Accepted Manuscript The value of cool roof as a strategy to mitigate urban heat island effect: A contingent valuation approach
Li Zhang, Hiroatsu Fukuda, Zhonghui Liu PII:
S0959-6526(19)31435-0
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.338
Reference:
JCLP 16694
To appear in:
Journal of Cleaner Production
Received Date:
06 March 2019
Accepted Date:
25 April 2019
Please cite this article as: Li Zhang, Hiroatsu Fukuda, Zhonghui Liu, The value of cool roof as a strategy to mitigate urban heat island effect: A contingent valuation approach, Journal of Cleaner Production (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.338
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Character Count: 6313
2
The value of cool roof as a strategy to mitigate urban heat
3
island effect: A contingent valuation approach
4
Li Zhang 1, Hiroatsu Fukuda 2*, and Zhonghui Liu 3
5
1
6 7
Japan,
[email protected] 2
8 9 10
Department of Architecture, the University of Kitakyushu, Hibikino, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Department of Architecture, the University of Kitakyushu, Hibikino, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan,
[email protected]
3
Department of Architecture, the University of Kitakyushu, Hibikino, Wakamatsu-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan,
[email protected]
11 12
* Correspondence:
[email protected]; Tel: +91-090-1369-8821
13
Abstract:
14
The urban heat island effect in Beijing is significant, which has become a serious environmental problem posed to Beijing
15
citizens. As an important measure to alleviate the urban heat island effect, cool roof is recommended in relevant Evaluation
16
Standard for Green Building of China. In order to elicit policy implications, this paper investigates Beijing residents'
17
willingness to pay for promoting cold roofs to alleviate the urban heat island effect and its determinants. This research
18
applied double-bounded discrete choice format and face to face interview to elicit public’s willingness to pay. 841 Beijing
19
households were randomly selected and interviewed. For 242 (29%) respondents refuse to pay, the spike model was
20
introduced to process the data for it has been proved to outperform the conventional model in dealing with zero responses.
21
The average annual willingness to pay was computed as 1510.854 Chinese Yuan, which is 220.562 US dollars per household.
22
In addition, In terms of the determinants of residents’ willingness to pay, other than conventional demographic
23
characteristics, we added and estimated covariance with regard to environmental knowledge and the theory of planned
24
behavior. The result indicated that social norm, perceived behavior control, and previous knowledge of urban heat island
25
effect and cool roof are statistical significantly related with residents’ willingness to pay. This research suggests that timely
26
information disclosure with regard to urban environment management and pro-environment education are urgently needed
27
in promoting public participation in alleviating the urban heat island effect.
28
Keywords: urban heat island; public participation; contingent valuation; cool roof; willingness to pay
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 29
1. Introduction
30
The increasing urban population has imposed a heavy burden on the urban environment and climate. According to
31
United Nations world population prospect, over half of the world's population currently lives in cities, while 2.5 billion
32
more people are projected to move to cities by 2025 (United Nations, 2017). In China, the urban population has tripled from
33
1978 to 2010. With the expansion of the city, the urban climate and its impact on human health is becoming increasingly
34
important. During the urban expansion, the original natural vegetation was replaced by artificial impermeable materials,
35
such as conventional asphalt and concrete, which affects the thermal environment of the urban surface and changes the heat
36
and moisture exchange between the surface and the atmosphere, and forms special meteorological phenomenon. Urban heat
37
island (UHI) effect, which is, the significant difference of temperature between urban and suburban area (Santamouri et al.,
38
2013). This phenomenon reduces the thermal comfort of urban residents significantly, increases energy consumption in
39
summer and worsens air quality (Stafoggia et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2018).
40
Beijing city has been developed rapidly during the past decades and the UHI effect is significant. A long-term measured
41
weather dataset from 1961 to 2014 by Cui et al. (2017) has indicated that the UHI effect in Beijing is significant, with an
42
urban-to-rural temperature difference of up to 8°C during the winter nighttime, Ge et al. (2016) reported the UHI intensity
43
of Beijing fluctuated from 5.37 ℃ to 9.27 ℃ from 1991 to 2011. UHI effect has been one of the main environmental problem
44
posed to Beijing citizens.
45
Replacing conventional roofs with high albedo materials to reduce the absorption of solar radiation has become an
46
important mean to alleviate the UHI effect (Santamouris, 2014). Cool roof is defined as the roof with high solar reflectance
47
(ability to reflect sunlight, spectrum 0.3–2.5 μm) and high thermal emittance (ability to emit thermal radiation, spectrum 4–
48
80 μm) (Gao et al., 2014). The effectiveness of this approach has been tested in situ and simulated with different urban
49
scales in China.
50
Jiang (2012) indicated that if the roof solar reflectance was increased from 0.18 to 0.82, the surface temperature of a
51
dormitory in Guangzhou province can be reduce by 10-15K in summer afternoon. Study on a natural ventilated factory in
52
southern China in the summer of 2011 indicated that white coating can reduce the outer surface temperature by as much as
53
17 degrees (Gao et al., 2014). An experimental research of Yang (2014) in Beijing indicated that cool roof can reduce
54
building roof surface temperature by as much as 17 degrees by increasing solar reflectance form 0.20 to 0.80.
55
As one important UHI effect mitigation method, cool roofs are also encouraged in relevant building energy efficiency
56
standards (China, 2006). In 2010, China's Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) and the US
57
Department of Energy (DOE) formed a cool roof working group, aiming at evaluating the potential value of applying cool
58
roofs in China. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA, together with Chongqing University of China and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 59
Guangdong Academy of Building Research, China, conducts general research on the science and policies of cool roof within
60
the US-China Clean Energy Research Center Building Energy Efficiency Consortium.
61
The role of government and the public sector in promoting new techniques in dealing with UHI effect has been found
62
in numerous studies (Gao et al., 2014; Synnefa and Santamouris, 2012), while the policy makers needs information
63
associated with the value of cool roof mitigating UHI effect. The benefit of UHI mitigation, which is a non-traded product,
64
has no market price. Due to the difficulty of measuring the economic value of the benefits of the UHI effect mitigation,
65
evaluating the willingness to pay (WTP) has become a common measurement of its economic value (Laitila, 2004). WTP
66
refers to the maximum amount a consumer will pay for a specific utility, or to avoid undesirable things. In our research, it
67
refers to the effect of cool roof in UHI effect mitigation. Moreover, supporting public participation is considered as essential
68
part of sustainable development strategy of China (China, 1994). However, due to China’s governance structure, individual
69
participation in urban environmental issues is relatively rare. The study of Huang (2015) have shown that the urban
70
environment deterioration is widely concerned by the public, which may become an important opportunity to promote
71
public participation in urban environmental governance. In addition, There has been increasingly concerned about the
72
factors affecting individual pro-environmental behavior among the world's environmental policy makers, which could
73
contribute to a more effective environmental policies (Simões, 2016). Therefore, the acceptance of residents in promoting
74
cool roof for mitigating the UHI effect, especially the WTP, should be fully concerned.
75
In a hypothetical market, WTP can be elicited with contingent valuation method (CVM) (Mitchell, 1989). CVM is part
76
of a wider family of statement preference method, which is a survey based economic valuation method. The contingent
77
valuation method is based on respondents’ responses instead of observable market behavior, it refers to direct questioning
78
of people to elicit the WTP. The CVM is able to obtain the total economic value of a specific public good which has no
79
market value, and it is considered to be the only method available for the assessment of non-use value of a specific
80
environmental goods and services (Venkatachalam, 2004). Nowadays, it has been widely applied in fields like
81
environmental resource management, cultural goods evaluation, health risk reduction, public policy as well as many other
82
fields (Baranzini et al., 2010; Longo, 2012; Santagata and Signorello, 2000; Spash et al., 2009).
83
A considerable numbers of researchers have investigated the public WTP for mitigating UHI effect or urban heat
84
waves. Zhang et al. (2016) used the CVM to find the WTP for the protective measures of heat waves provided by the market
85
and the government. The result indicated that the annual WTP accounts for 40 Chinese yuan (CNY). In addition, they also
86
reported that the WTP is correlated with the factors of gender, income, district, heat wave experience, chronic non-
87
communicable disease, and air conditioner ownership. Kim et al. (2016) applied the choice experiment to assess the WTP
88
for mitigating UHI effect with urban forest. The derived WTP are 56.88-76.59 US dollars for every increase of the urban
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 89
forest by 1m2. Ihara et al. (2011) evaluated the WTP to avoid heat disorders caused by UHI effect. Morawetz and Koemle
90
(2017) applied CVM method to estimate the WTP for trees and fountains as measures against UHI effect in Vienna, Austria,
91
with limitation of the research method discussed. To the best of our knowledge, in this strand of research no studies have
92
explored the social acceptance and WTP for the main technologies for UHI effect mitigation along with its determinants.
93
In this study, we assessed Beijing household’s willingness to pay for the promotion of cool roof to mitigating the UHI
94
effect. In comparison with previous studies, there are two elements that differentiate this research with the others. The first
95
point is that we combined the double-bounded discrete choice (DBDC) format with spike model to process zero-response
96
samples, which has been proved to outperform the conventional model in processing zero-response samples (Kristrom,
97
1997). The second is that we extended the determinants of WTP. In addition to conventional social-economic factors, we
98
added and estimated covariates associated with environmental knowledge and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) (Ajzen,
99
1991; Vicente-Molina et al., 2013), which may provide new evidence for unstanding individual’s pro-environment behavior.
100
The rest of this research is organized as follows: In Section two, the study methodology is presented. A model of WTP
101
estimation with spike model is described in section three. Section four reported and result along with its discussion. Section
102
five summarizes the main conclusion and provides policy implications.
103
2. Research method
104
2.1. Method of Assessing the WTP
105
CVM has been widely used to evaluating non-market value (Mitchell, 1989). There are no limitation on the objects to
106
be assessed. CVM is superior to other non-market evaluation method for it can capture the non-use value or existence value.
107
The environment goods of our research is the effect of cool roof in alleviating the UHI effect, as explained before.
108
Direct questioning is the main feature of CVM, while it is also the source of its possible bias. Some scholars has
109
questioned about the practicality and reliability of CVM. Regarding this, the blue ribbon National Oceanic and Atmospheric
110
Administration (NOAA) points out that related bias can be eliminated by technical means, and CVM could provide reliable
111
quantitative evaluation results. NOAA has proposed several guidelines to ensure the reliability of relevant CVM research
112
(Arrow, 1993).
113
2.2. The Design of Survey
114 115
The CVM field survey was conducted from July 10th -August 5th of 2018. A total of 1050 Beijing households was interviewed and the final valid responses was 841, the response rate was 80%.
116
A CVM survey can be conducted through face-to-face interview, mail survey, telephone interview, and online research.
117
The limitation of mail survey is that the response rate is low, which may lead to representative bias. The telephone interview
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 118
can provide only limited information to respondents. The reliability of online survey is still controversial. This research
119
applied face to face interview, which is also recommended by the NOAA guidelines (Arrow, 1993).
120
A total of 10 interviewers were involved and were divided into five groups, each group was consisted of one interview
121
and one supervisor (Franceschi and F. Vásquez, 2011). Before the onsite interview, each interviewer has received some
122
training, including how to explain the purpose of the experiment, the related rights of respondents, and how to answer
123
possible questions that respondents might ask. We selected 39 residential blocks of Beijing randomly. In each block 20-30
124
households were chosen. To derive reliable decision making, only 18-70 years old respondents were selected as decision
125
maker of each household and interviewed in this survey.
126
The survey instrument consists of five parts. The first part was the introduction section, explaining the general
127
background information, including the definition of UHI effect, the current situation of UHI effect in Beijing, the hazard of
128
UHI effect, and the effect of cool roof in alleviating the UHI effect. The rights of each respondent was introduced before
129
the interview. The second part contained the information of individual’s motivation and behavior. The third part contained
130
questions relating to the respondents’ previous knowledge (previous knowledge of UHI effect and cool roof). The fourth
131
and fifth part comprised the socio-economic characteristic and demographic characteristic, respectively (Fig.1). The WTP
132
question is: If Beijing government is going to replace 10% of building roof of Beijing into cool roof (approximately 20
133
million m2) , is your household willing to pay a certain amount by increasing the personal income tax for the next 7 years?
134
Then, the SPSS 24 and R version 3.5.3 were applied to conduct descriptive analysis and estimate the determinants for WTP.
135
At last, policy implications was proposed.
136 137
Fig. 1. Questionnaire and measurement items.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 138
2.3. WTP Elicitation technique
139
Four WTP elicitation techniques are currently in use:
140
1. Bidding format: The questioner proposes WTP value and keeps making higher or lower bids until the maximum
141
amount the respondent is willing to pay is identified.
142
2. Payment card format: Respondents selected the most acceptable options from a number of predetermined prices
143
3. Open-ended format: Respondents report the maximum WTP directly.
144
4. Dichotomous choice format (DC): Respondents were asked about whether to accept or reject a randomly assigned
145
bid.
146
The DC format was chosen to obtain WTP. The NOAA blue-ribbon panel’s report also recommend this elicitation
147
technique (Arrow, 1993). In previous researches, the single-bounded dichotomous choice (SBDC) and double-bounded
148
dichotomous choice (DBDC) is mostly used. SBDC is a one-time DC question while DBDC contains two questions (Soon
149
and Ahmad, 2015).
150
Four bid combinations were set, which is (100/200/400) (400/800/1500) (800/1500/3000) (1500/3000/5000) CHY.
151
The middle figure is the initial bid, the first element is the lower bid while the third element is the higher bid. If the initial
152
bid was rejected by the respondent, the lower bid will be presented, or otherwise, the higher bid will be presented. US dollar
153
(USD) 1.0 was approximately equal to CHY 6.68 with the current exchange rate.
154
2.4. Payment Vehicle
155
Respondents may feel confused when asked directly about WTP, and a payment medium can help reveal the true
156
payment intention. This payment medium is usually referred to as payment vehicle. In previous CVM studies, the most
157
commonly used payment vehicle includes taxes, funds, donation, ticket fee, etc. According to Carson et al. (2001), a
158
payment vehicle with mandatory feature can effectively reduce the action of free-riding and over-pledging of respondents.
159
In addition, respondents should be familiar with the payment vehicle. Therefore, we choose tax as the payment vehicle of
160
this research. Compare with other types taxation, Beijing citizens are more familiar with personal income tax. The
161
acceptance of payment vehicle was tested before the main survey.
162
At last, payment frequency and payment duration should be decided. According to Egan et al. (2015), we chose annual
163
fee as the payment frequency. The payment duration of this research is 7 years, which is the minimum expected duration of
164
benefits from a cool roof.
165
2.5. Determinants of WTP
166
Over the past few decades, individual responsibility for environmental protection and personal pro-environment
167
behavior have received more and more attention (Simões, 2016). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a theory that
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 168
links one’s belief, perceived resources, and behavior. According to the original TPB model, the most proximal predictors
169
of behavior are behavioral intentions, and these intentions are partially influenced by the following: (a) attitudes: an
170
individual’s positive or negative appraisal towards the behavior option; (b) The subjective norms: an individual's perception
171
of particular behavior, which is influenced by pressure of related social groups (e.g., family members, classmates, friends);
172
and (c) perceived behavioral control: an individual's perceived resources, time, money in performing the specific behavior
173
(Ajzen, 1991). The TPB assumes that attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms can help us better
174
understand and predict individual’s pro-environment behavior, in our case, the behavior of paying for UHI effect mitigation.
