BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
A
REACTIVE
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ASPARTYL
RESIDUE
OF
PEPSIN
:x Keelin Charles
Oh-Kil
of
Fry
F. Kettering Research Yellow Springs, Ohio
Kim,
Department
T.
J&-gen
Spona,
Chemistry,
and
The
University
Laboratory 45387
Gordon
A.
Pennsylvania
Park,
State
Pennsylvania
*;I;
Hamilton University
16802
Received January 26, 1968
Recently
it
was
inactivated
The
results
pepsin.
the
the
the
pepsin
group
be
present
of an
specifically
, refluxing
by
the
active
site that
that
the
amino
Be-Val-Asp-Thr.
another
class
a different
of DPB
(HPB) acid
This of
pepsin
section
of
the
aspartyl
inhibitors,
Cooper,
1966). pepsin
molecule
catalysis.
the
materials
Spona,
method
of McPhee
obtained
from
the
crude
-2
NaOH
in
methanol
with for
2 hours,
and
and
methods
Crowell, and
1967).
Klingsberg
product
evaporation
HPB
most
was A
reaction
acidification of
the
(1944).
of the
by:
were
of the
of to
pH
solvent,
* *,~ Contribution Alfred P.
(DPB).
indicating
Wassermann,and
enzymic
noted, (Hamilton,
of the was
near
and
is:
attacked
the
or
evidence
residue,
Vratsanos,
in
-2
l-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanone-2
aspartyl
define
pepsin
Methods
previously extension
of
that
-4-phenylbutanone at
report
1967)
Crowell,
1 -diazo
residue
results
involved
we
ester
(Erlanger,
phenylbutanone water
an
that
and
material
form
from
Unless
an
to
and
occurred
communication
different
the
of
reaction
aspartyl
may
given
the
this
Therefore,
Spona,
amount
containing is
Materials
equimolar
present
a-haloketones
which
(Hamilton,
that
S-carboxyl
sequence residue
an
indicated
with
with
reported
by
In
reacts
was
No. 294 of the C. F. Sloan Research Fellow,
Kettering 1967-69.
489
Research
Laboratory.
same prepared
as
those by
crystalline 1-chloro-45,
addition extraction
of with
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
ether,
distillation
product H,
at 112-114’C/2
(analysis:
7.43)
talc.
melts
pected
The
described
(AcHPB)
anhydride.
evaporation
AcHPB
spectra H,
was
prepared
7.37:
The
by refluxing
was
for
H,
1944).
of the solvent,
(talc.
from
ether.
found;
The
C, 73.41;
nmr, and mass spectra are those exmethanol (1 max , 274 rnp, E, 19,300) of HPB
and Klingsberg,
(m. p. 43.5-44.5”(Z)
and analysis
the solid
identified
C12H1403;
ester,
l-acetoxy-4-
HPB
with
was
recrystallized
by its IR,
excess
nmr,
acetic from
and mass
C,
69. 88; H,
6. 84; found;
were
prepared
by reacting
C, 70.02;
6. 85). Large
swine
quantities
pepsin
an acetate
for
(0.05
radioactivity
at 4°C
-ca.
times
pepsin
Mann
M,
The
were
in the dialysate) by adding
the precipitated
material
85% alcohol,
of Cu(I1)
dialyzed versus
and dried
the acetate
labeled.
The
dissolves
with
Dansyl-Ile dansyl
amino
acids
obtained
Woods
labeled difficulty was
on a Phoenix Results
readily
were
after
were
purchased
from
no further
After
sitting
in vacua.
The
overall
-
washed
was
was labeled
88% of the pepsin
in solutions
14
over-
recovery
60% of the pepsin used,
at 38°C
and the C
by centrifugation,
amino
of Morse Pierce
of the peptides
by thin-layer
performed
automatic
buffer,
separated
dissolves
by the method
degradation
(1967)
M
was
of pH 6 or above
and
in pH 5 solution.
prepared
acids
and Wang analyses
pepsin
(until
of alcohol.
75%; when 5 x 10m4M DPB-2-C14 was used, 14 14 C , and when 10 x 10m4M DPB-2-C was
with
(1 x 10m4M)
exhaustively
10 volumes was
-4
Lot no. R3456) in -4 l4 (5 or 10x 10 M; specific
DPB-2-C
then
5 x 10
Laboratories,
in the presence
precipitated
with
Research
pH 5. 5) with
solutions
appeared
pepsin
several
-labeled
x IO8 dpm/mmole)
2 to 2. 5 hr.
night
14
(2x crystallized,
1.62
labeled
of C
buffer
activity,
acid
C, 73.15;
phenylhydrazone
phenylbutanone-2
ether.
and recrystallization
and its IR,
(McPhee
After
mm,
C10H1202;
at 44-45”C,
for HPB.
has been
for
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Chemical were
chromatography
by the method acid
and Horecker Co.
(1966).
Other
dansyl
amino
as described
by
The
identified
on polyamide
of Spackman,
sheets.
Stein,
Amino
and Moore
(1958)
analyzer.
and Discussion
At slightly released the reaction
from
basic
pH’s, a radioactive, 14 -labeled enzyme. the C
follows
first
This result -ca. 5 hours. attached at one specific
order suggests site.
ether-extractable
compound
In 0.05
M tris
kinetics
to over
80% completion
that
essentially
Preliminary
pH 8. 05, at 3O”C, and tl,2
all the radioactivity
chromatographic
490
buffer,
is rapidly
experiments
is is sug-
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
gested
that
the ether-extractable
shown
in Table
1 verify
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
radioactive
this
conclusion.
Equivalence
of HPB
is HPB.
prepared
and the Radioactive
Compound
Released
Total Radioa_cgtivity (dpmx 10 )
-2 x 10 mmole (88%) pepsin
1.46
(2)
ether-extractable after hydrolysis
labeled
the
at pH 8
1620b
17.7 pepsin
(3)
phenylhydrazone plus 1.86
prepared from mmoles HPB
(4)
recrystallized (3)
phenylhydrazone
from
2.25
8.6
(5)
recrystallized (4)
phenylhydrazone
from
0.29
8.2
(6)
expectedC specific phenylhydrazone
activity
from
Specific Activity (dpm/mmole x 10 -“I
20.8
radioactivity of labeled
results
1
Descriptiona
(1)
The
The phenylhydrazone
Table The
compound
(2)
11.8
8.5
of the
9.4
a The labeled pepsin (1) was incubated in 45 ml 0. 05 M tris buffer, pH 8.05, for 48 hours at room temperature. The solution was extracted several times with ether, the organic layer was dried and evaporated, and the residue dissolved in ethanol. The ethanol solution after filtration was counted (2). To the ethanol solution was added 1.86 mmoles unlabeled HPB, and the phenylhydrazone of HPB was prepared by adding phenylhydrazine and a few drops of 1 N HCl. The solid phenylhydrazone (3) was recrystallized twice from ethanol to give (4) and (5). b Specific activity of the DPB-2-C l4 used to prepared the labeled pepsin. c Calculated from the specific activity of the DPB-2-C14, the known amount of unlabeled HPB added, and the total radioactivity in (2) assuming it is all due to labeled HPB.
radioactive
compound
repeated
is only
extractable The
Since
slightly
radioactive rate
(AcHPB), stinilar
8.5
higher compound
of hydrolysis
was
hydrolysis range
unlabeled
recrystallizations.
hydrazone
rate
plus
to 9.6,
was
at 3O”C,
than
that
not change
must
specific
observed,
its
specific
activity very
nearly
activity
on
of the phenylall
of the ether-
be HPB. compound,
to see if simple
observed
of AcHPB
does
the expected
of the model
investigated to that
HPB
for
release
followed
using
esters of HPB
of HPB from
a Radiometer
in 5% dioxane-water,
491
I-acetoxy-4-phenylbutanone-2 would
the labeled pH stat.
the second
order
hydrolyze pepsin. Over
at a The
the pH
rate
constant
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
for
the base
catalyzed for
PH 8, $2
for
of AcHPB
the release
structure
group
For
of AcHPB
the hydrolysis
observed *e tl/2 that a reasonable carboxyl
hydrolysis
for
of labeled
digested
with
native
pepsin
(60% labeled)
was
dissolved
a slightly
(0. 1 M,
turbid
was
pepsin
essentially
all
brought
to pH 2.02,
went
of pepsin
solution
of 21 hr.
The
was
digest
5.0 to neutralize
was
283-292
G-15
a C
paper
(69,
electrophoresis
a
a single -labeled
regions
labeled
tetrapeptide,
was
in 0.2
(b) paper
in 8% formic
1959).
(Figure
(a)-(c)
respectively)
of the chromatograms.
The after
69 hr.
492
buffer,
acid.
1). The
in the original
and lyophilized
stage
by performing
Gel of From in succession
acid-water,
5 hours
hydrolysis
flat
at 40 watts/cm;
acid-water,
of purification
acid
200:30:75,
on a Savant
of radioactivity amino
of
digest.
780/O recovery.
electrophoresis
was
recovery
to dryness.
with
for
pH
After
on a 0.9 x 157 cm column
acid
ml
a total
the digest
in pyridine-acetic
At each
2.35 for
M acetic
precipitate,
isolated
was
(pH 2. 95) was
in l-butanol-acetic
at pH 3.6
determined
to continue
solution,
acid
In a few
an additional
ml of 1. 0 M acetate
bf white
solution
the solution
0.2
of radioactivity
1966);
apparatus
when
in
of the
ml of a pepsin
hours,
suspended
tetrapeptide
Digestion
allowed
pooled
buffer
by adding
was
present
and Anfinsen,
narrow
4.3
90% of that
chromatography
91% in steps
After
G-25
peak
temperature
ml in 0. 01 M HCl).
resulting
M acetic
2.35
of inhibited
0.3 ml tris
M HCl.
had formed
amount
I) were
electrophoresis
Dreyer, 96, and
with
pH 7. 2) to
to 2.02
which
with
The
per
of sephadex
in 0.2
and Margoliash,
and (c) paper (Katz,
14
was (peak
Sephadex
plate
HCl.
a small
222-355
of the residue
(Nolan
treated
on a column
gave
pepsin
and the residue
filtration
v/v
then
to remove
(a) descending
to
C 14-labeled
at room
adjusted
by adding
and digestion
the excess
chromatographed c14 .m fractions
initiated
solution,
added
to dryness
material
of HPB
(0. 05 M,
standing
and 0. 1 ml of 1.0
the precipitate, into
After
the pH was
M HCl was
buffer
to pH 7. 8 by adding
Worthington
minutes
this
at
and indicates
A 133 mg sample
in 2. 5 ml tris
10 min,
at 37°C
(5 mg of 2x crystallized
Fractions
enzyme
denatured
as follows.
brought
-ca. ml of 0.02
16.5
centrifugation
. Thus,
is comparable
is an ester
fragments,
of pH 6.0.
pH 8. 5). After
lyophilized
the labeled
pepsin
peptide pepsin
solution
the solution
succession 14 C -labeled
from
This
-1
set
of pepsin.
the preparation
30 min,
is 2 to 3 hours.
the labeled
was
for
-1
is 56-+ 7 1 -mole
of HPB
pepsin
yield
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1:10:289 good
was
composition
recovery
obtained of the
in constant-boiling
in
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
1.6
-
1.4
-
.6 $ z .4 I 8 .2 2 4
FRACTION
NUMBER
Figure 1. Gel filtration at room temperature of the pepsin digest of denatured, Cl*-labeled pepsin. The 1.9 x 243 cm column, which was packed with Sephadex G-25 (fine bead form) in 0.2 M acetic acid (Eaker, 1962)) had a void volume of 27 5 ml. The digest sample volume was 3.7 ml and the eluant was 0.2 M acetic acid. Two-ml fractions were collected at a flow rate of 28. 5 ml/hr. The ninhydrin color (absorbancy at 570 ml) of base-hydrolyzed 0.05 nil aliquots of each fraction was determined by the method of Rosen (1957).
HCl
at llO”C,
acids
were
peptide
is: present
group
of the Asp
the aqueous
under
comparable
amino
N-terminal
amino 1967).
dation. into
with
acid
Most
the organic
compound because
at 37”C, ether.
with
labeled
of this
liberated
at each
solution
is 1.0.
result
and free
stage
is similar
shown
is incubated
way as to pepsin.
and identifying
2 steps
493
does
to be Ile-Val-Asp-Thr
the first
the
technique
the labeled
the radioactivity found
the f3-
obtained 14 that the C -
by the dansylation
was
tetra-
to that
and suggests
with
threonine
amino
can be extracted
associated
step,
Also,
tetrapeptide
in the same was
Other
tetrapeptide
procedure,
during
the third
0.95.
In the labeled
the labeled
pepsin,
peptide
of the radioactivity
solvent,
of Asp. to Asp
to the tetrapeptide
degradation
following
Val,
the radioactivity
This
Edman
in the aqueous However,
4 hr.
sequence
the subtractive
0.89;
at pH 6. 5. If the labeled
is attached
acid
Thr,
5% of the amount
is not free
conditions
compound
0.95;
of radioactive
solution
by using
remained
than
pH 8. 5, for
from
(Gray,
Ile,
on electrophoresis
buffer,
The
to less ratio
not migrate
labeled
(1.00);
the molar
carboxyl
in tris
Asp,
peptide
of the Edman was
degra-
extracted
in the aqueous
layer.
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
These
results
carboxyl
group
The with
indicate
two
of the
similar acid
II indicate
it
liminary
in
materials results
II
the
will
be
further
and
III
a labeled
(Figure
for
is
attached
to
of an
sequence
peak
Ile-Val-Asp.
necessary
to that
the
p-
III
of
purified
of the
labeled of
Val,
indicate work
these
a single
by
Asp,
from
and
that
it
with
larger
pro-
tetrapeptide.
material
conclusions.
aspartyl
associated
and
sample
Further
substantiate
only
impure
composed
from
to be
separated
purification
tripeptide
material
1) appears
been
the
analysis
suggest
compound
have
employed
on
with
-labeled
which
radioactivity
contains
14
residue.
peaks
those
experiments
tripeptide
C
peptides
to
and
the
aspartyl
radioactivity 14 C -labeled
cedures Amino
that
Thr.
contains
Prea labeled
amounts
However,
residue
on
peak
pepsin
of these
reacts
with
DPB. All
of the
reacts
with
specific will
be
in
will
the
also
be
of
ester
which
is
catalysis, not
interest
present
same
see
if
Stein 1967;
or
in Moore,
to
different
are
consistent
of HPB in
the
whether
(Dopheide,
Perlmann,
at the
an
determine
(Rajagopalan,
and
occur
is
here
form
ensymic
pepsin
compounds Ong
to
tetrapeptide of
to residue
necessary
section
reported
pepsin
aspartyl
involved This
results
the and
Erlanger,
with
with
the
sequence this
in
the
known
sequence
observed
Vratsanos,
that
group
of
the
1967;
of
this the
Delpierre
Wassermann,
one work
intimately sequence
carboxyl
Stepanov
reactions
1966;
is
enzyme
DPB
Further
residue
where
Moore,
(3-carboxyl
aspartyl
Stein,
hypothesis
Ile-Val-Asp-Thr.
and
and
the
occurs. terminal
et al,
1967).
of pepsin
with
other
and
Fruton, and
It diazo
1966;
Cooper,
1967)
sites.
Acknowledgements We are indebted to Mr. David Rifenberick excellent technical assistance. This research grant GM-14985 from the Institute of General Service.
and Mr. Eugene Loewer was partially supported Medical Sciences, Public
for by research Health
References Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S. 2_6,1817. Delpierre, G. R., and Fruton, ? S. (1966) ind Stein, W.H. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. ,=,1833. Dopheide, T. A .p. I Moore, S., The Rockefeller Institute, p. 29. Eaker, D. L. (1962) Ph.D. Dissertation, Erlanger, B. F., Vratsanos, S. M., Wassermann, N. and Cooper, A.G. (1966) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 23, 243. Erlanger, B.F., Vratsanos, S.M., Wassermann, N. and Cooper, A.G. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 28, 203. Gray, W.R. (1967) Methods in Enzymology, 11, 469.
Vol. 30, No. 5, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Hamilton, G. A. , Spona, J. and Crowell, L.D. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 193. Katz, A.M., Dreyer, W. J., and Anfinsen, C.B. (1959) J. Biol. Chem., =,2897 E. (1944) J. Am. Chem. Sot., 66, 1132. McPhee, W. D. and Klingsberg, Morse, D. andHorecker, B.L. (1966) Anal. Biochem., l& 429. Nolan, C. and Margoliash, E. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 1049. Ong, E. B. and Perlmann, G. E. (1967) Nature, 215, 1492. W.H. and Moore, S.566) J. Biol. Chem., 3, 4295. Rajagopalan, T. G., Stein, Rosen, H. (1957) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 67, 10. Spackman, D. H. , Stein, W.H. and Moore, S. (1958) Anal. Chem., 30, 1190. Stepanov, V. M., Ostoslavskaya, V.I., Krivtzov, V. F., Muratova, G. L. and Levin, E.D. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 140, 182. Woods, K. R. and Wang, K. T. (1967) Biochem. BGhys. Acta, 2, 369.
496