A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of southeastern Australia

A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of southeastern Australia

E(OLOGHL mODELLInG ELSEVIER Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203 A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of south...

2MB Sizes 2 Downloads 43 Views

E(OLOGHL mODELLInG ELSEVIER

Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

A model to evaluate factors controlling growth in Eucalyptus plantations of southeastern Australia David A. King 1 School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S. ~ 2033, Australia

Received 12 April 1994; accepted 8 February 1995

Abstract

A process model of Eucalyptus plantation growth was developed, including limitation of growth by nitrogen and phosphorus, understorey competition for water and nutrients and the occurrence of juvenile foliage in young eucalypts. The model considers plant, litter and soil nutrient cycles and can thus make long-term projections of the impacts of nutrient removal associated with different management practices. The model was parameterized for Eucalyptus sieberi forests in East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia, growing on very phosphorus-deficient soils. Model results suggest that: (1) The presence of juvenile foliage, with high specific leaf area, greatly increases growth rates during the early exponential growth phase. However, wood accumulation increases little in mature forests because the productivity of the adult canopy is not affected by the juvenile phase. (2) Understorey competition for water and nutrients causes a decrease in overstorey growth, but has a smaller effect on long-term wood production, due to feedbacks between production and the removal of nutrients in harvested wood. (3) The use of short rotation cycles would cause soil P stores and productivity to decline, although this decline may not be noticeable over the first century. The predicted rotation length required to maintain long-term productivity is inversely related to the rate of atmospheric deposition of P. (4) Application of phosphorus is projected to increase production, but only if nitrogen inputs are also increased to prevent the latter from becoming limiting in later rotations. As there are uncertainties in some of the model parameters, these projections should be viewed as relative effects, rather than site-specific predictions. Keywords: Eucalyptus; Forest ecosystems; Growth, plant; Nitrogen; Phosphorus

I. Introduction

Foresters generally use empirical functions to predict the growth of a given species within a

1 Present address: Ecosystem Dynamics Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia.

region. This empirical a p p r o a c h may provide adequate growth estimates so long as environmental and soil conditions remain similar to the historical n o r m used to derive the growth functions. M o r e recently developed process-based simulation models provide an integrated u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the biological controls of growth. Process m o d els have b e e n used to evaluate the environmental factors limiting p r o d u c t i o n (e.g. M c M u r t r i e et al.,

0304-3800/96/$15.00 © 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI 0304-3800(95)6028-3

182

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

1990), the impacts of management practices on long-term productive potential (Kimmins, 1977; Aber et al., 1982; Sachs and Sollins, 1986), and predict the likely impacts of global change on forest growth and carbon storage (Pastor and Post, 1988; Comins and McMurtrie, 1993; Kirschbaum et al., 1994). However, such models are generally difficult to construct and parameterize because the processes controlling growth span a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. This paper presents a rather simple process model of the growth of even-aged Eucalyptus forests. The model includes a number of features of importance in Australian eucalypt forests, including phosphorus limitation of growth, understorey competition for water and nutrients and the occurrence of juvenile foliage which may enhance growth of young eucalypt stands (Beadle et al., 1989). The model employs an integrated representation of the processes of photosynthesis and respiration by calculating the annual conversion of light energy into net biomass gain as influenced by foliar nutrient status, water limitation and stand age. The nutrient concentrations of foliage and other tissues are determined from calculations of nutrient uptake and retranslocation from senescing tissues, as diluted by new biomass production. The model tracks the major nutrient fluxes and cycles (shown in Fig. 1), and can thus estimate the long-term impacts of different management practices on soil nutrient contents and productivity. However, the model does not include such factors as soil compaction and erosion, which may vary with the type of machinery used in logging, and includes a number of uncertainties and approximations. Thus, the results should be viewed as indicating the relative size of different management impacts on production, rather than as specific growth projections. The model was parameterized for Eucalyptus sieberi L. Johnson forests in East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia, where studies of soil and foliar nutrient status and productivity have been carried out by the CSIRO Division of Forestry in Canberra and the Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (Raison et al., 1991,1993). These forests are very deficient in phosphorus as indicated by a foliar N / P ratio of

> N E P transfers ---- - -> Additional P transfers

f~ Overstorey] Ce~°~ iPi h ~ .

ching I

,'~-~ Understoreyh ~

1 I

.~

i i oo ,.,e.i

/~/

I LabilePl~--~

I°rganicmatterl I°rganicmatterl

,

L

j

J

Fig. 1. Major state variables and nutrient cycles considered in the model. Periodic nutrient losses due to harvests and fire not shown.

28, more than twice the ratio considered desirable in most plants (Raison et al., 1993). Issues of particular concern over these and other Australian forests involve the sustainability of forest practices with respect to the long-term productive potential of the land, impacts on other biota and the possibility that intensively managed plantations could provide alternative fibre sources, relieving pressures to harvest native forests.

2. Model description The model is designed to project the growth and interaction of the overstorey and understorey as restricted by available light and water and the cycling of nutrients over repeated plantation rotations. For simplicity, I assume constant weather conditions and relate growth processes to climate. Ignoring the diurnal cycle of water use and photosynthesis and seasonal phenology limits the model's capacity to assess how extreme weather conditions affect the plantation cycle, but reduces the simulation time by several orders of magnitude. I first describe how the model represents biomass production of the overstorey as limited by water and nitrogen, the allocation of biomass and nitrogen between tree parts, and soil nitrogen dynamics. The additional features of juvenile

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

foliage, understorey growth and phosphorus dynamics are then appended to the base model. 2.1. Biomass production

McMurtrie and Wolf (1983a) and McMurtrie (1985) have developed simple forest models based on the observation that the production of a given species at a given site with adequate water is proportional to the integrated canopy light absorption (Linder and Rook, 1984; Cannell et al., 1987). This approach is followed here with the inclusion of multiplicative factors accounting for the effects of foliar nutrition, water limitation and stand age on the efficiency with which light energy is converted into biomass. Thus, G = I(F) E(nf) W(I)A(age)Gm, x

(1)

Here I is the fraction of incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by the canopy (dependent on foliar biomass F); E is a multiplier indicating the dependence of production on foliar nitrogen concentration (n f) normalized with respect to the production of a canopy with adequate nitrogen; W is a multiplier, ranging from 0 to 1 and dependent on I, accounting for the effects of water deficits on annual production; A is a multiplier (0 to 1), representing the decline in productivity as stands age after canopy closure; and Gma× is the potential productivity of a young stand with adequate water and nitrogen that absorbs all incident light. The value of Gmax and the exact functional form of its multipliers will vary between sites and species. Following McMurtrie (1985,1991), a Beer's law formulation of light absorbtion is assumed: I = 1 - exp(-k~rF)

(2)

where k, cr and F represent the light extinction coefficient, specific leaf area (one-sided leaf a r e a / l e a f biomass) and canopy foliage biomass per unit ground area, respectively. The photosynthetic capacity of plants generally increases with foliar N concentration, as N is involved in the synthesis of the carboxylation enzymes which limit the rate at which carbon can be fixed (Field and Mooney, 1986). Thus, E is expected to increase with foliar N concentration,

183

although its N dependence differs from photosynthetic capacity as only part of the canopy is light saturated at a given time. Kirschbaum et al. (1994) used year-long simulations of the mechanistic canopy photosynthesis model M A E S T R O (Wang and Jarvis, 1990) for Pinus radiata to express E as a rectangular hyperbolic function of nf. Here I assume a simpler power function relationship, given as E = (nf/no) c E= 1

if He < F/o

(3)

if n f > n o

where n o is the foliar nitrogen concentration above which production efficiency no longer increases with n and the exponent c is expected to lie between 0 and 1. Water deficits are expected to reduce production during those periods when soil moisture limits photosynthesis, particularly on sites where potential annual evapotranspiration exceeds annual precipitation. Because evapotranspiration increases with canopy cover and light interception, periods of soil water deficit will increase in frequency and duration with increasing canopy light interception at a given site. Thus, it is assumed that annual production is proportional to annual light interception for sparse canopies where evapotranspiration is too low to produce substantial water deficits, while production is completely limited by water for closed canopies (Tanner and Sinclair, 1983; McMurtrie et al., 1990). This water effect is modelled by modifying the above normalized production efficiency coefficient by a waterrelated multiplier which decreases below 1 as light absorption increases above some threshold fraction, i.e. W=I W=O.5(I+a)/l W=b/I

ifI 2 b - a

(4)

where the coefficients a and b are specified for a given site based on the magnitude of water limitation of production in a typical year (with b > a). Production is proportional to I if I < a , and independent of I if I > (2b - a), as given by the substitution of Eq. 4 into Eq. 1 and shown in Fig. 2.

184

D.A. King~Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

old P i n u s contorta stands. Thus, the age-associated multiplier is given by

J

0.5/ j

J

J

t a,

o

A= 1 A = 0.5{1 + e x p [ - ca(age - ageo)]} I

o

if age < age o if age > age o

(5)

I

O.Ol

0,005

where age o is the age above which production efficiency begins to decline, and the constant c a indicates the rapidity of the decline. These parameters will again depend on species and site and are likely to be correlated with maximum tree age. The forms of the three multipliers for the E. sieberi stands of interest are shown in Fig. 2.

Foliar N concentration /

Wxl ~ J I

I

i

I

0.2

0.4

0,6

0,8

Fraction of light intercepted ( I )

2.2. G r o w t h o f tree p a r t s 1|

I~ -

I

I

I

c) A 0.5

0

0

I

I

I

I

20

4o

6o

so

i00

Stand Age (yrs)

Fig. 2. Multiplicative functions used to calculate production illustrated for an E. sieberi stand in East Gippsland, Victoria. The function E (panel a) indicates the assumed influence of foliar nitrogen concentration on light-use efficiency when growth is limited by nitrogen. The product of the water related multiplier W and I, the fraction of light intercepted by the total canopy (panel b) indicates the limitation of production by water deficits as intercepted light increases with increasing leaf area. The age multiplier A (panel c) indicates the assumed decline in light-use efficiency as stands age.

The conversion of light energy into biomass by forest stands also appears to decline as stands age, due to increased maintenance respiration of sapwood and phloem (Waring and Schlesinger, 1985) and a decline in photosynthetic rates which may be related to greater limitations to water transport in old trees (Ryan and Waring, 1992). This effect is approximated by assuming no agerelated declines until a time somewhat after canopy closure, after which the age-related multiplier declines exponentially from a value of 1 to 0.5 in very old stands, consistent with the Ryan (1991) production estimates for 40-and 245-year-

The overstorey trees are divided into the following four compartments: (1) foliage, (2) fine roots, (3) bark and twigs and (4) the remaining longer-lived parts, stem and branchwood and structural roots. These parts are updated at monthly intervals by the following difference equations: Ft+ l = Ft + a f G - l f F t Rt+ 1 = R t + arG - lrR t

Wt+ 1 = Wt + awG - l w Wt Bt+ 1 = B t + abG - lbB t

(6) (7) (8) (9)

where Ft, R t , B t and Wt represent foliage, fine roots, bark and twigs and the remaining woody biomass, respectively; af, ar, a b and a w are the corresponding coefficients denoting the allocation of the new biomass increment among the above parts, and If, lr, lb and I w denote the rate of shedding of the respective tree parts. The loss rate of woody biomass (/w) includes the effect of tree mortality on the live woody biomass. The allocation of biomass between different tissues may vary with foliar nitrogen concentration nf. Nutrient-deficient trees appear to allocate a greater fraction of carbon to fine roots than fertilized trees (Cannell, 1985), as was also predicted by a model of optimal allocation for competing trees (King, 1993). Thus, the ratio of fine root allocation to foliage allocation is as-

D,4. King / Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

185

sumed to increase as nf declines below the concentration at adequate nutrition (n o) as follows: a r = [2- 1.5nf/no]a f

if n e < n o

a r = 0,5af

if nf > n o

Allocation to foliage vs. other above-ground parts depends on plant age, size and canopy density. Allocation to foliage vs. stem is quite high in small seedlings and declines with increasing seedling size (Sands et al., 1992). In contrast, foliage allocation is lower in adult trees, but increases as stands age, partially compensating for the age-related decline in the total biomass production rate (Ryan, 1991). In addition, foliage allocation is likely to be higher in open grown trees bearing foliage over most of their length than in crowded trees, bearing foliage only near the top, i.e. foliage allocation may decline with increasing stand LAI for trees of a given age (West, 1993). These three factors are incorporated in the model by defining foliage allocation as follows: a f = (1 - a r ) [ c a + ( 0 . 8 3 - ca) ×exp(-0.4age)]A-°'6(1

- LAI/10)

Other woody parts

(10)

(11)

where (1 - a r ) C a is the fraction of new biomass allocated to foliage in widely spaced, intermediate-aged trees which have not yet started to decline in production efficiency. The term involving e x p ( - O . 4 a g e ) in Eq. 11 was chosen so that the modelled relationship between allocation and plant mass under typical field conditions agreed with that reported by Sands et al. (1992) for seedling E. grandis. The foliage allocation given by this term declines rapidly in the initial years of growth, and approaches a constant value by an age of 10 to 15 years, consistent with patterns reported for 2-to 12-year-old Pinus radiata stands by Beets and Pollock (1987a). The term A -°'6 produces an increase in foliage allocation in aging stands as the age-related light-use efficiency factor ( A ) declines, consistent with patterns reported by Ryan (1991). The coefficient describing allocation to bark and twigs, a o, was specified as a function of

O

Fine roots I

I 015

Foliar N concentration Fig. 3. Fractions of new biomass allocated to different overstorey tree parts calculated as a function of foliar N concentration when N limits growth, as modelled for a 20-year-old E. sieberi stand. Note that dynamic allocation of new biomass is shown here, which differs from the proportion of biomass in each component at any given time, due to differences among tissue turnover rates.

1--af--ar, as would be expected if bark and wood production are related. Based on the observation that nonfoliar litterfall, which is mostly bark and twigs, increases with stand age in young forests (Polglase and Attiwill, 1992), and is approximately equal to foliar litterfall in mature eucalypt forests (Keith, 1991; Raison et al., 1993), I assume that

a b = 0.1(1 + age~40)(1 - af a b = 0.2(1- a f - at)A-O"6

- -

ar)A-0.6

if age < 40 if age >__40

(12) The remaining portion of the biomass increment is then allocated to the other woody tissues, i.e. a w= 1 -

af -

ab- ar

(13)

The allocation coefficients for E. sieberi are shown in Fig. 3. The rates at which tree parts are lost (lf, lr, l b and lw) are assumed constant, as defined in the model application section. 2.3. Tissue N concentrations

The foliar N concentration is determined by balancing N inputs and losses from the trees and

186

D.A. King~Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

accounting for the relative N concentrations of the different tree parts. Total N content within the living trees is updated each month by the equation Nt+ 1 = N t + Nup - 0.5nfffF

- n b ( l b q- lw)B

- nrlrR - nwlwW

(14)

where Nup indicates the N taken up by the trees during the month, and n b, n r and n w are the N concentrations of the bark and twigs, fine roots and other woody parts, respectively. Eq. 14 is based on the assumption that 50% of N is retranslocated from senescing leaves (Keith, 1991; Crane and Banks, 1992), but that no retranslocation occurs from fine roots (Nambiar and Fife, 1991). The assumption that retranslocation occurs from foliage, but not from bark and twigs, is required to reconcile the observation that N concentrations in nonfoliar litterfall are almost as high as in foliar litterfall in E. sieberi forests (Raison et al., 1993) with the general observation that N concentrations in live bark and twigs are substantially lower than in live foliage (Frederick et al., 1985). Note that l w, the wood loss coefficient, is also applied to bark in Eq. 14, as trees are assumed to die with their bark on. Tissue N concentrations reported by Madgwick et al. (1977) and Beets and Pollock (1987b) for Pinus radiata on sites of varying fertility suggest that the N concentration of different tissues is proportional to foliar N concentration for trees of a given age. Thus, nf can be expressed in terms of total tree N content as nf = N / ( F

+ brnR + bbnB + bwnW )

(15)

where bin, bbn and bw. are the ratios of tissue N concentration to foliar N concentration for fine roots, bark and twigs, and other woody parts, respectively. I assume that b~n = 0.5 and bbn = 0.4, based on eucalypt nutrient concentrations reported by Kirschbaum et al. (1992) and Raison et al. (1993). However, woody tissue N concentrations decline as trees age, both before and after heartwood initiation, as given by the following equation, derived from E. regnans data (Frederick et al., 1985): bwn = 1/(5age + 1) + 0.025

(16)

2.4. Soil nitrogen dynamics The release of plant available nitrogen from litter and soil organic matter is derived from a simplification of the C E N T U R Y model of Parton et al. (1987) that only tracks N pools with a turnover time greater than one year. These include a dead wood N pool composed of fallen trunks and larger branches, a litter N pool receiving N inputs from senescing fine roots, foliage, bark and twigs, and N in the slow and passive soil organic matter pools of the C E N T U R Y model, with turnover times of 20-30 and 500-1000 years, respectively. The N transfer coefficients are based on net N losses from litter during the period of exponential decay reported by Aber et al. (1990) and soil organic matter (SOM) transfers derived from C E N T U R Y for forests approaching steady state nutrient cycling. Thus, the litter and soil N dynamics are given by Nmin = 0 . 2 K E N L + K s N s + KpNp

(17)

Nst+l = N s t + 0 . 9 6 ( 0 . 8 K L N L + K w L N w L )

-KsNst

(18)

N p t + 1 = N p t + 0"04(0"8KLNL + K w L N w L )

- KpNpt

(19)

NEt+ I =NEt + 0.5nflfF + nblbB + nrlr R -- K L N L t q- Nimmob

(20)

NWLt+ 1 = NWLt + nwlwW + nhlwB - KwLNwLt (21) where Nmin is the amount of N mineralized in a given model step and Nst, Npt, NWL t and NLt represent N in slow SOM, passive SOM, decaying trunks and branches, and the rest of above-and below-ground litter, respectively, and Ks, Kp, KWL and K L are the corresponding N loss coefficients associated with the decay or transformation of material in each of the previous pools. Nimmob represents plant available N not taken up in the previous timestep, due to low initial root biomass as defined by Eq. 29 below, which is put into the pool with the fastest turnover time, the litterpool.

