Robot-assisted surgery: Applications in urology Eur Urol Suppl 2014;13;e1126
Print! Print!
Lin C-Y., Ou Y-C., Yang C-K., Chiu K-Y., Wang S-S., Su C-K., Ho H-C., Cheng C-L., Chen C-S., Li J-R., Chen W-M. Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Dept. of Surgery, Div. Urology, Taichung, Taiwan INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: The da Vinci robot system has became the main fashion of minimal invasive surgery and has been used in numerous complex reconstructive procedures. Beginning from the robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 2005, we tried to expand our practical model and application of da Vinci robot system into other urologic surgeries. MATERIAL & METHODS: Since Dec 2005, we established a urologic robotic team and adopted conventional 4-arm da Vinci robotic system. (Intuitive surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) We performed a retrospective study about the application and of robotic urologic surgery in a single institute. There were total 683 cases with 14 procedures from Dec 2005 to Dec 2012. Surgeries were performed by 9 operators, but one of them performed 582 cases. RESULTS: Total 683 cases of robotic urologic surgeries were divided into three time intervals. We performed the first robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Dec 2005, and then we started other kinds of procedure.(Table 1).
total number
performed by single surgeon
2005 2008
2009 2010
2011 2012
683
582
159
195
329
Radical prostatectomy
586
500
136
170
280
Partial nephrectomy
27
21
8
8
11
bil LN dissection
14
9
6
4
4
Dismembered pyeloplasty
9
7
3
1
5
Heminephrectomy
1
1
0
0
1
Nephroureterectomy and Radical cystectomy
6
6
3
2
1
Nephroureterectomy and Radical cystectoprostatectomy
3
3
0
3
0
Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision
11
11
0
4
7
Partial cystectomy
2
1
0
0
2
Radical cystoprostatectomy or cystectomy with ileal conduit
5
4
0
0
5
Ureteral reconstruction
1
1
1
0
0
Pyelolithotomy/ ureterolithotomy
2
2
1
0
1
Nephropexy
2
2
0
0
2
Simple prostatectomy
12
12
1
3
8
We also analyzed the operation time, blood loss and transfusion rate of the major operation and the procedure with larger number size.The initial outcomes of different robotic procedures are represented in Table 2.
Procedure
case number
operation time (range)
blood loss (range)
transfusion rate
conversion
Radical prostatectomy
586
144
137±165
2%
10/586
Partial nephrectomy
27
258
430
11%
3/21
bil LN dissection
14
90 (70 -120)
35(20-200)
0
0
Dismembered pyeloplasty
9
138 (80 - 270)
<10
0
0
Nephroureterectomy and radical cystectomy/cystectoprostatectomy
9
295 (210 - 390)
470 (270 - 850)
33%
0
Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision
11
129 (110 - 150)
63.3 (20 - 100)
0
0
Partial cystectomy
2
150
50
0
0
Radical cystoprostatectomy or cystectomy with ileal conduit
5
230 (230 - 320)
310 (100 - 700)
20%
0
Simple prostatectomy
12
150 (130 - 180)
208.3 (50 - 850)
8%
0
10 cases of radical prostatectomy and 3 cases of partial nephrectomy were reported of conversion.
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) Case number Reason
Result
3
da Vinci surgical system malfunction
laparoscopy
1
L't external iliac vein injury
Convert to laparotomy
1
Software incompatibility before operation Reschedule (delayed 6 hours)
2
Severe adhesion
Laparotomy
1
Urethral injury
Minimal laparotomy
1
Bleeding
Minimal laparotomy
1
da Vinci surgical system malfunction
3 arm system with laparoscopic assistance
Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) Case number Reason
Result
2
Tumour margin involvement
robotic assisted radical nephrectomy
1
Renal vein injury
Laparotomy radical nephrectomy
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, robotic system can be applied to many kinds of urologic surgeries both safely and efficiently.