Annals of Discrete Mathematics 27 (1985) 209-214 0 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)
209
A NOTE ON ISOMORPHIC GENERALIZED PRISMS Mohanty and D a l j i t Rao
S.P.
Department of Mathematics I . I . T . Kanpur-208016 U.P., I N D I A INTRODUCTION AND P R E L I M I N A R I E S
Throughout
I n a d d i t i o n , we w i l l c o n s i d e r o n l y t h o s e g r a p h s which a r e
m u l t i p l e edges. connected.
w i l l d e n o t e a f i n i t e u n d i r e c t e d graph w i t h o u t l o o p s o r
G
Most graph t h e o r e t i c terms can be found i n Behzad and Chartrand [ 2 ]
o r F. Harary [ 5 ] .
The c e n t r a l c o n c e p t s and n o t a t i o n s of t h i s paper a r e now
defined. If graph
i s a p e r m u t a t i o n of t h e s e t of v e r t i c e s
TI
of
,
i s o b t a i n e d by t a k i n g two d i s j o i n t c o p i e s ,
(G,n)
l a b e l l e d graph n(v$
V(G)
G ,
then the permutation and
G1
t o g e t h e r w i t h edges j o i n i n g t h e v e r t e x
v.
The concept of p e r m u t a t i o n graph of a graph
G2.
G2,
of G
G1
of t h e to
was i n t r o d u c e d
i n 1967 by Chartrand and Harary i n 1 4 1 . I n t h e d e f i n i t i o n of p e r m u t a t i o n graph we w i l l use t h e f o l l o w i n g n o t a t i o n
i n case in
(C,,IT)
and
1 , 2 , ...,n
The l a b e l l i n g
G = (C,,T).
l a b e l l i n g of
along the cycle
V(C )
w i l l be denoted by
Ca
and
of
G
w i l l be c o n s e c u t i v e
The two c o p i e s
Cn. Cb
G1
and
G2
r e s p e c t i v e l y so t h a t
ala2.*.anal b a r e c o n s e c u t i v e l a b e l l i n g s a l o n g t h e c y c l e s Ca and 'b * n l and Cb w i l l be c a l l e d t h e a-cycle and b-cycle of G r e s p e c t i v e l y .
Ca
Klee [ 8 ] c a l l s
(C
a g e n e r a l i z e d n-prism.
,T)
By r(G) we d e n o t e t h e automorphism group of G a c t i n g on V ( G ) = { 1 , 2 , I t i s w e l l known t h a t T(C ) i s D
n'
m e t r i c group on n symbols a s u s u a l . f
'n
blb 2...b
Also
n2
of
Sn a s
IT
t h e d i h e d r a l group.
Let S
...,n}.
d e n o t e t h e sym-
We t a k e composition of two p e r m u t a t i o n s IT
n ( i ) = IT (T (i)). 1 2 1 2
1'
I n [ 6 ] Hedetniemi proved t h a t ( G , T r ' ) i s isomorphic t o (G,n) f o r a l l IT' i n 1 Holton and S t a c e y [ 71 T ( G ) I T T ( G ) U r(G)n- r(G) and p o s s i b l y f o r o t h e r n' too. proved t h e converse of t h i s r e s u l t f o r Roman Numerals, t h a t i s , t h e g r a p h s (Pn,T),
TI
f
A , where A i s d e f i n e d a s A
A II { i + l : i F A } I t B
=
{ ,2,.
..
=
h:
n
=
n
i EA
( i i+l)
fl
j EB
( j ) } where
, n ) = V(Pn) and t h e t h r e e s u b s e t s of V(P ) a r e
mutually d i s j o i n t . Here w e s h a l l prove t h e converse of H e d e t n i e m i ' s r e s u l t s f o r g e n e r a l i z e d n-prisms
(C,,I),
where
IT
C
A.
