A convenient synthesis of lunularic acid

A convenient synthesis of lunularic acid

TetrahedronlettersNo. 16, pp 1615 - 1617, 1972. A CONVENIENT PergamonPress. Printed in &eat Britain. SYNTHESIS OF LUNULARIC ACID Y. Arai, T. Kami...

129KB Sizes 22 Downloads 92 Views

TetrahedronlettersNo. 16, pp 1615 - 1617, 1972.

A CONVENIENT

PergamonPress.

Printed in &eat Britain.

SYNTHESIS OF LUNULARIC ACID

Y. Arai, T. Kamikawa and T. Kubota* Faculty of Science, Osaka City University,

Sumiyoshiku,

Osaka, Japan

(Receivedin Japan 23 February1972; receivedin UK for plblioation14 March1972) Recently

lunularic acid

(lb), a new growth inhibitor from Lunularia

(L) Dum., has been isolated and characterized. was provided by the derivation

olysis of 3 would give dimethoxy

Several methods

5

However,

into lb by hydrogenolysis.

acid

(4),6 we have obtained

acid with a phenol4 seemed

of 4 and dimethyl

allene-1,3-dicarboxylate

3H, 8). 3.72

acid.

(5)' in a

3-methoxvhomophthalate

sample, in 42% yield in one step. acids.

acid from l-

3-methoxyhomophthalic

(7a), iden-

This represents

The minor product,

reaction was assigned the structure

6(CC14) l-2.2

Of the

the poor overall yield caused this route to be

synthesis of homophthalic

the Diels-Alder

of 3-

(7~) has been prepared by longer se-

sealed tube at 180° for 17 hours gave dimethyl tical with the authentic

acid in 21%

for the preparation

By applying the novel synthesis of 3-methoxyphthalic

Heating the mixture

evidence.

synthesisoflunularic

of a homophthalic

The required homophthalic

methoxycyclohexa-1,3-diene

excellent

Hydrogen-

(la), but the yield of 3 from 3-

have been investigated

the condensation

quence of reactions. rejected.

four-step

which would be converted

available,

attractive.

The synthesis of

anhydride was only 1.5% at best. 3

arylisocoumarins, methods

(2).lr2

(3), has already been reported.

lunularic acid

We wish to describe an efficient overall yield.

Final proof of the structure

of lb from hydrangenol

2, via 7,4'-dimethoxvbenzalphthalide

methoxyphthalic

1

cruciata

an

5% in yield, of

(6) on the basis of NMR

(4H, m), 3.06 (lH, m, He), 3.40, 3.56 and 3.62

(each

(lH, t, J=3 Hz, Hd), 5.62 (lH, d, J=3 Hz, Hc), 6.08 (lH, dd, J=6,

1615

1616

No. 16

%R %m (la)

(lb)

R=Me R=H

(2)

iHW= ‘6#+Me

‘6

!HCqMe

(4)

(3)

(5)

Ha tib

( 7a) (7b)

(6)

(7~)

(8a) (8b)

R=Me R=H

R’ R2=Me R’IH$=Me R’ = R’ = H

IVO.16

1617

9 Hz, Hb) and 6.36 ppm

(lH, cl, J=9 Hz, Ha).

Mild alkaline hydrolysis hydrolysis

(7b).

(acid or base) of Ja gave 3-methoxyhomophthalic

with the authentic the isocoumarin data.

of 7a gave the.half ester

sample.

5

Condensation

(Ea), mp 161-162O,

of Jc

on the condition used.

acid la in quantitative yield, mp 195-196'

acid

(7c), identical

with anisole in PPA at 90° gave

in 81% yield with the expected

When lb was condensed with anisole,the

obtained depending

More vigorous

Catalytic

yield, which afforded,

(lit. mp 192").l

keto ester

spectroscopic

(9) together with 8a was

hydrogenation

of 8a gave the

on treatment with BBr3, lb in 63%

The IR spectrum is identical with that of

the natural acid and the UV and mass spectra are in accord with the published data. Preliminary

tests for the biological

carried out using Avena straight growth, ed IAA-induced etiolated

(5 mg/l) elongation

seedlings.

activity of the synthetic At concentrations

of coleoptile

lb were

lo-30 mg/l it inhibit-

segments excised from 4 day-old

Kinetic studies, however, appear to show that the inhibition

was elicited not in a competitive manner.

Detailed

information will appear else-

where. We thank Professor W. W. Schwabe, Department London,

of Horticulture,

University

of

for the supply of the IR spectrum of lunularic acid and Professor Y.

Masuda, Department

of Biology, Osaka City University,

for biological

tests.

References 1.

I. F. M. Valio, R. S. Burdon and W. W. Schwabe, Nature, 223, 1176

2.

Y. Asahina

and J. Asano, Ber., 62, 171 (1929); 63, 429 (1930).

3.

Y. Asahina

and J. Asano, Ber., 63, 2059 (1930).

4.

G. N. Dorofeenko,

E. V. Kutznetsov

and V. E. Ryabinina,

Tetrahedron

(1969).

Letters,

711 (1969). 5.

K. Nitta, J. Imai, I. Yamamoto

and Y. Yamamoto, Agr. Biol. Chem., 21, 817

(1963). 6.

A. J. Birch and P. Hextall, Austral.

7.

E. R. H. Jones, G. H. Mansfield

J. Chem., S, 96 (1955).

and M. C. Whiting,

J. Chem. Sot., 1954, 3208.