MECHANICS
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
0093-6413/83/010037-08503.00/0
Vol.
10(1),37-44, 1983. Printed in the U S A Copyright (c) 1983 Pergamon Press Ltd
A NOTE ON NONLINEAR ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION
Cohen and Marcelo Epstein Department of Civil Engineering,
H.
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Canada.
(Received 22 July 1982; accepted for print 16 November 1982)
Introduction
Much of the effort and success in dealing with wave propagation in nonlinear materials has centered around the concept of a propagating singular surface of order two - an acceleration wave. Although this technique has led to new insights into nonlinear material behaviour it is, by its very nature, limited, in terms of the information which it can provide. The information as to the dynamical state of the medium is restricted to yield only the nature of the acceleration jump at the wave front. At best, if one is able to solve the propagation condition for the shape of the wave front, then the technique will yield, after solution of the growth-decay equation, the evolution of this jump as it moves with the wave front. Usually, these solutions to the propagation condition consist either of plane waves or waves with a high degree of geometrical as well as dynamical symmetry. For these cases the growth-decay behaviour is governed by an ordinary differential equation. For more general situations, the compatibility relations, which underlie the method, lead to partial differential equations for the growth-decay behaviour. The resolution of this difficulty through transformation to a more suitable set of coordinates in which the desired equations are ordinary creates an analytical impasse as the choice of coordinates in the compatibility relations is fixed. In order to effect a more complete solution to the nonlinear wave propagation problem one needs information as to the dynamical state of affairs behind the wave front. It has been suggested [i], [2], that such information may be elicited via the singular surface technique by finding the jumps in the n-th order derivatives of the deformation, n ~ 2. These jumps could then be used as the coefficients in a series expansion at the wave front which would allow calculation into the region behind the wave front. In fact, such a process has been successfully effected in several recent papers [3], [4], [5], pertaining to the dynamics of plates and shells. As suggested above, one of the major roadblocks in executing such a scheme stems from the basic nature of the compatibility relations. Moreover, these relations when iterated for the higher order jumps are of such complexity as to render their application almost impossible, if in fact they are even available [6]. In this paper we present an extremely concise form of the iterated compatibility relations which are readily useful for finding the basic equations for the higher order waves. Moreover, their formulation involves an 37
38
H. COHEN and MARCELO EPSTEIN
arbitrary equations
choice of coordinates on the singular are derived in the following section.
surface
in space-time.
These
In the next section we apply these relations to the equations of motion of a nonlinear elastic solid and obtain the basic equations which govern deformation waves of all orders, n > 2. These equations are analyzed in the subsequent section, wherein both the growth-decay and induced wave equations are extracted from them. The first of these equations is in general a partial differential equation which is linear for waves of all orders, except n = 2. The latter equations are algebraic in nature and give the induced higher order wave associated with a primary wave of order one lower. In the final section we give an a l g o r i t h m for solving problems in nonlinear elastodynamics which utilizes the wave front expansion mentioned earlier. In particular, the procedure involves t r a n s f o r m i n g to coordinates obtained after solving for the characteristics of the growth-decay equations, which then may be employed to render these into ordinary differential equations. We surmise, that the ultimate success of the overall process will depend upon a suitable marriage of analytical with computer oriented numerical methods.
The Iterated
Let
S
Compatibility
Relations
be a moving surface
in space, which
represented
by ~(X I) - t = 0, where
system and
t
presents
denotes
the time.
transformation
In a space-time
which allows S to be represented Let ~ = ~(XI,t) formation
be a tensor
equation
Evaluation comprise equations
(i) results
a system of surface
to be
coordinate
m a n i f o l d this equation
Following
[7],
re-
[8], we introduce
defined by _ T ,
by th e equation
(i)
T = 0
of place and time.
Introducing
the trans-
in , ¢(yi)
of ~ at % = 0 yields
(2) results
, t = ~(yI)
function
: ~(yi
S.
in space-time
X I = yI
we assume
(XI), I = 1,2,3 are a spatial
the fixed surface S swept out by
the coordinate
for simplicity,
_ ~)
: ~(yi
, ~)
(2)
the value of ~ on S as a function of yI, which
coordinates
on S.
A simple
calculation
using
in •
2
~'i : ~'i + ~ ¢'i ' ~ : -
~
'
(3)
where
3X I
Let S be singular in ~ across S.
'
for ~, i.e.
~t
'
3yI
,
(4)
~T
[~] = [~] # 0 on S, where
Since these jumps are defined on S only,
[~] denotes
the jump
it follows that
[~]
N O N L I N E A R ELASTIC WAVE P R O P A G A T I O N
is a function of the surface hei~la, [6] - s e c t i o n
174,
arbitrary
on S.
direction
the surface equivalent arrive
coordinate to
coordinates
yl only.
We have by Hadamard's
that d[@]/ds = [@,l]dyI/ds, By choosing
ds
39
where
ds represents
along the directions
system on S, we see that the foregoing
[~],I = [~'I]"
By an iterated
application
an
defined by
equation
is
of this equation we
at the relations k
k A
,
] =
[~]
[~ ii...in_ k where
for present and later convenience k ^ ^ k k notations ~ = ~k~/~T and ~ =
~k~/~tk.
introduced
in [6] - section
174,
,
we have
one might
appropriately
compatibility
In order to obtain a convenient
and concise
fundamental
we utilize
relations
introduced
the shorthand
In conformity with the terminology
(5) as the iterated superficial
lity relations,
(5)
'I 1 ..-In_ k
refer to equations
relations.
form of the so-called
the t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
equations
compatibi-
(3) as well as the
(5), to obtain m
m
m+ 1
m
m
[~,i] = (-l)m{[~],i + [ ~ ]~,i } , [~,ij] = (-l)m{[~],ij m+
1
111+ 1
m+ 2
In+ 1
+ [ ~ ],i ~'a + [ ~ ]'J ~'I + [ ~ ]~'I ~'a + [ ~ ]~'la } Of course,
these equations
the compatibility the primary
relations
partial
second order,
these will
tions,
derivatives
attention
tangent
replacement worthwhile
geometric
which are in general
transversal
coordinates
remarking
dent of the metrical
to
that the d e r i v a t i o n properties
of space.
of motion
S
from
rela-
make use of a decomposition
to S, as well as a special Here, we used
only to S along the arbitrary yI.
as
- are of
compatibility
time derivative.
to S, in the direction
for the derivative n o r m a l
However,
for our purpose.
and k i n e m a t i c
and n o r m a l
tangent
derivatives.
to provide
(6) differ in appearance
Those relations
to S - the displacement
tions defined by the surface derivative
that equations
both tangent
iteration
- the equations
turn out to be sufficient
176 and 181.
in terms of derivatives derivative
equations
form of the iterated
[6] - sections
via further
for h i g h e r order spatial
differential
We call to the readers' the standard
may be generalized
(6)
direc-
In addition we have used a parallel
to the time axis,
in the usual procedure.
of equations
(6) is totally
as a
It is indepen-
40
H. COHEN and MARCELO EPSTEIN
Application
to Acceleration Waves
The equations
of motion of a homogeneous
nonlinear
elastic solid are
AKkQq xq,KQ + Po fk = p o ~k where
(XK) and (Xk) are rectangular Cartesian
ence configuration
and in space,
(7)
'
coordinate
respectively,
systems in the refer-
Po is the reference density,
fk is the body force per unit mass and the functions AKkQq = AKkQq(Xp,p) the elasticities
of the material.
The assumption
made for a desire to avoid notational limitation.
of material homogeneity
are is
awkwardness and not for any theoretical
For the same reason we shall assume the material to be undeformed
and initially at rest. The latter assumption will allow us to make subsequent
use of the simple
identity n ( l)n+ I [a~1 = ~a ] = _ where ~a, a = i, ..., n, are
n
but which vanish ahead of S.
In equation
n a =~l
quantities
[~a ]
(8)
,
discontinuous
at the wave front,
(8) ~ denotes the continuous product
symbol. Under the simplifying
assumptions made above the n-th material
of the equations of motion
n
m(n
I m=l P=I
(7) can be written as
n m m
Cmp
time derivative
ml
. . x. . . xq,KQ AKkQqlli I . . Ipip Ii 'If
+ ~kQq
n n+2 Xq,KQ = 0o Xk
x. Ip ip~
'
(9)
with m I >
m 2 >_
...
>_ m p
>_ 1
, m I +
m 2
+
...
+
mp
=
m
(i0)
,
~PAKkQq AKkQqIlil'''Ipip
In writing equations
(9) - (ii) we have generalized to several variables
formula of Fa~ di Bruno efficients
C
mp
.
(11) ~xi l,II'''~xip,Ip
the
[9], which provides a recipe for calculating the co-
The important
fact for our purpose is that C
ml
= I for all m.
For an acceleration wave we have by definition [xi] = [xi ] = 0 , [xi ] # 0
(12)
NONLINEAR ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION
Rewriting equations
41
(6) for the motion x i = xi(Xl,t) results in
n+ 1 n n n I] = (-l)n{[xi],l n + [ xi ]~'I } • [ x i , i J ] = (-I) [xi, n+l
n+l
n+l
n
{[~i],ij
n+2
(13)
+ [ xi ]'I *'J + [ xi ]'J 9'I + [ xi ]~'IJ + [ xi ]~'I ~•J} " By virtue of equations
(12) we get, in particular
•
A
[xi, I] = -
A
(14)
[xi]~, I , [xi,iJ] = [xi]~, I $,j
We now take the jump of equation (9) noting that by virtue of the above equations the highest order jump appearing therein will be n + 2.
Lumping to-
gether all of the terms not containing jumps of order higher than
n
under the
n
notation Rk, and using equations
(3)2, (8), (13), (14), and Cml = i, we obtain
for the jump of equation (9) n+2 A
(AQq
A
~'K @'Q - 0o ~kq )[ Xq ] + (AKkQqli ~'K ~'Q @'I[Xi ] n+l
n+l
n
+ AKkQq ,,KQ )[ Xq ] + (AKkQq + ~ k K q l , , K ~xq ],Q + Rk = 0
(15)
Note the essential feature of the equation, namely• that the coefficient of the highest order jump is exactly the one used in the propagation condition. Indeed, for n = 0, equation (15) reduces to the propagation condition.
In
general, we refer to equation (15) as the decay-induction equation since for any n k 1 it determines the growth-decay characteristics
of all primary waves
of order n + i• as well as the secondary or induced waves of order n + 2. Note n+l also that, except for n = i, the equation is linear in [ Xq ].
Analysis of Decay and Induction
As remarked above, for n = 0 in equation (15) we recover the propagation condition for acceleration waves, namely X (Qkp -Qo ~kp)[Xp ] = 0
where the acoustic tensor Qkp is defined by Qkp = AKkPp ¢'K @'P" trivial solutions of equation
(16)
(16)
, The non
can be obtained by first solving the
characteristic equation det ._(0kp- 0o ~k_)i ~ = 0
(17)
42
H. COHEN and MARCELO EPSTEIN
which is a highly non linear first order partial differential equaiton in ~. To each simple solution ~(~), ~ = i, 2, 3, of equation initial conditions,
(17), subject to given
there will correspond a wave surface S (~) whose speed of
propagation U (~) is given by U (~) = {~!~)- #!~)}-½.-
By a simple solution of
equation (17) we mean that the determinantal equation factors into three distinct terms, each of which gives rise to a unique partial differential equation for ~.
Corresponding to each ~(~) there will be an eigenvector field
](~)
of acceleration jumps
[xi
constant by equation
(16).
determined up to an arbitrary multiplicative
Choosing one of the ~(~) we write [~q](~) = no
sum on
a (~)
eq(~) ,
(18)
for the associated acceleration jump.
a (~) are a normalized solution of equation tude, respectively.
In equation
(18) e~ ~) and
(16) and its indeterminate magni-
We assume conditions are such that on the initial surface
So at t = 0, the acceleration jump is in fact a solution of equation ~(~)-, so as to avoid giving rise to the other wave types.
(16) for
Moreover, we assume
also that the initial conditions are such as to be compatible with whatever higher order induced waves are required by equation (15). We shall now extract the decay and induced wave equations from equation (15) (~) for the solution ~ From this point on, we shall drop the superscript for notational convenience. more use equations
If we multiply equation
(15) by ek, and further-
(16) and (18), we obtain the first order partial differen-
tial equations n+l n+l ^ n n n BQq[ Xq ],Q + Cq[ Xq] + D = 0 ,BQq = BkQ q ek , Cq = Ckq e k , m = K k ek ,
(19) BkQq : (AKkQq +AQkKq)*'K ' Ckq = AKkQq *'KQ + AKkQqli *'K *'Q *'I a e i
Equations
(19) I will be used to determine for all order waves the growth-decay
behaviour parallel to the primary wave
[~].
To extract the induced waves from equations
(15) we note that the operator
(Qkq - Po 6kq)' when restricted to the two-dimensional subspace ek orthogonal to ek, is non-singular and hence invertible.
Let Pkq denote the composition
of this inverse preceded by projection onto e k. results in
Applying Pkq to equation (15)
NONLINEAR ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION
43
n+2]~ Pkt{Ckq[n+l n21 n [ xt = Xq ] + BkQq[ Xq ],Q + ~ } which is an algebraic equation for the determination
,
(20)
of the induced higher
order waves for all n k 0. We note that the induced wave determines only the n+2 n+2 part [ xt ]~ of [ xt ] which is orthogonal to e k.
A Solution Algorithm
We now present an algorithm for utilizing the preceding analysis in solving problems in nonlinear wave propagation. (i)
The procedure envisaged is as follows:
Solve the partial differential
which defines the wave front S.
equation
(17) for a simple solution ¢
Use this solution in equation
((16) to find
the corresponding eigenvector ek as a function of YI" (ii)
For n = 1 in equation
(19) 1 use equation
(18) to obtain the first
decay equation as BQq eq a,Q + (BQq e q , Q + C q This is a first order nonlinear ential equation
and they coincide (7).
(by virtue of equation
for the amplitude
istics of equation
a
d Y2
d Y3
B lq e q
B 2q e q
B ~q e q
[8] with the bicharacteristics
of the equations of motion
(18), provides
Still with n = i, use equation
and substitute into equation
on S.
subspace of e k.
] = [~] (19)1
+ a ek
(23)
for n = 2 to obtain a linear partial diffare still given by equations
Use these to construct and solve the corresponding ordinary differential I
equation for a, which when combined with equations S.
The sol-
(20) to calculate the projection
erential equation for ~, whose characteristics
on
[~]
(21) into
Write [
(22).
(22)
,
for 'a' along these characteristics.
of [~k] on the complementary (iv)
The character-
and use these to transform equation
ution of this equation, with equation
[Xk ]
(19)6) partial differ-
of the acceleration wave.
d YI
ordinary differential equations
(iii)
(21)
(21) are given by
Find the characteristics
"4"
eq)a = 0 .
(18) and (23) yields
"'°
[%]
44
H. COHEN and MARCELO EPSTEIN
(v)
Increase
n
by one and repeat steps (iii) and (iv) recursively to
obtain the jumps for increasingly higher (iv)
n.
To obtain the solution into the region behind the wave front we
formally compute the Taylor's expansion N n ~ (-i) n [xi] Tn/n! , (24) n=2 n where T ~ 0, and the coefficients [xi] have been found by the preceding proA
A
xi(Yi,T ) =
cess and
N
is sufficiently large to ensure satisfactory convergence.
References
i.
F.G. Friedlander,
"Sound Pulses", Cambridge University Press, 1958.
2.
J.D. Achenbach, "Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids", North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.
3.
H. Cohen, A.H. Shah, and D.P. Thambiratnam, "Transient and Time Harmonic Waves in Elastic Plates", Int. J. Solids Structures, 15, pp. 395-404,1979.
4.
D.P. Thambiratnam, A.H. Shah, and H. Cohen, "Axisymmetric Transients in Shells of Revolution", Earthqu. Engng. & Struct. Mech., 7, pp. 369-382, 1979.
5.
D.P. Thambiratnam, A.H. Shah, and H. Cohen, "Transients in Cylindrical Shells", Earthqu. Engng. & Struct. Mech., 8, pp. 17-30, 1980.
6.
C. Truesdell and R. Toupin, "The Classical Field Theories", Encyclopedia of Physics, Edited by S. FiHgge, Vol. III/l, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1960.
7.
E. Varley and E. Cumberbatch, "Nonlinear Theory of Wave Front Propagation", J. Inst. Maths. Applics., i, pp. 101-112, 1965.
8.
H. Cohen and M. Epstein, "Wave Fronts in Elastic Membranes", to appear in J. Elasticity, 1982.
9.
S. Roman, "The Formula of Faa di Bruno", American Math. Monthly, 87, pp. 805-809, 1980.
Acknowledgement
H. Cohen wishes to acknowledge and thank The University of Calgary and the Killam Foundation for naming him a Killam Visiting Scholar, during which time this paper was written. Both authors wish to acknowledge the support in part through their respective operating grants from the National Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada.