Accepted Manuscript Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction under Spontaneous Ventilation Long Jiang, MD, PhD, Jun Liu, MD, PhD, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, MD, Yaron Shargall, MD, Martin Kolb, MD, PhD, Wenlong Shao, MD, PhD, Qinglong Dong, MD, Lixia Liang, MD, Jianxing He, MD, PhD PII:
S0022-5223(18)30405-7
DOI:
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.153
Reference:
YMTC 12621
To appear in:
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Received Date: 20 May 2017 Revised Date:
2 November 2017
Accepted Date: 26 December 2017
Please cite this article as: Jiang L, Liu J, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Shargall Y, Kolb M, Shao W, Dong Q, Liang L, He J, Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction under Spontaneous Ventilation, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.jtcvs.2017.12.153. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction
2
under Spontaneous Ventilation
3
Long Jiang, MD, PhD1; Jun Liu, MD, PhD1; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, MD2; Yaron
5
Shargall, MD3; Martin Kolb, MD, PhD4; Wenlong Shao, MD, PhD1; Qinglong Dong,
6
MD5; Lixia Liang, MD5; Jianxing He, MD, PhD1
SC
7
1
M AN U
8 9
RI PT
4
Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical
University; Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key
11
Laboratory of Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for
12
Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.
TE D
10
13 14
2
15
Coruña, Spain.
16
AC C
EP
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Coruña University Hospital, Xubias 84, 15006.
17
3
18
Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
19
Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, McMaster University/St.
20
4
21
Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
22
Department of Medicine, Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University,
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 23
5
24
University.
Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical
25
LJ and JL contributed equally to this work.
27
Written on behalf of AME Thoracic Surgery Collaborative Group.
RI PT
26
28
Conflict of interest statement and source of funding: None.
SC
29
M AN U
30
Correspondence to: Jianxing He, MD, PhD, FACS. Department of Thoracic
32
Surgery/Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University;
33
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of
34
Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, No.
35
151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, China. Email:
[email protected]
TE D
31
36
39 40 41 42 43 44
EP
38
Word count: 3047
AC C
37
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 45
Glossary of Abbreviations:
46
VATS=video
47
CT=computed tomography; PET=positron emission tomography; ASA=American
48
Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI=body mass index; BIS=bispectral index; VAS=
49
Visual Analogue Scale.
thorocoscopic
50
SV=spontaneous
ventilation;
Central Picture Legend: Specific lesions and details of tracheal resection.
SC
51
surgery;
RI PT
assisted
M AN U
52 53
Central Message: SV-VATS is a feasible procedure in airway surgery in highly
54
selected patients. It can be a valid alternative to conventional intubated VATS for
55
airway surgery.
TE D
56
Perspective statement: During conventional intubated tracheal and carinal surgery,
58
airway management includes several challenges related to tube management without
59
interfering with the surgical field and maintaining ventilation with favorable
60
oxygenation. SV-VATS technique is a feasible procedure in airway surgery.
62 63 64 65 66
AC C
61
EP
57
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Structured Abstract
68
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe and assess the techniques of
69
spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SV-VATS) for
70
tracheal/carinal resections and compare the outcomes with the conventional
71
thoracoscopic intubated method.
RI PT
67
72
Methods: From May 2015 to November 2016, some 18 consecutive patients with
74
malignant or benign diseases invading distal trachea and carina who met the criteria
75
for SV were treated by SV-VATS resection. To evaluate the feasibility of this novel
76
technique, they were compared with a control group consisting of 14 consecutive
77
patients with the same diseases who underwent VATS resection using intubated
78
general anesthesia from October 2014 to April 2015. Data were collected with a
79
median follow-up of 10.2 months 75 (range:1-27).
M AN U
TE D
80
SC
73
Results: The SV-VATS group consisted of 4 carinal resections and 14 tracheal
82
resections. In the control group, 2 patients underwent carinal resection and 12
83
underwent tracheal resection. Median operative time was shorter in the SV-VATS
84
group compared with the intubated group (162.5 min vs. 260 min), as was the median
85
time for tracheal end-to-end anastomosis (22.5 min vs. 45 min) and carinal
86
reconstruction (40 min vs. 86 min). The lowest oxygen saturation during the
87
procedure was 94.2±4.9% in SV-VATS group and 93.9±4.5% in the control group.
88
The peak CO2 level at the end of expiration was higher in the SV-VATS group
AC C
EP
81
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (47.7±4.2mmHg vs. 39.1±5.7mmHg). No conversion to tracheal intubation was
90
needed in the SV-VATS group. Postoperative complications occurred in six patients in
91
the SV-VATS group and nine in the control group. Patients who undergoing SV-VATS
92
had a trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stays (11.5±4.3d vs. 13.2±6.3d). One
93
recurrence (SV-VATS group) and two deaths (one in each group) were observed
94
during follow-up.
