Journal Pre-proof A potential tradeoff between feeding rate and aversive learning determines intoxication in a Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen system Pallavi Velagapudi, Rachel Ghoubrial, Ratnavi Shah, Helana Ghali, Meghan Haas, Krunal S. Patel, Ashleigh Riddell, Christopher A. Blanar, Robert P. Smith PII:
S1286-4579(20)30024-1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.002
Reference:
MICINF 4684
To appear in:
Microbes and Infection
Received Date: 3 June 2019 Revised Date:
15 January 2020
Accepted Date: 16 January 2020
Please cite this article as: P. Velagapudi, R. Ghoubrial, R. Shah, H. Ghali, M. Haas, K.S. Patel, A. Riddell, C.A. Blanar, R.P. Smith, A potential tradeoff between feeding rate and aversive learning determines intoxication in a Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen system, Microbes and Infection, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.002. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Institut Pasteur.
1 1
A potential tradeoff between feeding rate and aversive learning determines intoxication in a
2
Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen system.
3 4 5
Pallavi Velagapudi*, Rachel Ghoubrial*, Ratnavi Shah, Helana Ghali, Meghan Haas, Krunal S. Patel,
6
Ashleigh Riddell, Christopher A. Blanar and Robert P. Smith
7 8 9 10
Department of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale FL, 33314
11 12
Correspondence should be addressed to Robert P Smith. E-mail:
[email protected] Tel: 954 262
13
7979
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
*
these authors contributed equally
2 25
Abstract
26
Despite being the first line of defense against infection, little is known about how host-
27
pathogen interactions determine avoidance. Caenorhabditis elegans can become infected by
28
chemoattractant-producing bacteria through ingestion. The worms can learn to associate these
29
chemoattractants with harm through aversive learning. As a result, the worms will avoid the
30
pathogen. Evolutionary constraints have likely shaped the attraction, intoxication and learning
31
dynamics between bacteria and C. elegans, but these have not been explored. Using bacteria
32
engineered to express an acylhomoserine lactone chemoattractant and a nematicidal protein, we
33
explored how manipulating the amount of attractant produced by the bacteria affects learning and
34
intoxication in mixed stage populations of C. elegans. We found that increasing the production rate of
35
the chemoattractant increased the feeding rate in C. elegans, but decreased the time required for C.
36
elegans to learn to avoid the chemoattractant. Learning generally coincided with a decreased feeding
37
rate. We also observed that the percentage of intoxicated worms was maximized at intermediate
38
production rates of the attractant. We propose that interactions between attractant driven feeding
39
rate and aversive learning are likely responsible for this trend. Our results increase our understanding
40
of behavioral avoidance in C. elegans and have implications in understanding host-pathogen dynamics
41
that shape avoidance.
42 43
Keywords: evolutionary tradeoff; acylhomoserine lactone; avoidance; crystal toxin protein; feeding
44
rate; learning deficient;
45 46 47 48
3 49
1. Introduction
50
The interactions between a host and a pathogen have been described as an evolutionary
51
arms race [1]. The pathogen develops strategies to infect the host. The host counteracts by
52
developing its own strategies to prevent and defend against infection. The strategies that the host
53
can develop to defend against infection are diverse but can be grouped into avoidance [2], tolerance
54
[3] and resistance [4]. Avoidance has been observed in diverse organisms and can involve strategies
55
to avoid infected conspecifics [5], vectors [6] and environmental conditions [7] that promote disease
56
transmission, and strategies to modify habitat to decrease the chance of infection [8]. While the
57
immunological and biochemical interactions that govern infection processes have been explored,
58
less attention has been paid to studying behaviors that are used for avoidance [2]. Understanding
59
avoidance within the context of host-pathogen interactions is important, as such strategies serve as
60
the first line of defense against infection [9] and are more cost-effective relative to mounting an
61
immunological response [2].
62
Some pathogens emit (e.g., [10]), or alter their host to emit (e.g., [11]), chemoattractants that
63
serve to promote infection and/or transmission. Pathogens that emit chemoattractants infect a wide
64
range of hosts including nematodes [12], insects [10], plants [13], and humans [14]. Towards
65
avoiding these pathogens, potential hosts have developed avoidance strategies that can rely on the
66
ability to detect and avoid the chemoattractant, which serves to reduce infection (e.g., [5]). These
67
interactions are observed in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which has served as a model system
68
for host-pathogen interactions [15, 16]. C. elegans can become infected by several species of bacteria,
69
fungi, and viruses [15, 17]. One mechanism that bacteria use to gain entry into C. elegans is through
70
ingestion [15]. The primary food source for C. elegans in both natural [18] and laboratory settings [19]
71
is bacteria. The worms use gradients of bacteria-produced chemicals, including amino acids [20], and
72
autoinducers involved in quorum sensing [21], to locate food sources. Some bacterial pathogens of
4 73
C. elegans produce chemicals that initially attract the worms [12, 22, 23]. However, upon
74
consumption of these pathogens, C. elegans can learn to associate the attractive chemical with harm
75
and will alter its behavior by reducing its feeding rate [24], entering into the dauer stage [25],
76
becoming repulsed by the chemical [26] and/or leaving areas where the pathogenic bacteria are
77
growing [22]. Ultimately, these strategies allow C. elegans to avoid the pathogen.
78
For naïve worms, avoiding pathogens through learning appears not to be instantaneous. C.
79
elegans must consume the pathogen over several hours to drive aversive learning [26]. The time
80
required to drive aversive learning appears to vary among pathogens [17, 26]. Similarly, death of C.
81
elegans due to infection also varies among pathogens [12, 23]. This variability may be accounted for
82
by differences in the structure and diffusion rates of the odor and/or mechanisms of action during
83
pathogenesis. It is likely that pathogens of C. elegans face an evolutionary conundrum in the
84
attraction process. Pathogens that produce large amounts of attractant are likely to be consumed
85
often in the environment but are more likely to drive aversive learning in C. elegans at a more rapid
86
pace. Evidence of this stems from studies demonstrating that aversive learning and avoidance
87
develop rapidly in C. elegans when the strength of a negative stimulus increases [27]. Pathogens that
88
reduce the amount of attractant too much risk reducing their infectivity by lowering the likelihood
89
that C. elegans consumes them. Indeed, reducing the amount of a chemoattractant has been shown to
90
decrease attraction of C. elegans [28]. While this tradeoff is plausible, it remains unstudied, likely
91
owing to the inability to manipulate attractant production in natural pathogens of C. elegans. Many
92
interactions between C. elegans and its pathogens, including aversive learning, are thought to be
93
evolutionarily conserved across diverse species [19]. Thus, the study of this potential evolutionary
94
tradeoff might have implications in additional host-pathogen systems.
