Thoracoscopic surgery for tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction under spontaneous ventilation

Thoracoscopic surgery for tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction under spontaneous ventilation

Accepted Manuscript Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction under Spontaneous Ventilation Long Jiang, MD, PhD, Jun...

NAN Sizes 0 Downloads 67 Views

Accepted Manuscript Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction under Spontaneous Ventilation Long Jiang, MD, PhD, Jun Liu, MD, PhD, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, MD, Yaron Shargall, MD, Martin Kolb, MD, PhD, Wenlong Shao, MD, PhD, Qinglong Dong, MD, Lixia Liang, MD, Jianxing He, MD, PhD PII:

S0022-5223(18)30405-7

DOI:

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.153

Reference:

YMTC 12621

To appear in:

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Received Date: 20 May 2017 Revised Date:

2 November 2017

Accepted Date: 26 December 2017

Please cite this article as: Jiang L, Liu J, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Shargall Y, Kolb M, Shao W, Dong Q, Liang L, He J, Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction under Spontaneous Ventilation, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.jtcvs.2017.12.153. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Thoracoscopic Surgery for Tracheal and Carinal Resection and Reconstruction

2

under Spontaneous Ventilation

3

Long Jiang, MD, PhD1; Jun Liu, MD, PhD1; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, MD2; Yaron

5

Shargall, MD3; Martin Kolb, MD, PhD4; Wenlong Shao, MD, PhD1; Qinglong Dong,

6

MD5; Lixia Liang, MD5; Jianxing He, MD, PhD1

SC

7

1

M AN U

8 9

RI PT

4

Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical

University; Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key

11

Laboratory of Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for

12

Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.

TE D

10

13 14

2

15

Coruña, Spain.

16

AC C

EP

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Coruña University Hospital, Xubias 84, 15006.

17

3

18

Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

19

Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, McMaster University/St.

20

4

21

Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

22

Department of Medicine, Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University,

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 23

5

24

University.

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical

25

LJ and JL contributed equally to this work.

27

Written on behalf of AME Thoracic Surgery Collaborative Group.

RI PT

26

28

Conflict of interest statement and source of funding: None.

SC

29

M AN U

30

Correspondence to: Jianxing He, MD, PhD, FACS. Department of Thoracic

32

Surgery/Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University;

33

Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of

34

Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, No.

35

151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, China. Email: [email protected]

TE D

31

36

39 40 41 42 43 44

EP

38

Word count: 3047

AC C

37

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 45

Glossary of Abbreviations:

46

VATS=video

47

CT=computed tomography; PET=positron emission tomography; ASA=American

48

Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI=body mass index; BIS=bispectral index; VAS=

49

Visual Analogue Scale.

thorocoscopic

50

SV=spontaneous

ventilation;

Central Picture Legend: Specific lesions and details of tracheal resection.

SC

51

surgery;

RI PT

assisted

M AN U

52 53

Central Message: SV-VATS is a feasible procedure in airway surgery in highly

54

selected patients. It can be a valid alternative to conventional intubated VATS for

55

airway surgery.

TE D

56

Perspective statement: During conventional intubated tracheal and carinal surgery,

58

airway management includes several challenges related to tube management without

59

interfering with the surgical field and maintaining ventilation with favorable

60

oxygenation. SV-VATS technique is a feasible procedure in airway surgery.

62 63 64 65 66

AC C

61

EP

57

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Structured Abstract

68

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe and assess the techniques of

69

spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SV-VATS) for

70

tracheal/carinal resections and compare the outcomes with the conventional

71

thoracoscopic intubated method.

RI PT

67

72

Methods: From May 2015 to November 2016, some 18 consecutive patients with

74

malignant or benign diseases invading distal trachea and carina who met the criteria

75

for SV were treated by SV-VATS resection. To evaluate the feasibility of this novel

76

technique, they were compared with a control group consisting of 14 consecutive

77

patients with the same diseases who underwent VATS resection using intubated

78

general anesthesia from October 2014 to April 2015. Data were collected with a

79

median follow-up of 10.2 months 75 (range:1-27).

M AN U

TE D

80

SC

73

Results: The SV-VATS group consisted of 4 carinal resections and 14 tracheal

82

resections. In the control group, 2 patients underwent carinal resection and 12

83

underwent tracheal resection. Median operative time was shorter in the SV-VATS

84

group compared with the intubated group (162.5 min vs. 260 min), as was the median

85

time for tracheal end-to-end anastomosis (22.5 min vs. 45 min) and carinal

86

reconstruction (40 min vs. 86 min). The lowest oxygen saturation during the

87

procedure was 94.2±4.9% in SV-VATS group and 93.9±4.5% in the control group.

