A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Accepted Manuscript A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Li...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 53 Views

Accepted Manuscript A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Li Ma, Scott R. Yates PII:

S0165-9936(18)30469-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.007

Reference:

TRAC 15271

To appear in:

Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Received Date: 9 September 2018 Revised Date:

4 October 2018

Accepted Date: 6 October 2018

Please cite this article as: L. Ma, S.R. Yates, A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.007. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

A review on structural elucidation of metabolites of environmental

RI PT

steroid hormones via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

a

SC

Li Maa,b* and Scott R. Yatesb

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United

b

M AN U

States

Contaminant Fate and Transport Unit, Salinity Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States

TE D

Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California 92507, United States

AC C

EP

* To whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail: [email protected]

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Abstract This review covers liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) strategies for

3

structural elucidation of degradation and transformation products of environmental steroid

4

hormones due to their estrogenic and/or androgenic effects on environmental living life. We

5

focus on identification fundamentals of unknown metabolites rather than on target analysis. We

6

discuss LC-MS capacities and overall MS-based steps for structural elucidation of unknown

7

metabolites. Also summarized in the review are the fragmentation reactions and fragmentation

8

pathways of protonated and deprotonated molecules of unknown compounds. We pay particular

9

attention to versatile orthogonal techniques (e.g., isotopic labeling, hydrogen/deuterium

10

exchange and model compound utilization) associated with MS and intelligent spectral

11

interpretation strategies used in literature for structural elucidation of steroid hormone

12

metabolites. We provide up-to-date applications of LC-MS on structural elucidation of biotic and

13

abiotic transformation products of steroid hormones in environmental samples. Most of what is

14

discussed in this review also applies to other emerging environmental contaminants.

SC

M AN U

TE D

technique; degradation and transformation product; environmental steroid hormone

EP

16

Keywords: Structural elucidation; liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; orthogonal

AC C

15

RI PT

2

2

Abbreviations

18

APCI, Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization

19

API, Atmospheric-pressure ionization

20

APPI, Atmospheric-pressure photoionization

21

CID, Collision-induced dissociation

22

DFT, Density functional theory

23

EI, Electron ionization

24

ESI, Electrospray ionization

25

E1, Estrone

26

E2, 17ß-Estradiol

27

EE2, 17α-Ethynylestradiol

28

FED, Frontier electron density

29

FT-ICR, Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance

30

GC-MS, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

31

HCD, Higher-energy collision-induced dissociation

32

H/D, Hydrogen/deuterium

33

HRAM, High-resolution accurate-mass

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

17

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

IT-MS, Ion-trap mass spectrometry

35

LTQ, Linear trap quadrupole

36

LC-MS, Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

37

MS, Mass spectrometry

38

MRM, Multiple reaction monitoring

39

MSn, Multistage fragmentation

40

NLS, Neutral-loss scan

41

NMR, Nuclear magnetic resonance

42

PIS, Precursor-ion scan

43

Q-TOF, Quadrupole time-of-flight

44

RDB, Ring double-bond equivalent

45

TQ, Triple-quadrupole

46

TOF, Time-of-flight

47

WWTPs, Wastewater treatment plants

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

34

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

48 49

1. Introduction Endocrine disrupting steroid hormones, including for example sex steroid hormones (majorly estrogens, androgens and progestagens) and anabolic steroids, are among the most widely

51

investigated environmental pollutants during the past few decades associated with their adverse

52

effects on aquatic organisms (e.g., feminization, decreased fertility and intersexuality)[1-3].

53

Exogenous natural and synthetic steroid hormones (i.e., not self-produced) were generally

54

reported to exhibit the highest affinities for binding to hormone receptors and thus the highest

55

disrupting potencies [4, 5]. These hormones are administrated to human and livestock for

56

medication purpose and are subsequently excreted through defecation and urination, primarily in

57

biologically-inert conjugated form, partially in biologically-active free forms, and then reach the

58

wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [6]. Part of the contaminants pass WWTPs unaltered,

59

leading to their omnipresence in surface water. Steroid hormones have a common parent sterane

60

backbone which features four fused rings, namely three cyclohexane rings (assigned as A-, B-,

61

and C-rings) and one cyclopentane ring (the D-ring). The skeleton and structures of common

62

steroid hormones investigated in the environment are shown in Figure 1.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

50

Ever since concern was raised on endocrine disruptors, numerous degradation approaches,

64

biotic and abiotic, have been conducted with the purpose to remove the contaminants from the

65

environmental compartments. In this regard, most of existing studies tackled parent compounds,

66

while relatively less information on their metabolites and transformation products has been

67

documented. This is, at least partially, due to the identification challenges. A subtle change in the

68

molecular structure of the parent compounds during the degradation and transformation process

69

would lead to changes in their potential for steroid receptor binding and thus subsequent

70

biological activities. For example, previous studies demonstrated that the phenolic A ring of

AC C

EP

63

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

estrogens was responsible for their estrogenicity [7], while modification of estrogens via

72

aromatic ring hydroxylation and cleavage can reduce their estrogenicity by a factor of 200–500

73

[8]. Nevertheless, some hydroxylated estrogens were reported to incur carcinogenesis [9, 10]. In

74

a phototransformation study on anabolic steroids, albeit the near complete phototransformation

75

of parents, biological activity of photoproduct mixtures retained, suggesting the possible

76

formation of more biologically-active and environmentally-persistent photoproducts [11].

77

Therefore, characterization of novel biodegradation and transformation products is of uttermost

78

importance for policy makers to conduct ecological risk assessment and strategy planning.

SC

From an identification point of view, compounds to be identified can be classified into three

M AN U

79

RI PT

71

classes: “known knowns”, “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” [12]. A “known

81

known” refers to a compound expected to be present in certain samples whose structure is well

82

known and its presence need to be confirmed. An identification of “known knowns” is better

83

described as an act of identity confirmation rather than identification. For example,

84

environmental analysis is mostly directed at searching for the presence of target compounds

85

which are known to the investigator and quantifying them if confirmed. For relatively polar

86

compounds like steroid hormones, this task can be best fulfilled using liquid chromatography

87

tandem-mass spectrometry based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by referring to

88

commercial standards. So far, such target-based environmental monitoring has been extensively

89

conducted, exemplified by studies on occurrence and laboratory based microcosm studies on

90

degradation kinetics of parent compounds [6, 13-16]. A “known unknown” represents a

91

compound that is unknown to the investigator but can be found in the literature or compound

92

databases. Finally, an “unknown unknown” is a compound that is not described elsewhere [12].

93

The identification of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” entails an access of more

AC C

EP

TE D

80

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

advanced instrument, versatile mass spectral libraries or databases as well as in-depth

95

interpretation of mass spectra. Generally, biotic and abiotic metabolites and transformation

96

products of the parent compounds in the environment fall in between the second and third

97

categories. Therefore, only “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” are taken into account

98

in the current review.

99

RI PT

94

There are two reviews published ten years ago discussing the structural elucidation of

metabolites of environmental contaminants by hyphenated MS techniques with one focusing on

101

pharmaceuticals and the other on phenols [17, 18]. A few recent reviews reported the advances

102

of MS in identification of transformation products of emerging environmental contaminants [19-

103

24]. However, the dissociation mechanisms of ionized molecules based on collision-induced

104

dissociation (CID) and identification strategies of yet-to be identified compounds based on, for

105

example, orthogonal techniques (e.g., isotopic labeling, derivatization, hydrogen/deuterium

106

exchange and model compound utilization), were inadequately addressed in these reviews.

107

Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize up-to-date progress in MS techniques in

108

structural elucidation of biotic and abiotic metabolites and transformation products of steroid

109

hormones in the environment. Information on fragmentation pathways of reference steroid

110

hormones was also generalized.

111

2. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) capabilities

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

100

112

It is well known that gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) equipped with an

113

electron ionization (EI) source is a popular tool in structural elucidation of unknown compounds

114

ever since its invention [25]. However, since GC-MS is applicable for volatile and thermostable

115

compounds, determination of polar and thermo-labile compounds largely relies on LC-MS.

116

Atmospheric-pressure ionization (API) is soft ionization technique used in LC-MS [26]. Three

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

kinds of API are routinely used: electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric-pressure chemical

118

ionization (APCI) and atmospheric-pressure photoionization (APPI), among which, ESI,

119

followed by APCI, is the most widely used technique in LC-MS [26] and is fairly suitable for

120

steroid hormones. Table 1 provides a quick view of the applicability of ESI and APCI in

121

identification of degradation and transformation products of steroid hormones in the environment

122

based on laboratory studies. Unlike the hard ionization technique EI under which a molecular ion

123

is dissociated into multiple fragments, ESI/APCI mostly yields intact protonated/deprotonated

124

molecules [26], which help identify the molecular mass of the analyte.

SC

RI PT

117

In essence, ionization of a molecule in ESI obeys the acid-base theory. In positive ESI,

126

molecules are protonated majorly to form [M+H]+ with m/z (M+1); while in negative ESI,

127

deprotonation ions [M–H]– with m/z (M–1) are readily generated. In addition, formation of other

128

adducts such as [M+Na]+, [M+K]+ and [M+NH4]+ in the positive mode and [M+Cl] – and

129

[M+CH3COO] – in the negative mode, for example, could also occur which can be employed to

130

pinpoint the molecular identity. In APCI, protonated and deprotonated molecules are also

131

commonly observed. Information concerning the ionization mechanisms of ESI/APCI was

132

described elsewhere [26, 27]. In the current review, only protonated and deprotonated molecules

133

in ESI/APCI are discussed, while other ionization techniques or multiply-charged ions are

134

beyond the scope of this review.

TE D

EP

AC C

135

M AN U

125

Among the common mass analyzers used so far, quadrupole and ion-trap mass spectrometers

136

(IT-MS) provide unit-mass resolution and a mass accuracy of ±0.1 for mono-charged ions over

137

the entire applicable m/z range; while high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) mass

138

spectrometers, represented by time-of-flight (TOF), orbitrap and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron

139

resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometers, feature a mass error even less than 1ppm and a

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

resolution in excess of 105 (based on full peak width at half maximum height definition) for low-

141

molecular-weight analytes [26]. Therefore, with the aid of HRAM-MS, the exact mass of both

142

precursor and product ions is measured which enables determination of an elemental

143

composition (or molecular formula). Information including advantages, disadvantages, mass

144

accuracy and mass resolution power of different analyzers were included in other reviews [18,

145

28]. Protonated or deprotonated molecules in ion source are usually selected as precursors for

146

CID in tandem MS. CID refers to the process whereby a precursor ion, via collision with a

147

neutral gas, is activated and then fragmented to form a population of product ions [29]. CID can

148

occur in a collision cell of quadruple or in ion trap at low collision energy. Low-energy CID,

149

together with higher-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) which occurs in a HCD cell of

150

an Orbitrap machine, is so far the most frequently used mass spectrometry dissociation technique

151

for the analysis of small molecules [30]. A wealth of structural information is provided thereof.

152

Based on the abovementioned capabilities of certain analyzers in elemental composition

153

assignment and its CID function, LC-ESI/APCI-MS proved itself an indispensable tool in

154

environmental analytical chemistry.

155

3. Fragmentation pathways of [M+H]+ and [M–H]–

156

3.1 Fragmentation reactions

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

140

Different from EI for which an odd-electron molecular ion is generated via loss of an

158

electron, ESI/APCI generally yields even-electron molecular ions with mostly the addition or

159

subtraction of a hydrogen ion ([M+H]+ and [M–H]–). Fragmentation of [M+H]+ and [M–H]–

160

generally obeys the even-electron rule: an even-electron is apt to form an even-electron fragment

161

ion via a neutral loss rather than form an odd-electron fragment ion via a loss of a radical.

162

Violation of the rule may also occur in some circumstances. For instance, a loss of an alkyl

AC C

157

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

radical group from a protonated or deprotonated molecule is observable for steroids [31]. Prior to

164

the proposal of the fragmentation pathways, it is essential to know typical fragmentation

165

reactions subjected to CID-MS. Studies concerning steroid hormones in this regard are relatively

166

less addressed. Yet, by analogy to a recent review [32], fragmentation reactions of protonated or

167

deprotonated steroids in available literature are classified into two major categories: charge-

168

remote fragmentation and charge-induced fragmentation. Charge-remote fragmentation is

169

characterized by charge retention in the original place with bond cleaved at a site physically

170

remote from the site of the charge [33-35]. Conversely, charge-induced fragmentation is a

171

fragmentation reaction in which the cleavage occurs adjacent to the apparent charge site,

172

resulting in charge migration to a new site. Examples of two reactions are portrayed in Figure 2.

173

It is showed that charge-remote fragmentation reactions of deprotonated ions are similar to those

174

of protonated ions because they take place in sites remote from the charge site. However, charge-

175

induced fragmentation reactions are distinct between protonated and deprotonated ions with

176

adjacent electrons transferred towards and away from the charge site, respectively.

177

3.2 Fragmentation pathway proposal

SC

M AN U

TE D

The proposal of fragmentation pathways of a specific compound depends not only on

EP

178

RI PT

163

knowledge of fragmentation reactions but also other valuable approaches. Particularly, the use of

180

HRAM-MS enables the calculation of the molecular formulae of both precursor and product ions.

181

Afterwards, the nitrogen rule can be applied to and the ring double-bond equivalent (RDB) value

182

can be calculated from the molecular formula. A positive mono-charged ion has a RDB value

183

ending in +0.5 and a negative mono-charge ion has a RDB value ending in –0.5. A molecule

184

losing an electron has an integer value. Besides, stable-isotope labeling, multistage fragmentation

185

(MSn) and certain software are also very much helpful. Noteworthy is that the concept of ion

AC C

179

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

stability was attenuated in a number of studies to propose the structure of the product ions. Guan

187

et al. [31] elucidated the fragmentation pathways of protonated anabolic steroids (e.g., boldenone,

188

trenbolone, testosterone and so on) with the aid of Mass Frontier software, accurate mass

189

measurement and MSn. The results suggested firstly that charge-induced cleavage was the most

190

important fragmentation process. Secondly, charge-induced cleavage most likely occurred at a

191

carbon atom with the most braches or strains. Thirdly, formation of priority product ions was

192

pertinent to the stability of the product ions. A product on with the charge stabilized by

193

resonance for instance has high stability. In a study to propose the fragmentation pathway of

194

protonated estrone (E1), Bourcier et al. [36] compared the CID spectra of two marker

195

compounds, namely estrone methyl ether and E1-D4 (deuterium labeled at C2, C4 and C16),

196

with that of E1 to deduce the chemical structure of product ions. The use of deuterated E1

197

implied methyl rearrangement the primary step to initial fragmentation of protonated E1. Sun et

198

al. [37] studied thoroughly the product ions of [M–H]– of estrogens and their analogs and

199

summarized that the most abundant fragment ions were consistent with the fragmentation

200

pathway of retrocyclization. The overall rule is that these product ions which formed due to the

201

elimination of small neutral molecules (e.g., H2, CH4, H2O, CO and CH3OH) and/or ring

202

cleavage are stabilized by conjugated double bonds and an aromatic ring. As illustrated in Figure

203

3, the presence of a double bond in equilin and 17ß-equilin facilitated a H2 loss, leading to the

204

aromatization of ring B, and a C17 carbonyl group in equilin favors a CH4 loss, leading to the

205

conjugation of a C13-14 double bond with the ketone carbonyl group. Conversely, such

206

mechanisms were void in 17ß-estradiol (E2). Similar rules were iterated by Tedmon et al. [38],

207

in defining the fragmentation differences between standard isobaric steroid hormones. Notably,

208

density functional theory (DFT) calculation was employed in this study to predict fragmentation

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

186

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

events based on the calculated lowest energy configurations of product ions and the predicted

210

results generally matched what was observed in CID spectra [38]. DFT together with frontier

211

electron density (FED) are common electronic theory used to predict metabolite formation of

212

estrogens in the environment [39]. Elsewhere, a few more studies [40-42] investigated the CID

213

spectra of a series of standard steroids and correlated the diagnostic fragmentation pattern with

214

their structural feature, which holds promise guiding the structural elucidation of their

215

metabolites.

216

4. Overview of structural elucidation steps and strategies

SC

Although specific structural elucidation steps may be case dependent due to variations in

M AN U

217

RI PT

209

instrumentation and the experimental conditions, the overall steps include: 1) full scan to show

219

peaks of potential metabolites and their protonated/deprotonated molecules ([M+H]+ and [M–H]–

220

); 2) acquisition of product-ion spectra of [M+H]+ and [M–H]– based on CID; 3) molecular

221

formula assignment of [M+H]+ and [M–H]– and product ions if applicable; and 4) structural

222

elucidation based on product-ion spectral interpretation and authentic standard confirmation if

223

available. Overall workflow of elucidation is schemed in Figure 4.

TE D

218

Generally, real samples and controls were firstly scanned in positive and negative mode

225

across an appropriate m/z range. Peaks present in treated samples but absent in controls are

226

regarded as prospective peaks of the unknown metabolites. The selection of potential peaks of

227

interest may rely on either preliminary visual interpretation of relevant chromatograms or data

228

processing software such as XCMS [43]. Appropriate screening criteria including for example

229

peak area threshold were implemented to prioritize the list of potential peaks of interest. Ion

230

adducts and/or dimers/trimers were used to identify the most likely protonated/deprotonated

231

molecules.

