T.trahedren LottorsNo.18,pp. w%196e, Printedin Groat Britain.
1966. Port”=
Pm*0 Ltd.
AAEWMETBaDCFRINl3~ANSICH Roy
chevron
Wetid,
c.
De 2elms
c!habsl
W.ifamia, U.S.A.
(~oooired5 ?obnwy
Cu~ml or
canpnny
1966)
of eerbooyulio ring synthesis have been the subjeat
methods
(11 Tkb adventof aarbeu~~(~) aousiderabls study. and relsted(3)
aynt.heae~of three-msmberedringshas fwusedreoentattentloninthis
area onthe utll%zatlonoftk3e intervmdic4testoeqandrin.gsbyoneaarbonunits. No%mofthethree~redrlngexpansionmetlMsthus far developedcouldbeoonsideredasbelngof gplurelsynthetla utility (4) dlfflaultylnp-eparatialof due to oompetlngside resotlons,
StArtiq
(6) mEtarlalr,(5) or inherent llmitatlans In theircthemlstry. b nowreport anw~~oithree~eMdringopeningsldone_ ocCbon,ringenlargenlent. Ths procedureemploysndldoondltions, inapredlutabls-1,
proneeds
sndas far as It hasbeen iawsti@tedls not
subjeotto tlm above-ntioned limitations.&he~~Iexempliiiesthe methodwith the exemplesw have studled. ReadIlyavaIlable ketoneswre essilyoonvertedtotheenolesters (I) by the methodof E8gmmyer and EulLt7)
Pretiou reaationsofdiohloro-
(8) Eouever,w carbenewith enolestershsve been ratherdlsaouraging. were able to obtainyieldsor 25 to 50% in the presentlnstsnceswlthout attemptsor optimi%ation.(9) The aoetoxy-ge=diohyalopropsnes, II, ontrea~ntdtha
sll@texaess of lithiumrlumtnumhydrlde in ether at
1965
1966
No.18
(Id (rva)l"
(b2081.1
(b2053')
R / 0ccH3 + NaCCCC13
WCH2CH&M8
P
&Y, 2.5 brs.
-4 oii
/&
n 5 3 (II,b. o7 61'; m, (11)
0.
n
=
bo.03 53') . 4 (II,b3-4 111.;I'JJ boa3 53-5.)
8. n - 5 (II,b2 105';I'J, boBu 63-5")
c\ /c-c1 L?
(IV) (50 to l_
b.
yield)
a. 11I 6 (II,bl 109-X!*; N, bl lC'0.5-l"1")
No.18
1968 intarmbiataIII warrnot Isolateddnae yIeldedmixtures aontainiugonly
II
rduatioa
partial
aperiasnta
andIV. Ituastbsrafazaaonoludsd
that if III had exiated, it must hava raaatedwithl.ithlumalusdnum faster
hydride atamuoh
lha
auth0rwishes
teohiaalaSSiStanoe
rate thaatha eaerespouding II.
to exprefw his gratitudS t0 bfra. 'pbn-llbnL%nfOr and
to
Dr. L
P. Lbdamnof
Cimvrc41ResearahCorpo-
ration for obtal&ngauddlsousslngthsMM2 spetxa.
(1) (2) Reaentlyravlewdin:
byA. T. Rlmqul6t,Aoede111Io Pram, BCW YCar g&
(3)
H.
gg+
g&.,
(RLSwul
KOw
co.1 &
1 (19w.
E. 8lnm~ and R. D. Smith,J. Am. Chem.LOO.,8& 4256 (1959).
ICsren Km& (4) w. IL ~~ham, R. W. &edar, J. R. Tnroalrrmorton, R. 1. D+son, ibid.,8JJ 321 (1565).
and
86 2653 (1964). (5) C. H. De Puy and L. R. Mihcmey,ibid.,Q=., 28 2206 (1963); (6) R, D. De &ha and C. 16 Cabs, J. Crhrg. J. Wol$mby, D. Cjmn,and R. I'Iovak, cham & Ipd.5 (1965). Jr. and D. C. Hull,Jnd. %R. Chem.,& (7) H. J. Hagsmeyer,
2920 (1949).
and 8. Van Der Van, Rec. trav.ohim. (8) W. M. Wa@wr, H. Kloosterziel, 3 740 (1961);C. E, Cook and IL E. Wall,Cham.& Ind.,1927 (1963). (9)
extensiveanddetaIled ~~SOUSS~O~ Of this reaoti~nwlllbe reportedslsewhere.Au alternateapproemhis suggestedin the potentialuse of the trihalamthylmro ma nts developedbyD. 8e@erth St&., J. &II,~hem.SCQ.,8 u%?59 f&G). W compounds reportedhem wma pure by0I.Cand e9 a~~~+ntal. analySeS. Amore
J. Oes. Chem.U.8.8.R.,& 658 (1937). (10)D. v. l5shahenk0, (U
E. Berm,
J. Or& Chem.,3 -
=C
(1963).