D.A. lO'ng/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

N is often immobilized in decaying wood (Harmon et al., 1986). For simplicity, I assume in Eq. 21 that any N immobilized in woody litter comes from more decayed woody litter, so that all N initially entering this pool passes on to the other SOM pools where it is gradually mineralized. The assumption that 96% of non-mineralized N passing from the litter pools moves into the slow SOM pool, and 4% into the passive SOM pool (Eqs. 18 and 19) results in the two pools having similar sizes under steady state conditions, as is expected for forest soils (Attiwill and Leeper, 1987). Note also, that the N contributions to the litterpools in Eqs. 20 and 21 are equal to the N losses from live trees given by Eq. 14. The decay coefficients of Eqs. 17-21 are defined as functions of soil temperature and moisture following Parton et al. (1987). The decay coefficients for slow and passive SOM are reduced somewhat from those of Parton et al. (1987) because some of the N leaving these pools recycles back to them through the active microbial pool, a recycling loop omitted from this model. Thus, for a monthly time step, K e = act × w a t

(22)

K s = O.17act × wat

(23)

K p = O.O067act × w a t

(24)

KwL = K s

(25)

where the temperature dependence of the coefficients is given by act = 0.0326 + 0.00351T 1652 - 0.024T 7A9

(26)

where T is the mean annual temperature. This temperature is increased by up to 5°C, in proportion to the amount of light striking the forest floor, during the first few years of growth when high insolation heats the soil above air temperature and increases mineralization rates (Raison et al., 1993). The soil moisture factor, w a t , is 1 for moist, well-drained soils, and declines with increasing occurrence of droughts, w a t is equal to 0.75 for the region of interest, as calculated in terms of precipitation vs. potential evaporation by Parton et al. (1987).

187

The forest nitrogen uptake Nup of Eq. 14 may then be defined as Nup = (1 - LN) (Nmi n + Ndep)

(27)

where L N is that small fraction of available N lost through gaseous emission or leaching and Nde o represents atmospheric deposition. For very young stands with low root biomass, I assume that N uptake is given by the following quadratic function of fine root biomass Uupyoung = (2 R / 0 . 1 5 ) ( 1 - R / 0 . 3 ) Nup

if R < 0.15 kg m -2

(28)

and that the remaining N added to the litter pool in Eq. 20 is given by Nimmo b = Nup - Nupyoung

(29)

The above reduction in young stand uptake prevents the occurrence of unrealistically high tissue N concentrations initially, but has little impact on subsequent forest dynamics. 2.5. Juvenile foliage

A striking feature of many eucalypt species is the occurrence of juvenile leaves which are generally thinner and sometimes held at a shallower angle to the vertical than adult leaves. As seedlings and saplings age, a progression of leaf morphs are produced from juvenile through intermediate to adult (Boland et al., 1984). Thus, the mean specific leaf area of the stand should decrease over the first few years, with the length of this transition period varying between species and populations within a species (Beadle et al., 1989), i.e., O'ju v = O'initia I -- ( a g e / d u r )

for age < dur

( O'initia I -- o r )

(30)

where dur represents the stand age at which the transition to adult foliage is complete and o- and O'initiaI denote the specific leaf area of adult leaves and the first appearing juvenile leaves, respectively. Eq. 30 is then substituted into Eq. 2 for this early growth stage. The occurrence of juvenile foliage may also influence the value of n o, the foliar nitrogen

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

188

concentration at which nitrogen no longer limits growth, as thin juvenile leaves of a given nitrogen concentration have less nitrogen per unit area than adult leaves of the same nf value. The photosynthetic capacity of seedling Eucalyptus leaves continues to increase with nf for nitrogen concentrations substantially higher than those observed in adult leaves of fertilized stands (Sands et al., 1992). Hence I assume that the nongrowth-limiting nitrogen concentration during the juvenile stage is given by

nojuv =

n o

(31)

2.6. Understorey Forest understories may include a variety of life forms. Ferns, grasses and shrubs are common in the understories of the eucalypt forests considered here and are modelled as a lumped component with averaged allocation and leaf characteristics. The understorey absorbs additional light, thereby increasing the water limitation of the whole ecosystem, and competes with the overstorey for nutrients (McMurtrie and Wolf, 1983b). The understorey production is defined in an analogous fashion to the overstorey production (given by Eq. 1) as G u =Iu(Fu,F)Eu(nu)W(Itot)Gumax

(32)

where the subscript u indicates that the variables are now defined for the understorey. No ageing effects are included in the understorey whose stems turn over more quickly than in the overstorey and the factor W denoting water limitation of production in both Eqs. 1 and 32 is now expressed as a function of total fractional light absorption by the overstorey and understorey in Eq. 4. Light absorbed by the understorey, Iu, is calculated as a fraction of total light passing through the overstorey and incident on the understorey, luin, as I u = Iuin[1 - e x p ( - kuo-uF~) ]

(33)

where /uin ~ 1 -- I . The understorey plant parts Fu, R u and Wu are then defined as in Eqs. 6-8 for the over-

storey, but with twigs and bark included in the woody component. Understorey fine root allocation is given by a u r = [ 2 -- 1 . 5 n u f / n u o ] a u f

aur

= 0.5auf

if h u e < n u o if nuf > nuo

(34)

and understorey foliage allocation is given by auf = 0.5(1 - ar)Cua[1 + exp( -- 3Iuin) ] × (1 - L A I n / 1 0 )

(35)

where (1 - a r ) C u a represents the fraction of new biomass allocated to foliage in a very sparse, heavily shaded understorey. The term including e x p ( - 3 / u i n) accounts for the shift in allocation from stems to leaves with increasing shade observed in understorey saplings (King, 1991,1994) and the decline in foliar allocation with increasing understorey LAI is similar to that assumed for the overstorey. The remaining fraction of growth is then allocated to woody tissues, which include petioles and rhizomes in the case of herbs. In addition, the understorey specific leaf area o-u is related to the fraction of total light passing through the overstorey and incident on the understorey, Iuin, as follows: tru = truoeXp(-Iuin)

(36)

where truo is the specific leaf area of a heavily shaded understorey. The rationale for this approach is that shade-tolerant species generally shift their morphologies in response to ambient light level, with shade-grown foliage having a higher specific leaf area than sun-grown foliage (Smith, 1991; Lowman, 1992). A brief period of juvenile foliage is included for the understorey, as seedling leaves are generally thinner than adult foliage. I assume that o-uo declines linearly with time from twice the adult value at stand initiation, and attains the adult value after 2 years. The N content of the understorey is then given by Nut+l

= N u t + N u p u - 0 . 5 n u l f u F u - nrulruR u -

nwulwuWu

(37)

which is analogous to Eq. 14 for the overstorey. However, N uptake is now divided between the

189

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

overstorey and the understorey in proportion to their relative root biomasses, i.e., Nupu = N u p R J ( R + Ru)

(38)

Nup o = N u p R / ( R + Ru)

(39)

where Eq. 39 now replaces Eq. 27 for the overstorey N uptake. The understorey tissue N concentrations are then defined analogously to those for the overstorey (Eqs. 15 and 16) except that the ratio of woody tissue [N] to foliar IN] is given by bwnu = 0.3, i.e., the understorey woody tissue [N] does not decline over time because the understorey ramets are shorter-lived and replaced by younger ramets. Finally, N contained in senescing understorey parts is incorporated in Eq. 20 for litter N content to close the nitrogen cycle. 2.7. Phosphorus dynamics and limitation of production The consideration of phosphorus cycling is particularly important for Australian soils which are old and often derived from P-deficient substrates (Attiwill and Leeper, 1987). Although phosphorus is essential for a variety of physiological processes, the functional relationships between these processes and tissue P concentration are not as well understood as they are for N. Sands et al. (1992) found that the growth of E. grandis seedlings limited by P could be modelled with rather similar photosynthetic efficiency relationships to those used for N limitation. Hence, in calculating production, I define a generalized nutrient limitation factor analogous to Eq. 3: ,

c

g=(nf/n°) E = 1

if n f < n ° if n f > n o

(40)

where n f = Cp )


if p f < nf/Cp

and n~' = nf

if pf ~_~nf/Cp

Here Cp is the foliar N / P ratio above which P is considered to be more limiting than N, pf is the foliar P concentration and c is the constant defined in Eq. 3. Fine root allocation a r is also

related to nr* using an equation similar to Eq. 10. (Note that analogous relationships apply to the understorey in these and the following expressions for P dynamics.) Tree P content is simulated using a difference equation similar to Eq. 14 describing N dynamics, except that a larger fraction of P is retranslocated from senescing above-ground tissue (Raison et al., 1993), i.e.,

Pt +1 = Pt + Pup - 0 . 3 5 p f l f F - P b( lb + lw)B - p r l r R -Pwlw W

(41)

The foliar P concentration is then given by

pf = e / ( F + brpR + bbpB + bwpW )

(42)

where brp = 1.8br,, bwp= 1.8bwn a n d bbp= 1.2bbn, i.e., the ratios of a given tree part [P] to foliar [P] are 1.8 X the corresponding ratios for nitrogen (Kirschbaum et al., 1992), except for the case of bark and twigs where the factor 1.2 is required to provide agreement with the P vs. N concentrations in nonfoliar litterfall reported by Raison et al. (1993). Difference equations for P contents of litter and slow and passive pool dynamics are similar to those for N, as given by Eqs. 17-21. P release in organic matter decomposition is given by Pmin = 0"2KLPL + g s e s 'j- g p e p

