3D analysis of macrosegregation in twin-roll cast AA3003 alloy ˇ akov´a, Mariia Zimina, Stefan Zaunschirm, Johann KastMichaela Slap´ ner, Jan Bajer, Miroslav Cieslar PII: DOI: Reference:
S1044-5803(16)30125-5 doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.023 MTL 8240
To appear in:
Materials Characterization
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
9 November 2015 31 March 2016 29 April 2016
ˇ akov´ Please cite this article as: Slap´ a Michaela, Zimina Mariia, Zaunschirm Stefan, Kastner Johann, Bajer Jan, Cieslar Miroslav, 3D analysis of macrosegregation in twin-roll cast AA3003 alloy, Materials Characterization (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.023
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
3D analysis of macrosegregation in twin-roll cast AA3003 alloy
RI
ˇ akov´ Michaela Slap´ aa,∗, Mariia Ziminaa , Stefan Zaunschirmb , Johann Kastnerb , Jan Bajera , Miroslav Cieslara a Charles
NU
SC
University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ke Karlovu 5, 121 16 Prague 2, Czech Republic b University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstrasse 23, 4600 Wels, Austria
MA
Abstract
Twin-roll cast aluminium alloys have a high potential for industrial applications. However, one of the drawbacks of such materials is an inhomogeneous
D
structure generated by macrosegregation, which appears under certain condi-
TE
tions in the center of sheets during solidification. Segregations in AA3003 alloy form as manganese, iron and silicon rich channels spread in the rolling direction. Their spatial distribution was successfully detected by X-ray computed
AC CE P
tomography. Scanning electron microscopy was used for a detailed observation of microstructure, morphology and chemical analysis of the segregation. Keywords: Aluminium alloys, Twin-roll casting, Macrosegregation, Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray computed tomography
1. Introduction
1.1. Twin-roll casting Twin-roll casting (TRC) is a casting technique, which provides a relatively high solidification rate (∼500 K/s). During TRC molten metal is poured be5
tween two water-cooled rotating rolls, which are designed to fill both a heat ∗ Corresponding
author ˇ akov´ Email addresses:
[email protected] (Michaela Slap´ a),
[email protected] (Mariia Zimina),
[email protected] (Stefan Zaunschirm),
[email protected] (Johann Kastner),
[email protected] (Jan Bajer),
[email protected] (Miroslav Cieslar)
Preprint submitted to Materials Characterization
March 31, 2016
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
exchanger and a rolling function. The metal solidifies on rolls into a strip that is further work-hardened by the rolls. Besides that, in contrast to other rapid solidification techniques, TRC allows production of large amounts of strip ma-
The high solidification rate during TRC results in a microstructure refine-
SC
10
RI
terial and combines both fast solidification and rolling in a single step.
ment, formation of finely distributed primary particles and high solid solution supersaturation [1, 2, 3], which is considerably higher than in materials obtained
NU
by conventional direct-chill casting (DC) [4, 5].
15
MA
1.2. Segregation
TRC strips can suffer from macrosegregation in a form of central eutectic segregates. The formation of these defects usually leads to premature fracture
D
and reduced strength and can influence the fatigue behavior [6]. The influence of casting speed, cooling rate, temperature of the melt and other parameters on
20
TE
the final microstructure is very significant (e.g. [7]). However, the establishment of the appropriate casting conditions varies for different materials and is time
AC CE P
consuming. Therefore, the study of the center line segregation formed after TRC is of great interest since it can be useful for optimization of casting conditions. Yun et. al. [8] reported that central macrosegregations are cylindrical low
melting point regions oriented in the casting direction and appear as a result of 25
combined solidification and rolling process. Such channels formed in the central plane have almost constant spacing and are at least an order of magnitude larger in size than dendritic grains in their vicinity [9, 10]. The probability of formation of the segregation increases with decreasing strip thickness or decreasing load and with increasing amount of alloying elements [8].
30
Segregated channels reveal predominantly eutectic features. This suggests that a hot rolling component of the TRC process squeezes the mushy zone in between the already solidified skins that become thicker as they move into the roll gap. The liquid, which is enriched in alloying elements, is thus forced to the opposite side of the casting direction [9]. With advancement of the solidification
35
front, the concentration of solutes in liquid phase gradually increases. The liquid 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
is trapped when the two solid skins weld together at a so-called Kiss point, and well defined solute-rich channels form. The higher is the casting rate the shorter are these channels.
alloys and showed that AA3003 alloy has a long freezing range, which makes
SC
40
RI
Birol [9] focused in his work on solidification path of several aluminium
the alloy more prone to macrosegregation. Solubilities cS of manganese and iron in aluminium solid solution are similar. However, the solubility of iron in
NU
liquid aluminium cL is much higher than the solubility in solid aluminium – cS /cL ∼ 0.02 [11]. Hence, the concentration of iron in liquid increases rapidly during solidification, forming a concentration gradient of iron content along the
MA
45
strip thickness – the iron concentration is the highest near the Kiss point [10]. Solubilities of manganese in both liquid and solid aluminium are comparable,
50
TE
1.3. Al-Mn alloys
D
therefore no such gradient forms during solidification.
Various alloying elements are added into aluminium alloys to improve their
AC CE P
properties. The most common in AA3003 series alloys, which find their application mainly in automobile industry, are manganese, iron, silicon and copper. These elements are known to have strong influence on the precipitation behavior [12, 13]. Iron and silicon greatly decrease solubility of manganese in solid 55
solution and accelerate precipitation of intermetallic compounds. Copper can enhance decomposition of the supersaturated solid solution [14]. Two main phases which are frequently observed in Al-Mn-Fe-Si alloys are or-
thorhombic Al6 (Mn,Fe) and cubic α-Al12−15 (Mn,Fe)3 Si1−2 [15, 16, 17]. Several morphologies of these particles were described – faceted polyhedra, dendrite, 60
elongated rods, Chinese script, branched skeleton [18]. The main factors influencing the morphology and crystallographic phase are chemical composition and cooling rate [19]. Size and distribution of intermetallic particles have fundamental role in controlling the alloys microstructure evolution during processing [20, 21] and re-
65
crystallization as they can both stimulate or impede the grain growth [16, 22]. 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
To minimize their negative effects on functional properties of final product the efforts are focused on the possibility to control their formation [18].
In twin-roll cast Al-Mn-Fe-Si sheets the primary particles located in the
casting direction and their distribution is finer. Towards the central line the
SC
70
RI
vicinity of the strip surfaces are nearly spherical, exhibit strong alignment in
solute levels decrease and coarser intermetallic particles are encountered [2]. This inhomogeneity cannot be reduced by homogenization treatment. Sun et.
NU
al [15] showed that various shape particles are the same phase which has no fixed orientation relationship to the Al matrix. They are polygonal plates which appear to be of various form due to a different angle of view.
MA
75
1.4. X-ray computed tomography
D
The microstructural analysis is conventionally carried out in 2D by means of light optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. For information in
80
TE
3D subsequent cuts through the sample are analyzed. However, such techniques are destructive and rather time consuming. Sectioning by a focused ion beam in
AC CE P
scanning electron microscope provides high resolution images but is applicable only on limited volumes of materials. An example of nondestructive method of material characterization is X-ray
computed tomography (XCT), which has become very important technique for 85
3D characterization of materials [23]. It is widely used for detection of cracks and pores, evaluation of parameters of cellular materials and visualization of intermetallic phases in metals [24]. XCT utilizes an X-ray source, a turntable as well as a digital detector (Figure 1). A sample is placed on a rotary table between the X-ray source and the
90
detector. A projection image is generated at various angular positions, hundreds of projection images are needed to reconstruct a 3D dataset with a mathematical algorithm. The generated volumetric dataset consists of volumetric pixels, so called voxels, which feature a grey value corresponding to the density and the atomic number of the elements within that voxel [24].
95
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the morphology of central 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
tional techniques and by X-ray computed tomography.
RI
2. Experimental
PT
macrosegregation in twin-roll cast AA3003 aluminium alloy by both conven-
100
SC
Experimental aluminium alloy from AA3003 series with composition: 1.0 wt.% Mn, 0.2 wt.% Fe, 0.6 wt.% Si, 0.2 wt.% Cu and 0.2 wt.% Zr was twin-roll cast in
NU
industrial conditions. The melt was cast from temperature 720 ◦ C between two water-cooled rolls with diameter 600 mm. The casting speed was 600 mm/min and the final thickness and width of the strip were 8.5 mm and 1 m, respectively.
105
MA
The microstructure of the central segregation after casting was investigated by means of light optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray computed tomography.
D
For observation in light optical microscope (LOM) Olympus GX51 and in
TE
scanning electron microscope (SEM) FEI Quanta 200 FX FEG samples were cut in all three perpendicular directions – rolling (RD), transverse (TD) and normal (ND) and mechanically ground on SiC papers and polished by diamond
AC CE P
110
suspension. SEM was used for observation in back scattered electrons (BSE) at 10 kV, for chemical analysis by energy dispersive spectrometry at 15 kV (EDS) operated by EDAX Genesis software and for grains visualization by electron back scatter diffraction at 10 kV (EBSD) equipped with EDAX EBSD camera 115
and OIM software.
X-ray computed tomography measurements were carried out using a Nan-
otom 180NF desktop device from General Electric with a 2316x2316 Hamamatsu flat panel detector and a 180 keV nano-focus tube with transmission target and an equipped external liquid cooling system to stabilize measurements. The scan 120
was performed with 95 keV acceleration voltage using 210 µA and a 0.1 mm copper prefilter, achieving a voxel size of (5.25 µm)3 . Reconstruction was done with the software GE phoenix datos|x 2 reconstruction 2.2.1 using a 3x3 inline median filter and a beam hardening correction. For visualization and evaluation the software VGStudio MAX 2.2 was used whereby the surface near region
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
was excluded during evaluation to reduce influence of artefacts. For noise re-
PT
125
duction a 9x9x9 median filter was applied, the starting value for the advanced surface determination was chosen to be µ+3.5 σ. µ is the expected value of the
SC
RI
Gaussian distribution from the matrix material, the standard deviation is σ.
3. Results and discussion
Twin-roll casting produces a material with an inhomogeneous structure.
NU
130
Grains near the strip surface are elongated and inclined towards the rolling direction. In the central part of the strip grains are more equiaxed. However,
MA
they are still slightly inclined and merge at the central line where the solidification path ended (Figure 2). Their inclination is ∼20◦ towards the rolling direction. For more details about the grain structure see [25].
TE
3.1. Microstructure
D
135
During solidification of the strip the two solidification fronts are coming from the surface and the melt is enriched in alloying elements. When the two solid-
140
AC CE P
ification fronts finally meet, solute rich segregation of primary particles forms. Such segregations have a form of long channels stretching along the rolling direction. Overviews of their distribution from light optical microscope and scanning electron microscope are given in Figures 3 and 4. The length of each segregation is several mm in the rolling direction, which is several times larger than the average grain size [26]. The mutual spacing between each segregation in the 145
transverse direction is (500 ± 100) µm. However, they are not aligned in one plane but are distributed in a band with the width of approximately 1 mm in the central part (Fig. 3a and 5a). The density of the channels is in the magnitude of 10 mm−2 . In average, their width is 60 µm and their height is 100 µm. Detailed images (Fig. 5b and 5c) from SEM reveal that the size and shape
150
of primary particles forming the segregation are not homogeneous. Some of the segregations contain coarse primary particles with irregular shape and diameter of around 20 µm. Usually they are not continuous but contain aluminium spots inside them. 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
155
PT
A majority of segregations is composed of two types of particles. Both types can be recognized in more detail in Fig. 6a. Larger particles have irregular shape and size 2-5 µm. Smaller particles are elongated and form ”fan shaped”
RI
structures. These two types of particles are spatially divided into groups which
SC
are closely adjacent to each other (see the right part of Figure 5c). The size of these groups reaches 100 µm in section perpendicular to the normal direction in 160
larger segregations. The different morphologies (blocky, dendritic) of primary
NU
particles coexisting next to each other were also reported in other aluminium
MA
alloys, e.g. [15, 16, 14, 18]. 3.2. Chemical analysis
EDX analysis was performed on several segregations in order to investigate their composition. Examples of distribution maps of aluminium and main alloy-
D
165
ing elements in AA3003 alloys – manganese, iron, silicon and copper – are shown
TE
in Figure 6. In BSE the segregation appears as bright spots in a dark aluminium matrix (Fig. 6a). EDX analysis proved that the segregation is composed mainly
170
AC CE P
of Mn and Fe located generally in the same particle (Fig. 6c and 6d). Silicon is also partially present in the Mn- and Fe-containing particles but
mainly appears in their interspace in clusters with size comparable to these particles (Fig. 6e).
Copper containing particles (Fig. 6f) were observed adjacent to the larger
particles rich in Mn and Fe. This is in accordance with observation of Jaradeh 175
[14] who reported in 3003 alloy that most of the Al-Mn-Fe elongated precipitates were decorated by phases rich in copper. Although maps in Figure 6 suggest that Mn and Fe are dominant in the segregation, EDS point analysis shows that the dominant element is still Al. The composition of larger particles fluctuates around 65 wt.% Al, 16 wt.% Mn,
180
11 wt.% Fe and 8 wt.% Si. Majority of these particles was identified by EBSD as cubic α-Al(Mn,Fe)Si phase with a = 1.264 nm [27] which is one of the two main phases usually observed in Al-Mn-Fe-Si type alloys [28]. 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
185
PT
3.3. X-ray computed tomography X-ray computed tomography enables detailed observation of the spatial ar-
RI
rangement of the segregation. The resulted distribution is depicted in Figure 7 for all three principal directions and also in Figure 8 in a general observation an-
SC
gle. XCT clearly confirms that the segregation forms long channels oriented in the rolling direction in the central part of the strip. The direction is consistent with the one reported by Yun at. al. [8].
NU
190
Figure 7b documents the fan shape distribution of segregations and also the inclinations of the segregations in the rolling direction by ∼20◦ which corre-
MA
sponds to the orientation of grains near the central part of the strip (Fig. 2). Figure 7a clearly shows the inhomogeneity of the segregation along the transverse direction – fan shaped smaller particles with larger blocky ones.
D
195
TE
4. Conclusion
In modified twin-roll cast AA3003 aluminium strips central segregations form
AC CE P
during solidification. They have a shape of channels elongated in the rolling direction with the length up to several mm and thickness in the order of 100 µm. 200
The primary particles forming the segregation occur in different sizes and are of α-Al(Mn,Fe)Si phase. X-ray computed tomography is a quick and non-destructive method which
provides information about the presence and spatial distribution of the segregation. Scanning electron microscopy is suitable for detailed observation of 205
morphology and phases identification of the segregations.
Acknowledgement ˇ P107-12-0921, GAUK 227085 and The financial support of grants GACR ˇ M.Z., J. B. and M.C. SVV-2015-260213 are gratefully acknowledged by M.S., S.Z. and J.K. thank FFG, the governments of Upper Austria and Styria for the 210
support of the K-Project ZPT+.
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
References [1] M. Sl´ amov´ a, P. Sl´ ama, M. Cieslar, The influence of alloy composition on
RI
phase transformations and recrystallization in twin-roll cast Al-Mn-Fe al-
215
SC
loys, Materials Science Forum 519-521 (2006) 365–370.
[2] Y. Birol, Homogenization of a twin-roll cast thin Al-Mn strip, Journal of
NU
Alloys and Compounds 471 (2009) 122–127.
[3] C. Gras, M. Meredith, J. D. Hunt, Microstructure and texture evolution after twin roll casting and subsequent cold rolling of Al-Mg-Mn aluminium
220
MA
alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 169 (2005) 156–163. [4] N. Sun, B. R. Patterson, J. P. Suni, E. A. Simielli, H. Weiland, L. F. Allard,
D
Microstructural evolution in twin roll cast AA3105 during homogenization,
TE
Materials Science and Engineering A 416 (2006) 232–239. [5] W. C. Liu, T. Zhai, J. G. Morris, Texture evolution of continuous cast
225
AC CE P
and direct chill cast AA 3003 aluminum alloys during cold rolling, Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 83–88.
[6] S. Xin, L. Tan, X. Guangming, Composition homogenization evolution of twin-roll cast 7075 aluminum alloy using electromagnetic field, Rare Metal Materials and Engineering 44 (3) (2015) 581 – 586. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1875-5372(15)30043-6.
230
[7] B. Forbord, B. Andersson, F. Ingvaldsen, O. Austevik, J. A. Horst, I. Skauvik, The Formation of surface segregates during twin roll casting of aluminim alloys, Materials Science and Engineering A 415 (2006) 12–20. [8] M. Yun, S. Lokyer, J. D. Hunt, Twin roll casting of aluminium alloys, Materials Science and Engineering A 280 (2000) 116–123.
235
[9] Y. Birol, Analysis of macro segregation in twin-roll cast aluminium strips via solidification curves, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 486 (2009) 168– 172. 9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
[10] Z. Lv, F. Du, Z. An, H. Huang, Z. Xu, J. Sun, Centerline segregation mechanism of twin-roll cast A3003 strip, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 643 240
(2015) 270 – 274. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.
RI
04.132.
SC
[11] N. A. Belov, D. G. Eskin, A. A. Askenov, Multicomponent Phase Diagrams: Applications for Commercial Aluminum Alloys, 1st Edition, Elsevier, 2005.
245
NU
[12] Y. J. Li, L. Arnberg, Quantitative study on the precipitation behaviour of dispersoids in DC-cast AA3003 alloy during heating and homogenization,
MA
Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 3415–3428.
[13] M. Karl´ık, M. Vronka, P. Hauˇsild, M. H´ajek, Influence of cold rolling on the precipitation in an AlMnZr alloy, Materials & Design 85 (2015) 361 –
D
366. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.023. [14] M. M. R. Jaradeh, T. Carlberg, Solidification studies of 3003 aluminium
TE
250
alloys with Cu and Zr additions, Journal of Materials Science & Technology
AC CE P
27 (2011) 615–627.
[15] D. L. Sun, S. B. Kang, H. S. Koo, Characterization of morphology and crystal structure of α-phase in two Al-Mn-Mg alloys, Materials Chemistry
255
and Physics 63 (2000) 37–43.
[16] M. Karl´ık, T. M´ anik, H. Lauschman, Influence of Si and Fe on the distribution of intermetallic compounds in twin-roll cast Al-Mn-Zr alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 515 (2012) 108–113. [17] M. Dehmas, R. Vald´es, M.-C. Lafont, J. Lacaze, B. Viguier, Identifica260
tion of intermetallic precipitates formed during re-solidification of brazed aluminium alloys, Scripta Materialia 55 (2006) 191–194. [18] M. Warmuzek, G. Mrwka, J. Sieniawski, Influence of the heat treatment on the precipitation of the intermetallic phases in commercial AlMn1FeSi alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 157-158 (2004) 624–632.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[19] T. Gao, Y. Wu, C. Li, X. Liu, Morphologies and Growth Mechanisms of
PT
265
α-Al(FeMn)Si in Al-Si-Fe-Mn Alloy, Materials Letters 110 (2013) 191–194.
RI
[20] Y. J. Li, A. M. F. Muggerund, A. Olsen, T. Furu, Precipitation of partially coherent α-Al(Mn,Fe)Si dispersoids and their strengthening effect in AA
270
SC
3003 alloy, Acta Materialia 60 (2012) 1004–1014.
[21] K. Huang, Y. J. Li, K. Marthinsen, Effect of heterogeneously distributed
NU
pre-existing dispersoids on the recrystallization behavior of a cold-rolled AlMnFeSi alloy, Materials Characterization 102 (2015) 92–97.
MA
[22] K. Huang, R. E. Log´e, K. Marthinsen, On the sluggish recrystallization of a cold-rolled Al-Mn-Fe-Si alloy, Journal of Materials Science. 275
[23] J. Kastner, B. Harrer, H. P. Degischer, High resolution cone beam X-ray
D
computed tomography of 3D-microstructures of cast Al-alloys, Materials
TE
Characterization 62 (2011) 99–107. [24] J. Kastner, S. Zauschirm, S. Baumgartner, G. Requena, H. Pinto,
280
3D-microstructure characterization of thermonecanically
AC CE P
G. Garc´es,
treated Mg-alloy by high resolution x-ray computed tomography, in: 11t h
European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Prague, 2014, pp. 163– 171.
[25] M. Pokov´ a, M. Zimina, M. Cieslar, O. Grydin, Investigation of asymmetric rolling applied to twin-roll cast Al-Mn alloy, in: Metal 2015 Conference
285
Proceedings, Brno, 2015, p. 3816. ˇ akov´ [26] M. Slap´ a Pokov´ a, M. Cieslar, M. Zimina, Grain refinement in Al-MnFe-Si alloys by severe plastic deformation, Manufacturing Technology 15 (2015) 679–684. [27] M. Pokov´ a, M. Zimina, M. Cieslar, The Influence of Equal Channel Angular
290
Pressing on Microstructure Evolution during In-situ Heating in Transmission Electron Microscope, International Journal of Materials Research 106 (2015) 676–681. 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
[28] H. Chen, Q. Chen, Y. Du, J. Btatberg, A. Engstrom, Update of Al-Fe-Si, Al-Mn-Si and Al-Fe-Mn-Si thermodynamic descriptions , Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 24 (7) (2014) 2041 – 2053. doi:http:
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63310-0.
AC CE P
295
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Fig1
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
Fig2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Fig3a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Fig3b
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
Fig4
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
Fig5a
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
Fig5b
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
Fig5c
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
Fig6a
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
Fig6b
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
Fig6d
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
Fig6f
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Fig7a
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
Fig7b
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
Fig7c
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Fig8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Graphical Abstract
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights
AC
CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC R
IP
T
Macrosegregations in twin-roll cast sheets stretch along the rolling direction. X-ray computed tomography is an effective tool for visualization of the segregation. The segregations copy the shape of grain boundaries.