A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites inhabiting nucleated red blood cells

A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites inhabiting nucleated red blood cells

Accepted Manuscript A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites inhabiting nucleated red blood cells Vaidas Palin...

457KB Sizes 66 Downloads 58 Views

Accepted Manuscript A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites inhabiting nucleated red blood cells Vaidas Palinauskas, Asta Križanauskienė, Tatjana A. Iezhova, Casimir V. Bolshakov, Jane Jönsson, Staffan Bensch, Gediminas Valkiūnas PII: DOI: Reference:

S0014-4894(12)00374-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2012.12.003 YEXPR 6575

To appear in:

Experimental Parasitology

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

24 October 2012 11 December 2012 13 December 2012

Please cite this article as: Palinauskas, V., Križanauskienė, A., Iezhova, T.A., Bolshakov, C.V., Jönsson, J., Bensch, S., Valkiūnas, G., A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites inhabiting nucleated red blood cells, Experimental Parasitology (2012), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2012.12.003

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.



A new method for isolation of purified genomic DNA from haemosporidian parasites



inhabiting nucleated red blood cells

3  4 

Vaidas Palinauskasa, Asta Križanauskienėa, Tatjana A. Iezhovaa, Casimir V.



Bolshakovb, Jane Jönssonc, Staffan Benschc and Gediminas Valkiūnasa

6  7 

a



[email protected], tel: +37069887279, fax: +37052729352.



b

Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius, LT-08412, Lithuania. E-mail:

Biological Station Rybachy of the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of

10 

Sciences, Rybachy, 238535, Kaliningrad Region, Russia.

11 

c

12 

University, Ecology Building, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden.

Department of Biology, Molecular Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, Lund

13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25 

1



Abstract



During the last 10 years, whole genomes have been sequenced from an increasing



number of organisms. However, there is still no data on complete genomes of avian



and lizard Plasmodium spp. or other haemosporidian parasites. In contrast to



mammals, bird and reptile red blood cells have nuclei and thus blood of these



vertebrates contains high amount of host DNA; that complicates preparation of



purified template DNA from haemosporidian parasites, which has been the main



obstacle for genomic studies of these parasites. In the present study we describe a



method that generates large amount of purified avian haemosporidian DNA. The

10 

method is based on a unique biological feature of haemosporidian parasites, namely

11 

that mature gametocytes in blood can be induced to exflagellate in vitro. This results

12 

in the development of numerous microgametes, which can be separated from host

13 

blood cells by simple centrifugation.

14 

Our results reveal that this straight forward method provides opportunities to collect

15 

pure parasite DNA material, which can be used as a template for various genetic

16 

analyses including whole genome sequencing of haemosporidians infecting birds and

17 

lizards.

18  19 

Key Words: Avian malaria, haemosporidians, Haemoproteus tartakovskyi,

20 

hSISKIN1, template, DNA purification, next generation sequencing.

21  22 

1. Introduction

23  24  25 

The research of avian malaria parasites has a long history, starting in the end of XIXth century (Garnham, 1966). For a long time, these widespread parasites were

2



used as models to assist human malaria research (Trager, 1950; Davey, 1951; Coatney



et al., 1953; Ball and Chao, 1961; Ball, 1964; McGhee et al., 1977). The theoretical



importance of avian Plasmodium and related haemosporidian parasites remains



because of their astonishing diversity and phylogenetic relationships with the most



dangerous human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Pick et al., 2011).



Additionally, avian haemosporidian parasites continue to be of high interest in



evolutionary, ecological as well as in host-parasite interaction studies (Bensch et al.,



2000, 2004, 2009; Ricklefs et al., 2004; Palinauskas et al., 2008; Perkins, 2008; Levin



et al., 2009; Knowles et al., 2010; Ricklefs and Outlaw, 2010; Marzal et al., 2011).

10 

During the last 10 years, whole genomes have been sequenced from an

11 

increasing number of organisms. This innovative technique has progressively become

12 

more accessible and the first genomes of mammals, plants and important pathogens

13 

such as human malaria parasites have been determined (Arabidopsis Genome

14 

Initiative, 2000; Lander et al., 2001; Gardner et al., 2002; Carlton et al., 2005; Pain et

15 

al., 2008; Warren et al., 2010). The first malaria parasites to be sequenced was the

16 

human parasite species Plasmodium falciparum (Gardner et al., 2002). Since then the

17 

genomes of other malaria parasites, P. chabaudi, P. yoelii and P. knowlesi have been

18 

completed and published (Janssen et al., 2001; Carlton et al., 2002; Pain et al., 2008).

19 

Surprisingly, even though the cost of whole genome sequencing has been reduced to a

20 

fraction of the costs of the first attempts to sequence genomes, there is no information

21 

about complete avian or lizard Plasmodium spp. genomes. In Carlton et al's (2005)

22 

review, the only avian malaria parasite listed to be in the process of being sequenced

23 

was Plasmodium gallinaceum, however this attempt seems has come to a halt. The

24 

lack of genomic resources from avian malaria and other haemosporidians has

25 

prevented the construction of primers for amplification of microsatellites and other

3



rapidly evolving genomic regions. Therefore, studies on population genetics,



phylogeography, hybridization or molecular characterization of avian and reptilian



haemosporidians have so far been limited (Perkins, 2000; Austin and Perkins, 2006;



Beadell et al., 2006; Martinsen et al., 2008; Outlaw and Ricklefs, 2010; Valkiūnas et



al., 2012; Zehtindjiev et al., 2012).



In contrast to mammal blood, bird blood contains a high amount of host DNA,



which complicates preparation of template for genome sequencing. Random clone



sequencing is inefficient in haemosporidian parasites because the genome of



Plasmodium is 50 fold smaller than the genome of birds (Waltari and Edwards, 2002;

10 

DeBarry and Kissinger, 2011). With genomes of an avian haemosporidians at hand it

11 

would be possible to construct new markers for more variable nuclear genes for

12 

phylogenetic investigations, including a detail comparison of genomes of mammalian

13 

and bird malaria parasites. Until now, the majority of haemosporidian parasite studies

14 

of birds have used primers of mitochondrial or other cytoplasmic genes, which are

15 

maternal-inherited, thus not useful, for instance in investigations of within species

16 

variation or determining mate-recognition signals in parasites (Valkiūnas et al.,

17 

2008a, 2012).

18 

Unique biology of haemosporidian parasites provides opportunities to

19 

approach purified template preparation for analysis of their genomes. Mainly, the

20 

sexual process of haemosporidians is oogamy (Garnham, 1966), i.e., fertilization

21 

occurs extracellular and, therefore, development of gametes can be initiated and

22 

studied under controlled in vitro conditions (Valkiūnas et al., 2012). During

23 

exflagellation, gametocytes leave erythrocytes within several seconds; the nucleus of

24 

microgametocyte divides to produce eight nuclei and then tiny thread-like

25 

microgametes develop. This process naturally takes place in vectors immediately after

4



blood meal, but also can be easily induced in vitro (Garnham, 1966; Sinden, 1998;



Arai et al., 2001; Valkiūnas, 2005; Valkiūnas et al., 2012). The size and weight of



microgametes differ from blood cells thus the microgametes can be separated from



other cellular structures by gradient differences after centrifugation.



In the present study we describe a new method that generates large amount of



purified avian haemosporidian DNA. The method builds on in vitro manipulation of



mature haemosporidian gametocytes to enforce exflagellation and development of



numerous microgametes, which are separated from host blood cells by simple



centrifugation, followed by whole genome amplification. Our results reveal that this

10 

simple method is suitable for preparation of purified template for next-generation

11 

sequencing.

12  13 

2. Materials and methods

14  15 

2.1. Study site and collection of blood samples

16  17 

The study was carried out at the Biological station “Rybachy” of the

18 

Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences on the Curonian Spit in the

19 

Baltic Sea (55°05´N, 20°44´E) in May-July 2011. Based on previous work (Valkiūnas

20 

et al., 2008a), we focused on the haemosporidian parasite Haemoproteus tartakovskyi

21 

belonging to the family Haemoproteidae (cytochrome b lineage hSISKIN1). This

22 

parasite is prevalent in common European songbirds, the siskin (Spinus spinus) and

23 

crossbill (Loxia curvirostra), with parasitemia often >1% of infected red blood cells

24 

in them. Importantly, single infections of H. tartakovskyi are often common in these

25 

bird species (Valkiūnas, 2005).