RI PT
89
SC
95
Conclusions: SV-VATS is a feasible procedure in tracheal and carinal resection and
97
reconstruction in highly selected patients. It can be a valid alternative to conventional
98
intubated VATS for airway surgery.
99
101 102
TE D
100
M AN U
96
Key Words: spontaneous ventilation; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; trachea;
104
carina; resection and reconstruction.
106 107 108 109 110
AC C
105
EP
103
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction
112
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been reported as feasible and safe in
113
technically demanding complex tracheal and carinal surgery[1-3]. However,
114
morbidity is not completely eliminated, with potential risks posed by conventional
115
intubation and general anesthesia. Deep anesthesia and intravenous analgesics
116
(primarily opioids) have deleterious
117
postoperative complications[4,5]. Mechanical ventilation may cause airway
118
pressure-induced injury by lung over-distension[6,7]. Endotracheal intubation can
119
also result in sore throat, mucosal ulceration and airway injury[8].
RI PT
111
associated
with
M AN U
SC
systemic side-effects
120
Spontaneous ventilation VATS(SV-VATS) has recently been extensively investigated
122
and has been reported to reduce the adverse effects of tracheal intubation and general
123
anesthesia.[9-15] It has been advocated as an alternative to conventional intubated
124
anesthesia for a variety of VATS procedures.[12,16,17] Our experience mirrored that
125
of previous studies, demonstrating that patients operated under SV-VATS had a
126
shorter post-operative recovery time, and were able to eat and mobilize earlier
127
compared with the conventional endotracheal ventilation VATS approach[18,19].
128
However, whether the SV-VATS technique can offer benefits for tracheal surgery is
129
unknown. In the present study, we have expanded the SV-VATS application to include
130
tracheal and carinal resections and reconstructions, and compared its outcomes with
131
conventional intubated methods.
132
AC C
EP
TE D
121
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 133
Material and methods
135
Between October 2014 and November 2016, clinical data for all consecutive patients
136
undergoing VATS tracheal or carinal resection and reconstruction were analyzed. The
137
patients in the control group received combined intravenous anesthesia using a
138
single-lumen 6.5mm endotracheal tube (Well Lead, Inc, Guangzhou, Guangdong,
139
China) for one-lung ventilation at the start of the procedures. Cross-field ventilation
140
was used during the tracheal and carinal procedures. During the operation, the
141
cross-field endobronchial tube can be introduced through either the operating port or
142
an additional port[1]. Patients undergoing tracheal or carinal resection using
143
conventional intubation were compared to those undergoing SV-VATS. The study was
144
approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Research
145
Ethics Committee.
SC
M AN U
TE D
146
RI PT
134
Preoperative evaluation
148
Cardiac and pulmonary functions were evaluated preoperatively using cardiac 2D
149
echo, electrocardiogram and pulmonary function tests. Routine preoperative
150
evaluation to exclude distant metastases included thoracic and abdominal contrast
151
computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET-CT) scan,
152
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, and bone scintigraphy. Any
153
ambiguities on the results were resolved by holding a multidisciplinary consultation to
154
decide whether an operation was necessary. During patient evaluation, if
AC C
EP
147
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 155
bronchoscopic evaluation revealed more than 70%-80% obstruction of the trachea, a
156
wire loop electrocautery was used to resect the majority of the tumor before tracheal
157
resection as described in a previous report[20].
RI PT
158
Indications for SV-VATS anesthesia
160
Patients eligible for SV-VATS fulfilled the following criteria: ASA grade of I-II, and a
161
body mass index (BMI) <25. Patients with a bleeding disorder, sleep apnea, evidence
162
of pleural adhesions, unfavorable airway features (such as congenital pulmonary
163
airway malformation) or spinal anatomical characteristics were not eligible for this
164
procedure. In addition, preoperative bronchoscopic examination was performed in
165
each case to confirm pathology, as well as the extent of tumor involvement evaluated
166
via multiple biopsies. In our center, we consider patients eligible for resection if they
167
have a resectable airway lesion involving no more than 4cm of the trachea. Whether
168
the SV-VATS or conventional technique was used was determined by surgeon’s
169
preference.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
170
SC
159
171
Anesthetic and surgical management in SV-VATS procedures
172
Anesthetic Considerations
173
Details of the anesthetic procedure were described in our previous report[21]. In short,
174
anesthesia was induced with the target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (target
175
plasma concentration of 2-3ug/ml) and sufentanil 0.1-0.2 ug/kg. Muscle relaxants
176
were not used. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring was maintained at 40 to 60 during
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the operation. The spontaneous respiration rate was 12 to 20/min. During spontaneous
178
ventilation, a gradual and natural collapse of the operative lung occurred allowing
179
maximal visualization of the lungs after making the incisions. To reduce cough
180
induced by thoracoscopic manipulations, under direct thoracoscopic vision vagus
181
nerve block was performed and 2% lidocaine was sprayed on the surface of the
182
lung[22].
