Who decides when to hack the planet?

Who decides when to hack the planet?

THIS WEEK Hacking the planet: who decides? SHRUTI SHRESTHA/REUTERS And if we’re even thinking about artificially cooling Earth, science needs to te...

419KB Sizes 0 Downloads 240 Views

THIS WEEK

Hacking the planet: who decides?

SHRUTI SHRESTHA/REUTERS

And if we’re even thinking about artificially cooling Earth, science needs to test the proposals pronto

prjjfqfk@lmbke^dbk) Abkj^oh)^kaqebobibkqibpp MI>KP^obq^hfkdpe^mbcloqeb ofpbfkdil_^i@L/bjfppflkpe^sb a^vtebk^dil_^i`l^ifqflkj^v mbopr^abaj^kvqlobir`q^kqiv e^sbqlÎe^`hqebmi^kbqÏfk^ `lkpfabodblbkdfkbbofkd _faqlobsbopbqebo^s^dbplc plirqflkp%pbbaf^do^j)c^oofdeq&+ dil_^it^ojfkd+ Cbt^odrb^d^fkpqÎ^oqfcf`f^i Molmlp^ipql`lliqebB^oqe_v qobbpÏqe^q`lriapr`h@L/afob`qiv coljqeb^qjlpmebob%pbb abmilvfkdprkpe^abplopr`hfkd Î>oqfcf`f^iqobbplkqebt^vÏ) `^o_lkaflufabcoljqeb ofdeq&+?rqjlob`lkqolsbopf^i ^qjlpmebobtbob`lkpfaboba molmlp^ipÌql_lrk`bpli^o c^k`fcrigrpq^cbtvb^op^dl)_rq bkbodv_^`hlrqfkqlpm^`b)clo ^obklt_bfkd`lkpfaboba_v fkpq^k`bÌpmifqqeb`lkcbobk`b) mlifqf`f^kpfkqebRP^kaRH+>q tfqemlif`vbumboqpt^okfkd ^d^qebofkdlchbvp`fbkqfpqp^ka `ifj^qbp`fbkqfpqpqe^qqebob mlif`vbumboqpebiafk>pfilj^o) tlria_b^mr_if`_^`hi^pe+ @^ifclokf^)i^pqtbbh)abq^fiba LifsboTfkdbkqbo^qqebKbt ab_^qbp_bd^klsbotelpelria Jbuf`lFkpqfqrqblcJfkfkd^ka `lkqoliqebabsbilmjbkqlc^ Qb`eklildvfkPl`loolmobpbkqba mi^kbq^ovobp`rbmi^k+ abq^fiplc^k^j_fqflrpmi^kql Qebpbkpb^qqebjbbqfkdt^p qe^qao^pqf`bjfppflkp`rqp^obqeb pefcqtbpqboivtfkap+Qbjmbo^qrob _bpqt^vqlifjfqqeb`^q^pqolmef` ^kamobpprob`e^kdbplsboqeb PlrqebokL`b^k^obqelrdeqql aolrdeqp^kapb^*ibsbiofpbpqe^q e^sbmrpebaqebpbtbpqboifbp dil_^it^ojfkdfpbumb`qbaql `^rpb+?rqqebc^firoblcAb`bj_boÑp 0ql1abdobbpplrqelsboqebi^pq Jim Giles, Asilomar, California

6 | NewScientist | 3 April 2010

2-vb^op+Qefppefcqpqobkdqebkp qebl`b^k`roobkqpqe^q_ofkd t^oj)p^iqvt^qboqlqebproc^`b) tebobfq^``bibo^qbpqebjbiqfkd lc>kq^o`qf`f`b+ Tfkdbkqbomolmlpbppbbafkd qebPlrqebokL`b^ktfqem^oqf`ibp lcfolkql_llpqmevqlmi^khqlk doltqe+Mi^khqlkobib^pb^ `ebjf`^i`^iibaafjbqeviprimefab fkqlqeb^qjlpmebobtef`eebimp

