Accepted Manuscript A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Li Ma, Scott R. Yates PII:
S0165-9936(18)30469-2
DOI:
10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.007
Reference:
TRAC 15271
To appear in:
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Received Date: 9 September 2018 Revised Date:
4 October 2018
Accepted Date: 6 October 2018
Please cite this article as: L. Ma, S.R. Yates, A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.007. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental
RI PT
steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
a
SC
Li Maa,b* and Scott R. Yatesb
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United
b
M AN U
States
Contaminant Fate and Transport Unit, Salinity Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States
TE D
Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California 92507, United States
AC C
EP
* To whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail:
[email protected]
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Abstract This review covers liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) strategies for
3
structural elucidation of degradation and transformation products of environmental steroid
4
hormones due to their estrogenic and/or androgenic effects on environmental living life. We
5
focus on identification fundamentals of unknown metabolites rather than on target analysis. We
6
discuss LC-MS capacities and overall MS-based steps for structural elucidation of unknown
7
metabolites. Also summarized in the review are the fragmentation reactions and fragmentation
8
pathways of protonated and deprotonated molecules of unknown compounds. We pay particular
9
attention to versatile orthogonal techniques (e.g., isotopic labeling, hydrogen/deuterium
10
exchange and model compound utilization) associated with MS and intelligent spectral
11
interpretation strategies used in literature for structural elucidation of steroid hormone
12
metabolites. We provide up-to-date applications of LC-MS on structural elucidation of biotic and
13
abiotic transformation products of steroid hormones in environmental samples. Most of what is
14
discussed in this review also applies to other emerging environmental contaminants.
SC
M AN U
TE D
technique; degradation and transformation product; environmental steroid hormone
EP
16
Keywords: Structural elucidation; liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; orthogonal
AC C
15
RI PT
2
2
Abbreviations
18
APCI, Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization
19
API, Atmospheric-pressure ionization
20
APPI, Atmospheric-pressure photoionization
21
CID, Collision-induced dissociation
22
DFT, Density functional theory
23
EI, Electron ionization
24
ESI, Electrospray ionization
25
E1, Estrone
26
E2, 17ß-Estradiol
27
EE2, 17α-Ethynylestradiol
28
FED, Frontier electron density
29
FT-ICR, Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance
30
GC-MS, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
31
HCD, Higher-energy collision-induced dissociation
32
H/D, Hydrogen/deuterium
33
HRAM, High-resolution accurate-mass
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
17
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
IT-MS, Ion-trap mass spectrometry
35
LTQ, Linear trap quadrupole
36
LC-MS, Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
37
MS, Mass spectrometry
38
MRM, Multiple reaction monitoring
39
MSn, Multistage fragmentation
40
NLS, Neutral-loss scan
41
NMR, Nuclear magnetic resonance
42
PIS, Precursor-ion scan
43
Q-TOF, Quadrupole time-of-flight
44
RDB, Ring double-bond equivalent
45
TQ, Triple-quadrupole
46
TOF, Time-of-flight
47
WWTPs, Wastewater treatment plants
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
34
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
48 49
1. Introduction Endocrine disrupting steroid hormones, including for example sex steroid hormones (majorly estrogens, androgens and progestagens) and anabolic steroids, are among the most widely
51
investigated environmental pollutants during the past few decades associated with their adverse
52
effects on aquatic organisms (e.g., feminization, decreased fertility and intersexuality)[1-3].
53
Exogenous natural and synthetic steroid hormones (i.e., not self-produced) were generally
54
reported to exhibit the highest affinities for binding to hormone receptors and thus the highest
55
disrupting potencies [4, 5]. These hormones are administrated to human and livestock for
56
medication purpose and are subsequently excreted through defecation and urination, primarily in
57
biologically-inert conjugated form, partially in biologically-active free forms, and then reach the
58
wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [6]. Part of the contaminants pass WWTPs unaltered,
59
leading to their omnipresence in surface water. Steroid hormones have a common parent sterane
60
backbone which features four fused rings, namely three cyclohexane rings (assigned as A-, B-,
61
and C-rings) and one cyclopentane ring (the D-ring). The skeleton and structures of common
62
steroid hormones investigated in the environment are shown in Figure 1.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
50
Ever since concern was raised on endocrine disruptors, numerous degradation approaches,
64
biotic and abiotic, have been conducted with the purpose to remove the contaminants from the
65
environmental compartments. In this regard, most of existing studies tackled parent compounds,
66
while relatively less information on their metabolites and transformation products has been
67
documented. This is, at least partially, due to the identification challenges. A subtle change in the
68
molecular structure of the parent compounds during the degradation and transformation process
69
would lead to changes in their potential for steroid receptor binding and thus subsequent
70
biological activities. For example, previous studies demonstrated that the phenolic A ring of
AC C
EP
63
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
estrogens was responsible for their estrogenicity [7], while modification of estrogens via
72
aromatic ring hydroxylation and cleavage can reduce their estrogenicity by a factor of 200–500
73
[8]. Nevertheless, some hydroxylated estrogens were reported to incur carcinogenesis [9, 10]. In
74
a phototransformation study on anabolic steroids, albeit the near complete phototransformation
75
of parents, biological activity of photoproduct mixtures retained, suggesting the possible
76
formation of more biologically-active and environmentally-persistent photoproducts [11].
77
Therefore, characterization of novel biodegradation and transformation products is of uttermost
78
importance for policy makers to conduct ecological risk assessment and strategy planning.
SC
From an identification point of view, compounds to be identified can be classified into three
M AN U
79
RI PT
71
classes: “known knowns”, “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” [12]. A “known
81
known” refers to a compound expected to be present in certain samples whose structure is well
82
known and its presence need to be confirmed. An identification of “known knowns” is better
83
described as an act of identity confirmation rather than identification. For example,
84
environmental analysis is mostly directed at searching for the presence of target compounds
85
which are known to the investigator and quantifying them if confirmed. For relatively polar
86
compounds like steroid hormones, this task can be best fulfilled using liquid chromatography
87
tandem-mass spectrometry based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by referring to
88
commercial standards. So far, such target-based environmental monitoring has been extensively
89
conducted, exemplified by studies on occurrence and laboratory based microcosm studies on
90
degradation kinetics of parent compounds [6, 13-16]. A “known unknown” represents a
91
compound that is unknown to the investigator but can be found in the literature or compound
92
databases. Finally, an “unknown unknown” is a compound that is not described elsewhere [12].
93
The identification of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” entails an access of more
AC C
EP
TE D
80
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
advanced instrument, versatile mass spectral libraries or databases as well as in-depth
95
interpretation of mass spectra. Generally, biotic and abiotic metabolites and transformation
96
products of the parent compounds in the environment fall in between the second and third
97
categories. Therefore, only “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” are taken into account
98
in the current review.
99
RI PT
94
There are two reviews published ten years ago discussing the structural elucidation of
metabolites of environmental contaminants by hyphenated MS techniques with one focusing on
101
pharmaceuticals and the other on phenols [17, 18]. A few recent reviews reported the advances
102
of MS in identification of transformation products of emerging environmental contaminants [19-
103
24]. However, the dissociation mechanisms of ionized molecules based on collision-induced
104
dissociation (CID) and identification strategies of yet-to be identified compounds based on, for
105
example, orthogonal techniques (e.g., isotopic labeling, derivatization, hydrogen/deuterium
106
exchange and model compound utilization), were inadequately addressed in these reviews.
107
Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize up-to-date progress in MS techniques in
108
structural elucidation of biotic and abiotic metabolites and transformation products of steroid
109
hormones in the environment. Information on fragmentation pathways of reference steroid
110
hormones was also generalized.
111
2. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) capabilities
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
100
112
It is well known that gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) equipped with an
113
electron ionization (EI) source is a popular tool in structural elucidation of unknown compounds
114
ever since its invention [25]. However, since GC-MS is applicable for volatile and thermostable
115
compounds, determination of polar and thermo-labile compounds largely relies on LC-MS.
116
Atmospheric-pressure ionization (API) is soft ionization technique used in LC-MS [26]. Three
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
kinds of API are routinely used: electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric-pressure chemical
118
ionization (APCI) and atmospheric-pressure photoionization (APPI), among which, ESI,
119
followed by APCI, is the most widely used technique in LC-MS [26] and is fairly suitable for
120
steroid hormones. Table 1 provides a quick view of the applicability of ESI and APCI in
121
identification of degradation and transformation products of steroid hormones in the environment
122
based on laboratory studies. Unlike the hard ionization technique EI under which a molecular ion
123
is dissociated into multiple fragments, ESI/APCI mostly yields intact protonated/deprotonated
124
molecules [26], which help identify the molecular mass of the analyte.