88

The peak CO2 level at the end of expiration was higher in the SV-VATS group

AC C

EP

81

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (47.7±4.2mmHg vs. 39.1±5.7mmHg). No conversion to tracheal intubation was

90

needed in the SV-VATS group. Postoperative complications occurred in six patients in

91

the SV-VATS group and nine in the control group. Patients who undergoing SV-VATS

92

had a trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stays (11.5±4.3d vs. 13.2±6.3d). One

93

recurrence (SV-VATS group) and two deaths (one in each group) were observed

94

during follow-up.

RI PT

89

SC

95

Conclusions: SV-VATS is a feasible procedure in tracheal and carinal resection and

97

reconstruction in highly selected patients. It can be a valid alternative to conventional

98

intubated VATS for airway surgery.

99

101 102

TE D

100

M AN U

96

Key Words: spontaneous ventilation; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; trachea;

104

carina; resection and reconstruction.

106 107 108 109 110

AC C

105

EP

103

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction

112

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been reported as feasible and safe in

113

technically demanding complex tracheal and carinal surgery[1-3]. However,

114

morbidity is not completely eliminated, with potential risks posed by conventional

115

intubation and general anesthesia. Deep anesthesia and intravenous analgesics

116

(primarily opioids) have deleterious

117

postoperative complications[4,5]. Mechanical ventilation may cause airway

118

pressure-induced injury by lung over-distension[6,7]. Endotracheal intubation can

119

also result in sore throat, mucosal ulceration and airway injury[8].

RI PT

111

associated

with

M AN U

SC

systemic side-effects

120

Spontaneous ventilation VATS(SV-VATS) has recently been extensively investigated

122

and has been reported to reduce the adverse effects of tracheal intubation and general

123

anesthesia.[9-15] It has been advocated as an alternative to conventional intubated

124

anesthesia for a variety of VATS procedures.[12,16,17] Our experience mirrored that

125

of previous studies, demonstrating that patients operated under SV-VATS had a

126

shorter post-operative recovery time, and were able to eat and mobilize earlier

127

compared with the conventional endotracheal ventilation VATS approach[18,19].

128

However, whether the SV-VATS technique can offer benefits for tracheal surgery is

129

unknown. In the present study, we have expanded the SV-VATS application to include

130

tracheal and carinal resections and reconstructions, and compared its outcomes with

131

conventional intubated methods.

132

AC C

EP

TE D

121

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 133

Material and methods

135

Between October 2014 and November 2016, clinical data for all consecutive patients

136

undergoing VATS tracheal or carinal resection and reconstruction were analyzed. The

137

patients in the control group received combined intravenous anesthesia using a

138

single-lumen 6.5mm endotracheal tube (Well Lead, Inc, Guangzhou, Guangdong,

139

China) for one-lung ventilation at the start of the procedures. Cross-field ventilation

140

was used during the tracheal and carinal procedures. During the operation, the

141

cross-field endobronchial tube can be introduced through either the operating port or

142

an additional port[1]. Patients undergoing tracheal or carinal resection using

143

conventional intubation were compared to those undergoing SV-VATS. The study was

144

approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Research

145

Ethics Committee.

SC

M AN U

TE D

146

RI PT

134

Preoperative evaluation

148

Cardiac and pulmonary functions were evaluated preoperatively using cardiac 2D

149

echo, electrocardiogram and pulmonary function tests. Routine preoperative

150

evaluation to exclude distant metastases included thoracic and abdominal contrast

151

computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET-CT) scan,

152

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, and bone scintigraphy. Any

153

ambiguities on the results were resolved by holding a multidisciplinary consultation to

154

decide whether an operation was necessary. During patient evaluation, if

AC C

EP

147

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 155

bronchoscopic evaluation revealed more than 70%-80% obstruction of the trachea, a

156

wire loop electrocautery was used to resect the majority of the tumor before tracheal

157

resection as described in a previous report[20].

RI PT

158

Indications for SV-VATS anesthesia

160

Patients eligible for SV-VATS fulfilled the following criteria: ASA grade of I-II, and a

161

body mass index (BMI) <25. Patients with a bleeding disorder, sleep apnea, evidence

162

of pleural adhesions, unfavorable airway features (such as congenital pulmonary

163

airway malformation) or spinal anatomical characteristics were not eligible for this

164

procedure. In addition, preoperative bronchoscopic examination was performed in

165

each case to confirm pathology, as well as the extent of tumor involvement evaluated

166

via multiple biopsies. In our center, we consider patients eligible for resection if they

167

have a resectable airway lesion involving no more than 4cm of the trachea. Whether

168

the SV-VATS or conventional technique was used was determined by surgeon’s

169

preference.