175
Environmental knowledge is defined as “knowledge and awareness about environmental problem and possible solutions
176
to those problems”(Zsóka et al., 2013). Numbers of studies have shown that people with rich environmental knowledge are
177
more inclined to take environmental behavior, and a lack of environmental knowledge will limit people's pro-environmental
178
behavior (Kaiser and Fuhrer, 2003; Mobley et al., 2010; Oğuz et al., 2010). The study of Kennedy et al. (2009) indicates
179
that 60% of respondents felt that their environmental behaviors often limited by lack of relevant knowledge.
180
In this research, other than conventional covariance used in previous studies (age, gender, income, et al.) determinants
181
with regard to TPB theory and environmental knowledge were added.
182
3. DBDC plus spike model
183
3.1. The conventional DBDC-CVM model
184
In DBDC survey, if the respondents rejected the initial bid, he/she would then be presented with a lower bid, or
185
otherwise, be presented with a higher bid. Possible responses includes “yes-no”, “yes-yes,” “no-no”, and “no-yes”. The
186
𝑌𝑌 𝑁𝑁 𝑁𝑌 binary-valued indicator variables were 𝐼𝑌𝑁 𝑖 ,𝐼𝑖 ,𝐼𝑖 ,𝐼𝑖 , respectively.
187
𝐼𝑌𝑁 𝑖 (ith respondent’s answer was ‘yes-no’)
188
𝐼𝑌𝑌 𝑖 (ith respondent’s answer was ‘yes-yes’)
189
𝐼𝑁𝑁 𝑖 (ith respondent’s answer was ‘no-no’)
190
𝐼𝑁𝑌 𝑖 (ith respondent’s answer was ‘no-yes’)
191
𝐺𝐶(𝐴 ;γ) is a cumulative distribution function (cdf) that refers to WTP. γ is the parameter to be estimated and A is
192
the value of bid. 𝐴𝑖 refers to the initial bids, while 𝐴𝑢𝑖 (𝐴𝑖 < 𝐴𝑢𝑖) is the higher bid presented after the initial bid and 𝐴𝑑𝑖 is
193
the lower bid presented after the initial bid. The log-likelihood function is as follows: 𝑁
194
ln 𝐿 =
∑ {𝐼
𝑌𝑌 𝑖 ln
𝑢 𝑁𝑌 𝑑 𝑁𝑁 𝑑 [1 ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑢𝑖;γ)] + 𝐼𝑌𝑁 𝑖 ln [𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖 ;γ) ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖;γ)] + 𝐼𝑖 ln [𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖;γ) ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖 ;γ)] + 𝐼𝑖 ln 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖 ;γ)}
𝑖=1
195
Formulating 1 ― 𝐺𝐶( .) as logistic cdf and combining this with γ = (a,b) yields:
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖;γ) = [1 + exp (𝑎 ― 𝑏𝐴)] ―1
196 197 198
𝐶 + is the mean WTP, where C can be both positive or negative. The mean WTP is 𝐶 + = 𝑎/𝑏. 3.2. Spike model
199
Zero responses often appear in CVM studies (in our case it is 29% of respondents), ignoring which may raise zero
200
responses bias. The spike-model provides one approach to mitigate this possible bias without compromising the analysis.
201
It was originally proposed for SBDC-CVM data by (Kristrom, 1997), which takes into account a spike at zero that is the
202
truncation, at zero, of the negative part of the WTP distribution. Then it was adjusted for DBDC-CVM data by Yoo and
203
Kwak (2002), which indicates that the overall results of the spike model outperforms the conventional DBDC-CVM model
204
significantly. In recent years, the spike model has been applied in CVM researches with regard to energy policy making,
205
historical land conservation, and urban sustainable development (Kim et al., 2017; Kwon et al., 2018; Lim and Yoo, 2014).
206
The respondents with “no-no” response were asked with a following-up question to distinguish positive WTP samples
207
𝑁𝑁𝑌 from real zero samples. For each respondent i, 𝐼𝑁𝑁 and 𝐼𝑁𝑁𝑁 , as follows: 𝑖 can be classified into 𝐼𝑖 𝑖
208
𝐼𝑁𝑁𝑌 = 1(ith respondent’s answer was “no-no-yes”) 𝑖
209
𝐼𝑁𝑁𝑁 = 1(ith respondent’s answer was “no-no-no”) 𝑖
210
The log-likelihood function for the spike model takes the form: 𝑁
211
ln 𝐿 =
∑ {𝐼
𝑌𝑌 𝑖 ln
𝑢 𝑁𝑌 𝑑 𝑁𝑁𝑌 [1 ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑢𝑖;γ)] + 𝐼𝑌𝑁 [ln 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑑𝑖;γ) ― 𝐺𝐶(0 ;γ)] + 𝑖 ln [𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖 ;γ) ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖;γ)] + 𝐼𝑖 ln [𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖;γ) ― 𝐺𝐶(𝐴𝑖 ;γ)] + 𝐼𝑖
𝑖=1
212
In which
{
[1 + exp (𝑎 ― 𝑏𝐴)] ―1 𝐺𝐶(𝐴 ;θ) = [1 + exp (𝑎)] ―1 0
213 214
𝑖𝑓𝐴 > 0 𝑖𝑓𝐴 = 0 𝑖𝑓𝐴 < 0
The spike is defined by [1 + 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑎)] ―1 . The average mean WTP can be computed as 𝐶 + = (1/𝑏)ln [1 + exp (𝑎)].
215
4. Results
216
4.1. Data
217
Table 1 explains the distribution responses for each bid combinations. A total of 242 respondents gave “NNN” responses,
218
suggesting that it is suitable for applying the spike model to deal with the zero response samples in this study. The proportion
219
of “Yes” response to the initial bid declines as the magnitude of the bid increases. A total of 132 (62%) respondents were
220
willing to pay 200 CHY, while 85 (41%) respondents were willing to pay 3000 CHY.
221
Table 1. Distribution of Responses
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Bid combination
YY
YN
NY
NNY
NNN
SUM
400/200/100
72(34%)
60(28%)
10(5%)
18(8%)
51(24%)
211(100%)
1500/800/400
39(19%)
50(24%)
15(7%)
35(17%)
71(34%)
210(100%)
3000/1500/800
32(15%)
54(26%)
19(9%)
36(17%)
69(33%)
210(100%)
5000/3000/1500
52(25%)
33(16%)
16(8%)
58(28%)
51(24%)
210(100%)
sum
195(23%)
197(23%)
60(7%)
147(18%)
242(29%)
841(100%)
222
The definitions, mean values, and standard deviations of variables are included in Table 2. Of all the variables, gender,
223
age, family size, education level, and residential area were all available from the Beijing Statistical Office. The variables of
224
gender, age and family size were closed to the official data of the whole population, while the gap between the education
225
level of our samples and official data was comparatively big, indicating a limitation of our sampling. The possible reason
226
is that the most people who refused to be interviewed had low education level. For the socioeconomic factors of the
227
respondents were not significantly different from the general except for education, we consider that our sample is suitable
228
for estimating WTP of the whole population.
229
Table 2. Sample statistics and definition of variables Variable
Mean
Dev
Census
Gender (Male=1, female=0)
0.49
0.5
0.5
Education (Have a college degree =1,Others=0)
0.52
0.5
0.36
Age (More than 55=3,30-55=2,<30=1)
1.81
0.99
1.84
Family size (More than 3 members=1, others=0)
0.36
0.48
0.31
Residence (Living in urban central area =1, Living in
0.6
0.49
0.59
Income (More than 4000=1,less than 4000=0)
0.71
0.45
Job (The respondent has a job currently=1, Others=0)
0.78
0.41
Children (Raising a child younger than 12 currently=1,
0.52
0.5
0.85
0.36
urban suburban area = 0)
others=0) Attitude (Regarding UHI effect mitigation as important=1, Others =0)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Subjective norm (People that important for respondent
0.83
0.38
0.39
0.49
0.72
0.45
0.40
0.49
0.84
0.37
would support his/her pro-environment behavior=1, Others=0) Knowledge of UHI (Know well about the UHI effect =1, others =0) Perceived behavioral control (Have enough resources for participating in UHI mitigation activities=1, Others=0) Knowledge of cool roof (Know well about the cool roof = 1, Others=0) Health (Health condition is good=1,Others=0)
230
4.2 Descriptive analysis
231
Although the concept of UHI effect has been discussed for a long time in the academic field, it is still relatively new to
232
the public, especially in developed context like China. Therefore, it is important to understand how the public get knowledge
233
about the UHI effect. The interview results showed that about 40% (331 respondents) of the respondents had never heard
234
of the UHI effect, which may partially because the UHI effect is relatively difficult to be recognized comparing with other
235
urban environmental problems (sandstorms, haze, flood, etc.), thus unlikely to raise public awareness. Among the
236
respondents that understand the knowledge of the UHI effect, online inquiry was the main channel by which to learn about
237
the UHI effect, with 24% (199 respondents) of the respondents selected that option. 17% (140 respondents) of the
238
respondents got information from the other people (family, friends, teachers, community members, etc.), and Television
239
ranked forth (16%). In addition, 12 respondents get related information from newspapers, 7 people from pro-environment
240
pamphlet and 7 people from the publicity board. The promotion of knowledge with regard to UHI effects needs to be
241
strengthened, and various information dissemination programs are needed to improve citizens’ understanding of UHI effect
242
(Fig.2).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16%
Television Online
40%
Other people Newspaper 24%
Community publicity board Pamphlet No
1%
17%
1%
243 244
1%
Fig.2. Public information sources of the UHI effect
245
In promoting public participation in UHI effect mitigation. More than 80% of respondents reported that government
246
should enhance transparency in urban environmental management, including the disclosure of urban environmental
247
monitoring information (42%) and the use of environmental protection fund (40%). 11% of respondents preferred
248
establishing a rewarding mechanism to stimulate individual pro-environmental behavior, and 5% respondents preferred
249
legal services offered by the government with regard to public supervision and public funding for urban environment issues
250
(Fig. 3).
Environmental monitoring data disclosure
11%
2% 5%
42%
Disclosure the use of environment protection funds Establishing a reward mechanism for proenvironment action
39%
Providing environmental protection legal services Others
251 252 253
Fig.3. Suggestions for government for promoting citizens’ participation UHI effect mitigation.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 254
4.3. Estimation results
255
The estimation result without covariance are presented in Table 3. Maximum likelihood estimation function was applied
256
to estimate the parameter. The spike is 0.297, which is similar to the zero responses (29%) provided in Table 1, which
257
means the estimation data fits our data well. The Wald statistic rejected the null hypothesis that the estimated parameter are
258
zero since the p-value is less than 0.01.
259
The mean annual WTP was estimated to be 1510.854 CHY (220.56 USD) per household. The t-value is 26.747, thus
260
the result is statistically significant at the 1% level. We also obtained the 95% and 99% confidence intervals for the estimate,
261
using Krisky and Robb’s parametric bootstrapping method approach with 5000 replications (McConnell, 1990).
262
Table 3. Estimation result of the model
263
Variables Coef t values Constant 0.721 11.677 Bid 0.001 202.520 Spike 0.327 24.065 MTP 1510.854 26.747 95% confidence interval 1395.888 1624.057 99% confidence interval 1368.400 1663.974 Wald statics 41055.180 Log-likelihood -1463.826 Notes: The unit of mean willingness to pay (MTP) is CHY. *p<0.1, **p<0.05, ***P<0.01
264
4.4. Estimation results with covariates
p values 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
0.000***
265
Independent variables was divided into three groups, and therefore three estimation models are established (Table 4).
266
In model one, only eight demographic attributes were included. According to Kaiser and Fuhrer (2003) and Kollmuss and
267
Agyeman (2010) People who has a deeper knowledge of environment issues and the remedies are more likely to take actions
268
to protect the environment. Variables with regard to environmental knowledge were added in model two (previous
269
knowledge of UHI effect and previous knowledge of cool roof). Model three included attributes with regard to personal
270
belief and perceived resources, which is inspired by the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991). This study applied the
271
partial correlation coefficients analysis prevent common method bias, while the result reported no obvious outliers.
272
In terms of demographic attributes, all of the three models indicated that females are more likely to fund for cool roofs,
273
while the education level and presence of children are also positively related to the likelihood of paying for cool roofs. In
274
model two and model three, respondents aged over 55 are less willing to pay. In model one and model two, health condition
275
has significant impact on respondents’ WTP. As for variables with regard to environmental knowledge, model two and
276
model three indicated that WTP increases with an increase in knowledge with regard to UHI effect and cool roof. The
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 277
results presented in model 3 suggest that respondents’ perceived resources in contributing for cool roof construction and
278
pro-environmental social norm have a positive and significant effect on WTP, while there is no significant linkage between
279
respondents’ attitude and WTP.
280
Table 4. Estimation Result with Covariance Variables
Model 1 Coef -0.404
p values 0.220
Model 2 Coef -0.623
281
Constant Demographic attributes Gender -0.232 0.095* -0.370 Income 0.230 0.214 0.020 Age 30 0.291 0.104 0.104 Age 55 -0.465 0.116 -0.505 Residence 0.067 0.653 -0.090 Job 0.149 0.444 0.203 Family size -0.230 0.157 -0.118 Education 0.398 0.024** 0.476 Presence of children 0.518 0.013** 0.485 Healthy 0.751 0.000*** 0.690 Environmental knowledge Knowledge of UHI 0.597 Knowledge of cool roof 0.861 Belief and perceived resources Attitude Perceived behavior control Subjective norm Bid 0.001 0.000*** 0.001 spike 0.287 0.000*** 0.290 MTP 1134.087 0.000*** 1188.687 95% confidence interval 1049.926 1102.802 99% confidence interval 1026.087 1075.894 Wald statistic 98616.240 0.000*** 103666.490 Log-likelihood -1497.585 -1468.078 Notes: The unit of MTP is CHY, *p<0.1, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01
282
4.5.Discussion of the results
p values 0.065*
Model 3 Coef -1.275
p values 0.001***
0.009*** 0.917 0.572 0.095* 0.551 0.302 0.475 0.009*** 0.024** 0.000***
-0.260 -0.074 0.040 -0.517 -0.023 0.131 -0.148 0.423 0.576 0.116
0.074* 0.699 0.828 0.095* 0.882 0.514 0.379 0.051* 0.003*** 0.563
0.000*** 0.000***
0.369 0.666
0.024** 0.000***
0.192 1.173 0.417 0.001 0.290 1240.286 1154.656 1120.939 103074.778 -1423.276
0.302 0.000*** 0.039** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
0.000***
0.000***
283
The annual mean WTP obtained with no covariates was chosen for calculating the total WTP since the setting of
284
covariates may affect the mean WTP. The mean annual WTP is 1510.854 CHY (220.563 USD), which accounted for 1.2%
285
of the disposable income of Beijing household. The WTP of each hectare of cool roof is 0.76 CHY, which is in line with
286
previous study with regard to Beijing household’s WTP for UHI mitigation techniques (Zhang et al., 2019). According to
287
the official data, the number of households in Beijing amounts to 5.38 million at the survey time. Expanding the mean
288
annual WTP value to the population of Beijing, Beijing households are willing to pay 8.128 billion CHY (1.187 billion
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 289
USD) for promoting the construction of cool roof for UHI effect mitigation. The corresponding 95% and 99% WTP intervals
290
are 7.510 - 8.738 billion CHY (1.096 – 1.276 billion USD) and 7.335 – 8.952 billion CHY (1.071 – 1.307 billion USD),
291
respectively.
292
Due to governance mode and cultural reasons, public participation in urban environmental management is rare. The
293
result of our research that may offer new evidence for promoting public participation in UHI effect mitigation. Descriptive
294
analysis indicated that the majority of residents have great expectation of government affairs openness with regard to urban
295
environment management, which reflects that the transparency and credibility of government should be enhanced. For the
296
determinants of WTP, we added the covariates of attitude, perceived behavior control, social norms, and previous
297
knowledge with regard to UHI effect and cool roofs to the conventional ones. The results indicated that residents' previous
298
knowledge, perceived resources in participating in UHI mitigation activities, and social norms were statistically significant
299
with the likelihood of “yes” response to a given bid, which implies the necessity of publicity and education with regard to
300
UHI mitigation.
301
5. Conclusions
302
Beijing has experienced rapid urban expansion in the past few decades and is now experiencing severe UHI effect.
303
The deterioration of the urban thermal environment is mainly due to the fact that the negative externalities of urban
304
expansion have long been overlooked. The original natural vegetation was replaced by artificial impermeable materials,
305
which worsen the urban thermal environment. In addition, the production activities, urban transportation, and residential
306
life require fuel, which emitted a large amount of heat to the urban environment.
307
As one of the important goals of achieving the sustainability of urban development, improving the urban thermal
308
environment has received extensive attention of the Chinese government. New technologies with regard to UHI mitigation
309
have been promoted and cool roof is one of them.
310
To provide evidence for the related policy making, this paper assesses the economic benefits of promoting cool roofs
311
for mitigating the UHI effect. 841 households in Beijing were interviewed in 2018. DBDC format and spike model is
312
adopted to obtain residents’ WTP and reveal the determinants. The results show that most respondents are willing to pay
313
for the cool roofs. Average annual WTP amounts to 1510.854 CHY (220.563 dollars) per household and the total WTP is
314
8.128 billion CHY (1.187 billion USD). As for the determinants of WTP, other than conventional socio-economic variables,
315
our findings indicated that respondents’ previous knowledge, social norm, and perceived resources has great influence on
316
people's pro-environmental behavior. At last, timely information disclosure with regard to urban environment management
317
and related environmental education are necessary for promoting public participation.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 318
Bases on these conclusions, policy implications were provided as follows:
319
1. Beijing residents have great willingness to pay for mitigating the UHI effect, a special environmental fund might
320
be established to tap the potential source of money for improving urban thermal environment.
321
2. More CVM research on mitigating the UHI effect is necessary for these studies can provide a new evidence for the
322
formulation of relevant policies.
323
3. In order to improve residents' participation in urban environmental improvement, timely disclosure of related
324
information is necessary, especially the use of environmental protection funds.
325
4. The enhancement of knowledge of UHI effects is urgent. Therefore, various information carriers should be
326
encouraged to promote the dissemination of knowledge related to UHI effects.
327
Appendix A. Notation and abbreviation list UHI
Urban heat island
MOHURD
China's Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development
DOE
US Department of Energy
NOAA
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
TPB
the theory of planned behavior
CHY
Chinese Yuan
CVM
Contingent valuation method
USD
US dollars
WTP
Willingness to pay
MTP
Mean willingness to pay
DC
Dichotomous choice format
SBDC
Single-bounded dichotomous choice
DBDC
Double-bounded dichotomous choice
cdf
Cumulative distribution function
328 329
References:
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 330
Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179-211.
331
Arrow, K., 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58(3), 48-56.
332
Baranzini, A., et al., 2010. Tropical forest conservation: Attitudes and preferences. Forest Policy & Economics 12(5),
333
370-376.
334
Carson, R.T., et al., 2001. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics
335
19(2), 173-210.
336
China, D.o.P.C.o., 1994. China's Agenda 21. Environmental Science Press, Beijing.
337
China, M.o.H.a.U.-R.D.o., 2006. Evaluation Standard for Green building (GB/T 50378-2006).
338
Cui, Y., et al., 2017. Temporal and spatial characteristics of the urban heat island in Beijing and the impact on building
339
design and energy performance. Energy 130, 286-297.
340
Egan, K.J., et al., 2015. Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation surveys: Convergent validity,
341
discount rates, and mental accounting. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 72, 123-136.
342
Franceschi, D., F. Vásquez, W., 2011. Do Supervisors Affect the Valuation of Public Goods?
343
Gao, Y., et al., 2014. Cool roofs in China: Policy review, building simulations, and proof-of-concept experiments. Energy
344
Policy 74, 190-214.
345
Ge, R., et al., 2016. Impacts of urbanization on the urban thermal environment in Beijing.
346
Huang, G., 2015. PM 2.5 opened a door to public participation addressing environmental challenges in China.
347
Environmental pollution 197, 313-315.
348
Ihara, T., et al., 2011. Estimation of mild health disorder caused by urban air temperature increase with midpoint-type
349
impact assessment methodology. Journal of Environmental Engineering 76(662), 459-467.
350
Jiang, F., 2012. Experimental study on insulating effect of solar reflecting roofs and energy saving. Wall Mater. Innov.
351
Energy Saving Build. 3, 46–48.
352
Kaiser, F.G., Fuhrer, U., 2003. Ecological Behavior's Dependency on Different Forms of Knowledge. Applied
353
Psychology 52(4), 598-613.
354
Kennedy, E.H., et al., 2009. Why we don't "walk the talk": Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in
355
Canada. Human Ecology Review 16(2), 151-160.
356
Kim, D.H., et al., 2016. Metropolitan residents' preferences and willingness to pay for a life zone forest for mitigating heat
357
island effects during summer season in Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(11).
358
Kim, H.-J., et al., 2017. The Korean public's willingness to pay for expanding the use of solid refuse fuel. Renewable and
359
Sustainable Energy Reviews 72, 821-827.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 360
Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., 2010. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-
361
environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3), 239-260.
362
Kristrom, B., 1997. Spike Models in Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3), 1013-
363
1023.
364
Kwon, Y.J., et al., 2018. Assessment of the conservation value of Munseom area in Jeju Island, South Korea.
365
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1-8.
366
Laitila, T., 2004. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual: Bateman, I.J., R.T. Carson, B. Day,
367
M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Özdemiroglu, D.W. Pearce, R. Sugden and
368
J. Swanson, Edward Elgar, Ltd. Cheltenham. Ecological Economics 50(1), 155-156.
369
Lim, H.-J., Yoo, S.-H., 2014. Train travel passengers' willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions in Korea.
370
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32, 526-531.
371
Longo, A., 2012. Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation. Environmental & Resource
372
Economics 51(1), 119-140.
373
McConnell, K.E., 1990. Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation.
374
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18(1), 19-34.
375
Mitchell, R., Carson, R., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The contingent Valuation Method. New York: RFF
376
Press. .
377
Mobley, C., et al., 2010. Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of
378
environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior 42(4), 420-447.
379
Morawetz, U.B., Koemle, D.B.A., 2017. Contingent valuation of measures against urban heat: Limitations of a frequently
380
used method. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 143(3).
381
Oğuz, D., et al., 2010. Environmental awareness of university students in Ankara, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural
382
Research 5(19), 2629-2636.
383
Santagata, W., Signorello, G., 2000. Contingent Valuation of a Cultural Public Good and Policy Design: The Case of
384
``Napoli Musei Aperti''. Journal of Cultural Economics 24(3), 181-204.
385
Santamouri, M., et al., 2013. Energy and climate in the urban built environment.
386
Santamouris, M., 2014. Cooling the cities – A review of reflective and green roof mitigation technologies to fight heat
387
island and improve comfort in urban environments. Solar Energy 103, 682-703.
388
Simões, F., 2016. Consumer Behavior and Sustainable Development in China: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in
389
Environmental Policymaking. Sustainability 8(9), 897.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 390
Soon, J.-J., Ahmad, S.-A., 2015. Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for renewable
391
energy use. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44, 877-887.
392
Spash, C.L., et al., 2009. Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics,
393
ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68(4), 955-964.
394
Stafoggia, M., et al., 2008. Factors affecting in-hospital heat-related mortality: A multi-city case-crossover analysis.
395
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62(3), 209-215.
396
Synnefa, A., Santamouris, M., 2012. Advances on technical, policy and market aspects of cool roof technology in Europe:
397
The Cool Roofs project. Energy and Buildings 55, 35-41.
398
United Nations, D.o.E.a.S.A., Population Division, 2017. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision.
399
Venkatachalam, L., 2004. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24(1),
400
89-124.
401
Vicente-Molina, M.A., et al., 2013. Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour:
402
comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 61, 130-138.
403
Xu, X., et al., 2018. Impacts of urbanization and air pollution on building energy demands — Beijing case study. Applied
404
Energy 225, 98-109.
405
Yang, W., 2014. Research of energy saveing effect of cool roof. China Building Materials Science & Technology 01.
406
Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., 2002. Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous
407
choice contingent valuation surveys. Applied Economics Letters 9(14), 929-932.
408
Zhang, L., et al., 2019. Households' willingness to pay for green roof for mitigating heat island effects in Beijing (China).
409
Building and Environment 150, 13-20.
410
Zhang, Y., et al., 2016. Willingness to Pay for Measures of Managing the Health Effects of Heat Wave in Beijing, China:
411
a Cross-sectional Survey. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 29(9), 628-638.
412
Zsóka, Á., et al., 2013. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer
413
behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner
414
Production 48, 126-138.
415
Volume 1.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights: 1. Willingness to pay for cool roofs for mitigating urban heat island effect is estimated. 2. The annual mean willingness to pay 1510.854 Chinese Yuan. 3. TPB theory and environmental knowledge can greatly explain pro-environment behavior. 4. Government credibility and education is important in promoting public participation.