Surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs using far-infrared radiation

Surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs using far-infrared radiation

Accepted Manuscript Title: Surface Decontamination of Whole-Shell Eggs Using Far-Infrared Radiation Author: Gunseli ¨ Bobus¸ Alkaya Ferruh Erdogdu A. ...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 48 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Surface Decontamination of Whole-Shell Eggs Using Far-Infrared Radiation Author: Gunseli ¨ Bobus¸ Alkaya Ferruh Erdogdu A. Kadir Halkman H. Ibrahim Ekiz PII: DOI: Reference:

S0960-3085(16)00032-8 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2016.02.006 FBP 689

To appear in:

Food and Bioproducts Processing

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

23-10-2015 15-2-2016 23-2-2016

Please cite this article as: Alkaya, G.B., Erdogdu, F., Halkman, A.K., Ekiz, H.I.,Surface Decontamination of Whole-Shell Eggs Using Far-Infrared Radiation, Food and Bioproducts Processing (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2016.02.006 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Highlights: -

Infrared processing for surface pasteurization of whole shell eggs were investigated.

-

Surface temperature changes were related with the microbial reduction

Changes in the physical properties of the eggs after infrared processing

cr

-

ip t

data.

-

us

were investigated.

Applicability of infrared processing for surface pasteurization was

Ac ce

pt

ed

M

an

demonstrated.

1 Page 1 of 36

ip t

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

cr

Surface Decontamination of Whole-Shell Eggs Using Far-Infrared Radiation Günseli Bobuş Alkaya1, Ferruh Erdogdu2*,

1

M

an

us

A. Kadir Halkman2 and H. Ibrahim Ekiz1

Department of Food Engineering

University of Mersin

Department of Food Engineering

pt

2

ed

33343 Ciftlikkoy-Mersin, Turkey

Ankara University

Ac ce

06110 Diskapi-Ankara, Turkey * Corresponding Author e-mail:

[email protected] [email protected]

Tel:

+90-533-812-0686

Fax:

+90-312-317-8711

2 Page 2 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Abstract Shell eggs from healthy chickens are assumed sterile inside, but numerous microorganisms might be present on the shell. While warm water and controlled

ip t

microwave applications are some common whole egg pasteurization processes, surface decontamination might be a feasible process since majority of

cr

microorganisms are located over the shell. With infrared application`s direct

us

influence on the surface, similar to the case of pulsed light and ultra-violet applications, the objective of this study was to determine its potential for surface

an

decontamination of whole-shell eggs. For this purpose, shell eggs were inoculated with E. coli ATCC 25922 strain, considering its similar resistance

M

compared to Salmonella Enteritidis to heat, and processed under infrared conditions from 180 to 350 °C. Processing at 250 °C for 110 s resulted in 3.37 log

ed

cycle reduction without causing any denaturation in albumen and adverse effects

pt

in yolk index, Haugh unit, albumen pH and foaming capacity. These results demonstrated the potential of infrared heating for surface decontamination of

Ac ce

whole shell eggs as a possible industrial application. Key words: whole shell eggs; surface decontamination; infrared processing

3 Page 3 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Introduction Eggs are one of the most important economic and balanced protein source available in daily diet, and 540 billion eggs are consumed in the world annually.

ip t

USDA risk assessment studies indicated the possibility of 1 in 20,000 fresh eggs might contain Salmonella Enteritidis (Mermelstein, 2001), and eggs are reported

cr

to be most frequently involved with Salmonella outbreaks (Hiero et al., 2009;

us

EFSA, 2009; Martelli and Davies, 2012). Salmonella is at the top of the CDC list for foodborne illness estimates resulting deaths in the USA (CDC, 2014). It might be

an

inside the eggs (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005) due to vertical (trans-ovarian transmission in utero to developing pre-ovulatory

M

follicles or trans-shell transmission through shell pores; Hou et al., 1996) or horizontal transmission (contamination of shell after it has formed either during

ed

ovipostion or from environment following the oviposition; Jones et al., 1995;

pt

Chousalkar et al., 2013). While the latter has higher possibility assuming eggs are obtained from healthier chickens, contamination of eggs and eggshells have been

Ac ce

identified as one of the major causes of foodborne Salmonella problems (Howard et al., 2012; Whiley and Ross, 2015). Besides the presence of Salmonella over the

shell, possible shell contamination with other aerobic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae (Jones et al., 2004; Musgrove et al., 2005) is also a possible risk factor. Storage temperature has a certain effect on penetration (Al-Nataour et al., 2012) of the microorganisms to the interior of the eggs, and possible contamination of egg contents might also occur via breaking shell for process purposes through the production line.

4 Page 4 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Various methods have been proposed for egg surface decontamination (FDA, 2009) such as dry cleaning or washing (Hierro et al., 2009; Chousalkar et al., 2013) with alternative approaches for surface pasteurization: ultra-violet irradiation (Scott, 1993; Kuo et al., 1997; De Reu et al., 2006), pulsed light

ip t

treatment (Hierro et al., 2009; Lasagabaster et al., 2011), hot-air application (Manfreda et al., 2010; Pasquali et al., 2010), pulsed ultra-violet light (Keklik et

cr

al., 2010) and non-thermal atmospheric gas plasma (Ragni et al., 2010). For

us

surface decontamination purposes, James et al. (2002) determined the applicability of hot-air, hot-water, infra-red radiation and atmospheric steam

an

reporting the requirement of further studies on this subject. Besides surface decontamination approaches, there are also studies in the literature for

M

decontamination of the whole shell eggs. Hot-water based heat treatment (Davidson, 2003), irradiation and ultrasonic treatment (Hou et al., 1996) and

ed

controlled microwave (Erasmus and Rossouw, 2012) are possible methods for

pt

this purpose. In decontamination of shell eggs, loss of functional properties (foaming, coagulation, emulsification) due to protein denaturation even at low

Ac ce

temperatures (e.g., below 60 C) might be observed (Perry et al., 2011).