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

170

SC

159

171

Anesthetic and surgical management in SV-VATS procedures

172

Anesthetic Considerations

173

Details of the anesthetic procedure were described in our previous report[21]. In short,

174

anesthesia was induced with the target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (target

175

plasma concentration of 2-3ug/ml) and sufentanil 0.1-0.2 ug/kg. Muscle relaxants

176

were not used. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring was maintained at 40 to 60 during

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the operation. The spontaneous respiration rate was 12 to 20/min. During spontaneous

178

ventilation, a gradual and natural collapse of the operative lung occurred allowing

179

maximal visualization of the lungs after making the incisions. To reduce cough

180

induced by thoracoscopic manipulations, under direct thoracoscopic vision vagus

181

nerve block was performed and 2% lidocaine was sprayed on the surface of the

182

lung[22].

RI PT

177

SC

183

Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration of 1-2

185

ug/ml), dexmedetomidine 0.5-1 ug/kg/h and remifentanil 0.05 ug/kg/min. Incisions

186

were performed after local application of 1% lidocaine. Optimally, the intercostal

187

muscle and pleura were infiltrated under direct vision or palpation through the skin

188

incision. The patients’ electrocardiogram (ECG), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP),

189

pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), respiratory rate

190

(RR) and BIS were continuously monitored. During the procedure, a laryngeal mask

191

was used for oxygen inhalation, with an oxygen flow of 4-5 L/min, keeping oxygen

192

saturation above 95%. Endotracheal ventilation and cross-field ventilation were also

193

prepared as backup in case of an emergency situation, such as hypoxemia, requiring

194

peri-operative conversion of the intubation method.

TE D

EP

AC C

195

M AN U

184

196

Surgical techniques

197

Surgical preparation for all patients was identical. All patients were positioned in a

198

left lateral decubitus position. Three incisions were made: a 10-mm camera port, at

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the seventh intercostal space along the right anterior axillary line; a 4-cm main

200

operative port, located at the fourth intercostal space on the right anterolateral chest

201

wall; and a 10-mm port, at the seventh intercostal space along the right posterior

202

axillary line. We used a flexible bronchoscope through the laryngeal mask to identify

203

the proximal and distal extent of the lesion. If lung resection was needed, it was

204

performed followed by lymph node dissection.

SC

205

RI PT

199

The azygous vein was dissected and divided, if needed, using a 35-mm Endo cutter

207

(Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ). The parietal pleura was then opened from this point

208

extending toward the apex, along the lateral side of the superior vena cava. This

209

maneuver allowed the trachea and proximal bronchus to be mobilized with a

210

combination of blunt dissection and Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ).

211

Right paratracheal lymph nodes were also removed to aid with exposure and

212

mobilization of the airway if necessary. Extra attention was taken during this

213

dissection to protect the bronchial arteries and vagus nerve. The right vagus nerve was

214

identified and carefully moved to one side. We sometimes suspended it to the

215

posterior chest wall with 3-0 polypropylene (Prolene, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ). A

216

silicon sling was then placed around the trachea and each of the bronchi. Extra 3-0

217

Prolene retraction sutures were also placed in each of the airways. This technique

218

allowed retraction and exposure of the airway for further resection and reconstruction.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

206

219 220

Preoperative bronchoscopic examination was performed to confirm pathology, as well

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT as the extent of tumor involvement evaluated via multiple biopsies. According to the

222

biopsies, the resection was performed 5 to 10mm above and below the tumor margins.

223

If the lesion was malignant, we resected the trachea on the near position of tumor

224

cell-free. Two types of surgical procedures were performed in our study: tracheal

225

resection with end-to-end anastomosis and carinal resection and reconstruction with

226

two sets of anastomosis(Fig.2/3). Cervical extension was sometimes changed to a

227

lower degree to allow the trachea to move into the mediastinum before the initiation

228

of anastomosis. Anastomosis was carried out using a continuous 3-0 Prolene suture,

229

starting from the posterior cartilaginous tissue followed by the membranous section.

230

For carina reconstruction, we performed the resection of the carina first, followed by a

231

total end-to-end anastomosis between the left main bronchus and the trachea, and

232

finally anastomosis of the right main bronchus to the lateral, cartilaginous wall of the

233

trachea. After end-to-end suture of the trachea, we used additional 3-0 Prolene

234

tension-reduction suture to strengthen and protect the anastomosis. We did not use

235

muscle flaps or other tissues to protect the anastomosis. And we do not perform hilar

236

release.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

237

RI PT

221

238

Following completion of the anastomosis, we used a saline solution to test for

239

evidence of air leaks. If any air leak was observed, additional stitches were used to

240

reinforce the suture until intraoperative air leak test was confirmed negative. Only one

241

chest tube is placed at the end of the operation.(Video 1)

242

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT At the end of the surgery, a bronchoscopy was used to check the integrity of the

244

anastomosis and, if there were concerns with sputum retention, any airway secretion

245

was cleared. Upon completion of the operation, stitches between the chin and chest or

246

philadelphia cervical collars were placed to avoid excessive tension in the early

247

postoperative stage.