AC C

EP

224

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

232

Molecular formulae of the protonated/deprotonated molecules were assessed based on accurate mass measurement on HRAM-MS. Several calculation criteria were applied to narrow

234

the number of possible molecular formulae, including an accuracy error threshold, upper limits

235

on the number of carbon/hydrogen/nitrogen, the nitrogen rule, isotope pattern and RDB, until

236

one molecular formula is derived. Thereafter, an option to mine the chemical structure of the

237

unknown compound is to search its molecular formula against known chemical structure

238

databases such as PubChem, Chemspider, and SciFinder [44]. Although each database is

239

incomplete, valuable information can still be drawn for ease of structural illustration. Otherwise,

240

the structure can be disclosed based on the following approaches.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

233

Protonated/deprotonated molecules of the unknown metabolites are subject to MSn

242

(multistage fragmentation of the protonated/deprotonated molecules to acquire product-ion

243

spectrum), if necessary, based on CID for further structural information. The structure of the

244

metabolites can be proposed based on product-ion spectral interpretation. One common and easy

245

approach to product-ion spectral interpretation is by referring to the product-ion mass

246

spectrometry data of existing literature and spectral libraries such as MassBank, METLIN, NIST

247

and Wiley or by comparison with fragmentation patterns of commercial standards, if available.

248

Besides, knowledge of CID fragmentation reactions (Section 3.1) and use of fragmentation

249

pathway predicting software help the interpretation. Two widely used commercially available

250

software packages are Mass Frontier and Mass Fragmenter [44]. The formula assignment of the

251

product ions based on HRAM-MS also greatly facilitates the structural elucidation. Another way

252

that helps structural elucidation is via comparison of protonated/deprotonated molecules of the

253

metabolites with that of a related parent compound itself. This strategy derives from the premise

254

that the initial metabolites conserve to some degree the basic skeleton of its parent compound.

AC C

EP

TE D

241

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

255

Mass shift between them implies certain transformation reactions. For instance, a +16 (Da) shift

256

in m/z value may indicate hydroxylation, +14 (Da) methylation, –2 (Da) dehydrogenation, +2

257

(Da) saturation, +18 (Da) hydration and –18 (Da) dehydration, etc. Notably, when routine MS analysis alone do not suffice to unravel the identity of an

RI PT

258

unknown compound, orthogonal techniques that can be readily performed on MS are employed

260

to facilitate structural elucidation. Therein, 2H or 13C isotopic labeling is a sagacious strategy

261

adopted. The location of modifications during the degradation and/or transformation process

262

could be inferred via comparison of the spectra between non-labeled and labeled parent

263

compounds. Hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange is another example. Hydrogen atoms attached

264

to heteroatoms (e.g., N, O and S) are easily exchanged by deuterium. Therefore, in a H/D

265

exchange event, investigators measured the m/z shift between a unknown metabolite and its

266

H/D-exchange counterpart to judge the presence of hydroxy (–OH), carboxylic acid (–COOH)

267

and amino (–NH2) functional groups in the metabolite structure. Other orthogonal techniques

268

such as derivatization and using model compounds are also feasible. Examples to illustrate the

269

structures of the degradation and transformation products are elaborated in the following part.

270

5. Applications in environmental samples

271

5.1 Triple-quadrupole MS (TQ-MS)

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

259

TQ features three quadrupoles where the first and third quadrupoles permit mass analysis and

273

the second allows CID. Generally, TQ is not an ideal tool for structural illustration due to its low

274

sensitively, low-mass resolution and accuracy in the scan mode whereby the molecular formulae

275

of the unknowns cannot be determined; rather, TQ is applied more for quantitative analysis in the

276

MRM mode which features high sensitivity. Nevertheless, due to the unavailability of more

277

powerful instrument under certain circumstances, TQ was still availed in a few studies to

AC C

272

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

tentatively identify the degradation and transformation products of progestagens and estrogens in

279

the environmental matrix [8, 45-49](Table 1). Full scan and product ion scan with TQ were

280

conducted in these studies to obtain the protonated or deprotonated molecules of the metabolites

281

and their fragmental information. The structures of the metabolites were tentatively proposed by

282

means of personal interpretation of the spectra and referring to literature and further confirmed

283

using authentic standards if available. The unequivocal structural elucidation, however, was

284

challenging without standards or other confirmation method. One thing to be notified is that to

285

manifest minor metabolites on full scan spectra which would be otherwise invisible if the

286

concentration of parent compound is low arising from the low sensitivity of TQ in scan mode,

287

parent compounds were usually fortified at much higher concentrations than environmentally-

288

relevant concentrations. In this case, the similarity in transformation pathways of parents cannot

289

be guaranteed for spiked concentrations with environmentally-relevant concentrations.

SC

M AN U

Apart from full scan and product ion scan, precursor-ion scan (PIS) and neutral-loss scan

TE D

290

RI PT

278

(NLS) [50] with TQ also help structural elucidation. PIS mode is used to look for the precursors

292

of a particular fragment ion. For example, Zhou et al. [51] applied PIS approach to search for

293

halogen-containing estrogens with halide ions as fragments. NLS is used to monitor an ion which

294

upon CID has a neutral loss with a mass matching the fixed m/z difference. NLS is especially

295

useful for screening metabolites of sulfate- and glucuronide-conjugated steroids which feature

296

common neutral losses of 80 (SO3) and 176 Da (C6H8O). These conjugates can also be screened

297

in PIS mode by the scan over all precursors that give rise to fragment ions at m/z 80 (SO3 –) and

298

m/z 97 (HSO4–) or m/z 175 (glucuronate) and m/z 113 (fragment of the glucuronide moiety) [18,

299

52]. However, PIS and NLS are mostly used for identification of new steroid metabolites [53] in

300

biological matrix but are rarely applied in environmental samples.

AC C

EP

291

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

301

With TQ, orthogonal techniques and other intelligent strategies were adopted to assist the identification. For example, Huber et al. [8] extrapolated the O3 oxidized products of 17α-

303

ethynylestradiol (EE2) by referring to two model compounds 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthol and

304

1-ethinyl-1-cyclohexanol, which represent, respectively, the reactive phenolic moiety and the

305

ethinyl group of EE2. The derived oxidation products of EE2 were identified using TQ, and the

306

characteristic neutral losses of deprotonated molecules ([M-H]–) of the oxidation products also

307

supported the putative structures. For example, loss of 44 (CO2), 46 (CH2O2) and 62 (CO2 + H2O)

308

likely suggested the presence of one carboxylic acid, α/ß-hydroxy acid and two carboxylic acid

309

functional groups in the structure, respectively [54, 55]. Elsewhere, Ma and Yates [49] employed

310

“pseudo-MS3” to tentatively identify the biodegradation products of 17ß-estradiol-3- glucuronide

311

and 17ß-estradiol-3-sulfate in riverine sediment. To apply “pseudo-MS3”, an increased de-

312

clustering voltage in ESI source was applied to produce in-source fragmentation of the

313

deprotonated molecules. One characteristic fragment with high response was selected for further

314

fragmentation in a collision cell of TQ. Tentatively proposed metabolites in the study included

315

hydroxylated products, keto derivatives and dehydrogenated products, among which several

316

products were confirmed using authentic standards and GC-MS after derivatization. In another

317

study on ligninase-mediated E2 removal [48], E2 lost one electron to generate an E2 free radical

318

which self-combined via coupling reactions to form dimers and trimers. Reaction sites in E2

319

molecules were proposed based on the computed charge and spin densities of the free radical.

320

5.2 IT-MS

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

321

RI PT

302

Similar to TQ-MS, drawbacks of IT-MS arising from low-mass accuracy and resolution do

322

not allow a molecular formula calculation. Yet the high full-scan sensitivity and MSn capabilities

323

render IT-MS a promising technique in structural elucidation of the degradation and

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

transformation products of environmental contaminants. The high full-scan sensitivity trait of IT-

325

MS may make avoidable the cumbersome steps to concentrate the analytes. In a MSn experiment,

326

selection of precursor ions, CID and product-ion scan are all performed in ion-trap, whereby a

327

high abundance of structurally-informative product ions are yielded. Intelligent identification

328

strategies, orthogonal information and electronic theory were also used in some studies to verify

329

the metabolite structures proposed based on MSn. For example, in a photodegradation study of

330

EE2 [56], the structures of the intermediates were determined via comparison of obtained MS4

331

data with prior knowledge of EE2 photocatalytic mechanisms. The hydroxylated products were

332

proposed to be the initial metabolites, arising from ˙OH attack of EE2; whereas the reaction site,

333

namely the location of the hydroxyl group, was predicted based on FED calculation. In another

334

example with characterization of an EE2 biotransformation product, MSn data suggested the

335

presence of a hydroxyl group, an aldehyde group, and a carboxylic group in the structure [57].

336

This product derivatized with dansyl chloride in the same manner as EE2 (reaction site is located

337

at phenol group), in support of the preservation of the phenolic group of the parent EE2 after

338

transformation. Furthermore, the early elution of the product on reversed-phase LC

339

chromatograph suggested the presence of a polar group such as a carboxylic moiety. Such

340

polarity oriented judgement was also stated in other studies [11, 58].

341

5.3 TOF-MS and Q-TOF-MS

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

342

RI PT

324

High full-scan sensitivity, high-mass resolution and accuracy provided by TOF-MS make it a

343

significant asset for molecular formula definition of analytes. Single TOF-MS has been proved

344

useful for structural disclosure for oligomers or polymers, which are common transformation

345

products of estrogens in enzyme-mediated systems [59, 60]. Nonetheless, since TOF-MS alone is

346

not able to provide CID, NLS and PIS, additional structural illustration strategies and analytical

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

tools are needed for further confirmation. For example, to determine the structure of EE2

348

metabolites by an advanced catalytic oxidation process [61], the molecular formulae of the

349

oxidized metabolites were assigned by TOF-MS, confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance

350

(NMR) and verified by FED calculation.

RI PT

347

During the past few years, a Q-TOF hybrid increasingly becomes a universal tool in

352

environmental analysis. The so-called hybrid instrument usually means that the two different

353

analyzers are tandem in space. Q-TOF can be regarded as a modified TQ with the third

354

quadrupole replaced by TOF analyzer. Each analyzer alone has disadvantages, while a hybrid-

355

mass system is able to integrate the merits of the two. Q-TOF hybrid mass spectrometer inherits

356

acquisition modes from TQ except MRM, allowing a molecular formula calculated for not only

357

precursor ions but also product ions. Wang et al. [62] confirmed the formation of oligomers as

358

the major phototransformation products of estrogens in a Mn (Ⅲ)-mediated system based on

359

accurate mass measurement and CID spectral interpretation. Identified oligomers were formed

360

via self-coupling reaction of E2 or E1 and cross-coupling reaction of E2 and E1. The same

361

approaches were applied by Wang et al. [63] to evaluate the photodegradation products of E2 on

362

silica gel and natural soil; therein hydroxylated products and similar oligomers were identified.

363

In both studies, DFT calculations were carried out to provide theoretical insights into the

364

potential reaction sites of the substrates (e.g., hydroxylation, oligomerization, and C-C bond

365

cleavage). In a study to evaluate the photolysis by-products of E1by Q-TOF, Souissi et al. [64]

366

employed two model compounds, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphtol and 2-methylcy-clopentanone

367

which represent ring A/B and ring D of E1, respectively, to deduce the possible structure of E1

368

photolysis by-products. Based on CID mass spectra and accurate mass measurement, the by-

369

products were proposed to be hydroxylated products and dimers. Importantly, by measuring the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

351

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

mass shift of the protonated molecules and their fragmented product ions between E1and E1-D4

371

(labeled at C2, C4 and C16) photolysis by-products, the location of reaction site (e.g.,

372

hydroxylation and polymerization) was tentatively localized. In a denitrifying media incubated

373

with both testosterone and 2,3,4-13C-labeled testosterone (13C labeled at C-2, C-3 and C-4), a

374

13

375

suggested two 13C-labeled carbons from the parent were lost during the formation of this C17

376

intermediate. Eventually, the two lost 13C-labeled carbons were assumed to be C-3 and C-4 via

377

plausible deduction from the structure of one upstream intermediate. Table 1 listed a few more

378

studies on Q-TOF-aided metabolite identification in environmental samples.

379

5.4 Linear trap quadrupole (LTQ)-Orbitrap

SC

C-labeled intermediate with 17 carbons was identified [65]. TOF-MS accurate mass calculation

M AN U

380

RI PT

370

To perform a LTQ-Orbitrap analysis, the spectrometer was switched between Orbitrap-MS for high-resolution full scan data and LTQ-MS/MS for low-resolution fragmentation data (MSn).

382

With the former they are able to measure a molecular formula of the precursor and fragment ions

383

with high confidence while the later enables a structure tentatively proposed. Examples of LTQ-

384

Orbitrap application are also listed in Table 1. Hom-Diaz et al. [66] built an in-house library

385

based on the accurate mass of the transformation products of E2 and EE2 described in the

386

literature. By comparing the LTQ-Orbitrap data with that in the library, major transformation

387

products of E2 and EE2 by microalgae were determined to be hydroxylated and dialdehyde

388

products. Using the similar approach, Cole et al. [67] indicated that 17α-trenbolone and

389

trendione were majorly bio-transformed to dehydrogenated and hydroxylated products.

390

Elsewhere, Kolodziej et al. [11] tentatively proposed the structure of some photo-transformation

391

products of 17α/ß-trenbolone and trendione in the similar way. Furthermore, additional

392

information, NMR and UV/Vis data for instance, were appended in this study for further

AC C

EP

TE D

381

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

verification and/or confirmation. NMR data confirmed three proposed structures. The blue shift

394

in UV/Vis spectra of the phototransformation products from that of the parents suggested the

395

disruption of the conjugated 4,9,11 -system of the parents upon photolysis, congruent with the

396

proposed structures.

397

RI PT

393

Recently, LTQ-Orbitrap proved itself an able tool in the investigation of potential

biologically-active by-products generated during the water treatment processes like ozonation

399

and chlorination. As an example, Gervais et al. [58] characterized eight halogenation and

400

hydroxylation products of EE2 during the chlorination of drinking water. The assigned formulae

401

suggested all the major by-products should have a structure similar to their parent EE2. Isotope

402

ratio calculation implied that chloride and bromide were added to the structure. MSn

403

fragmentation patterns indicated that halogen atoms and the additional hydroxyl group were

404

located on the A-ring. The near concurrent but late elution of halogenation products relative to

405

that of EE2 also supported the A-ring substituted reaction because the presence of halogenated

406

atoms on the A-ring would decrease the polarity of the phenolic group and thus promote the

407

retention of the by-products on reversed-phase separation column. In another study, Bourgin et

408

al. [68] characterized four major ozonation by-products of esrone-3-sulfate via a combination of

409

MSn and H/D exchange approaches. The calculated molecular formulae and changes in m/z

410

during the H/D exchange experiment determined whether a carbonyl group or a hydroxyl group

411

was attached to the parent during ozonation treatment. MSn spectral interpretation provided

412

further hint on the location of the carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. Finally, in-house synthesized or

413

commercially available standards further confirmed the structure.

414

5.5 Orbitrap, Quadrople-Linear Ion-Trap and LTQ-FT-ICR

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

398

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

415

Apart from the above-stated mass spectrometers, Table 1 also listed examples of application of Orbitrap [69] and LTQ-FT-ICR [70] on estrogen metabolite characterization. Here, orbitrap

417

functions similarly to a sole TOF analyzer, while LTQ-FT-ICR was analogous to LTQ-Orbitrap.

418

6. Concluding remarks

RI PT

416

Low-mass accuracy and resolution MS like TQ and IT-MS hitherto still play a role in the

420

tentative identification of unknowns, while to achieve unambiguous identification the authentic

421

standards are essential. The unavailability of the standards substantially compromises their

422

qualitative capability. The development of HRAM-MS has greatly aided metabolite

423

identification arising from their accurate mass measurement capacity. As a result, a hybrid MS

424

system that offers accurate mass data and CID fragmentation data has been proven to be a

425

powerful tool in structural elucidation of steroid hormone metabolites in the environmental

426

samples. In the application examples present here (Table 1), orthogonal techniques and spectral

427

interpretation skills manifest the effectiveness of the hybrid MS systems.

M AN U

TE D

428

SC

419

The success of structural elucidation of unknowns relies not only on instrumentation but also on better software algorithms, especially those for screening and fragmentation pathway

430

prediction of the unknowns, which are not yet fully developed. Software with sufficient selection

431

and filtering parameters is necessary to ensure a priori selection of interested peaks and

432

elimination of false-positive and false-negative results. Advanced software solutions for

433

fragmentation pathway prediction need to be developed to consider rearrangement reactions [31].

434

Additionally, since quantum mechanical approaches with DFT for example were often employed

435

to provide theoretical insights into the fragmentation pathways, better computational resources

436

are also necessary for optimum electron density calculation.

AC C

EP

429

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

437

Summing up, this review aims to provide the progress in application of LC-MS on structural elucidation of steroid hormone degradation and transformation products in the environment.