Therefore, considering the higher possibility of horizontal transmission, surface decontamination without any further damages to the egg constituents would be a preferred way.

Infrared (IR) radiation is one of the oldest ways for processing agricultural products. It is classified into near- (NIR; 0.78 to 1.4 μm), mid- (MIR; 1.4 to 3 μm) and far-infrared (FIR; 3 to 1000 μm) regions. Rastogi (2012) emphasized the efficient heat transfer by IR heating with less process time and energy cost while Sawai et al. (2000) demonstrated that the FIR heating was 5 Page 5 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... more effective in eliminating vegetative cells compared to thermal conductive heating. Besides, lower temperature of the emitters in this region, compared to the case of NIR and MIR regions, enables an effective process control. IR processing was applied for surface decontamination of various food products

ip t

including strawberries (Scheerlinck et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2007); turkey frankfurtes (Huang, 2004), hotdogs (Huang and Sites, 2007), fig fruit (Hamanaka

cr

et al., 2011), cumin (Erdogdu and Ekiz, 2011), black pepper (Erdogdu and Ekiz,

us

2011), oregano (Eliasson et al., 2014) and Gorgonzola cheese rinds (Bernini et al., 2015).

an

Exposing eggs to IR heating results in an increase in shell temperature (due to the shorter wavelength, IR does not have the ability to penetrate deeply),

M

and heat is conducted to interior by conduction. With low thermal conductivity (0.55-0.61 W/m-K; Almonacid et al., 2007; Erdogdu et al., 2007; Fabbri et al.,

ed

2012) and high viscosity of albumen (0.0304 Pa-s; Kemps et al., 2010, e.g, ≈30

pt

times higher than water), heat transfer rate (mainly dominated by conduction) inside tends to be rather slow compared to the case of a natural convection

Ac ce

heating in a low viscosity liquid product. If the exposure time is then properly controlled, shell temperature can be preferentially raised to a degree that a target microorganism can be inactivated without substantially increasing the interior temperature.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential of IR application for surface decontamination of whole shell eggs and compare the possible changes in the quality attributes of the IR processed eggs with the fresh ones. Materials and Methods 6 Page 6 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Through the course of this study, commercial grade ‘A’ fresh unfertilized table chicken eggs (medium size, 53-63 g) were purchased from a local market and used through inoculation and IR processing experiments. The eggs were stored in refrigerated conditions through the study and kept at room temperature for

ip t

one night before their use for inoculation and IR processing studies. Based on the given objectives, this study was carried out in 3-stages. In

cr

the first stage, culture preparation and surface inoculation over the egg shells

us

were completed, and this was followed by infrared treatment at various time temperature combinations. In the last stage, certain physical properties (changes

an

in yolk index, Haugh unit, albumen pH and foaming capacity) of the IR processed eggs were determined to compare the results with the fresh ones.

M

Culture preparation and surface inoculation:

E. coli ATCC 25922 strain, a useful surrogate for E. coli O157:H7, was used to

ed

determine the IR effect on the surface decontamination of whole shell eggs for

pt

surface penetration studies. Various studies in the literature also demonstrated that the E. coli ATCC 25922 strain might be used as a surrogate for E. coli

Ac ce

O157:H7 (Elben et al., 2005; Kim and Harrison, 2009). Hence, E. coli ATCC 25922

strain was used through the culture preparation and shell inoculation stages. To prepare the culture preparation for egg shell inoculation, activated E. coli ATCC 25922 pure culture strain was grown in a 250 ml TSB (Triptic Soy Broth, Merck) at 37 °C for 18 h to have 109 CFU/mL of strain in the culture. This culture was then used in the shell inoculation. For the inoculation, the eggs were weighed and brushed with soap first. After rinsing out with warm water, they were dipped into 70% ethanol for one minute and washed again with sterile and warm water. These eggs were then 7 Page 7 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... located in a sterile laminar air flow cabinet and allowed to dry for 30 min. The shell-dried eggs were then placed in the TSB culture for 10 min under orbital shaking at 200 rpm. Following the inoculation step, the eggs were left to dry for 40 min again in the laminar air flow cabinet prior to the IR processing at various

Far infrared processing for surface decontamination:

ip t

times and temperatures.

cr

Far infrared processing for surface decontamination was carried out after half an

us

hour following the IR heating unit temperature reached to the process

temperature. The infrared heating unit (Fig. 1 demonstrates the schematic

an

representation) was designed with flat electrically operated ceramic emitters, of 650 W with maximum surface temperature of 553 °C (Ceramicx, Cork, Ireland)

M

working under far-infrared conditions. Under the given temperature range, minimum wavelength obtained from the ceramic emitters was 3.507 µm based

ed

on the Wien`s displacement law (Eq. 1):

pt



2897.6  3.507  m  553  273.15 

(1)

Ac ce

Where λ is the wavelength. Considering that the surface temperatures of the heating elements would be lower than the given maximum value, the resulting wavelenghts are expected to be higher falling into the far infrared region. The emitters were installed within aluminum reflectors. Since the

infrared heaters radiated in all directions, they were specifically placed within aluminum reflectors to focus as much of the radiation as possible uniformly onto the processed eggs. This unit consisted of 48 ceramic infrared heaters located on side walls enabling the product inside the tunnel to be heated from all surfaces. To control the process temperature, the infrared unit was assembled with four 8 Page 8 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... thermocouples located between the infrared emitters (2 at the top and 2 at the bottom left and right part of the system – Fig. 1). After setting the process temperature of the system, temperature equilibration was monitored before conducting the experiments.