RI PT

243

248

Postoperative care in both groups

250

Patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) if necessary according to the

251

intraoperative and anesthesia situations in the operating room and during recovery.

252

Chest X-ray and bedside ultrasound were performed for evaluation on the same day.

253

The voice was accessed by otolaryngologists using a professional speech and voice

254

analysis

255

anti-inflammatory drugs or a fentanyl patch were used if necessary. Formal pain

256

assessment for the study was carried out on the morning of post-operative day 1 using

257

the Visual analogue scales (VAS: 0 is completely pain-free and 10 is hard to tolerate).

M AN U Index).

Painkillers,

such

as

non-steroidal

EP

TE D

Disorder

AC C

258

system(Voice

SC

249

259

Statistical Analysis

260

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median and interquartile

261

range (IQR) depend on the distribution. The 95% confidence intervals are also

262

reported. Categorical variables are given as a count and percentage of patients. Some

263

variables were not-normally distributed (surgical duration, time of tracheal end-to-end

264

anastomosis, time of carinal reconstruction, intraoperative blood loss), so median(IQR)

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 265

was summarized. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows

266

(SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

267

RI PT

268

Results

270

Between October 2014 and November 2016, a total of eighteen patients underwent

271

SV-VATS tracheal/carinal resection and reconstruction for benign or malignant

272

diseases in our center (trachea:14; carina: 4) (Group 1- SV-VATS). This group was

273

compared to a group of patients consisting of fourteen patients that underwent

274

conventionally intubated VATS procedures(trachea: 12; carina: 2) during the same

275

period of time (Group 2- control group). Age, sex, body mass index(BMI),

276

comorbidities, pulmonary and cardiac functions, lesion size, distance from vocal

277

cords, bronchoscopic biopsy patch and pathological diagnosis did not differ between

278

the two groups. However, the ASA status was different between both groups as there

279

were no grade III patients in the SV-VATS group whereas 4 patients with an ASA

280

grade III were included in the control group. (Table.1)

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

281

SC

269

282

Operative and Anesthetic Data

283

The same surgical team performed on all these airway surgery. Patients in the

284

SV-VATS group had shorter median durations of operative time (162.5 min vs. 260

285

min), tracheal end-to-end anastomosis time (22.5 min vs. 45 min) and carinal

286

reconstruction time (40 min vs. 86 min) compared with the intubated group. The two

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT groups had comparable blood loss, numbers of dissected lymph nodes and length of

288

tracheal excision. Final pathologic results showed positive surgical margins in 4

289

patients, all were confirmed adenoid cystic carcinoma (SV-VATS:1 vs. control

290

group:3). (Table.2)

RI PT

287

291

During the procedures, the mean lowest oxygen saturation was 94.2±4.9% in

293

SV-VATS group and 93.9±4.5% in the control group. The mean peak EtCO2 in the

294

SV-VATS group was higher than that in the intubated group (47.7±4.2 vs. 39.1±5.7)

295

due to mild hypercapnia under spontaneous ventilation anesthesia. No conversion to

296

tracheal intubation was needed in the SV-VATS group.

297

M AN U

SC

292

Postoperative Recovery

299

The post-operative VAS scores of both groups were similar(SV-VATS: 2.7±0.8 vs.

300

control: 2.6±0.8). The median ICU stay was one day in the SV-VATS group and 2

301

days in the intubated group. Additionally, patients who underwent SV-VATS had a

302

trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.5±4.3d vs. 13.2±6.3d).

EP

AC C

303

TE D

298

304

Postoperative complications occurred in six patients in the SV-VATS group and nine

305

in the control group (Table.3). In the SV-VATS group, anastomotic stenosis occurred

306

in one patient which was successfully managed with placement of stents. In the

307

intubated group, anastomotic fistula occurred in one patient and was repaired by

308

reoperation. There were no cases of perioperative mortality.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 309

Survival and follow-up

311

During a median follow-up time of 10.2 months, the minimal diameter of tracheal

312

anastomotic position on Chest CT six months postoperatively was comparable in both

313

groups (1.8±0.2cm vs. 1.6±0.4cm).

RI PT

310

314

For patients with malignant disease, the final results of tumor stage are shown in

316

Table 4. Six patients in the SV-VATS group and three in the intubated group received

317

adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy (Table.3). One recurrence and two deaths were

318

observed during the follow-up time. Mortality was 6.2% during follow-up.

M AN U

SC

315

319

TE D

320

Discussion

322

During conventional intubated tracheal and carinal surgery, airway management may

323

present several challenges. Most significantly is the challenge of maintaining

324

ventilation with favorable oxygenation using an endotracheal tube which can

325

sometimes interfere with the surgical field[23]. Cross-field ventilation is a universally

326

accepted strategy for conventional intubated VATS for airway surgery. However, this

327

endobronchial tube may obstruct the view of the anastomosis site and may require

328

periodical retraction during anastomosis to improve exposure. High-frequency jet

329

ventilation (HFJV) via the lumen of the blocker tube was reported to help achieve

330

one-lung ventilation without causing injury to the tumor. However, there have been

AC C

EP

321

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concerns that the use of HFJV could contribute to acute respiratory distress

332

syndrome[24]. While the SV technique is likely not possible to be performed during

333

thoracotomy, it is a valid option for VATS cases, as demonstrated both in our own

334

experience and recent literature. Since most of our practice, including airways

335

resection and reconstruction, is performed thoracoscopically, it allowed us to

336

carry-out this comparative study of conventional VATS intubation airways

337

reconstruction with SV-VATS. Our study suggests that the SV-VATS technique

338

facilitates the anesthetic and surgical procedures.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

331

339

Without the endotracheal tube the trachea is more flexible with a wider range of

341

motion during resection and anastomosis. During the spontaneous ventilation

342

anesthetic procedure, we use a laryngeal mask to protect the airway and aid the

343

intubation procedure in the event emergency intubation is required. Avoiding the use

344

of the endotracheal tube gives surgeons the advantage of an unobstructed view of the

345

surgical field. Because of this, the anastomosis and reconstruction were much faster

346

when compared with the intubated procedures, which resulted in an overall reduction

347

of the operative time.

EP

AC C

348

TE D

340

349

We demonstrated that SV-VATS was feasible without a need for conversion. Though

350

some hypercapnia was noted compared to the control group, especially during the

351

anastomosis phase; in this case, we have found that temporary suspension of operative

352

maneuvers and measures to maintain adequate hemostasis around the trachea will

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT result in the decrease of EtCO2. Our experience has also shown such hypercapnia to

354

be well tolerated without affecting the hemodynamics or surgical procedures. Of note,

355

it has previously been suggested that permissive hypercapnia may, in fact, improve

356

hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion match and provide protective effects on

357

inflammatory responses[25].

RI PT

353

358

During the course of this study, we also developed some tips and tricks regarding the

360

technique. Fire within the chest cavity is a well-documented event during airway

361

surgery[26] that poses dangers to the patient as well as to the operating theatre

362

personnel. The improved management of airway fire during airway surgery is based

363

on prevention. We reinforce coordination and communication between the anesthetic

364

and surgical teams, and systematically use suction to decrease the amount of oxygen

365

near the electrocautery. During these procedures, we used a harmonic endocutter to

366

reduce the risk of airway fire after resection of the trachea. Also at this point the

367

resulting smoke if using electrocautery could affect the oxygen supply and/or increase

368

the patients’ airway sensitivity. For patients who inhale too deeply or who have a

369

longer remaining membranous portion after initial resection of the trachea that is

370

likely to result in obstruction of the airway during inhalation, a small fine tube such as

371

nasal oxygen catheter can be placed in the distal portion of the trachea. This tube is

372

used to prevent complete closure of the distal trachea and to protect the spontaneous

373

breathing of the patient after the resection and during the beginning of anastomosis.

374

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

359

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 375

In our study, the mortality was 6.2% during the follow-up time of 10.2 months, which

376

is consistent with mortality rates of previous reports ranging from 4% to

377

12.7%[27,28]. There were four positive margins(SV-VATS:1, IVATS:3), all of which

378

were adenoid cystic carcinoma,

379

frozen section intraoperatively. This might be due to the intrinsic property of adenoid

380

cystic carcinoma, which spread most commonly by direct extension, submucosal or

381

perineural invasion, in transverse and longitudinal planes. Patients who underwent

382

SV-VATS had a trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stays. This consideration

383

is particularly important in China, where primary care at a patient´s home town is not

384

widely available. We believe our SV-VATS technique allows early discharge without

385

undue worries about patient safety after discharge home.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

though margins were confirmed tumor-free by

TE D

386

The promising outcomes of the SV-VATS may partially be the result of careful patient

388

selection, as outlined earlier in the discussion of our methods. Physical condition

389

should also be taken into consideration. None of the patients in our study received

390

neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy because no metastatic disease was found by

391

preoperative evaluation. At the current time, we do not consider neo-adjuvant

392

radio-chemotherapy in newly diagnosed N2 patients requiring carinal reconstruction

393

mainly because of its association with anastomosis-related complications and

394

operative mortality[29]. We assume that strict preoperative patient selection, good

395

preoperative preparation, and improved postoperative care might have contributed to

396

these encouraging results.