(43)

and the total P available for plant uptake (in competition with other soil components) by Pavait = (1 --Lp)(Pmi n + Pdep)

(44)

cf. Eqs. 17 and 27. The portion of the above available P taken up by plants, eupmin, is then calculated as a rectangular hyperbolic function of total understorey plus overstorey fine root biomass (Rtot): Pupmin = eavail X R t o t / ( Rto t -k- Mmin)

(45)

where Minin is the half-saturation root biomass at which roots take up half of the mineralized P, the rest being fixed to the soil. Thus, the value of Mmin specifies the relative affinity of soil vs. roots for mineral P. However, trees also have the capacity to take up inorganic P that is fixed to soil particles. This

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

190

fixed P includes loosely h e l d c o m p o n e n t s that can be r e m o v e d by mild c h e m i c a l r e a g e n t s a n d c r o p

m o r e t i g h t l y f i x e d P in i r o n - a n d a l u m i n u m - b o u n d f o r m s w h i c h h a v e b e e n r e p o r t e d as P s o u r c e s f o r

plants adapted

to p h o s p h o r u s - r i c h , glacially de-

Eucalyptus ( M u l l e t t e a n d E l l i o t t , 1974). T h u s , I

r i v e d soils o f t h e n o r t h e r n h e m i s p h e r e , as w e l l as

include two additional pools composed of labile

Table 1 Definition of model parameters and their values for E. sieberi forests in East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia Parameter

Definition

Value

no

critical foliar N concentration above which N no longer limits production for overstorey critical foliar N concentration for understorey exponent defining production efficiency as a power function of foliar N concentration in Eq. 3 foliar N / P ratio above which production is considered to be limited by phosphorus light extinction coefficient for overstorey light extinction coefficient for understorey parameters defining water limitation of production as a function of absorbed light in Eq. 4 age at which overstorey light-use efficiency starts to decline coefficient indicating rate of decline of light-use efficiency with increasing age in Eq. 5 loss coefficients for overstorey foliage, fine roots, bark and twigs, and stemwood and large branches loss coefficients for understorey foliage, fine roots and woody biomass foliar allocation coefficient for overstorey foliar allocation coefficient for understorey specific leaf area of overstorey initial specific leaf area of overstorey seedlings specific leaf area of understorey in full shade age by which overstorey has completely shifted to adult foliage potential maximum biomass production rate for young overstorey canopy, not limited by water or nutrients that absorbs all incident light corresponding potential maximum production rate for understorey atmospheric N deposition atmospheric P deposition fraction of mineralized N lost from the system fraction of mineralized P lost from the system half-saturation root biomass at which roots take up half the mineralized P, the rest fixed to soil theoretical maximum labile P uptake rate per unit labile P by a very dense root system corresponding maximum rate per unit inorganic P half-saturation root biomass for labile P uptake half-saturation root biomass for inorganic P uptake rate at which labile P shifts to inorganic pool rate at which inorganic P shifts to labile pool

0.012 g N g 1 biomass

nuo c Cp k

kuo a, b

ageo Cd lf, lr, lb, l w luf, lur, luw

Ca Cua O" O'initial Cruo

dur Gmax

Gumax Ndep

Pdep LN Lp

Mmin gmax|ab rma×inorg Mlab Minorg glab ginorg

0.016 g N g - 1 biomass 0.4 20 0.5 0.7 0.65, 0.75 20 yrs 0.015 yr- l 0.5, 1, 0.08, 0.01 yr x 0.667, 1, 0.2yr -1 0.23 0.5 4.5 m 2 kg-1 13.5 m 2 kg ~ 14 m 2 kg- x 4 yr 4.4kgm e y r i

3.3kgm 2yr 1 0 . 4 g m 2yr l O.O16gm 2 y r - I 0.01 0.005 0.2 kg m -2 0.3 yr 1 0.03 yr- x 0.2 kg m -2 lkgm 2 0.3 yr -1 0.003 yr- 1

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

and nonlabile inorganic P. Plant uptake from the labile pool is estimated with the following rectangular hyperbolic function: Puptab = Vmaxlab X Piab X R t o t / ( mlab + R t o t )

Pupinorg = VmaxinorgX Pinorg X Rtot/(Minor . + Rtot) (47) where the parameter definitions are completely analogous to those describing labile P uptake. (Because tightly bound P that is solubilized by root exudates may be rapidly taken up by the adjacent roots, I model the transfer of inorganic P to the plant as a single step, rather than as inorganic P ~ labile P ~ plant.) Total plant uptake of P is then (48)

This uptake and its components are then reduced as the foliar N / P ratio declines below Cp, consistent with observations of decreased P uptake in excised roots of fertilized eucalypt saplings (Raison et al., 1993). The labile and inorganic P pool dynamics are expressed as Plabt +1 = Plabt + KinorgPinorg - Klab ]91abt + Pavail -- Pupmin - Puplab

(49)

Pinorgt+ 1 = Pinorgt + KlabPlab -- KinorgPinorgt

- Pup,°o g

Kla b is set equal to a value much greater than

Kinorg, so that Pinorg >> Plab, as is observed (Attiwill and Leeper, 1987).

(46)

where MI~b is the half-saturation fine root biomass for taking up labile P, Plab is the size of the labile P pool and Vm~xl~b is the theoretical maximum labile P uptake rate per unit labile P for a very dense rooting system. P uptake from the more tightly bound nonlabile inorganic P pool is given by

Pup = Pupmin q- Pupl,b + Pu0i.o,g

191

(50)

where KI~b and K~no~g indicate the rates at which P is transferred from the labile to the inorganic pool and vice versa. I assume that all available mineralized P not taken up directly by plants initially enters the labile pool and moves subsequently into the inorganic pool, consistent with the observation that P moves much more quickly into the labile pool but is more tightly bound in the inorganic pool (Attiwill and Leeper, 1987).

2.8. Model application

The model was applied to forests dominated by E. sieberi in East Gippsland, in the region between Orbost and Cann River, Victoria, Australia (37°40'S, 148°45'E). These forests are located on infertile sandy gradational and duplex soils which are particularly deficient in phosphorus. The parameter values shown in Table 1 were derived from characteristics reported for other eucalypt forests and from descriptions of the above East Gippsland forests by Raison et al. (1991,1993). The critical foliar nitrogen concentration, no, indicating an adequate nutrient supply may be taken as the mean foliar N concentration, nf, of canopies on particularly fertile sites (McMurtrie, 1991). Values of nf of 0.017 g N g - l dry mass were reported for very productive E. regnans plantations grown on fertile soils in New Zealand (Frederick et al., 1985). However, E. sieberi typically grows on much less fertile sites than E. regnans Boland et al., 1984) and species adapted to less fertile sites generally have lower nutrient requirements for growth (Pastor and Post, 1986). Thus, n o was set equal to 0.012 for E. sieberi, considerably higher than the observed value of 0.009 in the East Gippsland forests. The critical nitrogen concentration for the understorey vegetation was set at a somewhat higher value (Table 1), as the typical understorey of ferns, grasses and shrubs is thinner leaved than the eucalypt overstorey. Foliar nitrogen concentration per unit biomass generally increases as specific leaf area increases (Reich et al., 1992). The exponent c relating production efficiency to foliar nitrogen concentration was set equal to the rather low value of 0.4, as production may be less sensitive to foliar nitrogen concentration when it is limited by water during part of the year (Thompson and Wheeler, 1992), as is the case for the forests under consideration here. The parameter Cp, the foliar N / P ratio, above which phos-

192

D.A. King~Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

phorus limits growth was set equal to 20, twice the value chosen by Sands et al. (1992) in describing the influence of phosphorus vs. nitrogen on the specific leaf area of E. grandis seedlings. However, the latter species commonly occurs on fertile sites. The fact that very productive E. regnans plantations on a fertile site at New Zealand (Frederick et al., 1985) had a foliar N / P ratio of 13, while the stands modelled here had a foliar N / P ratio of 28 and responded strongly to P fertilization (Raison et al., 1993), supports the above choice for cp. The light extinction coefficient depends on leaf orientation, foliage distribution and light angles integrated over the year. Mature E. sieberi foliage, which is held at a near-vertical angle will have a low light extinction coefficient for vertical light and a much higher extinction coefficient for low angles of incident light as occur early and late in the day and during winter. The annual light extinction coefficient used here was set equal to 0.5, as has been used in other eucalypt models (Sands et al., 1992; West, 1993). The understorey light extinction coefficient was set at a somewhat higher value (Table 1), as it has a more horizontal leaf orientation than the overstorey. The parameters defining water limitation of production were set such that the production predicted for a canopy intercepting all light would be 0.75 × that for the non-water-stressed case, approximately equal to the ratio of annual precipitation to pan evaporation for the region of interest (Commonwealth of Australia, 1986). The parameters describing aging effects on production efficiency (age n and c d of Table 1) were chosen to be consistent with the empirical yield model STANDSIM for E. sieberi (John Coleman, CSIRO Division of Forestry, pers. commun.; Campbell et al., 1979). The loss coefficients for different tissues were based on eucalypt leaf lifespans of Keith (1991) and West (1993), the ratio of bark to wood P content given by Attiwill and Leeper (1987) (which is affected by the bark loss rate) and stem volume loss rates reported for temperate species by Harmon et al. (1993). The specific leaf area of understorey leaves, and the parameters describing the specific leaf area of juvenile and adult overstorey leaves were based

on measured patterns in East Gippsland (King, unpublished data). The potential maximum production rate for an overstorey, not limited by nutrients and water that intercepted all light, was then set equal to a value such that the calibrated model would approximate the observed foliage litter production and expected wood production by forests in the area of interest. The potential maximum production rate for the understorey was set to 3 / 4 of the overstorey value, as the understorey receives a greater fraction of its light during times when the sun is high and less blocked by steeply angled eucalypt leaves, which is also a time of greater limitation of photosynthesis by water deficits. The atmospheric N and P deposition rates were set equal to the rather low values of 0.4 and 0.016 g m -2 yr -1, respectively, based on values reported for a few widely scattered sites in Eastern Australia (Feller, 1981; Raison et al., 1985; Attiwill and Leeper, 1987). The fractions of mineralized N and P lost from the system were set equal to 0.01 and 0.005, respectively, as mineralized P may be more tightly bound to the soil than mineralized N. The last 7 parameters of Table 1, specifying phosphorus dynamics, were adjusted to be consistent with reported interactions between phosphorus and soil components (e.g. Attiwill and Leeper, 1987), the tissue P concentrations reported by Raison et al. (1991,1993) and the assumption that soil P pools are approaching equilibrium in oldgrowth forests. Thus, the maximum uptake rate of labile P by roots (Vm~ab) was set equal to 10 × the maximum uptake rate of the more tightly bound, less mobile inorganic P pool and Klab, defining the rate of P movement from the labile to the inorganic P pool was set equal to 100 x ginorg , the parameter defining the reverse flow between these pools. The half-saturation root biomass for uptake of mineralized P was set equal to 0.2 kg m -2, resulting in the prediction that old forests take up about 2 / 3 of the mineralized P directly, with the rest of the mineral P moving first to the labile and then to the inorganic pool, with plant uptake from these latter pools maintaining them at equilibrium. The coefficient Minorg, the half-saturation root biomass

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203 Table 2 Initial values of the state variables Variable

Definition

Initial value (g m 2)

F R B W

Overstorey foliage dry mass Overstorey fine root dry mass Overstorey bark dry mass Overstorey woody dry mass Understorey foliage dry mass Understorey fine root dry mass Understorey woody dry mass Slow organic matter nitrogen Passive organic matter nitrogen Fine litter nitrogen Woody litter nitrogen Slow organic phosphorus Passive organic phosphorus Fine litter phosphorus Woody litter phosphorus Labile phosphorus Inorganic phosphorus

0.0036 0.0036 0.00016 0.00064 2 2 2 100 100 31 10 5 5 1.1 0.6 0.8 5

Fu Ru

Wu Us Np NL

NWL Ps

PP PL

PWL Plab Pinorg

The live components are reset to the initial values shown here after every rotation, while the other components continue on their respective trajectories. Pinorg includes that portion of the total inorganic P that could be eventually solubilized and taken up by plants adapted to P-deficient soils, i.e. it does not include occluded P which is completely removed from circulation. The initial value for Plab is substantially higher than during midrotation due to the release of labile P by the initial slash burn.

193

woody litter for a 100-year interval, followed by the nutrient losses and transfers associated with a postharvest slash burn, as described below. Thus, it is assumed that a mature forest had been harvested and the remaining debris burned before the sowing of seed, as is typically done in regenerating eucalypts (Cremer et al., 1978). Multiple rotations were then simulated for several alternative management practices. Based on the transfer of nutrients to the atmosphere in control burns of litter and understorey vegetation reported by Raison et al. (1985), I assumed that postharvest regeneration fires remove 60% of the N content and 40% of the P content of the remaining debris after harvest, with the remaining N entering the litter pool and the remaining P entering the labile P pool. The burnt debris was assumed to include all overstorey bark, twigs and leaves not removed at harvest and the aboveground understorey and fine litter. The simulations also assume that 80% of the total live woody tissue is harvested, approximating the case where all stem and large branch wood is removed, but not stumps and structural and coarse roots.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. General patterns

for inorganic P uptake was set to the higher value of 1 kg m -2 as this component of uptake is dependent on solubilization of P by root exudates (Gardner et al., 1983), and may therefore increase with increasing root density until the entire bulk soil lies within the chemically altered rhizosphere. In the simulations that follow, the initial overstorey foliar biomass was set equal to 0.0036 g m-2, as estimated for newly germinated E. sieberi seedlings at a typical replanting density of 2 seedlings m -2. The initial understorey foliar biomass was set equal to 2 g m -2 based on the existence of stored reserves in those herbaceous understorey plants which resprout from underground rhizomes after disturbance. The initial values for the soil and litter nutrient pools, shown in Table 2, were determined from Raison et al. (1991) and by simulating the build up of fine and

The predicted foliar N / P ratio of 28 for a 100-year-old stand was equal to that observed in old, uneven-aged E. sieberi forests in the OrbostCann River region of Victoria (Table 3). The modelled foliar nutrient concentrations were

Table 3 Foliage characteristics of a modelled E. sieberi stand in East Gippsland, Victoria, as compared to observed characteristics

Observed Modelled

Foliage prod. (kgm - 2 y r - t )

Foliar [N] (mgg 1)

Foliar [P] (mgg-1)

2.5 2.7

8.9 10.7

0.32 0.38

The values for the observed stand are average values for two uneven-aged stands growing on duplex and gradational soils, respectively, reported by Raison et al. (1993). Values for the even-aged modelled stand are for an age of 100 years.

D.A. King / Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

194

somewhat greater than observed, due in part to repeated wildfires in the Orbost-Cann River region, which would cause greater nutrient losses and lower foliar nutrient concentrations than for the modelled case of no mid-rotation fires. The trajectories of overstorey and understorey leaf area index (LAI) for a 120-year rotation (Fig. 4a) indicate an interaction between these two layers, with understorey LAI increasing somewhat as the overstorey LAI declines in old stands. This interaction results in negligible change over time in the total fraction of light intercepted by both layers after stand closure. The pattern of accumulation of standing wood biomass over the rotation (Fig. 4a) is generally similar to the accumulation of standing wood biomass predicted by empirical models for Eucalyptus species (West and Mattay, 1993). The predicted net annual wood production declines with time (Fig. 5) due to the assumed age-related decline in production efficiency and the increase in wood lost to mortality with increasing stand

a) wood

3O

2O

E t~

oE

f]°0 i

b)

° a5

E

"6 ~ o8

i ine

-~ 04

~o2 ~

o

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

Stand age (yrs)

Fig. 5. Predicted annual overstorey wood production vs. stand age for an E. sieberi stand in East Gippsland, Victoria. Gross wood production includes all new wood in stems and larger branches (excluding bark) produced over the year. Net wood production is the net annual increase in standing wood dry mass in the stem and larger branches after subtraction of losses due to mortality.

biomass. The net wood production rate peaks at a somewhat earlier age than that indicated by the empirical yield model STANDSIM (John Coleman, CSIRO Division of Forestry, pers. commun.; Campbell et al., 1979). This difference is due in part to my assumption that mortality is a constant fraction of standing wood biomass throughout the rotation, rather than the more complex function of stand age and stem cross sectional area used in STANDSIM. Omission of the understorey from the model results in more rapid initial development of overstorey leaf area and greater wood production over the rotation (Fig. 4b) because more water and nutrients are then available to the overstorey.

I ~°

3.2. Influence of juvenile foliage on forest growth

0

o

~o

20

30

40

5O

60

70

e0

9O

100

110

~20

Stand age (yrs) Fig. 4. Predicted overstorey (heavy line) and understorey (light line) leaf area index and standing overstorey wood biomass plotted as a function of stand age, with and without an understorey (panels a and b, respectively), for E. sieberi in East Oippsland, Victoria.

Changing the length of time involved in shifting from the initial juvenile foliage to adult foliage had a strong impact on stand dynamics (Fig. 6), with a more prolonged juvenile period increasing the initial overstorey leaf area and growth rate and slowing the early growth of the understorey. Because juvenile leaves have greater specific leaf area than adult leaves, seedlings are able to intercept more light per unit foliage mass. The effect of this enhanced light interception is

D.A. King/ Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

magnified in the early exponential phase of growth when a modest increase in the relative growth rate has a large effect on accumulated biomass. Omission of the juvenile stage greatly slowed the development of the overstorey (Fig. 6), due in part to compensatory growth and nutrient uptake by the understorey (Table 4). Thus, juvenile foliage is important in the regeneration of eucalypts after fire or other disturbances. Juvenile foliage is considered to be a primitive, ancestral character of the eucalypts (Pryor, 1976), which

195

Table 4 Impact of the length of the juvenile foliage phase on modelled wood production. Length of the juvenile phase is the time required to shift entirely to adult foliage Length of juvenile phase (yrs) 0 4 8 Case of no understorey 0 4 8

Standing above-ground wood 2) after

biomass (kg m 4 yrs

40 yrs

0.034 0.69 1.06

27.0 31.2 32.4

0.10 1.13 1.45

34.4 36.6 36.7

a)

b)

E

4

wood

c) is "i -

i[

2

j.oo0

a

1

2

3

a

5

6

r

a

9 10 11 12 ~3

14

15

18

l

~r ~s 1~ 2O

may have been retained for its role in promoting rapid early growth. These results are consistent with the high correlation between early wood production and the persistence of juvenile foliage reported by Beadle et al. (1989) in 2-to 4-year-old E. nitens plantations of different provenances, grown in the same locations. Juvenile foliage of E. nitens differs from that of E. sieberi in having a more horizontal orientation and persisting to a greater sapling age, further increasing the light interception of sapling E. nitens. However, predicted wood production over a 40-year rotation was much less affected by juvenile phase duration than was production over the first 4 years (Table 4), as mature canopy productivity was not affected by the juvenile phase (Fig. 6). Thus, caution is required in interpreting the results of short-term experiments, which are strongly affected by the initial exponential growth phase. Nonetheless, selection of species and populations with a pronounced juvenile phase may be advantageous for fibre production over short rotations, where rapid attainment of canopy closure has a greater impact on whole rotation production.

Stand age (yrs)

Fig. 6. Predicted overstorey (heavy line) and understorey (light line) leaf area index and standing overstorey wood biomass plotted as a function of stand age for the cases where the period of transition from juvenile to adult foliage is (a) 8, (b) 4 (base case), and (e) 0 years, i.e., no juvenile foliage is produced.

3.3. Long-term productivity The model implications for long-term production were assessed with 600-year simulations for the base case where all overstorey wood in the

D.A. King / Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

196

80I 60

ses v

10

13h~N'vested 2o

g CD ,

i 10

~-- 0

i

i 20

i

a 30

i

i 40

i

i 50

k

L 60

i

i 70

d

i 8O

i

k 90

k

i tO0

i

i 110

i

i 120

Rotation length (yrs) Fig. 8. Projected amount of phosphorus lost in harvested wood, postharvest debris burns and leaching over 600 years, plotted as a function of harvest rotation length. The horizontal line indicates the cumulative 600-year input of phosphorus through atmospheric deposition.

b)

m

c) 4O

I

0 6OO

Time (yrs) Fig. 7. Predicted standing overstorey wood biomass over 600 years for E. sieberi in East Gippsland, Victoria, for harvest rotation lengths of (a) 120, (b) 60 and (c) 30 years. The horizontal line indicates the wood biomass attained at the end of the first rotation for each rotation length considered.

stems and large branches is removed at harvest, while all leaves, twigs and bark are left on site and burned along with the non-woody litter layer and understorey vegetation. As shown in Fig. 7, the predicted wood production of successive rotations increases for long rotations and decreases for short rotations, with production remaining unchanged for a rotation length of 79 years. Whether production declines or increases over multiple rotations depends entirely on the net balance of the limiting nutrient, phosphorus. Fig. 8 shows that the sum of P losses (primarily due to harvests and debris burns) is greatest for a short rotation length of 15 to 20 years and declines as rotation length is increased above this value. A

net loss of P is predicted for rotation lengths of less than 76 years when the losses exceed the cumulative atmospheric input. The predicted mean annual wood production (harvested wood/total growth time) for the first rotation attains a maximum at a stand age of 26 years (Fig. 9), similar to the age predicted by empirical yield tables for E. sieberi in East Gippsland (Borough et al., 1978). This age of peak mean annual production is substantially greater than the age of peak net annual production of Fig. 5 because the former quantity averages production from stand initiation (when production is nil) to the indicated age. However, the predicted

o.8

~j o8

¢~

:[

o2

o

10

2o

3o

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

Rotation length (yrs)

Fig. 9. Projected mean annual wood production (harvested stem and branchwood/total growth time) plotted as a function of rotation length for the first rotation (heavy line) and all rotations over a 600-year period (light line).

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

mean annual production over a period of 600 years, plotted as a function of rotation length, differs substantially from that determined for the first rotation. The net loss of P from the system for rotations shorter than 76 years causes production to decline over time, thereby reducing the long-term mean annual production below that predicted for the first rotation (Fig. 9). As a result, the maximum mean annual production over 600 years is lower than that of the first rotation and occurs at a longer rotation length of 34 years. The above patterns in long-term productivity would be shifted by different management scenarios. The removal of whole trees at harvest, including leaves, twigs and bark, as well as wood, increases the nutrient loss from the system, thereby increasing the rotation length required to Table 5 Predicted sustainable rotation length for specified managem e n t practices M a n a g e m e n t practice

Sustainable rotation length (yrs)

Base case No understorey All overstorey bark, twigs and leaves removed along with harvested wood No postharvest burning

79 103 114

42

In the base case, all overstorey tree bark, twigs and leaves are left on site and burned after harvest (along with above-ground nonwoody litter and understorey parts). Each of the other cases involves one change to the base case, as specified.

197

sustain production (Table 5). Omitting the understorey also increases the predicted sustainable rotation length because the resulting increase in overstorey wood production and nutrient concentration increases the nutrient loss in wood harvests. For 40-year rotations, omission of the understorey increases the first rotation wood harvest by 17%, while increasing the cumulative 600-year production by only 13%, due to this greater nutrient loss. In contrast, the cessation of postharvest burning substantially decreases the sustainable rotation length, as fire accounts for approximately 1/3 of the total P lost in the base case (Fig. 8). The latter assessment assumes that the understorey is cut but left on site) and the soil and litter are tilled mechanically, as is required for successful eucalypt regeneration if fire is not used to prepare the seed bed (Cremer et al., 1978). The sustainable rotation length would also be affected by changes in the amount of P input from the atmosphere or lost in wood harvest and fire. The estimate of P deposition is uncertain, as this quantity has not been extensively measured in Australia and may vary between sites depending on proximity to anthropogenic sources and wind patterns. The estimation of P losses is also subject to uncertainty, as the relative P concentration in wood vs. foliage may vary between eucalypt species by a factor of two (Attiwill and Leeper, 1987), while fire losses depend on fire intensity, controlled by air temperature and humidity. These uncertainties are addressed in Table 6, which shows the effects of + 50% changes in

Table 6 Influence of key factors on the sustainable rotation length, defined as the harvest rotation length for which the final rotation wood mass after 600 years equals the first rotation wood mass Factor

Sustainable rotation length (yrs) predicted with _+50% changes in the indicated factors

Atmospheric P deposition Wood P concentration relative to foliar P concentration Fraction of P lost from components burned after each harvest Base case

167 51 61

-

50%

+ 50%

45 122 108 79

All overstorey tree bark, twigs and leaves are left on site and burned after harvest (along with aboveground nonwoody litter and understorey parts) in each case modelled here.

198

D.A. King~Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

atmospheric inputs, ratio of wood to foliage P concentration and fraction of P lost in debris burns. Atmospheric deposition had the largest impact on the predicted sustainable rotation length, which was inversely proportional to the P input (Table 6). The sustainable rotation length would also be affected by wildfires, which are difficult to exclude from highly flammable eucalypt forests, as judged from the history of wildfires in Australia (Pyne, 1991). Because the uncertainty in the predicted sustainable rotation length is of the same magnitude as the impact of different management practices, predictions concerning the latter should be viewed as relative and not absolute projections. For example, the conclusion that whole tree harvests increase the rotation length required for sustainable production agrees with other assessments of management impacts (e.g. Kimmins, 1977) and is more robust than the prediction of a particular sustainable rotation length. On the other hand, for the 26-year rotation maximizing the short-term mean annual production, long-term production is predicted to decline for all of the model variations and management practices considered in Tables 5 and 6. Thus, the maintenance of productivity in intensively managed, short-rotation plantations requires additional nutrient inputs, even with management to reduce nutrient losses.

3.4. Effects of fertilization on production The application of nutrients in fertilizers to replace those lost in harvested material and boost soil reserves and productivity is an increasingly common practice in the management of Pinus radiata plantations in Australia (Turner and Lambert, 1986). The response to fertilization was simulated by assuming that applied P initially enters the labile pool, as would be expected for highly soluble superphosphate fertilizers. Application of 5 g m -2 (50 kg ha -t) of P at the time of planting produced a manyfold increase in simulated wood accumulation over the first several years, similar to the fertilization response reported for seedlings in the Orbost-Cann River region (Raison et al., 1993) and in other eucalypt fertilization experiments (Cromer and Williams,

~?

14

~

o6

E

~o, "~ 02 Z o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Stand age (yrs)

9

iiiii

10

11

12

13

14

15

Fig. 10. Predicted net annual wood production for E. sieberi in East Gippsland Victoria, without fertilizer (light line) and with 5 g m -2 of P applied at the time of planting (heavy line), with adequate N to insure that P remains the growth-limiting nutrient.

1982). However, the relative impact of fertilization decreases with time (Fig. 10), as the initial difference in wood production rates is largely a consequence of enhanced leaf area and light interception early in the growth of the fertilized stand, similar to the early effect of juvenile foliage (Table 4, Fig. 6). The relative enhancement of P uptake is also greatest initially, because most P in the labile pool passes to the more tightly bound inorganic pool over a period of several years, as modelled here, where it is less available for plant uptake. The predicted 25% increase in wood production over a 40-year rotation associated with the above fertilization is substantial, although less than might be inferred directly from short-term experiments. Substantially greater enhancements in wood production in response to a similar-sized P application were reported for Pinus radiata grown for 30 years on a very P-deficient soil in Southeastern Australia (Turner and Lambert, 1986). However, P. radiata shows reduced growth at foliar P concentrations of 1 mg g-a (Turner and Lambert, 1986), three times the foliar P concentration observed in E sieberi in East Gippsland (Table 3). The predicted long-term response to 2 g P m -2 applied at the beginning of every 40-year rotation following the first harvest is shown in Fig. 11. Production rises in the first few rotations,

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

E 60

b)

E O ~5

4o

~

2o

6O

e)

2O I

o'

600

Time (yrs)

above 0.4 g m -2 are ineffective in promoting additional long-term growth if no N is added. The additional N input required to maintain a nutrient balance after P fertilization could arise in part from N fixation by legumes. Current rates of N fixation appear to be quite low in mature forests of the Orbost region, due to light and P limitation of understorey legumes (Raison et al., 1993). However, the native N fixer, Acacia myrtifolia, showed a very large increase in N accumulation in response to P fertilization when planted after logging and might contribute a substantial fraction of the additional N required on P-fertilized sites (Raison et al., 1993). The use of N fixers would have the added benefit of adding N in an organic form (litter) less subject to leaching than commercial N fertilizers (Beets and Madgwick, 1988). Thus, an understorey managed for N fixers might increase long-term production on P-fertilized sites, despite the 10 to 15% reduction in long-term wood production attributed to the presence of an understorey without N fixers. Given adequate N inputs, the benefits of P fertilization are projected to accumulate for centuries, for the case of 40-year rotations, shown in Fig. 12. During the first rotation, only 6% of the applied P is incorporated in wood, while over

Fig. 11. Predicted standing wood biomass over 600 years for 40-year rotations of E. sieberi in East Gippsland, Victoria for the case of (a) no fertilization, (b) 2 g m 2 p applied at the beginning of each rotation following the first, and (c) similar P additions as in (b), plus enough additional N to prevent this nutrient from limiting growth after P fertilization.

losses Firelosses

i f Leaching

f

lOO

i but then declines due to limitation of growth by nitrogen in later rotations when the projected foliar N / P ratio declines below the assumed critical value of 20. However, if the N input of 0.4 g m -2 yr - t due to atmospheric deposition is increased to 1.4 g m - 2 y r - t by additional inputs, P remains the growth-limiting nutrient, and production continues to increase over the 600-year period as P builds up in both organic and inorganic soil pools. The model predicts an almost linear increase in long-term production as the applied P is increased from 0 to 2 g m -2 rotation -1, given adequate N. On the other hand, P fertilizations

199

~

"

"

Harvested wood

~

Soil and litter

40

~ 2o o

0

1

2

3

4

5

'

6

7

8

9

to

11

12

13

t4

Rotationsafterbeginningfertilization Fig. 12. Relative accumulation of P added in fertilizer in different components, for E. sieberi grown on a 40-year rotation, with 1 g m -2 of P applied per rotation and adequate N inputs to insure that N does not limit growth. The applied P accumulation in a given component was calculated as the difference between the amounts of P in the component with and without fertilization.

200

D.A. King / Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

Table 7 Phosphorus pool sizes and turnover times projected for a 40-year-old unfertilized stand of E. sieberi Phosphorus pool Pool size Pool turnover (g P m -2) time (yrs) Live vegetation Fine litter Woody litter Slow soil organic matter Passive soil organic matter Inorganic P Labile P

1.7 1.0 0.3 4.5 5.0 5.5 0.2

6.8 4,3 25 25 650 120 2.4

Inorganic P refers to phosphorus which is bound to the soil in iron and aluminum complexes that can potentially enter the organic P cycle, but does not include occluded P which remains completely unavailable to trees.

90% of this P remains in the soil and litter pools. However, over 600 years, the fraction of total applied P accumulated in harvested wood increases to 26%. This long-term cumulative response to P fertilization can be related to the sizes and turnover rates of the different P pools, shown in Table 7. Most of the P added to the labile pool enters the inorganic P pool over the first few years, i.e., it is bound to the soil. P entering the vegetation is rapidly cycled into the soil organic matter pools through litter production, while P in the inorganic pool is slowly solublized by roots and shifted into the organic pools, as modelled here. Because the inorganic and passive organic P pools are large and have turnover times of one and six centuries, respectively (Table 7), the applied P is predicted to have long-term effects in addition to the initial impact on growth shown in Fig. 10. Experimental evidence for such long-term benefits is difficult to acquire, although the observation of elevated wood production and foliar and soil P concentrations in a Pinus radiata stand, two rotations after fertilization (Gentle et al., 1986), is consistent with these predictions. 3.5. Caveats

As with any model of living systems, numerous approximations and idealizations have been made

in projecting forest growth. Major approximations include: 1. The assumption of laterally uniform distributions of leaves, roots and nutrients, with no regard for canopy gaps and below-ground heterogeneity which occur in real forests. 2. No inclusion of occasional events which could disrupt forest development, such as pest and pathogen outbreaks, extreme droughts and severe fires. 3. No inclusion of possible impacts of logging on factors other than P and N cycling, such as loss of other nutrients and soil erosion and compaction by heavy machines (Sands et al,, 1979; Lacey, 1993), which may reduce future production on old skid trails (Firth and Murphy, 1989). 4. Many of the parameters are uncertain, particularly regarding the phosphorus cycle, where it is difficult to measure the transfer rates among those pools which are not spatially separated. Note also, that the formulation was chosen for E. sieberi on sandy, P-deficient soils, and may not apply to other eucalypts on other sites. Making these assumptions has made the development, parameterization and presentation of the model much more feasible than would otherwise be the case. However, the resulting projections apply only for the ideal case of a uniform, healthy stand, and may be biased by uncertainties in the assumed mechanisms of forest growth. Thus, the results should be viewed as showing how different factors may interact to influence forest growth, rather than as realistic projections of future production.

Acknowledgements I thank R. McMurtrie and P. Khanna for helpful reviews of the manuscript and J. Raison, M. Kirschbaum, H. Keith and M. Connell for discussions of the approach and data from their East Gippsland research site. This work was supported by the N G A C Dedicated Greenhouse Research Grants Scheme and the Australian Research Council.

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

References Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M. and Federer, C.A., 1982. Predicting the effects of rotation length, harvest intensity, and fertilization on fiber yield from northern hardwood forests in New England. For. Sci., 28: 31-45. Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M. and McClaugherty, C.A., 1990. Predicting long term patterns of mass loss, nitorgen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot., 68: 2201-2208. Attiwill, P.M. and Leeper, G.W., 1987. Forest Soils and Nutrient Cycles. Melbourne Univ. Press, Melbourne, Vict., 222 pp. Beadle, C.L., McLeod, D.E., Turnbull, C.R.A., Ratkowsky, D.A. and McLeod, R., 1989. Juvenile/total foliage ratios in Eucalyptus nitens and the growth of stands and individual trees. Trees, 3: 117-124. Beets, P.N. and Madgwick, H.A.I., 1988. Above-ground dry matter and nutrient content of Pinus radiata as influenced by lupin, fertilizer, thinning, and stand age. N.Z.J. For. Sci., 18: 43-64. Beets, P.N. and Pollock, D.S., 1987a. Accumulation and partitioning of dry matter in Pinus radiata as related to stand age and thinning. N.Z.J. For. Sci., 17: 246-271. Beets, P.N. and Pollock, D.S., 1987b. Uptake and accumulation of nitrogen in Pinus radiata stands as related to age and thinning. N.Z.J. For. Sci., 353-371. Boland, D.J., Brooker, M.I.H., Chippendale, G.M., Hall, N., Hyland, B.P.M., Johnston, R.D., Kleinig, D.A. and Turner, J.D., 1984. Forest Trees of Australia. Nelson-CSIRO, Melbourne, 687 pp. Borough, C.J., Incoll, W.D., May, J.R. and Bird, T., 1978. Yield statistics. In: W.E. Hillis and A.G. Brown (Editors), Eucalypts for Wood Production. CSIRO, Australia, pp. 201 - 225. Campbell, R.G., Ferguson, I.S. and Opie, J.E., 1979. Simulating growth and yield of mountain ash stands: a deterministic model. Aust. For. Res., 9: 189-201. Cannell, M.G.R., 1985. Dry matter partitioning in tree crops. In: M.G.R. Cannell and J.E. Jackson (Editors), Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbotts Ripton, Huntingdon, UK, pp. 160-193. Cannell, M.G.R., Milne, R., Sheppard, L.J. and Unsworth, M.H., 1987. Radiation interception and productivity of willow. J. Appl. Ecol., 24: 261-278. Comins, H.R. and McMurtrie, R.E., 1993. Long-term biotic response of nutrient-limited forest ecosystems to COe-enrichment; equilibrium behavior of integrated plant-soil models. Ecol. Appl., 3: 666-681. Commonwealth of Australia, 1986. Atlas of Australian Resources, Third Series, Vol. 4, Climate, 60 pp. Crane, W.J.B. and Banks, J.C.G., 1992. Accumulation and retranslocation of foliar nitrogen in fertilized and irrigated Pinus radiata. For. Ecol. Manage., 52: 201-223. Cremer, K.W., Cromer, R.N. and Florence, R.G., 1978. Stand

201

establishment. In: W.E. Hillis and A.G, Brown (Editors), Eucalypts for Wood Production. CSIRO, Australia, pp. 81-135. Cromer, R.N. and Williams, E.R., 1982. Biomass and nutrient accumulation in a planted E. globulus (Labill.) fertilizer trial. Aust. J. Bot., 30: 265-278. Feller, M.C., 1981. Catchment nutrient budgets and geological weathering in Eucalyptus regnans ecosystems in Victoria. Aust. J. Ecol., 6: 65-77. Field, C. and Mooney, H.A., 1986. The photosynthesisnitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: T.J. Givnish (Editor), On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 22-55. Firth, J. and Murphy, G., 1989. Skid trails and their effects on the growth and management of young Pinus radiata. N.Z. J. For. Sci., 19: 3-21. Frederick, D.J., Madgwick, H.A.I., Jurgensen, M.F. and Oliver, G.R., 1985. Dry matter content and nutrient distribution in an age series of Eucalyptus regnans plantations in New Zealand. N.Z.J. For. Sci., 15: 158-179. Gardner, W.K., Barber, D.A. and Parbery, D.G., 1983. The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. III The probable mechanism by which phosphorus movement in the soil/root interface is enhanced. Plant Soil, 70: 107-124. Gentle, S.W., Humphreys, F.R. and Lambert, M.J., 1986. Continuing response of Pinus radiata to phosphatic fertilizers over two rotations. For. Sci., 32: 822-829. Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D., Anderson, N.H., Cline, S.P., Aumen, N.G., Sedell, J.R., Lienkaemper, G.W., Cromack, Jr., K. and Cummins, K.W., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res., 15: 133302. Harmon, M.E., Brown, S. and Gower, S.T., 1993. Consequences of tree mortality to the global carbon cycle. In: T.S. Vinson and T.P. Kolchugina (Editors), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Carbon Cycling in Boreal Forest and Sub-arctic Ecosystems: Biospheric Responses and Feedbacks to Global Change. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency E P A / 6 0 0 / R - 9 3 / 0 8 4 , pp. 167-177. Keith, H., 1991. Fire, nitrogen cycling and eucalypt growth. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 369 pp. Kimmins, J.P., 1977. Evaluation of the consequences for future tree productivity of the loss of nutrients in whole-tree harvesting. For. Ecol. Manage., 1: 169-183. King, D., 1991. Correlations between biomass allocation, relative growth rate and light environment in tropical forest saplings. Funct. Ecol., 5: 485-492. King, D.A., 1993. A model analysis of the influence of root and foliage allocation on forest production and competition between trees. Tree Physiol., 12: 119-135. King, D.A., 1994. Influence of light level on the growth and morphology of saplings in a Panamanian forest. Am. J. Bot., 81: 948-957. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Bellingham, D.W. and Cromer, R.N.,

202

D.A. King~Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203

1992. Growth analysis of the effect of phosphorus nutrition on seedlings of Eucalyptus grand&. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 19: 55-66. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., King, D.A., Comins, H.N., McMurtrie, R.E., Medlyn, B.E., Pongracic, S., Murty, D., Keith, H., Raison, R.J., Khanna, P.K. and Sheriff, D.W., 1994. Modelling forest response to increasing CO 2 concentration under nutrient-limited conditions. Plant Cell Environ., 17: 1081-1099. Lacey, S.T., 1993. Soil deformation and erosion in forestry. Technical Report, Forestry Commission, Sydney, N.S.W., 62 pp. Linder, S. and Rook, D.A., 1984. Effects of mineral nutrition on carbon dioxide exchange and partitioning of carbon in trees. In: G.D. Bowen and E.K.S. Nambiar (Editors), Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, London, pp. 211-236. Lowman, M.D., 1992. Leaf growth dynamics and herbivory in five species of Australian rain-forest canopy trees. J. Ecol., 80: 433-447. Madgwick, H.A.I., Jackson, D.S. and Knight, P.J., 1977. Above-ground dry matter, energy, and nutrient contents of trees in an age series of Pinus radiata plantations. N.Z.J. For. Sci., 7: 445-468. McMurtrie, R.E., 1985. Forest productivity in relation to carbon partitioning and nutrient cycling: a mathematical model. In: M.G.R. Cannell and J.E. Jackson (Editors), Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbotts Ripton, Huntingdon, UK, pp. 194-207. McMurtrie, R.E., 1991. Relationship of forest productivity to nutrient and carbon supply - a modeling analysis. Tree Physiol., 9: 87-99. McMurtrie, R. and Wolf, L., 1983a. Above- and below-ground growth of forest stands: a carbon budget model. Ann. Bot., 52: 437-448. McMurtrie, R. and Wolf, L., 1983b. A model of competition between trees and grass for radiation, water and nutrients. Ann. Bot., 52: 449-458. McMurtrie, R.E., Rook, D.A. and Kelliher, F.M., 1990. Modelling the yield of Pinus radiata on a site limited by water and nitrogen. For. Ecol. Manage., 30: 381-413. Mullctte, K.J. and Elliott, A.G.L., 1974. Insoluble phosphorus usage by Eucalyptus. Plant Soil, 41: 199-205. Nambiar, E.K.S. and Fife, D.N., 1991. Nutrient retranslocation in temperate conifers. Tree Physiol., 9: 185-207. Parton, W.J., Schimel, D.S., Cole, C.V. and Ojima, D.S., 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51: 11731179. Pastor, J. and Post, W.M., 1986. Influence of climate, soil moisture, and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochemistry, 2: 3-27. Pastor, J. and Post, W.M., 1988. Response of northern forests to CO2-induced climate change. Nature, 334: 55-58. Polglase, P.J. and Attiwill, P.M., 1992. Nitrogen and phospho-

rus cycling in relation to stand age of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. Plant Soil, 142: 157-166. Pryor, L.D., 1976. The Biology of Eucalypts. Edward Arnold, London, 82 pp. Pyne, S.J., 1991. Burning Bush: a Fire History of Australia. Henry Holt, New York, 520 pp. Raison, R.J., Khanna, P.K. and Woods, P.V., 1985. Transfer of elements to the atmosphere during low-intensity prescribed fires in three Australian subalpine eucalypt forests. Can. J. For. Res., 15: 657-664. Raison, R.J., Jacobsen, K.L., Connell, M.J., Khanna, P.K., Bauhus, R.A., Falkiner, R.A., Smith, S.J., Piotrowski, P. and Keith, H., 1991. Nutrient cycling and tree nutrition. In: Collaborative Silvicultural Systems Research in East Gippsland between CSIRO and the Victorian Department of Conservation and Environment. Interim Report, CSIRO Division of Forestry, Canberra, A.C.T., pp. 5-62. Raison, R.J., Jacobsen, K.L., Connell, M.J., Khanna, P.K., Keith, H., Smith, S.J. and Piotrowski, P., 1993. Nutrient cycling and tree nutrition. In: Collaborative Research in Regrowth Forests of East Gippsland between CSIRO and the Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Second Progress Report, CSIRO Division of Forestry, Canberra, A.C.T., pp. 8-89. Reich, P.B., Waiters, M.B. and Ellsworth, D.S., 1992. Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr., 62: 365-392. Ryan, M.G., 1991. A simple method for estimating gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems. Tree Physiol., 9: 255-266. Ryan, M.G. and Waring, R.H., 1992. Maintenance respiration and stand development in a subalpine lodgepole pine forest. Ecology, 73: 2100-2108. Sachs, D. and Sollins, P., 1986. Potential effects of management practices on nitrogen nutrition and long-term productivity of western hemlock stands. For. Ecol. Manage., 17: 25-36. Sands, P.J., Cromer, R.N. and Kirschbaum, M.U.F., 1992. A model of nutrient response in Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 19: 459-470. Sands, R., Greacen, E.L. and Gerard, C.J., 1979. Compaction of sandy soils planted to Radiata pine forests. I. A penetrometer study. Aust. J. Soil Res., 17: 101-113. Smith, N. J., 1991. Sun and shade leaves: clues to how salal (Gaultheria shallon) responds to overstorey stand density. Can. J. For. Res., 21: 300-305. Tanner, C.B. and Sinclair, T.R., 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: H.M. Taylor, W.R. Jordan and T.R. Sinclair (Editors), Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 1-27. Thompson, W.A. and Wheeler, A.M., 1992. Photosynthesis by mature needles of field-grown Pinus radiata. For. Ecol. Manage., 52: 225-242. Turner, J. and Lambert, M.J., 1986. Nutrition and nutritional

D.A. King/Ecological Modelling 87 (1996) 181-203 relationships of Pinus radiata. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17: 325-350. Wang, Y.P. and Jarvis, P.G., 1990. Description and validation of an array model -MAESTRO. Agric. For. Meteorol., 51: 257-280. Waring, R.H. and Schlesinger, W.H., 1985. Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 340 pp.

203

West, P.W., 1993. Model of the above-ground assimilate partitioning and growth of individual trees in even-aged forest monoculture. J. Theor. Biol., 161: 369-394. West, P.W. and Mattay, 1993. Yield prediction models and comparative growth rates for six eucalypt species. Aust. For., 56: 211-225.