F i r s t w e develop a method which d e t e r m i n e s whether
S.P. Mohanty and D.Rao
210
a given permutation Let Define D(a) di
=
=
for i
=
1,2
1
2
r(1)
F(2)
(
TI =
(d ,d ,d3,...,dn)
-
TI(i+l)
=
belongs to
TI'
...
r (Cn)71-%
(C ) U
n(n)
I*
if T(i+l) > r ( i ) or
TI(i)
< ~(i)
if r(if1)
,...,n with i+l taken to be 1 when i
We note that D(n1)
=
D(n2)
= n.
if and only if
T2 =
(i) = n (i) + k for i 5 i 5 n where k E {0,1,2 2 1 is reduced modulo n . A l s o D ( n ) has the property
TI
j' C di & O(mod n) i=j and
and
nl(i)
+k
nT(Cn)
if
.
O(mod n)
s
i=l
nl + k , i.e.,
,...,n-11
1 5 j < j ' 5 n-1
if
n
Z d.
(Cn).
of IT as follows:
- v(i) + n
n(i+l)
r (Cn)TIr
Now we have the following:
,...,dn .
THEOREM 1. Let D(T')
D(n) = (dl,d2,d3
Then
n'
E r(Cn)
is one o f t h e following: (i)
(ii)
(iii) (iv)
,...,d ) , (dk,dk+l ,...,dn,dl,...,dk-l) (dl,d2
for
k
E
{2,3
,...,n},
..
(dn,dn-l,. ,dl) ,
,...,n-d ) .
(n-dl,n-d2
Proof.
(i)
If D ( n ' ) =
71'
where
(ii)
e
=
D(n)
1 n + k = (k+l
where
k
71"
= (n(k)
.
.
+
...
...
Sn.
... ...
2 n(k+l)
{2,3,. . , n 1
E
= TI
2 k+2
is the identity of 1
Take
then n '
...,n-1). n-k+l n-k+2 ... n 1 2 ... k ) TI e TI'E r(cn) r(cn) . n-k+2 ... " )
k where n-k n
so
k
E
{0,1,2,
71
n-k+l ~ ( n ) n(1)
...
~(k-1)
Then
D(n") = (dk,dk+l, ...,dn,dl,d2,...,dk-l) = D(n')
and
TI"
=
1
en (k
2 k+l
.. . ...
n-k+l n
n-k+2 1
... ...
) E
k-1
r(cn)
71
r(cn)
Now
Isomorphic Generalized Prisms where
and
n"(i)
=
n-II(n-i+2)
D(n")
=
(dn,dn-l
Then
,...,d 1) ...
2
1 (n-1
=
TI"
.
i
...
n-2
n-i
D(n')
=
...
Take
D(TI")
and
1 (n-n(l)
TI" =
=
... ...
2 n-.ir(2)
... ...
"n )
2
.*.
i
...
n-i
...
i
...
n-n(i) = D(IT')
n-2
i n-if2
...
...
") 2
* * .
r(cn)
(n-dl,n-d2,. . . ,n-d )
1 (n-1
=
II"
r(cn)
...
2 n
n ) *(l n 1
n-1 1
...
E
(iv)
211
n n-n(n) )
e Er(cn)
TI
.
nr(cn)
Then
.
This completes the proof. In the above theorem (ii) and (iii) are called the cyclic and reverse D(n)
cyclic variations of
.
D(n)
of
respectively and (iv) is called the complement
We have E r(cn) 7 r(cn) u r(Cn)n-' r(c ) ni s a c y c l i c o r a reverse c y c l i c v a r i a t i o n of D ( T ) , D(T
COROLLARY 2. D(II')
if and onzy if
')or t h e i r
complements. Let
C
and
C'
be two vertex disjoint induced n-cycles in G
such that each vertex of vertices of
C
and
i
respectively where
.
If the ci, di
is adjacent to exactly one vertex in
1,2,.,.,n,
=
(C,,TI)
are labelled consecutively along the cycles by
C
C'
=
then the permutation
C'
TI' induced by this
labelling is defined in the natural way, as follows: n'(i)
Let
THEOREM 3 .
nf
E
r(cn) Proof.
Let
has order two. (Cn,n')
when
G =
E
where
c.d =
i k
Then
(Cn,n)
(C , n )
where
II E A .
In either case TI'
k
A .
TI E
.
nr(cn)
=
l'(Cn)
TT
-1 T=TI
T(Cn)
so
E(cn,n)
.
(C IT') if and only if n'
Then
and
.
E
n = e , the identify o r
by Hedetniemi's result
It is easy to see that the theorem holds for n = 3 or copies of
(Cn,n')
a : (Cn,n)
* (C
be called
,TI')
Cc
and
Cd
be an isomorphism.
respectively.
a
u
(Cc)
=
Al U B1 , a
-1
(C ) d
Moreover, each vertex of
=
A2 IJ B2
Al U Bl
,TI) =
Let the two
Let
Let
a-1 (Cc) f' C a = A 1 and u -1 (Cc) n C b = B 1 , C - A = A 2 and -1
4 .
(C
TI
1
and < A . U Bi>
=
Cn
C - B = B2 . for
Then
i=1,2.
is adjacent to exactly one vertex of
A2 U B
2'
S.P. Mohanty and D.Rao
212 Let
a. ai+l... ai+k
the cases B1, bl
E
B1.
A2
If
and
aifl
be a maximal segment of
B2 are analogous).
bi+2
to
and
bi+l
1 1
bi+l
k> 1
Let
If
k=l.
But then
ai+lbi+2
,
E(G)
E
a
So
.
1 1
has two neighbors C4.
=
and
bi+2
B1
E
E
a
i+l
and hence
.
B1*
bi+l
ai+l and bi+l Therefore ,
in
Then 4 I J B > = C4 and therefore, 1 1 E(G) s o that bi+l E B l . Then b
in A1 U B1.
bi+l
Then
is impossible.
b L E(G) i+l i+2
a b E E(G) and hence bi+l E B1 i+l i+l n = 4 . Let a.b. f E ( G ) and aibi+l
.
B2 but with
has two neighbors on this
which is in A 2 , has two neighbors
A1 U B 1 , which is impossible.
then
E(G)
E
is in
ai+2, then A1 U B1 must
Now bi+2
5-cycle which is a contradiction. So
(the proofs for
On the other hand, if
is adjacent to
be the 5-cycle ai,ai+l,ai+2,bi+l,bi.
in Al
First let a.b.
is adjacent to bi+l, then
two neighbors in A1 U B1 which is impossible. is adjacent
Ca
b.
So
E
B1
i
and
Hence n=4.
Finally, let
aibi-l
E
E(G)
so that
bi-l
E
B1.
Then
bi
B2
E
for
otherwise a has two neighbors a and bi in A1 U B 1 . If bi-2 E B i-1 i 2' then bi-l has two neighbors in A2 U B2 which is impossible. Therefore bi-2
E
B1
and
a ,b. i-1 1
E
Thus we see that if
A2 U B
2'
n > 4 , then the n-cycles
4. U B . > , 1
1
i=1,2 continue
in the following way:
so
bl,b2...bi-2bi-lai...ai+kbi+k+l"*bn
al,a2...ai-lbi
that relabelling ai,bi in
we obtain
TI
A1 U B1
as
c
i
B1>
and
a b.
i'
1
E
A2 U B
t
r(cn)
nir(cn)
ii' E
r(Cn)
T
r(cn)
and
u
.
A2 U B
r(cn)(nl)-l
= ff
-1
(C,)
r(cn)
.
, this permutation is so
But this result is not true for general
ir"
and hence
= 71
(C,,T)
.
as
di
But since
as the induced permutation from this labelling also.
A1 U Bl = a-'(Cc) ir"
...bi+kai+k+l...an
T"
where
1
For instance,
(CI0,(3,6,4,2,5,7,9,1,8,10)= (ClO,(3,9,7,5,8,6,1,4,2,10)) but (3,6,4,2,5,7,9,1,8,10) k? r(C,,)(3,9,7,5,8,6,1,4,2,10) r(C10)(7,9,1,8,4,6,3,5,2,10)
r(ClO)
.
r(ClO)
or
However, no such example where
71
is a
product of disjoint transpositions could be constructed. We conclude this note with the following. Our interest in generalized n-prisms is due to the following problem mentioned in [ E l . PROBLEM. Which generalized n-prisms admit a HamiZtonian circuit?
213
Isomorphic Generalized Prisms If
D(n)
contains 1 or
n-1
then obviously
the problem is to find those permutations n but
(Cn,?r) is Hamiltonian. (D(n)
for which
either 1 or
n-1
(Cn,IT) is Hamiltonian.
about D(7)
it was possible to enumerate all such D ( n ) ' s
(that is, corresponding
(Cn,n)'s
(2,2,2,2,2)
if
(3,2,2,3,4,4)
does not contain
Using our earlier discussion
are nonisomorphic)
There are none for n = 3 or 4 and for n > 5
So
which are distinct 3 5 n 5 8.
tor
we have the following D(n)'s:
n=5, if
n=6,
(3,3,3,3,3,3,3), (2,2,2,2,4,5,4), (2,4,5,4,4,5,4)
if
n=7
(3,2,2,2,5,6,6,6), (4,3,3,3,4,5,5,5), (2,4,6,3,6,4,2,5), (4,3,6,4,2,3,4,6), (4,2,3,2,2,2,3,6), (4,3,2,5,5,2,5,6), (4,2,4,3,4,6,4,5), (4,5,5,5,2,2,3,6), (4,5,6,6,5,4,5,5),
n=S.
(2,3,2,5,2,3,2,5), (2,3,2,5,5,5,5,5), if It can be seen without difficulty that
(Cn,n)
corresponding to these
D(~r)'s
excepting n = 5 are hamiltonian. This result was also obtained in [ S ] using computer. The permutation IT n
k,n
(i)
=
is given by k,n residue of ik(mod n)
if
1
i 5 n-1
5
and
n
k,n
(n) = n ,
) of k and n are coprime and 1 5 k 5 n / 2 . The subfamily (cn, n k,n generalized n-prisms is isomorphic to the generalized Petersen graphs G(n,k)
where for
(n,k)
=
1.
It was shown by Robertson [9] that the graphs if and only if
n
z
5(mod 6).
G(n,2)
The nonhamiltonian G(n,2)
are non-hamiltonian graphs are now known
as the Robertson graphs. The result that the graphs G(n,3) , (n,3) hamiltonian except for the Petersen graph
(n=5)
=
is due to Bondy [3].
1 are Kozo
Bannai [l] has obtained the following. THEOREM 4. Ccficralized Petersen graphs
G(n,k)
with
(n,k)
=
1 are
hamiltonian unless t h e y a r e isomorphic t o Robertson graphs. As
G(n,k)
has
D(rr
)
k,n a constant sequence, i . e . , if
which we must have k = 2
when
(n,k)
=
=
(k,k,...k)
D(n)
1 , then
we have one more result on
is a constant sequence (Cn,n)
(k,k,...k)
D(n), for
is always hamiltonian excepting
nes(mod6).
The anlysis could not proceed as we could not obtain any general result on D(n)
necessary for o u r purpose. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors are extremely thankful to the referee for his helpful comments.
214
S.P. Mohanty and D.Rao REFERENCES Bannai, Kozo, Hamiltonian cycles in generalized Paterson graph, J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B, 24 (1978), 181-188. Behzad, M. and Chartrand, G., Introduction to the Theory of Graphs, (Allyn and Bacon, Boxton 1971).
131 Bondy, J.A., Variations on the Hamiltonian theme, Can. Math. Bull. 15 (19721, 57-62. [41 Chartrand, G. and Harary, F., Planar permutation graphs, Ann. Inst. Henin Poincare, Vol. 11 No. 4 (19671, 433-438. Harary, F., Graph Theory, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969). Hedetniemi, S . , On Classes of Graphs Defined by Special Cutsets of Lines in the Many Facets of Graph Theory, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 110, 171-190. [71 Holton, D.A. and Stacey, K.C., Some Problems in Permutation Graphs, School of Mathematical Sciences Research Report No. 18, University o f Melbourne, Melbourne, (1974). Klee, V., Which Generalized Prisms Admit H-circuits, Graph Theory and Applications, (Y. Alavi, D.R. Lick and A.T. White, eds.) SpringerVerlag, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 303, 173-179. Robertson, G.N., Graphs under Girth, Valency and Connectivity Constraints, (Dissertation), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1968.