95
In this manuscript, we used an engineered strain of Escherichia coli to examine how changing
96
the production rate of a chemoattractant affects aversive learning and intoxication in mixed stage
5 97
populations of C. elegans. Unlike their natural counterparts, using engineered bacteria allowed us to
98
manipulate the parameters of attraction to examine how changing attractant production rate affects
99
aversive learning. Previous studies have used engineered bacteria to determine evolutionary tradeoffs
100
that are nearly impossible to examine using naturally occurring counterparts [29]. To address our
101
question, we used mixed-stage populations of C. elegans, which have been used in the past to simulate
102
naturally occurring nematode populations (e.g., [30]). We chose to use mixed-stage worms as the
103
evolutionary constraints that drove the interactions between learning. Chemoattraction and toxicity
104
likely arose under these conditions.
105 106
2. Materials and methods
107
2.1 Strains and growth conditions
108
All experiments were performed in modified M9 medium [1X M9 salts (48 mM Na2HPO4,
109
22 mM KH2PO4, 862 mM NaCl, 19 mM NH4Cl) 0.4% glucose, 0.1% casamino acids (Teknova,
110
Hollister, CA), 0.5% thiamine (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 100
111
mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, Amresco, Solon, OH)] buffered to pH 7.0 with
112
5 M KOH with 1% agar (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA). Single colonies were inoculated overnight into
113
3 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (MP Biomedicals, Solon OH). Culture media contained 50
114
µg/mL kanamycin and 100 µg/mL ampicillin for plasmid maintenance. Expression from the Plac
115
promoter was induced using 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Promega,
116
Madison, WI). Expression from the Ptet promoter was induced using anhydrotetracycline (atc, Acros
117
Organics, Geel, Belgium) at various concentrations.
118
We used a previously engineered strain of E. coli [31] that expresses a crystal toxin protein
119
(Cry5B), and a protein that produces an acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) chemoattractant [31] (LuxI,
120
Fig. 1a). An IPTG inducible Plac promoter controls expression of cry5B. An anhydrotetracycline (atc)
6 121
inducible Ptet promoter controls expression of luxI. The Cry5B protein causes intoxication in
122
nematodes by damaging the worm’s intestine, which results in arrested movement, vacuolated
123
intestines, and/or loss of internal structures [32].
124
C. elegans strains N2 (wildtype, Carolina Biological, Burlington, NC), lrn-1, mod-1 and eat-1
125
(Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota) were maintained on nematode growth agar
126
(Carolina Biological) containing a lawn of E. coli strain MG1655 (F- lambda- ilvG- rfb-50 rph-1, a
127
derivative of E. coli K-12 [33, 34]). Cultures were grown on 100 mm x 15 mm agar plates at room
128
temperature and sub-cultured by rinsing the plate with sterile dH2O and transferring 10 µL of
129
worms to a new plate [35]. We used mixed developmental stage worms grown on nematode growth
130
agar for approximately 7 days to examine how a population of C. elegans consisting of individuals in
131
multiple stages of development would behave. The average distribution of life stages (across three
132
independent plates) in these cultures was L1 = 50.6% ± 3.06, L2 = 27.74% ± 4.25, L3 = 16.25% ±
133
6.56, and L4 = 5.41% ± 3.52. C. elegans cultures that were grown independently across multiple days
134
were used as biological replicates. The average number of worms used in each assay is located in the
135
figure legend and was rounded to the nearest whole number.
136 137
2.2 Feeding rate
138
We grew either luxI-expressing and luxI/cry5B-expressing bacteria overnight on M9 agar
139
plates containing kanamycin (luxI) or kanamycin and ampicillin (luxI/cry5B) and various
140
concentrations of atc. When examining the luxI/cry5B-expressing strain, the medium did, or did not
141
as a control, contain 1 mM IPTG. 10 µL of M9 medium containing C. elegans was placed in the
142
center of the plate. Feeding rate was examined after the time indicated in the text and figure legend.
143
To determine feeding rate, we examined C. elegans using an Olympus IX73P2F microscope with a
144
DP-80 camera (Olympus Microscopes, Center Valley, PA) using 4X objective lens (with an
7 145
additional 2X magnification via a zoom function) using the bright field setting. We counted the
146
number of pharyngeal pumps during a 10 s period, which was converted to pumps/second. The
147
number of worms counted per condition was rounded to the nearest whole number and is presented
148
in the figure legend.
149 150
2.3 Modified learning assay
151
We grew overnight cultures of the cry5B/luxI expressing bacteria. These cultures were
152
washed and resuspendend in fresh M9 medium. 50 µL was spread across 5 mL of M9 medium with
153
0.5% agar housed in 6 well plates. Unless otherwise indicated, the medium contained 1 mM IPTG
154
and various concentrations of atc. After growing the bacteria at 37oC for 16 hours, C. elegans were
155
inoculated in the center of each plate. After feeding on bacteria for various time periods, the worms
156
were isolated by rinsing the plate with 1 mL of dH2O and centrifuging the worms for 2 minutes at
157
15 x g. The worms were washed three times with dH2O. Thirty minutes prior to the addition of C.
158
elegans, 5 µL of 20 µM AHL (3-oxohexanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OC6HSL, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint
159
Louis, MO) and 5 µL of ethanol (carrier solvent for AHL, not an attractant [21]) were placed on
160
randomly assigned and opposite sides of 5 mL of M9 medium with 0.5% agar in a 6 well plate (3 cm
161
apart and 1.5 cm from the initial position of the worms). C. elegans were then placed in the center of
162
the agar plate and was incubated at room temperature for one hour. Using a Leica M80 with a V-lux
163
1000 light source at 60X magnification (Leica Microsystem, Buffalo Grove, II), we counted the
164
number of worms located on the side of the plate that contained AHL or ethanol (control). Only C.
165
elegans that had moved away from the point of inoculation were counted and worms that were within
166
0.25 cm of the center of plate were not included. Choice index was calculated using the following
167
equation.
168
ℎ
=
(
)
(Eq. 1)
8 169
Attraction was characterized by movement towards AHL, which resulted in a positive choice index
170
(Eq. 1, (21)). A lack of attraction was characterized by a choice index that was not different from
171
zero, or that was negative.
