A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION FOR THE HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT

A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION FOR THE HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT

815 JACC March 21, 2017 Volume 69, Issue 11 Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON VAGUS NERVE STIMULA...

924KB Sizes 0 Downloads 41 Views

815 JACC March 21, 2017 Volume 69, Issue 11

Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION FOR THE HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT Poster Contributions Poster Hall, Hall C Saturday, March 18, 2017, 9:45 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Session Title: Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: Heart Failure Gadgets Galore Abstract Category: 14. Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: Therapy Presentation Number: 1199-254 Authors: Gilson Fernandes, Amanda Fernandes, Rhanderson Cardoso, Manuel Rivera, Guilherme Nasi, Gustavo Soares Fernandes, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA

Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) acts by providing augmentation of parasympathetic tone with the theoretical effect of inhibiting progression of heart failure. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing VNS with medical therapy for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for RCTs that compared VNS systems with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for management of HFrEF. Efficacy and safety data were summarized using fixed effect model predicting low heterogeneity between studies. Results: Three RCTs were included, totalizing 575 patients treated with VNS and 373 patients on GDMT. VNS was associated with significant improvement of NYHA functional class (OR 2.36; p<0.01). Freedom from adverse events was observed in 89.4% of patients implanted with the device. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups (OR 1.32; p=0.21). VNS was associated with significant improvement of quality of life and exercise capacity on the individual studies.

Conclusions: VNS was shown to significantly improve the NYHA functional class of patients with HFrEF. VNS was safe, but there was no impact in terms of mortality benefit.