A Comparison Of Forced Feed Cycling Of The Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Over Iron And Cobalt Catalysts

A Comparison Of Forced Feed Cycling Of The Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Over Iron And Cobalt Catalysts

191 S. Kaliaguine and A. Mahay (Editors), Catalysis on the Energy Scene © 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlan...

461KB Sizes 2 Downloads 26 Views

191

S. Kaliaguine and A. Mahay (Editors), Catalysis on the Energy Scene © 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

A COMPARISON OF FORCED FEED CYCLING OF THE FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS OVER IRON AND COBALT CATALYSTS

A.A. Adesina, P.L. Silveston and R.R. Hudgins Chemical

Engineering Department,

University

of Waterloo,

Waterloo,

Ontario,

Canada N2L 3Gl

INTRODUCTION In

recent

years,

a

substantial

effort

has

been

devoted

to

detai led

examination of the effect of periodic operation on chemical processes. the

possible

improvement

in

time-average

reaction

rates

under

Besides periodic

operation (forced cycling), enhanced selectivity to desired products is also a potential

benefit

laboratory,

to

Feimer

be

[1]

sought

was the

from first

complex to

reaction

study

the

systems.

effect

of

In

forced

our feed

concentration cycling on both reaction rate and product selectivity in the FT synthesis

for

hydrocarbon

polymerisation reaction. led to improvement in gasoline range

production

over

an

iron

He observed that cyclical

catalyst

-

a

complex

feed composition changes

the methanation rates whereas the formation rates for

hydrocarbons

remained

practically

unaffected.

Consequently,

selectivity under periodic operation dropped below its steady-state value. This

paper

compares

results

over

the

cobalt

catalyst

for

similar

experiments.

EXPERIMENTAL The experimental system and product analysis procedure for these two studies on iron and cobalt were similar. of

the preset temperature.

pre-purified Hz and

The oil bath was controlled to within + 1°C

A11 feed gases were predri ed and premi xed from

CP grade CO.

Detai ls

of

generating

square wave feed

concentrations are given elsewhere [2,3]. The i ron catalyst promoted with copper and potassium was provi ded by Exxon Corporation

while

the

kieselguhr-supported

United Catalysts Inc., Louisville, Kentucky. about 0.25 mn and 0.15

Jml

respectively.

cobalt

catalyst was

supplied

by

Catalyst particle diameters were

In each case, the catalyst bed was

192 diluted with about 5:1 with quartz beads to ensure uniform temperature within the bed [4 J. The reactor, a simple fixed bed with thermocouples placed within the bed and entrance to the reactor, also had a preheater coil for the reactant gas and the Differential conversions « 10%) were

whole assembly immersed in the oil bath. maintained in all runs.

Various diagnostic criteria and experiments were used

to demonstrate that the kinetic data were free from transport intrusions. The

literature

[5J

suggests

that

iron

FT catalysts

have

much

higher

stabi 1ity and product i vity with operating pressure in the range 3-10 atm whil e optimal performance for the cobalt catalyst is found in the interval 1-3 atm. Both, however, thrive in the normal In

our

studies,

these

FT reaction temperature range (450-600K).

considerations

combined

with

equipment

limitations

necessitated the use of 519K and 384 kPa pressure for the iron catalyst and experimental conditi ons for the cobalt catalyst were 473K and 115 kPa.

Data

from cyclic operation were obtained under cycle-invariant states. Hydrocarbons were analysed using a Carle gas chromatograph, AGC-211 equipped with a flame ionisation detector. to C9 components were monitored. Fluorad

-

were

used

to

Because of the low conversions, only the C1 Two separate parallel columns - Poracil C and

separate

the

C1

to

C5

and

C6

to

C9

fractions

respecti vely. The infrared

(IR) spectrophotometer (Beckmann Acculab 2) was set at 2360

cm- 1 wave number to provide continuous monitoring of the COz concentration in the product.

Water

product was removed

over

a Dri eri te fi 1ter.

Further

details are given by Feimer [IJ and Adesina [3J.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Steady-state results for the iron and cobalt catalysts were obtained over

< YH z < 1.

the feed composition range t ,e, 0 olefin

formers,

maxima

in

ratios.

the

except

at

steady-state

high

Hz

curves

feed

were

Both catalysts were primarily

concentrations

heavily

skewed

(YH > 0.8). The z towards high Hz/CO

However, cobalt appears to be a better olefin former than iron.

agrees with the findings of

Bell

[6J.

Even t~ough

This

the mechanism of the FT

reaction is not fully understood, models based on the oxygenated intermediate mechani sm seem to descri be the methane steady state data for both catalysts reasonably well [1,3J. Response to step-change feed concentrations [2J gave overshoots higher than maximum attainable steady-state rates during transients on both catalysts (see Figure 1).

Even so, the magnitudes of the overshoots for some hydrocarbons and

193

2

T

a

473 K

pa 115 kPa

240

Fig. 1. Alkene Production Following Step-Changes In Feed Concentration Over Co Catalyst.

1.4 10.1

Q~

~~

1.2

....I~

c[> 2c[ Q::'

010.1 1.0

%2

i= 0.8

0

_~E

~-

Cz

4

8

/2

PERIOD (min)

Fig. 2. Normalized Time-Average Rate as a Function of Period for C to C l 3 Over Fe Catalyst.

194

the relaxation times to the steady-state were substantially different on iron and cobalt.

These differences are symptomatic of the dissimilarities between

the catalysts under periodic operation.

Nevertheless, for both iron [2J and

cobalt [3J catalysts, there was evidence that carbon, probably as carbide, diffused into and out of storage in the solid catalyst bulk during transient operations. Rate improvements through peri odi c operation are to be expected when the cycle periods approximate the relaxation times of the overshoots observed in step-change experiments.

Gradually, the relaxati on times found

for cobalt

(approx. 40 minutes) were about twice those for the iron catalyst.

As a

result, studies on cycling over cobalt were done in a range of cycle-periods about double those for iron. Figure 2 shows the effect of cycling period on normalized time-average rates for the C1 to C3 products over iron [1J.

Only the methanation rate was

improved above the steady-state value (=1.0).

Results are not shown for the

C4 + species since they also exhibit no rate improvement. However, over cobalt catalyst for symmetrical cycles having a time-average mole fraction of hydrogen in the feed, m=O.825, the C1 to C7 formation rates were improved, the optimum period being 40 minutes.

Figure 3 is typical of

the general behavi our. Although the ranges of cycle periods differ, time-average rates for both cata lysts approach the quasi -steady-state va1ue « 1.0).

(The quas i-steady

state is simply a mixed output of the steady-state rates correspondi ng to the feed compositions used in each part of the cycle).

In this case, the feed

duri ng one hal f-cycle was pure H2 , correspondi ng to a zero steady-state rate. Thus, the improvement in time-average rates is simply a manifestation of the overshoot that results from forced repetition. For the iron catalyst, the overshoot arising from the diffusion of a bulk phase carbide inventory enhances the surface reaction rate. times found

for cobalt suggest that the bulk-diffusi onal

than with iron.

Longer relaxation process is slower

Since the FT synthesis is a polymerisation, it would appear

that the weaker overshoot for the C2 + species on i ron is probably due to the relaxation to steady-state concentrations of surface relaxes to C2 + species before any appreciable chain construction occurs.

Thus, the chain propagation

would only be due to the contribution of surface carbon atoms.

The longer

relaxation times found for cobalt suggest that there was probably enough time for chain growth.

Consequently, the contribution by carbon from within the

bulk and surface capacitance made possible the occurrence of overshoots higher than

the

maximum

attainable

steady

state.

The

result

was

to

improve

195

o

PROPANE ETHANE a ETHENE METHANE a OVERALL l!. PROPENE • •

2

55

OUASI- STEADY-STATE LINE FOR OVERALL RATE OF REACTION

oL - -_ _......L o 20

..L.-

.-...Jl.-

40

60

-.L:-__ 80

CYCLE PERIOD (min)

Fig. 3. Effect of Cycling on Rate with Cycle-Splat of 0.5 and Amplitude of 0.125 for C1 to C3; Co Catalyst.

"z

FEIllER (I I l!. CYCLING A S5 ADESINA 119831 o CYCLING • S5

~

.<:

D ...

....• '0

E E

... ~

II::

O.ZO

a

.n 0.10 0.08

0.04

O.OZ

0.01

I

3

5

7

,

.83

CARBON NUMBER

Fig. 4. Comparison of Flory Plots for Steady-State and Cycling over Co and Fe Catalysts.

196 time-average production for C1 to C7 under cycling.

It is also apparent that

the lack of improvement for the C8 and C9 products could be attributed to the slow polymerisation process that dampens the overshoot phenomenon. Selectivity to higher molecular weight

products

in

the FT synthesis

is

usually measured in terms of the chain growth probability, a. Under steady-state reaction conditions the rate is related to a by means of the Schulz-Flory model:

A semilog plot of r versus n, carbon number, yields a straight line with slope In a.

Figure 4 is an extension of the normal plot for the products over iron

and cobalt to include both steady and cycling operation. at

steady

state

gasoline-range

the

cobalt

hydrocarbons

selectivity seemed to fall

catalyst

than

the

produced

iron

a

It is evident that

higher

catalyst.

In

fraction

addition,

of

while

slightly (5%) under periodic operation for iron,

there was a slight improvement (5%) in the selectivity for cobalt.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support Engineering

for

this

Research

work

was

Council

provided (NSERC)

through

grant.

a

Natural

Thanks

are

Sciences due

to

and Exxon

Corporation and United Catalysts Inc , , Louisville, Kentucky for the iron and cobalt catalysts respectively.

One of us (A.A.A.) also appreciates the study

leave granted by the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5

J.L. Feimer, "A Study of the Forced-Feed Composition Cycling in the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 19B2. J.L. Feimer, P.L. Silveston and R.R. Hudgins, "Influence of Forced Cycling on the Fi scher-Tropsch Synthes is, Part I. Response to Feed Concent rat ion Step-Changes", Can. J. Chern. Eng., in press, 1984. A.A. Adesina, "Transient Studies of the Fischer-Tropsch Reaction", M.A.Sc. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1984. D.E. Mears, "Diagnostic Criteria for Heat Transport Limitations in Fixed Bed Reactors", J. Cata1., 20, 127-131 (1971). Storch, H.H., N. Goulombic and R.B. Anderson, "Fischer-Tropsch and Related Syntheses", John Wiley, New York, 1951.