172 173
2.4 Media switching assay
174
We grew overnight cultures of cry5B/luxI expressing bacteria. We inoculated 50 µL of
175
bacteria on agar plates containing 1 mM IPTG and 100 ng/mL of atc, 100 ng/mL atc or without
176
inducers (control). After growing bacteria under these conditions for 16 hours at 37oC, we
177
inoculated C. elegans. After 24 hours, the worms were removed from the agar plates, and washed
178
three times using ddH2O. Each population of worms was then placed on agar plates that contained
179
cry5B/luxI expressing bacteria (grown for 16 hours at 37oC) and 100 ng/mL of atc or without
180
inducers (control). Only worms that had been previously exposed to either the 1 mM IPTG/100
181
ng/mL atc or the 100 ng/mL atc conditions in the previous step were placed on plates containing
182
100 ng/mL of atc. After 24 hours, C. elegans were removed, washed three times in ddH2O and
183
subjected to our modified learning assay. Choice index calculated as per Eq. 1.
184 185
2.5 Quantifying Intoxication
186
A Leica M80 with a V-lux 1000 light source was used to observe C. elegans at 60X
187
magnification. We examined each nematode for 10 seconds. A lack of movement, which often
188
coincided with a highly vacuolated intestinal tract, during this period resulted in classifying the worm
189
as intoxicated [32].
190 191
2.6 Statistical analysis
9 192
Statistical tests are specified in the figure legends along with corresponding P values;
193
statistical significance was assumed if P ≤ 0.05. To compare choice indices to zero, we used a
194
student’s one-tailed t-test ((un-paired, unequal variance, using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA)). To
195
compare between choice indices, we used a student’s two-tailed t-test (un-paired, unequal variance).
196
For the feeding rate experiments, we collected data from each plate at different time points so we
197
took a repeated measures approach. We used a mixed model in JMP 14 [36] to test for differences in
198
feeding rates (using pumping rates as a proxy) among nematode strains with time (0, 24, 48, and 72
199
hours) as a repeated measure and a Tukey HSD test to conduct multiple comparisons. We explored
200
the effects of increasing ATC on feeding rates with a General Linear Model (GLM) in JMP, again
201
using the Tukey HSD test for multiple comparisons. For all other data, we used a student’s two-
202
tailed t-test (un-paired, unequal variance) to determine significance.
203 204
3. Results
205
3.1 Increasing expression of luxI in engineered bacteria increases feeding rate of C. elegans.
206
To determine if we could manipulate the feeding rate of C. elegans by changing the
207
expression level of luxI, we used a GFP expressing strain of bacteria to determine if increasing the
208
concentration of atc in the medium increased expression of elements downstream of the Ptet
209
promoter. We observed, as previously reported [37], that as the concentration of atc increased in the
210
growth medium, an increase in GFP was observed (Supplementary Fig. S1). We then allowed C.
211
elegans to feed on luxI-expressing bacteria grown in the presence of various concentrations of atc.
212
After 1 hour, we observed that as the concentration of atc in the medium increased, feeding rate
213
increased (Fig. 1b). Overall, we could increase the feeding rate of C. elegans by increasing the
214
concentration of atc in the growth medium.
215
10 216
3.2 Decreasing expression of luxI increases the time required for C. elegans to avoid AHL
217
Our previous publication found that concurrent expression of cry5B and luxI drives aversive
218
learning in C. elegans such that the worms are repulsed by AHL [31]. Building on this previous
219
finding, we sought to determine how the expression level of luxI would affect the time required for
220
C. elegans to learn to associate AHL with Cry5B toxicity. We first allowed C. elegans to feed on
221
engineered bacteria expressing cry5B/luxI grown in the presence of 100 ng/mL atc and 1 mM IPTG.
222
The concentration of these inducers allows maximal expression from the Ptet and Plac promoters,
223
respectively [37]. We then used a modified learning assay to quantify choice index (Eq. 1), and thus
224
learning (Fig. 2a). In line with previous publications, a positive choice index (Eq. 1) indicates
225
attraction to AHL, whereas a choice index that was negative or not statistically different than zero
226
indicated learning. After 1 hour of feeding on the engineered bacteria, we observed that C. elegans
227
remained attracted to AHL as indicated through a positive choice index (Fig. 2b). After 3 hours, C.
228
elegans had a choice index that was not different than zero. After 5 hours, the choice index became
229
negative. Overall, our results suggest that aversive learning towards AHL occurred in as little as 3
230
hours when 100 ng/mL of atc was included in the growth medium.
231
We sought to determine how aversive learning would be impacted as the concentration of
232
atc, and thus expression of luxI, decreased in the growth medium. We performed the experiment
233
described above and reduced the concentration of atc in the medium while keeping the
234
concentration of IPTG (1 mM) constant. We observed that when the concentration of atc was
235
reduced to between 40 and 80 ng/mL, aversive learning was observed after C. elegans fed on the
236
engineered bacteria for 48 hours (Fig. 2c). When the concentration of atc was 10-20 ng/mL,
237
learning, as measured using the choice index, was not evident after 72 hours of feeding. We note
238
that transgene expression in our experimental setup was generally stable over the entire period of
239
feeding (Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, and Supplementary Fig. S2). We chose
11 240
not to measure feeding rate past 72 hours as this would likely require the addition of nutrients or
241
transferring the worms to a new agar plate. Both of these manipulations could result in death of the
242
worms, or additional stressors, which could influence choice index, and thus our ability to quantify
243
aversive learning.
244
To confirm that the observed decrease in choice index was not primarily due to habituation
245
to AHL, or expression of cry5B alone, we grew the engineered bacteria on agar plates that
246
independently contained 100 ng/mL atc, 1 mM IPTG or did not contain inducers. We allowed C.
247
elegans to feed on these bacteria for 72 hours whereupon we removed the worms and performed our
248
learning assay. We observed that C. elegans remained attracted to AHL after 72 hours of exposure to
249
bacteria independently expressing luxI and cry5B (Fig. 2d). This indicated that habituation to AHL,
250
or toxicity from Cry5B, could not be primarily responsible for the trends observed in Fig. 2c.
251
Instead, concurrent expression of luxI and cry5B was required to drive aversion towards AHL in C.
252
elegans.
253
To confirm that the decrease in choice indices observed in Fig. 2b and c was due to learning,
254
we used a learning deficient strain of C. elegans (lrn-1) [38], which has been previously shown to be
255
impaired in associative olfactory learning, but not in non-associative learning (e.g., habituation) [39].
256
We allowed this strain to feed on bacteria concurrently expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI
257
(various concentrations of atc) for 72 hours. Using our learning assay, we observed that the lrn-1
258
worms remained attracted to AHL as indicated through a positive choice index at all concentrations
259
of atc examined (Fig. 2e). Moreover, lrn-1 worms also remained attracted to AHL after feeding on
260
bacteria that independently expressed luxI (100 ng/mL atc), and cry5B (1 mM IPTG, Fig. 2f).
261
Finally, we allowed wildtype C. elegans to feed on bacteria expressing both cry5B and luxI (1
262
mM IPTG and 100 ng/mL of atc) for 24 hours (Fig. 2g). We then carefully transferred these worms
263
to medium where bacteria were only expressing luxI (100 ng/mL of atc). After 24 hours, we
12 264
performed our modified learning assay. We observed that C. elegans remained attracted to AHL
265
under these conditions as indicated by a positive choice index. Furthermore, when C. elegans were fed
266
on bacteria expressing only luxI (100 ng/mL atc through the experiment) or bacteria that were not
267
expressing either transgene (0 mM IPTG/ 0 ng/mL of atc), wildtype C. elegans remained attracted to
268
AHL.
269 270
3.3 C. elegans reduces its feeding rate as a result of aversive learning
271
Previous studies have demonstrated that C. elegans will reduce its feeding rate when
272
confronted with pathogenic bacteria [25] and repulsive odorants [24] as a result of aversive learning.
273
We sought to determine if C. elegans was reducing its feeding rate in response to our engineered
274
bacteria. We measured the feeding rate of C. elegans exposed to bacteria concurrently expressing
275
cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI grown on plates containing increasing concentrations of atc. When the
276
medium contained 100 ng/mL of atc, we observed a significant decrease in the feeding rate at 24, 48
277
and 72 hours relative to the feeding rate measured after 1 hour (Fig. 3a). In contrast, when the
278
medium contained 50 ng/mL of atc, feeding rate was not reduced after 24 hours as compared to the
279
feeding rate observed after 1 hour. However, after 48 and 72 hours, we observed that there was a
280
significant decrease in feeding rate under this condition as compared to worms observed at 1 hour
281
and 24 hours. A reduction in feeding rate was not observed when the medium contained 10 ng/mL
282
atc after 24, 48 and 72 hours.
283
To test if the reduction in feeding rate was due to aversive learning, we performed the
284
experiment described above but used the lrn-1 strain (Fig. 3b)., as well as an additional learning
285
deficiency strain, mod-1 (Fig. 3c). We generally observed that, when atc was included in the medium
286
at various concentrations, there was no significant reduction in feeding rate after 1, 24, 48 and 72
287
hours of feeding on bacteria expressing both luxI and cry5B (1 mM IPTG). An exception to this
13 288
trend was observed when we compared the feeding rate of lrn-1 worms after 1 hour and 48 hours on
289
medium containing 100 ng/mL atc. We observed a significant decrease in feeding rate after 48
290
hours. However, this reduction was not observed at 72 hours.
291
To determine if expression of cry5B alone could account for the reduction in feeding rate
292
observed in C. elegans (Fig. 3a), we allowed wildtype, lrn-1 and mod-1 worms to feed on cry5B-
293
expressing bacteria for 24, 48 and 72 hours (1 mM IPTG in the medium, Fig. 3d). We observed a
294
significant decrease in feeding rate at 48 hours, but not after 72 hours, for the wildtype C. elegans
295
strain. A reduction in feeding rate was not observed for the learning deficient lrn-1 and mod-1 strains.
296
We note that basal feeding rate (in the absence of IPTG or atc) of the wildtype, lrn-1 and mod-1
297
worms is statistically identical indicating that physiological differences in feeding rate cannot account
298
for our results (Supplementary Fig. S4).
299 300
3.4 The percentage of intoxicated worms is maximized at intermediate expression of luxI
301
As the Cry5B protein intoxicates C. elegans through ingestion [32], we hypothesized that
302
changes in feeding rate would affect intoxication efficacy. To initially test this hypothesis, we allowed
303
a pumping deficient strain of C. elegans (eat-1) to feed on bacteria expressing cry5B for 48 hours. We
304
observed a significant decrease in the percentage of intoxicated eat-1 worms as compared to wildtype
305
C. elegans (Fig. 4a). This significant decrease was not apparent after the worms fed on the bacteria for
306
144 hours (Supplementary Fig. S5a), indicating that physiological differences between the strains, in
307
terms of the effectiveness of Cry5B, cannot account for this difference. In general, our results
308
suggest that reducing feeding rate reduces intoxication rate in the short term.
309
We then allowed wildtype C. elegans to feed on bacteria expressing cry5B (1mM IPTG) and
310
luxI (various concentrations of atc in the medium). After 24 hours, we observed that the percentage
311
of intoxicated worms tended to increase as the concentration of atc in the medium was increased.
14 312
After 48 hours, we observed that the percentage of intoxicated worms followed a biphasic trend
313
with increasing atc (Fig. 4b), where the percentage of intoxicated worms was highest at 60 ng/mL of
314
atc. This trend was largely maintained at 72 hours. To determine if this biphasic trend was owing to
315
aversive learning, we allowed the lrn-1 strain to feed on bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and
316
luxI (various concentrations of atc, Fig. 4c). After 24 hours, we observed a similar trend to when
317
wildtype worms were used in the assay. However, after 48 and 72 hours, and contrary to the
318
biphasic trend observed with worms capable of learning, we observed that, in general, the
319
percentage of intoxicated worms increased as a function of atc concentration. We confirmed that
320
this difference was not due to strain specific susceptibility to intoxication by Cry5B. Indeed, we
321
observed that the percentage of intoxicated wildtype and lrn-1 worms was statistically identical when
322
fed on bacteria that only expressed cry5B (Supplementary Fig. S5b).
323 324
4. Discussion
325
We propose that interactions between AHL attractant driven feeding rate, and Cry5B driven
326
aversive learning maximized the percentage of intoxicated worms at intermediate concentrations of
327
atc (Fig. 5). At the highest examined expression rate of luxI (100 ng/mL), increased feeding allowed
328
C. elegans to quickly associate AHL with harm from Cry5B. In this scenario, C. elegans quickly reduces
329
its feeding rate, which serves to reduce the amount of Cry5B expressing bacteria consumed. This, in
330
turn, reduces the percentage of Cry5B-intoxicated worms. At low concentrations of atc (e.g., 10
331
ng/mL atc), AHL driven feeding rate was low, and thus the rate at which C. elegans was exposed to
332
Cry5B was also low. Subsequently, C. elegans does not learn to associate AHL with harm over 72
333
hours. Due to the reduced feeding rate, intoxication is also reduced under this condition. At
334
intermediate concentrations of atc (60 ng/mL) where the percentage of intoxicated worms was the
335
highest, the feeding rate of the worms was increased due to the increased amount of AHL. The
15 336
amount of AHL was sufficiently small so that aversive learning occurred at a reduced rate. As a
337
result, the worms experienced an extended time where they were exposed to Cry5B through
338
ingestion, which increased the percentage of intoxicated worms in the population. After 48 hours,
339
the worms reduced their feeding rate owing to aversive learning. These trends in feeding rate and in
340
the percentage of intoxicated worms were largely abolished when a learning deficient strain was
341
used, thus offering additional evidence that aversive learning plays an important role in this process.
342
We note that our use of mixed-stage populations of C. elegans might have added variability to our
343
data as previous studies have noted stage-dependent differences in response to crystal toxin proteins
344
[32]. Nevertheless, the trends presented in our manuscript appear to be robust according to our
345
analyses, and thus this additional variability does not appear to confound our results nor their
346
interpretation.
347
It is important to note that it is challenging, if not impossible, to disentangle the effects of
348
cry5B-driven learning, and cry5B-driven intoxication, on feeding rate. As C. elegans progresses towards
349
a state of complete intoxication, it is inevitable that the worm will reduce, if not completely
350
eliminate, feeding. Nevertheless, on the one hand, there are several key findings in our data that
351
support the notion that C. elegans reduces its feeding rate as a result of aversive learning. First,
352
reductions in feeding rate are largely observed in wildtype, but not learning deficient (lrn-1 and mod-
353
1), C. elegans strains. Importantly, all three C. elegans strains have the same basal feeding rate
354
(Supplementary Fig. S4), and susceptibility to Cry5B intoxication (Supplementary Fig. S5b),
355
indicating that physiological differences alone cannot account for these trends. Second, reductions
356
in feeding rate in wildtype C. elegans coincide with the concentration of atc. That is, C. elegans reduces
357
its feeding rate more rapidly when exposed to higher amounts of AHL via increased luxI expression.
358
Third, when cry5B is expressed alone, the reduction in feeding rate is not sustained over 72 hours.
359
Finally, over the course of 72 hours, feeding rate is reduced by a large percent (68% 1 hour vs. 72
16 360
hours, 53% 24 hours vs. 72 hours) when wildtype C. elegans fed upon bacteria expressing both cry5B
361
and luxI (100ng/mL). In comparison, feeding rate is reduced by 36% (24 hours vs. 72 hours) when
362
wildtype C. elegans fed upon bacteria expressing only cry5B. However, on the other hand, there is
363
evidence that a reduction in feeding rate is occurring as a result of a physiological response to cry5B.
364
It is clear that exposure to cry5B alone can reduce feeding rate in C. elegans (Fig. 3d). Our results
365
presented in Fig. 2g suggest that sustained exposure to Cry5B is required to maintain aversion to
366
AHL. Previous work has indicated that learned aversion strategies can be reduced, or all together
367
eliminated, depending upon the pattern of exposure to aversive cues [40]. We also cannot exclude
368
the possibility that the observed effects are temporary or reversible once exposure to bacteria
369
expressing cry5B and luxI is discontinued. The mechanism of action of these toxins involves direct
370
binding with and piercing of gut membranes, which leads to vacuolization and pitting within gut
371
tissues [41]. The resulting pathogenic effects are persistent, and over time induce alterations
372
consistent with starvation, as well as other long term fitness consequences such as decreased brood
373
size and survival (e.g., [42]). Tissue repair mechanisms in nematodes remain poorly understood.
374
They have limited capacity to recover from and repair damage to their cuticle and epidermis [43], but
375
their ability to repair damage to gut membranes due to toxins such as Cry5B remain unknown and
376
require further study. Taken together, while we cannot exclude the notion that harm due to Cry5B is
377
also reducing feeding rate, evidence provided by learning deficient C. elegans indicates that aversive
378
learning is playing a large role.
379
Interplay between olfaction-mediated attraction and avoidance has been observed in
380
additional species. For example, in Drosophila, attraction to, or avoidance of, CO2 is context
381
dependent. In general, flies avoid CO2 as this gas is often emitted by stressed flies [44]. However,
382
several food sources of Drosophila, including ripening fruit, also emit CO2 and thus the flies must
383
discriminate between CO2 emitted due to stress, and CO2 emitted by a food source. To accomplish
17 384
this, additional odorants emitted by food sources attenuate the repulsive nature of CO2 at the neural
385
level [45], thus allowing flies to follow CO2 towards food sources [46]. In rats, neonatal odors are
386
attractive to parents but are avoided by sexually naïve individuals [47]. Bonobos (Pan paniscus) will
387
alter their feeding strategies using multisensory cues to reduce the incidence of infection if their food
388
source is contaminated with the feces of conspecifics, which may harbor pathogens [48]. In humans,
389
kissing or proximity to the mouth can be used to assess mate quality [49] through olfaction.
390
However, kissing also poses a risk for oral pathogen transmission [50]. Humans may risk pathogen
391
transmission from a mouth of someone who is considered a high-quality potential mate. Oral
392
pathogens that can ‘hide’ odorants, which are associated with aversion (or disgust) in humans, may
393
be more likely to be transmitted in the population.
394
Our system inherently examined pathogen transmission during nutrient acquisition via
395
predation, or consumption of a food source. Indeed, tradeoffs between various measures of
396
attraction (ease of catch, size of prey) and infection via consumption have been described. For
397
example, oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) tend to consume intermediately sized cockles
398
(Cerastoderma edule) to avoid parasitism [6]. Larger cockles are considered more attractive as they
399
provide additional nutrients but are also more likely to contain parasites. In a more general sense,
400
some pathogens manipulate the behavior of the host to make it more attractive and easier to
401
capture, which facilitates transmission [51]. It is conceivable that evolutionary constraints, similar to
402
those observed in our study, have shaped these host-pathogen interactions. For example, prey
403
species that exhibit drastically abnormal pathogen-driven behavior relative to their conspecifics may
404
initially appear more attractive to predators, but could end up being more easily identified [52], and
405
avoided, thus reducing parasite transmission. In contrast, prey that is only marginally different from
406
their conspecifics in terms of ability to catch will likely be a proficient vector for pathogen
407
transmission. In our system, the production of a chemoattractant at a high-level likely results in a
18 408
less effective pathogen in the long term. Conversely, while one that produces chemoattractant at an
409
intermediate level will reduce the rate of initial consumption, it will also maximize its long-term
410
fitness by temporarily avoiding learning strategies, thus promoting infection. In congruence with our
411
results, pathogens likely walk a fine evolutionary line when tuning their behavior to become more
412
‘attractive’ to hosts.
413
As C. elegans is navigating its natural habitat, it uses chemoattractants to find bacterial food
414
sources. Bacterial [23, 26] and fungal pathogens [53] produce chemoattractants that attract C. elegans.
415
Previous studies using some of these pathogens have demonstrated that C. elegans will quickly learn
416
to avoid the chemoattractant, and thus the pathogen. This short-term response observed in the
417
laboratory setting could be a mechanism that drives the evolution of a more ingrained avoidance
418
strategy in C. elegans populations. Indeed, long-term evolutionary studies have shown that C. elegans
419
can evolve increased avoidance behavior to bacterial pathogens [54]. Recently, a study has
420
demonstrated that C. elegans can pass feeding based avoidance strategies to its young. C. elegans who
421
feed on the bacterial pathogen P. aeruginosa will quickly learn to associate it with harm. Through
422
epigenetic changes, this aversion to P. aeruginosa can be passed onto offspring and is apparently
423
stable for up to four generations [55]. Taken together, short term behavioral responses, or more
424
long-term evolutionary changes, are likely an important mechanism to increase the survival of C.
425
elegans in its natural environment. Interestingly, there appears to be natural variation in the degree of
426
initial attraction of C. elegans strains isolated from different geographic areas towards the pathogen
427
Serratia marcescens [56]. This variation in initial attraction could be shaped by variations in the
428
pathogens, and the amount of chemoattractants they produce, encountered in each geographic area.
429
Encountering pathogens that produce more chemoattractant may force C. elegans populations to
430
develop avoidance strategies more rapidly to ensure their survival.
431
19 432
Acknowledgements
433
This research is supported by a President’s Faculty Research and Development Grant
434
#335318 through Nova Southeastern University. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis
435
Genetics Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40
436
OD010440). The plasmid containing cry5B was a kind gift from Dr. Raffi Aroian.
437 438
Competing Interests
439 440
The authors have no competing financial interests.
441 442
References
443
[1] Kaltz O, Shykoff JA. Local adaptation in host–parasite systems. Heredity 1998;81:361.
444
[2] Curtis VA. Infection-avoidance behaviour in humans and other animals. Trends in Immunology
445
2014;35:457-64.
446
[3] Soares MP, Gozzelino R, Weis S. Tissue damage control in disease tolerance. Trends in
447
immunology 2014;35:483-94.
448
[4] Schneider DS, Ayres JS. Two ways to survive infection: what resistance and tolerance can teach
449
us about treating infectious diseases. Nature Reviews Immunology 2008;8:889.
450
[5] Kavaliers M, Colwell DD. Discrimination by female mice between the odours of parasitized and
451
non-parasitized males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1995;261:31-5.
452
[6] Norris K. A trade-off between energy intake and exposure to parasites in oystercatchers feeding
453
on a bivalve mollusc. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences
454
1999;266:1703-9.
20 455
[7] Franks NR, Hooper J, Webb C, Dornhaus A. Tomb evaders: house-hunting hygiene in ants.
456
Biology Letters 2005;1:190-2.
457
[8] Sato Y, Saito Y, Sakagami T. Rules for nest sanitation in a social spider mite, Schizotetranychus
458
miscanthi Saito (Acari: Tetranychidae). Ethology 2003;109:713-24.
459
[9] Schmid Hempel P. Evolutionary parasitology: the integrated study of infections, immunology,
460
ecology, and genetics. 2011.
461
[10] George J, Jenkins NE, Blanford S, Thomas MB, Baker TC. Malaria mosquitoes attracted by
462
fatal fungus. PLoS One 2013;8:e62632.
463
[11] Eigenbrode SD, Ding H, Shiel P, Berger PH. Volatiles from potato plants infected with potato
464
leafroll virus attract and arrest the virus vector, Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae).
465
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2002;269:455-60.
466
[12] Darby C, Cosma CL, Thomas JH, Manoil C. Lethal paralysis of Caenorhabditis elegans by
467
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1999;96:15202-7.
468
[13] Mann RS, Ali JG, Hermann SL, Tiwari S, Pelz-Stelinski KS, Alborn HT, et al. Induced release
469
of a plant-defense volatile ‘deceptively’attracts insect vectors to plants infected with a bacterial
470
pathogen. PLoS pathogens 2012;8:e1002610.
471
[14] Robinson A, Busula AO, Voets MA, Beshir KB, Caulfield JC, Powers SJ, et al. Plasmodium-
472
associated changes in human odor attract mosquitoes. Proceedings of the national academy of
473
sciences 2018;115:E4209-E18.
474
[15] Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM. The worm has turned microbial virulence modeled in
475
Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends in microbiology 2005;13:119-27.
476
[16] Aballay A, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans as a host for the study of host–pathogen
477
interactions. Current opinion in microbiology 2002;5:97-101.
21 478
[17] Kurz CL, Chauvet S, Andrès E, Aurouze M, Vallet I, Michel GP, et al. Virulence factors of the
479
human opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens identified by in vivo screening. The EMBO journal
480
2003;22:1451-60.
481
[18] Schulenburg H, Félix M-A. The natural biotic environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics
482
2017;206:55-86.
483
[19] Meisel JD, Kim DH. Behavioral avoidance of pathogenic bacteria by Caenorhabditis elegans.
484
Trends in Immunology 2014;35:465-70.
485
[20] Ward S. Chemotaxis by the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: identification of attractants and
486
analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
487
1973;70:817-21.
488
[21] Beale E, Li G, Tan M-W, Rumbaugh KP. Caenorhabditis elegans senses bacterial autoinducers.
489
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2006;72:5135-7.
490
[22] Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. Detection and avoidance
491
of a natural product from the pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens by Caenorhabditis elegans.
492
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007;104:2295-300.
493
[23] Niu Q, Huang X, Zhang L, Xu J, Yang D, Wei K, et al. A Trojan horse mechanism of bacterial
494
pathogenesis against nematodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010;107:16631-
495
6.
496
[24] Li Z, Li Y, Yi Y, Huang W, Yang S, Niu W, et al. Dissecting a central flip-flop circuit that
497
integrates contradictory sensory cues in C. elegans feeding regulation. Nature communications
498
2012;3:776.
499
[25] Palominos MF, Verdugo L, Gabaldon C, Pollak B, Ortíz-Severín J, Varas MA, et al.
500
Transgenerational diapause as an avoidance strategy against bacterial pathogens in Caenorhabditis
501
elegans. mBio 2017;8:e01234-17.
22 502
[26] Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in
503
Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2005;438:179-84.
504
[27] Amano H, Maruyama IN. Aversive olfactory learning and associative long-term memory in
505
Caenorhabditis elegans. Learning & Memory 2011;18:654-65.
506
[28] Saeki S, Yamamoto M, Iino Y. Plasticity of chemotaxis revealed by paired presentation of a
507
chemoattractant and starvation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Experimental
508
Biology 2001;204:1757-64.
509
[29] Tanouchi Y, Smith R, You L. Engineering microbial systems to explore ecological and
510
evolutionary dynamics. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2012;23:791-7.
511
[30] Félix M-A, Duveau F. Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of
512
Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. BMC biology 2012;10:59.
513
[31] Bracho OR, Manchery C, Haskell EC, Blanar CA, Smith RP. Circumvention of learning
514
increases intoxication efficacy of nematicidal engineered bacteria. ACS Synthetic Biology 2016;5:241-
515
9.
516
[32] Wei J-Z, Hale K, Carta L, Platzer E, Wong C, Fang S-C, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis crystal
517
proteins that target nematodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003;100:2760-5.
518
[33] Bachmann B. Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12.
519
in: F Neidhardt (Ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular molecular biology, ASM Press,
520
Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 2460-88.
521
[34] Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. The complete genome
522
sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. 1997;277:1453-62.
523
[35] Stiernagle T. Maintenance of C. elegans (February 11, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans
524
Research Community, WormBook, http://www.wormbook.org
525
[36] SAS Inc. JMP. Cary, NC, 1989-2019.
23 526
[37] Lutz R, Bujard H. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via
527
the lacR/O, the tetR/O and araC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Research 1997;25:1203-
528
10.
529
[38] Wen JY, Kumar N, Morrison G, Rambaldini G, Runciman S, Rousseau J, et al. Mutations that
530
prevent associative learning in C. elegans. Behavioral neuroscience 1997;111:354.
531
[39] Morrison GE, Wen JY, Runciman S, van der Kooy D. Olfactory associative learning in
532
Caenorhabditis elegans is impaired in lrn-1 and lrn-2 mutants. Behavioral neuroscience 1999;113:358.
533
[40] Nishijima S, Maruyama IN. Appetitive olfactory learning and long-term associative memory in
534
Caenorhabditis elegans. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 2017;11:80.
535
[41] Höss S, Menzel R, Gessler F, Nguyen HT, Jehle JA, Traunspurger W. Effects of insecticidal
536
crystal proteins (Cry proteins) produced by genetically modified maize (Bt maize) on the nematode
537
Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental pollution 2013;178:147-51.
538
[42] Marroquin LD, Elyassnia D, Griffitts JS, Feitelson JS, Aroian RV. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)
539
toxin susceptibility and isolation of resistance mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
540
Genetics 2000;155:1693-9.
541
[43] Chisholm AD. Epidermal wound healing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Advances in
542
wound care 2015;4:264-71.
543
[44] Suh GS, Wong AM, Hergarden AC, Wang JW, Simon AF, Benzer S, et al. A single population
544
of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila. Nature
545
2004;431:854.
546
[45] Turner SL, Ray A. Modification of CO 2 avoidance behaviour in Drosophila by inhibitory
547
odorants. Nature 2009;461:277.
548
[46] Wasserman S, Salomon A, Frye MA. Drosophila tracks carbon dioxide in flight. Current
549
Biology 2013;23:301-6.
24 550
[47] Knobil E. Knobil and Neill's physiology of reproduction. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2006.
551
[48] Sarabian C, Belais R, MacIntosh AJ. Feeding decisions under contamination risk in bonobos.
552
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2018;373:20170195.
553
[49] Wlodarski R, Dunbar RI. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mate desirability.
554
Evolutionary Psychology 2014;12:178–99.
555
[50] Tybur JM, Lieberman D. Human pathogen avoidance adaptations. Current Opinion in
556
Psychology 2016;7:6-11.
557
[51] Gopko M, Mikheev VN, Taskinen J. Deterioration of basic components of the anti-predator
558
behavior in fish harboring eye fluke larvae. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2017;71:68.
559
[52] de Andrade Moral R, Demétrio CGB, Hinde J, Godoy WAC, Fernandes FS. Parasitism-
560
mediated prey selectivity in laboratory conditions and implications for biological control. Basic and
561
Applied Ecology 2017;19:67-75.
562
[53] Hsueh Y-P, Gronquist MR, Schwarz EM, Nath RD, Lee C-H, Gharib S, et al. Nematophagous
563
fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora mimics olfactory cues of sex and food to lure its nematode prey. Elife
564
2017;6:e20023.
565
[54] Penley MJ, Morran LT. Host mating system and coevolutionary dynamics shape the evolution
566
of parasite avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans host populations. Parasitology 2018;145:724-30.
567
[55] Moore RS, Kaletsky R, Murphy CT. C. elegans pathogenic learning confers multigenerational
568
pathogen avoidance. bioRxiv 2018;476416.
569
[56] Glater EE, Rockman MV, Bargmann CI. Multigenic natural variation underlies Caenorhabditis
570
elegans olfactory preference for the bacterial pathogen Serratia marcescens. G3: Genes, Genomes,
571
Genetics 2014;4:265-76.
572 573
25 574
Figure legends
575 576
Fig. 1: Increasing the expression rate of luxI increases feeding rate.
577
a. Diagram of gene circuit housed in the engineered bacteria used in this study. An IPTG inducible
578
Plac promoter controls expression of cry5B, which encodes the Cry5B crystal toxin protein. The
579
atc inducible Ptet promoter controls the expression of luxI, which encodes the LuxI protein that
580
produces an AHL chemoattractant.
581
b. Feeding rate of C. elegans feeding on luxI-expressing bacteria for 1 hour with increasing
582
concentration of atc in the growth medium. When all data points from experiments containing
583
atc are compared, P < 0.001 (GLM). Average number of worms per replicate = 27. Standard
584
deviation from three biological replicates
585 586
Fig. 2: The expression level of luxI influences the time required for C. elegans to develop
587
aversive learning towards AHL.
588
a. Schematic of the modified learning assay. On one side of the plate, we placed AHL. On the
589
opposite side of the plate, we placed ethanol (carrier solved control). After allowing the worms
590
move for one hour, the number of worms on either side of the plate was counted. Attraction to
591
AHL resulted in a positive choice index (Eq. 1). Aversive learning resulted in a choice index that
592
was not statistically different from zero, or that was negative. Our learning assay produces
593
qualitatively similar results when compared to a traditional learning assay that uses a large agar
594
plate and sodium azide (Supplementary Fig. S3).
595
b. Choice indices of wildtype (wt) C. elegans that fed on engineered bacteria expressing cry5B and
596
luxI (1 mM IPTG and 100 ng/mL atc) for the time indicated. When C. elegans fed on the
597
engineered bacteria for 1 hour, the choice index was significantly greater than zero (P = 0.005,
26 598
one-tailed t-test). After 3 and 5 hours of feeding, the choice index was not significantly different
599
from zero (P > 0.06, one-tailed t-test). Average worms counted per replicate = 16. For panels b-
600
g, standard deviation from a minimum of three biological replicates and all data points with * are
601
not different from zero (P ≥ 0.057, one-tailed t-test). For data points without the star, choice
602
index was significantly greater that zero (P < 0.048, one-tailed t-test).
603
c. Choice indices of C. elegans that fed on bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI
604
(increasing concentrations of atc). For a given concentration of atc, once learning occurred, we
605
no longer performed a learning assay resulting in different scales along the x-axis. Average
606
number of worms counted = 25. The 0 ng/mL atc condition does not contain IPTG.
607
d. Choice indices of C. elegans that fed on bacteria independently expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG),
608
luxI (100 ng/mL atc) or neither (0 mM IPTG, 0 ng/mL atc) for 72 hours. A positive choice
609
index (attraction towards AHL) was observed in all cases (P < 0.03, one-tailed t-test). Average
610
number of worms counted = 47.
611
e. Choice indices of a learning deficient strain of C. elegans (lrn-1) that fed on bacteria expressing
612
cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI (increasing concentrations of atc) for 72 hours. A positive choice
613
index (attraction towards AHL) was observed in all cases (P ≤ 0.043, one-tailed t-test). Average
614
number of worms counted = 86. The 0 ng/mL atc condition does not contain IPTG.
615
f. Choice indices of the lrn-1 strain fed on bacteria independently expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG),
616
luxI (100 ng/mL atc) or neither (0 mM IPTG, 0 ng/mL atc) for 72 hours. A positive choice
617
index (attraction towards AHL) was observed in all cases (P ≤ 0.03, one-tailed t-test). Average
618
number of worms counted = 64.
619
g. Choice indices of wildtype (wt) C. elegans fed on bacteria expressing cry5B and luxI (1 mM IPTG
620
and 100 ng/mL of atc), luxI (100 ng/mL atc) or neither gene (control) for 24 hours. Worm
621
feeding on bacteria expressing cry5B and luxI or luxI were subsequently transferred to bacteria
27 622
expressing only luxI (100 ng/mL of atc) or neither gene (control) and allowed to feed for 24
623
hours. A choice assay was then performed. A positive choice index (attraction towards AHL)
624
was observed in all cases (P ≤ 0.03, one-tailed t-test). Average number of worms counted = 40.
625 626
Fig. 3: A reduction in feeding rate is observed in C. elegans at an intermediate concentration
627
of atc after feeding on cry5B and luxI- expressing bacteria for 48 hours.
628
a. Feeding rate (pharyngeal contractions) of wildtype (wt) C. elegans that fed on bacteria
629
expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI (various concentrations of atc). Wildtype worms fed
630
on medium containing 100 ng/mL had a significantly lower feeding rate after 24, 48 and 72
631
hours as compared to one hour (P ≤ 0.0008, GLM with Tukey’s HSD, *). Worms fed on
632
medium containing 50 ng/mL atc did not show a reduced feeding rate at 24 hours as
633
compared to one hour (P = 1.0, GLM with Tukey’s HSD) atc. After 48 and 72 hours, this
634
feeding rate was reduced as compared to 24 hours (P ≤ 0.0007, GLM with Tukey’s HSD,
635
**). For all panels, standard deviation from individual feeding rates from a minimum of three
636
biological replicates. Average number of worms counted in each condition = 61.
637
b. Feeding rate (pharyngeal contractions) of learning deficient C. elegans (lrn-1) that fed on
638
bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI (various concentrations of atc). There was
639
no significant difference in feeding rate across concentrations of atc with the exception of a
640
decrease between one and 48 hours on medium containing 100 ng/mL atc (P = 0.008,
641
GLM, *). Average number of worms counted in each condition = 58.
642
c. Feeding rate (pharyngeal contractions) of learning deficient C. elegans (mod-1) that fed on
643
bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and luxI (various concentrations of atc). There was
644
no significant decrease in feeding rate across concentrations of atc (GLM with Tukey’s
645
HSD). Average number of worms counted in each condition = 80.
28 646
d. Feeding rate (pharyngeal contractions) of wildtype (wt) and learning deficient (lrn-1 and mod-
647
1) C. elegans fed on bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG/0 ng/mL atc). There was a
648
reduction in feeding rate for the wildtype strain between 24 and 48 hours (P = 0.014, GLM),
649
but this did not continue for 72 hours. A reduction was not observed in the learning
650
deficient strains (P > 0.202, GLM with Tukey’s HSD). Average number of worms counted
651
in each condition = 67.
652 653
Fig. 4: A biphasic relationship between expression of luxI and the percentage of intoxicated
654
worms.
655
a. The percentage of intoxicated wildtype (wt) and pumping defective (eat-1) C. elegans fed on
656
cry5B-expressing (1 mM IPTG) bacteria. The percentage of intoxicated worms was higher in
657
the wildtype strain as compared to the eat-1 strain after 48 hours (P =0.047, two-tailed t-test).
658
When the medium lacked IPTG, the percentage of intoxicated worms was reduced (P <
659
0.011, two-tailed t-test). Average number worms per assay = 29. In all panels, standard
660
deviation from a minimum of three biological replicates.
661
b. The percentage of intoxicated worms fed on bacteria expressing cry5B (1 mM IPTG) and
662
luxI (various concentrations of atc). The highest percentage of intoxicated worms was
663
observed at 60 ng/mL and after 48 (60 ng/mL vs. 100 ng/mL, P = 0.05, 60 ng/mL vs. 10
664
ng/mL, P =0.004) and 72 hours of feeding (60 ng/mL vs. 100 ng/mL, P = 0.079, 60
665
ng/mL vs. 10 ng/mL, P =0.018, two-tailed t-tests). Average number of worms counted at all
666
time points = 131.
667
c. The percentage of intoxicated worms when learning deficient (lrn-1) C. elegans fed on
668
engineered bacteria that expressed cry5B (1mM IPTG) and luxI (various concentrations of
669
atc) for 48 hours. Average number of worms counted at all time points = 118.
29 670 671
Fig. 5: We hypothesize that the biphasic relationship between intoxication efficacy and
672
attraction (atc concentration) is due to interactions between feeding rate and aversive
673
learning. As the amount of attractant increases, feeding rate increases. This increases the rate at
674
which the worms are exposed to Cry5B through ingestion, which increases the rate of aversive
675
learning. As a result, they reduce their feeding rate, which decreases the rate at which they are
676
intoxicated. The interaction between these two trends results in the percentage of intoxicated worms
677
being maximized at intermediate amounts of AHL attractant (atc concentration) after 48 and 72
678
hours of feeding. We note that we cannot rule out that the intoxication from ingestion of Cry5B is
679
also reducing the feeding rate in addition to aversive learning.
680