AC C

EP

387

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 397

To ensure patient safety, some clearly defined protocol for elective or urgent

399

intubation must be determined prior to the operation. We have listed some reasons for

400

conversion to general anesthesia in table 5. In addition, intubation in the lateral

401

decubitus position is a technical challenge for anesthesiologists. The anesthesiologist

402

must be skilled in placing a double-lumen tube, laryngeal mask, fibrotic

403

bronchoscopic intubation, video-assisted system management and endobronchial

404

blocker in order to securely choose the most appropriate device depending on the

405

patient’s airway, the position of the patient, time of completion of the procedure and

406

the causes that have led to conversion to general anesthesia[30]. We think continuous

407

and effective communication between surgeons and anesthesiologists is paramount.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

398

TE D

408

As this is a preliminary feasibility study some limitations should be acknowledged.

410

First, it is retrospective in nature and bias between the study arms cannot be

411

completely excluded. Second, due to the relative infrequency of such complex surgery,

412

the cohort size is small, limiting the power of analysis and conclusions. Third, the

413

selection criteria itself, specifically in regards to BMI, were designed for a Chinese

414

population. We cannot be certain that our findings are necessarily applicable for

415

populations outside China. For Western populations, for example, the BMI inclusion

416

criteria can perhaps be raised to a BMI of <30[31].

AC C

EP

409

417 418

In conclusion, in our experience, SV-VATS for tracheal and carinal resections was

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 419

feasible. The SV-VATS technique offered shorter operative times and potentially

420

faster recovery than the conventional intubated method. Further prospective research

421

is needed to confirm the validity of these results.

RI PT

422 423 424

Reference

425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456

1. Li J, Wang W, Jiang L, Yin W, Liu J, et al. (2016) Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Resection and

SC

Reconstruction of Carina and Trachea for Malignant or Benign Disease in 12 Patients: Three Centers' Experience in China. Ann Thorac Surg 102: 295-303.

2. Zhao G, Dong C, Yang M, Du X, Hu X (2014) Totally thoracoscopic tracheoplasty for a squamous cell

M AN U

carcinoma of the mediastinal trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 98: 1109-1111.

3. Jiao W, Zhu D, Cheng Z, Zhao Y (2015) Thoracoscopic tracheal resection and reconstruction for adenoid cystic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 99: e15-17.

4. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Kelley SD, Chamoun NG, Manberg PJ, et al. (2012) Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a "triple low" of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology 116: 1195-1203. 5. Hausman MS, Jr., Jewell ES, Engoren M (2015) Regional versus general anesthesia in surgical

TE D

patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does avoiding general anesthesia reduce the risk of postoperative complications? Anesth Analg 120: 1405-1412. 6. Gothard J (2006) Lung injury after thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19: 5-10.

7. Della Rocca G, Coccia C (2013) Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 26:

EP

40-46.

8. Fitzmaurice BG, Brodsky JB (1999) Airway rupture from double-lumen tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 13: 322-329.

AC C

9. Chen JS, Cheng YJ, Hung MH, Tseng YD, Chen KC, et al. (2011) Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Surg 254: 1038-1043.

10. Hung MH, Hsu HH, Chen KC, Chan KC, Cheng YJ, et al. (2013) Nonintubated thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for lung tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 96: 1209-1215.

11. Wu CY, Chen JS, Lin YS, Tsai TM, Hung MH, et al. (2013) Feasibility and safety of nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for geriatric lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg 95: 405-411.

12. Mineo TC, Pompeo E, Mineo D, Tacconi F, Marino M, et al. (2006) Awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Surg 243: 131-136. 13. Pompeo E, Mineo D, Rogliani P, Sabato AF, Mineo TC (2004) Feasibility and results of awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 78: 1761-1768. 14. Tacconi F, Pompeo E, Fabbi E, Mineo TC (2010) Awake video-assisted pleural decortication for empyema thoracis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37: 594-601. 15. Pompeo E, Tacconi F, Mineo D, Mineo TC (2007) The role of awake video-assisted thoracoscopic

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

499

surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 786-790. 16. Chen KC, Cheng YJ, Hung MH, Tseng YD, Chen JS (2012) Nonintubated thoracoscopic lung resection: a 3-year experience with 285 cases in a single institution. J Thorac Dis 4: 347-351. 17. Chen JF, Lin JB, Tu YR, Lin M, Li X, et al. (2016) Nonintubated transareolar single-port thoracic sympathicotomy with a needle scope in a series of 85 male patients. Surg Endosc 30: 3447-3453. 18. Liu J, Cui F, Li S, Chen H, Shao W, et al. (2015) Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

RI PT

under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov 22: 123-130.