439

Structural elucidation steps together with fragmentation pathways of pronated and deprotonated

440

molecules are also discussed. The information provided in this review is useful for future

441

identification of novel metabolites of other environmental emerging contaminants. However, one

442

need to bear in mind that structural elucidation based on routine MS analysis is sometimes

443

inadequate to assign the identity of the unknown; alternatively, orthogonal techniques are needed

444

to assist identification. Also, gaining as much as possible knowledge on experimental parameters

445

and physiochemical properties of the parent compounds is pivot for identity assignment of novel

446

metabolites.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

438

447

Acknowledgement

448

This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under

EP

TE D

Project No: 2036-12130-011-00D

AC C

449

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

References [1] Y.Q. Liang, G.Y. Huang, S.S. Liu, J.L. Zhao, Y.Y. Yang, X.W. Chen, F. Tian, Y.X. Jiang, G.G. Ying, Long-term exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of progesterone and norgestrel affects sex

RI PT

differentiation in zebrafish (Danio rerio), Aquat Toxicol, 160 (2015) 172-179.

[2] L.G. Parks, C.S. Lambright, E.F. Orlando, L.J. Guillette, G.T. Ankley, L.E. Gray, Masculinization of female mosquitofish in kraft mill effluent-contaminated Fenholloway River water is associated with

SC

androgen receptor agonist activity, Toxicol Sci, 62 (2001) 257-267.

[3] S. Jobling, M. Nolan, C.R. Tyler, G. Brighty, J.P. Sumpter, Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish,

M AN U

Environ Sci Technol, 32 (1998) 2498-2506.

[4] R.B. Young, T. Borch, Sources, Presence, Analysis, and Fate of Steroid Sex Hormones in Freshwater Ecosystems–Areview, reproduction, 1 (2009) 3.

[5] H. Fang, W.D. Tong, W.S. Branham, C.L. Moland, S.L. Dial, H.X. Hong, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, W. Owens, D.M. Sheehan, Study of 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals for binding to the

TE D

androgen receptor, Chem Res Toxicol, 16 (2003) 1338-1358.

[6] M. Kuster, M.J.L. de Alda, D. Barceló, Estrogens and progestogens in wastewater, sludge, sediments, and soil, Water Pollution, Springer2005, pp. 1-24.

EP

[7] G.M. Anstead, K.E. Carlson, J.A. Katzenellenbogen, The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structureestrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site, Steroids, 62

AC C

(1997) 268-303.

[8] M.M. Huber, T.A. Ternes, U. von Gunten, Removal of estrogenic activity and formation of oxidation products during ozonation of 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, Environ Sci Technol, 38 (2004) 5177-5186. [9] V.K. Turan, R.I. Sanchez, J.J. Li, S.A. Li, K.R. Reuhl, P.E. Thomas, A.H. Conney, M.A. Gallo, F.C. Kauffman, S. Mesia-Vela, The effects of steroidal estrogens in ACI rat mammary carcinogenesis: 17 beta-estradiol, 2-hydroxyestradiol, 4-hydroxyestradiol, 16 alpha-hydroxyestradiol, and 4-hydroxyestrone, J Endocrinol, 183 (2004) 91-99.

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[10] N. Getoff, M. Gerschpacher, J. Hartmann, J.C. Huber, H. Schittl, R.M. Quint, The 4-hydroxyestrone: Electron emission, formation of secondary metabolites and mechanisms of carcinogenesis, J Photoch Photobio B, 98 (2010) 20-24.

RI PT

[11] E.P. Kolodziej, S. Qu, K.L. Forsgren, S.A. Long, J.B. Gloer, G.D. Jones, D. Schlenk, J. Baltrusaitis, D.M. Cwiertny, Identification and Environmental Implications of Photo-Transformation Products of Trenbolone Acetate Metabolites, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 5031-5041.

SC

[12] J.L. Little, C.D. Cleven, S.D. Brown, Identification of "Known Unknowns" Utilizing Accurate Mass Data and Chemical Abstracts Service Databases, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 22 (2011) 348-359.

M AN U

[13] Z.L. Fan, S.M. Wu, H. Chang, J.Y. Hu, Behaviors of Glucocorticoids, Androgens and Progestogens in a Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant: Comparison to Estrogens, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 27252733.

[14] T. Borch, J.G. Davis, Y.-Y. Yang, R.B. Young, Occurrence of steroid sex hormones in the Cache la Poudre River: and pathways for the removal in the environment, Completion report (Colorado Water

TE D

Institute); no. 216, DOI (2009).

[15] F.F. Scherr, A.K. Sarmah, H.J. Di, K.C. Cameron, Degradation and metabolite formation of 17 betaestradiol-3-sulphate in New Zealand pasture soils, Environ Int, 35 (2009) 291-297.

EP

[16] S.L. Shrestha, F.X.M. Casey, H. Hakk, D.J. Smith, G. Padmanabhan, Fate and Transformation of an Estrogen Conjugate and Its Metabolites in Agricultural Soils, Environ Sci Technol, 46 (2012) 11047-

AC C

11053.

[17] T. Kosjek, E. Heath, M. Petrovic, D. Barcelo, Mass spectrometry for identifying pharmaceutical biotransformation products in the environment, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 26 (2007) 1076-1085. [18] A. Gentili, S. Marchese, D. Perret, MS techniques for analyzing phenols, their metabolites and transformation products of environmental interest, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 27 (2008) 888-903. [19] Y. Pico, D. Barcelo, Transformation products of emerging contaminants in the environment and high-resolution mass spectrometry: a new horizon, Anal Bioanal Chem, 407 (2015) 6257-6273.

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[20] A.A. Bletsou, J. Jeon, J. Hollender, E. Archontaki, N.S. Thomaidis, Targeted and non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric workflows for identification of transformation products of emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment, Trac-Trend Anal Chem, 66 (2015) 32-44.

RI PT

[21] M. Krauss, H. Singer, J. Hollender, LC-high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to the identification of unknowns, Anal Bioanal Chem, 397 (2010) 943-951.

[22] S. Barbic, M. Biosic, I. Skoric, Transformation Products of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment:

SC

Formation and Analysis, Curr Org Chem, 22 (2018) 987-1004.

[23] A. Aguera, M.J.M. Bueno, A.R. Fernandez-Alba, New trends in the analytical determination of

M AN U

emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters, Environ Sci Pollut R, 20 (2013) 3496-3515.

[24] J. Acena, S. Stampachiacchiere, S. Perez, D. Barcelo, Advances in liquid chromatography-highresolution mass spectrometry for quantitative and qualitative environmental analysis, Anal Bioanal Chem, 407 (2015) 6289-6299.

TE D

[25] E. De Hoffmann, J. Charette, V. Stroobant, Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications, 1997. [26] W.M. Niessen, Interpretation of MS-MS mass spectra of drugs and pesticides, John Wiley & Sons2017.

R111. 009407.

EP

[27] M. Wilm, Principles of electrospray ionization, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, DOI (2011) mcp.

AC C

[28] M. Llorca, S. Rodríguez-Mozaz, State-of-the-art of screening methods for the rapid identification of chemicals in drinking water, DOI (2013). [29] J.M. Wells, S.A. McLuckey, Collision-induced dissociation (CID) of peptides and proteins, Method Enzymol, 402 (2005) 148-185. [30] A.R. Johnson, E.E. Carlson, Collision-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry: A Powerful Tool for Natural Product Structure Elucidation, Anal Chem, 87 (2015) 10668-10678.

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[31] F.Y. Guan, L.R. Soma, Y. Luo, C.E. Uboh, S. Peterman, Collision-induced dissociation pathways of anabolic steroids by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 17 (2006) 477-489.

RI PT

[32] D.P. Demarque, A.E.M. Crotti, R. Vessecchi, J.L.C. Lopes, N.P. Lopes, Fragmentation reactions using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: an important tool for the structural elucidation and characterization of synthetic and natural products, Nat Prod Rep, 33 (2016) 432-455.

SC

[33] J. Adams, Charge-Remote Fragmentations - Analytical Applications and Fundamental-Studies, Mass Spectrom Rev, 9 (1990) 141-186.

M AN U

[34] J. Adams, M.L. Gross, Charge-Remote Fragmentations of Closed-Shell Ions - a Thermolytic Analogy, J Am Chem Soc, 111 (1989) 435-440.

[35] M.L. Gross, Charge-Remote Fragmentations - Method, Mechanism and Applications, Int J Mass Spectrom, 118 (1992) 137-165.

[36] S. Bourcier, C. Poisson, Y. Souissi, S. Kinani, S. Bouchonnet, M. Sablier, Elucidation of the

TE D

decomposition pathways of protonated and deprotonated estrone ions: application to the identification of photolysis products, Rapid Commun Mass Sp, 24 (2010) 2999-3010. [37] Y.K. Sun, C.G. Gu, X.M. Liu, W.Z. Liang, P. Yao, J.L. Bolton, R.B. van Breemen, Ultrafiltration

EP

tandem mass spectrometry of estrogens for characterization of structure and affinity for human estrogen receptors, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 16 (2005) 271-279.

AC C

[38] L. Tedmon, J.S. Barnes, H.P. Nguyen, K.A. Schug, Differentiating Isobaric Steroid Hormone Metabolites Using Multi-Stage Tandem Mass Spectrometry, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 24 (2013) 399-409. [39] W.J. Barr, T. Yi, D. Aga, O. Acevedo, W.F. Harper, Using Electronic Theory To Identify Metabolites Present in 17α-Ethinylestradiol Biotransformation Pathways, Environ Sci Technol, 46 (2012) 760-768. [40] S.G. Musharraf, A. Ali, N.T. Khan, M. Yousuf, M.I. Choudhary, Atta-ur-Rahman, Tandem mass spectrometry approach for the investigation of the steroidal metabolism: Structure-fragmentation

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

relationship (SFR) in anabolic steroids and their metabolites by ESI-MS/MS analysis, Steroids, 78 (2013) 171-181. [41] F.Y. Guan, C.E. Uboh, L.R. Soma, Y.W. You, Y. Liu, X.Q. Li, Correlation of product ion profiles

RI PT

with molecular structures of androgenic and anabolic steroids in ESI MS/MS, J Mass Spectrom, 45 (2010) 1261-1269.

[42] O.J. Pozo, P. Van Eenoo, K. Deventer, S. Grimalt, J.V. Sancho, F. Hernandez, F.T. Delbeke,

SC

Collision-induced dissociation of 3-keto anabolic steroids and related compounds after electrospray ionization. Considerations for structural elucidation, Rapid Commun Mass Sp, 22 (2008) 4009-4024.

M AN U

[43] C.A. Smith, E.J. Want, G. O'Maille, R. Abagyan, G. Siuzdak, XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using Nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification, Anal Chem, 78 (2006) 779-787.

[44] T. De Vijlder, D. Valkenborg, F. Lemiere, E.P. Romijn, K. Laukens, F. Cuyckens, A tutorial in small molecule identification via electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: The practical art of structural

TE D

elucidation, Mass Spectrom Rev, 37 (2018) 607-629.

[45] F.Q. Peng, G.G. Ying, B. Yang, S. Liu, H.J. Lai, Y.S. Liu, Z.F. Chen, G.J. Zhou, Biotransformation of progesterone and norgestrel by two freshwater microalgae (Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella

EP

pyrenoidosa): Transformation kinetics and products identification, Chemosphere, 95 (2014) 581-588. [46] S. Liu, G.G. Ying, Y.S. Liu, F.Q. Peng, L.Y. He, Degradation of Norgestrel by Bacteria from

AC C

Activated Sludge: Comparison to Progesterone, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 10266-10276. [47] Z. Frontistis, C. Drosou, K. Tyrovola, D. Mantzavinos, D. Fatta-Kassinos, D. Venieri, N.P. Xekoukoulotakis, Experimental and Modeling Studies of the Degradation of Estrogen Hormones in Aqueous TiO2 Suspensions under Simulated Solar Radiation, Ind Eng Chem Res, 51 (2012) 16552-16563. [48] L.A. Mao, Q.G. Huang, Q. Luo, J.H. Lu, X. Yang, S.X. Gao, Ligninase-mediated removal of 17 beta-estradiol from water in the presence of natural organic matter: Efficiency and pathways, Chemosphere, 80 (2010) 469-473.

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[49] L. Ma, S.R. Yates, Degradation and metabolite formation of 17ß-estradiol-3-glucuronide and 17ßestradiol-3-sulphate in river water and sediment, Water Res, 139 (2018) 1-9. [50] M. Maekawa, M. Shimada, T. Iida, J. Goto, N. Mano, Tandem mass spectrometric characterization

RI PT

of bile acids and steroid conjugates based on low-energy collision-induced dissociation, Steroids, 80 (2014) 80-91.

[51] Y. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Gao, S.Y. Pang, J. Ma, J.B. Duan, Q. Guo, J. Li, Y. Yang, Oxidation of steroid

SC

estrogens by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and effect of bromide and chloride ions: Kinetics, products, and modeling, Water Res, 138 (2018) 56-66.

M AN U

[52] A. Fabregat, O.J. Pozo, J. Marcos, J. Segura, R. Ventura, Use of LC-MS/MS for the Open Detection of Steroid Metabolites Conjugated with Glucuronic Acid, Anal Chem, 85 (2013) 5005-5014. [53] J. Marcos, O.J. Pozo, Current LC-MS methods and procedures applied to the identification of new steroid metabolites, J Steroid Biochem, 162 (2016) 41-56.

[54] J.L. Kerwin, J.J. Torvik, Identification of monohydroxy fatty acids by electrospray mass

TE D

spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem, 237 (1996) 56-64. [55] H. Frauendorf, R. Herzschuh, Application of high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometry for identification of carboxylic acids containing several carboxyl groups from aqueous

EP

solutions, Eur Mass Spectrom, 4 (1998) 269-278.

[56] W.L. Sun, S. Li, J.X. Mai, J.R. Ni, Initial photocatalytic degradation intermediates/pathways of 17

AC C

alpha-ethynylestradiol: Effect of pH and methanol, Chemosphere, 81 (2010) 92-99. [57] J. Skotnicka-Pitak, W.O. Khunjar, N.G. Love, D.S. Aga, Characterization of Metabolites Formed During the Biotransformation of 17 alpha-Ethinylestradiol by Nitrosomonas europaea in Batch and Continuous Flow Bioreactors, Environ Sci Technol, 43 (2009) 3549-3555. [58] G. Gervais, E. Bichon, J.P. Antignac, F. Monteau, G. Leroy, L. Barritaud, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, B. Le Bizec, Differential global profiling as a new analytical strategy for revealing micropollutant treatment by-products: Application to ethinylestradiol and chlorination water treatment, Chemosphere, 83 (2011) 1553-1559. 28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[59] L. Lloret, G. Eibes, M.T. Moreira, G. Feijoo, J.M. Lema, Removal of Estrogenic Compounds from Filtered Secondary Wastewater Effluent in a Continuous Enzymatic Membrane Reactor. Identification of Biotransformation Products, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 4536-4543.

RI PT

[60] R. Taboada-Puig, G. Eibes, L. Lloret, T.A. Lu-Chau, G. Feijoo, M.T. Moreira, J.M. Lema, Fostering the action of versatile peroxidase as a highly efficient biocatalyst for the removal of endocrine disrupting compounds, New Biotechnol, 33 (2016) 187-195.

SC

[61] J.L. Chen, S. Ravindran, S. Swift, L.J. Wright, N. Singhal, Catalytic oxidative degradation of 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol by Fe-III-TAML/H2O2: Estrogenicities of the products of partial, and extensive

M AN U

oxidation, Water Res, 46 (2012) 6309-6318.

[62] X.H. Wang, J.Y. Yao, S.Y. Wang, X.X. Pan, R.Y. Xiao, Q.G. Huang, Z.Y. Wang, R.J. Qu, Phototransformation of estrogens mediated by Mn(III), not by reactive oxygen species, in the presence of humic acids, Chemosphere, 201 (2018) 224-233.

[63] S. Wang, X. Wang, C. Li, X. Xu, Z. Wei, Z. Wang, R. Qu, Photodegradation of 17β-estradiol on

TE D

silica gel and natural soil by UV treatment, Environ Pollut, 242 (2018) 1236-1244. [64] Y. Souissi, S. Bourcier, S. Bouchonnet, C. Genty, M. Sablier, Estrone direct photolysis: By-product identification using LC-Q-TOF, Chemosphere, 87 (2012) 185-193.

EP

[65] P.H. Wang, C.P. Yu, T.H. Lee, C.W. Lin, W. Ismail, S.P. Wey, A.T. Kuo, Y.R. Chiang, Anoxic Androgen Degradation by the Denitrifying Bacterium Sterolibacterium denitrificans via the 2,3-seco

AC C

Pathway, Appl Environ Microb, 80 (2014) 3442-3452. [66] A. Hom-Diaz, M. Llorca, S. Rodriguez-Mozaz, T. Vicent, D. Barcelo, P. Blanquez, Microalgae cultivation on wastewater digestate: beta-estradiol and 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol degradation and transformation products identification, J Environ Manage, 155 (2015) 106-113. [67] E.A. Cole, S.A. McBride, K.C. Kimbrough, J. Lee, E.A. Marchand, D.M. Cwiertny, E.P. Kolodziej, Rates and product identification for trenbolone acetate metabolite biotransformation under aerobic conditions, Environ Toxicol Chem, 34 (2015) 1472-1484.

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[68] M. Bourgin, G. Gervais, E. Bichon, J.-P. Antignac, F. Monteau, G. Leroy, L. Barritaud, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, B. Le Bizec, Differential chemical profiling to identify ozonation byproducts of estrone-sulfate and first characterization of estrogenicity in generated drinking water, Water

RI PT

Res, 47 (2013) 3791-3802. [69] K. Sun, Q. Luo, Y. Gao, Q. Huang, Laccase-catalyzed reactions of 17β-estradiol in the presence of humic acid: Resolved by high-resolution mass spectrometry in combination with 13C labeling,

SC

Chemosphere, 145 (2016) 394-401.

[70] S. Karim, S. Bae, D. Greenwood, K. Hanna, N. Singhal, Degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol by nano

M AN U

zero valent iron under different pH and dissolved oxygen levels, Water Res, 125 (2017) 32-41. [71] N.S. Rannulu, R.B. Cole, Novel Fragmentation Pathways of Anionic Adducts of Steroids Formed by Electrospray Anion Attachment Involving Regioselective Attachment, Regiospecific Decompositions, Charge-Induced Pathways, and Ion-Dipole Complex Intermediates, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 23 (2012) 1558-1568.

TE D

[72] K.M. Wooding, R.M. Barkley, J.A. Hankin, C.A. Johnson, A.P. Bradford, N. Santoro, R.C. Murphy, Mechanism of Formation of the Major Estradiol Product Ions Following Collisional Activation of the Molecular Anion in a Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, J Am Soc Mass Spectr, 24 (2013) 1451-

EP

1455.

[73] X.Y. Ma, C. Zhang, J. Deng, Y.L. Song, Q.S. Li, Y.P. Guo, C. Li, Simultaneous Degradation of

AC C

Estrone, 17 beta-Estradiol and 17 alpha-Ethinyl Estradiol in an Aqueous UV/H2O2 System, Int J Env Res Pub He, 12 (2015) 12016-12029. [74] W.O. Khunjar, S.A. Mackintosh, J. Skotnicka-Pitak, S. Baik, D.S. Aga, N.G. Love, Elucidating the Relative Roles of Ammonia Oxidizing and Heterotrophic Bacteria during the Biotransformation of 17 alpha-Ethinylestradiol and Trimethoprim, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 3605-3612. [75] P. Mazellier, L. Méité, J.D. Laat, Photodegradation of the steroid hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in dilute aqueous solution, Chemosphere, 73 (2008) 1216-1223.

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[76] L. Méité, B.D. Soro, N.K. Aboua, V. Mambo, K.S. Traoré, P. Mazellier, J. De Laat, Qualitative Determination of Photodegradation Products of Progesterone and Testosterone in Aqueous Solution, Am J Anal Chem, 7 (2016) 22.

RI PT

[77] Q. Yu, J. Geng, H. Huo, K. Xu, H. Huang, H. Hu, H. Ren, Bioaugmentated activated sludge degradation of progesterone: Kinetics and mechanism, Chem Eng J, 352 (2018) 214-224.

[78] L. Barritaud, G. Leroy, M. Chachignon, V. Ingrand, P. Roche, E. Bichon, G. Gervais, M. Bourgin,

estrone sulfate, Water Sci Tech-W Sup, 13 (2013) 1302-1308.

SC

J.P. Antignac, F. Monteau, B. Le Bizec, Identification of treatment by-products of the ozonation of

M AN U

[79] M. Fahrbach, M. Krauss, A. Preiss, H.P.E. Kohler, J. Hollender, Anaerobic testosterone degradation in Steroidobacter denitrificans - Identification of transformation products, Environ Pollut, 158 (2010) 2572-2581.

[80] P.A. Segura, P. Kaplan, V. Yargeau, Identification and structural elucidation of ozonation transformation products of estrone, Chem Cent J, 7 (2013).

TE D

[81] J.O. Ojoghoro, A.J. Chaudhary, P. Campo, J.P. Sumpter, M.D. Scrimshaw, Progesterone potentially degrades to potent androgens in surface waters, Sci Total Environ, 579 (2017) 1876-1884. [82] J.H. Li, Y. Zhang, Q.G. Huang, H.H. Shi, Y. Yang, S.X. Gao, L. Mao, X. Yang, Degradation of

EP

organic pollutants mediated by extracellular peroxidase in simulated sunlit humic waters: A case study with 17 beta-estradiol, J Hazard Mater, 331 (2017) 123-131.

AC C

[83] Y.L. Chen, H.Y. Fu, T.H. Lee, C.J. Shih, L. Huang, Y.S. Wang, W. Ismail, Y.R. Chiang, Estrogen Degraders and Estrogen Degradation Pathway Identified in an Activated Sludge, Appl Environ Microb, 84 (2018).

[84] Y.Y. Yang, L.P. Pereyra, R.B. Young, K.F. Reardon, T. Borch, Testosterone-Mineralizing Culture Enriched from Swine Manure: Characterization of Degradation Pathways and Microbial Community Composition, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 6879-6886. [85] R.B. Young, D.E. Latch, D.B. Mawhinney, T.H. Nguyen, J.C.C. Davis, T. Borch, Direct Photodegradation of Androstenedione and Testosterone in Natural Sunlight: Inhibition by Dissolved 31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Organic Matter and Reduction of Endocrine Disrupting Potential, Environ Sci Technol, 47 (2013) 84168424. [86] L.H. Shan, Y. Li, Y.J. Chen, M.H. Yin, J.J. Huang, Z.Z. Zhang, X.F. Shi, H.M. Liu, Microbial

RI PT

hydroxylation of 17-estradiol by Penicillium brevicompactum, Biocatal Biotransfor, 34 (2016) 137-143. [87] S. Larcher, G. Delbès, B. Robaire, V. Yargeau, Degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol by ozonation — Identification of the by-products and assessment of their estrogenicity and toxicity, Environ Int, 39 (2012)

SC

66-72.

[88] Y.L. Chen, C.P. Yu, T.H. Lee, K.S. Goh, K.H. Chu, P.H. Wang, W. Ismail, C.J. Shih, Y.R. Chiang,

AC C

EP

TE D

Cell Chem Biol, 24 (2017) 712-+.

M AN U

Biochemical Mechanisms and Catabolic Enzymes Involved in Bacterial Estrogen Degradation Pathways,

32

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure captions: Figure 1. Steroid nomenclature and structures of major steroid hormones investigated in

RI PT

literature. Figure 2. Charge-remote (outlined by dash square) and charge-induced fragmentation pathways of deprotonated 17ß-estradiol (a), protonated 17ß-estradiol (b) and protonated boldenone (c).

SC

Date are adapted from and modified based on [31, 36, 71, 72].

Figure 3. CID spectra (adapted from [37]) of deprotonated equilin (a), 17ß-equilin (b) and 17ß-

M AN U

estradiol and proposed formation pathways of selected product ions.

AC C

EP

TE D

Figure 4. Overall workflow for structural elucidation of transformation metabolites.

33

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

18 11

19 1

12

C 9

10

B

A

16

15

7

5

4

8

14

6

OH

O

H

OH

H

OH

H

Estrogen H

H

H

H

HO

Estrone

OH

OH H H

H

Progesterone

O

H

H

H

H

O

Testosterone

Androstenedione

OH

Anabolic steroids

OH

H

EP

H H

O

H

TE D

H O

H

H

O

Trenbolone

AC C

Boldenone

H

Levonorgestrel

Norethindrone

OH

Androgen

H

H

O

O

O

H

M AN U

H

H

H

Figure 1.

34

H

Ethynylestradiol

Estriol

O

H

H

HO

HO

17 -Estradiol

Progestagen

H

OH

H

SC

H HO

RI PT

R1

17

D

2 3

R2

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

a. -

m/z 145 O

-

H

m/z 143 O

OH

-

-H2O O

OH

m/z 271 O

-

RI PT

H

m/z 253

H

m/z 271 O

OH

OH

-

O

-

-

O

m/z 271

O

m/z 239

M AN U

m/z 271

OH

OH

OH

OH

SC

-CH3OH

13 17

-

-

H

-

-

O

O

O

O

14

14

15

TE D

15

O

-

m/z 183

b. OH2+

+ Transfer

OH

OH

AC C

c.

OH

OH

m/z 287

OH

m/z 255

14

16

15

O

OH

17

H

13

m/z 271

OH

H OH

+ OH

H

m/z 255

m/z 255

OH

m/z 159

OH OH

+ H OH

m/z 287

m/z 271

13

OH

OH

+

+

13

+

OH

m/z 255

m/z 273

-

H

O

+

of the methyl group

EP

-H2O

+

OH

17

17

m/z 271

16

15

-

H16

O

16

14

m/z 271

m/z 271

m/z 271

m/z 271

16

14 15

m/z 287

rH OH

Figure 2.

35

H -H O 2 +

m/z 287

+

m/z 153

+ +

m/z 135

m/z 135

AC C

EP

Figure 3.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

36

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Sample preparation

Elemental composition assignment

Match of product ion spectrum with parallel data in database or literature

Interpretation of product ions and proposal of fragmentation pathways

M AN U

Structure searching in database

SC

Screening for “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”

RI PT

Full scan and product ion scan analysis

Using orthogonal techniques and/or electronic theory to assist identification or confirm the results

AC C

EP

Figure 4.

TE D

Confirmation using authentic standards if available

37

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Structural elucidation and identification of degradation and transformation products of steroid hormones in the environment based on laboratory studies

EE2

E2, EE2 Progesterone, testosterone EE2

Progesterone 17α-TBOH, 17ß-

TBOH, TBO

MS analyzer

One intermediate was characterized 4-OH-EE2, sulfo-EE2

Biotransformation in the UV/H2O2 system Biotransformation by ammonia oxidizing bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria Photodegradation

ESI

IT

ESI

IT

APCI

IT

Photodegradation

APCI

IT

Transformation by nano zero valent iron in buffered solution

ESI

LTQ-FT ICR

Biodegradation by activated sludge from WWTP Direct photolysis

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

Photodegradation

Hydroxylated phenolic- or quinone-type compounds Isomerization, enolization, oxidation and hydration Hydrogenation, hydroxylation, radical coupling Dehydrogenation, saturation, ring-cleavage Hydroxylated and dialdehyde products

Comments on identification strategies

RI PT

Ion source ESI

IT

The structures of the intermediates were deducted on the basis of LC-MS data and the prior knowledge of photocatalytic mechanisms, with further identification 2 3 4 and verification by LC-MS , MS , and MS Referring to prior data of parallel studies

SC

E1, E2, EE2

Degradation/transformation type

M AN U

EE2

Major transformation products/reaction ·OH or ·OOH induced hydroxylation and decarboxylation reaction

TE D

Parent compound

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

E1, hydroxylated and dialdehyde products

Degradation by cultivated algae

17α-TBOH, 17ß-

Dehydrogenation, hydroxylation

Biotransformation

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

TBOH, TBO E1-3S

Hydroxylation

Ozonation in river water

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

EE2

Halogenation and hydroxylation on the A-ring Carbonylation, hydroxylation

Chlorination in drinking water

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

Ozonation

ESI

LTQ-Orbitrap

Dehydrogenation, hydrogenation Presence of carboxylic acid and hydroxyl group Oligomers

Anaerobic biodegradation

APCI

LTQ-Orbitrap

Ozonation transformation

APCI

LTQ-Orbitrap

Laccase-catalyzed transformation in

ESI

Orbitrap

E1-3S Testosterone E1 E2

EP

E2, EE2

AC C

1 2

38

LTQ-Orbitrap

Reference [56]

[73]

Structurally-informative fragmentation were made based n on MS ; NMR confirmation

[74]

Using a model compound 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthol

[75]

Identify assignment based on personal interpretation of spectra and referral to literature Accurate mass data were used for identification. MSn data were used for confirmation

[76]

Part of degradation products were confirmed using authentic standards Analogy to previously confirmed products; Part of the compounds were confirmed by NMR analysis

[77]

Degradation products of E2 and EE2 from the literature was compiled to build an in-house library which was used for identification By analogy to published data

[66]

[70]

[11]

[67]

Structure was postulated based on characteristic neutral losses Halogenated isotopic patterns helped the identification

[78]

Based on H/D exchange, MSn and accurate mass measurement strategies [4-14C]-Testosterone and NMR were used to assist identification Structural illustration based on MSn and deuteriumlabeled E1 (E1-D4) 13 C labeled E2 was used to identify cross-coupling

[68]

[58]

[79] [80] [69]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EE2

Hydroxylation, hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, side-chain breakdown Oxidized to carboxylic acid,

products ESI

TQ

Confirmation using authentic standards if available

Ozonation

ESI

TQ

Dehydrogenation, hydrogenation, hydroxylation Hydroxylated, ring-cleavage products Oligomers

Biodegradation by bacteria from activated sludge from WWTP TiO2 photocatalysis in water matrix

ESI

TQ

ESI

TQ

Ligninase-mediated transformation

ESI

TQ

Desaturation, hydroxylation, dehydrogenation A-ring dehydrogenation product Hydroxylation, polymerization

Biodegradation by riverine sediment

ESI

TQ

Degradation by river water

ESI

TQ and Q-TOF

ESI

RI PT

Progesterone, norgestrel

darkness in humic acid-containing solution Biotransformation by microalgae isolated from lake water

Full scan to determine the precursor ions; precursor ion scan and product ion scan to determine the structure of major oxidation products; oxidation products of EE2 were derived from model compounds and were confirmed by either GC-MS or authentic standards if applicable Confirmation using authentic standards if available

[8]

[47]

Q-TOF

Byproducts were tentatively identified by referring to previous literature Molecular modeling was applied to postulate coupling reaction pathways Confirmation by GC/MS and using authentic standards if available EAWAG BBD prediction alongside literature references; confirmation by Q-TOF Confirmation using authentic standards if available

ESI

Q-TOF

Confirmation using standards

[83]

ESI

Q-TOF

[64]

ESI

Q-TOF

The use of CID, accurate mass measurement and the use of model compounds and 2H-labled E1 permitted the structure proposed Structures were proposed based on molecular accurate mass, chromatographic retention times, product ion spectra

Quantum chemical calculations were performed based on the density functional theory method to identify the potential reaction sites Three products were confirmed using authentic standards

[62]

α/ß-hydroxy acid

E2 E1 E1

E2, EE2

E1, E2, E3, EE2

Testosterone Androstenedione, testosterone

Ring-cleavage products, pyridinestrone acid Hydroxylation

Enzymatic catalyzed photolysis in humic acid-containing solution Biodegradation by degraders in activated sludge from STP Direct photolysis

M AN U

TE D

Progesterone

EP

E2-3S, E2-3G

Formation of hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups on A ring of parent compounds, ethinyl group intact Dimer, trimers, and tetramers

Peroxymonosulfate oxidation of steroid estrogens

Mn (Ⅲ) mediated phototransformation

ESI

Q-TOF

Dehydrogenation, hydroxylation Rearrangement, hydration, and more highly oxidized

Biodegradation by swine manure

ESI

Q-TOF

Direct photodegradation

ESI

Q-TOF

AC C

E2

SC

containing products

Progesterone, norgestrel EE2

[45]

39

[46]

[48] [49] [81] [82]

[51]

[84] [85]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

E1, testosterone

E1, E2, EE2 EE2

Dimer, trimer Two epimers

E1, E2, EE2

Dimer, trimer

Q-TOF

13

Photodegradation

ESI

Q-TOF

Biodegradation Ozonation

ESI APCI

Q-TOF Q-TOF

Quantum chemical calculations were performed based on the density functional theory method to identify the potential reaction sites Confirmation by NMR analysis Identification by referring to deuterated EE2.

[86] [87]

Biodegradation by bacterial strains and activated sludge from STP and river water Laccase catalysis Degradation by iron tetra-amido macro-cyclic ligand complex Transformation by peroxidase

ESI

HDMS-QTOF

Two metabolites were confirmed by NMR

[88]

ESI ESI

TOF TOF

Confirmation by NMR analysis

[59] [61]

ESI

TOF

C labeled-testosterone

[65] [63]

[60]

EP

TE D

E1, estrone; E2, 17ß-estradiol; EE2,17α-ethynylestradiol; 17α-TBOH, 17α-trenbolone; 17ß-TBOH,17ß-trenbolone; TBO, trendione; E1-3S, estrone-3-sulfate; E2-3G, 17ß-estradiol3-glucuronide; E2-3S, 17ß-estradiol-3-sulfate; STP: sewage treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance; HDMS, high definition mass spectrometry (from Waters); IT: ion trap; LTQ-FT ICR, linear trap quadruple-Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance; LTQ-Orbitrap, linear trap quadruple-Orbitrap; TQ, triple quadruple; Q-TOF, quadruple time-of-flight; TOF, time-of-flight; GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; LC-MS; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; H/D exchange, hydrogen/deuterium exchange; CID, collision-induced dissociation; ESI, electrospray ionization; APCI, atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization

AC C

3 4 5 6 7

Hydroxylation Two muconic acid derivatives with open phenolic ring structures Hydroxylated products, metacleavage product

ESI

RI PT

E2 EE2

Biotransformation

SC

E2

photoproducts A-ring cleavage product with 17 carbons E1, hydroxylated products, oligomers

M AN U

Testosterone

40

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights:

RI PT

SC M AN U



TE D



EP



LC-MS capacities and overall MS-based steps for structural elucidation of novel metabolites of environmental steroid hormones were generalized. Fragmentation reactions and fragmentation pathways of protonated and deprotonated molecules of the metabolites were summarized. Versatile orthogonal techniques and intelligent spectral interpretation strategies used in literature for structural elucidation were specified. Up-to-date applications of LC-MS on structural elucidation of biotic and abiotic transformation products of environmental steroid hormones were provided.

AC C