5



In all, we captured 97 siskins and 23 crossbills for preliminary screening of



Haemoproteus infections by microscopy. The birds were caught opportunistically



using mist nets and ‘Rybachy’ type traps, and kept in cages for approximately 1-2 h



after capture. From each bird, the blood was collected into heparinized



microcapillaries by puncturing of the brachial vein. A drop of blood was used to make



2 blood films for microscopic investigation, and about 30-50 µl of blood was saved in



micro-tubes in non-lyses SET-buffer (Hellgren et al., 2004) for later molecular



analysis. The microtubes with blood in buffer were kept at -20°C until later analyses



in the laboratory.

10 

Blood films were air dried, fixed with absolute methanol and stained as

11 

described by Valkiūnas et al. (2008b). An Olympus BX51 light microscope equipped

12 

with Olympus DP12 digital camera and imaging software DP-SOFT was used to

13 

examine slides, prepare illustrations and to take measurements. About 100-150

14 

microscopic fields were examined at low magnification (×400) and then at least 100

15 

fields were studied at high magnification (×1000). Intensity of parasitemia was

16 

estimated as a percentage by actual counting of the number of parasites per 1000

17 

erythrocytes, as recommended by Godfrey et al. (1987). Blood parasites were

18 

identified according to Valkiūnas (2005).

19 

Uninfected birds and individuals with low parasitemia or co-infections with

20 

other parasites were released immediately after microscopic examination of blood

21 

films. Birds with > 1% of single H. tartakovskyi (hSISKIN1) were caged in a vector-

22 

free room under controlled conditions (19 ± 1 °C; 50-60% RH; the natural light-dark

23 

photoperiod). The birds were provided with canary seeds and water ad libitum. All

24 

birds survived and were released after experiments.

25 

6



2. 2. In vitro exflagellation and separation of microgametes

2  3 

The purification assay of parasite cells is based on initiation of exflagellation



in vitro, followed by centrifugation resulting in separation of blood cells and



microgametes due to different weight of these cells.



Approximately 200 µl of blood was taken using heparinized microcapillaries



from the brachial vein of each individual donor bird with H. tartakovskyi parasitemia



≥1% (Table 1). The work was performed at 19 ± 1°C temperature. The blood was



placed immediately in a microtube containing 10µl of sodium citrate solution (3.7%),

10 

gently mixed and exposed to air. Four minutes after exposure to air, the sample was

11 

centrifuged for 5 min at 7000 rpm. After centrifugation, approximately 20-50µl of

12 

supernatant (blood plasma) was stored in 150 µl SET-buffer and placed in -20°C

13 

freezer for further processing in the laboratory.

14 

For comparison of microscopy and PCR-based results, we prepared smears on

15 

glass slides for microscopic examination; that was done 1) immediately after taking

16 

blood from all donor birds, 2) 4 min after mixing the blood with sodium citrate and

17 

exposure the mixture to air, and 3) after centrifugation when the supernatant of blood

18 

plasma with microgametes was collected and placed in SET-buffer.

19 

Number of microgametes in 1 µl of plasma was calculated as follows. First,

20 

1µl of plasma with microgametes was placed using a micropipette on a glass slide,

21 

resulting in a circular smear of approximately 3-5 mm in diameter. The smears were

22 

air-dried, fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. Second, we calculated the

23 

number of microscopic fields (× 1000 magnification) in each circular smear, and the

24 

number of microgametes in each field, the summarized number of microgametes in all

7



microscopic fields is approximately equal to the total number of microgametes in 1µl



of plasma (Table 1).



Voucher specimens of microgamtes of H. tartakovskyi before and after



centrifugation were deposited in the Institute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre,



Vilnius, Lithuania (accession numbers 48664 – 48672 NS);

6  7 

2. 3. DNA extraction and PCR of avian blood samples

8  9 

For total DNA extraction from blood, we used innuPREP Blood DNA Mini Kit

10 

(Analytikjena, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For

11 

genetic analysis, we used a nested- PCR protocol amplifying part of the mitochondrial

12 

cyt b gene (Bensch et al., 2000; Hellgren et al., 2004). In the first PCR we used the

13 

primers HaemFNI and HaemNR3, general for haemosporidian parasites (Hellgren et

14 

al., 2004). In the second PCR we used the primers specific to Haemoproteus and

15 

Plasmodium spp., HAEMF and HAEMR2 (Bensch et al., 2000) and primers specific

16 

to Leucocytozoon spp. HaemFL and HaemR3L (Hellgren et al., 2004). The

17 

amplification was evaluated by running 1.5 µl of the final PCR product on a 2%

18 

agarose gel.

19 

Before amplification, we used samples with different DNA concentrations

20 

(see below and Fig. 2A). After whole genome amplification, we expected to obtain

21 

increased amounts of DNA correspondingly to the DNA concentrations in the initial

22 

samples. The pattern of DNA concentration before and after whole genome

23 

amplification was used as a control for possible contamination.

24  25 

For sequencing we used the procedures as described by Bensch et al. (2000). Fragments for Haemoproteus spp. and Leucocytozoon spp. identification were

8



sequenced from the 5’ end with the primers HAEMF and HaemFL respectively. We



used dye terminator cycling sequencing (big dye) and loaded on an ABI PRISMTM



3100 capillary sequencing robot (Applied Biosystems, USA). Sequences were edited



and aligned using the program BioEdit (Hall, 1999). The ‘Basic Local Alignment



Search Tool’ (Blast) was used to determine the lineage of detected parasite sequences.

6  7 

2. 4. Extraction and molecular evaluation of microgamete DNA

8  9 

DNA of microgametes was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit

10 

(Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Later, 3µl of total extracted DNA was evaluated by running

11 

on 1% baby gel using a dilution series of lambda marker (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and

12 

3.125 ng). After evaluation of DNA concentration, samples with visible bands of

13 

approximately 10 kb and approximate total quantities of 0.2-1 ng in 3 µl (Fig. 2, A)

14 

were used for whole genome amplification (Illustra GenomiphiV2 DNA

15 

Amplification Kit, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The amount of DNA post

16 

amplification was evaluated by running 1 µl of amplified DNA on 1% baby gel using

17 

a dilution series of lambda markers as described above.

18  19 

3. Results

20 

Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (the mitochondrial cyt b lineage hSISKIN1,

21 

GenBank accession no. JX026908) was found in 22.7% of siskins and 52.2% of

22 

crossbills (Fig. 1, A). The intensity of parasitemia was > 1% in 13 siskins and 4

23 

crossbills. After microscopic examination and molecular analysis based on nested

24 

PCR of mitochondrial cyt b gene, it was revealed that 10 siskins and 4 crossbills

9



contained co-infections with Leucocytozoon spp. For further analysis, we discarded



samples with co-infections and used 3 siskins with single H. tartakovskyi (SISKIN1)



infection (Table 1).



For further analysis we used 3 samples with approximately 38.5, 10.1 and 3.5



microgametes in each ×1000 magnification microscopic field determined by counting



the cells in the drop of plasma made after centrifugation (Fig. 1, D and E, and Table



1). For example, having 38.5 microgametes in one microscopic field, 1µl of plasma



contains approximately 3850 microgametes or 0.11 ng of DNA of H. tartakovskyi



(assuming that mass of 1000 malaria genomes is 0.0275ng).

10 

The concentration of parasite DNA was increased several times by whole

11 

genome amplification (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The DNA mass of samples 1 and 3 was

12 

increased almost 200 times. The sample No 2 with initial mass of 0.13 ng/µl was

13 

increased 50 times (Table 1).

14  15 

4. Discussion

16  17 

This study shows that separation of haemosporidian microgametes can be

18 

efficiently initiated for genomic studies when the intensity of gametocytes is ≥ 2% in

19 

donor birds. Importantly, the preparation of template is possible even if one individual

20 

heavily infected bird with single haemosporidian infection is available. Interestingly,

21 

exflagellation of Haemoproteus spp. is easy to initiate and it does not require using

22 

additional media in vitro conditions; the exflagellation starts immediately after

23 

exposure of blood containing mature gametocytes to air (Valkiūnas, 2005). Species of

24 

Plasmodium (unlike many Haemoproteus spp.) require additional stimuli for initiation

25 

of the sexual process in vitro, e.g., the presence of vector-derived xanthurenic acid

10



and blood-derived factors (Sinden, 1998; Arai et al., 2001); thus additional efforts will



be needed for collection of microgametes of malaria parasites. Additionally, intensity



of gametocyte parasitemia usually is lower during Plasmodium infections than



Haemoproteus infections (Valkiūnas, 2005); that also might complicate isolation of



microgametes of malaria parasites. This warrants additional investigation.



Recently, several methods to obtain purified avian Plasmodium spp. DNA



have been proposed by Graczyk et al. (1994) and Palinauskas et al. (2010). In the



former study, the authors used water-soluble cationic detergent EDTA-20 for



disruption of the red blood cell membranes and subsequent centrifugation technique

10 

to separate haemosporidian parasites from the red blood cells (Graczyk et al., 1994).

11 

It was shown that this method can be used for separation of avian blood cells and

12 

haemosporidian cells. However, pure template for genomic studies has not been

13 

obtained using this technique so far. An advantage of our method of purification of

14 

haemosporidian parasites for genomic studies is that microgamete purification is done

15 

directly without cell lyses, which is a case in the method described by Graczyk et al.

16 

(1994). Supposedly, lysed blood cells would release huge amount of cytoplasmic and

17 

nucleic genomic material to blood plasma and complicate purification process. In our

18 

case, unlysed blood cells contain host DNA within the cells, which is suppressed to

19 

the bottom of the microtube after centrifugation. Separation of haemosporidian

20 

parasites from their host cells probably could be done using different sporogonic

21 

stages (e.g. ookinetes, oocysts or sporozoites), however there is no information about

22 

that so far.

23 

The study by Palinauskas et al. (2010) revealed that it is possible to isolate

24 

single parasite cells by using a laser micro-dissection techniques, and then to obtain

25 

sequences from dissected parasites. With this technique one can collect hundreds of

11



single parasite cells into a single test tube. For instance, the total amount of DNA that



can be obtained from 500 malaria genomes is approximately 0.01375 ng (assuming a



25 MB genome has a mass of 2.75 x 10-14 g). However, for whole genome sequencing



the required amount of DNA is many folds larger, amounting to 50-2000 ng



depending on different protocols and sequencing platforms (Margulies et al., 2005).



From the present survey we can state that long lasting efforts to prepare the



purified template for sequencing the whole genome of haemosporidian parasites



developing in nucleated red blood cells finally is available. It is based on simple



separation of host DNA and parasite DNA based on natural exflagellation of

10 

microgametes avoiding lyses of blood cells. Because exflagellation is a characteristic

11 

feature of all haemosporidians and can be induced in vitro (Garnham, 1966; Sinden,

12 

1998; Valkiūnas, 2005), our method is recommended for template preparation in

13 

analysis of genomes of any other haemosporidian species inhabiting nucleated red

14 

blood cells.

15  16 

Acknowledgments

17 

The experiments described herein comply with the current laws of Lithuania

18 

and Russia. This article benefited from comments made by 2 anonymous reviewers.

19 

The authors acknowledge the support of the Global Grant (VPI-3.1.-ŠMM-07-K-01-

20 

047).

21  22 

Figures

23 

Figure 1. Single Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (lineage hSISKIN1) infection in the

24 

blood of siskin Spinus spinus: A – Gametocytes in the peripheral blood before

25 

exposure to air; B – Exflagellation of 8 microgametes in vitro 4 min after exposure of

12



blood to air; C – Microgametes in blood smear before centrifugation; D, E – Purified



microgametes in blood plasma solution after centrifugation at high (D) and low (E)



magnification. Arrows – nuclei of parasites. Giemsa-stained thin blood films. Bar =



10 μm.

5  6 

Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of microgametes’ DNA with Λ marker. A –



before whole genome amplification (3µl): line M – nucleotide size marker; lines 1, 2



and 3 – microgamete DNA samples used in analysis; lines N – microgamete DNA



samples with low concentration of genomic material not included in analysis; line C –

10 

positive control from blood sample; lines Λ3.2 and 6.2 – markers for DNA

11 

quantification. B – after whole genome amplification (1µl): lines M, N and Λ3.2-25.2

12 

are the same as in (A); lines 1a, b, 2a, b and 3a, b – show the quantity of genomic

13 

DNA after two different whole genome amplifications from the same sample.

14  15 

References

16  17  18 

Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, T., 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815.

19  20  21  22 

Arai, M., Billker, O., Morris, H.R., Panico, M., Delcroix, M., Dixon, D., Ley, S.V., Sinden, R.E., 2001. Both mosquito-derived xanthurenic acid and a host bloodderived factor regulate gametogenesis of Plasmodium in the midgut of the mosquito. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 116, 17–24.

23  24  25 

Austin, C.C., Perkins, S.L., 2006. Parasites in a biodiversity hotspot: a survey of hematozoa and a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Plasmodium in New Guinea skinks. J. Parasitol. 92, 770–777.

26  27 

Ball, G.H., 1964. In vitro culture of the mosquito phase of avian malaria. J. Parasitol. 50, 3–10.

28  29 

Ball, G.H., Chao, J., 1961. Infectivity to canaries of sporozoites of Plasmodium relictum developing in vitro. J. Parasitol. 47, 787–790.

30  31  32  33 

Beadell, J.S., Ishtiaq, F., Covas, R., Melo, M., Warren, B.H., Atkinson, C.T., Bensch, S., Graves, G.R., Jhala, Y.V., Peirce, M. a, Rahmani, A.R., Fonseca, D.M., Fleischer, R.C., 2006. Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii’s avian malaria. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 273, 2935–2944.

13

1  2  3 

Bensch, S., Hellgren, O., Pérez-Tris, J., 2009. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 1353–1358.

4  5  6 

Bensch, S., Pérez-Tris, J., Waldenström, J., Hellgren, O., 2004. Linkage between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences in avian malaria parasites: multiple cases of cryptic speciation? Evolution 58, 1617–1621.

7  8  9  10 

Bensch, S., Stjernman, M., Hasselquist, D., Ostman, O., Hansson, B., Westerdahl, H., Pinheiro, R.T., 2000. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 267, 1583–1589.

11  12 

Carlton, J., Silva, J., Hall, N., 2005. The genome of model malaria parasites, and comparative genomics. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7, 23–37.

13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22 

Carlton, J.M., Angiuoli, S.V., Suh, B.B., Kooij, T.W., Pertea, M., Silva, J.C., Ermolaeva, M.D., Allen, J.E., Selengut, J.D., Koo, H.L., Peterson, J.D., Pop, M., Kosack, D.S., Shumway, M.F., Bidwell, S.L., Shallom, S.J., van Aken, S.E., Riedmuller, S.B., Feldblyum, T.V., Cho, J.K., Quackenbush, J., Sedegah, M., Shoaibi, A., Cummings, L.M., Florens, L., Yates, J.R., Raine, J.D., Sinden, R.E., Harris, M.A., Cunningham, D.A., Preiser, P.R., Bergman, L.W., Vaidya, A.B., van Lin, L.H., Janse, C.J., Waters, A.P., Smith, H.O., White, O.R., Salzberg, S.L., Venter, J.C., Fraser, C.M., Hoffman, S.L., Gardner, M.J., Carucci, D.J., 2002. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii yoelii. Nature 419, 512–519.

23  24  25  26 

Coatney, G.R., Cooper, W.C., Eddy, N.B., Greenbeeg, J., 1953. Survey of Antimalarial Agents. Chemotherapy of Plasmodium gallinaceum Infections; Toxicity; Correlation of Structure and Action., 9th ed. Public Health Monograph, Washington.

27 

Davey, D.G., 1951. Chemotherapy of malaria. Brit. Med. Bull. 8.

28  29 

DeBarry, J.D., Kissinger, J.C., 2011. Jumbled genomes: missing Apicomplexan synteny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2855–2871.

30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38 

Gardner, M.J., Hall, N., Fung, E., White, O., Berriman, M., Hyman, R.W., Carlton, J.M., Pain, A., Nelson, K.E., Bowman, S., Paulsen, I.T., James, K., Eisen, J. a, Rutherford, K., Salzberg, S.L., Craig, A., Kyes, S., Chan, M.-S., Nene, V., Shallom, S.J., Suh, B., Peterson, J., Angiuoli, S., Pertea, M., Allen, J., Selengut, J., Haft, D., Mather, M.W., Vaidya, A.B., Martin, D.M. a, Fairlamb, A.H., Fraunholz, M.J., Roos, D.S., Ralph, S. a, McFadden, G.I., Cummings, L.M., Subramanian, G.M., Mungall, C., Venter, J.C., Carucci, D.J., Hoffman, S.L., Newbold, C., Davis, R.W., Fraser, C.M., Barrell, B., 2002. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419, 498–511.

39  40 

Garnham, P.C.C., 1966. Malaria Parasites and other Haemosporidia. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford.

41  42 

Godfrey, R.D., Fedynich, A.M., Pence, D.B., 1987. Quantification of hematozoa in blood smears. J. Wildl. Dis. 23, 558–565.

43  44  45 

Graczyk, T.K., Cranfield, M.R., Shiff, C.J., 1994. Extraction of Haemoproteus columbae (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) antigen from rock dove pigeons (Columba livia) and its use in an antibody ELISA. J. Parasitol. 80, 713–718.

14

1  2  3 

Hall, A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program of Windows 95/98/NT, in: Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. pp. 95– 98.

4  5  6 

Hellgren, O., Waldenström, J., Bensch, S., 2004. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J. Parasitol. 90, 797–802.

7  8  9 

Janssen, C.S., Barrett, M.P., Lawson, D., Quail, M.A., Harris, D., Bowman, S., Phillips, R.S., Turner, C.M.R., 2001. Gene discovery in Plasmodium chabaudi by genome survey sequencing. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 113, 251–260.

10  11  12 

Knowles, S.C.L., Palinauskas, V., Sheldon, B.C., 2010. Chronic malaria infections increase family inequalities and reduce parental fitness: experimental evidence from a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 557–569.

13  14 

Lander, E.S., Linton, L.M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M.C., et al., 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921.

15  16  17 

Levin, I.I., Outlaw, D.C., Vargas, F.H., Parker, P.G., 2009. Plasmodium blood parasite found in endangered Galapagos penguins (Spheniscus mendiculus). Biol. Conserv. 142, 3191–3195.

18  19  20 

Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W.E., Attiya, S., Bader, J.S., et al., 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376–380.

21  22  23 

Martinsen, E.S., Perkins, S.L., Schall, J.J., 2008. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of lifehistory traits and host switches. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 47, 261–273.

24  25  26  27  28  29  30 

Marzal, A., Ricklefs, R.E., Valkiūnas, G., Albayrak, T., Arriero, E., Bonneaud, C., Czirják, G. a., Ewen, J., Hellgren, O., Hořáková, D., Iezhova, T. a, Jensen, H., Križanauskienė, A., Lima, M.R., de Lope, F., Magnussen, E., Martin, L.B., Møller, A.P., Palinauskas, V., Pap, P.L., Pérez-Tris, J., Sehgal, R.N.M., Soler, M., Szöllősi, E., Westerdahl, H., Zetindjiev, P., Bensch, S., 2011. Diversity, Loss, and Gain of Malaria Parasites in a Globally Invasive Bird. PLoS ONE 6, e21905.

31  32 

McGhee, R.B., Singh, S.D., Weathersby, A.B., 1977. Plasmodium gallinaceum: Vaccination in chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 43, 231–238.

33  34 

Outlaw, D.C., Ricklefs, R.E., 2010. Comparative gene evolution in haemosporidian (Apicomplexa) parasites of birds and mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 537–542.

35  36  37 

Pain, A., Böhme, U., Berry, A.E., Mungall, K., Finn, R.D., et al., 2008. The genome of the simian and human malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Nature 455, 799–803.

38  39  40 

Palinauskas, V., Dolnik, O.V., Valkiūnas, G., Bensch, S., 2010. Laser microdissection microscopy and single cell PCR of avian hemosporidians. J. Parasitol. 96, 420– 424.

41  42  43 

Palinauskas, V., Valkiūnas, G., Bolshakov, C.V., Bensch, S., 2008. Plasmodium relictum (lineage P-SGS1): effects on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp. Parasitol. 120, 372–380.

44  45 

Perkins, S.L., 2000. Species concepts and malaria parasites: detecting a cryptic species of Plasmodium. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 267, 2345–2350.

15

1  2  3 

Perkins, S.L., 2008. Molecular systematics of the three mitochondrial protein-coding genes of malaria parasites : Corroborative and new evidence for the origins of human malaria. Mitochondrial DNA 19, 471–478.

4  5  6 

Pick, C., Ebersberger, I., Spielmann, T., Bruchhaus, I., Burmester, T., 2011. Phylogenomic analyses of malaria parasites and evolution of their exported proteins. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 167.

7  8  9 

Ricklefs, R.E., Fallon, S.M., Bermingham, E., 2004. Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Syst. Biol. 53, 111– 119.

10  11 

Ricklefs, R.E., Outlaw, D.C., 2010. A molecular clock for malaria parasites. Science 329, 226–229.

12  13  14 

Sinden, R.E., 1998. Gametogenesis and sexual development, in: Sherman, I.W. (Ed.), Malaria: Parasite biology, pathogenesis, and protection. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, pp. 25–48.

15  16  17 

Trager, W., 1950. Studies on the extracellular cultivation of an intracellular parasite (avian malaria). I. Development of the organisms in erythrocyte extracts, and the favoring effect of adenosinetriphosphate. J. Exp. Med. 92, 349–366.

18  19 

Valkiūnas, G., 2005. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia, America. CRC Press.

20  21  22 

Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T.A., Križanauskienė, A., Palinauskas, V., Bensch, S., 2008a. In vitro hybridization of Haemoproteus spp.: an experimental approach for direct investigation of reproductive isolation of parasites. J. Parasitol. 94, 1385–1394.

23  24  25 

Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T. a, Križanauskienė, A., Palinauskas, V., Sehgal, R.N.M., Bensch, S., 2008b. A comparative analysis of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods for blood parasites. J. Parasitol. 94, 1395–1401.

26  27  28  29 

Valkiūnas, G., Palinauskas, V., Asta Križanauskienė, A., Bernotienė, R., Rita Kazlauskienė, R., Iezhova, T.A., 2012. Further observations on in vitro hybridization of hemosporidian parasites: patterns of ookinete development in Haemoproteus spp. J. Parasitol. DOI: 10.1645/GE-3226.1.

30  31 

Waltari, E., Edwards, S.V., 2002. Evolutionary dynamics of intron size, genome size, and physiological correlates in archosaurs. Am. Nat. 160, 539–552.

32  33 

Warren, W.C., Clayton, D.F., Ellegren, H., Arnold, A.P., Hillier, L.W., et al., 2010. The genome of a songbird. Nature 464, 757–762.

34  35  36  37  38 

Zehtindjiev, P., Križanauskienė, A., Bensch, S., Palinauskas, V., Asghar, M., Dimitrov, D., Scebba, S., Valkiūnas, G., 2012. A new morphologically distinct avian malaria parasite that fails detection by established polymerase chain reaction-based protocols for amplification of the cytochrome B gene. J. Parasitol. 98, 657–665.

39 

16

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 

Unique biology of haemosporidians provides approaching purified template for genomic studies.  Separation of host and parasite DNA based on exflagellation avoids lyses of blood cells. Recommendation for De novo sequencing template preparation of avian and lizard haemosporidian parasites.    

17

1  2  3 

Table 1. Samples used for Haemoproteus tartakovskyi template preparation.

4  5  Experiment no.

Parasitemia in donor birds (%)

a

b

Amount of plasma (µl)

No of microgametes

c

d

The size of 1µl plasma drop (fields)

Approximate no of microgametes in 1µl of plasma

DNA before amplification (ng/µl)

DNA after6  amplification 7  (ng/µl)

e



1

5

40

38.5±26.1

100

3850

0.26

>30

2

2

20

10.1±9.8

160

1616

0.13

3

4

50

3.5±1.8

200

700

0.06

~6 10  ~12 11 

9  a

- amount of plasma

12 

discarded after centrifugation;

13 

b

- number of microgametes in one microscopic field (×1000 magnification) after centrifugation (the arithmetic mean followed by and standard deviation);

14 

c

- number of microscopic fields (×1000 magnification) in smears prepared using 1 drop (1µl) of plasma;

15 

d

- amount of DNA before amplification in comparison to Λ marker;

16 

e

- amount of DNA after whole genome amplification in comparison to Λ marker.

17 

18

Figure 1

Figure 2

*Graphical Abstract (for review)