The tensile strength of an Fe and a NiFe base amorphous alloy

The tensile strength of an Fe and a NiFe base amorphous alloy

Scripta METALLURGICA Vol. 7, pp. 1161-1164, 1973 Printed in the United States Pergamon Press, Inc. THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF AN Fe AND A Ni-Fe BASE ...

126KB Sizes 0 Downloads 46 Views

Scripta METALLURGICA

Vol. 7, pp. 1161-1164, 1973 Printed in the United States

Pergamon Press,

Inc.

THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF AN Fe AND A Ni-Fe BASE AMORPHOUS ALLOY D. E. Polk and C. A. Pampillo Materials Research Center Allied Chemical Corporation Morristown, New Jersey 07960

{Received August 30, 1973) This note reports data on the mechanical properties of a Ni-Fe and an Fe base metallic glass, namely Ni49Fe29PI4B6AI2 and Fe76PI6C4Si2AI 2. A more detailed report on the strength and fracture characteristics of these amorphous solids will follow

(i).

Strips 0.i cm wide by 0.0025 cm thick were produced by a modified PondMaddin technique

(2).

They were analyzed by x-ray diffraction and transmission

electron microscopy and found to be amorphous.

Pieces 6 cm long were cut out

of the strips and polished down to a width of about 0.04 cm. were pulled in a table model Instron machine at a cross-head

The specimens speed of ~0.3 cm/

min., using a set of specially designed tensile grips that avoid stress concentrations at the jaws. Figs.

1 and 2 show the tensile strength as a function of temperature for

the Fe base and Ni-Fe base glasses respectively.

The data shown at each tem-

perature gives the mean value obtained for five specimens and the errors quoted are the averages of the absolute values of the deviations

from the mean.

The graphs also show the apparent Young's modulus as a function of temperature as obtained from the load elongation curve after correction for the compliance of the tensile machine.

Because this technique is not precise,

these values should be taken as approximate

(they are probably about 20 to 30%

below the real values). It is apparent from Figs.

1 and 2 that the behaviors of the two glasses

at low temperatures are quite different.

The tensile strength of the Ni-Fe

base glass increases monotomically with decreasing of ~375,000 psi at 76°K. at low temperatures.

In contrast,

temperature up to a value

the pure Fe base glass becomes brittle

This begins at ~200°K where the tensile strength that

has reached 365,000 psi, starts to decrease

slowly with decreasing

The decrease in strength becomes catastrophic below 125°K.

temperature.

The temperature

dependence of the tensile strength of the Ni-Fe base glass below about room temperature and the Fe base glass from about room temperature down to 200°K is 1161

1162

TENSILE

STRENGTH

OF Fe A N D Ni-Fe

BASE A M O R P H O U S

ALLOY

Vol.

7, No.l]

I Fe76 PI6 C4 Si E AlE

/ / /

200;

~

~

~

I -° L~

APPARENT

I I00

I 200

~_

~ YOUNGS MODULUS

I 300 TEMPERATURE,

FIG.

400 -

[ 400 °K

1

Ni49

F e 2 9 P I 4 BE A12

_ 300

~A P P A . E ~

200

% ~0

L }

I

I 2 O0

IO 0

I 300 TEMPERATURE,

FIG.

much greater

than

that found

Pd.775Cu.06Si.165 different atomic

interactions

Several

other

all t e m p e r a t u r e s , were

always

This m e a n s across

(3) and

temperature

features

were

the n o r m a l s

strength

are m o s t

flow stress

of P d . 8 0 S i . 2 0

likely r e l a t e d

found

to the

has o c c u r r e d

This

fracture

about room

to be d i f f e r e n t

to the f r a c t u r e

45 ° r e l a t i v e

that f r a c t u r e

the thickness. above

0.2% c o m p r e s s i v e

the tensile

coefficients

OK

2

of

below

0°C.

The

to the d i f f e r e n t

in each of the glasses.

inclined

temperatures

for the

I 400

surfaces

tensile

axis

along planes mode

temperature.

is found Below

for the two glasses. of the N i - F e

and the thickness

of m a x i m u m

shear

in the F e - b a s e this

temperature

At

base glass vector.

stress

glass

only at

fracture

Vol.

7, No.

ii

TENSILE S T R E N G T H OF Fe AND Ni-Fe BASE A M O R P H O U S ALLOY

1163

surfaces were normal to the tensile axis.

This suggests a rather more b r i t t l e

b e h a v i o r b e l o w r o o m temperature.

this glass remains strong down to

However,

about 125°K. The t o p o g r a p h y of the fracture surfaces on the N i - F e and Fe b a s e glasses, to be r e p o r t e d m o r e e x t e n s i v e l y these findings.

Changes

in a f o r t h c o m i n g paper

(i), is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h

in the m i c r o s c o p i c mode of failure are found at around

room t e m p e r a t u r e and b e l o w about 200°K for the Fe base glass.

For the Ni-Fe

base glass only one m i c r o s c o p i c mode of failure is present at all temperatures. This mode is similar to that r e p o r t e d for Pd-Si glasses by Leamy et al. further d i s c u s s e d by P a m p i l l o and R e i m s c h u e s s e l

(5) and

(6).

The data shown c l e a r l y indicates that an e m b r i t t l i n g effect occurs at low temperatures

in the Fe base glass and t h a t this p h e n o m e n a is not p r e s e n t in the

Ni-Fe base glass down to 76°K.

W h e t h e r the e f f e c t is a ductile to b r i t t l e

t r a n s i t i o n similar to that o b s e r v e d

in Fe and some of its alloys, or an envi-

r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t is not clear as yet.

In the former case Ni w o u l d appear to

play the same t o u g h e n i n g role as in c r y s t a l l i n e alloys; act to p r e v e n t the e n v i r o n m e n t a l effect at the surface.

in the latter Ni may The fact that the

fracture t o p o g r a p h y and hence the m i c r o s c o p i c mode of fracture changes at the transition

s u g g e s t s a ductile to brittle t r a n s i t i o n rather than an environ-

mental effect.

References C. A. P a m p i l l o and D. E. Polk, R. Pond,

Jr. and R. Maddin,

to be published.

Trans. A I M E 245, 2475

C. A. P a m p i l l o and H. S. Chen,

to appear in Mat.

T. M a s u m o t o and R. Maddin, Acta Met. H. J. Leamy,

19, 725

(1969). Sc. and Eng.

(1971).

H. S. C h e n and T. T. Wang, Met. Trans.

C. A. P a m p i l l o and A. C. Reimschuessel,

3, 699

(1972).

to be published.

Acknowledgement Thanks are due to R. A. Costa and A. F. P r e z i o s i for their help w i t h the experiments.

Thanks are also due to Dr. J. J. Gilman for his e n c o u r a g e m e n t

and for r e v i e w i n g the manuscript.