ip t

During the IR processing experiments, the eggs were placed at the center line of the conveyor belt of the system – right at the centerline of the infrared

cr

system - for a given time for infrared processing at a given process temperature.

us

Far-infrared treatment time and process temperatures were determined in preexperiments based on the initialization of denaturation in egg albumen and

an

reported in Table 1. In the pre-experiments, the eggs, processed for various times under the given IR heating conditions, were broken into a Petri dish to

M

observe the changes in the albumen and determine the denaturation initialization point. The required maximum process time at a given IR processing

ed

temperature was then determined based on the visual observation of the initial

pt

denaturation point in the albumen (Fig. 2). While three inoculated and unprocessed eggs were used as control, three

Ac ce

eggs were processed for each given time - temperature combination (Table 1). Following the IR process, the eggs were transferred into a beaker, containing 70 mL dilution liquid (0.85 % NaCl + 0.1 % Tween 80) for 10 min. The spread method was used to evaluate the number of surviving E. coli ATCC 25922 cells

where the inoculums were spread by a sterile Drigalski-spatula and inoculated (Hierro et al., 2009; Pasquali et al., 2010; Herigstad et al., 2011; Bote-Salo et al., 2012 and Gole et al., 2014). The colonies were counted following the incubation period.

9 Page 9 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... For the IR processed eggs, surface temperature measurement was carried out during processing using an IR camera (FLIR Systems AB, FLIR-I50, Sweden). The temperature measurement was carried out through an observation hole located on top of the unit. The field of view on the shell from the viewing distance

ip t

of 50 cm (from the observation point to the egg surface) was scanned with the IR camera. The IR images provided a partial temperature map of the shell from the

cr

view angle, and these surface images were processed to determine and report

us

the average surface temperature changes of the field of view by using the Flir Quickreport software (V1.2 SP1). In the image analysis, thermal emissivity of the

Changes in the physical properties:

an

shells was set to be 0.9 as also applied by Van Brecht et al. (2002).

M

Changes in some physical properties (yolk index, Haugh unit, albumen pH and foaming capacity) of the IR processed eggs were determined for the effect of

ed

temperature on the egg quality as reported by Manfreda et al. (2010). At each

pt

time-temperature combination, 3 eggs processed, and the results were compared with the case of non-processed eggs. Yolk index (YI), Haugh unit (HU), albumen

Ac ce

pH and foaming capacity were determined after the IR process. The yolk index was calculated as the height of the yolk divided by the width (Stadelman, 1990), measured with a digital micrometer (Mitutoyo Corp., Absolute digimatic CD15CPX). Albumen pH was measured with a pH meter (Hanna, HI 98103), and Haugh unit was calculated using the empirical equation given by Perry et al. (2011). This equation was based on the height of egg albumen to the mass of the unbroken egg: HU  100  log  h  0.01  5.6745   30  m 0..37  100   1.9 

(2)

10 Page 10 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Where h is the height of egg albumen and m is mass of unbroken egg. Besides these three quality attributes, change in the foaming capacity of the processed eggs were also demonstrated to indicate the possible effect in the functional properties of the egg proteins. The foaming capacity was determined applying

ip t

the methodology applied by Monfort et al. (2013) where the volume of the egg albumens were measured and 15% solutions were prepared with distilled water.

cr

These solutions were then whipped with a mixer (Arzum Soprano Max Model

us

AR161, max 700W, Turkey) at the max speed in a 1 L beaker for 2 min, and the foam volume was measured with a digital micrometer. The foaming capacity,

an

percentage of the increase in the foam volume, was then calculated using the following equation:

V2  V1  100 V1

(3)

M

% FC 

respectively.

ed

Where the V1 and V2 were the foam volumes of the initial the whipped solutions,

pt

While Haugh unit and yolk index were indicators of the egg quality,

Ac ce

foaming capacity showed its functional property. Any decrease in these values were assumed to be deteriorate to the quality. Perry et al. (2011) also used Haugh unit and yolk index to test quality changes of pasteurized shell eggs with heat and heat-ozone combination during extended storage, and the foaming capacity was recently used by Monfort et al. (2013) to demonstrate the effect of liquid whole egg ultra-pasteurization on the functional properties. The albumen pH was also checked for any significant increase in the pH. Possible pH increase of the egg albumen is temperature dependent and related with CO2, which is linked to the decrease in the in the shelf life.

11 Page 11 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... The results for these properties were reported to be the average ± standard deviation. The effect of IR processing on the changes of yolk index, Haugh unit and albumen pH was then analyzed using a single factor ANOVA at 95% confidence interval to compare the control group and processed eggs`

Results and Discussion

cr

Surface decontamination:

ip t

physical properties at each process temperature.

us

E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was used to determine the IR treatment effect on the surface decontamination of the whole shell eggs. Eblen et al. (2005) studied the

an

growth and survival characteristics of 15 nonpathogenic generic E. coli strains and one nonpathogenic E. coli O157:H43 strain in five different growth media.

M

These strains’ growth and survival characteristics (at 60°C) were reported to be similar to the pathogenic Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 strains. Among these

ed

strains, E. coli ATCC 25922 had the most similar thermal - kinetic properties to

pt

Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 (Eblen et al., 2005). Kim and Harrison (2009) used non-pathogenic E. coli and pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 strains based on their

Ac ce

similarities in cryotolerance, cell surface characteristics (hydrophobicity, zeta potential, and morphology) and connection to the lettuce. The results of this study indicated that E. coli ATCC 25922 was a useful surrogate for E. coli O157:H7 for surface penetration studies. Jin et al. (2008) also demonstrated that non-pathogenic E. coli K12 might serve as a surrogate for pathogenic Salmonella Enteritidis in liquid egg for validation of a pasteurization process. Hence, E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was chosen in the current study through the culture preparation and shell inoculation stages. The activated E. coli ATCC 25922 culture density was prepared to have 109 CFU/mL while maximum 12 Page 12 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... loading on the egg shell was 105 CFU/cm2. Pasquali et al. (2010) achieved a similar bacterial load on the shell eggs ranging between 104 and 105 CFU/eggshell. Fig. 3 shows the change in E. coli ATCC 25922 cells by infrared treatment

ip t

from 180 to 350 °C. The infrared treatment at 250 °C for 110 s resulted in the maximum reduction (3.37 log cycle) over the shell while there was no

cr

denaturation observed in the albumen at the given process times at each IR

us

processing temperature. The denaturation start was assumed to be a significant index to conclude the pasteurization process since a partial albumen coagulation

an

would be indication of a decay in the egg quality (Fabbri et al., 2012). Start of denaturation in the albumen indicates the conformational changes in the protein

M

structure, and the denaturation point for albumen is given by Donovan et al. (1975) in the range of 60 – 65 °C. Other infrared processing conditions at 180°C

ed

– 200 s; 300 °C – 60 s and 350 °C – 20 s led to log-reductions of 1.63; 2.66 and

pt

1.7, respectively. Fabrri et al. (2012) also obtained a 1.9 log reduction in the number of S. Enteritidis cells using a hot-air treatment of egg shell surface and

Ac ce

emphasized that the significance of even this level of reduction without causing any significant changes in the eggs` quality attributes leads to ≈99% decrease in the number of the cells of S. Enteritidis. Fig. 4 shows the average surface average temperature change of the

eggshell during far-infrared processing at 250 and 300 °C (the results were the average of the 3-replicates) while Fig. 5 shows the surface temperature distribution over the egg surface during infrared processing at 250 oC at 110 s and 300 oC at 60 s. Since the highest number of microbial reductions was obtained at these time-temperature combinations, the resulting surface average 13 Page 13 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... temperature change (calculated based on the view angle of the IR camera) was reported. After the infrared processing at 250 °C for 110 s processing, surface average temperature reached just below 60 °C (58.7 °C) while it was just above 60 °C (62.7 °C) at 300 °C – 60 s processing (Fig. 4). The reason that the lower

ip t

reduction was obtained at higher temperature processing was due to the longer processing time at the lower temperature of 250 °C leading to a possible

cr

temperature uniformity throughout the whole shell surface (Fig. 5).

us

As indicated, there was a significant non-homogenous temperature distribution over the shell (Fig. 5). Besides, the overall microbial change

an

throughout the shell was reported rather than a certain portion where the infrared temperature image was obtained since the experimental set-up choice

M

was preferred to resemble the actual technological process. Scattered results, as also demonstrated in Fig. 3, was the result of the non-homogeneous temperature

ed

and resulting non-homogeneous microbial reduction distribution.

pt

If the accumulative effect of temperature to reduce the number of a given microorganism (z- -values for Salmonella Enteritidis strain 13076 and E. coli K12

Ac ce

in liquid whole egg, reported by Jin et al., 2008, were 4.07 min and 0.17 min, respectively) were calculated based on the temperature increase obtained over the shell (Eq. 3), that would result in 1.32 and 0.39 min of decontamination values for Salmonella Enteritidis and 1.38 and 0.51 min E. coli K12 at the process temperatures of 250 and 300 °C (the reference temperature for these calculations were 60 °C). This would also explain the reason why higher reductions are obtained at a lower process temperature. As indicated above, that is due to the effect of process time – temperature combination, and the higher process time (due to the 14 Page 14 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... earlier start of local denaturation at higher temperatures) at a lower process temperature of 250 °C. This was not the case for the process temperature of 180 °C due to the shorter time and resulting limited increase of the surface temperature. T  t   Tref z

dt

0

(4)

ip t

t

F   10

cr

Where Tref (°C)is the reference temperature, T is the average surface

temperature (°C), and z is the z-value (°C), and F might be defined to be the

us

decontamination value for this study.

an

The applied process time – temperature combination and the evolved temperature over the shell (with increase in the albumen temperature), infrared

M

process at 250 °C for 110 s (where the average shell surface temperature was 58.7 °C) did not result in any significant changes in the albumen. As indicated by

ed

Ramachandran et al. (2011), USDA reported that the minimum temperature without affecting the physical properties of albumen is 55.6 °C with a minimum

pt

holding time of 6.2 min. This combination resulted in the highest number of

Ac ce

microbial reductions due to the well-balanced temperature distribution over the shell as explained above. For other IR processing conditions, temperature changes revealed that the

maximum egg surface temperature was almost 50 °C after processing for 200 s at 180 °C leading to 1.63 log cycle reduction. This level of reduction, almost 50% less compared to the case at 250 °C for 110 s, did not account for a proper decontamination condition. Besides, at this low level of reduction, significant albumen denaturation was observed at 200 s due to the local over-heating points through the shell as a result of the longer processing time. The IR surface images 15 Page 15 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... also revealed the non-uniformity in the surface temperature distribution of the eggs processed at higher temperatures. As explained, 3.37 log cycle reduction was obtained under far infrared processing at 250 °C for 110 s. However, as reported by Silva and Gibbs (2012),

ip t

for food products containing poultry, a minimum process resulting in 7 log cycle reduction is suggested for Salmonella by Canadian Food Inspection Agency

cr

(CFIA, 2005). Besides, USDA risk assessment studies report the possibility of 1 in

us

20000 fresh eggs might contain Salmonella Enteritidis (Mermelstein, 2001) leading to the requirement of 5 log cycle reduction. Based on these, IR surface

an

treatment might be suggested to be a possible pre-process for an additional pasteurization method to reach 5 to 7 log cycle reduction or a possible

M

decontamination technique rather than a proper pasteurization method. In the production of pasteurized liquid egg products, for example, IR decontamination

ed

methodology might also be a possible pre-process to reduce the risk of

pt

contamination during shell breaking process and to prevent the violations of the following pasteurization norms. Isolation of Salmonella from ready-to-eat

Ac ce

pasteurized liquid egg products as a pasteurization-resistant bacteria or due to contamination (Gurtler et al., 2015) also supports this suggestion. Howard et al. (2012) reported the significance of obtaining a possible 3-log

cycle reduction in the number of Salmonella Enteritidis in a decontamination

process. It was stated that this kind of reduction rate might result in 70% decrease in the eventual Salmonella related illnesses. James et al. (2002) also applied IR heating at 210 °C for 30 s on shell egg while the exterior temperature of the shell was reported to be 88 °C with internal surface temperature of 52 °C. There were no visible damage to the shell or no visible denaturation of albumen 16 Page 16 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... observed following this process. As a result, the infrared treatment was theoretically be justified to reduce a certain number of microorganisms on the shell eggs without causing changes on albumen and other quality factors. There have been various studies to reduce the Salmonella Enteritidis on shell eggs

ip t

(Stadelman et al. 1996; Hou et al. 1996; Pasquali et al. 2010; James et al. 2002), and heat treatments are reported to be the mostly used processes even though

cr

there might be possible quality losses in egg components especially due to egg

us

albumen denaturation observed at rather lower temperatures of less than 60 °C (Hou et al., 1996). Pasquali et al. (2010) also used a hot air apparatus to

an

pasteurize the shell eggs with the initial loads of 104 to 105 CFU/egg-shell. Two shots of hot air at 600 °C for 8 s with a 30 s cold air break were applied, and 1.9

M

log cycle reduction in the number of Salmonella Enteritidis was obtained with no significant quality changes. They have also indicated the significance of 1 log

ed

cycle reduction due to the corresponding foodborne risk reduction of Salmonella

pt

Enteritidis for human health. Stolz et al. (2015) also obtained 2.4 log cycle of reduction, conforming 99.6% of the initial Salmonella Enteritidis population

Ac ce

using non-thermal atmospheric plasma. The given conclusion with the maximum 3.37 log cycle reduction obtained

at 250 °C for 110 s was reported based on the results where the IR exposure time was determined not to affect the initial denaturation in the egg albumin. It is expected and the pre-experiments also demostrated that the further increase of the exposure at the given maximum process times (Table 1) would give a start in the albumin denaturation. However, it might be possible to apply a variable process temperatures to eliminate the initialization of the denaturation while increasing the effect of IR temperature to lead to at least 5-log cycle reductions 17 Page 17 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... for surface pasteurization purposes without affecting the physical properties of the egg constituents. Changes in the physical properties: Table 2 reports the changes in the physical properties of the infrared processed

ip t

and control group eggs. Regarding the comparison between control group and processed eggs` physical properties at each process temperature, a single factor

cr

ANOVA test was applied at 95% confidence intervals to determine any

us

significant effect of processing time. There were no significant differences determined (p>0.05) as a function of processing time at a given process

an

temperature even though standard deviation of the foaming capacity values with respect to the average changed in a significant matter. The differences among the

M

IR temperatures were not tested since the objective was just to determine whether the processed temperature had any significant on a quality parameter.

ed

Besides these physical properties, there were also no mass losses observed

pt

during the IR processing.

Conclusions

Ac ce

External contamination of egg shell by Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae is a major concern in industry as a health hazard. Besides the effects on health issues, [resence of these microorganisms might even violate the pasteurization norms in the production of, for example, pasteurized liqud egg. In this study, IR application was demonstrated to be a feasible process for surface decontamination of shell eggs with its major advantage of directly influencing the surface. Processing at 250 °C for 110 s resulted in 3.37 log cycle reduction of E. coli ATCC 25922 strain (used in the experimental methodology as a surrogate for Salmonella Enteritidis)

18 Page 18 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... without causing any denaturation in albumen and adverse effects in yolk index, Haugh unit, albumen pH and foaming capacity. Further optimization studies are suggested for proper design of an infrared processing system to obtain a uniform temperature and heat flux distribution through the surface of the eggs for an

Acknowledgement

ip t

effective heat transfer.

cr

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Scientific Research Foundation,

us

University of Mersin, Turkey for supporting this project (Project No: 2015-TP31164). Besides, upon the start of this study, Dr. Erdogdu was also affiliated with

Ac ce

pt

ed

M

an

the Department of Food Engineering at the University of Mersin.

19 Page 19 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

References Almonacid, S., Simpson, R. and Teixeira, A. 2007. Heat transfer models for predicting Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs through supply chain

ip t

distribution. Journal of Food Science. 72: E508-E517. Al-Natour, M.Q., Alaboudi, A.R., Al-Hatamelh, N.A. and Osaili, T.M. 2012.

cr

Escherichia coli O157:H7 facilitates the penetration of Staphylococcus

us

aureus into table eggs. Journal of Food Science. 71: M29-M34.

Bernini, V., Dalzini, E., Lazzi, C., Bottari, B., Bisotti, S., Fontana, M. and Neviani, E.

an

2015. A multi-sampling approach ro evaluate an infrared surface treatment for reducing Listeria monocytogenes contamination on whole Gorgonzola

M

cheese rinds. Food Control. 55: 75-81.

