Curboh) d-ore Reward:, 53 (I 977) 57-66 $1 Else\ler Sc~~ot~fis Publlshlng Company,
Amslcrdan
Sk-THESIS
AND
OF
hlETHI’L
SOhlE
FUROIC
o-GLIJCOPYRANOSIDES.
HIGH-ENERGY
- Printed
In Belgium
THENOIC
AND
ESTERS
THEIR
OF
STABILITI’
THE TO
RADIATION
ABSTRACT
esters obtained
The \rirh.
respectively,
:1-, 4).
2-furoyl
5bromo-2-furoyl
S-methyl-3-rhenoyl
11: /3-, 12).
by complete
chloride
and
e.s.r. spectra of irradiated were examined substituted
(/IL, 5; x-.
(;I-. 9: /3-, IO),
%thiopheoexry!oyl
(2.Y x IO”’ eV/gjh)
irradiation
of methyl
6),
Z-theno;I
(irr.)
5-bromothlophenencq
lx-,
chloride
methyl Q- and rhr
o-glucopyrnno~idcs
nature
contain
chloride
chloride
13:
/;-.
in the solid state to 3 doage
to determIne
u-glucopyraoosidcs
C/i-. 1: I-. 21, 1-furanscrylogl
chloride chlorlds
esterlficatlon
(I-,
subjected
oi 7. I x IO”’ sV/g.
to Thz
and irr. esters I-14
damage:
one very strong doublet
3:
/I-, 8).
loyl chloride
1-I) \\ere
ranosldc
b-D-~lucop)
of the rndlstion
(/I-.
7:
tx-.
thwe
of the un-
and one very strong
indicating that cleavage of the C-I-O bond (doublet) and dehjdrogznation of the C-I-H bond (singlet) had occurred. The e.s.r. spectra of irr. furoares 1 and 2 conrain w-on? doubizts, but thosrl of -3-6 have none, shov.lng that the gl>cosldlc bonds singlet,
in the latter
are Ilighiy
stable
IO radiation
esters indicated initiaied
that
and those in 13 and glucopyranoside(\zry i$ere decreased sinzlels).
and
pyranoslde.
lofluencc
and 12 (strong 11 (very
Intramolecular of the energy.
on the localization
The e.s.r. spectra of the irr. thcooic
In 11 and
12 ore
those in 7-10
11 are more stable srrong doublet)
13. and
by dwiparion
bonds
ofdoublets).
for 7 ond 8 (vrnf II
may arl$e (roni
elycosidic _ _
(absence
clsn~ngr
(strong
s~nple~s). compared The
of energy
The anomeric of the energy.
iorm
9 and with
stable
radiation-
doublets).
dehydroscnatlon 10 (very
radialion
rexlions
wesk.
those of methyl stability
to the ester groups. of nxthyl
to
srable (peak
than that in methyl Q-D-
doublets)
singlets).
Won, 0 sinelets). _
highly
are faIrI)
Rodi2rlon-initiated.
\\ak
transfer
but those in 1 and 2 are stable
damage.
compared fo that in methyl a-D-glucopyranoside.
and
weak
z-D-@uCO-
of these ewrs and be follo\red
D-glucopyranoside
hr\s no
58
J.
A.
HARRIS,
1. C. ARTHUR,
JR., 0. HlNOJOSA,
G. J. BOUDRE4US,
E. R. hlCCALL
IKl-RODUCTION
We have reported and
o-glucosides’-4 trometry These
on the synthesis
of cellulose5,
to study intramolecular investigations
stability
of,
techniques
were
cellulose
thenoylated
methyl
of
the
spin
during
to synthesize,
and
stability
used electron
energy-transfer
extended
furoates6
to clucldation
and radiation
and
nature
of
radiolysis
and
2-thenoatzs’.
of aromatic
resonance
radiation
have
darnage
spec-
of these esters’.‘.
IO determine
M’c
esters of
(e.s.r.) the
radiation
now
applied
these
of
furoylated
and
D-glucopyranosides.
RISLILTS
The e 3.r. spectrum lery
strong doublet
singlet
(generated
irr. methyl
P-o-glucopyranoside (I)
spectrum
generated
and
by cleavage
is probnbly
(irr.)
by cleavage
bj dehydrogenntion
tetra-0-(I-furoyI)-Pdoublet
of Irradiated
(gwxrarsd
generated
ana
methyl fx-D-glucopyranosidc of the C-I-O
of the C-l-H
bond)
bond)‘.
contains one
and one wry
\vas the same as that of the Irr. ry anomcr. -x- (2)
a very
o-glucopyranoside
\+eak,
of the C-1-O by two
five-line
bond,
radxals:
rcjpccti\ely
spectrum.
whereas
The
triplet
of
Irr. methyl
gi\ e a strong,
doubler
the very weak,
a Lcry weak,
strong
The e.s.r. spectrum
spectrum
fi\e-lint:
spectrum
is
spectrum
(generated
hy
H dehydrogenatlon
of the
methyl
group
IO yield
-0-C)
and
a very
peak,
doublet
H
I
TABLE
RESONANCE SPECTRA OF IRRADIATED
CLECTRON-SPIN bfrTHbL
Merh,
FCIROIC ESTFRS
OF
D-GLUCOP~RAI*rO5lDE~
i D-ghoprranosrde
Conrpolrnd ItO.
No. of hes (tn vact10)~
l (vs)
a-
Lim ILldrh (/IIF)
p I’ulrr#
L.
2.0047
c
2.0040 20042
2 (Vj) +e:Iil-O-(l-TUiOyl)-B-
I
2 (5) 5 (\-=)
3nomer
2
2 (5) 5 (VW)
c
Tcln-U-(‘-~Jr~nacryloyl)-8-
3
I (3) 3 (5) I (5)
2.0 0.7
2.0030
I .9 c
2.0030
*
il anomr’r
-l
3 (9 Tclra-O-(S-hromo-_‘-illroyl)-G-
8x;Lnomer
I
I (Vi%)
14
_7.0045
6
I (VU)
I.4
1.OOJY
“Irrzhslea tn the sohd SKIW. h} 60Co ;-rxltuton to a dosage 01’7.1 * 10”’ eV!g. e~cpl ior compound a-, whtsh \~zY, tmdtaied IO a dosag oi 5.2 * IO’ 3 eV/g. biicy 5. arong; \. xer4. W. wcah =h!ain line. dCdsohlcd
for cectrr oispeclrum. ‘Lines oicrlappcd.
59
FUROIC AND THENOIC ESTERSOF D-GLUCOSIDES spectrum
(generated
furanac~loyl)-/3spectrum and
by
and a strong,
-I-
(6)
triplet
in Table
of the clearly
Irr. methyl
doublet
and a weak.
?-thiophcneacryloyl)-zspectra.
It-r.
pyranoside recorded
TABLE
methyl
(9)
in Table
weak,
spectra.
the center
or very weak,
(10) singlet
II. were almost
For
are also recorded
srnglet spectrum.
D-plucopyranoside
all
(-5)
of ihe
spectrum.
Irr.
doublet
methyl
spectrum
value.
mrrhyl
strong, (14)
tetra
doublet
-p-
singlet D-gluco-
and a very strong
in Table
I.
tetra-O-(5bromo-
and
the same as the free-electron
e.s.r.
respectively
gerxrate
for the center of the respecrwc
e.s.r. spectra are also recorded
Irr.
Irr.
in Table
give a weak
(12) D-glucopyranosidc tetra-O-(3-thiophcneacryloyl)-x(13)
resolved.
stnglet
of the respective
-/I-
a strong,
terra-O-(3-
a strong,
the same as the free-electron
e.s.r. spectra
and a very weak.
generate
methyl gve
(7) and +I?- (8) D-glucopyranoslde
and $5
(11) and
Irr.
tetra-0-(5bromo-7-furoyl)-/3-
singlet
for
I. iieere almost
The g values, calculated
of the clearly
bond).
respectively
Irr. methyl
resolved,
spectrum
respectively
spectrum.
C-5-O
calculated
tetra-0-(Z-thenoyl)-r-
0-(5methyl-2-thenoyI)-rspectrum
the
give very
the ,g values.
and recorded
The line width give a kieak,
of
spectrum.
D-&rlucopyranostde
D-glucopyranosides. spectrum
clcsvage
(3) and -II- (‘4) D-glucopyranoside
singlet
e.s.r. spectrum
and
value. The line \vidths II.
It
ELECTRON-SPIN
RESONANCE
SPE(TIR?\
OF IR%ADIAiiD
THEVOlC
ESTERS OF
I (vs) :! (\3)
c
2.QoJ7
I 0%)
d
1.0033
c
1.0033
I (\S) 1 (b$) 2 fw)
c
2.005?
I (VW)
c
3.0051
I.2 I.?. I.2 c
x047 3.0048
I.2 c
2.0030
METHkL D-GLUCOPYR\NGSIDEh=
Corr?polrrrd ml. I-
Te:Lr;L-O-(l-thenoyl:-1-
1. (w) I (VW) 7, (w)
@ anomer
/3 anomer
IO
I (4 2 (w) Tetn-O-(5bromo-2lhiopheneacDloyl)-z/3 anomer Tefr~-O-(2-thiophene~crylo}I)-x-
II I2
13 1-l
2 0030
lo a dosage of 7.1 x lO-‘O cV/g. exczpr for compound “IITXII~W~ io the solid 5131e by boCo y-radlallon a. uhlsh WE, lrradlated IO 3 dosage oi 5.2 x lOi cV/g. “Key: s. srroog: v. \cry; w, weah. ’ hlain Ilne. “Calculrlted for cenlcr oi speclrum. ‘Lmes o\srlapprd.
60
J. A. HAR.RI.5. J. C. ARTHUR,
Stable
free-radicals
pyrsnojides.
The
y-radiation
to
nonlocalized,
were formed
mechanism
the
The
2-Furovl
bonds,
spectrum, given
and
hq irr.
that
groups
D-glucopyranosik
iveal,. sinslet, compsrcd
irr.
methyl
The
presence
carbohvdrate
that indicated
localization
molecule.
2-Thcnoyl
and
spectrum,
singlet
e.5.r.
radiation-inltinted doublet,
and
clcs\age
singlet
groups or
totally
(generation
than
3 the
spectrum,
form groups
tn the carbohydrate
the
a very as
of the methyl on the locnlimolecules.
on the msrh) I D-,olucop> ranosides of
the
secondary 7 and
(compounds
than
protected of only
of dsh)drogenntion.
anomeric
of these furoyl
that
gilen
(compounds
pljcojldlc
e.3 r. spaztrum.
triplet
electrons 8)
bonds and dehydrogenation
respcctlvely.
5-hlethjl-3-theno>l
respectively.
v.enher
low extent
groups
groups
clra\ayc of plycosldic
of
groups (compounds
6) almost
The
the sncrky
radlatlon-initiated pyrsnoGde).
a \rry
Axirons
thrnoyl of
clen\sge
bonds. and decreased
and
degrndatlon
a-D-glucopyranoside).
of substituted
the
D-gluco-
(\\eakrsr-doublet
e.s r. spectrum.
spectrum
ronosides
and dehydro,ocnarion.
the radiation-initiated
5 and
radtanon
of the high-energy
respectively).
8X-D-glUCOpgranOSide).
did not change the intluence
of the ener,? intiucnced
e.s.r.
of
in the methyl
2-Furonnc~lo~l
(compounds
from
e s.r. spectrum
\sith
D-glucopyrsnoside zntion also
of doublet
of
In formation
clcs\age ofglgcosidic
bond
cleavage of ,ol}cosidic
and
localizarion
strong sinslet,
the deh>drogenation triplet
given by trr. methyl
5Bromo-2-furojl
methvl
plus
doublet
high-cner,oy,
merh! I D-glucop>
on
of the glqco$dlc
dwrcxed
D-gluco-
random
The
resulted
the electrons
82-D-glucopgrano5ids).
(absence
than
groups of
1 and 2) decreased
radiation-initiated
dchydrogenatlon respectively.
furoyl
significantly
mz’thql
and 1) eliminated
electron;3.
an e.s.r. spectrum indicating
In cleavage
and very ~enk
inirially
a-D-glucopyranoside
of the cnrrsy
and rcsulrcd
incident,
by the
sod \ery
E. R. hlcCALL
esters of methyl
probably,
of high-energy
substltured
groupb (compound5
glycosidic that
of
Ci. J. BOtiDREALis,
furoic
\vas.
(very suon, 0 doublet
the localization
pyranosldcs.
molecule
that generated
presence
rnfluenced
Hl?‘iOJOS\.
the 105s of energ
in merh>l
bonds and deh)drogenntioo
0.
in irradiated,
by generation
of these electrons
stable free-radicals
e.s.r
of
carbohydrate
follovcd
the energ
JR.,
bonds
respectively.
by irr.
on
the
decreased
the
(weaker doublet, methyl
4r-~-gluco-
101 also decreased
9 and aud
deh>drogeuation
than
that
giLen
by
the
(i\eaher irr.
mcth]I
I-D-giucopyranoside). 5Bromo-2-thiophcnexrylcyl radiation-initiated (absence that
oFdoublet
giLen
pounds
by irr.
13 and
(weaher-doublet The
intensities
bonds
and decreased
and a weaker
r-D-_elucopyranoslde).
11) decreased e.s.r. spectra differ
11 and
,nroups (compounds of slycojidic
e.s r. spectrum. methyl
L’.S r. spectra
D-glucopyranosldes relate
clesvqe
singlet spectrum, 2-Tluophrnescn
the radtatlon-initiated
cleavage
than that given by irr. methyl
recorded from
of the doublers
for
irr.
furoic
those
for
the
and singlets
12) ellminsted
irr.
and
respectively, loyl
groups
of glycosidic
than (cornbonds
8r-D-glucopyranoside).
thenoic
methyl
the
the deh}drogcnation
esters of the
D-glucopyranosides.
in the e.s.r. spectra
recorded
methyl The for the
FUROIC
irr.
AND
THENOIC
ESTERS OF D-GLUCOSIDES
D-glucopyranosidcs
decreases
clea\agr
the
Indlcrlrr
that
the
of the gl>cosldic
61
presence
bonds
and
of
furoyl
and
tkno>l
the deh>drogenatlon
groups
reaclions
of
the D-plucopyranoades. The locnlvatlon
of energy 15 probably
of energy.
partlcuiarly
or rhenoyl
goups,
or selsctlw
iurovl
or rhenoyl
accr~t
the energy.
dissiparsd
the locallzalion
groups,
of
of the group
Irracila[cd
and
rhenoic
e\ci~ed
causing
intramolecular
groupsj
gl>co>idic
hair
sbjtems bond
appcnr
tv
electrons
by the
should
he able
to
could
be
clcn~a~r:
sho\\n
etTccts an
trrlnsfx
to the furoyi
the energ)
Slmikr
bsn
Thcsc
corboh>draies
rlcctron~
>~atrls; ihen,
D-~iucop>ranoside.
by tluorescena’.3.
substlrutcd
rr-elecrron
Furoic
nlrrt?yl
aromatic
through
of energy of the secondary
detincd.
v,ithout
thr? sut?>tlIuIed
5Lructures (for eximpk. SINK
well
as heni or lighr,
genntlon
absorption
or borh.
to form
zifectcd
of energy of secondary
and
t)p?s
dehydro-
of n-electron
10 dc~~ct~~a~e Ihe. ckiilrd locallzallon
L~2 characLcri>tlc
uf energy
lor
groups
b>
ha> Ins
slructures’.‘-’
EYPERlhlTNT,\L
Gtw~v-~l. -
hlelrln~
were not corrected. 621
i r.
for
merh~lsilanc
solutions
v:crc detcrmlned
Nuclear standard.
probe.
pure, and In Ihe form of
conducted
In the SRRC
Pyre\
dostmetq”.
lubes
rmnjferred recorded
at
to
a lotal
solid
@“Co radiation
po\\ders
source”.
oi
A-60
-
3-furznacrbllc
acid
spectra \\lth
\pcc1romcter
were tetra-
cqu~pped
\icrc
Irrndlalwns
\\ere
M hich had a dose rate. determined sa~nples
The
NCIC
Irradiated
Irradiated
b!,
in air
samplcj
In
\\ere
e.5 r. speara
The
b>jrcni,
Liere in chc form of
lint.
2-Furnnacryloyl (m.p.
and
hlod?l
D-glucop~ranos~Je~
u hell Irradlnred.
7.1 x IO”’ evig.
of the absorpllon
fnrerllrcciiafL~s
(n m.r.)
trmpcrarurc,
The suhsriruled
of 1.S n 1O’0 e\‘ig, h. The dosage
room
in a dry bo\ from the Pyrea to quartz tubes. ~\ith a I’arlan -1502-15 EPR spcctromacr -25;
the first dcrl\arlvc of
re>onanc‘r: at
apparatus
wirh n Perbin-Elmer
by usms ;1 I’arlnn
variable-temperature
chcmlcslly ierrous-ferric
msgntxic
in deuleriochloroform
as the internal
a L’-60-H)
In n Fisher-Johns
(1.r.) spccrrcl \jc‘re rscordcd
spcctrophoromcrcr+.
determined wlih
points
Infrared
I-II’-:
chlorlJe 41 8,
t1.a~ prepared
0.30 rnok)
and
b\
boiling
Ihion)
a solution
I clllorlilc
I 53 g,
0.15 mole) In dry benzene (I 20 ml) ior 20 h under a reflu\ condenser tcalciunl chlorldr: tube). ihe solution ~a3 evaporawd to dryness at 35 torr. dnd Lhe rzjiduc \‘.a~ Jisrilkd at 7%SI”/O.45
torr. The Jibtlllate,
had m.p. S-31
5Bromo-?-furobl furolc
(90 ml)
xld
obtained
In 90 1,, y~&l.
sohdltied
on sranding.
and
‘. chloride
(33 g, 0.16 mole)
for 20 h under
rellu\.
\\a~
and anti
prepared
Ihionbl
by boiling
chloride
then elaporatlng
a soiurion
(26 g. 0.22 mole) to dryness
of
5-bromo-2-
In dry
benzene
at 60 IO.5 torr.
The
62
J. A. HARRIS, I. C. ARTHUR, JR., 0. FiINOJUSA, Q. J. BOUDRENJX, E. R. M&ALL
residue was distilled under vacuum; a fraction having b.p. 78-8 lo/Z5 torr was : : cjoller=teb~,gg~~~~l~;:~.~~~860ss; .. ‘. ” S;Mti~l-24moy1 chlotide was prepared by boiling a ~solutim of 5-methyl2=tl&$&n&&oxylic acid @Og; W4 mole) and thionyI chloride (25 g; 0.21 mole) in dry. bemene -(1’00rhl) for *V17 h under re&, and thenwapurating at W/O.5 torr to reinave the bbmme and the exms of thionyl chloride. The residue was distilled, and a fmction.having b.p, 160”/30torrwas Wetted (21 g, yield 93%); this solid&d at 25”. 2-Th13oylchloride was prepared by boiling a mixture of 2-thiopheaecarboxylic acid (Zs g, 0.20 mole) and thionyi chloride (35 g, 0.29 mole) in dry benzene (100 ml) for h 17 h under reflux, and then evapdratingat 60”/0,5 torr, to remove the benzene and the excess of thionyl chloride, The residue was distilled, and a fraction having b.p. 144-146”/30tom was collected; this solidified at 25” (24 g, yield 85%). 2-Thiopheneacryloyl chloride was prepared by boiling a mixture of 2-thiopheneacryIic acid (25 g, 0.16 mole) and thionyl chloride (30 g, 0.25 mole) in dry benzene (IOOmI) for H 17h under reflux, and then evaporating at 6WiO.5torr, to remove the &nzene and the excess of thionyl chloride. The residue was distilled, and a fraction having b.p. lnO_103”/0.2torr was collected that solidified at 25” (24 g, yield 85%), 5-Bromo-2=thiopheneacryloyl chloride was prepared by boiling a mixture of 5=bromo=2-thiopheneacrylic acid (28 g, 0.12 mole) and thionyl chloride (21 g, 0.18 male) in dry benzene 4100 ml) for -24 h under reflux, and then evaporating at W/O.5 torr, to remove the benzene and the excess of thionyl chloride. The residue was distilled, aud a fraction having b.p. ! 12-f I F/O. 1 torr was collected (26 g, yield 87%) that solidified; m.p. 73-74”. M&yJ 2,3,~,&tetru=~-(2~~~o~~)=~=~~Z~c~~~~~~~~~~e (1). - A solution of methyl b=u-glucopyranoside (3 g, 15 mmoles) in chloroform (100 ml) and anhydrous pyridine (15 g, 0.19 mole) was cooled in ice, and a precooled solution (0”) of 2=furoyl chlori& II2 g, 92 mmoles) in chloroform (20 ml) was added during 30 min, with stirriu&, at such a rate that the temperature did not rise above 0”. After about IS min of stir$g, the &u=glucoside had dissolved; the mixture was kept in the ice-bath and stirred for 2 h at 0”, and for 17 h at 25”. It was then cooled to O”, ice-cold water (lo0 ml) was added, and the chloroform layer was successively washed with ice=cold Mhydrochloric acid, aqueous sodium hydroxide (I .3~), and water, dried (anhydrous magnesium sulfate), and evaporated at 60*/0.5 torr to a thick syrup from which a solid separated on addition of ethanol’.The solid was dissolved in chloroform, ethanol was added and the solution was cooled, whereupon compound 1 crystallized (yield 92%). AfIer two recrystallizations from the same solvent-mixture, it had m.p. 166.5i6S”,id?jiz i- 34.Pic 6.i2, chloroform); v?: 1291(-CC&), ij?j(C<], and i724cm-' (CO); mn.t. data: T 2+44-3.72 (12 H, ring), 4.3C~5.50 (7 H, pyranoside), and 6.46 (3 II, Me). Anal. Calc for C2,H&34: C, 56.84; H, 3.89. Found: C, 56.65; H, 3.71. ~@~h~~2~,4,6=~etru=O=(roy~)~=~-gi~~o~~r~u~~d~(2). - The procedure was
the same as for 1, except that was dissolved in chloroform, cooling the solution, compound from the same solvent-mixture,
methyl z-u-glucopyranoside
was used. Compund
2
and on addition of ethanol, a solid separated. an 2 crystal] ized (yield SI o;b). After two recrystnflizations it had m.p. 167-168.5~. [XI;” +S7.4) (c 6.17. chloroform); vgi 1291 (-OCO-), 1575(C=C), and 1719 cm- r (CO); n.m.r. data. r 2.45-3.74 (12 H, ring), 4.30-5.50 (7 H, pyranoside), and 6.56 (3 I-T, Me). Anal. Calc. for C27HL20r4: C, 56.84; H, 3.59. Found: C’,57.08: H. 3.95. 2,3,4,Ci-r~rra-0-12~~~~~~uc~~~u~~)-B-~-~luca~~ranns~~~ (3). - A solution of methyl P-u-glucopyranoside (2 g, 10 mmole) in chloroform (IO0 ml) and anhydreus pyridine (8.4 g, 1 I mmoies) was cooled in ice, and a prccorkd solution (W) of 2-furanacryloyl chloride (9.6 g, 61 mmolcs) in chloroform (20 ml) was added dropping, Methvi
under anhydrous
conditions, with stirring. during 45 min so that the tempcraturc
not rise above 5”. It was and the chloroform
did
then stirred for I7 h at 5”. kc-cold water ( 150 ml) was added.
layer was successively washed with ice-cold dilute hydrochloric
acid (MM), aqueous potassium carbonate (C).4111), and water, dried (anhydrous potassium
carbonate), and evaporated at StYi0.5 tow to ;I thrck ~:+‘ruythat rv;rs dissolved in petroleum ether (b.p. 40-W). The compound was purified by chromatography on a column of neutral silica gel (actkted
for 2 h at I IO’), and the product was dissolved
in ethyl acetate (100 ml)-petroleum
ether (130 ml;
solution, compound (c 4.39, chloroform): Methyl
b.p. 40-60”:.
3 separated as a solid (yield 25X), YE!: I301 (-OCO-),
On cooling
m.p. KI X!‘,
IX];”
1553, 1632 (C -CL and 1732 cm”’
2,3,4,6- mra - 0-f .?-furanncryloyi)
- CI- r,-gl~~cnp?,rurrfl.~~~~ (4).
(CO). I-.
procedure was the same as for 3, c~ccpt (hat mcthyt r-I)-&rluc(rpyr;lnosiclc vx Compound
4 separated as a solid (~icld lY’%). m.p. SJ- S5 , [x]f,’
chloroform);
tf,f:
1300 (--oco-).
1553. lhrl
of methyl P-r,-gl’iPcopyranr,nidc ( I.9 g, 9.K mm(k)
The us&.
t K1.4’ (c 6.33, i fi'0)
~rrf,~l)-l~-I,-y~~r~np~.ro~ls~lirl~D (5,.
hfrlhyl 2,3,4,6-ferra-0-(.5-h,.rlinrl-3solution
(<‘ C’). nnd 1702cm
the
-t- 59.2”
IU ;~nhydrou\
“I 0 IL pyritlinc
(93 g, I .I8 moles) at 25’ ~ati added 5-hramti---? f’uroyf chltrr*dc ( 11 li p, rr5 iTlIwdC\), and the mixture was stirred
for 24 h. The swqension ~VV:S\ filtered, and 10 the trltratc
was added ice-cold water ( 100 ml); potassium
hydrogen
carbonate
rhc mi~turc
(0.5~).
\qas macic neutral with aqueau*
and then cxtrxted with dichloromethanc.
The extract was dried (anhydrous magncrium sulfate) and c~apornlcd al 60’!8.5 trrrr, to yield a solid which was dissolved
in ethyl acetate t 10 ml) hcranc (IO IT?!), end
purified by column
ah for 3. The product
chromatography
wilt etutcd from
the
column by ethyl acetate (100 ml)-hcxune f 120 sni). ami rhc eluilkz c’b.ir~orarcli rrt 6Q”/(i,5 torr.
Compound
S was obtained
as 3 tan sqlid t~icltl 85%1. mp.
81 Mz’,
[2]i3 -t-32.0” (U 7.59, chloroform); r:fi: 12’)O( -0ct”‘) ), 1575 (I’ I’), 2nd I710 cn\ ’ (CO); n.m.r. data: r 1.77-3.65 (H H, ring), 4.20 5.50 (7 14, ()~;rcrn~$ri*k), irnd 6 46 (3 l-L Me). Anal. Calc. for Cz ,H, ,3r,C3, 4 <‘. 36.00; t1, 1 41s; BF. Ih ta. FClU;ld~ f.“. !fi h”: H, 1.98; Br, 35.93. Mrr/r,vl
2,3,4,&fefTa-0-(
S-bramu-,l-firrrr,rrl )-J-l?-!llnnrp?,fff~~~.~~~~ (6).
I hc
FUROIC
\ND
1-HEXOIC
The solution product \\as column
ESTERS OF D-CLLICOSIDLS
was passed through a column of act~\a:ed aluminum oklde. and clutch! xlth cth>l acr’tate (ISO ml). the cluate ~3s passed through
of sillca gel. and rhe cflluent
solld : 2.9 p. birld (-OCO-).
42”.;).
I53 I (C=Ck
-INI/.
Cnlc.
UZIS cooled.
m p. 6-l-65.. and
[Y]:’
Compound
~-53.2’
1715 cm - ’ (CO):
7.62 ( I2 H. ring Ale). 4.70-5.ES
H.4
65
n.m.r
(7 H. p\ rawside).
for C,,Hj,,O,,S,:
C. S3.N:
9 separated
((3 6.36,
as a white
clllorol’orm):
dala’
the a
vL,p: 1249
r 3Ll-3.6c)
(S H,
ring),
and 6.60 (3 H, 31~). H. 4.3s:
S. lS.57.
Found.
C, 5-l.00:
26: s, IS 53 lf~rl/l~./
prowdurc Compound t61.3’
-7.3.l.4-,crra-O-(s-!r,,~rlr1
\‘.a~ [he wme 10 ~3s
rsolarcd
I ml, hDr 1319 _ (-OCO-).
data.
r 3.35-3.43
ca H, rln_rl, 7.55(1:!
(
l(i).
p-D-plucopyranosldt:
as :I ~:vh~rc w,J~d (2.7 p. y~c!d ?l”.,).
(c 6.16. chloroform):
n.m.r.
/)-/i-D-~~~ucc7/7l.,‘n,ro.~/c/~
l-.I’-~l/wror
as for 9. s~.cepr [hat merh>l I5N
(C=C!.
m.p
and
-
7-I-75’,
[Y]”
’ (CO);
I7 I5 cm-
H, ring hle).-I.-!j-5.70(7
The
~33 used.
H. pyranoside),
and 6.50 (3 H. hle). Jrral. H. 4.36:
CJIC.
for C,,H,,,O,.S,:
C. 33.N:
H. -I._jS: 5.
15.57.
Found:
C, 5_7.70:
S. 15.31.
.~ftdl~ I 2.3, :.4-r~~rlw-O-(s-b~~~~ll~~~-2-rlri~i~~lrL~lliuCt.IIu.I~ J-r-n-!7lrrcop_~'~~7t7~1~7~ie ( II). .A solurlon of merhl I Y-D-glucop) ranoslde ( I g. 5. I mmol?s) In chloroform (90 ml) and anhydrou> p>rldine (20 g. 0.25 molt) was cookd I0 25 . 3 5olurioll (15-I of j-hromo-~-tlllo~hcn~3cr~ loyl chloride IS g_ _ 1’_ mmoles) in ch!oroform 1$;1s added. \\ith stIrring, at _‘S , alid the mixture NBS srlrred okernlght at 75’. and then cooled -
rn
rce
0.
IO
successively
60 10 5 torr
161s
3 SO-l.20
and CC=C).
used.
m.p.
n m.r.
XC’KIK
through ethkl
N;IS
sodium
(IOGmlJ-
3 column
of
acc’[a~c (100 ml).
solid (2.S g. >rcId 5O”b).
bKJUnl5h
chloroform):
$y:
II-L5
~1313. T 2.X-3.15
(-OCO-).
(I’
H.
ring).
and 6.55 i3 I-1. hlc). 12.16. FounG:C,-10.15:
2-fl~/,I/'/r‘~rlr:7cr I IO.1l~-p-D-~7/l/copr
~3s the same as for 11. c\ccpt 12.
ijolsted
as Ibr
11,
nluminum rk
S5-W,
elua~:.
oil&.
compound
[:]A”
(C-C),
and
chain),
-l.50-5.65
[he product
1~3s disiolvcd
1719cm-’
+7I!.3(CO):
lxlnz
I2 srlparared (c 6 81. n.m.r.
(7 H. pgranoslde),
rluted
In erhll
rcpnscd \tith
T
Y:!:
1.X1-3.05
(12).
BCCKI~Z
(-OCO-),
t I7 H. ring).
~3s
180 ml)-
a column I IO0
OT
ml). On
solId (3 I g. ~icld
I l-l5
and L-+5 (5 I-I. hle).
acetale
through
c~hyl
~1s a brwrnish
chloroljrm): darx
raf7osill~
Ihat methyl P-D-~lucop~ranoside
ether ( Iti{) ml. b.p. -l~7-60-). and the solution
ps[roleunl coolrn,o
n
\\lth
C.?C)56:H.?.IS;S.
_‘._~,~.i-I~~rfr7-O-(~-l~l~~?ll:~7-
Compo?lrld
ac(ii:ited
crhjl
~\;ls pa>jcd
(7 H. pyr:lnojrde).
f,rlrC!,H2,,Br10,,,S~
procedure
The
(CO):
li35cm-’
J.-IO-5.%X
a>
(c 6.69.
lalsr
aqueous
sull~~~e)_ and r\aporated iI1
\\a~ elurcd
si-pn~ated
(\I).
S. I2 30.
I~l~lh_l~l -
11
dljjoI!L’d
1 Th e ,oIu[lon
+91.0-
[he chloroform ac~il
ln;lgncsIum
\!;Is
and rhc product [z]A3
nnd
(-I H. charn).
..IIIU/. Calc.
\\hich
and
h>drochlorlc
drred csnh>drolJs syrup
compound
33-9-l’.
\I.35 added.
d~lure
b.p. -KMO
o\dc.
ihe clunir.
SS-S9-
H. 2.59:
(100 ml)
Ice-cold.
3 rhich
aluminum
On cooling 1511.
lo
erller I IO0 Ilil
petroleum actlkated m.p.
\\a[cr ~l[h
( I ?f!). and i\aler
h>dro\lde 3t
Ice-cold \\a;hcd
1511. 3.73~-1.20
Wbj, 1615 (1 H.
J. A. HARRlS, 3. C. ARIIIUR, JR., 0. HUUOJOSA,G. J. BOUDREAUX, E. R. MCCALL
66
AnuL Cktlc.for CJ5H26Br40, &: C, 39.86; H, 2.48; S, 12.16. Found: cl, 40.01;
ET;2ga;,s,m3@ .‘.P i%isryI‘2~;4,~t~~~~yr~~~ soh&m of qne&yl d-r@ucopyranoside
(13). -
TO a
(2 g, 10 tinroles) : in-. anhydrous pyridiae (IoOg, I-2$ moles) was added .&lid 2-&iopheneacry~o$ chtoride (11 g, 64 mmcles), and the .ntixture was stirred for WI&h at 2!Y, and cooled in ice to. 0”. Potassium cc&mate solution (I JM) was added to neutralize the acid, and the mixture was extrncbzd with chloroform. The extract was successively washed with hydrochloric acidfna) and water, dried (anhydrous sodium sulfa+), and evaporated at 60e/0.5 torr to a solibsidue (IO & which was ~~ssolvkdin ethyl ac,etate(100 ml)-petroleum ether (loOmI, .b.p; 4WiO”). The soImion. was p&&d througli a column of activated aluminum oxide, and the product was &ted with ethyl acetate (100 ml). On cuoling the duate, compound 13 separated as a solid (6&g, yield 78%), m.p. Ri-87”, [a]i3 c NW$” (c 7.17, chloroform); v_ KBt1141 (-OCO-), 1505,1616 (0, and 1711cm-’ (CO); n.m.r. da% ~2.10-3.20 (16 H, ring), 3.65-4.10 (4 H, chain), 4.15-5.75 (7 N, pyranoside), and 6.55 (3 H, Me). Ad. Calc.for C3&-Jb1 &: C, 56.89; H, 4.09; S, 17.36. Found: C, 56.84; H, 4.22; s, 17.55. Methyl Z~,d,d-t~tr~~2-ri~phe~eacryloyl)-8(14). - The procedure wm t&e same as for 13, except that methyl #I-u-glueopyranoside was used, Cumpcund 14was isolated as a solid (6.0 g, yield 78%), m-p. 82-83’, [a];” +74-l”
(c 6.64, chloroform); v,,,, RBr1143 (-OC0-), 1510, 1620 (C=C), and 1719 cm”. (CO): n.m.r. data: ~2.05-3.15 (I6 H, ring), 3.644.05 (4 H, chain), 4.45-5,65 (7 H, pyranoside), and 6.45 (3 H, Me). Armi. Calc, for CJsH~OO,oS~: C, 56.89; H, 4.09; S, 17.36. Found: C, 57.07; H, 4.18; S, 17.56.
1 2 3 4 5
0. II. I. J.
Q. u F. A. BLOUZN,AND J. C. ARTHUR, JR., Rudiut. Res., 23 (1964) 527-536. M. SARRARiwr~ J. C. AR~IJR, JR+,Chem. Id (London), (1967) 2085-2087. M. SARIWEANDJ. C. ARTHUR,JR, Carbuhrydr. Rex.. 6 (1968) 207-213. M. Smm&J, C. ARTEWR,JR., AND 0, Hnaom~, Cmbohydr. Res., 6 (1968) 333-340. C Amm, h., D. J. ~~I-‘ANONIS, T. Maa, AND 0. HINCWSA,J. Appi. P&m. Scf., 1I (1967)
6 S. SXNGFI mn 1. C. ARTHWR, JR., Carbohyck. Rs., 14 (1970) 73-82. 7 S SIGH ANDJ. C. ARTIIVR,JR, Ckboky&. Res., 17 (1971) 353-363. 8 J. C. ARTBIIR,JR., F. A. Boom, AND R. 3. DIEMINT, W. S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Sew. Rep., 72-21, (1960) 7 pp. 9 It. El. Sazmm~ AND A. 0. Aum, .F. Chem P&s., 24 (1956) 56-59.