19. Liu J, Cui F, Pompeo E, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Chen H, et al. (2016) The impact of non-intubated versus intubated anaesthesia on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50: 920-925.

SC

20. Shao W, Shen J, Ying W, He J (2016) Mediastinoscopic tracheal resection and reconstruction under spontaneous-breathing anesthesia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151: e105-107. 21. Guo Z, Yin W, Wang W, Zhang J, Zhang X, et al. (2016) Spontaneous ventilation anaesthesia: total

M AN U

intravenous anaesthesia with local anaesthesia or thoracic epidural anaesthesia for thoracoscopic bullectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50: 927-932.

22. Li S, Jiang L, Ang KL, Chen H, Dong Q, et al. (2016) New tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.

23. Nakanishi R, Yamashita T, Muranaka K, Shinohara K (2013) Thoracoscopic carinal resection and reconstruction in a patient with mucoepidermoid carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145: 1134-1135.

TE D

24. Porhanov VA, Poliakov IS, Selvaschuk AP, Grechishkin AI, Sitnik SD, et al. (2002) Indications and results of sleeve carinal resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22: 685-694. 25. Sinclair SE, Kregenow DA, Lamm WJ, Starr IR, Chi EY, et al. (2002) Hypercapnic acidosis is protective in an in vivo model of ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166: 403-408. 26. Bowdle TA, Glenn M, Colston H, Eisele D (1987) Fire following use of electrocautery during

EP

emergency percutaneous transtracheal ventilation. Anesthesiology 66: 697-698. 27. Lanuti M, Mathisen DJ (2004) Carinal resection. Thorac Surg Clin 14: 199-209. 28. Block MI, Khitin LM, Sade RM (2006) Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Ann Thorac Surg 82: 6-11; discussion 11-12.

AC C

457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498

29. de Perrot M, Fadel E, Mercier O, Mussot S, Chapelier A, et al. (2006) Long-term results after carinal resection for carcinoma: does the benefit warrant the risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131: 81-89.

30. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Bonome C, Fieira E, Aymerich H, Fernandez R, et al. (2016) Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections: the future of thoracic surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49: 721-731. 31. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Aymerich H, Bonome C, Fieira E (2015) From Open Operations to Nonintubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Minimizing the Trauma to the Patient. Ann Thorac Surg 100: 2003-2005.

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure legends

501

Figure 1. Specific lesions and details of tracheal and carinal resection and

502

reconstruction. a,c. chest reconstructed computed tomography. b,d. surgical resection

503

plan.

RI PT

500

504

Figure 2. Key techniques in tracheal resection and reconstruction. a. determine the

506

tumor margins under bronchoscopic view; b. mobilize the trachea and resect the

507

tumor; c. end-to-end anastomosis of the trachea starting from the distal corner of the

508

posterior tracheal wall; d. End-to-end anastomosis being completed.

M AN U

SC

505

509

Figure 3. Key techniques in carinal resection and reconstruction. a. mobilize the

511

trachea and bronchus, and resect the tumor; b. end-to-end anastomosis of the distal

512

trachea and the left main bronchus starting from the posterior tracheal wall; c. right

513

main bronchus being implanted into the aperture; d. carinal reconstruction being

514

completed.

EP

AC C

515

TE D

510

516

Video legend: The surgical procedure of SV-VATS carina resection and

517

reconstruction.

518 519 520 521

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients. SV-VATS events

Control events

n=18

n=14

Age, y(median, range)

49(16-59)

36(16-74)

(95% CI)

[36-51]

[30-52]

Male

10(56)

10(71)

Female

8(44)

4(29)

mass

M AN U

Body

SC

Sex(%)

index, 21.7±2.1

kg/m2(mean± ±SD)

[20.6-22.8]

(95% CI)

[18-27.2]

2(14)

1(6)

2(14)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver 2(11) disease

22.6±7.7

2(11)

EP

Diabetes mellitus

TE D

Comorbidity(%) Hypertension

2(14)

Cardiovascular disease

0

0

Others

4(22)

1(7)

Pulmonary function texts, %(mean± ±SD) (95% CI) Forced vital capacity

RI PT

Variable

AC C

522

91.7±10.4

91±14.4

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

expiratory 67.7±27.8

Forced

[53.5-82]

volume in 1 second

ejection 73.4±4.6

Ventricular

fraction,%(mean± ±SD)

[70.0-75.4]

[80.2-101.8] 68.5±33.4 [43.4-93.7] 70.5±4.5

RI PT

[86.4-97]

[67.4-72.9]

(95% CI)

[1.5-2.3]

(95% CI) Distance

vocal 7.4±0.8(6-8.5)

from

cords, cm(mean ± SD, [7.0-7.8]

TE D

range) (95% CI) ASA* status(%)

12(67)

AC C

III

EP

I II

Bronchoscopic

[1.6-2.5]

M AN U

cm(mean± ±SD, range)

2.1±0.8(1.1-3.8)

SC

Max length of lesion, 1.9±0.7(0.7-3.2)

7.9±1.5(6-10) [7.0-8.8]

3(21)

6(33)

7(50)

-

4(29)

biopsy, 8±2

7±3

times(mean± ±SD) Pathological diagnosis(%) Adenoid

cystic 5(28)

3(21)

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT carcinoma 5(28)

2(14)

2(11)

1(7)

Glomangioma

2(11)

1(7)

Others

4(22)

7(50)

Squamous-cell

Mucoepidermoid

*ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.