RI PT
177
SC
183
Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration of 1-2
185
ug/ml), dexmedetomidine 0.5-1 ug/kg/h and remifentanil 0.05 ug/kg/min. Incisions
186
were performed after local application of 1% lidocaine. Optimally, the intercostal
187
muscle and pleura were infiltrated under direct vision or palpation through the skin
188
incision. The patients’ electrocardiogram (ECG), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP),
189
pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), respiratory rate
190
(RR) and BIS were continuously monitored. During the procedure, a laryngeal mask
191
was used for oxygen inhalation, with an oxygen flow of 4-5 L/min, keeping oxygen
192
saturation above 95%. Endotracheal ventilation and cross-field ventilation were also
193
prepared as backup in case of an emergency situation, such as hypoxemia, requiring
194
peri-operative conversion of the intubation method.
TE D
EP
AC C
195
M AN U
184
196
Surgical techniques
197
Surgical preparation for all patients was identical. All patients were positioned in a
198
left lateral decubitus position. Three incisions were made: a 10-mm camera port, at
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the seventh intercostal space along the right anterior axillary line; a 4-cm main
200
operative port, located at the fourth intercostal space on the right anterolateral chest
201
wall; and a 10-mm port, at the seventh intercostal space along the right posterior
202
axillary line. We used a flexible bronchoscope through the laryngeal mask to identify
203
the proximal and distal extent of the lesion. If lung resection was needed, it was
204
performed followed by lymph node dissection.
SC
205
RI PT
199
The azygous vein was dissected and divided, if needed, using a 35-mm Endo cutter
207
(Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ). The parietal pleura was then opened from this point
208
extending toward the apex, along the lateral side of the superior vena cava. This
209
maneuver allowed the trachea and proximal bronchus to be mobilized with a
210
combination of blunt dissection and Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ).
211
Right paratracheal lymph nodes were also removed to aid with exposure and
212
mobilization of the airway if necessary. Extra attention was taken during this
213
dissection to protect the bronchial arteries and vagus nerve. The right vagus nerve was
214
identified and carefully moved to one side. We sometimes suspended it to the
215
posterior chest wall with 3-0 polypropylene (Prolene, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ). A
216
silicon sling was then placed around the trachea and each of the bronchi. Extra 3-0
217
Prolene retraction sutures were also placed in each of the airways. This technique
218
allowed retraction and exposure of the airway for further resection and reconstruction.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
206
219 220
Preoperative bronchoscopic examination was performed to confirm pathology, as well
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT as the extent of tumor involvement evaluated via multiple biopsies. According to the
222
biopsies, the resection was performed 5 to 10mm above and below the tumor margins.
223
If the lesion was malignant, we resected the trachea on the near position of tumor
224
cell-free. Two types of surgical procedures were performed in our study: tracheal
225
resection with end-to-end anastomosis and carinal resection and reconstruction with
226
two sets of anastomosis(Fig.2/3). Cervical extension was sometimes changed to a
227
lower degree to allow the trachea to move into the mediastinum before the initiation
228
of anastomosis. Anastomosis was carried out using a continuous 3-0 Prolene suture,
229
starting from the posterior cartilaginous tissue followed by the membranous section.
230
For carina reconstruction, we performed the resection of the carina first, followed by a
231
total end-to-end anastomosis between the left main bronchus and the trachea, and
232
finally anastomosis of the right main bronchus to the lateral, cartilaginous wall of the
233
trachea. After end-to-end suture of the trachea, we used additional 3-0 Prolene
234
tension-reduction suture to strengthen and protect the anastomosis. We did not use
235
muscle flaps or other tissues to protect the anastomosis. And we do not perform hilar
236
release.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
237
RI PT
221
238
Following completion of the anastomosis, we used a saline solution to test for
239
evidence of air leaks. If any air leak was observed, additional stitches were used to
240
reinforce the suture until intraoperative air leak test was confirmed negative. Only one
241
chest tube is placed at the end of the operation.(Video 1)
242
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT At the end of the surgery, a bronchoscopy was used to check the integrity of the
244
anastomosis and, if there were concerns with sputum retention, any airway secretion
245
was cleared. Upon completion of the operation, stitches between the chin and chest or
246
philadelphia cervical collars were placed to avoid excessive tension in the early
247
postoperative stage.
RI PT
243
248
Postoperative care in both groups
250
Patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) if necessary according to the
251
intraoperative and anesthesia situations in the operating room and during recovery.
252
Chest X-ray and bedside ultrasound were performed for evaluation on the same day.
253
The voice was accessed by otolaryngologists using a professional speech and voice
254
analysis
255
anti-inflammatory drugs or a fentanyl patch were used if necessary. Formal pain
256
assessment for the study was carried out on the morning of post-operative day 1 using
257
the Visual analogue scales (VAS: 0 is completely pain-free and 10 is hard to tolerate).
M AN U Index).
Painkillers,
such
as
non-steroidal
EP
TE D
Disorder
AC C
258
system(Voice
SC
249
259
Statistical Analysis
260
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median and interquartile
261
range (IQR) depend on the distribution. The 95% confidence intervals are also
262
reported. Categorical variables are given as a count and percentage of patients. Some
263
variables were not-normally distributed (surgical duration, time of tracheal end-to-end
264
anastomosis, time of carinal reconstruction, intraoperative blood loss), so median(IQR)
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 265
was summarized. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows
266
(SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
267
RI PT
268
Results
270
Between October 2014 and November 2016, a total of eighteen patients underwent
271
SV-VATS tracheal/carinal resection and reconstruction for benign or malignant
272
diseases in our center (trachea:14; carina: 4) (Group 1- SV-VATS). This group was
273
compared to a group of patients consisting of fourteen patients that underwent
274
conventionally intubated VATS procedures(trachea: 12; carina: 2) during the same
275
period of time (Group 2- control group). Age, sex, body mass index(BMI),
276
comorbidities, pulmonary and cardiac functions, lesion size, distance from vocal
277
cords, bronchoscopic biopsy patch and pathological diagnosis did not differ between
278
the two groups. However, the ASA status was different between both groups as there
279
were no grade III patients in the SV-VATS group whereas 4 patients with an ASA
280
grade III were included in the control group. (Table.1)
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
281
SC
269
282
Operative and Anesthetic Data
283
The same surgical team performed on all these airway surgery. Patients in the
284
SV-VATS group had shorter median durations of operative time (162.5 min vs. 260
285
min), tracheal end-to-end anastomosis time (22.5 min vs. 45 min) and carinal
286
reconstruction time (40 min vs. 86 min) compared with the intubated group. The two
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT groups had comparable blood loss, numbers of dissected lymph nodes and length of
288
tracheal excision. Final pathologic results showed positive surgical margins in 4
289
patients, all were confirmed adenoid cystic carcinoma (SV-VATS:1 vs. control
290
group:3). (Table.2)
RI PT
287
291
During the procedures, the mean lowest oxygen saturation was 94.2±4.9% in
293
SV-VATS group and 93.9±4.5% in the control group. The mean peak EtCO2 in the
294
SV-VATS group was higher than that in the intubated group (47.7±4.2 vs. 39.1±5.7)
295
due to mild hypercapnia under spontaneous ventilation anesthesia. No conversion to
296
tracheal intubation was needed in the SV-VATS group.
297
M AN U
SC
292
Postoperative Recovery
299
The post-operative VAS scores of both groups were similar(SV-VATS: 2.7±0.8 vs.
300
control: 2.6±0.8). The median ICU stay was one day in the SV-VATS group and 2
301
days in the intubated group. Additionally, patients who underwent SV-VATS had a
302
trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.5±4.3d vs. 13.2±6.3d).
EP
AC C
303
TE D
298
304
Postoperative complications occurred in six patients in the SV-VATS group and nine
305
in the control group (Table.3). In the SV-VATS group, anastomotic stenosis occurred
306
in one patient which was successfully managed with placement of stents. In the
307
intubated group, anastomotic fistula occurred in one patient and was repaired by
308
reoperation. There were no cases of perioperative mortality.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 309
Survival and follow-up
311
During a median follow-up time of 10.2 months, the minimal diameter of tracheal
312
anastomotic position on Chest CT six months postoperatively was comparable in both
313
groups (1.8±0.2cm vs. 1.6±0.4cm).
RI PT
310
314
For patients with malignant disease, the final results of tumor stage are shown in
316
Table 4. Six patients in the SV-VATS group and three in the intubated group received
317
adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy (Table.3). One recurrence and two deaths were
318
observed during the follow-up time. Mortality was 6.2% during follow-up.
M AN U
SC
315
319
TE D
320
Discussion
322
During conventional intubated tracheal and carinal surgery, airway management may
323
present several challenges. Most significantly is the challenge of maintaining
324
ventilation with favorable oxygenation using an endotracheal tube which can
325
sometimes interfere with the surgical field[23]. Cross-field ventilation is a universally
326
accepted strategy for conventional intubated VATS for airway surgery. However, this
327
endobronchial tube may obstruct the view of the anastomosis site and may require
328
periodical retraction during anastomosis to improve exposure. High-frequency jet
329
ventilation (HFJV) via the lumen of the blocker tube was reported to help achieve
330
one-lung ventilation without causing injury to the tumor. However, there have been
AC C
EP
321
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concerns that the use of HFJV could contribute to acute respiratory distress
332
syndrome[24]. While the SV technique is likely not possible to be performed during
333
thoracotomy, it is a valid option for VATS cases, as demonstrated both in our own
334
experience and recent literature. Since most of our practice, including airways
335
resection and reconstruction, is performed thoracoscopically, it allowed us to
336
carry-out this comparative study of conventional VATS intubation airways
337
reconstruction with SV-VATS. Our study suggests that the SV-VATS technique
338
facilitates the anesthetic and surgical procedures.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
331
339
Without the endotracheal tube the trachea is more flexible with a wider range of
341
motion during resection and anastomosis. During the spontaneous ventilation
342
anesthetic procedure, we use a laryngeal mask to protect the airway and aid the
343
intubation procedure in the event emergency intubation is required. Avoiding the use
344
of the endotracheal tube gives surgeons the advantage of an unobstructed view of the
345
surgical field. Because of this, the anastomosis and reconstruction were much faster
346
when compared with the intubated procedures, which resulted in an overall reduction
347
of the operative time.
EP
AC C
348
TE D
340
349
We demonstrated that SV-VATS was feasible without a need for conversion. Though
350
some hypercapnia was noted compared to the control group, especially during the
351
anastomosis phase; in this case, we have found that temporary suspension of operative
352
maneuvers and measures to maintain adequate hemostasis around the trachea will
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT result in the decrease of EtCO2. Our experience has also shown such hypercapnia to
354
be well tolerated without affecting the hemodynamics or surgical procedures. Of note,
355
it has previously been suggested that permissive hypercapnia may, in fact, improve
356
hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion match and provide protective effects on
357
inflammatory responses[25].
RI PT
353
358
During the course of this study, we also developed some tips and tricks regarding the
360
technique. Fire within the chest cavity is a well-documented event during airway
361
surgery[26] that poses dangers to the patient as well as to the operating theatre
362
personnel. The improved management of airway fire during airway surgery is based
363
on prevention. We reinforce coordination and communication between the anesthetic
364
and surgical teams, and systematically use suction to decrease the amount of oxygen
365
near the electrocautery. During these procedures, we used a harmonic endocutter to
366
reduce the risk of airway fire after resection of the trachea. Also at this point the
367
resulting smoke if using electrocautery could affect the oxygen supply and/or increase
368
the patients’ airway sensitivity. For patients who inhale too deeply or who have a
369
longer remaining membranous portion after initial resection of the trachea that is
370
likely to result in obstruction of the airway during inhalation, a small fine tube such as
371
nasal oxygen catheter can be placed in the distal portion of the trachea. This tube is
372
used to prevent complete closure of the distal trachea and to protect the spontaneous
373
breathing of the patient after the resection and during the beginning of anastomosis.
374
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
359
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 375
In our study, the mortality was 6.2% during the follow-up time of 10.2 months, which
376
is consistent with mortality rates of previous reports ranging from 4% to
377
12.7%[27,28]. There were four positive margins(SV-VATS:1, IVATS:3), all of which
378
were adenoid cystic carcinoma,
379
frozen section intraoperatively. This might be due to the intrinsic property of adenoid
380
cystic carcinoma, which spread most commonly by direct extension, submucosal or
381
perineural invasion, in transverse and longitudinal planes. Patients who underwent
382
SV-VATS had a trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stays. This consideration
383
is particularly important in China, where primary care at a patient´s home town is not
384
widely available. We believe our SV-VATS technique allows early discharge without
385
undue worries about patient safety after discharge home.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
though margins were confirmed tumor-free by
TE D
386
The promising outcomes of the SV-VATS may partially be the result of careful patient
388
selection, as outlined earlier in the discussion of our methods. Physical condition
389
should also be taken into consideration. None of the patients in our study received
390
neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy because no metastatic disease was found by
391
preoperative evaluation. At the current time, we do not consider neo-adjuvant
392
radio-chemotherapy in newly diagnosed N2 patients requiring carinal reconstruction
393
mainly because of its association with anastomosis-related complications and
394
operative mortality[29]. We assume that strict preoperative patient selection, good
395
preoperative preparation, and improved postoperative care might have contributed to
396
these encouraging results.
AC C
EP
387
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 397
To ensure patient safety, some clearly defined protocol for elective or urgent
399
intubation must be determined prior to the operation. We have listed some reasons for
400
conversion to general anesthesia in table 5. In addition, intubation in the lateral
401
decubitus position is a technical challenge for anesthesiologists. The anesthesiologist
402
must be skilled in placing a double-lumen tube, laryngeal mask, fibrotic
403
bronchoscopic intubation, video-assisted system management and endobronchial
404
blocker in order to securely choose the most appropriate device depending on the
405
patient’s airway, the position of the patient, time of completion of the procedure and
406
the causes that have led to conversion to general anesthesia[30]. We think continuous
407
and effective communication between surgeons and anesthesiologists is paramount.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
398
TE D
408
As this is a preliminary feasibility study some limitations should be acknowledged.
410
First, it is retrospective in nature and bias between the study arms cannot be
411
completely excluded. Second, due to the relative infrequency of such complex surgery,
412
the cohort size is small, limiting the power of analysis and conclusions. Third, the
413
selection criteria itself, specifically in regards to BMI, were designed for a Chinese
414
population. We cannot be certain that our findings are necessarily applicable for
415
populations outside China. For Western populations, for example, the BMI inclusion
416
criteria can perhaps be raised to a BMI of <30[31].
AC C
EP
409
417 418
In conclusion, in our experience, SV-VATS for tracheal and carinal resections was
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 419
feasible. The SV-VATS technique offered shorter operative times and potentially
420
faster recovery than the conventional intubated method. Further prospective research
421
is needed to confirm the validity of these results.
RI PT
422 423 424
Reference
425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456
1. Li J, Wang W, Jiang L, Yin W, Liu J, et al. (2016) Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Resection and
SC
Reconstruction of Carina and Trachea for Malignant or Benign Disease in 12 Patients: Three Centers' Experience in China. Ann Thorac Surg 102: 295-303.
2. Zhao G, Dong C, Yang M, Du X, Hu X (2014) Totally thoracoscopic tracheoplasty for a squamous cell
M AN U
carcinoma of the mediastinal trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 98: 1109-1111.
3. Jiao W, Zhu D, Cheng Z, Zhao Y (2015) Thoracoscopic tracheal resection and reconstruction for adenoid cystic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 99: e15-17.
4. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Kelley SD, Chamoun NG, Manberg PJ, et al. (2012) Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a "triple low" of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology 116: 1195-1203. 5. Hausman MS, Jr., Jewell ES, Engoren M (2015) Regional versus general anesthesia in surgical
TE D
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does avoiding general anesthesia reduce the risk of postoperative complications? Anesth Analg 120: 1405-1412. 6. Gothard J (2006) Lung injury after thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19: 5-10.
7. Della Rocca G, Coccia C (2013) Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 26:
EP
40-46.
8. Fitzmaurice BG, Brodsky JB (1999) Airway rupture from double-lumen tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 13: 322-329.
AC C
9. Chen JS, Cheng YJ, Hung MH, Tseng YD, Chen KC, et al. (2011) Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Surg 254: 1038-1043.
10. Hung MH, Hsu HH, Chen KC, Chan KC, Cheng YJ, et al. (2013) Nonintubated thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for lung tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 96: 1209-1215.
11. Wu CY, Chen JS, Lin YS, Tsai TM, Hung MH, et al. (2013) Feasibility and safety of nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for geriatric lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg 95: 405-411.
12. Mineo TC, Pompeo E, Mineo D, Tacconi F, Marino M, et al. (2006) Awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Surg 243: 131-136. 13. Pompeo E, Mineo D, Rogliani P, Sabato AF, Mineo TC (2004) Feasibility and results of awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 78: 1761-1768. 14. Tacconi F, Pompeo E, Fabbi E, Mineo TC (2010) Awake video-assisted pleural decortication for empyema thoracis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37: 594-601. 15. Pompeo E, Tacconi F, Mineo D, Mineo TC (2007) The role of awake video-assisted thoracoscopic
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
499
surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 786-790. 16. Chen KC, Cheng YJ, Hung MH, Tseng YD, Chen JS (2012) Nonintubated thoracoscopic lung resection: a 3-year experience with 285 cases in a single institution. J Thorac Dis 4: 347-351. 17. Chen JF, Lin JB, Tu YR, Lin M, Li X, et al. (2016) Nonintubated transareolar single-port thoracic sympathicotomy with a needle scope in a series of 85 male patients. Surg Endosc 30: 3447-3453. 18. Liu J, Cui F, Li S, Chen H, Shao W, et al. (2015) Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
RI PT
under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov 22: 123-130.
19. Liu J, Cui F, Pompeo E, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Chen H, et al. (2016) The impact of non-intubated versus intubated anaesthesia on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50: 920-925.
SC
20. Shao W, Shen J, Ying W, He J (2016) Mediastinoscopic tracheal resection and reconstruction under spontaneous-breathing anesthesia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151: e105-107. 21. Guo Z, Yin W, Wang W, Zhang J, Zhang X, et al. (2016) Spontaneous ventilation anaesthesia: total
M AN U
intravenous anaesthesia with local anaesthesia or thoracic epidural anaesthesia for thoracoscopic bullectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50: 927-932.
22. Li S, Jiang L, Ang KL, Chen H, Dong Q, et al. (2016) New tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
23. Nakanishi R, Yamashita T, Muranaka K, Shinohara K (2013) Thoracoscopic carinal resection and reconstruction in a patient with mucoepidermoid carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145: 1134-1135.
TE D
24. Porhanov VA, Poliakov IS, Selvaschuk AP, Grechishkin AI, Sitnik SD, et al. (2002) Indications and results of sleeve carinal resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22: 685-694. 25. Sinclair SE, Kregenow DA, Lamm WJ, Starr IR, Chi EY, et al. (2002) Hypercapnic acidosis is protective in an in vivo model of ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166: 403-408. 26. Bowdle TA, Glenn M, Colston H, Eisele D (1987) Fire following use of electrocautery during
EP
emergency percutaneous transtracheal ventilation. Anesthesiology 66: 697-698. 27. Lanuti M, Mathisen DJ (2004) Carinal resection. Thorac Surg Clin 14: 199-209. 28. Block MI, Khitin LM, Sade RM (2006) Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Ann Thorac Surg 82: 6-11; discussion 11-12.
AC C
457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498
29. de Perrot M, Fadel E, Mercier O, Mussot S, Chapelier A, et al. (2006) Long-term results after carinal resection for carcinoma: does the benefit warrant the risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131: 81-89.
30. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Bonome C, Fieira E, Aymerich H, Fernandez R, et al. (2016) Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections: the future of thoracic surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49: 721-731. 31. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Aymerich H, Bonome C, Fieira E (2015) From Open Operations to Nonintubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Minimizing the Trauma to the Patient. Ann Thorac Surg 100: 2003-2005.
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure legends
501
Figure 1. Specific lesions and details of tracheal and carinal resection and
502
reconstruction. a,c. chest reconstructed computed tomography. b,d. surgical resection
503
plan.
RI PT
500
504
Figure 2. Key techniques in tracheal resection and reconstruction. a. determine the
506
tumor margins under bronchoscopic view; b. mobilize the trachea and resect the
507
tumor; c. end-to-end anastomosis of the trachea starting from the distal corner of the
508
posterior tracheal wall; d. End-to-end anastomosis being completed.
M AN U
SC
505
509
Figure 3. Key techniques in carinal resection and reconstruction. a. mobilize the
511
trachea and bronchus, and resect the tumor; b. end-to-end anastomosis of the distal
512
trachea and the left main bronchus starting from the posterior tracheal wall; c. right
513
main bronchus being implanted into the aperture; d. carinal reconstruction being
514
completed.
EP
AC C
515
TE D
510
516
Video legend: The surgical procedure of SV-VATS carina resection and
517
reconstruction.
518 519 520 521
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients. SV-VATS events
Control events
n=18
n=14
Age, y(median, range)
49(16-59)
36(16-74)
(95% CI)
[36-51]
[30-52]
Male
10(56)
10(71)
Female
8(44)
4(29)
mass
M AN U
Body
SC
Sex(%)
index, 21.7±2.1
kg/m2(mean± ±SD)
[20.6-22.8]
(95% CI)
[18-27.2]
2(14)
1(6)
2(14)
Nonalcoholic fatty liver 2(11) disease
22.6±7.7
2(11)
EP
Diabetes mellitus
TE D
Comorbidity(%) Hypertension
2(14)
Cardiovascular disease
0
0
Others
4(22)
1(7)
Pulmonary function texts, %(mean± ±SD) (95% CI) Forced vital capacity
RI PT
Variable
AC C
522
91.7±10.4
91±14.4
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
expiratory 67.7±27.8
Forced
[53.5-82]
volume in 1 second
ejection 73.4±4.6
Ventricular
fraction,%(mean± ±SD)
[70.0-75.4]
[80.2-101.8] 68.5±33.4 [43.4-93.7] 70.5±4.5
RI PT
[86.4-97]
[67.4-72.9]
(95% CI)
[1.5-2.3]
(95% CI) Distance
vocal 7.4±0.8(6-8.5)
from
cords, cm(mean ± SD, [7.0-7.8]
TE D
range) (95% CI) ASA* status(%)
12(67)
AC C
III
EP
I II
Bronchoscopic
[1.6-2.5]
M AN U
cm(mean± ±SD, range)
2.1±0.8(1.1-3.8)
SC
Max length of lesion, 1.9±0.7(0.7-3.2)
7.9±1.5(6-10) [7.0-8.8]
3(21)
6(33)
7(50)
-
4(29)
biopsy, 8±2
7±3
times(mean± ±SD) Pathological diagnosis(%) Adenoid
cystic 5(28)
3(21)
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT carcinoma 5(28)
2(14)
2(11)
1(7)
Glomangioma
2(11)
1(7)
Others
4(22)
7(50)
Squamous-cell
Mucoepidermoid
*ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.
524
CI: confidence intervals.
525 526
530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537
EP
529
AC C
528
TE D
527
M AN U
523
SC
carcinoma
RI PT
carcinoma
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2. Operative details. SV-VATS group
Control group
(18)
(14)
Surgical duration, min, 162.5(75) median(IQR),
(95% [141.0-204.3]
260(126) [193.4-305.7]
CI)
(n=14)
end-to-end
median(IQR) (95% CI) Time
(n=12)
min, [19.3-38.4]
anastomosis,
of
[37.2-65.1]
carinal 40(14.3)
86(-)
min, (n=4)
(n=2)
TE D
reconstruction,
45(28.3)
SC
tracheal 22.5(20.4)
of
M AN U
Time
median(IQR) (95% CI)
RI PT
Variable
[28.3-53.2]
EP
Lowest SpO2 during 94.2±4.9(83-100) operation, %(mean ± [91.7-96.7]
[22.5-149.5] 93.9±4.5(85-100) [91.2-96.5]
SD, range) (95% CI)
AC C
538
Peak
EtCO2
during 47.7±4.2(41-55)
operation, mmHg(mean [45.5-49.8]
39.1±5.7(30-47) [35.6-42.5]
±SD, range) (95% CI) Conversion to tracheal 0
-
intubation Intraoperative
blood 25(30)
35(82.5)
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT loss, ml, median(IQR) [24.1-48.2]
[23.3-94.6]
(95% CI) node
sample 11(2-35)
number, median(range)
(n=11)
(n=11)
node 2
Lymph
14(2-23)
RI PT
Lymph
2
involvement (N2) of
excision, 2.5±1(1.2-4)
(95% CI) Positive
surgical 1
margins
542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549
TE D
541
EP
540
IQR: interquartile range
AC C
539
[1.8-3.5]
M AN U
cm(mean ± SD, range) [2.0-3.0]
2.6±1.5(1-4)
SC
Length
3
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3. Treatment outcomes Variable
SV-VATS
group Control
(18)
(14)
VAS 2.7±0.8
2.6±0.8
[2.4-3.2]
[2.2-3.1]
Anastomotic stenosis
1(6)
-
Anastomotic fistula
-
1(7)
Hemothorax
1(6)
Pulmonary atelectasis
-
Pneumonia
3(17)
Vocal cord paralysis
1(6)
Postoperative score* (95% CI)
M AN U
TE D
Postoperative ICU stay, 1(0-12)
EP
Postoperative
hospital 12±4 [9-14]
AC C
stay, day (95% CI) Minimal
diameter
anastomotic
of 1.8±0.2
position [1.7-1.9]
postoperatively,
-
1(7)
5(36)
2(14)
2(1-7)
13±6 [10-17] 1.6±0.4 [1.4-1.9]
cm
(95% CI) Adjuvant therapy 551
VAS: visual analogue scale.
6
SC
Complications(%)
day, (median, range)
group
RI PT
550
3
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4 . Histology and stage of the tumor (N=17)
T4N0M0
Histology
Cases SV-VATS group
Control group
Squamous carcinoma
3
2
Adenocarcinoma
1
Adenoid
cystic 5
carcinoma
carcinoma Carcinoid
555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562
Squamous carcinoma
2
1
Small cell carcinoma
-
1
EP
554
1
1
AC C
553
3
-
TE D
T4N2M0
2
-
M AN U
Mucoepidermoid
RI PT
Pathologic stage
SC
552
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 563
Table 5. Reasons for conversion to general anesthesia 1. Major bleeding, severe pleural adhesions, large tumors; 2. Severe hypoxemia, hypercapnia and acidosis;
arrhythmias and right ventricular failure;
RI PT
3. Haemodynamic instability: hypotension, cardiac index decreased, intractable
4. Persistent cough that creates difficulty or prevents performing surgery;
SC
5. Excessive movement of the diaphragm or mediastinum, causing unsafe surgery;
7. Intraoperative airways injury…
AC C
EP
TE D
564
M AN U
6. Inability to collapse the lung;
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT