Accepted Manuscript A new scripting library for modeling flow and transport in fractured rock with channel networks Benoît Dessirier, Chin-Fu Tsang, Auli Niemi PII:
S0098-3004(17)30456-9
DOI:
10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.013
Reference:
CAGEO 4054
To appear in:
Computers and Geosciences
Received Date: 20 April 2017 Revised Date:
6 November 2017
Accepted Date: 11 November 2017
Please cite this article as: Dessirier, Benoî., Tsang, C.-F., Niemi, A., A new scripting library for modeling flow and transport in fractured rock with channel networks, Computers and Geosciences (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.013. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3 4
Benoît Dessiriera,*, Chin-Fu Tsanga,b, Auli Niemia
6
*
corresponding author
7
a
Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, Uppsala, Sweden
8
b
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
9
[email protected]
10
[email protected]
11
[email protected]
M AN U
5
RI PT
2
Manuscript: A new scripting library for modeling flow and transport in fractured rock with channel networks
SC
1
12
Abstract:
14
Deep crystalline bedrock formations are targeted to host spent nuclear fuel owing to their overall low
15
permeability. They are however highly heterogeneous and only a few preferential paths pertaining to a
16
small set of dominant rock fractures usually carry most of the flow or mass fluxes, a behavior known as
17
channeling that needs to be accounted for in the performance assessment of repositories. Channel
18
network models have been developed and used to investigate the effect of channeling. They are usually
19
simpler than discrete fracture networks based on rock fracture mappings and rely on idealized full or
20
sparsely populated lattices of channels. This study reexamines the fundamental parameter structure
21
required to describe a channel network in terms of groundwater flow and solute transport, leading to an
22
extended description suitable for unstructured arbitrary networks of channels. An implementation of
23
this formalism in a Python scripting library is presented and released along with this article. A new
24
algebraic multigrid preconditioner delivers a significant speedup in the flow solution step compared to
AC C
EP
TE D
13
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
previous channel network codes. 3D visualization is readily available for verification and interpretation
26
of the results by exporting the results to an open and free dedicated software. The new code is applied
27
to three example cases to verify its results on full uncorrelated lattices of channels, sparsely populated
28
percolation lattices and to exemplify the use of unstructured networks to accommodate knowledge on
29
local rock fractures.
30
Keywords: channel network, groundwater flow, solute transport, graph theory
SC
31
RI PT
25
1. Introduction
Groundwater flow and solute transport in deep crystalline bedrock are central to the safety assessment
33
of deep underground applications such as geological waste disposal (Pusch, 2009; Tsang et al., 2015).
34
These deep formations have generally undergone some degree of fracturing during their geological
35
history and exhibit a highly heterogeneous and anisotropic permeability field related to the embedded
36
network of rock fractures.
37
The mean transmissivity varies widely between fractures at the scale of the network (Dverstorp et al. ,
38
1992). Consequently, the large-scale flow through a network of fractures is usually focused on a limited
39
number of channels formed by a small subset of fractures with high transmissivities (Neretnieks et al.,
40
1982; Tsang and Neretnieks, 1989; Tsang and Tsang, 1989), sometimes called the backbone of the
41
network (e.g. Aldrich et al., 2017). Besides this large-scale channeling effect, in each flowing fracture,
42
the local aperture variability, in particular under confining stress, has also been shown to lead to
43
preferential flow pathways, resulting in flow channeling, this time at the scale of a single fracture (de
44
Dreuzy et al., 2012; Ishibashi et al., 2015; Kang et al., 2016; Larsson et al., 2012; Tsang and Tsang, 1989).
45
Flow channeling has been proposed as a direct cause for anomalous transport (Nowamooz et al., 2013;
46
Kang et al., 2016; Tsang and Neretnieks, 1998) and makes it difficult as well to precisely estimate the
47
flow-wetted surface, i.e. the surface of rock in contact with actively flowing groundwater, which directly
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
32
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
regulates solute retardation through diffusion and sorption inside the rock matrix (Gylling et al., 1999;
49
Neretnieks, 1987), two other processes leading to anomalous transport (Carrera et al., 1998).
50
Conceptual models for groundwater flow and transport in fractured rock are built in practice by
51
upscaling the hydraulic rock properties considering different data/information supports (Selroos et al.,
52
2002). Stochastic continua assume permeability values distributed on a volumetric grid thus assuming
53
full connectivity within the grid blocks (Tsang et al., 1996). Discrete fracture networks (DFN) use thin
54
plates as the basic flowing units (e.g. de Dreuzy et al., 2012; Dverstorp et al., 1992; Hyman et al., 2015).
55
Channel networks consider linear, possibly tortuous, preferential paths to be the representative flowing
56
units (Gylling et al., 1999; Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993). This latter approach relies traditionally on a
57
lattice structure with binary or lognormally distributed lattice bond properties to calculate a steady state
58
flow solution (Black et al. 2016; Figueiredo et al., 2016; Margolin et al. 1998; Moreno and Neretnieks,
59
1993). The solute transport is then calculated often by a particle-tracking technique and assuming a one-
60
dimensional advection equation in the channels with retardation by diffusion and sorption in the
61
adjacent rock matrix (Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993). Different conceptualizations of the rock matrix, in
62
terms of thickness reachable by transport and layering, can lead to analytical solutions in the Laplace
63
domain (Mahmoudzadeh et al., 2013; Moreno and Crawford, 2009) and sometimes directly in the time
64
domain (Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993), which keeps the computational cost low and enables rapid
65
calculations even on a regular desktop computer.
66
The channel network approach has been successfully applied to describe tracer test experiments at
67
kilometer scale, such as the long-term pumping test (LPT2) at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory in
68
southeastern Sweden (Gylling et al., 1998), and at the tunnel scale (10-100 meters), such as the tracer
69
retention understanding experiment (TRUE) also at Äspö (Gylling et al., 1999). More recent
70
developments, have been focused on the quantification of the impact of solute diffusion into stagnant
71
water zones around the flowing channels (Mahmoudzadeh et al., 2013; Shahkarami et al., 2016) and the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
48
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
treatment of whole decay chains of tracers (Mahmoudzadeh et al., 2014, 2016; Shahkarami et al., 2015).
73
Black et al. (2016) also used percolation networks based on sparsely populated lattices of channels to
74
propose an explanation to the so-called positive skin effect around tunnels, i.e. a reduced tunnel inflow
75
compared with radially convergent (two-dimensional) flow which is usually interpreted as an additional
76
head drop near the tunnel wall. They showed that sparse networks of long channels just above the
77
percolation threshold exhibit behavior consistent with the observed positive skin effect (Black et al.,
78
2016).
79
Although very versatile and physically consistent with the observed channeling effect, the channel
80
network approach comes at the cost of some level of abstraction because channel network properties
81
(lattice spacing, conductance, aperture, flow wetted surface) can only indirectly be inferred by the
82
number of inflow points on tunnel walls or transmissivity distributions in borehole segments (Gylling et
83
al., 1999; Neretnieks, 1987). First order estimates of the parameter distributions for the channel
84
network model are usually obtained by considering additional assumptions, e.g. a cubic lattice
85
arrangement of the channels (Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993). Channel conductances and lattice spacing
86
have been linked for example to transmissivity distributions in borehole intervals (Moreno and
87
Neretnieks, 1993). The estimation rule for flow wetted surface from Gylling et al. (1999) relies however
88
on channels being uniformly oriented in space. Black et al. (2016) indicate that the two basic parameters
89
underlying their network generator are related to the mean fracture trace length and fracture intensity
90
respectively but do not elaborate on potential functional relationships.
91
While it has helped to define simple generators for stochastic channel network realizations and
92
demonstrated the versatility of the channel network approach, the lattice topology has also limited the
93
flexibility and ability to include deterministic features without a cumbersome mapping procedure. In the
94
case of spatially uncorrelated conductances, the lattice spacing acts de-facto as the mean correlation
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
72
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
length for the network, whereas it becomes the model resolution while mapping deterministic features
96
such as tunnels and fracture zones.
97
To generalize some of the modeling techniques routinely applied to lattice networks of channels, the
98
present study starts with a general reflection on the data structure adequate to describe an
99
unstructured channel network, i.e. a network without any specific assumption on the position of the
100
nodes (channel intersections) or the connectivity between nodes (channels). This will show that the
101
existing methods for treating lattice networks can be extended to arbitrary network topologies and
102
geometries. This paper then introduces a new open-source scripting library, Pychan3d, based on the
103
new extended formalism and suitable to represent unstructured channel networks and shows significant
104
gains in computing time obtained by using algebraic multigrid preconditioners rather than more
105
traditional ones based incomplete LU factorization. Two examples of applications are given as
106
verification cases against the existing lattice-based channel network codes of Gylling et al. (1999) and
107
Black et al. (2016). A third and final example illustrates some new capabilities for building a custom
108
channel network based on an a priori fracture geometry which could originate from a conceptual
109
geological model or from a realization of a discrete fracture network model.
SC
M AN U
TE D
2. Methods
EP
110
RI PT
95
This section presents an analysis of the basic requirement to define a channel network with regard to
112
the steady-state flow problem and the solute transport problem respectively. In each case the
113
corresponding implementation in the new software library Pychan3d is also briefly described.
114
2.1 Steady-state flow network
115
In terms of flow, a single channel between two channel intersections can be represented by its
116
conductance C, a single parameter that lumps the influences of its average conductivity K and its
AC C
111
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
117
geometry (cross-section A and length L), through the following relationship (Moreno and Neretnieks,
118
1993):
120
×
(1).
RI PT
=
119
The flow rate through the channel Q can then be calculated by Darcy’s law: =
121
× ∆ℎ
(2)
with C the previously defined conductance and ∆h the hydraulic head difference between the
123
extremities of the channel. To completely define the steady state flow problem, one needs to know the
124
topology of the network, i.e. the connectivity map between channels, the conductance of each channel
125
and the boundary conditions.
126
From the mathematical stand point, a channel network can thus be represented by a flow graph where
127
the nodes of the graph are the channel intersections and the edges of the graph are channels
128
characterized by their conductances (Li et al., 2014). Solving the flow problem consists of solving a
129
sparse system:
M AN U
TE D
× ℎ =
(3)
EP
130
SC
122
where h is the vector of unknown heads at the channel intersections, the symmetric positive definite
132
matrix M is the Laplacian matrix of the conductance graph and has the generic term:
133 134
AC C
131
(
( ) = ∑
)
= − +
(4a)
,
×
!
(4b)
135
with Cij the conductance of the channel between nodes i and j, δDirichlet, i is an indicator function equal to
136
1 at nodes where a fixed head boundary condition is in place and equal to 0 elsewhere, Cbnd is an
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
137
arbitrary constant with a value significantly larger than all conductances in the system, and b is a sparse
138
vector of boundary conditions with general term: =
,
×
!
×ℎ
!,
+
" #$% ,
×&
!,
(5)
RI PT
139
where δNeuman, i is an indicator function for nodes with a prescribed flow boundary condition, hbnd, i and
141
qbnd, i are the applied head or flow values at the boundaries. Simultaneously prescribing head and flux in
142
this case yields a Robin boundary condition (3rd kind) in which case Cbnd is a weight factor that
143
corresponds to the conductance of the insulating layer.
144
It appears clearly from this graph representation that the lattice topology used by previous channel
145
networks (e.g. Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993) is a means to generate and parametrize stochastic
146
networks but is not a necessary assumption to build the graph representation of channel networks.
147
Once a flow solution has been obtained and a groundwater head value has been associated to each
148
channel intersection, the graph defined by the channel intersections as nodes and the channels oriented
149
by the flow direction as edges is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) over which the values of groundwater
150
heads at the nodes provide a partial topological order.
151
The new code Pychan3d is developed as a Python package with dependencies on the Numpy and Scipy
152
modules to allow easy portability and rapid code development (Figure 1). A scripting approach is
153
adopted, whereby the user builds a script, i.e. a list of consecutive operations of data or model
154
management. This approach is in line with a current trend in computational geosciences (e.g. Bakker et
155
al. 2016; Croucher, 2011). The scripting approach has the advantage to preserve an integral trace of the
156
modeling procedure as well as shortening the development cycle by avoiding the huge effort that is the
157
development and maintenance of a decent quality graphical user interface. Unstructured flow networks
158
are implemented as a main Python class. To initialize a network, one needs an array of nodes (size Nn)
159
and a sparse matrix of dimension (NnxNn) with Nc non-zero entries each corresponding to a channel. The
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
140
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
entry on row i and column j is the conductance between nodes i and j. The nodes are represented by
161
their three-dimensional coordinates, which can be used for visualization purposes via an optional
162
dependency on the vtk package, but the node coordinates have no bearing on the flow solution. Two
163
additional sparse arrays (of dimension Nn) corresponding to the Dirichlet and Neuman boundary
164
conditions at each node are required to completely define the flow problem. Two subclasses are
165
provided for convenience and for testing that correspond respectively to the full lattice network
166
parametrization (Gylling et al., 1999; Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993) and the sparse lattice network
167
parametrization (Black et al., 2007; Margolin et al., 1998). In each case, the lattice network is generated
168
and then internally translated into the generic form previously described.
EP
169
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
160
Figure 1: Modeling workflow and dependencies of Pychan3d.
171
Irrespective of the network type, the flow solution can be obtained by several types of solvers (Figure 1,
172
Table 1). The first one is available through Scipy as a wrapper of the serial SuperLU library, which
173
provides a direct solver. It is unconditionally stable and suitable for small network (Nn and Nc < 105),
174
which is interesting for testing and for sparse networks. The second solver is based on an additional
175
package Pyamg which offers Algebraic Multi-Grid (AMG) solvers and preconditioners (Bell et al., 2013). A
176
classic AMG preconditioner is built using the system matrix M and then used to solve the flow problem
AC C
170
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
with a preconditioned conjugate gradient solver from the Scipy library. On a single core, this new
178
preconditioner is shown to greatly reduce the time required to obtain the flow solution in comparison
179
with the more commonly used preconditioner based on an incomplete LU (ILU) factorization used by
180
Gylling et al. (1999) (see upcoming section 3.1 Full Lattice Network), a result consistent with the
181
observations of Dreuzy et al. (2013). Pychan3d has also been successfully linked to the PETSc library
182
(Balay et al., 2016) through Python bindings available via two additional packages, namely mpi4py and
183
petsc4py (Dalcin et al, 2011). PETSc includes parallel algorithms for building block ILU or AMG
184
preconditioners and parallel iterative solvers. Adequate graph partitioning is available thanks to the
185
Pymetis bindings to the program METIS (Karypis and Kumar, 1998).
186
One set of utilities is provided to carve different domain shapes such as spheres, cylinders or arbitrary
187
convex shapes to represent tunnels or outer domain shapes and help assign corresponding boundary
188
conditions (Table 1). Another utility is also available to identify percolating clusters of channels between
189
two sets of nodes prior to calculating the flow solution, which allows to trim disconnected channels as
190
well (Table 1). Networks and their corresponding flow solution or percolating clusters can easily be
191
exported to vkt file formats for quick visualization and control of the output with the external open
192
visualization software Paraview (Ahrens et al, 2005; Table 1).
193
Table 1: comparison of code functionalities for CHAN3D (Gylling et al., 1999), Hyperconv (Black et al., 2006) and Pychan3d.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
177
Functionality
CHAN3D
HyperConv
Pychan3d
(Gylling et al.,
(Black et al.,
This article
1999)
2016)
Supported network types -
Full Lattice networks
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Sparse Lattice networks
No
Yes
Yes
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Unstructured networks
No
No
Yes
Percolation-check/trimming
Not relevant
Yes
Yes
Independent clusters analysis
Not relevant
Yes
Yes
Carving utilities (cylinder, sphere, convex)
Presumed No
Yes
Yes
XYZ-plane boundary conditions
Yes
Yes
Distributed boundary conditions
Yes,
Presumed.
Steady-state flow solution:
-
-
Direct solver
No
Serial iterative preconditioned
Unknown
Yes,
TE D
-
M AN U
needed if #>50.
Yes Yes
SC
recompilation
RI PT
-
Yes (Serial, small networks: Nc < 105)
Yes,
Yes,
conjugate gradient solver
ILU precond.
ICC precond.
AMG precond.
Parallel iterative solvers and
No
No
Yes, if PETSc installed, optional
AC C
EP
preconditioners
graph partitioning with METIS
Transport (Particle-tracking): -
Mixing rules at intersections
Perfect mixing
N/A
Perfect mixing
Channel types
Plug flow
N/A
Plug flow
Sorption/Diffusion
Sorption/Diffusion
in infinite matrix
in infinite matrix
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Sorption/Diffusion
in finite matrix
in finite matrix
Sorption/Diffusion
(under test)
in layered matrix
Sorption/Diffusion
RI PT
Sorption/Diffusion
in layered matrix (under test)
-
Flow solution
Partial, MATLAB
SC
3D Visualization: Yes,
Full, Paraview
M AN U
dedicated program.
-
Particle-tracking
Partial, MATLAB
194
No transport
Full, Paraview
2.2 The transport problem
196
The solute transport problem over a flow network can be broken down in two parts: a mixing rule at
197
each node and a transport model in each channel. The simplest mixing rule is that of perfect mixing at all
198
nodes, which means that a hypothetical particle of solute gets to leave a node through a certain exit
199
channel with a probability equal to the outflow rate to this channel divided by the total throughflow at
200
that node (Berkowitz et al., 1994). Stream tube routing, in contrast, matches stream tubes between
201
entry and exit channels deterministically and mixing occurs only by diffusion between the stream tubes
202
at the intersection or later by diffusion along the exit channels if they result from the merger of stream
203
tubes from different entry channels (Berkowitz et al., 1994). Stream tube routing and perfect mixing are
204
the two ends of a spectrum of intermediate mixing behaviors. Using four-member orthogonal
205
intersections, Berkowitz et al. (1994) showed that the applicable mixing rule should theoretically be
206
decided according to the effective Peclet number at each intersection. Furthermore, based on two-
AC C
EP
TE D
195
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
dimensional square lattice networks, Kang et al. (2015) showed that the choice of the mixing rule can
208
have a significant impact on transverse dispersion in networks with low levels of heterogeneity, but
209
becomes insignificant for high levels of heterogeneity. Using two-dimensional networks with power-law
210
length distributions, Park et al. (2001) showed that the impact of the mixing rule is negligible in
211
networks with a low average coordination number (number of intersecting members at each node),
212
which is typically the case for sparse channel networks.
213
The transport model depends on the transport processes at work in the channel which is likely a
214
function of the channel geometry, but it may also depend on the layout and properties of the rock mass
215
around the channel and the type of particle being transported. In practical terms the transport model
216
determines a travel time probability distribution P(t) for the particle through this channel. The simplest
217
behavior would be to consider an inert particle that is only subject to advection within the channel in
218
which case the travel time distribution is:
M AN U
SC
RI PT
207
'(() = ()/ )
(6)
TE D
219
with δ the dirac delta function, V the channel volume and Q the channel flow rate. Another
221
configuration lending itself to an analytic solution is to consider that the particle is subject to advection
222
along the channel opening, diffusion into the pores of the adjacent rock matrix (perpendicularly to the
223
channel and with a matrix considered infinitely thick) and sorption on the channel wall and surfaces
224
inside the rock matrix (Moreno and Neretnieks, 1993). The corresponding travel time distribution is:
226
AC C
225
EP
220
'(() =
./0 12
×
'(() = 0 for ( ≤ - × )/
345
67(
89×:/2);
./0 1 ) 2
× exp (−(
×
(7a)
345 ? ) @( 89×:/2)
for ( > - × )/
(7b)
227
with R the surface retardation factor, V the volume of the channel, Q the channel flow rate (obtained
228
from the flow solution), FWS the flow-wetted surface (which can be decomposed as twice the product 12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
229
of the channel length L by the mean channel width W) and MPG the material property group that
230
describes the joint retardation due to diffusion and sorption in the rock matrix and that can be
231
decomposed as
232
matrix sorption coefficient and E the bulk density of the rock (Moreno and Crawford, 2009; Moreno
233
and Neretnieks, 1993). More elaborate configurations, that offer analytical solutions in the Laplace
234
space, can address more complexity such as a layered matrix with a finite extent (Mahmoudzadeh et al.,
235
2013, 2014, 2016; Moreno and Crawford, 2009), diffusion into stagnant water zones along the channel
236
(Mahmoudzadeh et al., 2013; Shahkarami et al., 2016).
237
As shown by the aforementioned relations for the travel time probabilities, solving the solute transport
238
problem requires more input or assumptions regarding the geometry of the channels and the properties
239
of the rock. At a minimum, the volume V of each channel is required to calculate the advective travel
240
time. If matrix diffusion and sorption are considered, one must also know the flow wetted surface FWS
241
and the material property group MPG. Transport is implemented in the new Python library by a particle
242
tracking technique and by the injection of a predefined number of particles. Each particle can be
243
assigned an entry node in the network between a list of specified injection nodes either uniformly ---
244
which is sometimes called resident injection --- or following a flux-weighted rule --- flux injection
245
(Frampton and Cvetkovic, 2009; Kang et al., 2017; Dagan, 2016). Resident injection corresponds to a
246
source that would release particles at a given fixed rate whereas flux injection is typical of a large source
247
operating at constant head (Dagan, 2016). Because it samples more densely areas of the source with
248
slowly flowing channels, resident injection produces longer tails for the travel time distribution than flux
249
injection (Frampton and Cvetkovic, 2009; Kang et al., 2017). This impact of the injection mode on
250
particle dispersion in the network increases with the degree of heterogeneity on the system (Frampton
251
and Cvetkovic, 2009). A piecewise linear concentration-time relationship for tracer injection can also be
252
used to assign an injection time to each particle, consistently with an injection profile from the field for
∗ !
× E with C the effective diffusivity of the rock matrix,
∗ !
the bulk
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
'B = 6C ×
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
example. The perfect mixing rule is implemented in Pychan3d at each node by a discrete random
254
variable generator giving the next visited node based on the calculated channel in- and outflow rates
255
and boundary conditions. The travel times along each channel segment are generated by randomly
256
sampling the selected travel time distribution based on the channel geometry and adjacent rock
257
parameters. As a result, each simulated particle is represented by an array of nodes through which it has
258
passed and an array of the corresponding times of passage. Routines are also included to export the
259
particles to VTK files for rapid visualization with Paraview (Ahrens et al., 2005) and diagnostics of the
260
particle injections (Table 1 and Supplementary material).
SC
M AN U
261
RI PT
253
3. Verification cases 3.1 Full lattice network (example 1)
263
As a first example, we used the newly implemented code to reproduce the flow solution over a lattice
264
network as parametrized in the predecessor CHAN3D (Gylling et al., 1999). The test domain is a cubic
265
lattice with a spacing of 1.5m and 60 nodes in each direction. Dirichlet boundary conditions (fixed head
266
values) are applied to two opposite faces of the lattice to obtain a unit average hydraulic gradient and
267
the four other faces are set to no-flow. This results to a network with 216,000 nodes, 637,200 channels
268
and 7,200 Dirichlet boundary conditions. The conductances were assumed to be lognormally distributed
269
and uncorrelated in space, so
270
example, we used the following values:
271
The flow solution was calculated for σ=0, which corresponds to uniform flow, and 10 stochastic
272
realizations of the channel network were built and solved for flow for σ=1 and σ=2 (Figure 2). Each
273
realization was solved with the original CHAN3D code, and with the two main solvers available in
274
Pychan3d (Table 2). The direct solver provides the accurate solution. The accuracy of the other solvers
275
was judged acceptable as the maximum error for the head solution relative the direct solution was kept
AC C
EP
TE D
262
=
F
× 10"×H , where N is a normal random variable. For this F
= 3.0 × 108KF
14
1
/L and values of σ ranging from 0 to 2.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
under 10-5 (Table 2). A comparison of the average solving times for similar levels of final residuals
277
obtained from the different solvers over each set of realizations are also presented in Table 2. The
278
results show that the direct solver from the Scipy library is not time efficient for a network of this size.
279
Separate tests showed that the solving time was kept under a minute for networks with less than 105
280
channels on the test desktop computer (Table 2). The iterative solver with the classical AMG
281
preconditioner, however, can handle large networks and deliver a significant speedup over CHAN3D,
282
both running in serial mode (Table 2).
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
276
283
Figure 2: Flow solution over Lattice networks for uniform channel conductances (left) and two realizations of conductances with
285
a lognormal distribution - σ=1 (center) and σ=2 (right). Note that a higher value of σ increases the contrast between the
286
channels with high and low flow rates (increased channeling).
287
Table 2: Mean total time for assembly and solve with different codes and solvers (for 10 realizations, tested on the same desktop
288
computer with processor Intel Xeon quadcore 4x3.30 GHz and 16 GB RAM). All runs converge and yield a solution with a
289
maximum relative error for the hydraulic head under 10 compared with the solution from the direct solver.
Code
AC C
EP
284
-5
CHAN3D
Pychan3d-direct
Pychan3d-iterative
Solver library
SLATEC
Scipy (SuperLU)
Pyamg+Scipy
σ=0
7.7 s
10 min
1.9 s
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11.1 s
9 min
3.5 s
σ=2
44.8 s
9 min
23.6 s
SC
RI PT
σ=1
M AN U
290
Figure 3: Flow through percolating clusters of channels (color scale) in sparse lattice network realizations for L=10 and PON=0.02
292
(left), PON=0.04 (center) and PON=0.08 (right). The non-percolating channel members are represented by semi-transparent black
293
segments. Notice the different scales for the flow rates.
294
3.2 Sparse lattice networks (example 2)
295
This example attempts a verification against the results on sparse lattice networks reported by Black et
296
al. (2016). The modeling domain is a cubic percolation lattice of binary conductive/non-conductive
297
bonds, populated by the following two probabilistic rules: considering two consecutive channels along
298
one of the lattice directions, the second one has a probability PN to be conductive if the previous one
299
was non-conductive and a probability PA to be open if the previous one was already conductive (Black et
300
al., 2016). This gives a corresponding bond density, or probability for a channel to be conductive,
301
PON=PN/(1-PA+PN) and an average length L=1/(1-PA) of consecutive conductive channels. Two parameters,
302
for example (L, PON), suffice to define the network generator. We used here the same domain
303
dimensions as Black et al. (2016) and as the previous example, with a lattice spacing of 1.5m and 60
304
nodes in each direction in three dimensions. The channel network generation was tested for mean
305
channel length values L ranging from 1.33 to 20 lattice spacings and for densities PON ranging from 10-3
AC C
EP
TE D
291
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
to 1 (Figure 3). Each conductive bond is assigned a conductance value of 3.0x10-10 m2/s as in Black et al.
307
(2016). Ensemble results were computed based on 500 realizations for each tested couple of values (L,
308
PON). Figure 4 shows the fraction of percolating realizations for the parameter values tested. For finite
309
size lattices, the percolation threshold can be approached by the average bond density at which 50% of
310
realizations percolate (Harter 2005). It is shown to agree with previous estimations of the percolation
311
threshold for single parameter percolation lattices (P=PON=PA=PN; Lorenz and Ziff, 1998; Figure 4 – star
312
symbol, P=0.2488). Figure 4 shows that percolation networks with long channels (L>1.33) have a lower
313
percolation threshold than the single parameter case, as previously reported by Black et al. (2016).
314
Although overall close to the values reported by Black et al. (2016), our estimates of the respective
315
percolation thresholds show some minor differences despite our best efforts to replicate their numerical
316
experiment (Figure 4). Part of these differences could well result from the interpolation between
317
different tested (L, PON) pairs or from the ensemble size, however further comparison between the two
318
codes would be in order to explain these differences.
319
Figure 3 illustrates the visualization capabilities for three network realizations with different bond
320
densities but the same mean channel length. One can see that the examples shown in the left and
321
central panel in Figure 3 are close to the estimated percolation threshold (Figure 4). They indeed exhibit
322
one and two sparse percolating clusters respectively. The realization shown in the right panel of Figure
323
3, however, is near the bond density where 100% of realizations percolate (Figure 4) and all flowing
324
channels have morphed into a single percolating cluster.
325
Figure 5 shows the equivalent conductivity of the lattice for the same ensembles of realizations. The
326
ensemble averages show good agreement with the values presented by Black et al. (2016). The
327
uncertainty on the ensemble permeability increases dramatically for very low-density values as the
328
number of percolating realizations reduces to a handful (Figure 5). For bond densities below 10-2, the
329
conductivity values form clusters around the values 5.65x10-14, 1.13x10-13 and 1.69x10-13 m/s which
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
306
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
respectively correspond to one, two and three straight channels crossing the lattice directly from the
331
inflow face to the outflow face.
EP
332
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
330
Figure 4: Percentage of percolating realizations for different parameter pairs (L, PON). Each dot is the average over 500
334
realizations. The error bars represent a 95% confidence interval estimated by resampling 1000 times from the corresponding
335
500 realizations (Efron and Tibshirani, 1994). The star shows previous estimates for the percolation threshold of a single
336
parameter percolation lattice (Lorenz and Ziff, 1998). The squares and dashed lines show values and interpolations reported by
337
Black et al. (2016) for two-parameter percolation lattices – each square representing the average of 100 realizations.
AC C
333
18
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
338 339
Figure 5: Mean value of the equivalent ensemble permeability (lines) of the percolating realizations for different parameter pairs
340
(L, PON). The left panel is reproduced from Black et al. (2016) . The right panel displays corresponding results from this study. In
341
the right panel, the crosses represent the single values obtained for each percolating realization, which shows the spread around
342
the ensemble means represented by the interpolated lines.
TE D
1
4. Connecting Discrete fracture networks to channel networks
343
(example 3)
EP
344
The graph representation underlying Pychan3d allows to add, delete or edit nodes and channels at any
346
location in the system. This last example presents a configuration that illustrates the gain in flexibility
347
with the new library and how it potentially helps to include information on rock fractures into the
348
channel network design without any mapping on a background lattice. Small Networks can be built from
349
scratch to test conceptual models consisting of a few fracture zones and boreholes. To demonstrate the
350
full range of flexibility of Pychan3d, we consider first a simple synthetic configuration, that can be
AC C
345
1
Published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
defined manually. It includes a cylindrical tunnel and three rock fractures in cascade (Figure 6). It is
352
assumed that the fracture intersections are very conductive, so that we represent them as a single
353
channel intersection where perfect mixing applies. For the sake of this example we assume further that
354
there are three parallel flowing channels in the fracture intersecting the tunnel (F1, Figure 6), four
355
parallel channels in the intermediate fracture (F2, Figure 6) and three channels in the fracture further
356
inside the rock mass (F3, Figure 6). These last three channels connect each to a different borehole that
357
penetrates this fracture, supplying a tracer source (shown with assorted colors: blue, red, green, Figure
358
6). We also consider an additional channel connecting to the intersection between fractures F2 and F3
359
that delivers a constant flow rate (inflowing Neumann boundary condition) and a channel connecting to
360
the intersection between fractures F1 and F2 that draws water away from the isolated network, also at a
361
constant flow rate (outflowing Neumann boundary condition). We assume that the hydraulic head is 0
362
at the tunnel wall and fixed to a single common value of 20m in the three boreholes. Conductances are
363
arbitrarily selected to achieve a significant contrast between parallel channels. For solute transport, we
364
assumed perfect mixing at the two fracture intersections, i.e. we consider for the sake of this example
365
that the fracture intersections form a very well connected hydraulic connector. This example
366
demonstrates the ability of the code to handle an arbitrary number of contributing channels at each
367
intersection, in this particular case eight channels, with seven channels proper and one Neuman
368
boundary condition at each intersection (Figure 6). In terms of transport model in each channel, we
369
assumed one-dimensional diffusion and possible sorption in the rock matrix as parametrized by Moreno
370
and Crawford (2009). For the channel lengths, we adopted the geometrical distance between
371
intersections. All channels have a width W of 0.2m and their aperture b is related to the calculated flow
372
rate through the cubic law (Witherspoon et al., 1980). The channel flow-wetted surface (FWS) is then
373
defined as FWS=2×L×W and the channel volume V as V=b×W×L. For matrix diffusion/sorption
374
parameters we show here the results for a surface retardation factor R=1 and a material property group
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
351
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MPG=2.0x10-8 m.s-1/2 which is representative of a non-sorbing tracer (matrix diffusion only) such as
376
Iodide in Äspö granite at approximately 400m depth (Moreno and Crawford, 2009). Cumulative
377
breakthrough curves for simultaneous pulse injections of 5000 particles in each of the three blue, red,
378
and green boreholes of Figure 6 are shown in Figure 7 by the matching colors (thick dashed curves). To
379
verify the accuracy of the new code, one can calculate the analytical transfer function of the network in
380
the Laplace space where the convolution of travel time distributions through successive channels
381
becomes the product of their Laplace transforms. The analytical cumulative recovery curve can then be
382
inverted back numerically to the time domain, using the De Hoog algorithm for example (De Hoog et al,
383
1982). These semi-analytical results are shown in Figure 7 as solid curves corresponding each to a
384
particle tracking dashed curve.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
375
21
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
385
Figure 6: Unstructured network model example: Tunnel in gray, fracture 1 in red, fracture 2 in pink, fracture 3 in turquoise. The
387
fully-mixed intersections are represented by thin gray cylinders and the channels are depicted by their steady-state flow rates
388
(color scale). The three boreholes are also shown in blue, red and green.
AC C
EP
TE D
386
22
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
389
Figure 7: cumulative mass recovery after four different injections in the unstructured network. Blue, red and green correspond to
391
simultaneous instant injections of 5000 particles in each of the three boreholes and considering channel transport models
392
including diffusion and sorption into the rock matrix (See also animation appended as supplementary material). The black curves
393
show the outcome of an injection in the green well but neglecting rock matrix interactions (purely advective transport). The final
394
mass loss is due to the outflowing Neumann boundary condition. The particle tracking results (Pychan3d - dashed lines) are
395
plotted against a numerical inversion of the solution in the Laplace domain (semi-analytical - solid lines).
396
The comparison between semi-analytical solution and the particle-based solution delivered by Pychan3d
397
shows only minor differences (Figure 7). The partial final recovery is due to the outflow boundary
398
condition applied the intersection between fractures F1 and F2. The mass loss in this case corresponds
399
exactly to the outflow rate (Figure 7). An injection in the green borehole was also simulated for purely
400
advective flow in the channels and appears in Figure 7 as the black set of curves (solid and dashed). Here
401
also the agreement between the two methods is very good.
402
If one has a larger DFN, i.e. a network of polygonal fractures, Pychan3d includes one simple routine
403
presented by Cacas et al. (1990) to convert this discrete fracture network into a corresponding channel
AC C
EP
TE D
390
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
network. This algorithm creates channels between the midpoints of all fracture intersection lines and
405
the center points of the fractures these connect. This simple method requires knowledge of the fracture
406
centers and average transmissivity as well as the midpoints of all fracture intersection lines. It can be
407
implemented very efficiently but potentially leads to some channels crossing other fracture intersection
408
lines without interaction which is not physically consistent. The design of an equivalent channel (or pipe)
409
network from a DFN has been and remains an active area of research (Dershowitz and Fidelibus, 1999;
410
Dershowitz et al., 1999; Xu et al., 2014). The effort has generally been to construct channel networks
411
that would yield flow results consistent with those of the complete DFN calculation but at a fraction of
412
the computational cost, and not on including channels as a physical phenomenon taking place in the
413
complex geometries of natural fracture networks. As such, the simple method of Cacas et al. (1990) is
414
provided here as a mere example of how to implement a transformation from DFN to channel network.
415
The broader vision for Pychan3d is to further develop methods for channel network design based on
416
DFN and test our understanding of fractured systems and the impact of channeling. For example, one
417
could test the impact of including fracture intersection lines as channels themselves connected within
418
each fracture planes by other channels the length, spacing and width of which could be based on
419
fracture aperture statistics (Larsson et al., 2012).
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
5. Conclusions
AC C
420
RI PT
404
421
This study promotes a graph representation for arbitrary unstructured channel networks to model flow
422
and solute transport in deep fractured crystalline rock. The new representation is more general than
423
previous lattice-based channel networks but can still fully include them as specific cases.
424
A new Python library implementing the new graph representation for channel networks, Pychan3d, is
425
presented and applied to three different example cases. The results obtained with the new code are in
426
conformity with results from previous codes for lattice networks (example 1; Gylling et al., 1999) and 24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
consistent with published results on percolation lattice networks (example 2, Black et al., 2016). The
428
new implementation uses a more efficient AMG preconditioner to solve the steady state flow problem,
429
resulting in a speedup by a factor two to three on a single core (example 1). The new code has also been
430
successfully linked to the high-performance computing library PETSc to support parallel solvers and
431
preconditioners if very large networks need to be simulated. The new code supports output to VTK file
432
formats which allows the user to quickly visualize the results with dedicated software, e.g. Paraview
433
(examples 1, 2 and 3). The last example illustrates the enhanced capability to directly model flow and
434
transport in networks with arbitrary numbers of channel members at each intersection, which is not
435
possible with previous lattice-based models without resorting to some mapping procedure. The new
436
library grants full control to manually define or customize channel networks and it includes an example
437
of a simple automated method to transform a DFN into a channel network. The Python language and
438
the scripting approach provide both speed and flexibility while building channel networks. The AMG
439
preconditioners and/or parallel solvers allow for rapid solutions which is a prerequisite for efficient
440
comparison between alternative models, global sensitivity analysis or simulating stochastic ensembles.
441
And the flexible graph representation is instrumental in the effort to build channel networks that would
442
conform to information on known rock fractures or observed fracture statistics. This new library,
443
Pychan3d, is thus a suitable platform to develop and test new channel networks for the modeling of
444
flow and transport in the deep subsurface.
445
Acknowledgments
446
This work was supported by the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM). The authors are grateful to
447
Björn Gylling, the creator of CHAN3D, for agreeing to share the original code and granting us permission
448
to use it. Our thanks go also to the three anonymous reviewers who helped significantly improve the
449
original manuscript.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
427
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
450
References
451 Ahrens, J., Geveci, B., Law, C., 2005. ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization,
Visualization Handbook, Elsevier, 717pp.
RI PT
452
453 Aldrich, G., Hyman, J., Karra, S., Gable, C., Makedonska, N., Viswanathan, H., Woodring, J. and
Hamann, B., 2016. Analysis and Visualization of Discrete Fracture Networks Using a Flow
455
Topology Graph. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics PP, no. 99: 1–1.
456
doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2582174.
SC
454
M AN U
457 Bakker, M., Post, V., Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J. D., White, J. T., Starn, J. J. and Fienen, M. N. 458
2016. Scripting MODFLOW model development using Python and FloPy. Groundwater 54,
459
no. 5 (2016): 733-739.
460 Balay S., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M.F., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Dalcin, L., Eijkhout,
V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M.G., Curfman McInnes L., Rupp, K., Smith, B.F.,
462
Zampini, S. and Zhang, H., 2016. PETSc User’s Manual, Argonne National Laboratory, ANL-
463
95/11 - Revision 3.7, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc
TE D
461
464 Bell W. N., Olson, L. N. and Schroder, J., 2013. PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python,
http://www.pyamg.org, Version 2.1
EP
465
AC C
466 Berkowitz, B., Naumann, C., Smith, L., 1994. Mass transfer at fracture intersections: An 467
evaluation of mixing models. Water Resources Research 30, 1765–1773.
468
doi:10.1029/94WR00432
469 Black, J. H., Robinson, P. C. and Barker, J. A., 2006. A Preliminary Investigation of the Concept 470
of" hyper-convergence" Using" sparse" Channel Networks. Swedish Nuclear fuel and Waste
471
Management Co. (SKB) SKB R-06-30.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
472 Black, J. H., Barker, J. A. and Woodman, N. D. 2007. An investigation of ‘sparse channel 473
networks'. Characteristic behaviours and their causes. No. SKB-R--07-35. Swedish Nuclear
474
Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB).
RI PT
475 Black, J. H., Woodman, N. D. and Barker, J. A., 2016. Groundwater Flow into Underground 476
Openings in Fractured Crystalline Rocks: An Interpretation Based on Long Channels.
477
Hydrogeology Journal, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10040-016-1511-y.
SC
478 Cacas, M.C., Ledoux, E., de Marsily, G., Tillie, B., Barbreau, A., Durand, E., Feuga, B.,
Peaudecerf, P., 1990. Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network:
480
calibration and validation: 1. The flow model. Water Resources Research 26, 479–489.
481
doi:10.1029/WR026i003p00479
M AN U
479
482 Carrera, J., Sánchez-Vila, X., Benet, I., Medina, A., Galarza, G., Guimerà, J., 1998. On matrix
diffusion: formulations, solution methods and qualitative effects. Hydrogeology Journal 6,
484
178–190. doi:10.1007/s100400050143
TE D
483
485 Croucher, A. “PyTOUGH: a Python scripting library for automating TOUGH2 simulations." In
Proceedings of New Zealand Geothermal Workshop 2011, 21 - 23 November 2011 Auckland,
487
New Zealand. 2011.
EP
486
488 Dagan, G., 2017. Solute plumes mean velocity in aquifer transport: Impact of injection and
detection modes. Advances in Water Resources, Tribute to Professor Garrison Sposito: An
490
Exceptional Hydrologist and Geochemist 106, 6–10.
491
doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.09.014Dalcin, L.D., Paz, R.R., Kler, P.A. and Cosimo, A., 2011.
492
Parallel distributed computing using python. Advances in Water Resources 34(9), pp.1124-
493
1139.
AC C
489
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
494 De Hoog, F. R., Knight, J. H. and Stokes, A. N., 1982. An Improved Method for Numerical 495
Inversion of Laplace Transforms. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 3, no. 3 (1982): 357–
496
66.
RI PT
497 Dershowitz, W.S., Fidelibus, C., 1999. Derivation of equivalent pipe network analogues for three498
dimensional discrete fracture networks by the boundary element method. Water Resources
499
Research 35, 2685–2691. doi:10.1029/1999WR900118
SC
500 Dershowitz, B., Eiben, T., Follin, S., Andersson, J., 1999. SR 97 - Alternative models project.
Discrete fracture network modelling for performance assessment of Aberg (No. SKB-R--99-
502
43). Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.
M AN U
501
503 Dreuzy, J.-R., Méheust, Y. and Pichot, G., 2012. Influence of Fracture Scale Heterogeneity on the 504
Flow Properties of Three dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks (DFN). Journal of
505
Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117, no. B11. doi:10.1029/2012JB009461.
TE D
506 Dreuzy, J.-R., Pichot, G., Poirriez, B., Erhel, J., 2013. Synthetic benchmark for modeling flow in 507
3D fractured media. Computers & Geosciences, Benchmark problems, datasets and
508
methodologies for the computational geosciences 50, 59–71. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.025
EP
509 Dverstorp, B., Andersson, J., and Nordqvist, W., 1992. Discrete Fracture Network Interpretation of
Field Tracer Migration in Sparsely Fractured Rock. Water Resources Research 28, no. 9:
511
2327–43. doi:10.1029/92WR01182.
AC C
510
512 Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press. 513 Figueiredo, B., Tsang, C.-F., Niemi, A. and Lindgren, G., 2016. Review: The state-of-art of sparse 514
channel models and their applicability to performance assessment of radioactive waste
515
repositories in fractured crystalline formations. Hydrogeology Journal 24, no. 7: 1607-1622.
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
516 Frampton, A., Cvetkovic, V., 2009. Significance of injection modes and heterogeneity on spatial
and temporal dispersion of advecting particles in two-dimensional discrete fracture networks.
518
Advances in Water Resources, Dispersion in Porous Media 32, 649–658.
519
doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.010
RI PT
517
520 Gylling, B., Birgersson, L., Moreno, L., and Neretnieks, I., 1998. “Analysis of a Long-Term
Pumping and Tracer Test Using the Channel Network Model.” Journal of Contaminant
522
Hydrology 32, no. 3–4: 203–22. doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00082-X.
SC
521
523 Gylling, B., Neretnieks, I. and Moreno, L., 1999. The Channel Network Model—A Tool for
Transport Simulations in Fractured Media - Gylling – Groundwater 37 no 3: 367-375.
M AN U
524
525 Harter, T., 2005. Finite-size scaling analysis of percolation in three-dimensional correlated binary 526
Markov chain random fields. Physical Review E 72, no. 2: 026120.
527 Hyman, J. D., Karra, S., Makedonska, N., Gable, C. W., Painter, S. L. and Viswanathan, H. S.,
2015. dfnWorks: A Discrete Fracture Network Framework for Modeling Subsurface Flow and
529
Transport. Computers & Geosciences 84: 10–19. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.001.
TE D
528
530 Ishibashi, T., Watanabe, N., Hirano, N., Okamoto, A., Tsuchiya, N., 2015. Beyond laboratory
scale prediction for channeling flows through subsurface rock fractures with heterogeneous
532
aperture distributions revealed by laboratory evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research:
533
Solid Earth 120, 106–124. doi:10.1002/2014JB011555
AC C
EP
531
534 Kang, P.K., Brown, S., Juanes, R., 2016. Emergence of anomalous transport in stressed rough 535
fractures. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 454, 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.033
536 Kang, P.K., Dentz, M., Borgne, T.L., Juanes, R., 2015. Anomalous transport on regular fracture 537
networks: Impact of conductivity heterogeneity and mixing at fracture intersections. Physical
538
Review E 92, 022148. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.92.022148
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
539 Kang, P.K., Dentz, M., Le Borgne, T., Lee, S., Juanes, R., 2017. Anomalous transport in
disordered fracture networks: Spatial Markov model for dispersion with variable injection
541
modes. Advances in Water Resources, Tribute to Professor Garrison Sposito: An Exceptional
542
Hydrologist and Geochemist 106, 80–94. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.03.024
RI PT
540
543 Karypis, G., and Kumar, V., 1998. A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning
Irregular Graphs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 20 no 1: 359-392.
545
doi:10.1137/S1064827595287997.
SC
544
546 Larsson, M., Niemi, A. and Tsang, C.-F., 2012. A Study of Flow-Wetted Surface Area in a Single
Fracture as a Function of Its Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution. Water Resources Research
548
48, no. 1: W01508. doi:10.1029/2011WR010686.
M AN U
547
549 Li, S. C., Xu, Z. H., and Ma, G. W., 2014. A Graph-Theoretic Pipe Network Method for Water
Flow Simulation in Discrete Fracture Networks: GPNM. Tunnelling and Underground Space
551
Technology 42: 247–263. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2014.03.012.
TE D
550
552 Lorenz, C. D., and Ziff, R. M., 1998. Precise determination of the bond percolation thresholds and 553
finite-size scaling corrections for the sc, fcc, and bcc lattices. Physical Review E 57, no. 1: 230.
EP
554 Mahmoudzadeh, B., Liu, L. Moreno, L. and Neretnieks, I., 2013. Solute transport in fractured
rocks with stagnant water zone and rock matrix composed of different geological layers—
556
Model development and simulations. Water Resources Research 49, no. 3: 1709-1727.
AC C
555
557 Mahmoudzadeh, B., Liu, L. Moreno, L. and Neretnieks, I., 2014. Solute transport in a single 558
fracture involving an arbitrary length decay chain with rock matrix comprising different
559
geological layers. Journal of contaminant hydrology 164: 59-71.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
560 Mahmoudzadeh, B., Liu, L. Moreno, L. and Neretnieks I., 2016. Solute transport through fractured 561
rock: Radial diffusion into the rock matrix with several geological layers for an arbitrary length
562
decay chain. Journal of Hydrology 536: 133-146.
RI PT
563 Margolin, G., Berkowitz, B., and Scher, H., 1998. Structure, Flow, and Generalized Conductivity 564
Scaling in Fracture Networks. Water Resources Research 34, no. 9: 2103–21.
565
doi:10.1029/98WR01648.
SC
566 Moreno, L., and Crawford, J., 2009. Can We Use Tracer Tests to Obtain Data for Performance
Assessment of Repositories for Nuclear Waste? Hydrogeology Journal 17, no. 5: 1067–80.
568
doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0418-7.
M AN U
567
569 Moreno, L., and Neretnieks, I., 1993. Fluid Flow and Solute Transport in a Network of Channels. 570
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 14 no. 3-4: 163-192.
571 Neretnieks, I., Eriksen, T. and Tähtinen, P., 1982. Tracer Movement in a Single Fissure in Granitic
Rock: Some Experimental Results and Their Interpretation. Water Resources Research 18, no.
573
4: 849–58. doi:10.1029/WR018i004p00849.
TE D
572
574 Neretnieks, I., 1987. Channeling effects in flow and transport in fractured rocks—Some recent
observations and models, In proceedings of GEOVAL-87 International Symposium, Swed.
576
Nucl. Power Insp. (SKI), Stockholm, April 7-9, 1987.
EP
575
AC C
577 Nowamooz, A., Radilla, G., Fourar, M., Berkowitz, B., 2013. Non-Fickian Transport in 578
Transparent Replicas of Rough-Walled Rock Fractures. Transport in Porous Media 98, 651–
579
682. doi:10.1007/s11242-013-0165-7
580 Park, Y.-J., de Dreuzy, J.-R., Lee, K.-K., Berkowitz, B., 2001. Transport and intersection mixing 581
in random fracture networks with power law length distributions. Water Resources Research
582
37, 2493–2501. doi:10.1029/2000WR000131
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
583 Pusch, R., 2009. Geological Storage of Highly Radioactive Waste. Springer. 584 Selroos, J.-O., Walker, D. D., Ström, A., Gylling, B. and Follin, S., 2002. Comparison of
Alternative Modelling Approaches for Groundwater Flow in Fractured Rock. Journal of
586
Hydrology 257, no. 1–4:174–88. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00551-0.
RI PT
585
587 Shahkarami, P., Liu, L. Moreno, L. and Neretnieks, I., 2015. Radionuclide Migration through
Fractured Rock for Arbitrary-Length Decay Chain: Analytical Solution and Global Sensitivity
589
Analysis. Journal of Hydrology 520: 448–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.060.
SC
588
590 Shahkarami, P., Liu L., Neretnieks, I. and Moreno, L., 2016. The Effect of Stagnant Water Zones
on Retarding Radionuclide Transport in Fractured Rocks: An Extension to the Channel
592
Network Model. Journal of Hydrology 540: 1122-1135.
M AN U
591
593 Tsang, Y. W., and Tsang, C. F., 1989. Flow Channeling in a Single Fracture as a Two
dimensional Strongly Heterogeneous Permeable Medium. Water Resources Research 25, no. 9:
595
2076–80. doi:10.1029/WR025i009p02076.
TE D
594
596 Tsang, C.-F., and Neretnieks, I., 1998. Flow Channeling in Heterogeneous Fractured Rocks. 597
Reviews of Geophysics 36, no. 2: 275–98. doi:10.1029/97RG03319.
EP
598 Tsang, C.-F., Neretnieks, I. and Tsang, Y., 2015. Hydrologic Issues Associated with Nuclear
Waste Repositories. Water Resources Research 51, no. 9: 6923–6972.
600
doi:10.1002/2015WR017641.
AC C
599
601 Tsang, Y. W., Tsang, C. F., Hale, F. V., and Dverstorp, B., 1996. Tracer Transport in a Stochastic 602
Continuum Model of Fractured Media. Water Resources Research 32, no. 10: 3077–92.
603
doi:10.1029/96WR01397.
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
604 Xu, C., Fidelibus, C. and Dowd, P.A., 2014. Realistic pipe models for flow modelling in discrete 605
fracture networks. In Proceedings of the First International Discrete Fracture Network
606
Engineering Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Supplementary material
TE D
M AN U
SC
Visualization of individual particle transport through a channel network (example 3 – section 4.)
EP
-
AC C
608 609
RI PT
607
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights: New scripting library to model flow and transport in unstructured channel networks.
-
An algebraic multigrid preconditioner speeds up the flow solution significantly.
-
All results can be exported for quick 3D visualization in Paraview.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
-