)

107

78 min settling stage; and (v) 12 min decanting stage. Except for the settling and

108

decanting periods, the SBR was constantly mixed using a magnetic stirring apparatus 6

109

((IKA RH basic 2, Staufen, Germany). The dissolved oxygen concentration level in

110

anoxic and aerobic phases were maintained less than 0.5 mg L‒1and over 2 mg L‒1,

111

respectively.

112

All SBRs were carried out with the return sludge from the secondary settling pond

113

in Licunhe WWTP (Qingdao, China) as seed sludge. The mixed liquor suspended

114

solids (MLSS) of SBRs in the beginning varied from 3300 to 3500 mg L‒1.

115

2.3. Analytical methods

116

COD, SOP, NH4+-N, NO2‒-N, NO3‒-N, and MLSS were performed following the

117

standard methods (Chinese SEPA., 2002). The EPS was collected according to the

118

method of Wang et al. (2013). The main components of EPS, such as protein (PN) and

119

polysaccharide (PS), were detected with modified Lowry method (using bovine serum

120

albumin for standard) and anthrone-sulfuric acid method (using glucose for standard),

121

respectively. The specific microbial activities of activated sludge including the

122

oxygen-utilizing rate (SOUR), ammonium-oxidizing rate (SAOR), nitrate-reducing

123

rate (SNRR), nitrite-oxidizing rate (SNOR), nitrite-reducing rate (SNIRR),

124

phosphorus uptaking rate (SPUR), phosphorus releasing rate (SPRR), and some key

125

enzymes activities including dehydrogenase (DHA), nitrate reductase (NR), ammonia

126

monooxygenase (AMO), nitrite reductase (NIR), nitrite oxidoreductase (NOR),

127

polyphosphate kinase (PPK) and exopolyphosphatase (PPX) were conducted in

128

accordance with the Text S1-S3 of Supplementary data.

129

2.4. Statistical analysis

130

Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA and LSD tests) was performed through the 7

131

IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 (IBM, USA) to evaluate the differences before and after

132

adding ZnO NPs. The difference was statistically significant at p < 0.05.

133

3. Results and discussion

134

3.1. Characterization of ZnO NPs

135

The ZnO NPs sizes (15, 50, and 90 nm) were measured as 18.3±5.2, 42.5±12.5,

136

and 99.1±22.3 nm by observing more than 200 particles randomly (Fig. 1). From

137

TEM images, ZnO NPs-15 and ZnO NPs-50 had an irregular spherical shape, while

138

ZnO NPs-90 showed a columnar shape. Homogeneous and narrow size distributions

139

were verified for three types of ZnO nanoparticles. The median values (first and third

140

quartile values, in brackets) were 17.2 nm (15.2 and 19.9 nm), 41.5 nm (34.3 and 49.6

141

nm) and 95.2 nm (85.2 and 110.9 nm) for ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90,

142

respectively. From the results of the dynamic light scattering, the average diameters of

143

different sized ZnO NPs (15, 50, and 90 nm) in the stock suspensions were 538.3,

144

640.6, and 829.1 nm, respectively.

145

3.2. Size-dependent effects of ZnO NPs on SBR performance

146

Table S1 summarizes the variations of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus removals

147

exposed to ZnO NPs with different sizes and concentrations (2-60 mg L‒1). The COD

148

removal efficiencies had no significant change at low concentration ZnO NPs (2 and 5

149

mg L‒1). The reason might be heterotrophic bacteria adapted to the low concentration

150

ZnO NPs after long-term exposure (about 112 d) (Tan et al., 2015), indicating ZnO

151

NPs with environmentally relevant concentration would not affect COD removal in

152

SBR. This result corroborated the studies that 5 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs did not significantly 8

153

impact COD removal (Hou et al., 2013). When ZnO NPs concentration varied

154

between 10 and 60 mg L‒1, the apparent size- and concentration-dependent effects on

155

COD removal were observed. Compared to the absence of ZnO NPs, the average

156

COD removal efficiencies decreased about 4.7% for ZnO NPs-15, 3.1% for ZnO

157

NPs-50, and 2.3% for ZnO NPs-90 respectively, showing that the smaller ZnO NPs

158

had greater inhibition on COD removal.

159

The average NH4+-N removal efficiencies changed slightly at 0-10 mg L‒1 ZnO

160

NPs, ranged between 99% and 100%. In contrast to this result, it was reported that the

161

NH4+-N removal efficiencies were inhibited by 1 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs (over 62 d) or 5

162

mg L‒1 ZnO NPs (11 d) (Hou et al., 2013; Puay et al., 2015). The contradiction might

163

be caused by the different experimental conditions, such as exposure time or

164

wastewater used in the experiment. The NH4+-N removal efficiencies reduced

165

gradually as ZnO NPs concentrations were over 10 mg L‒1. The average NH4+-N

166

removal efficiencies exposure to 30 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs reduced about 1.1% for ZnO

167

NPs-15, 0.7% for ZnO NPs-50, and 0.5% for ZnO NPs-90 compared with the absence

168

of

169

average removal efficiencies decreased about 2.5% for ZnO NPs-15, 1.6% for ZnO

170

NPs-50 and 1.0% for ZnO NPs-90, respectively. Similarly, Wang et al. (2015)

171

reported nitrogen removal was not influenced by 10 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs, while NH4+-N

172

removal efficiencies respectively reduced about 75.7% and 100% after exposing to 20

173

and 50 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs for 5 d. Compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, ZnO

174

NPs-50 might produce slightly more inhibitory effects on the NO2--N oxidation

ZnO NPs, respectively. As ZnO NPs concentration reached 60 mg L‒1, the

9

175

during the nitrifying process or NO2--N reduction during the denitrifying process than

176

ZnO NPs-15 and ZnO NPs-90. The effluent NO3‒-N concentrations slightly increased

177

at low ZnO NPs concentration (0-5 mg L‒1), and then increased significantly as

178

increasing ZnO NPs concentrations. Size-dependent effect became significant at 60

179

mg L‒1 ZnO NPs. The effluent NO3‒-N concentrations increased about 17.4% for ZnO

180

NPs-15, 13.8% for ZnO NPs-50 and 12.8% for ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs

181

compared with the absence of ZnO NPs. The above inhibition effects on nitrification

182

and denitrification of ZnO NPs agreed with the conclusion of Zheng et al. (2011),

183

which showed that NH4+-N removal wasn't obviously affected by ZnO NPs (1, 10 and

184

50 mg L‒1), but total nitrogen removal efficiencies declined from 81.5% (without

185

adding ZnO NPs) to 75.6% (10 mg L‒1) and 70.8% (50 mg L‒1).

186

The SOP removal efficiencies showed a slight increase trend after exposure to 2

187

and 5 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs. Compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, ZnO NPs-15, ZnO

188

NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 5 mg L‒1 increased the SOP removal efficiencies about

189

4.8%, 7.0% and 6.2%, respectively. Tan et al. (2015) found that 10 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs

190

increased the removal of phosphate in a membrane bioreactor, which was due to the

191

reaction between ZnO NPs and phosphate resulted in the formation of zinc-phosphate

192

and other larger phosphate complex substances (Qiu and Ting, 2014). However, a

193

relatively obvious decrease was observed when ZnO NPs concentration increased

194

from 10 to 60 mg L‒1 (Table S1). The average SOP removal efficiencies exposure to

195

60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs respectively decreased about 8.8% for ZnO NPs-15, 9.5% for

196

ZnO NPs-50, and 6.4% for ZnO NPs-90 compared with the absence of ZnO NPs. This 10

197

agreed with a report where the phosphate release, uptake and removal were inhibited

198

by 10 and 50 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs (Zheng et al., 2011).

199

3.3. Toxicity of ZnO NPs on microbial activities

200

Fig. 2 presents the changes of SOUR after exposure to ZnO NPs with different

201

sizes and concentrations. The SOUR values had no obvious changes at low

202

concentration ZnO NPs (0-5 mg L‒1). As ZnO NPs concentration was over 5 mg L‒1,

203

the SOUR value decreased gradually (p < 0.05), indicating high concentrations of

204

ZnO NPs might suppress the respiration and growth of heterotrophic microorganism.

205

Compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, the SOUR exposure to 60 mg L‒1 reduced

206

about 20.0% for ZnO NPs-15, 14.4% for ZnO NPs-50, and 12.4% for ZnO NPs-90,

207

respectively. It was apparent tshat small sized ZnO NPs had stronger inhibition on

208

SOUR than the larger ones, consistent with the inhibition effects on COD removal. It

209

was probably attributed to the fact that as the particles’ size decreased, the surface

210

area exponentially increased and a greater proportion of the particles contacted with

211

microbial cells (Scown et al., 2010; Sharifi et al., 2012). Sibag et al. (2015) found

212

small silica NPs could be stronger inhibitor to the oxygen uptake of activated sludge

213

than larger ones.

214

The SAOR did not change obviously at 0-5 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs, whereas declined as

215

the increasing ZnO NPs concentrations (Fig. 3a). ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO

216

NPs-90 respectively reduced the SAOR about 32.6%, 27.5%, and 24.9% (p < 0.05)

217

when ZnO NPs concentration reached 60 mg L‒1. Three different sized ZnO NPs

218

inhibited the SNOR and SNIRR in a concentration and size-dependent manner (p < 11

219

0.05) (Fig. 3b and c). ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1

220

respectively reduced the SNOR about 31.9%, 30.2%, and 29.2%, and SNIRR about

221

37.1%, 36.8%, and 33.7% compared with the absence of ZnO NPs. The SNRR

222

increased slightly at 0-5 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs, whereas decreased at higher concentration

223

ZnO NPs (30 and 60 mg L‒1) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3d). ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and

224

ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1 respectively reduced SNRR about 20.2%, 17.0%, and

225

14.6% compared with the absence of ZnO NPs (p < 0.05). It was apparent that ZnO

226

NPs-15 showed more inhibition effects on SAOR, SNOR, SNIRR and SNRR than

227

ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90.

228

The SPUR and SPRR show obvious decrease at 10-60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs (p < 0.05)

229

(Fig. 3e and f). ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1 respectively

230

reduced the SPUR about 30.7%, 35.1%, and 27.6%, and the SPRR about 17.5%,

231

24.6%, and 15.1% compared with the absence of ZnO NPs,. In contrast to the

232

inhibition effect on COD and nitrogen removal, the ZnO NPs-50 showed more

233

inhibition effects on phosphorus removal than ZnO NPs-15 and ZnO NPs-90.

234

ZnO NPs showed size-dependent effects on microbial activities, such as SOUR,

235

SAOR, SNRR, SNOR, SNIRR, SPUR, and SPRR, due to the fact that smaller NPs

236

possessed higher specific surface area and number of individual NPs could contact

237

with microbial cells (Kyung et al., 2009; Napierska et al., 2009; Scown et al., 2010).

238

Padmavathy and Vijayaraghavan (2008) have demonstrated that the higher toxicity of

239

smaller ZnO NPs was because that more NPs were adsorbed on the cells surface and

240

formed abundant reactive oxygen species. The Zn2+ dissolution from ZnO NPs has 12

241

been reported as size dependent (Pasquet et al, 2014b), which also contributed to the

242

antimicrobial activity (Pasquet et al, 2015). Besides, the smaller NPs can penetrate the

243

bacterial membrane more easily due to their high interfacial area (Kim et al., 2010;

244

Sirelkhatim et al., 2015). Thus, the smaller ZnO NPs possessed higher antimicrobial

245

activity than the larger ones (Lallo da Silva et al., 2019; Pasquet et al., 2014a;

246

Raghupathi et al., 2011), resulting in more obvious decrease in microbial activities.

247

3.4. Effects of ZnO NPs on microbial enzymatic activities

248

The biological removal of organic compounds, nitrogen and phosphorus is

249

associated with some enzymatic activities. DHA is often applied to assess microbial

250

activity in degrading organic compounds (Yang et al., 2002). As shown in Fig. 4,

251

DHA changed slightly at less than 5 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs; above this concentration, it

252

decreased gradually (p < 0.05). The DHA exposure to 60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs-15, ZnO

253

NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 decreased about 24.4%, 17.4%, and 15.3% compared with

254

the absence of ZnO NPs, respectively. This agreed with the variation of SOUR (Fig.

255

2). The above results indicated that ZnO NPs-15 showed more significant inhibition

256

on COD removal than ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90.

257

The activities of AMO, NIR, NR, and NOR corresponded to the SAOR, SNIRR,

258

SNRR, and SNOR, indicating the abilities of activated sludge on nitrogen

259

transformation. As ZnO NPs concentration reached 10-60 mg L‒1, three sized ZnO

260

NPs obviously inhibited AMO activity (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5a). Compared with the

261

absence of ZnO NPs, ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 with concentration

262

of 60 mg L‒1 reduced the AMO activity about 25.4%, 21.8%, and 19.3%, respectively. 13

263

The activities of NOR and NIR decreased gradually at 5-60 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs (p <

264

0.05) (Fig. 5b and c). Compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, ZnO NPs-15, ZnO

265

NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1 reduced the NOR activity about 28.9%, 20.3%,

266

and 15.9%, and the NIR activity about 30.6%, 29.2%, and 23.4%, respectively. The

267

activities of NR increased slightly at low ZnO NPs concentration (0-5 mg L‒1) (p <

268

0.05), while decreased obviously at 30 and 60 mg L‒1 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5d). ZnO

269

NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1 reduced NR activity about

270

12.4%, 7.5%, and 6.0% compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, respectively.

271

Apparently, the smaller sized ZnO NPs (15 nm) showed more inhibition effects on

272

enzymatic activities relevant to nitrogen removal than the bigger ones (50 and 90 nm).

273

ZnO NPs with size of less than 100 nm (20 and 50 mg L‒1) was proved to significant

274

inhibit the AMO and NOR activities (Wang et al., 2015). Nevertheless, Zheng et al.

275

(2011) declared 10 and 50 mg L‒1 ZnO NPs decreased NR activity, but did not

276

apparently affect the AMO, NOR, and NIR activities after short time exposure. These

277

results demonstrated that the ZnO NPs-15 was more toxic on nitrogen removal than

278

ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90.

279

The PPK and PPX activities, corresponding to SPUR and SPRR respectively,

280

indicated the biological phosphorus removal capability (Lee et al., 2006). Fig. 5e and f

281

show that the PPK and PPX activities had slightly changes at low ZnO NPs

282

concentration (0-10 mg L‒1), and then declined obviously as increasing ZnO NPs

283

concentrations (p < 0.05). ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1

284

reduced PPX activity by 15.7%, 22.7%, and 14.5%, and PPK activity by 9.3%, 12.8%, 14

285

and 8.6% compared with the absence of ZnO NPs, respectively. Similarly, it was

286

reported that PPK and PPX activities in activated sludge were inhibited by 10 or 50

287

mg L‒1 ZnO NPs in SBR (Zheng et al., 2011). In this study, ZnO NPs-50 inhibited

288

PPX and PPK activities more obvious than ZnO NPs-15 and ZnO NPs-90, which

289

agreed with the changes of SPUR and SPRR (Fig. 3e and f), and the effluent

290

concentrations of SOP (Table S1).

291

3.5. Effect of ZnO NPs on EPS production and components

292

EPS, as the main constituent of activated sludge, exert critical roles in protecting

293

microbial cells from the toxic substance (Sheng et al., 2010). Thus, the influences of

294

ZnO NPs on EPS were investigated. EPS production increased in a size- and

295

concentration-dependent manner after exposure to ZnO NPs (Fig. 6a). Compared with

296

the absence of ZnO NPs, ZnO NPs-15, ZnO NPs-50, and ZnO NPs-90 at 60 mg L‒1

297

increased the EPS contents from 92.5, 92.4, and 92.0 mg g-1 VSS to 277.5, 196.8, and

298

178.2 mg g-1 VSS (p < 0.05), respectively. EPS can trap and reduce the NPs toxicity

299

to protect the cells (Kiser et al., 2010), so the microorganisms which produced more

300

EPS exhibited better tolerability to NPs (Sheng and Liu, 2011). These microorganisms

301

became predominant in SBR after exposing to ZnO NPs, which then led to the

302

increasing EPS content.

303

EPS mainly consists of PS, PN, and a little nucleic acids and lipids. In order to

304

examine the influences of different sized ZnO NPs on EPS production, the variations

305

of PS and PN contents were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 6b-d, the PS and PN contents

306

significantly increased with the increasing concentration (5-60 mg L‒1) as well as the 15

307

decreasing size of ZnO NPs (p < 0.05). The PN was the dominant component in EPS,

308

which was always more than the PS content. The PN and PS contents exposed to ZnO

309

NPs-15 increased more significantly than those of ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90.

310

The smaller ZnO NPs showed more toxic than the larger ones because of the

311

larger surface area per volume, so the activated sludge exposed to ZnO NPs-15

312

produced more EPS to prevent the microorganisms within activated sludge from the

313

toxic effects of the incoming ZnO NPs. The increasing EPS (especially PS) could

314

accelerate the aggregation of NPs enlarging their hydrodynamic diameter (Ma et al.,

315

2013b), which would decrease the toxicity of NPs (Choi and Hu, 2008). Pletikapić et

316

al. (2012) found that after exposure to Ag NPs, silicified marine diatoms produced

317

amounts of EPS to trap the Ag NPs, and thus prevented the NPs from contacting and

318

damaging the cells.

319

4. Conclusion

320

The ZnO NPs showed size- and concentration-dependent effects on COD, and

321

nitrogen removal, and EPS contents. The removal efficiencies of COD, nitrogen, and

322

phosphorus had no obvious changes at lower ZnO NPs, while had obvious decrease as

323

ZnO NPs concentration was above 10 mg L‒1. The ZnO NPs-15 inhibited COD and

324

nitrogen removal more obviously than those of ZnO NPs-50 and ZnO NPs-90,

325

whereas ZnO NPs-50 showed more inhibition effects on phosphorus removal. The

326

smaller ZnO NPs produced more EPS to reduce NPs toxicity than ZnO NPs-50 and

327

ZnO NPs-90.

16

328

Acknowledgements

329

This project was supported by A Project of Shandong Province Higher

330

Educational Science and Technology Program (No. J18KA108) and Shandong

331

Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2019MD042).

332 333

Abbreviation Abbreviation

Full name

AMO DHA EPS MLSS NIR NOR NPs NR PN PPK PPX PS SAOR SBR SNIRR SNOR SNRR SOP SOUR SPRR SPUR WWTPs SOUR SPRR SPUR WWTPs

Ammonia monooxygenase Dehydrogenase Extracellular polymeric substances Mixed liquor suspended solids Nitrite reductase Nitrite oxidoreductase Nanoparticles Nitrate reductase Protein Polyphosphate kinase Exopolyphosphatase Polysaccharide Specific ammonium-oxidizing rate Sequencing batch reactor Specific nitrite-reducing rate Specific nitrite-oxidizing rate Specific nitrate-reducing rate Soluble ortho-phosphorus Specific oxygen-utilizing rate Specific phosphorus releasing rate Specific phosphorus uptaking rate Wastewater treatment plants Specific oxygen-utilizing rate Specific phosphorus releasing rate Specific phosphorus uptaking rate Wastewater treatment plants

334

17

335

References

336

Carlson, C., Hussain, S.M., Schrand, A.M., K. Braydich-Stolle, L., Hess, K.L., Jones,

337

R.L., Schlager, J.J., 2008. Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles:

338

size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. J. Phys. Chem. B. 112,

339

13608–13619.

340

Chen, J., Tang, Y. Q., Li, Y., Nie, Y., Hou, L., Li, X.Q., Wu, X.L., 2014. Impacts of

341

different nanoparticles on functional bacterial community in activated sludge.

342

Chemosphere 104, 141–148.

343

Chen, P.Y., Wang, H., He, M., Chen, B.B., Yang, B., Hu, B., 2019. Size-dependent

344

cytotoxicity study of ZnO nanoparticles in HepG2 cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

345

171, 337–346.

346

Cheng, Y.F., Zhang, Z.Z., Li, G.F., Zhu, B.Q., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y.Y., Zhu, W.Q., Fan,

347

N.S., Jin, R.C., 2019. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on high-rate denitrifying

348

granular sludge and the role of phosphate in toxicity attenuation. Environ. Pollut.

349

251, 166–174.

350 351

Chinese SEPA, 2002. Water and Wastewater Monitoring Methods, fourth ed. Chinese Environmental Science Publishing Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

352

Choi, O., Hu, Z.Q., 2008. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related

353

nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 4583–4588.

354

Cui, J.H., Liu, T.X., Li, F.B., Yi, J.C., Liu, C.P., Yu, H.Y., 2017. Silica nanoparticles

355

alleviate cadmium toxicity in rice cells: Mechanisms and size effects. Environ.

356

Pollut. 228, 363–369. 18

357

Elder, A., Vidyasagar, S., DeLouise, L., 2009. Physicochemical factors that affect

358

metal and metal oxide nanoparticle passage across epithelial barriers. Wiley.

359

Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 1, 434–450.

360

Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R.W., Nowack, B., 2009. Modeled environmental

361

concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for

362

different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 9216–9222.

363

Hou, L.L., Xia, J., Li, K.Y., Chen, J., Wu, X.L., Li, X.Q., 2013. Removal of ZnO

364

nanoparticles in simulated wastewater treatment processes and its effects on COD

365

and NH4+-N reduction. Water. Sci. Technol. 67, 254–260.

366

Kaegi, R., Vonbank, A., Sinnet, B., Zuleeg, S., Hagendorfer, H., Burkhardt, M.,

367

Siegrist, H., 2011. Behaviour of metallic silver nanoparticles in a pilot wastewater

368

treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3902–3908.

369

Karlsson, H.L., Gustafsson, J., Cronholm, P., Möller, L., 2009. Size-dependent

370

toxicity of metal oxide particles‒A comparison between nano-and micrometer size.

371

Toxicol. Lett. 188, 112–118.

372

Kim, K.T., Klaine, S.J., Cho, J., Kim, S.H., Kim, S.D., 2010. Oxidative stress

373

responses of Daphnia magna exposed to TiO2 nanoparticles according to size

374

fraction. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 2268–2272.

375

Kim, T.H., Kim, M., Park, H.S., Shin, U.S., Gong, M.S., Kim, H.W., 2012.

376

Size-dependent cellular toxicity of silver nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,

377

Part A. 100A(4), 1033–1043.

378

Kiser, M.A., Ryu, H., Jang, H.Y., Hristovski, K., Westerhoff, P., 2010. Biosorption of 19

379

nanoparticles to heterotrophic wastewater biomass. Water Res. 44, 4105–4114.

380

Kyung, O.Y., Grabinski, C.M., Schrand, A.M., Murdock, R.C., Wang, W., Gu, B.H.,

381

Schlager, J.J., Hussain, S.M., 2009. Toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in

382

mouse keratinocytes. J. Nanopart. Res. 11(1), 15–24.

383

Lallo da Silva, B., Caetano, B.L., Chiari-Andréo, B. G., Pietro, R.C.L.R., Chiavacci,

384

L.A., 2019. Increased antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles: Influence of size

385

and surface modification. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 177, 440–447.

386

Lee, S.J., Lee, Y.S., Lee, Y.C., Choi, Y.L., 2006. Molecular characterization of

387

polyphosphate (PolyP) operon from Serratia marcescens. J. Basic. Microb. 46,

388

108‒115.

389

Li, X.M., Hu, Z.P., Ma, J.L., Wang, X.Y., Zhang, Y.P., Wang, W., Yuan, Z., 2018. The

390

systematic evaluation of size-dependent toxicity and multi-time biodistribution of

391

gold nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B. 167, 260–266.

392 393 394 395

Liu, G., Wang, D., Wang, J., Cesar, M., 2011. Effect of ZnO particles on activated sludge: role of particle dissolution. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 2852–2857. Ma, H.B., Williams, P.L., Diamond, S.A., 2013a. Ecotoxicity of manufactured ZnO nanoparticles—A review. Environ. Pollut. 172c, 76–85.

396

Ma, J.Y., Quan, X.C., Si, X.R., Wu, Y.C., 2013b. Responses of anaerobic granule and

397

flocculent sludge to ceria nanoparticles and toxic mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol.

398

149, 346‒352.

399

Napierska, D., Thomassen, L.C., Rabolli, V., Lison, D., Gonzalez, L., Kirsch-Volders,

400

M., Martens, J.A., Hoet, P.H., 2009. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of monodisperse 20

401 402

silica nanoparticles in human endothelial cells. Small 5(7), 846–853. Padmavathy, N., Vijayaraghavan, R., 2008. Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO

403

nanoparticles-an

404

035004–035010.

405 406

antimicrobial

study.

Sci.

Technol.

Adv.

Mater.

9(3),

Padmavathy, N., Vijayaraghavan, R., 2008. Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles—an antimicrobial study. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 9, 43–48.

407

Pasquet, J., Chevalier, Y., Couval, E., Bouvier, D., Bolzinger, M.A., 2015. Zinc oxide

408

as a new antimicrobial preservative of topical products: Interactions with common

409

formulation ingredients. Int. J. Pharm. 479(1), 88–95.

410

Pasquet, J., Chevalier, Y., Couval, E., Bouvier, D., Noizet, G., Morlière, C., Bolzinger,

411

M.A., 2014a. Antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide particles on five

412

micro-organisms of the Challenge Tests related to their physicochemical

413

properties. Int. J. Pharm. 460(1-2), 92–100.

414

Pasquet, J., Chevalier, Y., Pelletier, J., Couval, E., Bouvier, D., Bolzinger, M.A.,

415

2014b. The contribution of zinc ions to the antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide.

416

Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 457, 263–274.

417

Pletikapić, G., Žutić, V., Vinković Vrček, I., Svetličić, V., 2012. Atomic force

418

microscopy characterization of silver nanoparticles interactions with marine

419

diatom cells and extracellular polymeric substance. J. Mol. Recognit. 25,

420

309‒317.

421

Puay, N.Q., Qiu, G.L., Ting, Y.P., 2015. Effect of Zinc oxide nanoparticles on

422

biological wastewater treatment in a sequencing batch reactor. J. Clean. Prod. 88, 21

423

139‒145.

424

Qiu, G., Ting, Y.P., 2014. Direct phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater via

425

osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for wastewater treatment. Bioresour.

426

Technol. 170, 221–229.

427

Raghupathi, K.R., Koodali, R.T., Manna, A.C., 2011. Size-dependent bacterial growth

428

inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles.

429

Langmuir 27(7), 4020–4028.

430

Santo, N., Fascio, U., Torres, F., Guazzoni, N., Tremolada, P., Bettinetti, R., Mantecca,

431

P., Bacchetta, R., 2014. Toxic effects and ultrastructural damages to Daphnia

432

magna of two differently sized ZnO nanoparticles: Does size matter? Water Res.

433

53, 339–350.

434

Scown, T.M., van Aerle, R., Tyler, C.R., 2010. Review do engineered nanoparticles

435

pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 40(7),

436

653–670.

437 438

Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Forrest, M.L., Stroeve, P., Mahmoudi, M., 2012. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2323‒2343.

439

Sheng, G.P., Yu, H.Q., Li, X.Y., 2010. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of

440

microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review.

441

Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 882–894.

442 443 444

Sheng, Z.Y., Liu, Y., 2011. Effects of silver nanoparticles on wastewater biofilms. Water Res. 45, 6039‒6050. Sibag, M., Choi, B.G., Suh, C., Lee, K.H., Lee, J.W., Maeng, S.K., Cho, J., 2015. 22

445

Inhibition of total oxygen uptake by silica nanoparticles in activated sludge. J.

446

Hazard. Mater. 283, 841‒846.

447

Sirelkhatim, A., Mahmud, S., Seeni, A., Kaus, N.H.M., Ann, L.C., Bakhori, S.K.M.,

448

Hasan, H., Mohamad, D., 2015. Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial

449

activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 7(3), 219–242.

450

Tan, M., Qiu, G., Ting, Y.P., 2015. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on wastewater

451

treatment and their removal behavior in a membrane bioreactor. Bioresour.

452

Technol. 185, 125‒133.

453

Wang, S., Gao, M.C., She, Z.L., Zheng, D., Jin, C.J., Guo, L., Zhao, Y.G., Li, Z.W.,

454

Wang, X.J., 2016. Long-term effects of ZnO nanoparticles on nitrogen and

455

phosphorus removal, microbial activity and microbial community of a sequencing

456

batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 428–436.

457

Wang, S.T., Li, S.P., Wang, W.Q., You, H., 2015. The impact of zinc oxide

458

nanoparticles on nitrification and the bacterial community in activated sludge in

459

an SBR. RSC. Adv. 5, 67335‒67342.

460

Wang, Z.C., Gao, M.C., Wang, Z., She, Z.L., Chang, Q.B., Sun, C.Q., Zhang, J., Ren,

461

Y., Yang, N., 2013. Effect of salinity on extracellular polymeric substances of

462

activated sludge from an anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor. Chemosphere

463

93, 2789–2795.

464

Wei, L.L., Ding, J., Xue, M., Qin, K., Wang, S., Xin, M., Jiang, J.Q., Zhao, Q.L., 2019.

465

Adsorption mechanism of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles on two typical sludge EPS:

466

Effect of nanoparticle diameter and fractional EPS polarity on binding. 23

467

Chemosphere 214, 210–219.

468

Yang, H.W., Jiang, Z.P., Shi, S.Q., Tang, W.Z., 2002. INT-dehydrogenase activity test

469

for assessing anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds. Ecotox. Environ.

470

Safe. 53, 416‒421.

471

Zhang X.J., Zhang, N., Fu, H.Q., Chen, T., Liu, S., Zheng, S.H., Zhang, J., 2017.

472

Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on nitrogen removal, microbial activity and

473

microbial community of CANON process in a membrane bioreactor. Bioresour.

474

Technol. 243, 93–99.

475

Zheng, X., Wu, R., Chen, Y.G., 2011. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on wastewater

476

biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45,

477

2826‒2832.

24

60

a

50

a1

Frequency (%)

40

30

20

10

0 5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Diameter (nm)

20

b

b1

Frequency (%)

15

10

5

0 15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

Diameter (nm)

15

c

c1

Frequency (%)

10

5

0 60

80

100

120

140

160

Diameter (nm)

Fig. 1.

60

SOUR (mg O2 g-1 MLSS h-1)

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

50

* ** 40

* **

* **

30 20 10 0 0

2

5

10

30

ZnO NPs addition (mg L-1)

Fig. 2.

60

7 15 nm

50 nm

b

90 nm

15 nm

6

4

* 3

**

* * *

***

2

SNOR (mg N g-1 MLSS h-1)

SAOR (mg N g-1 MLSS h-1)

a

50 nm

*

5

**

* **

* **

4

90 nm

* *

** **

3 2

1 1 0

0

14

c

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

15

*

10

**

*

**

*

8

**

*

**

**

*

6 4

SNRR (mg N g-1 MLSS h-1)

SNIRR (mg N g-1 MLSS h-1)

12

d

15 nm

50 nm

**

**

90 nm

* * **

10

* *

*

5

2 0

0 20 15 nm

50 nm

f

90 nm

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

15

*

15

*

*

*

*

* *

10

*

* *

*

* *

*

5

SPRR (mg P g-1 MLSS h-1)

SPUR (mg P g-1 MLSS h-1)

e

*

**

*

*

10

** *

** *

5

0

0

0

2 5 10 30 ZnO NPs addition (mg L-1)

0

60

2

5

10

30

ZnO NPs addition (mg

Fig. 3.

L-1)

60

15 DHA ((mg TF mg-1 MLSS h-1)

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

* *

10

*

* **

* **

5

0 0

2

5

10

30

ZnO NPs addition (mg L-1 )

Fig. 4.

60

0.0003 AMO (mg NO2--N mg-1 protein min-1)

15 nm

50 nm

***

0.0002

90 nm

NOR (mg NO2--N mg-1 protein min-1)

0.0016

a

b

15 nm

*

0.0012

***

***

50 nm

*

90 nm

* *

** *

*

*

0.0008

0.0001

0.0004

0.0000

0.0000

c

15 nm

50 nm

90 nm

0.0060

*

***

*

**

**

* *

0.0040

**

0.0020

NR (mg NO2--N mg-1 protein min-1)

NIR (mg NO2--N mg-1 protein min-1)

0.0005 15 nm

0.0004

*

*

50 nm

90 nm

**

*

**

*

0.0003

*

0.0002

0.0001

0.0000 0.2000

·

0.1000

PPK(µmol NADPH mg-1 protein min-1 )

0.0000 PPX (µmol pnitrophenol mg-1 protein min-1)

d

e

15 nm

*

0.0800

*

50 nm

* * *

0.0600

90 nm

** *

*

**

0.0400

0.0200

f

15 nm

0.1500

50 nm

*

*

90 nm

* *

* *

*

0.1000

0.0500

0.0000

0.0000

0

2 5 10 30 ZnO NPs addition (mg L-1 )

0

60

2

5

10

30

ZnO NPs addition (mg L-1)

Fig. 5.

60

210

a

15 nm

300

50 nm

90 nm

*

EPS 250

* 200

*

150

*

* **

**

**

*

*

**

100 50

PS and PN contents ( mg g-1 VSS)

EPS contents ( mg g-1 VSS)

350

0

PN

*

15 nm 150

*

120

* 90 60

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

30

150

c

PS

PN

*

50 nm *

90

* * *

60

*

*

*

30

PS and PN contents ( mg g-1 VSS)

PS and PN contents ( mg g-1 VSS)

PS

0

150

120

b 180

d 120

PS

PN

90 nm

* *

90

* *

*

60

*

*

*

*

30

0

0

0

2 5 10 30 ZnO concentration (mg L-1 )

0

60

2

5

10

30

ZnO concentration (mg L-1 )

Fig. 6.

60

1

Highlights

2

• Size-dependent effects of ZnO NPs on the performance of SBR were studied.

3

• ZnO NPs had size- and concentration-dependent effects on COD and N removal.

4

• The ZnO NPs of 50 nm showed maximum inhibition effect on P removal.

5

• EPS contents increased in size- and concentration-dependent manner.

Figure captions Fig. 1. Characterization of ZnO NPs with different sizes. Size frequency of ZnO NPs of 15 nm (a), 50 nm (b) and 90 nm (c) as observed from TEM images. Typical TEM image of ZnO NPs of 15 nm (a1), 50 nm (b1) and 90 nm (c1). Fig. 2. Effects of ZnO NPs with different sizes on SOUR. Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05) from the microbial activities of 0 mg L-1 ZnO NPs. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. Fig. 3. Effects of ZnO NPs with different sizes on microbial activity of activated sludge in SBR. (a) SAOR, (b) SNOR, (c) SNIRR, (d) SNRR, (e) SPRR and (f) SPUR. Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05) from the microbial activities of 0 mg L-1 ZnO NPs. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. Fig. 4. Effects of ZnO NPs with different sizes on DHA. Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05) from the microbial activities of 0 mg L-1 ZnO NPs. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. Fig. 5. Effects of ZnO NPs with different sizes on microbial enzymatic activities of activated sludge in SBR. (a) AMO, (b) NOR, (c) NIR, (d) NR, (e) PPX and (f) PPK. Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05) from the microbial activities of 0 mg L-1 ZnO NPs. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. Fig. 6. Effects of ZnO NPs with different sizes on EPS contents and PN and PS contents from activated sludge. (a) EPS contents; (b) 15 nm ZnO NPs; (c) 50 nm ZnO NPs; (d) 90 nm ZnO NPs. Asterisks indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05) from the microbial activities of 0 mg L-1 ZnO NPs. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements.

Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: