The reaction of benzophenone triplets with norbornadiene and quadricyclene

The reaction of benzophenone triplets with norbornadiene and quadricyclene

Tetrahedron Letter8 No. 52, PP 5345 - 5348, THE REACTION OF BENZOPHENONE NORBORNADIENE A.A. AND in UK 23 October in Great Britain. TRIPLETS W...

176KB Sizes 7 Downloads 91 Views

Tetrahedron

Letter8

No. 52, PP 5345 - 5348,

THE REACTION

OF BENZOPHENONE

NORBORNADIENE A.A.

AND

in UK 23 October

in Great Britain.

TRIPLETS WITH

QUADRICYCLENE

Garman and R. L. Leyland

Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, (Received

Printed

Pergamon Frese.

1972.

1972;

accepted

for

Manchester Ml3

publication

9PL.

30 November 1972)

One of the best documented reactions of organic photochemistry involves the conversion of a norbornadiene to the corresponding quadricyclene

system.

’ Sensitisatian of the reaction is Possible and

Hammond has shown that with aromatic ketone and aldehyde triplet sensitisers a photostationary state between norbarnadiene (1) and quadricyclene the dcnor.*r3

(2) is established, the position of which depends an the triplet energy of

This was interpreted in terms of a non-spectroscopic excitation

triplet of 1 ar a biradical

2;

of 2 to either the Fran&Candan

the different internal energies of r and 2 thus accounted for the importance of the

donor triplet energy on the position of the photostationary state. 1) Kubota,

Shima and Sakurai4 have recently

rep&ted that the 1: 1 adducts of benzophenone and ncrbornadiene -4,5 and 6 are farmed in 32%, yields respectively.

15% and 3%

These workers proposed that the adducts are formed via the intermediacy of interconverting

biradicais of types --7,8 and -9 which are formed by attack of benzaphenone triplet an ground state narbarnadiene. An interest in the mechanism of energy transfer in ketone sensitised reactions5 had led us to investigate the reaction of the norbarnadiene/quadricyclene

system with benzophenone.

The work by the Japanese graup

prampts us to describe cur own results which show that the adducts are -not farmed by addition of benzaphenane triplet to norbarnadiene. Deoxygenated benzene solutions containing norbornadiene (0.82M)

and benzaphenone (0.014M)

were

irradiated in Pyrex with a 1ooW medium pressure mercury arc and the reaction monitored by g. I. c. and t. I. c. After 28 minutes the formation of quadricyclene

1)Substantial

(2) and two unknown products could be detected and after 18

amounts of the starting material were consumed in side reactions.3

534.5

5546

No.

hours all the benzophenone on alumina, A similar

were isolated

reaction

essentially

in 61% and 26% yields

with quadricyclene

the same isolated

were also obtained Clearly

The two unknowns,

had been cansumed.

yields,

(0.02M)

and identified

using ether Q isapentone

respectively.

as solvent

(0.014M)

2)

quadricyclene

the reactions

ond not to norbamadiene

in neat norbarnadiene

were irradiated

The changes in concentration

approximately

100 minutes,

‘Our

assignments

7,8 --

were not as clean.

on norbornadiene

Evidence as follows:

on a conventional

and the quadricyclene

are in cunplete

that in fact benzaphenone degassed O.OllM

*merry-go-round’

and quadricyclene

decay of benzaphenone

and/or

9

and 2.

was obtained

of benzophenme

no deaoy of benzophenone

sttubwal

triplet

and mass spectra)

8

leading to the set of biradicals

to quodricyclene

in benzene gave only 4 and 2 in

The same praducts (nmr.

_4 and _S are the products of exo attack of benzophenone

7

initially

although

separated by dry column chramatagraphy

as the axetans 4 and the ether 2 respectively.

and benzophenane

55% and 26%

52

with

production

solutions

apparatus

order.

and a decrease in the rate of quadricyclene

agreement with

those of Kubota

et al.4

adds only

of benzaphenone

in sealed pyrex tubes.

time are shown in Fig. was pseudo-zero

triplet

1.

3)

There was

After farmation

We did not isolate

the

minor odduct 6. 3) n-Nonone standards.

and P-naphthaldehyde,

added befare and after

irradiation

respectively,

were employed as g. 1. C.

No.

5347

52

became

apparedThis

Therefwe,

indicates that the loss of benzophenone as adduct daes not involve ncrbcrandiene.

since the biradical adducts -7,8 and 2, which experiment shows are derived from quackicyclene, lead

to adducts, they cannot be formed from norbamadiene.

rlj x lo3 ml

-1

0 Fig.

1.

50

100

150

t (mins)

Change in concentration with time of benzophenone (2~ curve 1) and quadricyclene (Q; curve 2) on irradiation of -one (0.6il M) in neat narbornadiene.

Thus, we ccnclude that a) the benzcphenane sensitised conversion of 1 to 2 involves collisianal transfer a complex formation which does -not lead to biradicol and b) -one least in part, to farm a Schenck-like

bfradical,

perhaps via complex fcrmatian.

energy

triplet reacts with 2, at This is to our knowledge the

first example of attack af a ketane triplet on a strained saturated hydroaarbon. A possible alternative mechanism for the process resulting in the conversion of qwdricyclene nabomadlene via aanatic

to

ketone ond aldehyde sensitisation would appear to be one involving the

fragmentation of intermediate adduct birodiwls

of type?.

Further work concerning this possibility

is in

progress.

We thank the Science Research Council fa financial support.

‘)The experiment was repeated using a different agparatus and 313 nm light. The decay of benzcphenme c~mnenced much later (100 hours) but at the same quadricyclene ccncentraticn (1.8 x 10m2M).

No. 52

5348 References

Dauben and 1. (a) S. J. Cristol and R. L. Snell, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 1958, gj, 1950; (b) W.G. R.L. Cargill, Tetrahedron, 1961, 15, 197; (c) J.R. Edman and H.E. Simmons, J. 0 7; Chem.,.196B, 33, 3808; (d) P.R. Starey and S.R. FaEenholr, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 1964,%, 527; a H.G. Rrchey and N.C. Budcley, ibid., 1963, as, 3057; (t) P.G. Gassmann, D.S. Patton and D.H. Aue, ib&, 1964, 86, 4211; (g) P.G.xumann, D.H. Aue, andD.S. Patton, ibid., 1968, 90, 7271; (h) A.A. Gorman and J.B. Sheridan, Tetrahedron Letters, 1969, 2569; (i) H. P%&ch and J. Rivier, Helv. Chem. Acta, 1970, 53, 2201; (i) H. Prinzbach, J. Rivier and G. Englert, ibid., 1970, 53, 2219; (k) G. Kaupp and H. Prinzbach, Annalen, 1969, 725, 52. 2.

G.S.

Hmnmond, N.J.

Two,

and A. Fischer, J. Amer. Chem. Sot.,

3.

G.S.

Hammond, P. Wyatt,

4.

T. Kubota, K. Shima, and H. Sdwai,

C.D.

DeBoer, and N.J.

1961, 83, 4674.

Turro, J. Amer. Chem. Sot.,

1964, 86, 2532.

Chemistry Letters, 1972, 343.

5. N.C. Yang, J.I. Cohen and A. Shani, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 1968, 90, 3264. J. Saltiel, K.R. Neuberger and M. Wrighton, ib&, 1969, E, 3658. N. J. Two and P.A. Wriede, 5, 1970, 92, 320; I.E. Kochevar and P. J. Wagner, ibid., 1972,E, 3859.