524

CI: confidence intervals.

525 526

530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537

EP

529

AC C

528

TE D

527

M AN U

523

SC

carcinoma

RI PT

carcinoma

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2. Operative details. SV-VATS group

Control group

(18)

(14)

Surgical duration, min, 162.5(75) median(IQR),

(95% [141.0-204.3]

260(126) [193.4-305.7]

CI)

(n=14)

end-to-end

median(IQR) (95% CI) Time

(n=12)

min, [19.3-38.4]

anastomosis,

of

[37.2-65.1]

carinal 40(14.3)

86(-)

min, (n=4)

(n=2)

TE D

reconstruction,

45(28.3)

SC

tracheal 22.5(20.4)

of

M AN U

Time

median(IQR) (95% CI)

RI PT

Variable

[28.3-53.2]

EP

Lowest SpO2 during 94.2±4.9(83-100) operation, %(mean ± [91.7-96.7]

[22.5-149.5] 93.9±4.5(85-100) [91.2-96.5]

SD, range) (95% CI)

AC C

538

Peak

EtCO2

during 47.7±4.2(41-55)

operation, mmHg(mean [45.5-49.8]

39.1±5.7(30-47) [35.6-42.5]

±SD, range) (95% CI) Conversion to tracheal 0

-

intubation Intraoperative

blood 25(30)

35(82.5)

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT loss, ml, median(IQR) [24.1-48.2]

[23.3-94.6]

(95% CI) node

sample 11(2-35)

number, median(range)

(n=11)

(n=11)

node 2

Lymph

14(2-23)

RI PT

Lymph

2

involvement (N2) of

excision, 2.5±1(1.2-4)

(95% CI) Positive

surgical 1

margins

542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549

TE D

541

EP

540

IQR: interquartile range

AC C

539

[1.8-3.5]

M AN U

cm(mean ± SD, range) [2.0-3.0]

2.6±1.5(1-4)

SC

Length

3

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3. Treatment outcomes Variable

SV-VATS

group Control

(18)

(14)

VAS 2.7±0.8

2.6±0.8

[2.4-3.2]

[2.2-3.1]

Anastomotic stenosis

1(6)

-

Anastomotic fistula

-

1(7)

Hemothorax

1(6)

Pulmonary atelectasis

-

Pneumonia

3(17)

Vocal cord paralysis

1(6)

Postoperative score* (95% CI)

M AN U

TE D

Postoperative ICU stay, 1(0-12)

EP

Postoperative

hospital 12±4 [9-14]

AC C

stay, day (95% CI) Minimal

diameter

anastomotic

of 1.8±0.2

position [1.7-1.9]

postoperatively,

-

1(7)

5(36)

2(14)

2(1-7)

13±6 [10-17] 1.6±0.4 [1.4-1.9]

cm

(95% CI) Adjuvant therapy 551

VAS: visual analogue scale.

6

SC

Complications(%)

day, (median, range)

group

RI PT

550

3

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4 . Histology and stage of the tumor (N=17)

T4N0M0

Histology

Cases SV-VATS group

Control group

Squamous carcinoma

3

2

Adenocarcinoma

1

Adenoid

cystic 5

carcinoma

carcinoma Carcinoid

555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562

Squamous carcinoma

2

1

Small cell carcinoma

-

1

EP

554

1

1

AC C

553

3

-

TE D

T4N2M0

2

-

M AN U

Mucoepidermoid

RI PT

Pathologic stage

SC

552

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 563

Table 5. Reasons for conversion to general anesthesia 1. Major bleeding, severe pleural adhesions, large tumors; 2. Severe hypoxemia, hypercapnia and acidosis;

arrhythmias and right ventricular failure;

RI PT

3. Haemodynamic instability: hypotension, cardiac index decreased, intractable

4. Persistent cough that creates difficulty or prevents performing surgery;

SC

5. Excessive movement of the diaphragm or mediastinum, causing unsafe surgery;

7. Intraoperative airways injury…

AC C

EP

TE D

564

M AN U

6. Inability to collapse the lung;

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT