Surgical outcomes of infective endocarditis among intravenous drug users

Surgical outcomes of infective endocarditis among intravenous drug users

Accepted Manuscript Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis among Intravenous Drug Users Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD, Julius I. Ejiofor, MD, Maroun Yamm...

4MB Sizes 0 Downloads 49 Views

Accepted Manuscript Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis among Intravenous Drug Users Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD, Julius I. Ejiofor, MD, Maroun Yammine, MD, Masahiko Ando, MD, Janice M. Camuso, RN, Ilan Youngster, MD, Sandra B. Nelson, MD, Arthur Y. Kim, MD, Serguei I. Melnitchouk, MD, James D. Rawn, MD, Thomas E. MacGillivray, MD, Lawrence H. Cohn, MD, John G. Byrne, MD, Thoralf M. Sundt, MD PII:

S0022-5223(16)00432-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.072

Reference:

YMTC 10421

To appear in:

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Received Date: 12 October 2015 Revised Date:

24 January 2016

Accepted Date: 14 February 2016

Please cite this article as: Kim JB, Ejiofor JI, Yammine M, Ando M, Camuso JM, Youngster I, Nelson SB, Kim AY, Melnitchouk SI, Rawn JD, MacGillivray TE, Cohn LH, Byrne JG, Sundt TM, Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis among Intravenous Drug Users, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.072. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis among Intravenous Drug Users

2 Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD1,4*; Julius I. Ejiofor,MD2*; Maroun Yammine, MD2; Masahiko Ando, MD1

4

Janice M. Camuso, RN1; Ilan Youngster, MD3; Sandra B. Nelson, MD3; Arthur Y. Kim, MD3; Serguei I.

5

Melnitchouk, MD1; James D. Rawn, MD2; Thomas E. MacGillivray, MD1; Lawrence H. Cohn, MD2;

6

John G. Byrne, MD2 and Thoralf M. Sundt, MD1.

7

*Drs. Kim and Ejiofor contributed equally as the first authors to this work.

SC

RI PT

3

9

M AN U

8 Institutional affiliation:

10

1

Division of Cardiac Surgery and 3Division of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital,

11

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;

12

2

13

Massachusetts, USA;

14

4

15

of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

TE D

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,

EP

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College

AC C

16 17

Corresponding author:

18

Thoralf M. Sundt III

19

Address: Massachusetts General Hospital, Cox 652, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114

20

Tel: 617-643-9745; Fax: 617-726-5804 ; E-mail: [email protected]

21 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

22

Presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Seattle, WA,

23

April 25-29, 2015.

24 Total word count: 3403

26 Conflict of interest:

28

Dr. Thoralf M Sundt is a consultant for Thrasos Therapeutics

SC

27

RI PT

25

29 Funding source:

31

Dr. Joon Bum Kim was sponsored by AATS Graham Memorial Fellowship for this research

M AN U

30

AC C

EP

TE D

32

2

34

BWH = Brigham and Women’s Hospital

35

CI = confidence interval

36

HR = Hazard ratio

37

IE = infective endocarditis

38

IVDU = intravenous drug user

39

IV = intravenous

40

IQR = interquartile range

41

MGH = Massachusetts General Hospital

42

STS = Society for Thoracic Surgeons

SC

Abbreviations:

M AN U

33

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP AC C

44

TE D

43

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstracts

46

Background: With increasing prevalence of injection drug use in the United States, a growing number of

47

intravenous drug users (IVDU) are at risk for infective endocarditis (IE) that may require surgical

48

intervention, however, little data exist about clinical outcomes of these individuals.

49

Methods: We evaluated consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for active IE between 2002 and

50

2014 pooled from two prospective institutional databases. Death and valve-related events including

51

reinfection or heart valve reoperation, thromboembolism, and anticoagulation-related hemorrhage were

52

evaluated.

53

Results: Of the 436 patients identified, 78 (17.9%) were current IVDU. The proportion of IVDU

54

increased from 14.8% in 2002-2004 to 26.1% in 2012-2014. IVDU were younger (35.9±9.9 vs.

55

59.3±14.1yrs) and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors than non- IVDU. During follow-up (median, 29.4

56

mo; Quartile 1-3, 4.7-72.6 mo), adverse events among all patients included death in 92, reinfection in 42,

57

valve-reoperation in 35, thromboembolism in 17 and hemorrhage in 16. Operative mortality was lower

58

among IVDU (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06-0.71), but overall mortality was not significantly different (HR,

59

0.78; 95% CI, 0.44-1.37). When baseline profiles were adjusted by propensity score, IVDU had higher

60

risk of valve-related complications (HR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.95-7.49), P<0.001) principally attributable to

61

higher rates of reinfection (HR, 6.20, 95% CI, 2.56-15.00, P<0.001).

62

Conclusions: The proportion of IVDU among surgically treated IE patients is increasing. Although

63

IVDU have lower operative risk, long-term outcomes are compromised by reinfection.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

64

RI PT

45

65

Abstract word count: 230

66

Keywords: Intravenous drug use, infective endocarditis, valvular heart disease, operative risk

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Ultramini abstract

68

Among 436 adult patients with active endocarditis undergoing surgery, 78 (17.9%) were current

69

intravenous drug users. Although intravenous drug users had lower operative risk, reinfection (HR, 6.20,

70

95% CI, 2.56-15.00) and valve-related complications (HR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.95-7.49) were significantly

71

higher compared with non-drug users.

RI PT

67

72 (Word count: 45)

SC

73

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

74

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1. Introduction

76

Intravenous drug abuse is increasing rapidly in the United States. Use of heroin, the most common illicit

77

intravenous (IV) drug worldwide, almost doubled in the United States between 2006 and 2013 to 681,000

78

active users, with an estimated 169,000 people starting the drug in 2013.1 The majority of intravenous

79

drug users (IVDU) are young adults who find heroin less expensive and easier to obtain than prescription

80

opioids.1-3 The incidence of heroin-related deaths has surged during this same period as well, with nearly

81

6000 deaths recognized to be caused by heroin intoxication in 2013, a figure almost tripled from that of

82

2006.4 Consequently, this has become a major public health issue in the United States.

83

Of the many medical complications of drug abuse, infective endocarditis (IE) is particularly challenging

84

given the significant risk of acute mortality as well as social factors such as late recidivism and

85

reinfection. Overall, IE carries in-hospital and 1–year mortality rates of 10-20% and a nearly 40%,

86

respectively, even in the current era.5,6 Of those with IE, 60-70% will ultimately require heart valve

87

surgery, particularly those with resistant or highly virulent organisms as is common among IVDU-

88

associated IE.5-8 The decision to proceed with surgical treatment is further complicated among IVDU, as

89

reinfection of a prosthetic valve increases subsequent operative risk and diminishes the likelihood of

90

medical cure.9-12 Given an estimated incidence of IE among this population of 100–400 per 100,000

91

person-years, which is 50-100 times that of the population at large, and the increased prevalence of IDU

92

in the U.S., this is likely to be an increasingly common clinical conundrum.6, 7, 13-15

93

Enthusiasm for operative management of IE in IVDU in the surgical community is mixed, given

94

anecdotal experience of repeated recurrences attributable to continued use of IV drugs.16 Furthermore,

95

independent of reinfection, survival of IVDU is threatened by competing causes of mortality including

96

drug intoxication, trauma and suicide.8, 17-19 These issues raise questions about the utility versus futility of

97

aggressive, resource-intensive surgical procedures particularly among patients who are actively injecting

98

drugs.16,20 There are, however, limited data concerning the clinical characteristics and prognosis after

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

75

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

surgical therapy of these patients to inform clinical decision making and postoperative care.17,36 We

100

therefore sought to examine short- and long-term outcomes in the surgical management of IE among

101

IVDU patients in comparison to non-IVDU associated IE. In the interest of capturing an adequate sized

102

cohort, data were pooled from two closely associated tertiary academic centers in Boston, Massachusetts.

RI PT

99

103

2. Methods

105

-Study Population and Outcome Measures

106

The prospectively collected cardiac surgery databases of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and

107

the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) were queried to identify patients aged 17 years or older

108

undergoing heart valve operations due to active IE from January 2002 through August 2014. The disease

109

was considered active according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) definitions if the patient was

110

currently being treated for endocarditis.21 These two databases uniformly record baseline patient

111

characteristics, information on cardiac surgical procedures and perioperative outcomes according to STS

112

definitions. In addition, retrospective chart reviews were conducted to collect detailed information

113

regarding IVDU status and profiles on IE such as specific pathogens, characteristics of valvular lesions

114

and treatment details. IVDU currently engaging in IDU was defined as those who had injected in the past

115

12 months as suggested by prior studies.1,4,35

116

Follow-up information on individual patients was obtained through January 2015 by review of

117

longitudinal data from Partners Health Care system, the largest health care system in Massachusetts,

118

which maintains a centralized clinical data registry of all patient encounters within the system including

119

BWH and MGH.19 This data warehouse has been used for other clinical research and its coding data were

120

validated in several prior studies.23,24

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

104

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The primary outcome of interest was death and valve-related complications, the latter including

122

reinfection or reoperation of the heart valves, thromboembolic events, and anticoagulation-related

123

hemorrhage as defined by STS.25 Early mortality was defined as those occurring in-hospital or within 30

124

days of surgery. The diagnosis of valvular reinfection was based on one of the following criteria as

125

suggested by STS guidelines: (1) findings on reoperation with evidence of abscess, paravalvular leak,

126

frank pus, or vegetation confirmed as secondary to infection by histologic or bacteriologic studies; or (2)

127

meeting of the Duke Criteria for endocarditis in the absence of reoperation.25 Thromboembolic

128

complications including neurological (stroke or transient ischemic attack) or peripheral embolic events

129

producing signs or symptoms caused by the obstruction of a peripheral artery were diagnosed clinically.

130

Diagnosis of septic pulmonary embolism was made by the findings on enhanced computed tomography

131

of the chest when clinically suspected particularly in cases with IE involving right-sided heart valve.

132

Anticoagulation-related hemorrhage was defined as requiring transfusion, unplanned hospital admission,

133

or a hemostatic intervention.25 Early-, intermediate- and late-onset of recurrent IE were defined as those

134

occurred within 30 days, between 30-and 360 days, and beyond 360 days of surgery based on the current

135

practice guidelines.7

136

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Partners Healthcare, which

137

encompasses the MGH and the BWH. The requirement for informed consent from individual patients was

138

waved due to the retrospective nature of the study design.

139

-Statistical Analysis

140

Categorical variables, presented as frequencies and percentages, were compared using the χ2 test or

141

Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables, expressed as mean±SD or median with range (or Quartile 1-3),

142

were compared using Student’s unpaired t test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Annual trends in proportions

143

of IVDU among surgical patients with infective endocarditis were tested by Chi-square test for linearity.

144

Kaplan–Meier curves were used to plot the survival and freedom from adverse events. Log-rank tests

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

121

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

were used to compare the differences in the time-related outcomes between groups. Given the significant

146

differences in demographic and clinical risk profiles between the two groups of patients in favor of IVDU

147

group, we assumed that relative risks of deaths may differ across early and late postoperative periods. To

148

address this issue, landmark mortality analyses were performed split into two intervals: 90 days or less

149

and more than 90 days following surgery. 26 To adjust for baseline risk profiles between IVDU and non-

150

IVDU in the evaluations of outcomes, we performed propensity score analysis. The propensity scores

151

were calculated by multiple logistic regression analysis that included baseline variables shown in Table 1

152

and 2. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated with C statistics (C=0.936) and Hosmer-

153

Lemeshow statistics (P=0.275), respectively. Propensity score matching yielded only 33 pairs of patients,

154

therefore we conducted a covariate adjustment with propensity score rather than using the propensity

155

score as a matching tool. With this technique, propensity scores were incorporated into Cox proportional

156

hazard models as a covariate as well as IVDU status to calculate the propensity-adjusted hazard ratio

157

(HR). Cox-proportional hazard models were used with robust standard errors that accounted for the

158

clustering of center. The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed by examination of log (-

159

log[survival]) curves and by testing of partial (Schoenfeld) residuals and no relevant violations were

160

found.

161

Since defining IVDU depended heavily on patients’ own reports, we assumed that there was potential

162

uncertainty in classifying IVDU status. In order to account for potential impacts of underestimation of

163

current IVDU, a sensitivity analysis was performed. For this analysis, we randomly sampled 3% of

164

patients in the non-IVDU to reclassify them as IVDU and recalculated HRs for clinical endpoints. This

165

procedure was repeated for 100 times to obtain averaged HRs and 95% CIs. We gradually increase the

166

proportions of reclassified patients from 3% to 70% of all non-IVDU, and evaluated how this

167

reclassification influenced on overall HRs.

168

A 2-tailed P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with the

169

use of R statistical software, version 3.1.2.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

145

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

170

3. Results

172

-Baseline Characteristics

173

There were 436 patients meeting the enrollment criteria from the two centers (MGH, n=192; BWH,

174

n=244). Overall, 78 patients (17.9%) were IVDU currently engaging in IDU with the proportion

175

significantly increasing during the study period (P=0.048, Figure 1), particularly after 2012 (14.8% to

176

26.1%, P=0.006). Documented drugs of use included heroin only in 33, cocaine only in 18, combined

177

heroin and cocaine in 19, heroin or cocaine combined with other IV drugs in 5, amphetamine in 2 and

178

polysubstance in 1 with others unknown.

179

The baseline profiles of patients according to current IVDU status are summarized in Table 1. Overall,

180

compared with non-IVDU patients, IVDU were younger and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors (e.g.

181

diabetes, hypertension, renal dysfunction, EuroSCORE II). They presented more frequently, however,

182

with current cigarette smoking, embolic events, large vegetations, and right-sided and multiple valvular

183

involvement. There were no significant differences in gender and race/ethnicity. Causative pathogens

184

including the rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection were similar (11.5% in IVDU

185

[9/78] and 8.4% in non-IVDU [30/358], P=0.38) between the two groups.

186

Surgical profiles of patients are detailed in Table 2. Overall, 99 patients (22.7%) underwent emergent

187

surgery and 21 (4.8%) had intra-aortic balloon pumps placed before surgery. Valves were repaired in 45

188

(10.3%). Replacements were with mechanical prostheses in 99 (22.7%), bioprostheses in 206 (47.2%) or

189

human allografts (homografts) in 86 (19.7%). There were no significant differences between IVDU and

190

non-IVDU in operative profiles. All patients received at least 4-6 weeks of IV antibiotic therapy

191

regardless of IVDU status

192

-Outcome: Overall Cohort

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

171

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Thirty-day mortality rates were lower in IVDU than non-injectors (3.8% vs. 13.7%, P=0.012).

194

Late Follow-up data derived from the Partners database was complete in 76.4% of the entire cohort with a

195

median duration of 29.4 months (Quartile 1-3; 570 patient-years). Completeness of follow-up was lower

196

in IVDU than in the non-injector group (73.5% vs. 77.1%), but without statistical significance (P=0.096).

197

Major adverse events for the entire cohort in the form of valve-related complications were known to occur

198

in 69, including recurrence of IE in 42, valve reoperation in 35, thromboembolism in 17 and

199

anticoagulation-related hemorrhage in 16. (Table 3) Kaplan-Meier curves did not show a significant

200

difference in overall survival rates between IVDU and non-injectors; however, freedom from valve-

201

related complications were significantly lower among IVDU, mainly attributed to higher rates of

202

reinfection and reoperation compared with non-injectors (Figure 3).

203

Overall 5- and 10-year-survival rates were 78.9±6.0% and 69.5±8.3% in IVDU, respectively; and

204

76.1±2.6% and 68.7±3.9% in non-injectors, respectively (P=0.39). When adjusted by propensity score,

205

IVDU tended to have lower risk of early mortality (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-1.36; P=0.13 for 90-day death)

206

but with higher risk of late mortality (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.78-5.48; P=0.14) compared with non-IVDU,

207

however, they were statistically insignificant.

208

Five-and 10-year-survival rates free of valve-related events were 40.9±7.5% and 6.9±6.2% among IVDU,

209

respectively; and 63.9±3.3% and 50.8±4.9% in non-injectors (P=0.006). After propensity score

210

adjustments, risks of valve related complications were significantly higher in IVDU compared with non-

211

injectors (HR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.95-7.49; P<0.001), which was mainly stemmed from a higher risk of

212

reinfection and consequent reoperations (Table 3).

213

-Outcomes: IVDU Subgroup

214

Among early IVDU IE survivors (n=75), 28 patients (37.3%) had known reinfection of the valves at a

215

median of 18.1 months (range 0.2-54.3 months) following valve surgery. Among these, 1 (3.6%) occurred

216

within 30 days, 9 (32.1%) between 30 days and 1 year, and 18 (64.3%) more than 1 year after surgery.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

193

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Causative organisms of the reinfections were viridans group Streptococci in 6 (21.4%), methicillin-

218

susceptible Staphylococci in 5 (17.9%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococci in 4 (14.3%), Enterococci in 2

219

(7.1%) and fungus in 2 (7.1%) while 9 patients (32.1%) showed culture-negative results. Overall, only 6

220

patients (21.4%) were found to have the same causative organisms as at initial presentation.

221

Of the 28 patients with reinfection, 14 underwent surgery and 14 were treated with antimicrobial therapy

222

only. The reasons for medical therapy in the latter 14 patients were presence of intracranial hemorrhage in

223

3 (31.4%), prohibitive surgical risk due to severity of illness in 2 (14.3%), active in-hospital use of IV

224

drugs in 3 (31.4%) and cardiac arrest during preparation for operation in 1 (7.1%). Another 5 patients

225

(35.7%) were successfully treated medically with complete resolution of IE. Among those treated

226

surgically there were no early surgical deaths although one patient died of intracranial hemorrhage at 46.7

227

months postoperative. The median duration of antimicrobial therapy in the 14 patients who had only

228

medical therapy was 6.0 weeks (range 3-12 weeks) with 3 in-hospital deaths (21.4%) and 3 late deaths

229

(21.4%). Causes of the early deaths were sepsis in 2 and ventricular arrhythmia in 1, and the causes of late

230

deaths were repeated recurrence of IE in 2 and sudden death in 1. The 5-year survival rates among

231

surgical and medical therapy patients for recurrent IE in IVDU were 91.7±8.0% and 38.9±16.7%,

232

respectively (P=0.066, Supplemental Figure 1). Reoperative valve operations were undertaken for reasons

233

other than reinfection in 6 other patients (7.7%) for insufficiency of a repaired valve (n= 2) or structural

234

deterioration of a prosthetic valve (homograft [n=3] or xenograft bioprostheses [n=1]).

235

Overall, 11 late deaths (14.1%) occurred in IVDU. Causes of deaths were recurrence of IE in 6,

236

intracranial hemorrhage in 1 and metastatic lung cancer in 1 while causes could not be specified in 3

237

patients: one died suddenly and two died of unknown causes, one was found dead while actively using

238

heroin.

239

-Sensitivity Analysis

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

217

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Because of the challenges associated with determining with certainty the IVDU status of all patients in the

241

study, we undertook a sensitivity analysis of the impact of misclassification as illustrated in Figure 3. The

242

forest plots indicate adjusted HRs for valve-reinfection according to the increasing proportion of

243

reclassified patients from non-IVDU to IVDU (3% to 70%). For valve-reinfection, significantly increased

244

risks are observed up to 50%, while the proportion of reclassification that would be required to account

245

for the observed increased risk of reinfection would be at least 60%.

246

4. Discussion

247

Our study confirms an increase in the proportion of IVDU amongst surgical patients with active IE,

248

almost doubling during the study interval. This is consistent both with our clinical impression and the

249

virtual epidemic of increasing IV drug use in the general population as reported by the Center for Disease

250

Control.1 Perhaps more unexpectedly to us, the data also showed a markedly lower operative risk among

251

IVDU than non-IVDU. This is likely in part because the former were typically 25 years younger and had

252

fewer comorbidities compared to the non-injectors. Another potential factor may be surgical selection

253

bias, as we did not capture all patients seen with IE and cannot therefore account for those who were not

254

accepted for surgical intervention. It is possible that a subset of extremely ill individuals were not offered

255

surgery.

256

Despite superior early survival, late outcomes when corrected for age and other factors by propensity

257

score were worse for IVDU than non-IVDU, with higher rates of reinfection and reoperation. This is

258

likely a reflection of the challenge of recidivism among IVDU, although actual data concerning recurrent

259

drug use are hard to come by. Individuals may well not be forthright in responding to this sensitive

260

question when presenting with IE after valve surgery for IVDU-related IE out of concern that this will

261

impact the enthusiasm of clinicians to reoperation once again. The same may be true of family members.

262

Furthermore, unless a drug screen returns positive, the responses cannot be readily verified.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

240

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Our findings of a rising incidence of IVDU-associated IE are consistent with a recent Swedish nationwide

264

cohort study of 7603 patients with IE, 990 of whom were treated surgically.6 In that study, the 30-day

265

mortality remained constant at around 10% over the decade of the study indicating that despite general

266

medical progress in the current era, IE remains a highly lethal condition. Overall, in contrast to our study,

267

the absolute mortality at 5 years follow-up was lower for the 355 IVDU than for non-injectors, when

268

compared to age- and gender-matched general population, however, IVDU showed a Standardized

269

Mortality Ratio of 19.1 (95% CI, 13.5–27.1) which was much higher than other subgroups (Standardized

270

Mortality Ratio range, 1.8-6.3). Similarly, Rabkin and colleagues observed markedly lower long-term

271

survival among IVDU than non-IVDU patients and, conversely, less frequent re-infection .17 The reasons

272

for this difference is a matter of speculation, however it is clear that the socioeconomic aspects of IVDU

273

are rapidly changing in this country, with heroin use markedly up among the middle class or wealthy.37

274

This may translate into greater access to healthcare should use recur. It should be noted that this

275

disappointing long-term survival of IVDU has been demonstrated independent of IE. Many IV drug

276

initiators become chronic users, and survival is significantly compromised should they not resolve IDU.

277

27-30

278

population with an average loss of life of 18.3 years.27,29 Although one study indicated IE as the most

279

common cause of death among IVDU,28 other studies showed drug overdose, accident, violence and other

280

chronic disease such as AIDS and liver cirrhosis as competing leading causes of death in these

281

individuals.27,29-31

282

The combination of anticipated short life expectancy despite young chronologic age and the perceived

283

high risks of treatment failure and recurrence of the disease after surgery challenge many front line health

284

care providers as an ethical controversy .16,20 Despite the growing incidence of IDU, current practice

285

guidelines do not address surgical indications or management strategies for active IVDU specifically and

286

treating physicians are left to formulate therapeutic plans on an individual basis without much hard

287

evidence in the literature. The results of this present study help to fill that evidence gap. These data

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

263

AC C

EP

The mortality rate among long-term IVDU has been shown to be 6.9 times greater than the general

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

suggest that for IVDU actively injecting, the technical exercise of replacing the infected valve(s)

289

combined with antimicrobial therapy can be performed at low perioperative risk, but may be incomplete

290

therapy without the addition of effective addiction treatment. It is apparent that resolution or minimization

291

of post-operative IDU would likely improve outcomes for this population via prevention of late re-

292

infection just as discontinuation of tobacco use may improve outcomes after coronary revascularization.

293

From a surgical standpoint, failure to resolve IDU is comparable to leaving the nidus of infection behind

294

as shown by a 10-year event-free survival rate of only 6.9±6.2% among IVDU. Given the very high

295

recidivism rate of IDU, insistence by treating clinicians on agreement by the subject to participation in a

296

drug rehabilitation program might be a reasonable consideration. Consultation to institutional ethics

297

committee may also be appropriate when making a decision to undertake surgery in active IVDU who

298

refuse to enter a drug rehabilitation program and are likely to remain at high risk to re-infect their valve.

299

In one of our institutions (MGH) consultation with an addiction counselor has become standard routine at

300

the time of surgical consultation for IE in IVDU.

301

Finally, we observed Staphylococcus aureus as the most common pathogen of IE among IVDU and right-

302

side valve involvement to be more common in IVDU than non-IVDU as has been reported previously.32-34

303

Unlike earlier prior reports we found left-sided valve involvement predominant among IVDU who

304

undergo surgery.34 This is consistent with the findings of Rabkin and colleagues and may be a reflection

305

of a shift in surgical philosophy away from intervention on right sided lesions in favor of antimicrobial

306

therapy and the implantation of a prosthetic makes any subsequent infection an even more complicated

307

problem.17 The poor late outcomes in IVDU could not be attributed to differences in the virulence or type

308

of organism.

310

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

309

RI PT

288

-Limitations

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

This study has inherent limitations in the retrospective nature of the research. Study subjects are affected

312

by surgical selection bias since only patients accepted for surgery were included and those who received

313

medical therapy only were not, nor was there a medical treatment only control group for comparison.

314

Obtaining reliable follow-up data concerning reinfection and valve-related complications in this patient

315

population was also challenging. As this group is the most challenging in follow-up, the data are likely

316

biased in favor of lower event rates in this subgroup. Finally, the data set represents the experience of

317

urban tertiary academic referral centers, and therefore, it is subject to referral bias from the community.

318

- Conclusions

319

The proportion of IVDU among surgical patients with IE is increasing. Although IVDU are younger, with

320

lower baseline cardiovascular risk burdens, long-term clinical outcomes are discouraging with a

321

significant rate of reinfection and a trend toward higher risk of late mortality. These data highlight the

322

need to aggressively address the expanding drug use epidemic that is driving the increased rate of IE in

323

this population and provide effective addiction treatment post-operatively to prevent re-infection.

M AN U

References

326

1.

AC C

Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

328

Administration, 2014.

329 2.

Hooten WM, Bruce BK. Beliefs and attitudes about prescribing opioids among healthcare

providers seeking continuing medical education. J Opioid Manag.;7(6):417-424.

331

333

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-48, HHS

327

332

EP

325

TE D

324

330

SC

RI PT

311

3.

Slevin KA, Ashburn MA. Primary care physician opinion survey on FDA opioid risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. J Opioid Manag.;7(2):109-115. 16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

334

4.

Trends in Drug-poisoning Deaths Involving Opioid Analgesics and Heroin: United States, 1999–

335

2012. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

336

(http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/drug_poisoning/drug_poisoning.htm). 5.

Chu VH, Park LP, Athan E, et al. Association between surgical indications, operative risk, and

RI PT

337 338

clinical outcome in infective endocarditis: a prospective study from the international

339

collaboration on endocarditis. Circulation. ;131(2):131-140.

and long-term prognosis in infective endocarditis in Sweden. PLoS One.8(7):e67519.

341

342

Ternhag A, Cederstrom A, Torner A, Westling K. A nationwide cohort study of mortality risk

SC

6.

7.

M AN U

340

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of

343

Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American

344

Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation.;129(23):e521-643.

345

8.

Shih CJ, Chu H, Chao PW, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of major adverse cardiac events in survivors of infective endocarditis: a nationwide population-based study.

347

Circulation.;130(19):1684-1691. 9.

Grubitzsch H, Schaefer A, Melzer C, Wernecke KD, Gabbieri D, Konertz W. Outcome after

EP

348

TE D

346

surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis and the impact of preoperative treatment. J Thorac

350

Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):2052-2059.

351

10.

endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5):S1754-1757.

353

355

Lytle BW, Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Svensson LG, Pettersson GB, Cosgrove DM, 3rd.

Reoperative cryopreserved root and ascending aorta replacement for acute aortic prosthetic valve

352

354

AC C

349

11.

Meszaros K, Nujic S, Sodeck GH, et al. Long-term results after operations for active infective endocarditis in native and prosthetic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1204-1210.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

356

12.

Musci M, Weng Y, Hubler M, et al. Homograft aortic root replacement in native or prosthetic

357

active infective endocarditis: twenty-year single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.

358

2010;139(3):665-673. 13.

1988-1990. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76(12):933-936.

360

361

Berlin JA, Abrutyn E, Strom BL, et al. Incidence of infective endocarditis in the Delaware Valley,

14.

RI PT

359

Hogevik H, Olaison L, Andersson R, Lindberg J, Alestig K. Epidemiologic aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population. A 5-year prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore).

363

1995;74(6):324-339. 15.

M AN U

364

SC

362

Spijkerman IJ, van Ameijden EJ, Mientjes GH, Coutinho RA, van den Hoek A. Human

365

immunodeficiency virus infection and other risk factors for skin abscesses and endocarditis

366

among injection drug users. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(10):1149-1154.

367

16.

DiMaio JM, Salerno TA, Bernstein R, Araujo K, Ricci M, Sade RM. Ethical obligation of surgeons to noncompliant patients: can a surgeon refuse to operate on an intravenous drug-

369

abusing patient with recurrent aortic valve prosthesis infection? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):1-8. 17.

Rabkin DG, Mokadam NA, Miller DW, Goetz RR, Verrier ED, Aldea GS. Long-term outcome

EP

370

TE D

368

for the surgical treatment of infective endocarditis with a focus on intravenous drug users. Ann

372

Thorac Surg. 2012;93(1):51-57.

373

18.

Infect Dis. 2007;39(3):197-204.

375

377

Thalme A, Westling K, Julander I. In-hospital and long-term mortality in infective endocarditis in

injecting drug users compared to non-drug users: a retrospective study of 192 episodes. Scand J

374

376

AC C

371

19.

Hubbell G, Cheitlin MD, Rapaport E. Presentation, management, and follow-up evaluation of infective endocarditis in drug addicts. Am Heart J. 1981;102(1):85-94.

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

378

20.

Hull SC, Jadbabaie F. When is enough enough? The dilemma of valve replacement in a recidivist intravenous drug user. Ann Thorac Surg. ;97(5):1486-1487.

379

21.

www.riskcalc.sts.org

381

22.

Murphy SN, Chueh HC. A security architecture for query tools used to access large biomedical databases. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:552-556.

23.

history of asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(5):1218-1225. 24.

Horkan CM, Purtle SW, Mendu ML, Moromizato T, Gibbons FK, Christopher KB. The

M AN U

384

385

Conrad MF, Michalczyk MJ, Opalacz A, Patel VI, LaMuraglia GM, Cambria RP. The natural

SC

382

383

RI PT

380

386

association of acute kidney injury in the critically ill and postdischarge outcomes: a cohort study*.

387

Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):354-364. 25.

26.

27.

Health. 1987;77(3):347-348.

393

394

28.

29.

399

Smyth B, Fan J, Hser YI. Life expectancy and productivity loss among narcotics addicts thirty-

three years after index treatment. J Addict Dis. 2006;25(4):37-47.

397

398

Perucci CA, Forastiere F, Rapiti E, Davoli M, Abeni DD. The impact of intravenous drug use on

mortality of young adults in Rome, Italy. Br J Addict. 1992;87(12):1637-1641.

395

396

Joe GW, Simpson DD. Mortality rates among opioid addicts in a longitudinal study. Am J Public

EP

392

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data : extending the Cox model. New York: Springer; 2000.

391

TE D

cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):732-738.

389

390

Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after

AC C

388

30.

Smyth B, Hoffman V, Fan J, Hser YI. Years of potential life lost among heroin addicts 33 years after treatment. Prev Med. 2007;44(4):369-374. 19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

31.

Drug Abuse Warning Network 2003 (09/2004 update).

401 32.

drug users: the time has come? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13(7):533-534.

403

404

DiNubile MJ. Abbreviated therapy for right-sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in injecting

33.

Hecht SR, Berger M. Right-sided endocarditis in intravenous drug users. Prognostic features in 102 episodes. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(7):560-566.

405

RI PT

402

DAWN 2003: Area profiles of drug-related mortality. Office of Applied Studies, SAMHSA.

SC

400

34.

407

involvement, bacteriologic findings, and outcome of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users.

408

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(15):1641-1648.

409

35.

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372(9651):1733-1745.

36.

Dawood MY, Cheema FH, Ghoreishi M, et al. Contemporary outcomes of operations for tricuspid

TE D

410

411

Mathew J, Addai T, Anand A, Morrobel A, Maheshwari P, Freels S. Clinical features, site of

M AN U

406

valve infective endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(2):539-546.

412

37. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/30/us/31heroin-deaths.html?_r=0 (accessed Jan 17,

414

2016)

AC C

EP

413

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics between IVDU and Non-IVDU Non-IVDU

(n=78)

(n=358)

Female gender, n (%)

30 (38.5)

Body mass index, kg/m2

26.7±7.9

M AN U

Ethnicity, n (%) White Black Hispanic

TE D

Asian Others

Hypertension

EP

Diabetes mellitus

59.3±14.1

<0.001

111 (31.0)

0.20

27.8±7.0

0.24

SC

35.9±9.9

Cigarette smoking history

Current cigarette smoking

NYHA functional class III or IV, n (%) On dialysis, n (%)

21

P value

RI PT

IVDU

Age, yr

AC C

415

0.83

68 (87.2)

319 (89.1)

5 (6.4)

14 (3.9)

1 (1.3)

9 (2.5)

1 (1.3)

5 (1.4)

3 (3.8)

11 (3.1)

6 (7.6)

74 (20.7)

0.027

16 (20.5)

225 (62.8)

<0.001

53 (67.9)

142 (39.7)

<0.001

28 (35.9)

29 (8.1)

<0.001

35 (44.9)

177 (49.4)

0.46

3 (3.8)

31 (8.7)

0.24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Creatinine clearance, mL/min/1.73m2

73.1±44.1

<0.001

Embolic events

36 (46.2)

107 (29.9)

0.006

Cerebral

21 (26.9)

93 (26.0)

0.86

15

Peripheral

RI PT

103.5±53.6

14

0.14

Causative pathogens, n (%) 16 (20.5)

89 (24.9)

SC

Viridans group streptococci

2 (2.6)

M AN U

Other streptococci

33 (9.2)

30 (38.5)

97 (27.1)

9 (11.5)

30 (8.4)

10 (12.8)

65 (18.2)

1 (1.3)

35 (9.8)

12 (15.4)

48 (13.4)

9 (11.5)

24 (6.7)

9 (11.5)

25 (7.0)

57 (73.1)

294 (82.1)

Aortic valve

32 (41.0)

200 (55.9)

Mitral valve

13 (16.7)

86 (24.0)

Tricuspid valve

12 (15.4)

8 (2.2)

Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistant

methicillin-resistant Entercococci

AC C

Negative culture

EP

Others

TE D

Staphylococci, coagulase-negative

Single valve affected, n (%)

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

64 (17.9)

13 (16.7)

54 (15.1)

Aortic + Tricuspid

3 (3.8)

6 (1.7)

Mitral + Tricuspid

5 (6.4)

Aortic + Mitral

0

Aortic +Mitral + Tricuspid

18 (5.0)

<0.001

Vegetation diameter ≥10mm, n (%)

55 (70.5)

178 (49.7)

<0.001

18 (23.1)

121 (33.8)

0.066

17 (21.8)

110 (30.7)

0.12

Severe dysfunction of affected valves, n (%)

59 (75.6)

245 (68.4)

0.21

Left ventricular ejection fraction, %

59.5±10.4

60.1±10.9

0.64

9.5±8.3

13.4±12.6

0.001

(1.8-42.0)

(1.8-82.9)

M AN U

TE D

AC C

EP

EuroSCORE II, % (range)

SC

20 (25.6)

Prosthetic endocarditis, n (%)

417

2 (0.6) 2 (0.6)

Right-side valve involvement

Abscess formation, n (%)

416

0.068

RI PT

21 (26.9)

Multiple valves affected, n (%)

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Surgical Profiles Non- IVDU

(n=78)

(n=358)

Emergent surgery

16 (20.5) 3 (3.8)

On IABP

M AN U

Primary procedure

6 (0-140)

0.098

83 (23.2)

0.61

18 (5.0)

>0.99

SC

7 (0-76)

P value

RI PT

IVDU

Interval from admission to surgery, days

0.87

10 (12.8)

35 (9.8)

18 (23.1)

81 (22.6)

35 (44.9)

171 (47.8)

15 (19.2)

71 (19.8)

2 (2.6)

20 (5.6)

0.27

10 (12.8)

56 (15.6)

0.60

Aortic root replacement

19 (24.4)

96 (26.8)

0.78

Cardiopulmonary bypass time, min

191.3±103.8

215.5±142.0

0.34

Cardiac ischemic time, min

145.9±85.3

159.3±97.8

0.30

Valve repair Valve replacement, mechanical Valve replacement, bioprostheses

Associated procedures

TE D

Valve replacement, allograft

CABG

EP

Ascending Aorta replacement

AC C

418

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

419

Abbreviations: IABP, intra-aortic balloon pumping; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; ASD, atrial

420

septal defect; PFO, patent foramen ovale; VSD, ventricular septal defect; MAIVF, mitral-aortic inter-

421

valvular fibrosa.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

422

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 3. Unadjusted and Adjusted Clinical Outcomes According to Current Status of IV Drug Abuses Crude

Propensity-Adjusted

RI PT

No. of Events Non-IVDU

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

30-day mortality

1

40

0.10

0.01-0.48

0.026

0.15

0.01-1.01

0.10

90-day mortality

3

49

0.25

0.024

0.32

0.08-1.36

0.13

Late (> 90 days) mortality

10

30

Valve related complications

32

37

Valve Re-infection

28

14

Valve reoperation

18

Thromboembolism

7

Hemorrhage

5

M AN U

0.06-0.71 0.66-2.63

0.45

2.07

0.78-5.48

0.14

4.07

2.53-6.55

0.001

3.82

1.95-7.49

<0.001

9.28

4.87-17.68

<0.001

6.20

2.56-15.00

<0.001

17

5.03

2.58-9.82

0.005

3.66

1.44-9.30

0.006

10

2.92

1.11-7.68

0.030

2.54

0.62-10.47

0.20

11

1.75

0.60-5.05

0.30

4.33

1.03-18.17

0.045

TE D

1.32

EP

AC C

SC

IVDU

Abbreviations: IVDU, intravenous drug users; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure Legends Figure 1. Trends in proportions of IVDU among surgical patients with infective endocarditis over time.

RI PT

Abbreviation: IVDU, intravenous drug users. Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for clinical outcomes between IVDU and non-IVDU: Overall death (A), valve reinfection (B), valve reoperation (C) and composite of valve –related complications (D).

Transparent bands indicate area within 95% confidence interval. Abbreviation: IVDU, intravenous drug

SC

users.

M AN U

Figure 3. Effects of reclassification of non-IVDU patients to IVDU on hazard ratios for the risk of reinfection. Dots and horizontal lines indicate hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval, respectively. Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.

Supplementary Figure 1. Survival after surgical versus medical therapy for recurrence of infective

AC C

EP

TE D

endocarditis in intravenous drug users

27

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT