Cl Cfremistry,132 (1977) Cl-
dOUlRtl~of~~nometai~ic .@ Wsmier
~uoiaS.A.,Lausanne-_nt~in'KeNetheriands
Preliminary
A FACILE
Ann M. Paul
Cczrznxmication
ROUTE
TO
English,
LeMfaux?
Cr(C0)5(CX)
Keith
and
R. Plowman,
28 February.
Ian
COMPLEXES
S. Butler*,
GLrard
Jao~en"~,
Thdpot t
Jean-Yves
Department of Chemistry, H3A 2K6 and TLaboratoire de Rennes, 35031 Rennes
Received
(X = S, Se)
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada de chimie des organomEtalliques, Universits Cedex, France
1977
Summary Reaction gives
of
Cr(CO)5(CSe),
containing
only
the
CO and
(g6-C6H5R)Cr(CO)2(CS) much
all
higher
yield
While
numerous
the Group
still
first CSe
than
the
VIIB
rare
and
and
(X = S,
Se)
are
(N = Cr, MO, complexes
W)
CO afford
by
have
[1,2],
restricted
been
substitution
by various
monodentate
of
reported
metal
in
report
of
the
iigands
almost
Re)
synthesis
1.
The
ligands
in
(L) to fern
(3.11 of
reactions
arc
Arene
(1)
(n6-Arrnc)M(C0)3 fac-M(CO)3L3
[6,7].
Reaction
1 may
be
carried
out
under
either
low
or high
are
type,
the
Cr(CO),(CX) + of arene
for
selenocarbonyls
(M = Mn,
in reaction
3C0 ___3
to the
complex
Cr(CO),(CS)
to complexes
We now
the method
+
pressure
method.
complexes
151.
CO under
reactions
(T15-&,X,)M(CO),(CSe)
(n6-Arene)Cr(CO)2(CX)
analogous
with
VIII.metals
and ~~~-RuC~~(CO)(CS~)(PP~~)~
directly
Similar
literature
thiocarbonyl
excess
of a selenocarbonyl
ligands.
(~6-C6H,C0,CH3)Cr(C0)2(CSe),
Cr(CO)5
example
(R = H, C02CH3)
VIB,
extremely
with
(n6-C6B6)Cr(CO)2(CSe)
pressure
C2 l
conditions. so?ution placed bp
In a typical (So ml)
of
in a Carius
repeated
into
tube
is sealed
off
the
pressure
experiment,
(n6-C6H6)Cr(CO)2(CSe) -7G
(capacity
freeze-thaw
introduced
low
(0.3 ~1)
cycles-
Carbon
from
a calibrated
tube
g.
and
I mmol)
the
[3,8]
solution
monoxide
is
is degassed
(8 mmol)
vacuum
placed in a SO0 oil bath.
and
a tetrahydrofuran
Fs then
manifold
and
the
tube
Under these conditions, the
ol~vimum pressure in the tube assuming that 110 CO gas is dissolved is 8 azz azxd fornation
If CI-(C!O)~(C!S~) is cc~1p1et.e in 3.5
c.arbonyl
reactions
example,
when
ti acetone
have
250
atm
pressure,
u?.
the
solvents of
accomplished
is reacted the
the
the
and
Ci(C0)3(CX)
Cr(CO)5(CX)
(25O/l
x 10e4
t,emperature
line
nitrogen
complexes torr)
traps
based
on
latter
range
is appreciably
malgam
by the
not
from
It should
be obtained residues
large
in
three
cold
fraps: nitrogen
pure
the
3-61
C12CS.
yields
snples
typically
yield
obta%ned
and
here
for of
regenerated
Cr(C0)
the
sodium
of
unlike
5
The
for
involves
treatment
Moreover,
separation
are
on Cr(C0)6.
[lo] which
of
two higher
based
the
the (CS)
does
thiocarbonyl
in the
reactions.
that the literature approach would be
2nIlpossiblefor the synthesis of Cr(CO)S(CSe) oving of C12CSe.
is best
in the
method
05 Cr(C0)6
this
remaining
described
chemical
that
sublimation
tetrahydrofuran
nethod
aaourzts
be nentioned
than
vork
to the high
by vacuum
The
under
product
oting
Analytically
2nd 30-50X
-with excess
or
of
and
chloroform/liquid
finger.
literature
the DRY
physical
the
also
(-78“).
higher
current
anions
roufe,
neccessitate
product
can
of Cr(CO)6
caibonyl
t2iophosgene
(-4Sc).
(n6-Arene)Cr(CO)2(CX)
reduction
resulting
slush
an ice-cooled
73-952
Cr(CO>5(CS)
a sequence
thio-
For
701
Durtig
found
the
191 dissolved
at
carefully
using
ice
g, 3.5 -01)
in 3 h.
We
Only
pressure.
CO in an autoclave
extremely
of th e Solid
onto
(1.0
complexes.
acetone/dry
at high
is complete
be ramoved
on a vacuum
(-63")
vith
reaction
must
cilorobenzene/liquid slush
studled
(r16,6~5c02~3)cr(C)~(CS)
(70 ml)
volatility
so far been
h.
to the non-existanse
c3
The new selenocarbony‘l to~plex, CZ(CO)~(CS~). is a highly volatile, deep-yellov, crystalline solid that sublimes before melting asd has a characteristic odour reminiscent of CSe2.
It
is
air-stable .and soluble
without decomposition in all common organic solvents.
icits
msss
The parent ion
spectrum is consistent with the abundances of the naturally
cccurring isotopes of chromium -2co
is Cr(CO),(CSe)*
and selenium.
> Cr(C0)3(CSe)+,
stepvise loss of CO to give Cr(CSe)+, loss until Cr(CSe) Cr-CSe bonding.
+.
+
degrades to Cr
The non-appearence
line -with the knovn instability of
The initial fragmentation
following which there is
That there is no evidence for CSe
is tentatively indicative of strong of a peak attributable to CSe+ is in CSe
itself 1111.
The vibrational
spectra of the complex are closely similar to those of Cr(CO)3(CS)
1121
and are in accord with the expected Cbv molecular symnnetry. In its IR spectrum in s-hexane,
the complex exhibits three V(C0) modes at 2093m
(=y>,
203lm (ST)
and 2OOOvs (e-1cm-1 and one u(CSe) mode at 1077s ($1
cm-l.
The V(C0) region in the Kaman spectrum (Kr* excitation, 548.2 IUD)
of the solid is complicated by extensive solid-state-splittings
indicative
of more than one molecule per unit cell; the v(CSe) mode appears as broad, media-intense
peak at 1093 cm
In principle., reaction
11
2
.
1 could be extended
to the synthesis of the
other Group VIB H(COj5(CX) complexes provided that suitable examples of the presently unknovn (n6-Arene)H(CO)2(CX) precursors could be.prepared. There has been con&ierable thiocarbonyls
with
the
interest lately in the chemistry of metal
HfCO>5
complexes receiving particular attention
because of their high symmetry and close structural similarity to the matal hexacarbonyls
[e.g., 10.12-141.
We anticipate that Cr(CO)5(CSe) will
be subject to similar attention in the future, especially since diatomic
CSe has never been isolated Ill], and the discovery of this relatively simple selenocarbonyl
complex affords the best opportunity to date for
comparing the bonding properties of CSe With those of the isoelectronic ligands, CO and CS.
Acknowledgements This research was supported by generous grants from the following sources: National Research Council of Canada, Quebec Departnent of Education and C.N.R.S. (France). References 1.
1-S.
2_
I-S_ Butler, Accts_ Chem. Res., submitted for publication.
3.
I.S. Butler, D. Cozak and S.R. Stobart, 3. Chem. Sot., Chem. Commun., 103 (1975).
4.
I.S. Butler, D. Cozak and S.R. Stobart, Inorg. Chem., in press.
5.
G.R. Clark, K.R. Grundy, R-0. Harris, S.M. James and W.R. Roper, J. Organometaf. Chem., 90, C37 (1975).
6_
G-R. Dobson. I.W. Stola and R.K. Sheline. Adv. Inorg. Chen. Radiochen-. 8, 1 (1966).
7.
A. Pidcock, J-D. Smith and B.W. Taylor, 3. Chem. Sot. (A), 1604 (2966) and references cited therein.
8.
D. Cozak, Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1977.
9.
G. Jaouen, Tetrahedron Lett., 52, 5159 (1973); G. Jaouen and G. Sinonneaux. Inorp. Synth.. XIX, in press.
Butler and A.E. Fenster, J. Organonetal.
Chem.,
66, 161 (1974).
10. E-D. Dombek and R.J. Angelici, Inorg. Chen., 15, 1089 (1976) and references cited therein. 11. R. Steudel, Angew. Chen. Internat. Ed., 6, 635 (1967). 12.
1-S.
Butler , A. Garcia-Rodriguez, Inorg. (hem., 15, 2602 (1976).
R.R. Plowman and C.P. Shaw III,
13. M. Poliakoff, lnor . Chem., 15, 2022 (1976). 16. D.L. Lichtenberger and R.F. Fenske, Inorg. Chem., 15, 2015 (1976).