SC
RI PT
117
In essence, ionization of a molecule in ESI obeys the acid-base theory. In positive ESI,
126
molecules are protonated majorly to form [M+H]+ with m/z (M+1); while in negative ESI,
127
deprotonation ions [M–H]– with m/z (M–1) are readily generated. In addition, formation of other
128
adducts such as [M+Na]+, [M+K]+ and [M+NH4]+ in the positive mode and [M+Cl] – and
129
[M+CH3COO] – in the negative mode, for example, could also occur which can be employed to
130
pinpoint the molecular identity. In APCI, protonated and deprotonated molecules are also
131
commonly observed. Information concerning the ionization mechanisms of ESI/APCI was
132
described elsewhere [26, 27]. In the current review, only protonated and deprotonated molecules
133
in ESI/APCI are discussed, while other ionization techniques or multiply-charged ions are
134
beyond the scope of this review.
TE D
EP
AC C
135
M AN U
125
Among the common mass analyzers used so far, quadrupole and ion-trap mass spectrometers
136
(IT-MS) provide unit-mass resolution and a mass accuracy of ±0.1 for mono-charged ions over
137
the entire applicable m/z range; while high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) mass
138
spectrometers, represented by time-of-flight (TOF), orbitrap and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron
139
resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometers, feature a mass error even less than 1ppm and a
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
resolution in excess of 105 (based on full peak width at half maximum height definition) for low-
141
molecular-weight analytes [26]. Therefore, with the aid of HRAM-MS, the exact mass of both
142
precursor and product ions is measured which enables determination of an elemental
143
composition (or molecular formula). Information including advantages, disadvantages, mass
144
accuracy and mass resolution power of different analyzers were included in other reviews [18,
145
28]. Protonated or deprotonated molecules in ion source are usually selected as precursors for
146
CID in tandem MS. CID refers to the process whereby a precursor ion, via collision with a
147
neutral gas, is activated and then fragmented to form a population of product ions [29]. CID can
148
occur in a collision cell of quadruple or in ion trap at low collision energy. Low-energy CID,
149
together with higher-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) which occurs in a HCD cell of
150
an Orbitrap machine, is so far the most frequently used mass spectrometry dissociation technique
151
for the analysis of small molecules [30]. A wealth of structural information is provided thereof.
152
Based on the abovementioned capabilities of certain analyzers in elemental composition
153
assignment and its CID function, LC-ESI/APCI-MS proved itself an indispensable tool in
154
environmental analytical chemistry.
155
3. Fragmentation pathways of [M+H]+ and [M–H]–
156
3.1 Fragmentation reactions
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
140
Different from EI for which an odd-electron molecular ion is generated via loss of an
158
electron, ESI/APCI generally yields even-electron molecular ions with mostly the addition or
159
subtraction of a hydrogen ion ([M+H]+ and [M–H]–). Fragmentation of [M+H]+ and [M–H]–
160
generally obeys the even-electron rule: an even-electron is apt to form an even-electron fragment
161
ion via a neutral loss rather than form an odd-electron fragment ion via a loss of a radical.
162
Violation of the rule may also occur in some circumstances. For instance, a loss of an alkyl
AC C
157
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
radical group from a protonated or deprotonated molecule is observable for steroids [31]. Prior to
164
the proposal of the fragmentation pathways, it is essential to know typical fragmentation
165
reactions subjected to CID-MS. Studies concerning steroid hormones in this regard are relatively
166
less addressed. Yet, by analogy to a recent review [32], fragmentation reactions of protonated or
167
deprotonated steroids in available literature are classified into two major categories: charge-
168
remote fragmentation and charge-induced fragmentation. Charge-remote fragmentation is
169
characterized by charge retention in the original place with bond cleaved at a site physically
170
remote from the site of the charge [33-35]. Conversely, charge-induced fragmentation is a
171
fragmentation reaction in which the cleavage occurs adjacent to the apparent charge site,
172
resulting in charge migration to a new site. Examples of two reactions are portrayed in Figure 2.
173
It is showed that charge-remote fragmentation reactions of deprotonated ions are similar to those
174
of protonated ions because they take place in sites remote from the charge site. However, charge-
175
induced fragmentation reactions are distinct between protonated and deprotonated ions with
176
adjacent electrons transferred towards and away from the charge site, respectively.
177
3.2 Fragmentation pathway proposal
SC
M AN U
TE D
The proposal of fragmentation pathways of a specific compound depends not only on
EP
178
RI PT
163
knowledge of fragmentation reactions but also other valuable approaches. Particularly, the use of
180
HRAM-MS enables the calculation of the molecular formulae of both precursor and product ions.
181
Afterwards, the nitrogen rule can be applied to and the ring double-bond equivalent (RDB) value
182
can be calculated from the molecular formula. A positive mono-charged ion has a RDB value
183
ending in +0.5 and a negative mono-charge ion has a RDB value ending in –0.5. A molecule
184
losing an electron has an integer value. Besides, stable-isotope labeling, multistage fragmentation
185
(MSn) and certain software are also very much helpful. Noteworthy is that the concept of ion
AC C
179
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
stability was attenuated in a number of studies to propose the structure of the product ions. Guan
187
et al. [31] elucidated the fragmentation pathways of protonated anabolic steroids (e.g., boldenone,
188
trenbolone, testosterone and so on) with the aid of Mass Frontier software, accurate mass
189
measurement and MSn. The results suggested firstly that charge-induced cleavage was the most
190
important fragmentation process. Secondly, charge-induced cleavage most likely occurred at a
191
carbon atom with the most braches or strains. Thirdly, formation of priority product ions was
192
pertinent to the stability of the product ions. A product on with the charge stabilized by
193
resonance for instance has high stability. In a study to propose the fragmentation pathway of
194
protonated estrone (E1), Bourcier et al. [36] compared the CID spectra of two marker
195
compounds, namely estrone methyl ether and E1-D4 (deuterium labeled at C2, C4 and C16),
196
with that of E1 to deduce the chemical structure of product ions. The use of deuterated E1
197
implied methyl rearrangement the primary step to initial fragmentation of protonated E1. Sun et
198
al. [37] studied thoroughly the product ions of [M–H]– of estrogens and their analogs and
199
summarized that the most abundant fragment ions were consistent with the fragmentation
200
pathway of retrocyclization. The overall rule is that these product ions which formed due to the
201
elimination of small neutral molecules (e.g., H2, CH4, H2O, CO and CH3OH) and/or ring
202
cleavage are stabilized by conjugated double bonds and an aromatic ring. As illustrated in Figure
203
3, the presence of a double bond in equilin and 17ß-equilin facilitated a H2 loss, leading to the
204
aromatization of ring B, and a C17 carbonyl group in equilin favors a CH4 loss, leading to the
205
conjugation of a C13-14 double bond with the ketone carbonyl group. Conversely, such
206
mechanisms were void in 17ß-estradiol (E2). Similar rules were iterated by Tedmon et al. [38],
207
in defining the fragmentation differences between standard isobaric steroid hormones. Notably,
208
density functional theory (DFT) calculation was employed in this study to predict fragmentation
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
186
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
events based on the calculated lowest energy configurations of product ions and the predicted
210
results generally matched what was observed in CID spectra [38]. DFT together with frontier
211
electron density (FED) are common electronic theory used to predict metabolite formation of
212
estrogens in the environment [39]. Elsewhere, a few more studies [40-42] investigated the CID
213
spectra of a series of standard steroids and correlated the diagnostic fragmentation pattern with
214
their structural feature, which holds promise guiding the structural elucidation of their
215
metabolites.
216
4. Overview of structural elucidation steps and strategies
SC
Although specific structural elucidation steps may be case dependent due to variations in
M AN U
217
RI PT
209
instrumentation and the experimental conditions, the overall steps include: 1) full scan to show
219
peaks of potential metabolites and their protonated/deprotonated molecules ([M+H]+ and [M–H]–
220
); 2) acquisition of product-ion spectra of [M+H]+ and [M–H]– based on CID; 3) molecular
221
formula assignment of [M+H]+ and [M–H]– and product ions if applicable; and 4) structural
222
elucidation based on product-ion spectral interpretation and authentic standard confirmation if
223
available. Overall workflow of elucidation is schemed in Figure 4.
TE D
218
Generally, real samples and controls were firstly scanned in positive and negative mode
225
across an appropriate m/z range. Peaks present in treated samples but absent in controls are
226
regarded as prospective peaks of the unknown metabolites. The selection of potential peaks of
227
interest may rely on either preliminary visual interpretation of relevant chromatograms or data
228
processing software such as XCMS [43]. Appropriate screening criteria including for example
229
peak area threshold were implemented to prioritize the list of potential peaks of interest. Ion
230
adducts and/or dimers/trimers were used to identify the most likely protonated/deprotonated
231
molecules.
AC C
EP
224
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
232
Molecular formulae of the protonated/deprotonated molecules were assessed based on accurate mass measurement on HRAM-MS. Several calculation criteria were applied to narrow
234
the number of possible molecular formulae, including an accuracy error threshold, upper limits
235
on the number of carbon/hydrogen/nitrogen, the nitrogen rule, isotope pattern and RDB, until
236
one molecular formula is derived. Thereafter, an option to mine the chemical structure of the
237
unknown compound is to search its molecular formula against known chemical structure
238
databases such as PubChem, Chemspider, and SciFinder [44]. Although each database is
239
incomplete, valuable information can still be drawn for ease of structural illustration. Otherwise,
240
the structure can be disclosed based on the following approaches.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
233
Protonated/deprotonated molecules of the unknown metabolites are subject to MSn
242
(multistage fragmentation of the protonated/deprotonated molecules to acquire product-ion
243
spectrum), if necessary, based on CID for further structural information. The structure of the
244
metabolites can be proposed based on product-ion spectral interpretation. One common and easy
245
approach to product-ion spectral interpretation is by referring to the product-ion mass
246
spectrometry data of existing literature and spectral libraries such as MassBank, METLIN, NIST
247
and Wiley or by comparison with fragmentation patterns of commercial standards, if available.
248
Besides, knowledge of CID fragmentation reactions (Section 3.1) and use of fragmentation
249
pathway predicting software help the interpretation. Two widely used commercially available
250
software packages are Mass Frontier and Mass Fragmenter [44]. The formula assignment of the
251
product ions based on HRAM-MS also greatly facilitates the structural elucidation. Another way
252
that helps structural elucidation is via comparison of protonated/deprotonated molecules of the
253
metabolites with that of a related parent compound itself. This strategy derives from the premise
254
that the initial metabolites conserve to some degree the basic skeleton of its parent compound.
AC C
EP
TE D
241
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
255
Mass shift between them implies certain transformation reactions. For instance, a +16 (Da) shift
256
in m/z value may indicate hydroxylation, +14 (Da) methylation, –2 (Da) dehydrogenation, +2
257
(Da) saturation, +18 (Da) hydration and –18 (Da) dehydration, etc. Notably, when routine MS analysis alone do not suffice to unravel the identity of an
RI PT
258
unknown compound, orthogonal techniques that can be readily performed on MS are employed
260
to facilitate structural elucidation. Therein, 2H or 13C isotopic labeling is a sagacious strategy
261
adopted. The location of modifications during the degradation and/or transformation process
262
could be inferred via comparison of the spectra between non-labeled and labeled parent
263
compounds. Hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange is another example. Hydrogen atoms attached
264
to heteroatoms (e.g., N, O and S) are easily exchanged by deuterium. Therefore, in a H/D
265
exchange event, investigators measured the m/z shift between a unknown metabolite and its
266
H/D-exchange counterpart to judge the presence of hydroxy (–OH), carboxylic acid (–COOH)
267
and amino (–NH2) functional groups in the metabolite structure. Other orthogonal techniques
268
such as derivatization and using model compounds are also feasible. Examples to illustrate the
269
structures of the degradation and transformation products are elaborated in the following part.
270
5. Applications in environmental samples
271
5.1 Triple-quadrupole MS (TQ-MS)
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
259
TQ features three quadrupoles where the first and third quadrupoles permit mass analysis and
273
the second allows CID. Generally, TQ is not an ideal tool for structural illustration due to its low
274
sensitively, low-mass resolution and accuracy in the scan mode whereby the molecular formulae
275
of the unknowns cannot be determined; rather, TQ is applied more for quantitative analysis in the
276
MRM mode which features high sensitivity. Nevertheless, due to the unavailability of more
277
powerful instrument under certain circumstances, TQ was still availed in a few studies to
AC C
272
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
tentatively identify the degradation and transformation products of progestagens and estrogens in
279
the environmental matrix [8, 45-49](Table 1). Full scan and product ion scan with TQ were
280
conducted in these studies to obtain the protonated or deprotonated molecules of the metabolites
281
and their fragmental information. The structures of the metabolites were tentatively proposed by
282
means of personal interpretation of the spectra and referring to literature and further confirmed
283
using authentic standards if available. The unequivocal structural elucidation, however, was
284
challenging without standards or other confirmation method. One thing to be notified is that to
285
manifest minor metabolites on full scan spectra which would be otherwise invisible if the
286
concentration of parent compound is low arising from the low sensitivity of TQ in scan mode,
287
parent compounds were usually fortified at much higher concentrations than environmentally-
288
relevant concentrations. In this case, the similarity in transformation pathways of parents cannot
289
be guaranteed for spiked concentrations with environmentally-relevant concentrations.
SC
M AN U
Apart from full scan and product ion scan, precursor-ion scan (PIS) and neutral-loss scan
TE D
290
RI PT
278
(NLS) [50] with TQ also help structural elucidation. PIS mode is used to look for the precursors
292
of a particular fragment ion. For example, Zhou et al. [51] applied PIS approach to search for
293
halogen-containing estrogens with halide ions as fragments. NLS is used to monitor an ion which
294
upon CID has a neutral loss with a mass matching the fixed m/z difference. NLS is especially
295
useful for screening metabolites of sulfate- and glucuronide-conjugated steroids which feature
296
common neutral losses of 80 (SO3) and 176 Da (C6H8O). These conjugates can also be screened
297
in PIS mode by the scan over all precursors that give rise to fragment ions at m/z 80 (SO3 –) and
298
m/z 97 (HSO4–) or m/z 175 (glucuronate) and m/z 113 (fragment of the glucuronide moiety) [18,
299
52]. However, PIS and NLS are mostly used for identification of new steroid metabolites [53] in
300
biological matrix but are rarely applied in environmental samples.
AC C
EP
291
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
301
With TQ, orthogonal techniques and other intelligent strategies were adopted to assist the identification. For example, Huber et al. [8] extrapolated the O3 oxidized products of 17α-
303
ethynylestradiol (EE2) by referring to two model compounds 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthol and
304
1-ethinyl-1-cyclohexanol, which represent, respectively, the reactive phenolic moiety and the
305
ethinyl group of EE2. The derived oxidation products of EE2 were identified using TQ, and the
306
characteristic neutral losses of deprotonated molecules ([M-H]–) of the oxidation products also
307
supported the putative structures. For example, loss of 44 (CO2), 46 (CH2O2) and 62 (CO2 + H2O)
308
likely suggested the presence of one carboxylic acid, α/ß-hydroxy acid and two carboxylic acid
309
functional groups in the structure, respectively [54, 55]. Elsewhere, Ma and Yates [49] employed
310
“pseudo-MS3” to tentatively identify the biodegradation products of 17ß-estradiol-3- glucuronide
311
and 17ß-estradiol-3-sulfate in riverine sediment. To apply “pseudo-MS3”, an increased de-
312
clustering voltage in ESI source was applied to produce in-source fragmentation of the
313
deprotonated molecules. One characteristic fragment with high response was selected for further
314
fragmentation in a collision cell of TQ. Tentatively proposed metabolites in the study included
315
hydroxylated products, keto derivatives and dehydrogenated products, among which several
316
products were confirmed using authentic standards and GC-MS after derivatization. In another
317
study on ligninase-mediated E2 removal [48], E2 lost one electron to generate an E2 free radical
318
which self-combined via coupling reactions to form dimers and trimers. Reaction sites in E2
319
molecules were proposed based on the computed charge and spin densities of the free radical.
320
5.2 IT-MS
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
321
RI PT
302
Similar to TQ-MS, drawbacks of IT-MS arising from low-mass accuracy and resolution do
322
not allow a molecular formula calculation. Yet the high full-scan sensitivity and MSn capabilities
323
render IT-MS a promising technique in structural elucidation of the degradation and
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
transformation products of environmental contaminants. The high full-scan sensitivity trait of IT-
325
MS may make avoidable the cumbersome steps to concentrate the analytes. In a MSn experiment,
326
selection of precursor ions, CID and product-ion scan are all performed in ion-trap, whereby a
327
high abundance of structurally-informative product ions are yielded. Intelligent identification
328
strategies, orthogonal information and electronic theory were also used in some studies to verify
329
the metabolite structures proposed based on MSn. For example, in a photodegradation study of
330
EE2 [56], the structures of the intermediates were determined via comparison of obtained MS4
331
data with prior knowledge of EE2 photocatalytic mechanisms. The hydroxylated products were
332
proposed to be the initial metabolites, arising from ˙OH attack of EE2; whereas the reaction site,
333
namely the location of the hydroxyl group, was predicted based on FED calculation. In another
334
example with characterization of an EE2 biotransformation product, MSn data suggested the
335
presence of a hydroxyl group, an aldehyde group, and a carboxylic group in the structure [57].
336
This product derivatized with dansyl chloride in the same manner as EE2 (reaction site is located
337
at phenol group), in support of the preservation of the phenolic group of the parent EE2 after
338
transformation. Furthermore, the early elution of the product on reversed-phase LC
339
chromatograph suggested the presence of a polar group such as a carboxylic moiety. Such
340
polarity oriented judgement was also stated in other studies [11, 58].
341
5.3 TOF-MS and Q-TOF-MS
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
342
RI PT
324
High full-scan sensitivity, high-mass resolution and accuracy provided by TOF-MS make it a
343
significant asset for molecular formula definition of analytes. Single TOF-MS has been proved
344
useful for structural disclosure for oligomers or polymers, which are common transformation
345
products of estrogens in enzyme-mediated systems [59, 60]. Nonetheless, since TOF-MS alone is
346
not able to provide CID, NLS and PIS, additional structural illustration strategies and analytical
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
tools are needed for further confirmation. For example, to determine the structure of EE2
348
metabolites by an advanced catalytic oxidation process [61], the molecular formulae of the
349
oxidized metabolites were assigned by TOF-MS, confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance
350
(NMR) and verified by FED calculation.
RI PT
347
During the past few years, a Q-TOF hybrid increasingly becomes a universal tool in
352
environmental analysis. The so-called hybrid instrument usually means that the two different
353
analyzers are tandem in space. Q-TOF can be regarded as a modified TQ with the third
354
quadrupole replaced by TOF analyzer. Each analyzer alone has disadvantages, while a hybrid-
355
mass system is able to integrate the merits of the two. Q-TOF hybrid mass spectrometer inherits
356
acquisition modes from TQ except MRM, allowing a molecular formula calculated for not only
357
precursor ions but also product ions. Wang et al. [62] confirmed the formation of oligomers as
358
the major phototransformation products of estrogens in a Mn (Ⅲ)-mediated system based on
359
accurate mass measurement and CID spectral interpretation. Identified oligomers were formed
360
via self-coupling reaction of E2 or E1 and cross-coupling reaction of E2 and E1. The same
361
approaches were applied by Wang et al. [63] to evaluate the photodegradation products of E2 on
362
silica gel and natural soil; therein hydroxylated products and similar oligomers were identified.
363
In both studies, DFT calculations were carried out to provide theoretical insights into the
364
potential reaction sites of the substrates (e.g., hydroxylation, oligomerization, and C-C bond
365
cleavage). In a study to evaluate the photolysis by-products of E1by Q-TOF, Souissi et al. [64]
366
employed two model compounds, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphtol and 2-methylcy-clopentanone
367
which represent ring A/B and ring D of E1, respectively, to deduce the possible structure of E1
368
photolysis by-products. Based on CID mass spectra and accurate mass measurement, the by-
369
products were proposed to be hydroxylated products and dimers. Importantly, by measuring the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
351
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
mass shift of the protonated molecules and their fragmented product ions between E1and E1-D4
371
(labeled at C2, C4 and C16) photolysis by-products, the location of reaction site (e.g.,
372
hydroxylation and polymerization) was tentatively localized. In a denitrifying media incubated
373
with both testosterone and 2,3,4-13C-labeled testosterone (13C labeled at C-2, C-3 and C-4), a
374
13
375
suggested two 13C-labeled carbons from the parent were lost during the formation of this C17
376
intermediate. Eventually, the two lost 13C-labeled carbons were assumed to be C-3 and C-4 via
377
plausible deduction from the structure of one upstream intermediate. Table 1 listed a few more
378
studies on Q-TOF-aided metabolite identification in environmental samples.
379
5.4 Linear trap quadrupole (LTQ)-Orbitrap
SC
C-labeled intermediate with 17 carbons was identified [65]. TOF-MS accurate mass calculation
M AN U
380
RI PT
370
To perform a LTQ-Orbitrap analysis, the spectrometer was switched between Orbitrap-MS for high-resolution full scan data and LTQ-MS/MS for low-resolution fragmentation data (MSn).
382
With the former they are able to measure a molecular formula of the precursor and fragment ions
383
with high confidence while the later enables a structure tentatively proposed. Examples of LTQ-
384
Orbitrap application are also listed in Table 1. Hom-Diaz et al. [66] built an in-house library
385
based on the accurate mass of the transformation products of E2 and EE2 described in the
386
literature. By comparing the LTQ-Orbitrap data with that in the library, major transformation
387
products of E2 and EE2 by microalgae were determined to be hydroxylated and dialdehyde
388
products. Using the similar approach, Cole et al. [67] indicated that 17α-trenbolone and
389
trendione were majorly bio-transformed to dehydrogenated and hydroxylated products.
390
Elsewhere, Kolodziej et al. [11] tentatively proposed the structure of some photo-transformation
391
products of 17α/ß-trenbolone and trendione in the similar way. Furthermore, additional
392
information, NMR and UV/Vis data for instance, were appended in this study for further
AC C
EP
TE D
381
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
verification and/or confirmation. NMR data confirmed three proposed structures. The blue shift
394
in UV/Vis spectra of the phototransformation products from that of the parents suggested the
395
disruption of the conjugated 4,9,11 -system of the parents upon photolysis, congruent with the
396
proposed structures.
397
RI PT
393
Recently, LTQ-Orbitrap proved itself an able tool in the investigation of potential
biologically-active by-products generated during the water treatment processes like ozonation
399
and chlorination. As an example, Gervais et al. [58] characterized eight halogenation and
400
hydroxylation products of EE2 during the chlorination of drinking water. The assigned formulae
401
suggested all the major by-products should have a structure similar to their parent EE2. Isotope
402
ratio calculation implied that chloride and bromide were added to the structure. MSn
403
fragmentation patterns indicated that halogen atoms and the additional hydroxyl group were
404
located on the A-ring. The near concurrent but late elution of halogenation products relative to
405
that of EE2 also supported the A-ring substituted reaction because the presence of halogenated
406
atoms on the A-ring would decrease the polarity of the phenolic group and thus promote the
407
retention of the by-products on reversed-phase separation column. In another study, Bourgin et
408
al. [68] characterized four major ozonation by-products of esrone-3-sulfate via a combination of
409
MSn and H/D exchange approaches. The calculated molecular formulae and changes in m/z
410
during the H/D exchange experiment determined whether a carbonyl group or a hydroxyl group
411
was attached to the parent during ozonation treatment. MSn spectral interpretation provided
412
further hint on the location of the carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. Finally, in-house synthesized or
413
commercially available standards further confirmed the structure.
414
5.5 Orbitrap, Quadrople-Linear Ion-Trap and LTQ-FT-ICR
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
398
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
415
Apart from the above-stated mass spectrometers, Table 1 also listed examples of application of Orbitrap [69] and LTQ-FT-ICR [70] on estrogen metabolite characterization. Here, orbitrap
417
functions similarly to a sole TOF analyzer, while LTQ-FT-ICR was analogous to LTQ-Orbitrap.
418
6. Concluding remarks
RI PT
416
Low-mass accuracy and resolution MS like TQ and IT-MS hitherto still play a role in the
420
tentative identification of unknowns, while to achieve unambiguous identification the authentic
421
standards are essential. The unavailability of the standards substantially compromises their
422
qualitative capability. The development of HRAM-MS has greatly aided metabolite
423
identification arising from their accurate mass measurement capacity. As a result, a hybrid MS
424
system that offers accurate mass data and CID fragmentation data has been proven to be a
425
powerful tool in structural elucidation of steroid hormone metabolites in the environmental
426
samples. In the application examples present here (Table 1), orthogonal techniques and spectral
427
interpretation skills manifest the effectiveness of the hybrid MS systems.
M AN U
TE D
428
SC
419
The success of structural elucidation of unknowns relies not only on instrumentation but also on better software algorithms, especially those for screening and fragmentation pathway
430
prediction of the unknowns, which are not yet fully developed. Software with sufficient selection
431
and filtering parameters is necessary to ensure a priori selection of interested peaks and
432
elimination of false-positive and false-negative results. Advanced software solutions for
433
fragmentation pathway prediction need to be developed to consider rearrangement reactions [31].
434
Additionally, since quantum mechanical approaches with DFT for example were often employed
435
to provide theoretical insights into the fragmentation pathways, better computational resources
436
are also necessary for optimum electron density calculation.
AC C
EP
429
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
437
Summing up, this review aims to provide the progress in application of LC-MS on structural elucidation of steroid hormone degradation and transformation products in the environment.
439
Structural elucidation steps together with fragmentation pathways of pronated and deprotonated
440
molecules are also discussed. The information provided in this review is useful for future
441
identification of novel metabolites of other environmental emerging contaminants. However, one
442
need to bear in mind that structural elucidation based on routine MS analysis is sometimes
443
inadequate to assign the identity of the unknown; alternatively, orthogonal techniques are needed
444
to assist identification. Also, gaining as much as possible knowledge on experimental parameters
445
and physiochemical properties of the parent compounds is pivot for identity assignment of novel
446
metabolites.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
438
447
Acknowledgement
448
This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under
EP
TE D
Project No: 2036-12130-011-00D
AC C
449
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References [1] Y.Q. Liang, G.Y. Huang, S.S. Liu, J.L. Zhao, Y.Y. Yang, X.W. Chen, F. Tian, Y.X. Jiang, G.G. Ying, Long-term exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of progesterone and norgestrel affects sex
RI PT
differentiation in zebrafish (Danio rerio), Aquat Toxicol, 160 (2015) 172-179.
[2] L.G. Parks, C.S. Lambright, E.F. Orlando, L.J. Guillette, G.T. Ankley, L.E. Gray, Masculinization of female mosquitofish in kraft mill effluent-contaminated Fenholloway River water is associated with
SC
androgen receptor agonist activity, Toxicol Sci, 62 (2001) 257-267.
[3] S. Jobling, M. Nolan, C.R. Tyler, G. Brighty, J.P. Sumpter, Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish,
M AN U
Environ Sci Technol, 32 (1998) 2498-2506.
[4] R.B. Young, T. Borch, Sources, Presence, Analysis, and Fate of Steroid Sex Hormones in Freshwater Ecosystems–Areview, reproduction, 1 (2009) 3.
[5] H. Fang, W.D. Tong, W.S. Branham, C.L. Moland, S.L. Dial, H.X. Hong, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, W. Owens, D.M. Sheehan, Study of 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals for binding to the
TE D
androgen receptor, Chem Res Toxicol, 16 (2003) 1338-1358.
[6] M. Kuster, M.J.L. de Alda, D. Barceló, Estrogens and progestogens in wastewater, sludge, sediments, and soil, Water Pollution, Springer2005, pp. 1-24.
EP
[7] G.M. Anstead, K.E. Carlson, J.A. Katzenellenbogen, The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structureestrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site, Steroids, 62
AC C
(1997) 268-303.
[8] M.M. Huber, T.A. Ternes, U. von Gunten, Removal of estrogenic activity and formation of oxidation products during ozonation of 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, Environ Sci Technol, 38 (2004) 5177-5186. [9] V.K. Turan, R.I. Sanchez, J.J. Li, S.A. Li, K.R. Reuhl, P.E. Thomas, A.H. Conney, M.A. Gallo, F.C. Kauffman, S. Mesia-Vela, The effects of steroidal estrogens in ACI rat mammary carcinogenesis: 17 beta-estradiol, 2-hydroxyestradiol, 4-hydroxyestradiol, 16 alpha-hydroxyestradiol, and 4-hydroxyestrone, J Endocrinol, 183 (2004) 91-99.
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[10] N. Getoff, M. Gerschpacher, J. Hartmann, J.C. Huber, H. Schittl, R.M. Quint, The 4-hydroxyestrone: Electron emission, formation of secondary metabolites and mechanisms of carcinogenesis, J Photoch Photobio B, 98 (2010) 20-24.
RI PT
[11] E.P. Kolodziej, S. Qu, K.L. Forsgren, S.A. Long, J.B. Gloer, G.D. Jones, D. Schlenk, J. Baltrusaitis, D.M. Cwiertny, Identification and Environmental Implications of Photo-Transformation Products of Trenbolone Acetate Metabolites, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 5031-5041.
SC
[12] J.L. Little, C.D. Cleven, S.D. Brown, Identification of "Known Unknowns" Utilizing Accurate Mass Data and Chemical Abstracts Service Databases, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 22 (2011) 348-359.
M AN U
[13] Z.L. Fan, S.M. Wu, H. Chang, J.Y. Hu, Behaviors of Glucocorticoids, Androgens and Progestogens in a Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant: Comparison to Estrogens, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 27252733.
[14] T. Borch, J.G. Davis, Y.-Y. Yang, R.B. Young, Occurrence of steroid sex hormones in the Cache la Poudre River: and pathways for the removal in the environment, Completion report (Colorado Water
TE D
Institute); no. 216, DOI (2009).
[15] F.F. Scherr, A.K. Sarmah, H.J. Di, K.C. Cameron, Degradation and metabolite formation of 17 betaestradiol-3-sulphate in New Zealand pasture soils, Environ Int, 35 (2009) 291-297.
EP
[16] S.L. Shrestha, F.X.M. Casey, H. Hakk, D.J. Smith, G. Padmanabhan, Fate and Transformation of an Estrogen Conjugate and Its Metabolites in Agricultural Soils, Environ Sci Technol, 46 (2012) 11047-
AC C
11053.
[17] T. Kosjek, E. Heath, M. Petrovic, D. Barcelo, Mass spectrometry for identifying pharmaceutical biotransformation products in the environment, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 26 (2007) 1076-1085. [18] A. Gentili, S. Marchese, D. Perret, MS techniques for analyzing phenols, their metabolites and transformation products of environmental interest, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 27 (2008) 888-903. [19] Y. Pico, D. Barcelo, Transformation products of emerging contaminants in the environment and high-resolution mass spectrometry: a new horizon, Anal Bioanal Chem, 407 (2015) 6257-6273.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[20] A.A. Bletsou, J. Jeon, J. Hollender, E. Archontaki, N.S. Thomaidis, Targeted and non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric workflows for identification of transformation products of emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 66 (2015) 32-44.
RI PT
[21] M. Krauss, H. Singer, J. Hollender, LC-high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to the identification of unknowns, Anal Bioanal Chem, 397 (2010) 943-951.
[22] S. Barbic, M. Biosic, I. Skoric, Transformation Products of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment:
SC
Formation and Analysis, Curr Org Chem, 22 (2018) 987-1004.
[23] A. Aguera, M.J.M. Bueno, A.R. Fernandez-Alba, New trends in the analytical determination of
M AN U
emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters, Environ Sci Pollut R, 20 (2013) 3496-3515.
[24] J. Acena, S. Stampachiacchiere, S. Perez, D. Barcelo, Advances in liquid chromatography-highresolution mass spectrometry for quantitative and qualitative environmental analysis, Anal Bioanal Chem, 407 (2015) 6289-6299.
TE D
[25] E. De Hoffmann, J. Charette, V. Stroobant, Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications, 1997. [26] W.M. Niessen, Interpretation of MS-MS mass spectra of drugs and pesticides, John Wiley & Sons2017.
R111. 009407.
EP
[27] M. Wilm, Principles of electrospray ionization, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, DOI (2011) mcp.
AC C
[28] M. Llorca, S. Rodríguez-Mozaz, State-of-the-art of screening methods for the rapid identification of chemicals in drinking water, DOI (2013). [29] J.M. Wells, S.A. McLuckey, Collision-induced dissociation (CID) of peptides and proteins, Method Enzymol, 402 (2005) 148-185. [30] A.R. Johnson, E.E. Carlson, Collision-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry: A Powerful Tool for Natural Product Structure Elucidation, Anal Chem, 87 (2015) 10668-10678.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[31] F.Y. Guan, L.R. Soma, Y. Luo, C.E. Uboh, S. Peterman, Collision-induced dissociation pathways of anabolic steroids by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 17 (2006) 477-489.
RI PT
[32] D.P. Demarque, A.E.M. Crotti, R. Vessecchi, J.L.C. Lopes, N.P. Lopes, Fragmentation reactions using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: an important tool for the structural elucidation and characterization of synthetic and natural products, Nat Prod Rep, 33 (2016) 432-455.
SC
[33] J. Adams, Charge-Remote Fragmentations - Analytical Applications and Fundamental-Studies, Mass Spectrom Rev, 9 (1990) 141-186.
M AN U
[34] J. Adams, M.L. Gross, Charge-Remote Fragmentations of Closed-Shell Ions - a Thermolytic Analogy, J Am Chem Soc, 111 (1989) 435-440.
[35] M.L. Gross, Charge-Remote Fragmentations - Method, Mechanism and Applications, Int J Mass Spectrom, 118 (1992) 137-165.
[36] S. Bourcier, C. Poisson, Y. Souissi, S. Kinani, S. Bouchonnet, M. Sablier, Elucidation of the
TE D
decomposition pathways of protonated and deprotonated estrone ions: application to the identification of photolysis products, Rapid Commun Mass Sp, 24 (2010) 2999-3010. [37] Y.K. Sun, C.G. Gu, X.M. Liu, W.Z. Liang, P. Yao, J.L. Bolton, R.B. van Breemen, Ultrafiltration
EP
tandem mass spectrometry of estrogens for characterization of structure and affinity for human estrogen receptors, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 16 (2005) 271-279.
AC C
[38] L. Tedmon, J.S. Barnes, H.P. Nguyen, K.A. Schug, Differentiating Isobaric Steroid Hormone Metabolites Using Multi-Stage Tandem Mass Spectrometry, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 24 (2013) 399-409. [39] W.J. Barr, T. Yi, D. Aga, O. Acevedo, W.F. Harper, Using Electronic Theory To Identify Metabolites Present in 17α-Ethinylestradiol Biotransformation Pathways, Environ Sci Technol, 46 (2012) 760-768. [40] S.G. Musharraf, A. Ali, N.T. Khan, M. Yousuf, M.I. Choudhary, Atta-ur-Rahman, Tandem mass spectrometry approach for the investigation of the steroidal metabolism: Structure-fragmentation
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
relationship (SFR) in anabolic steroids and their metabolites by ESI-MS/MS analysis, Steroids, 78 (2013) 171-181. [41] F.Y. Guan, C.E. Uboh, L.R. Soma, Y.W. You, Y. Liu, X.Q. Li, Correlation of product ion profiles
RI PT
with molecular structures of androgenic and anabolic steroids in ESI MS/MS, J Mass Spectrom, 45 (2010) 1261-1269.
[42] O.J. Pozo, P. Van Eenoo, K. Deventer, S. Grimalt, J.V. Sancho, F. Hernandez, F.T. Delbeke,
SC
Collision-induced dissociation of 3-keto anabolic steroids and related compounds after electrospray ionization. Considerations for structural elucidation, Rapid Commun Mass Sp, 22 (2008) 4009-4024.
M AN U
[43] C.A. Smith, E.J. Want, G. O'Maille, R. Abagyan, G. Siuzdak, XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using Nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification, Anal Chem, 78 (2006) 779-787.
[44] T. De Vijlder, D. Valkenborg, F. Lemiere, E.P. Romijn, K. Laukens, F. Cuyckens, A tutorial in small molecule identification via electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: The practical art of structural
TE D
elucidation, Mass Spectrom Rev, 37 (2018) 607-629.
[45] F.Q. Peng, G.G. Ying, B. Yang, S. Liu, H.J. Lai, Y.S. Liu, Z.F. Chen, G.J. Zhou, Biotransformation of progesterone and norgestrel by two freshwater microalgae (Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella
EP
pyrenoidosa): Transformation kinetics and products identification, Chemosphere, 95 (2014) 581-588. [46] S. Liu, G.G. Ying, Y.S. Liu, F.Q. Peng, L.Y. He, Degradation of Norgestrel by Bacteria from
AC C
Activated Sludge: Comparison to Progesterone, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 10266-10276. [47] Z. Frontistis, C. Drosou, K. Tyrovola, D. Mantzavinos, D. Fatta-Kassinos, D. Venieri, N.P. Xekoukoulotakis, Experimental and Modeling Studies of the Degradation of Estrogen Hormones in Aqueous TiO2 Suspensions under Simulated Solar Radiation, Ind Eng Chem Res, 51 (2012) 16552-16563. [48] L.A. Mao, Q.G. Huang, Q. Luo, J.H. Lu, X. Yang, S.X. Gao, Ligninase-mediated removal of 17 beta-estradiol from water in the presence of natural organic matter: Efficiency and pathways, Chemosphere, 80 (2010) 469-473.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[49] L. Ma, S.R. Yates, Degradation and metabolite formation of 17ß-estradiol-3-glucuronide and 17ßestradiol-3-sulphate in river water and sediment, Water Res, 139 (2018) 1-9. [50] M. Maekawa, M. Shimada, T. Iida, J. Goto, N. Mano, Tandem mass spectrometric characterization
RI PT
of bile acids and steroid conjugates based on low-energy collision-induced dissociation, Steroids, 80 (2014) 80-91.
[51] Y. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Gao, S.Y. Pang, J. Ma, J.B. Duan, Q. Guo, J. Li, Y. Yang, Oxidation of steroid
SC
estrogens by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and effect of bromide and chloride ions: Kinetics, products, and modeling, Water Res, 138 (2018) 56-66.
M AN U
[52] A. Fabregat, O.J. Pozo, J. Marcos, J. Segura, R. Ventura, Use of LC-MS/MS for the Open Detection of Steroid Metabolites Conjugated with Glucuronic Acid, Anal Chem, 85 (2013) 5005-5014. [53] J. Marcos, O.J. Pozo, Current LC-MS methods and procedures applied to the identification of new steroid metabolites, J Steroid Biochem, 162 (2016) 41-56.
[54] J.L. Kerwin, J.J. Torvik, Identification of monohydroxy fatty acids by electrospray mass
TE D
spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem, 237 (1996) 56-64. [55] H. Frauendorf, R. Herzschuh, Application of high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometry for identification of carboxylic acids containing several carboxyl groups from aqueous
EP
solutions, Eur Mass Spectrom, 4 (1998) 269-278.
[56] W.L. Sun, S. Li, J.X. Mai, J.R. Ni, Initial photocatalytic degradation intermediates/pathways of 17
AC C
alpha-ethynylestradiol: Effect of pH and methanol, Chemosphere, 81 (2010) 92-99. [57] J. Skotnicka-Pitak, W.O. Khunjar, N.G. Love, D.S. Aga, Characterization of Metabolites Formed During the Biotransformation of 17 alpha-Ethinylestradiol by Nitrosomonas europaea in Batch and Continuous Flow Bioreactors, Environ Sci Technol, 43 (2009) 3549-3555. [58] G. Gervais, E. Bichon, J.P. Antignac, F. Monteau, G. Leroy, L. Barritaud, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, B. Le Bizec, Differential global profiling as a new analytical strategy for revealing micropollutant treatment by-products: Application to ethinylestradiol and chlorination water treatment, Chemosphere, 83 (2011) 1553-1559. 28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[59] L. Lloret, G. Eibes, M.T. Moreira, G. Feijoo, J.M. Lema, Removal of Estrogenic Compounds from Filtered Secondary Wastewater Effluent in a Continuous Enzymatic Membrane Reactor. Identification of Biotransformation Products, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 4536-4543.
RI PT
[60] R. Taboada-Puig, G. Eibes, L. Lloret, T.A. Lu-Chau, G. Feijoo, M.T. Moreira, J.M. Lema, Fostering the action of versatile peroxidase as a highly efficient biocatalyst for the removal of endocrine disrupting compounds, New Biotechnol, 33 (2016) 187-195.
SC
[61] J.L. Chen, S. Ravindran, S. Swift, L.J. Wright, N. Singhal, Catalytic oxidative degradation of 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol by Fe-III-TAML/H2O2: Estrogenicities of the products of partial, and extensive
M AN U
oxidation, Water Res, 46 (2012) 6309-6318.
[62] X.H. Wang, J.Y. Yao, S.Y. Wang, X.X. Pan, R.Y. Xiao, Q.G. Huang, Z.Y. Wang, R.J. Qu, Phototransformation of estrogens mediated by Mn(III), not by reactive oxygen species, in the presence of humic acids, Chemosphere, 201 (2018) 224-233.
[63] S. Wang, X. Wang, C. Li, X. Xu, Z. Wei, Z. Wang, R. Qu, Photodegradation of 17β-estradiol on
TE D
silica gel and natural soil by UV treatment, Environ Pollut, 242 (2018) 1236-1244. [64] Y. Souissi, S. Bourcier, S. Bouchonnet, C. Genty, M. Sablier, Estrone direct photolysis: By-product identification using LC-Q-TOF, Chemosphere, 87 (2012) 185-193.
EP
[65] P.H. Wang, C.P. Yu, T.H. Lee, C.W. Lin, W. Ismail, S.P. Wey, A.T. Kuo, Y.R. Chiang, Anoxic Androgen Degradation by the Denitrifying Bacterium Sterolibacterium denitrificans via the 2,3-seco
AC C
Pathway, Appl Environ Microb, 80 (2014) 3442-3452. [66] A. Hom-Diaz, M. Llorca, S. Rodriguez-Mozaz, T. Vicent, D. Barcelo, P. Blanquez, Microalgae cultivation on wastewater digestate: beta-estradiol and 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol degradation and transformation products identification, J Environ Manage, 155 (2015) 106-113. [67] E.A. Cole, S.A. McBride, K.C. Kimbrough, J. Lee, E.A. Marchand, D.M. Cwiertny, E.P. Kolodziej, Rates and product identification for trenbolone acetate metabolite biotransformation under aerobic conditions, Environ Toxicol Chem, 34 (2015) 1472-1484.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[68] M. Bourgin, G. Gervais, E. Bichon, J.-P. Antignac, F. Monteau, G. Leroy, L. Barritaud, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, B. Le Bizec, Differential chemical profiling to identify ozonation byproducts of estrone-sulfate and first characterization of estrogenicity in generated drinking water, Water
RI PT
Res, 47 (2013) 3791-3802. [69] K. Sun, Q. Luo, Y. Gao, Q. Huang, Laccase-catalyzed reactions of 17β-estradiol in the presence of humic acid: Resolved by high-resolution mass spectrometry in combination with 13C labeling,
SC
Chemosphere, 145 (2016) 394-401.
[70] S. Karim, S. Bae, D. Greenwood, K. Hanna, N. Singhal, Degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol by nano
M AN U
zero valent iron under different pH and dissolved oxygen levels, Water Res, 125 (2017) 32-41. [71] N.S. Rannulu, R.B. Cole, Novel Fragmentation Pathways of Anionic Adducts of Steroids Formed by Electrospray Anion Attachment Involving Regioselective Attachment, Regiospecific Decompositions, Charge-Induced Pathways, and Ion-Dipole Complex Intermediates, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 23 (2012) 1558-1568.
TE D
[72] K.M. Wooding, R.M. Barkley, J.A. Hankin, C.A. Johnson, A.P. Bradford, N. Santoro, R.C. Murphy, Mechanism of Formation of the Major Estradiol Product Ions Following Collisional Activation of the Molecular Anion in a Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 24 (2013) 1451-
EP
1455.
[73] X.Y. Ma, C. Zhang, J. Deng, Y.L. Song, Q.S. Li, Y.P. Guo, C. Li, Simultaneous Degradation of
AC C
Estrone, 17 beta-Estradiol and 17 alpha-Ethinyl Estradiol in an Aqueous UV/H2O2 System, Int J Env Res Pub He, 12 (2015) 12016-12029. [74] W.O. Khunjar, S.A. Mackintosh, J. Skotnicka-Pitak, S. Baik, D.S. Aga, N.G. Love, Elucidating the Relative Roles of Ammonia Oxidizing and Heterotrophic Bacteria during the Biotransformation of 17 alpha-Ethinylestradiol and Trimethoprim, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 3605-3612. [75] P. Mazellier, L. Méité, J.D. Laat, Photodegradation of the steroid hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in dilute aqueous solution, Chemosphere, 73 (2008) 1216-1223.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[76] L. Méité, B.D. Soro, N.K. Aboua, V. Mambo, K.S. Traoré, P. Mazellier, J. De Laat, Qualitative Determination of Photodegradation Products of Progesterone and Testosterone in Aqueous Solution, Am J Anal Chem, 7 (2016) 22.
RI PT
[77] Q. Yu, J. Geng, H. Huo, K. Xu, H. Huang, H. Hu, H. Ren, Bioaugmentated activated sludge degradation of progesterone: Kinetics and mechanism, Chem Eng J, 352 (2018) 214-224.
[78] L. Barritaud, G. Leroy, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, E. Bichon, G. Gervais, M. Bourgin,
estrone sulfate, Water Sci Tech-W Sup, 13 (2013) 1302-1308.
SC
J.P. Antignac, F. Monteau, B. Le Bizec, Identification of treatment by-products of the ozonation of
M AN U
[79] M. Fahrbach, M. Krauss, A. Preiss, H.P.E. Kohler, J. Hollender, Anaerobic testosterone degradation in Steroidobacter denitrificans - Identification of transformation products, Environ Pollut, 158 (2010) 2572-2581.
[80] P.A. Segura, P. Kaplan, V. Yargeau, Identification and structural elucidation of ozonation transformation products of estrone, Chem Cent J, 7 (2013).
TE D
[81] J.O. Ojoghoro, A.J. Chaudhary, P. Campo, J.P. Sumpter, M.D. Scrimshaw, Progesterone potentially degrades to potent androgens in surface waters, Sci Total Environ, 579 (2017) 1876-1884. [82] J.H. Li, Y. Zhang, Q.G. Huang, H.H. Shi, Y. Yang, S.X. Gao, L. Mao, X. Yang, Degradation of
EP
organic pollutants mediated by extracellular peroxidase in simulated sunlit humic waters: A case study with 17 beta-estradiol, J Hazard Mater, 331 (2017) 123-131.
AC C
[83] Y.L. Chen, H.Y. Fu, T.H. Lee, C.J. Shih, L. Huang, Y.S. Wang, W. Ismail, Y.R. Chiang, Estrogen Degraders and Estrogen Degradation Pathway Identified in an Activated Sludge, Appl Environ Microb, 84 (2018).
[84] Y.Y. Yang, L.P. Pereyra, R.B. Young, K.F. Reardon, T. Borch, Testosterone-Mineralizing Culture Enriched from Swine Manure: Characterization of Degradation Pathways and Microbial Community Composition, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 6879-6886. [85] R.B. Young, D.E. Latch, D.B. Mawhinney, T.H. Nguyen, J.C.C. Davis, T. Borch, Direct Photodegradation of Androstenedione and Testosterone in Natural Sunlight: Inhibition by Dissolved 31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Organic Matter and Reduction of Endocrine Disrupting Potential, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 84168424. [86] L.H. Shan, Y. Li, Y.J. Chen, M.H. Yin, J.J. Huang, Z.Z. Zhang, X.F. Shi, H.M. Liu, Microbial
RI PT
hydroxylation of 17-estradiol by Penicillium brevicompactum, Biocatal Biotransfor, 34 (2016) 137-143. [87] S. Larcher, G. Delbès, B. Robaire, V. Yargeau, Degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol by ozonation — Identification of the by-products and assessment of their estrogenicity and toxicity, Environ Int, 39 (2012)
SC
66-72.
[88] Y.L. Chen, C.P. Yu, T.H. Lee, K.S. Goh, K.H. Chu, P.H. Wang, W. Ismail, C.J. Shih, Y.R. Chiang,
AC C
EP
TE D
Cell Chem Biol, 24 (2017) 712-+.
M AN U
Biochemical Mechanisms and Catabolic Enzymes Involved in Bacterial Estrogen Degradation Pathways,
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure captions: Figure 1. Steroid nomenclature and structures of major steroid hormones investigated in
RI PT
literature. Figure 2. Charge-remote (outlined by dash square) and charge-induced fragmentation pathways of deprotonated 17ß-estradiol (a), protonated 17ß-estradiol (b) and protonated boldenone (c).
SC
Date are adapted from and modified based on [31, 36, 71, 72].
Figure 3. CID spectra (adapted from [37]) of deprotonated equilin (a), 17ß-equilin (b) and 17ß-
M AN U
estradiol and proposed formation pathways of selected product ions.
AC C
EP
TE D
Figure 4. Overall workflow for structural elucidation of transformation metabolites.
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18 11
19 1
12
C 9
10
B
A
16
15
7
5
4
8
14
6
OH
O
H
OH
H
OH
H
Estrogen H
H
H
H
HO
Estrone
OH
OH H H
H
Progesterone
O
H
H
H
H
O
Testosterone
Androstenedione
OH
Anabolic steroids
OH
H
EP
H H
O
H
TE D
H O
H
H
O
Trenbolone
AC C
Boldenone
H
Levonorgestrel
Norethindrone
OH
Androgen
H
H
O
O
O
H
M AN U
H
H
H
Figure 1.
34
H
Ethynylestradiol
Estriol
O
H
H
HO
HO
17 -Estradiol
Progestagen
H
OH
H
SC
H HO
RI PT
R1
17
D
2 3
R2
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
a. -
m/z 145 O
-
H
m/z 143 O
OH
-
-H2O O
OH
m/z 271 O
-
RI PT
H
m/z 253
H
m/z 271 O
OH
OH
-
O
-
-
O
m/z 271
O
m/z 239
M AN U
m/z 271
OH
OH
OH
OH
SC
-CH3OH
13 17
-
-
H
-
-
O
O
O
O
14
14
15
TE D
15
O
-
m/z 183
b. OH2+
+ Transfer
OH
OH
AC C
c.
OH
OH
m/z 287
OH
m/z 255
14
16
15
O
OH
17
H
13
m/z 271
OH
H OH
+ OH
H
m/z 255
m/z 255
OH
m/z 159
OH OH
+ H OH
m/z 287
m/z 271
13
OH
OH
+
+
13
+
OH
m/z 255
m/z 273
-
H
O
+
of the methyl group
EP
-H2O
+
OH
17
17
m/z 271
16
15
-
H16
O
16
14
m/z 271
m/z 271
m/z 271
m/z 271
16
14 15
m/z 287
rH OH
Figure 2.
35
H -H O 2 +
m/z 287
+
m/z 153
+ +
m/z 135
m/z 135
AC C
EP
Figure 3.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Sample preparation
Elemental composition assignment
Match of product ion spectrum with parallel data in database or literature
Interpretation of product ions and proposal of fragmentation pathways
M AN U
Structure searching in database
SC
Screening for “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”
RI PT
Full scan and product ion scan analysis
Using orthogonal techniques and/or electronic theory to assist identification or confirm the results
AC C
EP
Figure 4.
TE D
Confirmation using authentic standards if available
37
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1. Structural elucidation and identification of degradation and transformation products of steroid hormones in the environment based on laboratory studies
EE2
E2, EE2 Progesterone, testosterone EE2
Progesterone 17α-TBOH, 17ß-
TBOH, TBO
MS analyzer
One intermediate was characterized 4-OH-EE2, sulfo-EE2
Biotransformation in the UV/H2O2 system Biotransformation by ammonia oxidizing bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria Photodegradation
ESI
IT
ESI
IT
APCI
IT
Photodegradation
APCI
IT
Transformation by nano zero valent iron in buffered solution
ESI
LTQ-FT ICR
Biodegradation by activated sludge from WWTP Direct photolysis
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
Photodegradation
Hydroxylated phenolic- or quinone-type compounds Isomerization, enolization, oxidation and hydration Hydrogenation, hydroxylation, radical coupling Dehydrogenation, saturation, ring-cleavage Hydroxylated and dialdehyde products
Comments on identification strategies
RI PT
Ion source ESI
IT
The structures of the intermediates were deducted on the basis of LC-MS data and the prior knowledge of photocatalytic mechanisms, with further identification 2 3 4 and verification by LC-MS , MS , and MS Referring to prior data of parallel studies
SC
E1, E2, EE2
Degradation/transformation type
M AN U
EE2
Major transformation products/reaction ·OH or ·OOH induced hydroxylation and decarboxylation reaction
TE D
Parent compound
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
E1, hydroxylated and dialdehyde products
Degradation by cultivated algae
17α-TBOH, 17ß-
Dehydrogenation, hydroxylation
Biotransformation
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
TBOH, TBO E1-3S
Hydroxylation
Ozonation in river water
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
EE2
Halogenation and hydroxylation on the A-ring Carbonylation, hydroxylation
Chlorination in drinking water
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
Ozonation
ESI
LTQ-Orbitrap
Dehydrogenation, hydrogenation Presence of carboxylic acid and hydroxyl group Oligomers
Anaerobic biodegradation
APCI
LTQ-Orbitrap
Ozonation transformation
APCI
LTQ-Orbitrap
Laccase-catalyzed transformation in
ESI
Orbitrap
E1-3S Testosterone E1 E2
EP
E2, EE2
AC C
1 2
38
LTQ-Orbitrap
Reference [56]
[73]
Structurally-informative fragmentation were made based n on MS ; NMR confirmation
[74]
Using a model compound 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthol
[75]
Identify assignment based on personal interpretation of spectra and referral to literature Accurate mass data were used for identification. MSn data were used for confirmation
[76]
Part of degradation products were confirmed using authentic standards Analogy to previously confirmed products; Part of the compounds were confirmed by NMR analysis
[77]
Degradation products of E2 and EE2 from the literature was compiled to build an in-house library which was used for identification By analogy to published data
[66]
[70]
[11]
[67]
Structure was postulated based on characteristic neutral losses Halogenated isotopic patterns helped the identification
[78]
Based on H/D exchange, MSn and accurate mass measurement strategies [4-14C]-Testosterone and NMR were used to assist identification Structural illustration based on MSn and deuteriumlabeled E1 (E1-D4) 13 C labeled E2 was used to identify cross-coupling
[68]
[58]
[79] [80] [69]
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EE2
Hydroxylation, hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, side-chain breakdown Oxidized to carboxylic acid,
products ESI
TQ
Confirmation using authentic standards if available
Ozonation
ESI
TQ
Dehydrogenation, hydrogenation, hydroxylation Hydroxylated, ring-cleavage products Oligomers
Biodegradation by bacteria from activated sludge from WWTP TiO2 photocatalysis in water matrix
ESI
TQ
ESI
TQ
Ligninase-mediated transformation
ESI
TQ
Desaturation, hydroxylation, dehydrogenation A-ring dehydrogenation product Hydroxylation, polymerization
Biodegradation by riverine sediment
ESI
TQ
Degradation by river water
ESI
TQ and Q-TOF
ESI
RI PT
Progesterone, norgestrel
darkness in humic acid-containing solution Biotransformation by microalgae isolated from lake water
Full scan to determine the precursor ions; precursor ion scan and product ion scan to determine the structure of major oxidation products; oxidation products of EE2 were derived from model compounds and were confirmed by either GC-MS or authentic standards if applicable Confirmation using authentic standards if available
[8]
[47]
Q-TOF
Byproducts were tentatively identified by referring to previous literature Molecular modeling was applied to postulate coupling reaction pathways Confirmation by GC/MS and using authentic standards if available EAWAG BBD prediction alongside literature references; confirmation by Q-TOF Confirmation using authentic standards if available
ESI
Q-TOF
Confirmation using standards
[83]
ESI
Q-TOF
[64]
ESI
Q-TOF
The use of CID, accurate mass measurement and the use of model compounds and 2H-labled E1 permitted the structure proposed Structures were proposed based on molecular accurate mass, chromatographic retention times, product ion spectra
Quantum chemical calculations were performed based on the density functional theory method to identify the potential reaction sites Three products were confirmed using authentic standards
[62]
α/ß-hydroxy acid
E2 E1 E1
E2, EE2
E1, E2, E3, EE2
Testosterone Androstenedione, testosterone
Ring-cleavage products, pyridinestrone acid Hydroxylation
Enzymatic catalyzed photolysis in humic acid-containing solution Biodegradation by degraders in activated sludge from STP Direct photolysis
M AN U
TE D
Progesterone
EP
E2-3S, E2-3G
Formation of hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups on A ring of parent compounds, ethinyl group intact Dimer, trimers, and tetramers
Peroxymonosulfate oxidation of steroid estrogens
Mn (Ⅲ) mediated phototransformation
ESI
Q-TOF
Dehydrogenation, hydroxylation Rearrangement, hydration, and more highly oxidized
Biodegradation by swine manure
ESI
Q-TOF
Direct photodegradation
ESI
Q-TOF
AC C
E2
SC
containing products
Progesterone, norgestrel EE2
[45]
39
[46]
[48] [49] [81] [82]
[51]
[84] [85]
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
E1, testosterone
E1, E2, EE2 EE2
Dimer, trimer Two epimers
E1, E2, EE2
Dimer, trimer
Q-TOF
13
Photodegradation
ESI
Q-TOF
Biodegradation Ozonation
ESI APCI
Q-TOF Q-TOF
Quantum chemical calculations were performed based on the density functional theory method to identify the potential reaction sites Confirmation by NMR analysis Identification by referring to deuterated EE2.
[86] [87]
Biodegradation by bacterial strains and activated sludge from STP and river water Laccase catalysis Degradation by iron tetra-amido macro-cyclic ligand complex Transformation by peroxidase
ESI
HDMS-QTOF
Two metabolites were confirmed by NMR
[88]
ESI ESI
TOF TOF
Confirmation by NMR analysis
[59] [61]
ESI
TOF
C labeled-testosterone
[65] [63]
[60]
EP
TE D
E1, estrone; E2, 17ß-estradiol; EE2,17α-ethynylestradiol; 17α-TBOH, 17α-trenbolone; 17ß-TBOH,17ß-trenbolone; TBO, trendione; E1-3S, estrone-3-sulfate; E2-3G, 17ß-estradiol3-glucuronide; E2-3S, 17ß-estradiol-3-sulfate; STP: sewage treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance; HDMS, high definition mass spectrometry (from Waters); IT: ion trap; LTQ-FT ICR, linear trap quadruple-Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance; LTQ-Orbitrap, linear trap quadruple-Orbitrap; TQ, triple quadruple; Q-TOF, quadruple time-of-flight; TOF, time-of-flight; GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; LC-MS; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; H/D exchange, hydrogen/deuterium exchange; CID, collision-induced dissociation; ESI, electrospray ionization; APCI, atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization
AC C
3 4 5 6 7
Hydroxylation Two muconic acid derivatives with open phenolic ring structures Hydroxylated products, metacleavage product
ESI
RI PT
E2 EE2
Biotransformation
SC
E2
photoproducts A-ring cleavage product with 17 carbons E1, hydroxylated products, oligomers
M AN U
Testosterone
40
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights:
RI PT
SC M AN U
•
TE D
•
EP
•
LC-MS capacities and overall MS-based steps for structural elucidation of novel metabolites of environmental steroid hormones were generalized. Fragmentation reactions and fragmentation pathways of protonated and deprotonated molecules of the metabolites were summarized. Versatile orthogonal techniques and intelligent spectral interpretation strategies used in literature for structural elucidation were specified. Up-to-date applications of LC-MS on structural elucidation of biotic and abiotic transformation products of environmental steroid hormones were provided.
AC C
•