Botey-Salo, P., Anyogu, A., Varnam, A.H. and Sutherland, J. P. 2012. Survival of

ed

inoculated Salmonella on the shell of hens’ eggs and its potential

pt

significance. Food Control. 28: 463-469. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2014. CDC Estimates of

Ac ce

Foodborne Illness in the United States.

Choisalkar, S.K.K., Roberts, J.R., Sexton, M., May, D. and Kiermeier, A. 2013. Effect of egg shell quality and washing on Salminella Infantis penetration. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 165: 77-83.

Davidson, L.J. 2003. October 14. Method for production of pasteurized in-shell chicken eggs. U.S. patent 6632464. De Reu, K., Grijspeerdt, K., Herman, L., Hendrickx, M., Uyttendaele, M., Debevere, J., Putirulan, F.D. and Bolder, N.M. 2006. The effect of a commercial UV

20 Page 20 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... disinfection system on the bacterial load of shell eggs. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 42: 144-148. Donovan, J.W., Mapes, C.J., Davis, J.G.D. and Garibaldi, J.A. 1975. A differential scanning calorimetric study of the stability of egg white to heat

ip t

denaturation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 26: 73-83. Eblen, D.R., Annous, B.A. and Sapers, G.M. 2005. Studies to select appropriate

cr

nonpathogenic surrogate Escherichia coli strains for potential use in place

us

of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in pilot plant studies. Journal of Food Protection. 68: 282-291.

an

EFSA, 2009. The community summary report on food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2007. EFSA Journal. 271: 1-102.

M

Eliasson, L., Libander, P., Lovenklev, M., Isaksson, S. and Ahrne, L. 2014. Infrared decontamination of oregano: effects on Bacillus cereus Spores, water

pt

E2455.

ed

activity, color and volatile compounds. Journal of Food Science. 79: E2447-

Erasmus, C. and Rossouw, M.J. 2012. March 22.In-shell pasteurization of eggs.

Ac ce

U.S. patent 20120067874 A1.

Erdogdu, F., Ferrua, M., Singh, S.K. and Singh, R.P. 2007. Air-impingement cooling of boiled eggs: analysis of flow visualization and heat transfer. Journal of Food Engineering. 79: 920-928.

Erdogdu, S.B. and Ekiz, H.I. 2011. Effect of ultraviolet and far infrared radiation on microbial decontamination and quality of cumin. Journal of Food Science. 76: M284-M292.

21 Page 21 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Erdogdu, S.B. and Ekiz, H.I. 2013. Far infrared and ultraviolet radiation as a combined method for surface pasteurization of black pepper seeds. Journal of Food Engineering. 116: 310-314. Fabbri, A., Cevoli, C. and Giunchi, A. 2012. Validation of a simplified numerical

ip t

model for hot-air treatment of egg shell surface. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 35: 695-700.

cr

FDA, 2009. Prevention of Salmonella Enteritidis in shell eggs during production,

us

storage and transportation. Federal Regulations. 74: 33030-100.

Gole, V.C., Roberts, J. R., Sexton, M., May, D., Kiermeier, A. and Chousalkar, K.K.

an

2014. Effect of egg washing and correlation between cuticle and egg penetration by various Salmonella strains. International Journal of Food

M

Microbiology: 182–183. 18–25.

Gurtler, J.B., Hinton Jr. A., Bailey, R.B., Cray Jr. W.C., Meinersmann, R.J., Ball, T.A.

ed

and Jin, T.Z. 2015. Salmonella isolated from ready-to-eat pasteurized liquid

pt

egg products: thermal resistance, biochemical profile and fatty acid analysis. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 206: 109-117.

Ac ce

Herigstad, B., Hamilton, M. and Heersink, J, 2011. How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 44: 121–129.

Hierro, E., Manzano, S., Ordonez, J.A., de la Hoz, L. and Fernandez M. 2009. Inactivation of Salmonella enterica Enteritidis on shell eggs by pulsed light technology. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 135:125-130. Hamanaka, D., Norimura, N., Baba, N., Mano, K., Kakiuchi, M., Tanaka, F. and Uchni, T. 2011. Surface decontamination of fig fruit by combination of

22 Page 22 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... infrared radiation heating with ultraviolet irradiation. Food Control. 22: 375-380. Hou, H., Singh, R.K., Muriana, P.M. and Stadelman, W.J. 1996. Pasteurization of intact shell eggs. Food Microbiology. 13:93-101.

ip t

Howard, Z.R., O’Bryan, C.A., Crandall, P.G. and Ricke, S.C. 2012. Salmonella Enteritidis in shell eggs: current issues and prospects for control. Food

cr

Research International. 45:755-764.

us

Huang, L. 2004. Infrared surface pasteurization of turkey frankfurters. Innovative Food Science and Emerging technolgoies. 5: 345-351.

an

Huang, L. and Sites, J. 2007. Elimination of Listeria monosytogenes on hotdogs by infrared surface treatment. Journal of Food Science. 73: M27-M31.

M

James, C., Lechevalier, V. and Ketteringham, L. 2002. Surface pasteurization of shell eggs, Journal of Food engineering. 53:193-197.

ed

Jin, T., Zhang, H., Boyd, G. and Tang, J. 2008. Thermal resistance of Salmonella

pt

enteritidis and Escherichia coli K12 in liquid egg determined by thermaldeath time disks. Journal of Food Engineering. 84: 608-614.

Ac ce

Jones, F.T., Rives, D.V. and Carey, J.B. 1995. Salmonella contamination in commercial eggs and egg production facility. Poultry Science. 74: 753-757.