bccb`qp)eltbsbo+@llifkd^pj^ii obdflk_v-+2÷@`lriaao^j^qf`^iiv `e^kdbo^fkm^qqbokp+Qebfjm^`q lcmi^khqlk_illjplkl`b^kifcb fp^iplmlloivrkabopqlla+ @ljmrqbojlabip`^kdlpljb t^vqlcfiifkdfkqebpb_i^khp)^ka Tfkdbkqboclobpbbp^qib^pq.-vb^op lc`ljmrqbopqrafbp_bclobcfbia qbpqp`lriahf`hlcc+Lqeboplirqflkp `lria_bcfbia*qbpqbapllkbo) o^fpfkdqebabif`^qbnrbpqflklc “The failure of climate tebqebopr`ebumbofjbkqppelria talks has persuaded many _b^iiltbafkqebcfopqmi^`b)^ka to reluctantly consider te^qclojpqebv`lriaq^hb+ geoengineering solutions” Jlabiifkde^p^iob^avpeltk qe^qpqo^qlpmebof``ilraplc `ilraaolmibqpcloj+Jlobaolmibqp prime^qbm^oqf`ibp`lriao^mfaiv jb^ktefqbo`ilrapqe^q_lrk`b `lliqebmi^kbq+A^sfaHbfqelc jlobpli^obkbodv^t^vcolj qebRkfsbopfqvlc@^id^ov)@^k^a^) B^oqe+Tfkdbkqbo`^i`ri^qbpqe^qfq e^ppr_jfqqba^m^mboqlK^qrob tlria_bmlppf_ibql`lliobdflk^i fktef`eeblrqifkbp^molmlp^iql qbjmbo^qrobp_v-+2÷@)tef`e obib^pb^_lrq^qlkkblcprime^qb `lriamrpeqebtbpqboifbp_^`h m^oqf`ibpcolj^K>P>mi^kb^q qlt^oapqebfolofdfk^imlpfqflk+ ^k^iqfqrablc/-hfiljbqobp+Qeb Ifqqibfphkltk^_lrqqebpfab obpriqptlriaebimobpb^o`ebop

In this section N Why Greenland is warming, not melting, page 8 NBrain damage skews our moral compass, page 10 NCounting swine flu’s dead, page 11

Options for cooling the planet There is a huge range of geoengineering proposals on the table, each with its own risks, costs and potential effectiveness

HIGH

HIGH EFFECTIVENESS LOW COST

Space-based reflectors

CO2 capture from air (artificial trees)

It might, however, turn out to be a lot cheaper than that. In October 2009, David Keith, a climate and energy researcher, founded Carbon Engineering in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The firm aims to build a device to capture CO2 at economically viable prices. He claims his device will draw down a tonne for US$100 to $250. He did not release details of the device at the Asilomar conference,

EFFECTIVENESS

Forestation

Land-based reflectors (desert) Ocean fertilisation

RISK

LOW EFFECTIVENESS HIGH COST

LOW

HIGH

HIGH LOW

COST

`lriae^sb^dil_^ifjm^`q)qebv `lrialkiv_babmilvba^cqbodil_^i q^ihp)iba_vqebRkfqbaK^qflkp) clofkpq^k`b+Q^ihptlriae^sb qlfk`irabmi^kpql`ljmbkp^qb mblmibtelpbifsbifellap`lria _ba^j^dba_vpfabbccb`qp+Lqebop ^odrbaqe^qdil_^ikbdlqf^qflkp `lria_b`ljbfjmlppf_ibql j^k^db)^ka`fqbaRK*iba`ifj^qb q^ihp^p^kbu^jmiblcelt^ii* fk`irpfsbbccloqp`^kc^fiqlplisb mol_ibjpobnrfofkdab`fpfsb^`qflk+ Of`e^oa?bkbaf`h)mobpfabkqlc qebRPK^qflk^i@lrk`ficloP`fbk`b ^kaqebBksfolkjbkq^ka^clojbo RPdlsbokjbkqkbdlqf^qlo) `fo`ri^qba^al`rjbkqfktef`e eb^odrbaqe^qqebmofk`fmibp

but said that it involves scaling up existing processes for capturing CO2, which involve passing the gas over a substance such as sodium hydroxide. The gas combines with the chemical and can then be removed and stored underground. Keith says Bill Gates has invested in Carbon Engineering, which plans to spend $3 million over the next five years building a prototype device.

SOURCE: ROYAL SOCIETY

Land-based reflectors (urban)

ARTIFICIAL TREES ON THE WAY There is one geoengineering solution that almost everyone would like to see work. If carbon dioxide can be removed from the air and stored safely underground, we might be able to stave off the worse effects of climate change. The big problem is that sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere is expensive: many estimates put the cost at close to $1000 for each tonne captured.

Stratospheric sunshade

Cloud seeding

LOW

lc_l^qpcfobm^oqf`ibplcpb^*p^iq fkqlqeb^qjlpmebob)tebobqebv tlriatefqbk`ilrap+ Qebdolrmfppbbhfkdcrkapclo mfilqobpb^o`efkslisfkd.-pefmp ^ka.-)---pnr^obhfiljbqobplc l`b^k+HbiivT^kpbop^vpfq`lria q^hbmi^`bfkqeobbqlclrovb^op+ Qefppqravtlriaklqrpbbklrde m^oqf`ibpql`ob^qb^klqf`b^_ib `llifkdbccb`q+J^kv`ifj^qb p`fbkqfpqpfk>pfilj^oqelrdeq obdri^qflkpqe^qdlsboklqebo l`b^kldo^mef`bumbofjbkqp tlriamol_^_ivmolsfabprccf`fbkq lsbopfdeqlcqefpmolgb`q+T^kpbo ^ipl^odrbabuqo^obdri^qflk tlria`ob^qbmlqbkqf^iiva^kdbolrp abi^vp)^pdlsbokjbkqpjfdeq i^qbo_bclo`baqlabmilv^ qb`eklildvqe^qe^aklq _bbkmolmboivqbpqba+ Qe^qsfbtpmifqabibd^qbp^q >pfilj^o+Pl`f^ip`fbkqfpqp^ka mlif`vbumboqpqllhfpprbtfqe qebsfbtqe^qqof^ipafaklqkbba croqebolsbopfdeq+Qebvt^okba lc^mlmri^o_^`hi^perkibpp tlria*_bdblbkdfkbbop`lkpriq tfqeqebmr_if`_bcloborkkfkd pr`epqrafbp+Grpqorkkfkdqbpqp –Everyone has a stake in this– pbkap^pfdk^iqe^qp`fbkqfpqp ^obfkqbobpqbafk^crqrobclo obcfkbqebfojlabip)^kaqeb dblbkdfkbbofkd)p^vpPel_fq^ krj_bolcm^oqf`ibpobib^pba M^oqe^p^o^qev^qqebRkfsbopfqv tlria_bc^opeloqlcqebkrj_bo lcJf`efd^k)>kk>o_lo+ÎQeb obnrfobaqlmolar`b^pfdkfcf`^kq fkqbkqflkfpqlbum^kaqebmol`bpp+ `llifkdbccb`q+ Qebm^qetfiie^sb_bbkpbq+Ï PfisboIfkfkd)^klk*molcfq Fcbumbofjbkqpmoldobppql^ lod^kfp^qflkclrkaba_vHbiiv i^odbop`^ib)^pb`lkamol_ibj T^kpbo)^kbkqobmobkbro_^pbafk ^ofpbp7tef`ek^qflkppelria P^kCo^k`fp`l)@^ifclokf^)e^p^ ab`fabtebqebo^molmlp^ie^p qb^jlc02p`fbkqfpqptlohfkdlk^ molsbap^cbbklrdeqlfjmibjbkq< `llifkdmol`bppfktef`e^cilqfii^ Jlpq^dobbaqe^q^ppljbplirqflkp

dlsbokfkddblbkdfkbbofkd obpb^o`epelria_babsbilmba_v ^dolrmlc.1k^qflkp)fk`irafkd qebRP)pbsbo^iBrolmb^kk^qflkp) Fkaf^^ka@efk^+Efpmolmlp^i d^okbobapljbfkqbobpq)_rq^q ib^pqlkbmboplkKbtP`fbkqfpq pmlhbqlt^pafp^mmolsfkd+ ÎF`^kklqfj^dfkb^cbt`lrkqofbp j^hfkd^ab`fpflkclobsbov_lav)Ï p^vpM^_ilPr^obw)telpqrafbp `ifj^qb^kaerj^kfq^of^k afp^pqbop^q?lpqlkRkfsbopfqv+ ÎM^oqf`fm^qflkfpafccf`riq)_rqqe^q fpklq^kbu`rpbcloklqalfkdfq+Ï >i^`hlc`lkpriq^qflk`lriacrbi `^jm^fdkp^d^fkpqdblbkdfkbbofkd pfjfi^oqlqelpbqe^qe^sbabo^fiba qebrpblcdbkbqf`^iivjlafcfba `olmpfkBrolmb)M^oqe^p^o^qev t^okp+Pr`emolqbpqppbbjql_b q^hfkdlcc^iob^av+Tefibabibd^qbp tbobq^ihfkdfk>pfilj^o)^_lav lclsbo4-bksfolkjbkq^i)eb^iqe ^kapl`f^idolrmpmr_ifpeba^k lmbkibqqbo^qq^`hfkdqebjbbqfkd+ ÎPr`e^afp`rppflk`^kklqe^mmbk tfqelrqqebm^oqf`fm^qflklcqeb criijbj_bopefmlcqebRkfqba K^qflkp)Ïfqob^ap+ÎAbqbojfkfkd drfabifkbpclodblbkdfkbbofkd obpb^o`e^kaqbpqfkdfkqeb ^_pbk`blcqe^qab_^qbfp mobj^qrob^kafoobpmlkpf_ib+ÏN 3 April 2010 | NewScientist | 7