A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of southeastern Australia
E(OLOGHL mODELLInG ELSEVIER
Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203
A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of south...
A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of southeastern Australia David A. King 1 School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S. ~ 2033, Australia
Received 12 April 1994; accepted 8 February 1995
Abstract
A process model of Eucalyptus plantation growth was developed, including limitation of growth by nitrogen and phosphorus, understorey competition for water and nutrients and the occurrence of juvenile foliage in young eucalypts. The model considers plant, litter and soil nutrient cycles and can thus make long-term projections of the impacts of nutrient removal associated with different management practices. The model was parameterized for Eucalyptus sieberi forests in East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia, growing on very phosphorus-deficient soils. Model results suggest that: (1) The presence of juvenile foliage, with high specific leaf area, greatly increases growth rates during the early exponential growth phase. However, wood accumulation increases little in mature forests because the productivity of the adult canopy is not affected by the juvenile phase. (2) Understorey competition for water and nutrients causes a decrease in overstorey growth, but has a smaller effect on long-term wood production, due to feedbacks between production and the removal of nutrients in harvested wood. (3) The use of short rotation cycles would cause soil P stores and productivity to decline, although this decline may not be noticeable over the first century. The predicted rotation length required to maintain long-term productivity is inversely related to the rate of atmospheric deposition of P. (4) Application of phosphorus is projected to increase production, but only if nitrogen inputs are also increased to prevent the latter from becoming limiting in later rotations. As there are uncertainties in some of the model parameters, these projections should be viewed as relative effects, rather than site-specific predictions. Keywords: Eucalyptus; Forest ecosystems; Growth, plant; Nitrogen; Phosphorus
I. Introduction
Foresters generally use empirical functions to predict the growth of a given species within a
1 Present address: Ecosystem Dynamics Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia.
region. This empirical a p p r o a c h may provide adequate growth estimates so long as environmental and soil conditions remain similar to the historical n o r m used to derive the growth functions. M o r e recently developed process-based simulation models provide an integrated u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the biological controls of growth. Process m o d els have b e e n used to evaluate the environmental factors limiting p r o d u c t i o n (e.g. M c M u r t r i e et al.,
1990), the impacts of management practices on long-term productive potential (Kimmins, 1977; Aber et al., 1982; Sachs and Sollins, 1986), and predict the likely impacts of global change on forest growth and carbon storage (Pastor and Post, 1988; Comins and McMurtrie, 1993; Kirschbaum et al., 1994). However, such models are generally difficult to construct and parameterize because the processes controlling growth span a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. This paper presents a rather simple process model of the growth of even-aged Eucalyptus forests. The model includes a number of features of importance in Australian eucalypt forests, including phosphorus limitation of growth, understorey competition for water and nutrients and the occurrence of juvenile foliage which may enhance growth of young eucalypt stands (Beadle et al., 1989). The model employs an integrated representation of the processes of photosynthesis and respiration by calculating the annual conversion of light energy into net biomass gain as influenced by foliar nutrient status, water limitation and stand age. The nutrient concentrations of foliage and other tissues are determined from calculations of nutrient uptake and retranslocation from senescing tissues, as diluted by new biomass production. The model tracks the major nutrient fluxes and cycles (shown in Fig. 1), and can thus estimate the long-term impacts of different management practices on soil nutrient contents and productivity. However, the model does not include such factors as soil compaction and erosion, which may vary with the type of machinery used in logging, and includes a number of uncertainties and approximations. Thus, the results should be viewed as indicating the relative size of different management impacts on production, rather than as specific growth projections. The model was parameterized for Eucalyptus sieberi L. Johnson forests in East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia, where studies of soil and foliar nutrient status and productivity have been carried out by the CSIRO Division of Forestry in Canberra and the Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (Raison et al., 1991,1993). These forests are very deficient in phosphorus as indicated by a foliar N / P ratio of
> N E P transfers ---- - -> Additional P transfers
f~ Overstorey] Ce~°~ iPi h ~ .
ching I
,'~-~ Understoreyh ~
1 I
.~
i i oo ,.,e.i
/~/
I LabilePl~--~
I°rganicmatterl I°rganicmatterl
,
L
j
J
Fig. 1. Major state variables and nutrient cycles considered in the model. Periodic nutrient losses due to harvests and fire not shown.
28, more than twice the ratio considered desirable in most plants (Raison et al., 1993). Issues of particular concern over these and other Australian forests involve the sustainability of forest practices with respect to the long-term productive potential of the land, impacts on other biota and the possibility that intensively managed plantations could provide alternative fibre sources, relieving pressures to harvest native forests.
2. Model description The model is designed to project the growth and interaction of the overstorey and understorey as restricted by available light and water and the cycling of nutrients over repeated plantation rotations. For simplicity, I assume constant weather conditions and relate growth processes to climate. Ignoring the diurnal cycle of water use and photosynthesis and seasonal phenology limits the model's capacity to assess how extreme weather conditions affect the plantation cycle, but reduces the simulation time by several orders of magnitude. I first describe how the model represents biomass production of the overstorey as limited by water and nitrogen, the allocation of biomass and nitrogen between tree parts, and soil nitrogen dynamics. The additional features of juvenile
D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203
foliage, understorey growth and phosphorus dynamics are then appended to the base model. 2.1. Biomass production
McMurtrie and Wolf (1983a) and McMurtrie (1985) have developed simple forest models based on the observation that the production of a given species at a given site with adequate water is proportional to the integrated canopy light absorption (Linder and Rook, 1984; Cannell et al., 1987). This approach is followed here with the inclusion of multiplicative factors accounting for the effects of foliar nutrition, water limitation and stand age on the efficiency with which light energy is converted into biomass. Thus, G = I(F) E(nf) W(I)A(age)Gm, x
(1)
Here I is the fraction of incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by the canopy (dependent on foliar biomass F); E is a multiplier indicating the dependence of production on foliar nitrogen concentration (n f) normalized with respect to the production of a canopy with adequate nitrogen; W is a multiplier, ranging from 0 to 1 and dependent on I, accounting for the effects of water deficits on annual production; A is a multiplier (0 to 1), representing the decline in productivity as stands age after canopy closure; and Gma× is the potential productivity of a young stand with adequate water and nitrogen that absorbs all incident light. The value of Gmax and the exact functional form of its multipliers will vary between sites and species. Following McMurtrie (1985,1991), a Beer's law formulation of light absorbtion is assumed: I = 1 - exp(-k~rF)
(2)
where k, cr and F represent the light extinction coefficient, specific leaf area (one-sided leaf a r e a / l e a f biomass) and canopy foliage biomass per unit ground area, respectively. The photosynthetic capacity of plants generally increases with foliar N concentration, as N is involved in the synthesis of the carboxylation enzymes which limit the rate at which carbon can be fixed (Field and Mooney, 1986). Thus, E is expected to increase with foliar N concentration,
183
although its N dependence differs from photosynthetic capacity as only part of the canopy is light saturated at a given time. Kirschbaum et al. (1994) used year-long simulations of the mechanistic canopy photosynthesis model M A E S T R O (Wang and Jarvis, 1990) for Pinus radiata to express E as a rectangular hyperbolic function of nf. Here I assume a simpler power function relationship, given as E = (nf/no) c E= 1
if He < F/o
(3)
if n f > n o
where n o is the foliar nitrogen concentration above which production efficiency no longer increases with n and the exponent c is expected to lie between 0 and 1. Water deficits are expected to reduce production during those periods when soil moisture limits photosynthesis, particularly on sites where potential annual evapotranspiration exceeds annual precipitation. Because evapotranspiration increases with canopy cover and light interception, periods of soil water deficit will increase in frequency and duration with increasing canopy light interception at a given site. Thus, it is assumed that annual production is proportional to annual light interception for sparse canopies where evapotranspiration is too low to produce substantial water deficits, while production is completely limited by water for closed canopies (Tanner and Sinclair, 1983; McMurtrie et al., 1990). This water effect is modelled by modifying the above normalized production efficiency coefficient by a waterrelated multiplier which decreases below 1 as light absorption increases above some threshold fraction, i.e. W=I W=O.5(I+a)/l W=b/I