Vol. 14, No. 2, 1964
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
3-g-CAFFEOYLSHIKIMIC ITS
ISOMERS,
A NEW V. P.
October
22,
CLASS
Maier,
Fruit
Received
ACID
chromatographic
dactylifera)
studies
acid
browning
(Maier
substrates
acid
and purified
by column
zation
from
water
calcd.
for
browning
SUBSTRATES’ Huber
1963).
We have
of a crystalline extracted
structures
Hanson
and Zucker,
in dates which
estdblished
(Phoenix
we named
its
and synthesis.
enzymic
structure
This
with
methanol on silicic
a] kt124O
345,
calcd.
acid. fresh
green
After
recrystalli-
C 57.50.
H 4.80%,
acid.
(decomp.);
H 4.790/0;[ equivalent
from
to be
is the first
hydroxycinnamoylshikimic
m. p. 224-225”
and neutral
but their
It is one of the main
now
chromatography
C 57.16,
of several
compound,
‘by degradation
was
1961;
evidence
substrates
crystalline
and Metzler,
it gave
C16H1608:
ethanol)
a new
acid
and synthesis Dactylifric
aqueous
F.
reported,
and Hergert,
on enzymic
in dates.
3-c-caffeoylshikimic isolation
has been
(Goldschmid
we isolated
dactylifric
and A.
and UV spectral
acids
not elucidated During
Metzler
BROWNING
AND
U. S. Department of Agriculture and Vegetable Chemistry Laboratory’ 263 S. Chester Avenue Pasadena, California
hydroxycinnamoylshikimic
1963).
M.
ACID)
1963
Previously,
were
(DACTYLIFRIC
OF ENZYMIC
D.
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(c=l.
dates
16 in 62.5%
336.
‘Presented in part at the 144th American Chemical Society Meeting, Los California, April, 1963; work supported in part by Date Administrative Committee, Indio, California. LA laboratory of the Western Agricultural Research
Utilization Service.
Research
124
and Development
Angeles
Division,
Vol. 14, No. 2, 1964 The EtOH
X
UV spectra
max hmax
moiety
in which
349,
1956;
anthocyanase acid
shikimic
acids
was
various
t NaOAc
A max
spectra
group
obtained
identified
reactions.
Caffeic
acid
was
with
silicic
also
acid
confirmed
mu ; EtOH
the car’boxyl compound
acid
group
is
with
and shikimic
authentic
t NaOAc
of a caffeic
acids.
and base hydrolysis.
by comparison
and electrophoresis,
as follows:
the presence
caffeic
acid
were
~304
of the
yielded
on both
331,
whereas
hydrolysis
1962)
reagents
show
is free
Enzymic
et al.,
also
with
These
1957).
were
chromatography
Caffeic
samples
using
chromatostrips,
and
by UV and JR spectra
and paper
color
and mixed
point. Hydrogenation
10% Pd-C
of 5 mg of dactylifric
catalyst
a molecular
The
EtOH
mu.
B (Corner
Shikimic
1.01
mu;
-306
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
compound
the o-dihydroxy
(Jurd,
melting
of the
-303
332’
H3B03
‘blocked
BIOCHEMICAL
in me,thanol
weight
moles/mole hydrogen
hydrogen caffeic
Under
as expected
and
of shikimic
data
Treatment acetone amorphous etograms
acids establish
for
white the
solid
acid.
essentially
identical
Since
caffeic
Thus,
acid
gave
a single
On paper
acid
with
derivative
treatment
125
the sum
of of
had a different
the caffeic of shikimic
HCl
acid. in dry
gave
an
and electrophor-
of the isopropylidene acid
moles/mole
moles/mole.
chromatograms
spot which
of dactylifric Similar
for
to be due
is a monocaffeoylshikimic
of dactylifric
the UV spectrum
absor’bed
moles/mole.
the 2.33
of an isopropylidene yield.
(assuming
appears
that found
2.40
mole acid
1.39
of one mole
with
i. e.,
per
absor’bed
group.
milligrams
in high
to that
unchanged.
acid
dactylifric
the formation
compound
dactylifric
was
that
conditions,
agrees
of 10 mg of
of hydrogen
in excess
separately,
of several
to test
shikimic
acid
in the presence
moles
the same
hydroxyl
up by dactylifric
and shikimic
2.33
acid
of the allylic
taken
These
molecule
of 336).
uptake
to hydrogenolysis
used
acid
Rf
value
derivative acid
portion
acid
is known
than was
of the to yield
t
Vol. 14, No. 2, 1964 only
4, 5-g-isopropylidene
the 3-hydroxyl acid
BiOCHEMlCAL shikimic
is trans.
yielded
caffeic
comparison
hydrolysis
with
derivative
shows
acid
dactylifric
(Fischer
1937),
of isopropylidene
samples.
shikimic
acid,
The
acid
is 3-O-caffeoylshikimic
since
dactylifric
shikimic
authentic of the
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
and Dangschat,
and 4,5-0-isopropylidene
4, 5-(J-isopropylidene that
acid
Enzymic
acid
chromatographic
AND BIOPHYSKAL
as
formation
portion
identified
by
of a
of dactylifric
acid
acid:
O* ,C-CH=CH 0
Dactylifric
The
structure
Acid,
of dactylifric
acid
Diphenylmethylenedioxycaffeoyl shikimic with
acetic
acid
and mixed chloride
acid
melting with
methyl
the isopropylidene caffeoyl) phoretically
shikimate. identical
- HCl
yielded
purification.
point.
In addition,
with
aqueous
This
compound
with
dactylifric
of the ‘blocking
was
electrophoresis, condensation
acetic was acid
4,5-z-isopropylidene
3-z-caffeoylshikimic
compound
(4,5-g-isopropylidene) group
with
Hydrolysis
crystalline
by chromatography,
‘by synthesis.
condensed
1937).
This
Acid
confirmed
was
and Dangschat,
chromatographic dactylifric
was
chloride
(Fischer
aqueous
after with
acid
3-0-Caffeoylshikimic
shown
acid to .be identical
UV and IR spectra of 3,4-dimethoxycinnamoyl
shikimate
followed
acid
methyl
gave
chromatographically methylated
groups
with
by hydrolysis 3-i-(di-z-methyland electro-
diazomethane.
of
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 14, No. 2, 1964 A second than
crystalline
dactylifric
acid
on hydrolysis,
band
These
has an R
compounds
components,
(Metzenberg
acid
concluded
and ,that neodactylifric When
sprayed
paper
with
brown
colors
Each These
shikimic
establish isolation
acid cinnamic
substituted plants 4 Ratio
the date
now
cinnamic
acid
they may
of effluent
extract
volume
based esters
gave
a negative
of the
and its
or with
isomers
mushroom
in acetate
pH
‘buffer,
at room
temperature.
enzymic
‘browning
of a crystalline of a new
acid.
to that
group
‘be difficult
of caffeic
were 5. 1,
substrates. caffeoyl-
It is possible will
are tyrosinase
acids
acid
test.
acid.
to any appreciable
127
a positive
and isodactylifric
as new
compound
gave
test
is 4-CJ-caffeoylshikimic
acid
the existence
not accumulate
periodate
acid acid
10 minutes
of shikimic
and the names
and the
of dates
on shikimic
acid
and 0. 1N
hydroxyls
determination
establishes
acid
identical
of the phenolic
dactylifric
acids
respectively.
and minor
Dactylifric
after
a major
the major
and tyrosinase
and structural
esters
‘because
case.
1963)
for
neodactylifric
extract
the material
UV spectra
in 10% acetic
suggested
acid
of pure
the dactylifric
acid
are
whereas
have
acids
a neutral
and 2. 12,
is 5-O- caffeoylshikimic
color
firmly
acid,
(Hanson,
bands
slowly
and shikimic
of dactylifric
methylation
enzyme
in every
a yellow-‘brown
tests The
tuted
with
gave
a crude
develop
treated
isomers
more
When
of 2.38
Both
acid
chromatograms
either
caffeic
column
that isodactylifric
acid
column
of hydrogen/mole.
isodactylifric 1954)
the
dactylifric
Rf values
therefore
After
it is tentatively
with
of 1.83.
and neodactylifric
and Mitchell,
only
partitioning
and similar
are
diazomethane
It yields
R caf4 values
value
caf
respectively. with
with
acid
from
identical
acid
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
elutes
2. 26 moles
o’bserved
acid
car.boxyl
which
isolated.
silicic
of dactylifric
isodactylifric
also
are
acid
that
Thus,
also
on an analytical
Dactylifric
HCl.
was
of 341 and absor’bs
and minor
with
material
has a UV spectrum
equivalent is tested
AND BIOPHYSICAL
extent acid.
of substithat
the
to detect
in
due to high
BtOCHEMlCAL
Vol. 14, No. 2, 1964 metabolic
activity.
aromatic
compounds
acids,
flavonoids,
Whether
The such
with
of the
RESEARCH COMMUNtCATIONS
of shikimic
in the ‘biosynthesis
as tyrosine,
coumarins
compounds
or associated
importance
AND BIOPHYSICAL
phenylalanine,
and liguin
(Brown,
caffeoylshikimic
any of these
acid
acid
biosynthetic
the substituted 1961)
type
pathways
suggests are
remains
cinnamic
this
directly
of
possibility.
involved
in
to be determined.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would their
many
helpful
like
to thank
Drs.
Ro’bert
M.
Horowitz
and David
L.
Dreyer
for
suggestions. REFERENCES
Brown, Corner,
S. A. Science 134, 305 (1961). J. J., Har’bouG, J. B. s Humphries, S. G., and GU.is, W. D. Phytochem. i, 73 (1962). Fischer, H. 0. L. and Dangs chat, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 20, 705 (1937). Goldschmid, 0. and Hergert, H. L. Tappi 44, 858 (1961)F Hanson, R. H. and Zucker, M. J. Biol. Chem. 238, 1105 (1963). Jurd, L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 63, 376 (195K Jurd, L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 6X 284 (1957), Maier, V. P. and Metzler, D. M. Amer. Chem. Sot. Abet. 144th Meeting, IC (1963). Metzenberg, R. L. and Mitchell, H. K. J. Amer. Chem. Sot. -76, 4187 (1954).
128