Jones, D.R., Musgrove, M.T. and Northcutt, J.K. 2004. Variations in external and internal microbial populations of shell eggs during extended storage. Journal of Food Protection. 67: 2657-2660. Keklik, N.M., Demirci, A., Patterson, P.H. and Puri, V.M. 2010. Pulsed UV light inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells and its effects on egg quality. Journal of Food Protection. 8: 1408-1590.

23 Page 23 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Kemps, B.J., Bamelis, F.R>, Mertens, K., Decuypere, E.M., De Baerdemaeker, J.G. and De Ketalaere, B. 2010. The assessment of viscosity measurements on the albumen of consumption eggs as an indicator for freshness. Poultry Science. 89: 2699-2703.

ip t

Kim, J.K. and Harrison, M.A. 2009. Surrogate selection for Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on cryotolerance and attachment to romaine lettuce.

cr

Journal of Food Protection. 7:1385-1391.

us

Kuo, F-L., Carey, J.B. and Ricke, S.C. 1997. UV irradiation of shell eggs: effect on populations of aerobes, molds and inoculated Salmonella typhimurium.

an

Journal of Food Protection. 60: 639-643.

Lasagabaster, A., Arboleya, J.C., de maranon, I.M. 2011. Pulsed light technology

M

for surface decontamination of eggs: impact on salmonella inactivation and

128.

ed

egg quality. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 12: 124-

pt

Manfreda, G., Cevoli, C., Lucchi, A., Pasquali, F., Fabbri, A. and Franchini, A. 2010. Hot air treatment for surface decontamination of table eggs incfected with

Ac ce

Salmonella, Literia and Escherichia coli. Veterinary Research Communications. 34 (Supplement 1): S179-S182.

Martelli, F. and Davies, R.H. 2012. Salmonella serovars isolated from table eggs: an overview. Food Research International. 45: 745-754.

Mermelstein, N.H. 2001. Pasteurization of shell eggs. Food Technology. 55(12): 72-73, 79. Monfort, S., Sagarzazu, N., Condon, S., Raso, J. and Alvarez, I. 2013. Liquid whole egg ultrapasteurization by combination of PEF, heat and additives. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 6: 2070-2080. 24 Page 24 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Musgrove, M.T., Jones, D.R., Northcutt, J.K., Cox, N.A. and Harrison, M.A. 2005. Shell rinse and shell crush methods for the recovery of aerobic microorganisms and Enterobacteriaceae from shell eggs. Journal of Food Protection. 68: 2144-2148.

ip t

Pasquali, F., Fabbri, A., Cevoli, C., Manfreda, G. and Franchini, A. 2010. Hot air treatment for surface decontamination of table eggs. Food Control. 21:431-

cr

435.

us

Perry, J.J., Rodriguez-Saona, L.E. and Yousef, A.E. 2011. Quality of shell eggs pasteurized with heat or heat-ozone combination during extended storage.

an

Journal of Food Science. 76: S437-S444.

Ragni, L., Berardinelli, A., Vannini, L., Montanari, C., Sirri, F., Guerzoni, M.E. and

M

Guarnieri, A. 2010. Non-thermal atmospheric gas plasma device for surface decontamination of shell eggs. Journal of Food Engineering. 100: 125-132.

ed

Ramachandran, R., Malhotra, D., Anishaparvin, A. and Anandharamakrishnan, C.

pt

2011. Computational fluid dynamic simulation studies on pasteurization of egg in stationary and rotation modes. Innovative Food Science and

Ac ce

Emerging Technologies. 12: 38-44.

Rastogi, N.K. 2012. Recent trends and developments in infrared heating in food processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 52: 737-760.

Sawai, J., Sagara, K., Kasai, S., Igarashi, H., Hashimoto, A., Kokugan, T., Shimizu, M. and Kojima, H. 2000. Far-infrared irradiation-induced injuries to Escherichia coli at below the lethal temperature. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 24: 19-24.

25 Page 25 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Scheerlinck, N., Marquenie, D., Jancsok, P.T., Verboven, P., Moles, C.G., Banga, J.R. and Nicolai, B.M. 2004. A model-based approach to develop periodic thermal treatments for surface decontamination of strawberries. 34: 39-52. Scott, T.A. 1993. The effect of UV-light and air filtering system on embryo

ip t

viability and microorganism load on the egg shell. Journal of Applied Poultry research. 2: 19-25.

cr

Stadelman, W.J. 1990. Quality identification of shell eggs. In Egg Science and

Haworth Publishing Co., Binghamton, N.Y.

us

Technolgy (Eds. Stadelman, W.J. and Cotterill, O.J.). 3rd ed. Pp. 37-61.

an

Stadelman, W.J., Singh, R.K., Muriana, P.M. ve Hou, H. 1996. Pasteurization of eggs in the shell. Poultry Science. 75: 1122-1125.

M

Stolz, N., Weihe, T., Stachowiak, J., Braun, P., Schluter, O. and Ehlbeck, J. 2015. Decontamination of shell eggs by using non-thermal atmospheric pressure

ed

plasma. 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and

pt

Technology (ICBET 2015). 81: 81-84. Tanaka, F., Verboven, P., Scheerlinck, N., Morita, K., Iwasaki, K. and Nicolai, B.

Ac ce

2007. Investigation of far infrared radiation heating as an alternative technique for surface decontamination of strawberry. 79” 445-452.

Van Brecht, A., Aerts, J.M. Degraeve, P. and Berckmans, D. 2002. Quantification of the spatio-temporal eggshell temperature and convection coefficient by infrared thermography. Transactions of the ASAE. 45: 1951-1957. Whiley, H. and Ross, K. 2015. Salmonella and eggs: from production to plate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 12: 2543-2556.

26 Page 26 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Zhang, W., Zheng, J-X. and Xu, G-Y. 2011. Toward better control of Salmonella contamination by taking advantage of the egg`s self-defense system: a

Ac ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

ip t

review. Journal of Food Science. 76: R76-R81.

27 Page 27 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Figure Captions: Figure 1. A schematic representation of the infrared processing unit (the lengths are reported in cm).

ip t

Figure 2. Demonstration of the denaturation initialization in the egg albumen. Figure 3. The decrease in the number of E.coli ATCC25922 cells by infrared

treatment (a) 180 ˚C – 200 s (b) 250 ˚C – 110 s (c) 300 ˚C – 60 s and

cr

(d) 350 ˚C – 20 s.

Figure 4. Surface average temperature change (calculated based on the view processing at 250 and 300 ˚C.

Surface temperature images of the shell eggs infrared processed at (a)

an

Figure 5.

us

angle of the IR camera) of the egg shells during far infrared

Ac ce

pt

ed

M

250 ˚C for 90 s (b) 300 ˚C for 60 s.

28 Page 28 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs... Table 1. Experimental conditions for far infrared treatment time and temperatures. Process time (s)

180

0 – 120 – 150 – 180 - 200

250

0 - 30 - 60 - 90 - 100 - 110

300

0 – 30 – 45 - 60

cr

ip t

Infrared process temperature (oC)

350

0 – 5* - 10 – 15* - 20

Ac ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

* This data were only used in the microbiological analysis results to observe the decreasing trend.

29 Page 29 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Table 2. Effect of infrared processing time – temperature on yolk index, haugh unit and albumen pH. Foaming Capacity (%)

Control

9.43 ± 0.05

0.27 ± 0.03

48.5 ± 7.7

111.5 ± 19.1

120

9.35 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.02

37.4 ± 17.9

126..6 ± 30.5

150

9.41 ± 0.13

0.26 ± 0.03

31.6 ± 1.4

123.0 ± 13.6

180

9.47 ± 0.06

0.24 ± 0.02

44.7 ± 12.0

99.1 ± 13.6

200

9.34 ± 0.08

0.28 ± 0.05

59.6 ± 17.4

91.7 ± 29.9

Control

9.16 ± 0.04

0.37 ± 0.03

72.5 ± 6.5

111.5 ± 19.1

30

9.29 ± 0.04

0.32 ± 0.04

61.3 ± 10.0

110.0 ± 31.4

60

9.32 ± 0.02

90

9.23 ± 0.17

100

9.12 ± 0.09

110

9.07 ± 0.16

350 °C

an

us

cr

ip t

Haugh Unit

0.33 ± 0.03

62.6 ± 2.4

93.8 ± 18.9

0.34 ± 0.01

59.1 ± 14.4

100.3 ± 7.8

0.34 ± 0.01

60.9 ± 8.1

131.0 ± 26.4

0.36 ± 0.03

71.7 ± 8.1

130.6 ± 10.8

Control

9.43 ± 0.05

0.27 ± 0.02

56.8 ± 10.4

111.5 ± 19.1

30

9.46 ± 0.21

0.30 ± 0.04

60.1 ± 12.0

147.1 ± 27.1

45

9.39 ± 0.14

0.33 ± 0.03

57.1 ± 5.1

113.8 ± 15.2

60

9.20 ± 0.24

0.34 ± 0.03

69.0 ± 5.7

119.2 ± 45.8

Control

9.43 ± 0.05

0.27 ± 0.02

56.8 ± 10.4

10

9.45 ± 0.05

0.23 ± 0.01

41.9 ± 11.3

20

9.39 ± 0.32

0.29 ± 0.04

63.2 ± 4.8

Ac ce

300 °C

Yolk Index

M

250 °C

Albumen pH

ed

180 °C

Process time (s)

pt

Infrared process temperature

-

30 Page 30 of 36

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Ac ce p

te

Figure 1. A schematic representation of the infrared processing unit (the lengths are reported in cm).

Page 31 of 36

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

Ac ce p

Figure 2. Demonstration of the denaturation initialization in the egg albumen.

Page 32 of 36

cr

ip t

4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 50

200

250

(a)

M

7.0 6.0

d

5.0 4.0

te

Log (N)

100 150 Process Time (s)

an

0

us

Log (N)

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

3.0

Ac ce p

2.0 1.0 0.0

0

20

40

60 80 Process Time (s)

100

120

(b)

Page 33 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

7.0 6.0

ip t

4.0

3.0

cr

Log (N)

5.0

2.0

us

1.0 0.0 20

6.0

50

60

70

(c)

d

5.0

te

4.0 3.0

Ac ce p

Log (N)

30 40 Process Time (s)

an

10

M

0

2.0 1.0 0.0

0

5

10 15 Process Time (s)

20

25 (d)

Figure 3. The decrease in the number of E.coli ATCC25922 cells by infrared treatment (a) 180 ˚C – 200 s (b) 250 ˚C – 110 s (c) 300 ˚C – 60 s and (d) 350 ˚C – 20 s.

Page 34 of 36

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

60

ip t

50

40

250 °C

30

cr

300 °C

20 10 0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

M

an

Process Time (s)

us

Average Surface Temperature (°C)

70

Ac ce p

te

d

Figure 4. Surface average temperature change of egg shell during far infrared processing at 250 and 300 ˚C.

Page 35 of 36

(a)

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

Far-infrared surface decontamination of whole-shell eggs...

(b)

Figure 5. Surface temperature images of the shell eggs infrared processed at (a) 250 ˚C for 90 s (b) 300 ˚C for 60 s.

Page 36 of 36